[HN Gopher] C.I.A. Lacing (2014)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       C.I.A. Lacing (2014)
        
       Author : scrps
       Score  : 122 points
       Date   : 2020-08-08 13:13 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.fieggen.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.fieggen.com)
        
       | josefrichter wrote:
       | This is a joke, right? Shoes laced like this are immediately
       | noticeable and suspicious.
        
         | themodelplumber wrote:
         | Are they really that noticeable? Assume black laces--the yellow
         | in the illustrations is a callout effect rather than actual
         | lace color.
         | 
         | And if someone does notice, it seems a stretch that they would
         | be suspicious. You could say you were feeling a creative
         | streak. This is for message passing, not for wearing to GRU
         | interviews...
        
       | supernova87a wrote:
       | I believe today you just say "hey, the drop is ready" over
       | Signal.
        
         | willcipriano wrote:
         | Do you also send "the drop isn't ready" on other days? If not
         | the fact that you sent a message tells the attacker everything
         | without knowing the content.
         | 
         | Also can anything be inferred by the length of the signal
         | message? Do they pad they out or will all of the sudden sending
         | a 2kb vs 3kb message give you away that something is different?
         | 
         | Personally if my life is on the line, I'd stick with the
         | shoelaces.
        
           | ConsiderCrying wrote:
           | Especially handy if you don't know the number of the person
           | you need to contact or know their device has been
           | compromised. No need to rely on technology when a simple
           | trick will do the... erm, trick.
        
           | airstrike wrote:
           | Instead of using Signal you can just upload a specific meme
           | to /r/wallstreetbets
        
             | progre wrote:
             | Didn't the 9/11 hijackers communicate by uploading images
             | of basketball players to sports discussion boards?
        
               | arminiusreturns wrote:
               | Source if you have it please.
        
               | stordoff wrote:
               | Suggestions of coded messages/steganography were made,
               | but I'm struggling to find anything concrete:
               | 
               | > Suspected ringleader Mohamed Atta was seen repeatedly
               | by witnesses using his Hotmail account at public
               | libraries in Florida to surf the Internet, downloading
               | what appeared to be pictures of children and scenes of
               | the Middle East.[1]
               | 
               | > Many of the hijackers were frequent visitors to
               | libraries and internet cafes in Florida, where they are
               | believed to have received their final orders in coded
               | message.[2]
               | 
               | Pre-9/11:
               | 
               | > Through weeks of interviews with U.S. law-enforcement
               | officials and experts, USA TODAY has learned new details
               | of how extremists hide maps and photographs of terrorist
               | targets -- and post instructions for terrorist activities
               | -- on sports chat rooms, pornographic bulletin boards and
               | other popular Web sites.[3]
               | 
               | [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20011005232014/https://ab
               | cnews.g...
               | 
               | [2] https://www.theregister.com/2001/10/11/iomart_cashes_
               | in_on_w... ([1] and [2] found via
               | https://www.giac.org/paper/gsec/3494/steganography-age-
               | terro...)
               | 
               | [3] https://web.archive.org/web/20030606200613/http://www
               | .usatod... (found via
               | https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11308369.pdf)
        
               | arminiusreturns wrote:
               | I wouldn't doubt they used stenography too, was just
               | curious if you had a source. Thanks for the effort.
        
         | xwdv wrote:
         | Nope you can actually do it through traceroute far better.
        
       | cheerlessbog wrote:
       | Barely related, but if you haven't learned how to tie shoelaces
       | instantly, you should:
       | 
       | https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/ianknot.htm
       | 
       | I've been doing this for nearly 20 years.
        
         | kbenson wrote:
         | I learned about that knot (and about how the directionality of
         | the traditional shoelace knot we learn matters for how secure
         | it is) a year or two ago from HN. Unfortunately, I probably
         | haven't worn anything with laces in more than 9 months. I'm a
         | flip-flip kinda guy most the time, and when you combine that
         | with me getting some boat shoes a while back and shelter-in-
         | place...
        
           | YeGoblynQueenne wrote:
           | May I ask, why do you say "flip-flip"? I thought the name of
           | that footwear is "flip-flop"?
        
             | corndoge wrote:
             | Maybe because "i" is right next to "o" on qwerty?
        
       | rolph wrote:
       | these types of signals can be assigned different meanings, from
       | day to day depending on briefings.
       | 
       | it is also possible to depict roman numerals with lace patterns,
       | and using under/over eyelet lacing to further increase to
       | combinations or provide a bit of stego in the mix. you can send a
       | shill signal with X's and a real signal with laces through
       | eyelets.
       | 
       | these sorts of things are used popularily and certain
       | affiliations creedos or type of date your looking for in a fetish
       | bar are often communicated by display of accessories.
       | 
       | so its not a big secret anymore its just a matter of getting the
       | context of the signal. so how you lace your shoes has different
       | meaning in a night club than in front of the embassy
        
       | ferros wrote:
       | How covert is staring at someone's shoes trying to identify
       | slight variations?
        
         | almondgold wrote:
         | Probably knew which variations to look for on top of looking
         | for slight hints, while trying to show a lacking sign of
         | confidence by looking down.
        
         | elliekelly wrote:
         | If you scroll down to the "CIA Lacing Gallery" you can see that
         | on men's dress shoes the different lacing techniques would be
         | pretty obvious with a quick glance. The laces are either - or X
         | 
         | Direct link to one of the photos:
         | https://www.fieggen.com/Dont_Link/CIALacing1a.jpg
        
           | jmnicolas wrote:
           | It depends where it happens : if it's a sitting meeting yes
           | it would look strange. But in the street do you even look at
           | passing people shoelaces ?
        
             | pc86 wrote:
             | If you're a spy and one of your assets is passing you a
             | message, then of course you would.
             | 
             | And if that's not the case, _you 're probably not looking
             | at other people's shoelaces_ - which is the entire point.
        
         | function_seven wrote:
         | Well, don't _stare_ at them. You know in advance that your
         | contact will be walking down Merriweather Lane at 11:30am. If
         | his shoes sport a single  "X" near the bottom, that means the
         | dead drop has the microfilm ready for pickup. If it doesn't
         | have that "X", then try again next Tuesday.
         | 
         | If you see two X's in his lacing, the package is at the
         | alternate drop site.
         | 
         | If he has 3 X patterns, you're burned! Make your way to the
         | safehouse after losing any potential tails.
         | 
         | Glance quickly, agent, and keep moving.
        
           | ferros wrote:
           | Thanks for explaining like this. It seems from the downvotes
           | to my comment most people don't see it as a valid question.
        
             | NetOpWibby wrote:
             | Par for the course here. Glad your question was answered, I
             | was curious as well.
        
           | unixhero wrote:
           | Excellent description. Love it. I couldn't understand the
           | website description of this technique.
        
           | hinkley wrote:
           | Sit at a cafe reading a paper or the menu, but look past it
           | at the ground?
        
             | rzzzt wrote:
             | Use the standard issue prop newspaper with holes cut out
             | for the eyes.
        
           | sandworm101 wrote:
           | The X as a signal is a big deal.
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JMHrrSshgc
        
           | stordoff wrote:
           | This setup reminds me of operation PIMLICO:
           | 
           | > Every Tuesday, shortly after 7:00, a British MI6 officer
           | would take a morning stroll at the Kutuzovsky Prospekt in
           | Moscow. He would pass outside a designated bakery at exactly
           | 7:24 a.m. local time. If he saw Gordievsky standing outside
           | the bakery holding a grocery bag, it meant that the double
           | agent was requesting to be exfiltrated as a matter of
           | urgency. Gordievsky would then have to wait outside the
           | bakery until a second MI6 officer appeared, carrying a bag
           | from the Harrods luxury department store in London. The man
           | would also be carrying a Mars bar (a popular British candy
           | bar) and would bite into it while passing right in front of
           | Gordievsky. That would be a message to him that his request
           | to be exfiltrated had been received.
           | 
           | https://intelnews.org/tag/operation-pimlico/
        
             | markdown wrote:
             | That was poorly conceived. They'd have to keep those things
             | stored somewhere for as long as the spy was active. What if
             | a rat ate the last Mars bar at 6:00am?
        
               | iooi wrote:
               | Obviously HN always knows better, this reminds me of the
               | Dropbox post.
               | 
               | There's a great book that covers every single aspect of
               | this escape, "The Spy and the Traitor" by Ben Macintyre.
               | Rest assured that the British embassy had plenty of Mars
               | bars and Harrods bags for this signal!
        
               | kortilla wrote:
               | Tell the rats that the Mars bars are off limits and they
               | can stick to the Cadbury chocolates.
        
             | TheOtherHobbes wrote:
             | This seems either unlikely or questionably competent.
             | Gordievsky was well known to the KGB and loitering
             | pointlessly outside a bakery would only have aroused
             | suspicions - which would have been confirmed by the second
             | agent, because anyone carrying a Harrods bag in Soviet
             | Moscow would have stood out like a very obvious person of
             | interest.
        
               | oh_sigh wrote:
               | It could be a matter of routine: Leave your house at
               | 7:00AM every morning. Walk 15 minutes to the bakery.
               | Order and be out the bakery door by 7:20AM. In normal
               | circumstances, you just leave and go about your day. Only
               | once would you stand around for an extra 4 minutes - say
               | reading a paper, or eating what you just bought.
               | Otherwise it looks like a normal routine.
        
         | sandworm101 wrote:
         | >> someone's shoes trying to identify slight variations?
         | 
         | If you have a military background it is completely normal.
         | Beyond boot polishing, how one ties one's shoes can identify
         | their nationality, background and even trade. They don't think
         | twice about looking at someone's shoes.
         | 
         | There is an old method for spotting a US marine: Ask them to
         | change their socks. The guy who takes one sock off at a time,
         | changing one sock before even untying the second shoe, that's a
         | probable marine. The guy who doesn't actually tie his laces,
         | that does a strange wrap-around-then-tuck thing... US army. The
         | guy who skips a few holes in the middle: air force.
         | 
         | Think I am exaggerating? search youtube for military shoe tying
         | vids:
         | https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=military+shoe+l...
        
           | NautilusWave wrote:
           | Well that sounds like a very specific scene.
        
           | aasasd wrote:
           | In fact, Ian's Shoelace website mentions several lacing and
           | tying methods used and prescribed in the military of
           | different countries.
        
         | StefanKarpinski wrote:
         | Take a picture, it will last longer
        
         | chrismeller wrote:
         | You've clearly never been in the Eastern European countries.
         | Eye contact is... iffy.
         | 
         | There is an old joke. How do you tell an extroverted Estonian
         | from an introverted Estonian? He stares at your shoes, not his
         | own.
         | 
         | There are (at least now) plenty of "extroverted" Estonians, but
         | I've heard dozens and dozens of stories of the "don't make eye
         | contact, just keep walking" variety during the USSR.
         | 
         | Also, staring at either party's shoes may mean their own
         | smartphone these days...
        
           | aasasd wrote:
           | Well, there's the answer for whether Estonia is a Nordic
           | country.
           | 
           | For the reference: https://images-
           | cdn.9gag.com/photo/aj6MYgw_700b_v1.jpg
           | 
           | https://external-preview.redd.it/UMjBaFaE-
           | dFYMu_VZ8nKO4_tj0E...
           | 
           | http://www.linkbcit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Finland-
           | bu...
        
             | pantalaimon wrote:
             | Those images are much more commonplace these days
        
         | searchableguy wrote:
         | I sometimes wonder if FBI and other agencies release fake
         | information so we all look out for them rather than their
         | actual secret methods.
        
           | c3534l wrote:
           | They absolutely do. And they might release very good
           | information along with a carefully planted piece of terrible
           | advice. So you might see a tutorial about how to send drugs
           | through the mail that is 99% good advice, and one piece of
           | intentionally bad advice that police officers are currently
           | watching extra carefully. You don't have to get very high up
           | in government to see examples of people planting false
           | information to lead people astray about how things really
           | work.
        
           | jmnicolas wrote:
           | True story : I was devastated to learn that eating carrots
           | for enhancing night vision was a WWII British hoax to confuse
           | the Germans.
           | 
           | I spent the better part of my teenage years eating raw
           | carrots to be a better Ninja!
        
             | kbenson wrote:
             | You and me both! I mean, I like carrots, so I was eating
             | them as a snack (my preferred method was to get a full
             | carrot, eat around the core, and then eat the sweet core by
             | itself), but I remember thinking whenever I got one "I
             | wonder how much this will end up helping my vision" some
             | day.
        
             | LeoPanthera wrote:
             | That's true! To be more specific, the British had just
             | invented the ground interception radar to spot incoming
             | aircraft, and didn't want the Germans to think they had
             | developed a technological solution.
             | 
             | I don't know if they ever thought the myth would catch on
             | as well as it did, but it's still widely believed today.
             | (Perhaps because there's no downside, eating carrots is
             | still good for you, it just doesn't improve your eyesight.)
        
               | ThePadawan wrote:
               | Additionally, sugar was also heavily rationed, while
               | carrots (which are quite high in sugars) IIRC weren't.
               | 
               | Carrot cake also had a surge in popularity at the time
               | (if the great show "Supersizers eat..." is to believed).
        
               | throwaway_pdp09 wrote:
               | Huh. Didn't know. Proof
               | http://www.carrotmuseum.co.uk/ww2carrots.html
        
             | ahmedfromtunis wrote:
             | > Decades later rumors swirled that the British Royal Air
             | Force pushed that message as a cover-up for the recently
             | adopted radar technology they were secretly relying on for
             | their nighttime skirmishes.
             | 
             | > whilst the [British] Air Ministry were happy to go along
             | with the story [of carrot-improved vision], they never set
             | out to use it to fool the Germans.
             | 
             | > The German intelligence service were well aware of our
             | ground-based radar installation and would not be surprised
             | by the existence of radar in aircraft. In fact, the RAF
             | were able to confirm the existence of German airborne radar
             | simply by fitting commercial radios into a bomber and
             | flying over France listening to the various radio
             | frequencies!
             | 
             | Link: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-or-
             | fiction-c...
             | 
             | I wasn't however able to find if there is any reason for
             | the british to push such a message if it wasn't to confuse
             | the germans.
        
               | messe wrote:
               | > I wasn't however able to find if there is any reason
               | for the british to push such a message if it wasn't to
               | confuse the germans.
               | 
               | Could it have had something to do with rationing? Perhaps
               | they were trying to increase carrot consumption.
        
               | ahmedfromtunis wrote:
               | Yep, that's what I thought too, but had no way of
               | confirming it.
               | 
               | It can also be that they wanted citizens to cultivate
               | more of it in their home gardens for its nutritional
               | values. But either way, I have no data to confirm it.
        
       | mhh__ wrote:
       | The system MI6 used to communicate with Oleg Gordievsky was that,
       | had he decided to escape, he would stand near a bread shop in
       | Moscow carrying a Safeway's bag and an MI6 handler (who had never
       | seen him before keep in mind) would walk past eating either a
       | mars bar or a kit kat.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-08-08 23:00 UTC)