[HN Gopher] Show HN: Unscreen - Automatically remove video backg...
___________________________________________________________________
Show HN: Unscreen - Automatically remove video backgrounds with ML
Author : groe
Score : 212 points
Date : 2020-08-05 08:04 UTC (14 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.unscreen.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.unscreen.com)
| victornomad wrote:
| Looks very impressive, but please do not autoplay all the videos
| at once on the website. My computer fans started to spin like
| crazy!
| mmwelt wrote:
| It killed my Android tablet running Firefox! First everything
| slowed down, then the status bar disappeared, then... black
| screen. Had to restart.
| cjmcqueen wrote:
| I'm genuinely surprised my Pixel 3 phone had no problems with
| it in Chrome. That was a lot of video.
| [deleted]
| Asuchug4 wrote:
| Somehow I parsed the title as next-gen adblock. Well, it is great
| to see the required technology is already here.
| CyberDildonics wrote:
| This is an area of research called natural image matting that has
| been going on for over 20 years.
|
| Some influential papers include:
|
| https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/...
|
| https://webee.technion.ac.il/people/anat.levin/papers/Mattin...
| mobilio wrote:
| From same authors that make tool for removing backgrounds from
| images - remove.bg
|
| It was discussed here:
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18697601
| anchpop wrote:
| I'm curious if this is just repackaging existing OSS algorithms
| for isolating foregrounds, or if they have an actually new
| implementation that outperforms them
| Jaruzel wrote:
| BEWARE. remove.bg seems to have a malware/fake Chrome update
| popup.
| groe wrote:
| It's a hint for outdated browsers, it's not an ad and there's
| nothing malicious behind it (unless there's an issue in your
| local network or machine perhaps?).
|
| http://browser-update.org/
| https://www.npmjs.com/package/browser-update
|
| It's a fine line though to not get into the way with things
| like this, and we could certainly improve it's appearance a
| bit - sorry for that.
| [deleted]
| TonyTrapp wrote:
| Fresh Chromium installation, no adblocking or other content
| blocking plugins. Zero advertisements and popups on that
| site. I keep reading these kind of comments on HN and
| everytime it seems to be only that one person reporting the
| problem that sees that behavior. Are you sure your network is
| not compromised?
| [deleted]
| Jaruzel wrote:
| > Are you sure your network is not compromised?
|
| It's definitely not. Also used 3 different browsers - each
| one showed the same dialog but with the name and version of
| that browser. It doesn't happen on my mobile over WiFi
| (rules out network injection).
|
| This is what I'm seeing: https://imgur.com/a/o9PNmaU
|
| It's being inserted via a .js file on static.remove.bg:
|
| https://static.remove.bg/remove-bg-
| web/38c6be57b031c26a2186b...
|
| (search for 'out of date' )
|
| So either the site owner is complicit, or they've been
| hacked.
|
| Edit: Fired up a VM of Windows 7 - Same message - so unless
| my routers been hacked to inject that script somehow, i'm
| 99% certain it's not me.
| ninjaranter wrote:
| Are you sure it's malware? Looking at the code it seems
| to redirect to "browser-update.org" and is genuinely
| redirecting only older browsers based on unsupported
| features.
| aembleton wrote:
| Looking at the code, it is using a script from Browser
| Update[1] to determine whether to show that message.
|
| Here's the line from the js you linked to that checks the
| browser version:
| window.checkBrowserVersion = function() { i()({ required:
| { i: 12, e: -4, f: -3, o: -3, s: -1, c: -3 }, insecure:
| !0, unsupported: !0, reminder: 0, reminderClosed: 168,
| style: "corner", api: 2019.06, test: !1, onshow:
| function() { window.track &&
| window.track("BrowserUpdate", "outdated_version_dialog",
| "Browser version outdated dialog") } }) }, $((function()
| { window.checkBrowserVersion() }));
|
| The c: -3 is the crucial bit that should cause it to
| trigger if your version is at least 3 versions out of
| date.
|
| Yours isn't though. Can you access http://browser-
| update.org ? If not, then there might be something with
| your DNS settings. Have you tried tethering through your
| phone? Have you changed your user agent?
|
| 1. http://browser-update.org/#install
| aembleton wrote:
| Just checked, and my Chrome is on version 84. Version 80
| is out of date.
|
| You need to update Chrome.
| Jaruzel wrote:
| To be frank, I don't _need_ to do anything. I 'll update
| Chrome when I'm ready, thanks.
|
| What I object to, is a dodgy popup appearing on an
| unrelated website.
| sreekotay wrote:
| That's interesting. Number of versions is probably a weak
| signal for this --- but how many browser versions should
| the dev a small site be looking for? Things DO break...
| noja wrote:
| You don't _need_ to call an ambulance when you break your
| leg, but your browser has at least five high
| vulnerabilities (and one critical vulnerability).
| noja wrote:
| Perhaps the GP is receiving malware through a targeted or
| non-targeted advertising campaign.
| sytelus wrote:
| If you want to get traction, you need to be far more creative in
| your business model. The main application of background removal
| is online meetings and its already well implemented but it leaves
| a lot to be desired. One thing you can do is to make service
| completely free. Offer a desktop app that creates a virtual
| camera that you can use in Zoom, Teams etc. Differentiate
| yourself by adding features such as much more cool and fun
| background wall papers or even live videos. Focus on adoption,
| not revenue. Once you get traction, offer premium background
| images or videos. Create a marketplace where people can buy/sell.
| Focus on buyout by big players because ultimately they have the
| platforms with millions of users where you can provide far more
| value.
|
| Removal of background in images is also big (your site only seem
| to offer video/gifs). I've personally tried half dozen solutions
| and all fell short in low lighting scenario. If you are actually
| doing good here, you can beat competition. There are probably
| hundred websites out there for background removal for images,
| none works well.
| isochronous wrote:
| The very first thing I thought when I saw this wasn't "ooh,
| cool tech for voice chat", it was "man, the special effects
| industry will KILL for this - no more manually going through
| every frame of an effects shot and painstakingly removing
| background elements!"
|
| So basically, I think the main assumption on which you built
| the rest of your advice is flawed.
| bergstromm466 wrote:
| > Once you get traction, offer premium background images or
| videos. Create a marketplace where people can buy/sell.
|
| A lot of this seems like guesswork, and honestly also like
| terrible advice. Maybe if the person had added their experience
| or a story about their own experience. Like the other person
| wrote, some advice might be irrelevant because this person
| hasn't understood the product to know it's it's for existing
| footage only, not live footage.
|
| Sometimes advice can be useful, but be wary when it sounds
| useful at first glance but includes no examples, and no
| credentials.
|
| Then often it's someone who considers themselves a success
| guru, without much sincerity. They just think that their advice
| is obvious, when its probably outside their domain. It's not
| bad faith, it seems to me they're just a wannabe startup
| guru/investor/founder/whisperer (what I write here might also
| be crap).
|
| The best advice I've found comes with intimate stories of
| failure. Stories that help you understand the underlying
| friction, yet aren't specific to the exact challenges you're
| facing, but leave you with solid hypotheses to explore.
| sytelus wrote:
| There is a lot of negativity in your response without even
| deluding to what's really wrong with the advice. There are
| tons of very successful founders recommending focusing on
| adoption instead of revenue in initial period. Freemium is
| very well adopted all over. Literally entire app industry
| worth billions of dollars use this model. Again, I'm not
| claiming to be expert in this domain. You are entitled to
| your opinion and frankly we are all armchair pundits here,
| however, it's bad form to spew out so much negativity without
| any reasoning or even alternative.
| Pyramus wrote:
| >There are tons of very successful founders recommending
| focusing on adoption instead of revenue in initial period.
|
| As of 2020, this is the exception rather than the rule. The
| problem is that focussing on adoption before focussing on
| value is very risky. You are constantly flirting with
| premature scaling before having found product/market fit
| (see e.g. Startup Genome project).
|
| However, successful businesses that have been built on
| adoption are _by-design_ much more likely to be well known.
| Again, it 's entirely possible to build a business that
| relies on network effects or economies of scale, but it's
| not the default advice I would give to founder.
|
| >Freemium is very well adopted all over. Literally entire
| app industry worth billions of dollars use this model.
|
| No, you are confusing freemium with advertising here, which
| is the predominant business model. The challenge with
| freemium is the conversion into paid, which you cannot
| predict unless you have proven the value hypothesis
| already.
| bergstromm466 wrote:
| Yeah I understand where you're coming from, and maybe my
| reply broke my own rule of giving advice without a personal
| story.
|
| Where i'm coming from is having listened to advice from
| people who I looked up to, but who did it to get rid of me
| (because I was ignorant of protocols/etiquette), rather
| than being genuinely interested in my project. I've learned
| that the SV world has a high rate of failure and many are
| hungry, and they try to also carve out a role for
| themselves, or try to get involved somehow, even if that
| means they'll claim competence in an area they're not
| competent in. I was more naive then, compared to today, but
| believing these 'gurus' was a painful learning experience
| for me, because their advice often left me stranded in the
| end.
|
| I'm not negative, it's more just sharing my disappointments
| and struggles. Thanks again for your comment, which made me
| see I kinda broke my own rule
| abraae wrote:
| > Again, I'm not claiming to be expert in this domain.
|
| Actually nowhere in your original post do you include this
| "not claiming to be an expert" disclaimer.
|
| As a result, when I read your original post, I assumed that
| perhaps you were an expert as there was no self-doubt at
| all evident.
|
| I think perhaps that's what the allegedly negative post
| that you are responding to is getting at.
| bitL wrote:
| This looks like it's targeting pros like me who need to remove
| background from high-quality videos. The price is completely
| OK.
| Hydraulix989 wrote:
| Right, this seems like a feature, not a product -- and it's not
| difficult to replicate. ML is becoming more and more of a
| commodity these days.
| onion2k wrote:
| _The main application of background removal is online meetings
| and its already well implemented but it leaves a lot to be
| desired._
|
| That's the most obvious case people see right now because we're
| doing more video calls in lockdown and people see it as a funny
| gimmick to play with on Google Meet, but background removal has
| been around for years in the professional video and film
| industry. Video chat is absolutely not the main application of
| the technology.
| abraae wrote:
| The video chat market though would be approximately a
| gazillion times larger than the professional video and film
| industry wouldn't it?
| cvhashim wrote:
| What about marketing to live streamers and youtubers
| nl wrote:
| Pretty hard to compete with the free implementations in
| most video chat tools...
| onion2k wrote:
| I have no idea. There's a gazillion times more people doing
| video calls than make professional videos, but not all of
| them would be willing to pay for the software and those who
| are probably wouldn't pay very much. It's the age old
| question of whether or not it's better to sell something
| cheaply at high volumes or more expensively at lower
| volumes.
| addandsubtract wrote:
| >the age old question of whether or not it's better to
| sell something cheaply at high volumes or more
| expensively at lower volumes.
|
| Factor in the support you need to accommodate your
| customers and you have your answer :P
| onion2k wrote:
| You can just ignore support entirely and then it costs
| nothing. It's what Google does.
| epanchin wrote:
| Good webcams are hard to find at the moment because
| people are very willing to spend money on their video
| calls.
| buzzerbetrayed wrote:
| > people are very willing to spend money on their video
| calls.
|
| MORE people are willing to spend money on webcams than in
| the recent past. That is why there is a supply issue.
| This doesn't necessarily mean a huge number of people are
| willing to spend money in it in general. Doubling a
| relatively small number doesn't automatically make it a
| big number.
| mlthoughts2018 wrote:
| Surveillance video processing and intelligence services are
| probably by far the largest use cases for video background
| removal and similar techniques. Far smaller in terms of
| number of customers, but far far larger in terms of revenue
| specifically for this capability.
|
| Millions of people paying peanuts (attributable to this
| feature) is way less than a few hundred or thousand research
| / defense labs, contractors, etc., paying tens of thousands
| up to even millions on licensed software for this type of
| thing.
| rasz wrote:
| In both teleconferencing and surveillance you are dealing
| with static background, no need for fancy ML algorithms.
| mlthoughts2018 wrote:
| No, not true. Surveillance cameras mounted on police
| cars, helicopters, etc. Even in stationary cameras, scene
| understanding is a hard problem. Suppose someone wheels a
| dolly of boxes into a warehouse and leaves them. Are they
| now part of the background? Are they suspicious boxes?
| The coarse level state transition of objects in the scene
| is really hard to solve even with heavy ML.
| CathedralBorrow wrote:
| My rule of thumb for advice on the Internet is that if it is
| mostly in the form of statements like "You need to do X, Y and
| Z" and has very few questions intended to dig deeper into the
| nuances of the product and business model... then it's not
| generally worth much at face value.
|
| Essentially: The less information a person needs to dish out
| advice, the less value I am going to place on their advice.
| bergstromm466 wrote:
| haha you said what i wanted to say in a way more concise way.
| nice one
| rbinv wrote:
| Sounds like that would evolve to become Google AdSense for your
| home office.
| lawlorino wrote:
| According to the FAQ this only works with prerecorded video,
| not live video.
| codethief wrote:
| > I've personally tried half dozen solutions and all fell short
| in low lighting scenario.
|
| Have you tried https://www.remove.bg ? I came across that site
| a while ago and was surprised how good the results were that I
| got. YMMV, though.
|
| [EDIT]: Looks like Unscreen is actually from the same people as
| remove.bg. [0]
|
| [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24058701
| groe wrote:
| We've built Unscreen on top of the tech of remove.bg, at
| least partly, and the #1 design goal for both products is a
| high result quality. We've summarized a few of the
| improvements recently here, if you're curious:
| https://www.remove.bg/b/introducing-remove-bg-x2
| htrp wrote:
| remove bg/unscreen are pretty much cool ML applications
| looking for a market
| bioipbiop wrote:
| There is a reason background removal sucks on chat apps. I
| fiddle around with the state of the art approaches, it takes a
| very expensive machine to get to an acceptable frame rate. It
| wouldn't scale.
| mattigames wrote:
| Would this be a good candidate for P2P? As what if your
| computer GPU could be used by other app's users to do a small
| part of such heavy operation? (when your GPU is not doing
| anything else)
| theon144 wrote:
| Latency.
| Roritharr wrote:
| Can you elaborate more? What are the approaches?
| aspenmayer wrote:
| Not OP, and not in this field, so do some more research, I
| am just sharing what I found:
|
| https://paperswithcode.com/task/video-background-
| subtraction
| maktouch wrote:
| I'm pretty happy with XSplit VCam
| (https://www.xsplit.com/vcam)
| atombender wrote:
| Anything like this for macOS?
| dividuum wrote:
| > Offer a desktop app that creates a virtual camera that you
| can use in Zoom, Teams etc. Differentiate yourself by adding
| features such as much more cool and fun background wall papers
| or even live videos.
|
| https://www.xsplit.com/vcam does exactly that already and is
| available on demand or for a lifetime license of $40. It works
| mostly ok. Unscreen's quality seems a lot better though.
| NicoJuicy wrote:
| Pre-existing example: Snapchat has an app to apply filters in
| webcams
| ponker wrote:
| The quality level here is way beyond what Zoom has or needs.
| This is a professional tool for creative pros -- knocking out
| an image background is too easy but video is a real challenge.
| And this kind of work at this resolution would be prohibitively
| expensive to do for live video ... you'd need a Titan RTX or
| similar.
| manmal wrote:
| I don't think it's feasible to do this level of processing in
| real-time _for free_.
| jchook wrote:
| Reading "The Lean Startup" by Eric Ries.
|
| He argues that this kind of "build it; they will come" aka
| "Just Do It" business process is a recipe for failure because
| you make a lot of untested assumptions about your market, and
| front-load a ton of (often wasteful) work.
|
| He suggests the "Build, measure, learn" feedback loop, which
| you actually plan backwards:
|
| 1. Figure out what you need to learn by outlining the key
| assumptions, including your value hypothesis and growth
| hypothesis.
|
| 2. Decide how you will measure your success in validating (or
| invalidating!) those assumptions with science (eg he calls his
| method "innovation accounting").
|
| 3. Build the smallest experiments (or MVPs) that will allow you
| to learn the things you need to learn.
|
| 4. Make adjustments to your hypothesis, rinse, and repeat.
|
| Another common theme, "get out of the building" and actually
| speak with all kinds of potential customers. Since a start-up
| operates in an environment of high uncertainty they cannot rely
| on traditional planning.
|
| Anyway I love reading the book and learning about the early
| days of Intuit, Dropbox, etc and how sometimes the way to make
| the most progress feels very counter-intuitive.
|
| It almost feels like a real world version of Stochastic
| Gradient Descent for businesses to mechanically gravitate to
| various local minima on an invisible failure landscape.
| cvhashim wrote:
| Also recommend "The Mom Test".
| bitL wrote:
| The price and business model is perfectly fine:
|
| 1) most pros use green screens for background removal
|
| 2) for (rare) shots where background needs to be removed and
| green screen cannot be applied, a high quality removal like
| the one here is needed
|
| 3) for such rare occurrences, charging higher amount of money
| is completely appropriate and no reasonable pro would
| complain as it would save them additional costs of re-
| shooting the scene completely or doing the removal manually
|
| 4) nobody has anything similar, so they can charge premium
| while it's possible
|
| Given what I mentioned I'd say their price is too low anyway.
| pmarreck wrote:
| the autoplaying movies are massacring my crappy cell internet
| connection
|
| (my home is currently one of the hundreds of thousands without
| power on the US east coast)
| aembleton wrote:
| Set uBlock Origin to block media elements larger than 50KB or
| whatever threshold you want. More info:
| https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Per-site-switches#no-...
| 23d wrote:
| Video background removal, when hair is involved, is painful.
| Clearly this is not targeted at webcam footage. Anyone who has
| had to manually remove a background using a tool like Premiere or
| After Effects from pre-recorded video would see the benefit of
| this tool/api. It is pricey but i can see motion graphics studios
| using this regularly.
| cateye wrote:
| It's actually quite funny that the Zoom auto remove background
| does a pretty good job. I can't get the same results easily in
| Adobe Premiere actually.
|
| Snapchat filters are even more impressive and it is magnitudes
| more difficult and time consuming to get similar results in After
| Effects.
|
| I really wondered if I was missing something so watched a lot of
| YouTube tutorials on background removal and object tracking and
| all I see is that it is very laborious and even than not always a
| good enough results with edge/transparency artifacts etc.
|
| Adobe really needs to implement new features for this because the
| expectations are changed by these apps and the bar is much
| higher.
| manmal wrote:
| IMO Zoom's background removal is not good at all. It's surely
| way lighter CPU-wise.
| bonoboTP wrote:
| In my experience zoom does a horrible job. It's a flickering
| mess, half the head is missing, etc. Perhaps in great lighting
| conditions it's better.
| [deleted]
| KingOfCoders wrote:
| EUR 1.98 / minute - wow.
| eps wrote:
| I'm guessing the OP aims at professional, high-quality video
| editing rather than at a hobby use. Which is probably the right
| thing to do as there are low-quality free options already. Hard
| to compete with that.
| crooked-v wrote:
| Wouldn't somebody doing professional video rather use a green
| screen instead, though?
| slezyr wrote:
| It's for 30 FPS. And only up to 1080p.
|
| > Up to 30 fps: Base price
|
| > 30-60 fps: Base price x 2
|
| > 60-90 fps: Base price x 3
| londons_explore wrote:
| That pricing looks very much "what it costs to run the
| service, plus some profit margin".
|
| A service run by anyone with any business acumen will charge
| what customers will pay, modified for benefits that customer
| brings the company (like referrals, bigger revenue leading to
| a higher company valuation, etc.).
|
| None of that depends on the frame rate or resolution.
| wodenokoto wrote:
| Very impressive results and great presentation.
|
| I imagine this can be useful for business that want to record
| small 360 of their products, but not invest in a big Physical
| setup.
| groe wrote:
| Thanks! Yes, professional 360deg product shots are way too hard
| to produce right now and we're aiming make them much more
| accessible, particularly for smaller vendors
| bryanrasmussen wrote:
| Since it doesn't do live video so no chat background virtual
| camera tools - but what if you did a video in the area you wanted
| to remove could you then use that for some sort of baseline for
| removing the background? So you do a video in the area you want
| to use your virtual camera in, and then when you're live it knows
| what the actual 'background' looks like so it can be used to
| remove live.
| manmal wrote:
| If you can keep the camera at a fixed position, that's surely a
| great option. I think that's not the use case this tool is for.
| A green screen would also work obv.
| LyalinDotCom wrote:
| How long before this is used to help fake political videos from
| existing footage. Sigh
| pabe wrote:
| Looks great and is exactly what one needs for professional
| screencasts if she doesn't want to fiddle around with a
| greenscreen. Thumbs up!
| Roritharr wrote:
| Looking really cool, I just hope a Premiere / After Effects
| Update won't kill your business.
| dirtyid wrote:
| Need longer demos to show temporal contiguity.
| manmal wrote:
| I think processing is done frame per frame.
| tsherr wrote:
| Looks very impressive, but it seems cripplingly expensive.
|
| I don't play with this much, but when I use my green screen, I'm
| often doing 15 minute videos, so it is well out of my hobby
| budget.
| rplnt wrote:
| The application of this would probably be different from what
| your use case is (since you can use green screen).
| hadeson wrote:
| Most kinds of professional applications I could think of
| would better off with a green screen. On the other hand,
| using this for editing videos in the wild with messy
| background still not good enough.
| billconan wrote:
| I want to integrate your service to remove background for product
| images. However, not everything works well, especially when
| background and foreground color are close.
|
| that's fine. The thing is that on the website, there is a tool to
| fix imperfect results, but with the api, there is no such tool.
| groe wrote:
| Since you mention images I assume you are referring to
| remove.bg, not unscreen.
|
| We're working on an SDK that will allow for editing on external
| sites. You can sign up to our mailing list if you want to get
| notified when it's ready: https://www.remove.bg/blog#subscribe
| md5person wrote:
| I think some of the artifacts on the video at 0:12 (handbag
| thing) are very noticeable. Same thing at 0:19 (cat)and at 0:28
| (cat again). Otherwise, looks nice :)
| groe wrote:
| Some scenes, foregrounds, backgrounds, lighting conditions,
| movements, etc work better than others - there's a lot of
| potential for errors in videos and the videos from the examples
| page are straight from Unscreen Pro. We're continuously working
| on improving the AI though (NB: We don't use video uploads for
| that - see unscreen.com/privacy)
| raobit wrote:
| Looks Great! How tool is built?using computer vision,image
| processing?
| groe wrote:
| It's a combination of deep learning and traditional computer
| vision algorithms. We do a lot of basic research, evaluate many
| different approaches, train them in dozens of variants and
| ultimately combine what performs best, then try to make it as
| easy to use as possible
| nixy wrote:
| This has been submitted multiple times as a "Show HN" but as it
| is a paid service, I guess this is a marketing strategy.
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=unscreen.com
| abalaji wrote:
| Doesn't this violate the spirit of Show HN? I thought only the
| authors could submit them unless they are all authors of the
| project.
| thekevan wrote:
| I feel like this could be presented in a much more engaging
| manner.
|
| There's one quick video on the main page which shows replacement
| backgrounds, but the "Examples" page shows about 15 or 16
| examples of the same thing, removing a background. It quickly
| gets to the point of "Ok yeah, so what? Show me something cool to
| do once the background is gone."
|
| I get that it may be difficult to remove a background the way
| this service does, but the customer is going to be less impressed
| with the fact that it works correctly than they are going to be
| about it having an actual engaging or useful purpose.
| manmal wrote:
| You can try it with an uploaded video or GIF here:
| https://www.unscreen.com/upload
| groe wrote:
| That's a great idea, thank you
| SEJeff wrote:
| This is sort of the inverse of gimp's "foreground select tool".
| It was a PHD thesis on the algorithm to select foregrounds that
| was contributed to the gimp photo editor as open source.
|
| https://docs.gimp.org/en/gimp-tool-foreground-select.html
|
| And the paper with an overview of the algorithm is here: "Image
| segementation by uniform color clustering"
|
| https://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/inst/pubs/tr-b-05-07.pdf
| [deleted]
| daertommy wrote:
| Product hunt is full of this kind of stuff, is there anything
| different on this project?
| dandigangi wrote:
| Whats the tech stack this was built on?
| jacknews wrote:
| $1.98 per MINUTE?
|
| I thought I'd woken up in 1980.
|
| But I guess this is aimed at people making professional video
| presentations etc rather than for webcam meetings.
|
| It seems to work pretty well, but none of the examples have any
| sudden movement, which is where there's often tearing etc.
| Insanity wrote:
| It works on pre-recorded video so webcam meetings are not their
| target market.
| jacknews wrote:
| Exactly as I concluded, and said above.
| groe wrote:
| Thanks a lot for your comments and feedback - some great great
| advice and ideas in here!
|
| This is the MVP release of Unscreen Pro, so there's many more
| things to come in the future, from quality improvements, to an
| API, integrations, editing tools and more. Appreciate all the
| inputs :)
| godmode2019 wrote:
| Looks cool, this model is start of the art I believe
| https://app.wandb.ai/stacey/greenscreen/reports/Two-Shots-to...
| motoboi wrote:
| I believe this is homegrow from their photo background-removal
| tool remove.bg
|
| Probably frame by frame, not real-time. But not less
| impressive.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2020-08-05 23:01 UTC)