[HN Gopher] Quiet route planning for pedestrians in traffic nois...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Quiet route planning for pedestrians in traffic noise polluted
       environments
        
       Author : ericdanielski
       Score  : 168 points
       Date   : 2020-07-27 17:29 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (k1z.blog.uni-heidelberg.de)
 (TXT) w3m dump (k1z.blog.uni-heidelberg.de)
        
       | userbinator wrote:
       | I'll be a bit contrarian and say that I actually do enjoy the
       | sounds of traffic, but only some sounds. Most late-model cars
       | emit what I'd consider noise, but the low burbling of big V8s or
       | the bassy notes of big trucks are music to my ears. Maybe it's
       | just nostalgia...
        
       | idreyn wrote:
       | I think a variation of this comfort-optimized route planning tool
       | would be really useful for cyclists as well. I've found that
       | Google Maps favors streets with bike lanes when planning bike
       | trips, but those are typically main thoroughfares where the bike
       | lane is a last line of defense against aggressive drivers,
       | delivery vehicles, and "dooring". Often these are paralleled by
       | quieter streets where cars drive at careful speeds and a bike
       | lane is not really necessary for safety.
        
         | boxcardavin wrote:
         | Ebikers naturally start taking routes that optimize for safety
         | and enjoyment over avoiding hills. It would be cool for Strava
         | or Goog Maps to detect ebikers (easy to tell from speed vs road
         | grade) and weight their routes more heavily in deciding the
         | best route to recommend.
        
           | bobthepanda wrote:
           | Even better than just trying to detect it via ML, let it be a
           | separate option to toggle.
        
             | bdamm wrote:
             | Still need ML to build the menu of paths.
        
               | bobthepanda wrote:
               | Sure, but
               | 
               | > to detect ebikers (easy to tell from speed vs road
               | grade) and weight their routes more heavily in deciding
               | the best route to recommend.
               | 
               | seems like an anti-pattern that screws over people who
               | don't have e-bikes.
               | 
               | If users can tell us that they're using an e-bike and we
               | give a separate option then both e-bikers and pedalers
               | can have navigation options that work best for the
               | specific use case, rather than shoehorning both into the
               | same option.
               | 
               | We need to stop assuming things using ML and pretend like
               | that's somehow more user-friendly than the user directly
               | telling us what they want. (See: constant griping about
               | how poorly non-verbatim Google search is getting)
        
         | matsemann wrote:
         | Huh, I often find the opposite. If there's a nice bike path
         | from A to B in an arc, Google often prefers a shorter path
         | straight through a residential area. Which means multiple turns
         | one has to memorize and also slow down for.
        
         | dylan-m wrote:
         | Strava does something interesting here with their route
         | planner. It's a bit finicky, but it gravitates toward public
         | segments for either running or cycling. A segment on Strava is
         | like a well-known running route or a chunk of a path, and when
         | you upload an activity it finds which segments you went along
         | so you can see how your results change over time, and what
         | other people are doing. So it generally gives better (or at
         | least safer) routes than Google Maps since it's based on what
         | people actually do :)
         | 
         | Alas, it takes a lot of effort to actually build a route with
         | the thing.
        
         | cameronh90 wrote:
         | Check out Komoot. Myself and many in the UK swear by it for
         | bicycle route planning.
        
       | ahelwer wrote:
       | With coronavirus lockdown I've taken to going on long strolls
       | while listening to audiobooks. Since I don't like wearing noise-
       | canceling headphones due to situational awareness concerns
       | (opting for a cheap pair of Koss PortaPros), it has struck me
       | just how _loud_ a regular car is as it drives by at low speed. I
       | have to crank up the volume above a safe level to continue
       | listening to my book as one drives by. It makes me yearn for an
       | urban future where personal car ownership is a distant memory.
       | 
       | And gas-powered leafblowers. Oh man, those are the worst. DC was
       | right to ban them.
        
         | Spooky23 wrote:
         | I work on my front patio, and I wish I had run a dB meter
         | thoroughout my Covid experience. I live in the city and it was
         | _silent_ in early May -- at one point I observed no cars on the
         | nearby avenue for 20 minutes.
         | 
         | As for leaf blowers, if you think gas is bad, try for the extra
         | capacity battery powered ones with higher RPM. Sounds like
         | someone screaming.
        
         | Nasrudith wrote:
         | People complained more about cars being quiet and they assume
         | fairly hard of hearing and poor vision as a baseline
         | essentially. I personally consider it something that sucks and
         | would love them quieter while considering their current
         | mandated state a justifiable lesser evil.
         | 
         | Deliberately loudened motorcycles and sportcars because fools
         | think louder is faster can go straight to hell though.
        
           | andrepd wrote:
           | >Deliberately loudened motorcycles and sportcars because
           | fools think louder is faster can go straight to hell though.
           | 
           | I don't get it. Why can a shithead on a motorcycle get away
           | with bothering hundreds of people by revving hard in the
           | street? Why do they get away with higher noise ceilings than
           | cars?
        
             | rapind wrote:
             | Grab a megaphone with the siren sound effect and have some
             | fun with them.
        
             | MetalGuru wrote:
             | Seriously! The worst! The South Park episode that makes fun
             | of this group is hilarious.
        
             | Ntrails wrote:
             | Why are buskers allowed to bellow out whatever garbage They
             | want through amplifiers which are just as loud and _to me_
             | more obnoxious?
        
               | hiharryhere wrote:
               | Oh come on. That's a ridiculous equivalency. Buskers
               | aren't constantly moving through residential
               | neighborhoods at speed, disturbing hundreds in their
               | homes.
               | 
               | I'd be annoyed by a one man band with knee cymbals and a
               | bass drum pacing up and down my cul-de-sac too.
        
               | jschwartzi wrote:
               | Yeah, especially as we get about 1 "loud pipes" guy every
               | half hour throughout the day where I live, I'd love to
               | have Mr. Loud Pipes be regulated into oblivion.
               | 
               | It's so bad that I'll be sitting inside with my SO having
               | a conversation and we'll pause whatever we're saying for
               | Mr. Loud Pipes, then when he's gone we can start talking
               | again.
        
             | bradlys wrote:
             | Sounds like confirmation bias. I don't know if there is a
             | higher noise ceiling than cars. I've seen plenty of people
             | in cars rev their engines. And it's wildly common all over
             | the USA... Civics with fart pipes, trucks rolling coal, v8s
             | with a muffler delete, etc.
             | 
             | Most motorcycles are built with an enthusiast in mind who
             | wants a louder bike. Most cars aren't build with
             | enthusiasts in mind.
             | 
             | I'd love to know why we've allowed delivery vehicles and
             | buses (commercial vehicles) to have similar noise
             | regulations. Since those vehicles are really only for
             | utility, one would assume we'd regulate those into
             | quietness at least...
        
         | clairity wrote:
         | > "And gas-powered leafblowers. Oh man, those are the worst. DC
         | was right to ban them."
         | 
         | agreed, but mostly for the atrocious pollution those things put
         | out. here in LA, they're also banned but still widely used. i
         | can smell them, let alone hear them, through my window nearly a
         | hundred feet away.
         | 
         | with electric vehicles still rising, i can't wait for the day
         | we can relegate most (all?) gas-powered machines to well-
         | segregated industrial areas and thereby reduce both noise and
         | air pollution drastically in our living environments.
        
           | stefan_ wrote:
           | Since we are at it, can we ban gasoline scooters? They
           | feature the same leafblower engines, and I have the
           | impression they have been "grandfathered" in emissions
           | legislation so often that the entire population must have
           | been replaced three times over.
           | 
           | China has it right, those prehistoric things have no place
           | anymore.
        
             | twblalock wrote:
             | If you ban gas-powered scooters I don't think it would make
             | much difference. The people who ride them won't care.
        
             | voisin wrote:
             | How about gas powered lawnmowers? Far more prevalent, awful
             | for both sound and emissions.
        
               | ip26 wrote:
               | Lawn mowers at least have four-stroke engines instead of
               | two. Although, as you say, vastly more prevalent.
        
               | AmVess wrote:
               | They are 4 stroke, but they put small mufflers on them.
               | Electric lawnmowers make a lot of noise, too. Not as bad
               | as the droning of a 4 stroke at full throttle, but still
               | noisy.
               | 
               | I long for the day we ban lawns. Do that, and lawn mowers
               | and weed whackers would vanish overnight.
        
               | UweSchmidt wrote:
               | My neighbor started a new lawn. The amount of water he
               | has been using during the last few weeks with this
               | automated sprinkling system is staggering. There should
               | be a more natural and robust solution, some mix of weeds
               | and small flowers that's also walkable, but also gives
               | bees and other insects a place to live.
        
               | morsch wrote:
               | Depends on where you are. Lawnmower density decreases as
               | population density increases. Scooter density is the
               | other way round.
               | 
               | I'd ban them immediately. The noise and air pollution is
               | insane. Have the government co-finance replacement
               | electrical scooters if it helps.
        
               | toxik wrote:
               | Huh, I thought most of them were two stroke.
        
               | Spooky23 wrote:
               | Not for a long time. My cheap Walmart Murray was like $75
               | and is a fairly efficient four stroke, but is incredibly
               | weak with the emissions tech and awful engine!
        
               | toxik wrote:
               | I guess it's a question of where you live. I meant the
               | actual lawnmowers people use rather than what is on the
               | shelves today - I have only seen oily old two-strokers
               | around me.
               | 
               | Also I thought low power gasoline engines were more
               | efficient, but I guess they tend not to have any
               | catalytic converters
        
               | WWLink wrote:
               | As obnoxious as they are, no. Leaf blowers are WAAAAY
               | worse.
               | 
               | I mean I do agree that gas lawn mowers are noisy
               | obnoxious smokey things that blow dust around. But a leaf
               | blower's whole purpose in life is to blow dirt around -
               | and at full blast they're way louder than the loudest
               | lawn mower.
               | 
               | Plus the lawn mower takes like 10-30 minutes to mow a
               | yard in most yards out here. Probably 15 if the person
               | operating it is doing it quickly.
               | 
               | Leaf blower though? I can see those jerks using those
               | things for a good 45 minutes or so! Ugh.
        
               | WillDaSilva wrote:
               | Plus a clear replacement exists: electric lawnmowers.
               | People may argue that they're not as good, but they're
               | certainly good enough for almost every case.
        
               | bdamm wrote:
               | The upcoming battery powered models are getting pretty
               | good. In some cases they have even more power than you
               | can get from a gas motor, and of course the agility,
               | quiet, and easy starting of an electric motor.
        
             | upofadown wrote:
             | My Yamaha 150 BWs gas powered scooter is 4 stroke and has a
             | catalytic converter.
             | 
             | Are 2 stroke scooters even a thing anymore?
        
               | Tade0 wrote:
               | They were in the EU until 2018, when two-wheel vehicles
               | that didn't comply to the EURO 4 emissions standard were
               | phased out.
               | 
               | There are still many 2017 and earlier units on the roads,
               | but give it a few years and they'll be gone as well.
        
         | sandworm101 wrote:
         | >>It makes me yearn for an urban future where personal car
         | ownership is a distant memory.
         | 
         | Every time I had to got to SF it wasn't the cars that woke me
         | up at night. It was sirens on the ambulances and fire trucks.
         | Those are not ever going away.
         | 
         | Airplanes, driven by robots or not, are still going to be loud.
         | Trucks, driven by robots or not, are still going to haul their
         | heavy loads (resulting in road noise). Dogs will always bark.
         | Kids will always play there music too loud. Private cars are
         | not the source of every evil.
        
           | jschwartzi wrote:
           | The difference is that thousands of dogs, kids, and trucks
           | don't pass by my house every morning on their way to work,
           | then again in the evening on their way home.
        
         | drivers99 wrote:
         | Exact same situation for me with regard to noise and
         | audiobooks/podcasts. Another one is looking into cars' bright
         | headlights at night. I started finding ways to go along
         | residential streets instead of arterial ones. There is actually
         | a wall along the sides of the arterial road making the
         | difference even greater (extra noise on the arterial, less on
         | the residential one street away). They have a big sidewalk on
         | the arterial but they also have sprinklers overspraying on them
         | as well. So, one more benefit to stay off them.
         | 
         | Typical example: DTC Blvd (supposedly nice but loud and you get
         | sprayed with sprinklers)
         | https://www.google.com/maps/@39.6123322,-104.8861333,3a,75y,...
         | 
         | vs
         | 
         | 1 block over, doesn't even have sidewalks, but is much nicer to
         | walk through. There are trails which let you get through to the
         | next area.
         | https://www.google.com/maps/@39.6125315,-104.8823492,3a,75y,...
         | 
         | (There are also multi-use paths nearby as well but they are
         | crowded lately under the circumstances. The parks are closed
         | after dusk.)
        
         | saagarjha wrote:
         | When going on walks, I like to note down spots where I can't
         | hear any man-made noise. Even after lockdown anywhere within
         | ~1000 feet of I-280 doesn't qualify, even from the backside of
         | De Anza's knoll where you can't see it anymore and there's
         | nothing else that could possibly make noise. But there is a
         | stretch of west Stevens Creek Road, away from overhead power
         | lines, that is now mostly quiet for minutes at a time whereas
         | before you'd only get a couple seconds before a car would turn
         | into one of the gated communities or a truck would go past on
         | its way to the Permanente plant. It's not like there was a
         | steady stream of these going past-no, the road is straight so
         | you'd hear them from hundreds of feet away. Not even electric
         | cars solve the issue that a vehicle that's moving past a
         | crawl...is still kind of loud.
        
           | legerdemain wrote:
           | It's basically impossible to find areas of quiet on the
           | peninsula, if you want genuine quiet. Even the parks along
           | Skyline have a consistent level of noise from planes
           | overhead.
        
             | bdamm wrote:
             | Genuine quiet is really tough. Even in the middle of
             | Yosemite you can hear planes going by at 25 or 30 thousand
             | feet. Planes flying Denver to San Francisco are already on
             | an approach track when they fly over Yosemite.
        
               | shmageggy wrote:
               | Gordon Hempton has been documenting the decline of spaces
               | free from man made noise, and it's shocking how few
               | places there are remaining.
               | 
               | https://www.outsideonline.com/2397949/quiet-parks-
               | internatio...
        
         | sib wrote:
         | "And gas-powered leafblowers. Oh man, those are the worst."
         | 
         | Gas-powered leafblowers pretty much define negative
         | externalities:
         | 
         | >> Pollution >> Noise >> The actual leaves being blown onto
         | neighboring properties
         | 
         | Would be great to completely ban them.
        
         | cheschire wrote:
         | I picked up some bone conducting headphones. Not the best audio
         | quality but I got them for bike riding. They also function
         | perfectly on airplanes in conjunction with pressure equalizing
         | ear plugs.
        
         | Swizec wrote:
         | > I have to crank up the volume above a safe level to continue
         | listening to my book as one drives by
         | 
         | This is why I use noise cancelling headphones when running. The
         | lower volume means I have _more_ situational awareness. My
         | hearing isn't slamming against the redline from high music
         | /book volume so my brain doesn't have to keep filtering. When
         | something happens it's more likely to stand out and I'll hear
         | it.
         | 
         | Plus my ears don't hurt after a 2 hour run. Similar effect as
         | earplugs on a motorcycle.
        
           | ahelwer wrote:
           | Interested in your experience here. Do you feel safe when,
           | for example, crossing the street?
        
             | Swizec wrote:
             | Super safe. But I'm also the kind of guy who looks both
             | ways crossing a one-way street and checks blind spots when
             | walking.
             | 
             | Maybe it comes from years of boosted boards and
             | motorcycles. Got very used to looking around.
             | 
             | And it's always possible that my ears/brain are just weird.
             | I find that noise bothers me more than most people. I can
             | hear someone crinkling candy wrappers from across the
             | office through my QC-35 with music on. And it will drive me
             | bonkers.
        
         | masklinn wrote:
         | > Since I don't like wearing noise-canceling headphones due to
         | situational awareness concerns
         | 
         | That's kinda why I was interested in noise-cancelling cans with
         | a "transparency" mode, able to feed back into the 'cans as
         | needed/desired.
         | 
         | Haven't had the occasion to even try one though.
        
           | virgil_disgr4ce wrote:
           | I use the pass-through mode of my Jabra Elites whenever I'm
           | in a store or need to interact with people or otherwise hear
           | / be aware. I feel sort of bad keeping the earphones in,
           | because I don't want people to think I'm being an asshole,
           | but I can generally hear them just fine.
        
           | idreyn wrote:
           | The "ambient sound" mode on my Sony WH-1000XM2 headphones
           | works very well for this. I find it useful for video calls;
           | without the feedback of hearing my own voice I tend towards
           | shouting.
        
             | masklinn wrote:
             | Nice. Is the ambient curve customisable? (e.g. allow voice
             | to go through easily but some other noises less so). How
             | large are the ear pads (I have rather large and prominent
             | ears so fitting them inside the pads can be a hassle and
             | having the cartilage pressed against the skull is quickly
             | uncomfortable).
        
               | mathieuh wrote:
               | I have the same ones and yes it is, you adjust it through
               | the app. They have big cups, I would consider myself to
               | have average-sized ears and I can move them around on my
               | head without my ears touching.
        
             | toxik wrote:
             | That happens automatically once the codec switches to
             | telephony - along with a quite significant difference in
             | audio quality.
        
         | scythe wrote:
         | >It makes me yearn for an urban future where personal car
         | ownership is a distant memory.
         | 
         | You won't have to wait that long -- EVs reduce noise
         | substantially and mass adoption is probably one to three
         | decades away depending on the city
        
           | benrbray wrote:
           | No need to wait -- a short stay in Tokyo was enough to
           | convince me that daily life can be much better _right now_ if
           | I leave the United States. I was scheduled to move
           | permanently to Japan in May, but unfortunately the travel ban
           | delayed my move.
           | 
           | As a young person with few attachments, it was an easy
           | decision to leave, especially given all that has happened the
           | last few months.
           | 
           | One to three decades is 1/8 to 1/2 of my life, if I'm lucky
           | not to get hit by a car before then. Until the United States
           | can catch up to the rest of the developed world, I'll be
           | voting with my residence.
        
           | leetcrew wrote:
           | maybe true to an extent, but most modern ICE vehicles have
           | pretty quiet exhausts. above parking lot speeds, you are
           | mostly hearing noise from the tires and displacement of air.
        
           | globular-toast wrote:
           | When driven normally (or considerately) the engine noise of a
           | petrol car is barely perceptible above the noise of the tyres
           | on the road. EVs are heavier than petrol cars so will produce
           | even more road noise. Also, in many places EVs will be
           | required to produce an artificial sound in addition to the
           | road noise.
           | 
           | The thing with sound is our perceptible dynamic range is
           | huge. If you live in a city you probably don't think regular
           | car noise is that bad. That's because your noise floor is
           | really, really high. When you're out in the countryside with
           | no wind, a single car is the loudest thing for miles around.
        
           | aitchnyu wrote:
           | Seems noise levels wont improve much with today's tires:
           | 
           | > Traffic noise is created by vehicle exhaust systems,
           | engines, and by contact of tires with the road during travel.
           | Of these, tire contact with the road accounts for 75 to 90
           | percent of the overall traffic noise.
        
             | zby wrote:
             | That depends on speed for sure.
        
               | bradlys wrote:
               | Above 20mph, you're mostly hearing tire noise as far as I
               | can tell. And I'd say most driving is above 20.
               | 
               | Most people kind of forget about tire noise when
               | purchasing tires. I don't think most people put much
               | thought in tires ever anyway.
        
         | ponker wrote:
         | I prefer loud cars. I've often been surprised by bad drivers
         | driving Teslas while the bad drivers in ICE cars I hear
         | approaching.
        
         | lazyjones wrote:
         | Modern gasoline cars are very quiet compared to motorcycles,
         | buses, trucks.
         | 
         | But they still get 100% of the hate...
        
           | bdamm wrote:
           | Well they're still much louder than an EV.
        
             | lazyjones wrote:
             | A bicycle is louder than a Tesla Model 3 at low speed, so
             | that doesn't make it a pressing issue.
        
         | spaetzleesser wrote:
         | Leaf blowers suck. Loud and smelly. I have also heard that they
         | are destroying the habitat of insects which will have long term
         | consequences for our ecosystem.
        
       | viburnum wrote:
       | This is nice but it would be better if people could enjoy their
       | neighborhoods without having to think about noise and pollution.
        
       | wiml wrote:
       | Nice project! On the subject of different optimization goals for
       | route planning, I was thinking about car travel. Google optimizes
       | for travel time, but I often want to weight "route simplicity"
       | higher than time -- I'd rather take a straight shot down a mildly
       | congested highway than wind through a bunch of peoples'
       | backyards. And why not an option to "minimize deaths"? Some
       | routes (and some turns) are more accident-prone than others; at
       | Google scale you could save a lot of lives this way.
        
         | leetcrew wrote:
         | frankly, I wish there were a lot more settings to optimize for
         | in google maps. I actually prefer to stay _off_ the highway for
         | short trips, even if it takes a little longer. it feels super
         | wasteful to accelerate up to 60+ mph to merge safely, then slam
         | on the brakes one or two exits later. similarly, google will
         | often send me through complicated (and therefore dangerous,
         | imo) intersections which could be avoided completely with a
         | couple extra turns. sometimes I 'm not in any real hurry to get
         | somewhere; it would be nice to have a "scenic route" option for
         | these cases.
         | 
         | unfortunately, I suspect the simplicity is more a deliberate
         | design choice rather than mere laziness. I'm not holding my
         | breath for these features, but I hope that one day a viable
         | competitor may emerge to offer navigation for power users.
        
           | magicalhippo wrote:
           | > similarly, google will often send me through complicated
           | (and therefore dangerous, imo) intersections
           | 
           | Reminds me of another Google Maps story. Was picking up
           | something second hand, so was driving somewhere unfamiliar. I
           | followed Google Maps, and the route seemed reasonable.
           | 
           | Then I hit the residential area where my destination was.
           | Google Maps told me to drive up this really narrow road to
           | get onto another road. Looked really weird, but I couldn't
           | see any other choice besides a long detour so I carefully
           | drove up that road.
           | 
           | At my destination, I told the woman I was buying from about
           | Google Maps and that narrow road. "So _that's_ why all those
           | people are driving on that pedestrian road" she exclaimed.
           | 
           | Apparently I was not the first...
        
         | magicalhippo wrote:
         | > Google optimizes for travel time
         | 
         | Speaking of Google Map route optimization...
         | 
         | I was out and about the other day and entered the next
         | destination in Google Maps. It told me to drive 80km which
         | would have taken over an hour due to the roads.
         | 
         | Fortunately I knew that had to be wrong. After a bit of poking
         | I found I had turned on "avoid toll roads"... after switching
         | that off, it showed me a 5 minute route instead.
         | 
         | Sure I had to pay a few bucks for it, but in my mind "avoid
         | toll roads" does not mean "avoid toll roads at all cost".
        
       | nn3 wrote:
       | Very cool. I would totally use that if it was available in an
       | easy app for my city. Hopefully that research migrates quickly to
       | the industry.
        
       | phjesusthatguy3 wrote:
       | I'll be adding my observances of my commute to OpenStreetMap
       | shortly. Thank you!
        
       | mamurphy wrote:
       | This reminds me of the recently-posted Trail Router[0] for
       | jogging mapping.
       | 
       | [0]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23802317
        
       | supernova87a wrote:
       | Of course, the authors being from Germany, they may have
       | different expectations about how the existing noise environment
       | colors people's concern about a little more/less noise in
       | general.
       | 
       | I remember taking subways (subways!, not even to mention HSR) in
       | Germany (Munich, Berlin, etc) where you could hear a pin drop
       | during the journey, and where you could talk to your fellow
       | traveler in a whisper.
       | 
       | Go to New York or Boston, and people look at you like you're a
       | wimp if you ask why the train is screeching so loudly.
       | 
       | And then another example, if you've lived in the UK for any time,
       | you come to believe that cars are supposed to make the constant
       | diesel-level cranking noise even at idle. And then you go across
       | the channel and find that miraculously, cars can actually be
       | manufactured to be quiet.
        
         | snakeboy wrote:
         | In metro systems all over France I find the screech to be
         | almost painful. Can anyone with more experience chip in on how
         | say Paris compares to New York in this regard?
        
       | onion2k wrote:
       | It's probably not possible but it ought to take terrain topology
       | and trees in to account. New motorways are usually built with
       | earth banks topped with trees to stop noise pollution. Its very
       | effective.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-07-27 23:00 UTC)