[HN Gopher] Africa declared free of wild polio
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Africa declared free of wild polio
        
       Author : riffraff
       Score  : 490 points
       Date   : 2020-08-25 17:15 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
        
       | rmason wrote:
       | My generation was the first to be spared from polio. But I had
       | relatives that were not as lucky. I knew kids just a few years
       | older than me who lived in iron lungs. This is a massive
       | accomplishment that should be celebrated.
        
       | tus88 wrote:
       | Is there some other kind of polio still rampant?
        
       | melling wrote:
       | Now the world needs to go after malaria in Africa.
       | 
       | Throughout the world a child dies every 2 minutes from malaria.
       | 
       | https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/08/infectious-diseases-c...
       | 
       | I've been to South Africa twice. Most other Subsaharan countries
       | have large malaria problems.
       | 
       | Looking forward to that not being a problem in my lifetime.
        
         | mikorym wrote:
         | I grew up in an area that forms part of the general malaria
         | area of South Africa, but I have never had malaria. I know many
         | people who have had malaria and the general observations that I
         | have is:
         | 
         | 1. Using malaria medication is advisable if you don't have
         | access to good doctors and good hospitals. If you permanently
         | live in a malaria area, it's not practical.
         | 
         | 2. If you have quick access to a good doctors and good
         | hospitals, it's often better to treat yourself once you are
         | sick. ---> _NO_ this is not travel advice  <---. The malaria
         | medications have a lot of side effects to use permanently; the
         | expensive ones have less side effects and I believe pilots
         | generally use such ones since risking getting sick has the
         | potential side effect of a plane crashing.
         | 
         | 3. The key is detection and treatment. You can _easily die_ in
         | an top EU or US or Singapore hospital if the doctor doesn 't
         | ever see malaria and you happen to have it. You have to test
         | until you get a positive---even if it is a false positive, and
         | then you test again. I personally know people who's parent died
         | of malaria in a good hospital in South Africa, but in an area
         | that is far from the malaria areas, and hence has doctors who
         | don't test for it. I am not a doctor so I am not sure how one
         | is treated once tested positive, but I do know many people who
         | recovered very quickly due to the doctors being acutely aware
         | of how to treat malaria.
         | 
         | 4. Taking into account said things above, malaria is not a
         | major threat. If you read stories about game rangers in the KNP
         | of South Africa, many of them died from malaria in their later
         | life because they were somewhere deep in the bush/lowveld and
         | far from hospitals and couldn't be bothered with having
         | malaria, yet again, and stopping their fun bush activities to
         | go to the hospital 200km away.
         | 
         | 5. My grandmother had malaria 6 or 7 times and died rather
         | healthy in her mid 90s. My family actually actively avoided the
         | malaria areas in the summer back in the late 1800s and early to
         | mid 1900s by living on the higher escarpment. You could also
         | read about Dr. Annecke and the efforts back then to combat
         | malaria.
         | 
         | 6. The countries to the north of South Africa don't have the
         | facilities to treat malaria, generally, and with proper
         | treatment and selective DTT application, you should be able to
         | limit the ranges of the parasite. Yes, DTT _is_ a bad chemical.
         | 
         | 7. On that topic, malaria is caused by a parasite, so in terms
         | of vaccines it's not clear what the mechanism behind it should
         | be.
         | 
         | 8. If you think about the Panama worm exclusion line that
         | featured a while ago on HN, something like that would have made
         | sense if Africa were a more developed continent. But in any
         | case, the point is that the poor state of many things in Africa
         | is part of the malaria problem.
         | 
         | 9. Many other things about Africa is way cooler than the other
         | continents. We still have lion and rhino, for one. There were
         | many large predators on the other continents. So, "development"
         | is something of a complicated word.
         | 
         | 10. South Africa generally manages malaria well, so it is
         | possible to contain it through holistic management. And no,
         | holism is a word that belongs to Jan Smuts and you cannot steal
         | it for your magic peanut oil business.
         | 
         | 11. Yes, a silver bullet would be nice.
        
         | coldpie wrote:
         | > Now the world needs to go after malaria in Africa.
         | 
         | They are. Take a moment to celebrate this victory :)
        
           | melling wrote:
           | We are so close to wiping polio out globally. Bill Gates has
           | been trying hard. A few cases in Asia every year and we're
           | done.
           | 
           | Probably less than 100 globally in a few countries. Bill
           | Gates will get it.
           | 
           | Anyway, while it's great, and we should be happy, 400,000
           | kids will die from malaria in Africa this year.
           | 
           | We could do more to save millions of lives over the next 10
           | years.
        
             | MaximumYComb wrote:
             | It's because he is looking long term. Once you eradicate
             | polio then it's gone forever. If he stops now to save more
             | children from malaria instead then polio will return and
             | the work so far wasted.
        
             | hu3 wrote:
             | I often see citations of Bill Gates charity being downvoted
             | to oblivion on HN and I can never figure out why.
             | 
             | Would appreciate if someone could enlighten me. Surely
             | there must be a good reason.
        
               | spacephysics wrote:
               | Without disclosing my opinions/take on Bill Gates, I
               | think some see his charity as a means to gain power in
               | specific regions to [insert conspiracy theory].
               | 
               | A tangentially related matter I see cited more often than
               | not in these circles, are about an uptick in vaccine-
               | caused paralysis occurring in India, causing the
               | foundation to be kicked out.
               | 
               | The argument being that an uptick in "non-polio acute
               | flaccid paralysis" (NPAFP) was recorded in areas where
               | the oral vaccine was distributed, and this subsequently
               | got the foundation "kicked out of India" (quoted because,
               | as source below states, this is false) [0]
               | 
               | [0] https://fullfact.org/online/gates-polio-vaccine/
        
               | AndrewBissell wrote:
               | There's no need to refer to "conspiracy theories"
               | (although Bill Gates's close ties to Jeffrey Epstein
               | after his 2007 trafficking conviction did not do him any
               | favors there). The ulterior purposes of the Gates
               | Foundation are pursued mostly in the open:
               | 
               | https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-
               | foundat...
               | 
               | https://www.cjr.org/criticism/gates-foundation-
               | journalism-fu...
        
               | mullingitover wrote:
               | That The Nation article seems to be implying that Gates
               | is dodging his civic duties to pay taxes and support nice
               | things like public infrastructure, but at the same time
               | he's also avoiding paying for terrible things like
               | funding the military which bombs things like weddings and
               | Medecins Sans Frontieres hospitals.
               | 
               | Gates has done some shady things in his day, but I can't
               | fault him for that one. His fortune is a drop in the
               | bucket of the federal budget, but being able to control
               | and target his charity makes a hell of a lot of
               | difference in the world. It's not like the federal
               | government was going to cure polio in Africa, but for a
               | few billion more dollars in tax revenue.
        
               | koonsolo wrote:
               | It has everything to do with people's perspective of the
               | world: rich people cannot be good people. If you gain
               | something, somebody else needs to lose something. So for
               | a rich person to get rich, he must have taken a lot from
               | other, "nicer" people.
               | 
               | Bill gates must really love swimming "uncle
               | scrooge"-style in his billions. That's all he cares
               | about. Everything he does must be to gain more billions,
               | so he can swim in a bigger pool.
               | 
               | Bill was also super competitive, so let's focus on that
               | and forget that he made his money providing value to
               | users and businesses. It's better to act like he stole
               | the money in an unfair way.
               | 
               | I personally feel very sad for a person that can't
               | imagine that someone else could feel happy and satisfied
               | by helping others, by having a huge impact on peoples
               | lives in a positive way. I'm sure Bill and Melinda get
               | more satisfaction of helping other people than looking at
               | numbers on their bank account. But hey, that's not
               | possible because he's rich, and therefore evil.
        
               | phenkdo wrote:
               | It is at its core, the issue of the perfect being the
               | enemy of the good. Bill might be an imperfect angel, but
               | he is an angel nonetheless in spending his fortune to
               | help millions/billions out of abject poverty and
               | suffering. That dwarfs almost any effort by other people.
               | 
               | You could psychoanalyze this as acts of redemption,
               | guilty conscience, seeking further world domination or
               | whatnot, However it's undeniable he's helped many, many
               | people and far, far,far more than his keyboard detractors
               | ever would or could. And that's a very good thing IMHO.
        
               | _jal wrote:
               | People dislike him for a number of reasons. I despised
               | his actions through most of his tenure at M$. He
               | destroyed some things I cared about and tried hard to
               | destroy others, and I was nowhere near them and didn't
               | use their products.
               | 
               | I'm not really big on the idea of 'redemption' - my
               | actions today do not erase what I've done in the past.
               | But he has lived a pretty decent life since then, and
               | tried to do good things. So good on him.
               | 
               | Others hold grudges longer.
        
               | dylz wrote:
               | My assumption is that there are people that dislike how
               | Gates earned his money.
        
               | woodruffw wrote:
               | I didn't downvote this (and don't generally do so), but
               | here's a line of reasoning that might explain it:
               | something has to go _seriously wrong_ in the world for
               | the lives of millions of people to be contingent upon the
               | charitable sentiments of one obscenely wealthy man. Put
               | another way: regardless of whether he 's doing good, it
               | _shouldn 't_ be the case that polio eradication _depends_
               | on his material wealth.
               | 
               | Celebrating the beneficial outcomes of Bill Gates'
               | charity without reflecting on _why_ he 's able to give
               | away billions of dollars without breaking a sweat invites
               | us to ignore the fact that the system that enriched Bill
               | Gates doesn't actually encourage him to do any good (and
               | actually involved him doing quite a lot of _harm_ ).
        
               | rowanG077 wrote:
               | I have the opposite sentiment. Things have been going
               | extremely right for a single person to be able to go out
               | and destroy issues that literately thousands upon
               | thousands of people are affected by. Since governments of
               | the developed world are mostly democratic no action to
               | fix those issues in other countries is taken. This would
               | have not otherwise been possible.
        
               | abraae wrote:
               | Bill gates did indeed do "quite a lot of harm" to many
               | businesses and I have cursed his name many times while
               | wrestling with some Microsoft chicanery.
               | 
               | But that harm was done to competitors, on the business
               | field. The people who became collateral damage could
               | always go and get jobs at some other company. The
               | companies suffered and sometimes died but such is the way
               | of capitalism.
               | 
               | If the upside was that his money gets redistributed to
               | the genuinely poor and needy, who don't have any
               | opportunity to earn for themselves in some cushy IT job,
               | then I'm personally OK with it.
               | 
               | (I forget the specifics, but a piece of ancient code we
               | wrote included a dummy assignment to a variable called
               | BILLGATESBOLLOCKS, to get around some MS devilment).
        
               | pm90 wrote:
               | It's good that he's a billionaire that uses his wealth
               | for truly great humanitarian causes. However, he is an
               | exception and most billionaires don't do this. And they
               | probably shouldn't have to, if we created a system that
               | doesn't allow for this kind of obscene enrichment of
               | individuals.
        
               | petra wrote:
               | Given the incentives, isn't this a Robin Hood story ?
               | Bill Gates, Robbing the rich to give to the poor ?
               | 
               | But the problem is that we are those rich people. We as
               | tech people have suffered under the microsoft monopoly.
               | Heck, we still suffer, from the horrors of windows 10, to
               | browser incompatibilities, etc.
               | 
               | So we hate Microsoft. So it's hard to love Bill.
        
               | vlunkr wrote:
               | Never has the phrase "first-world problems" been so
               | applicable.
        
               | monetus wrote:
               | I would assume there to be a multitude of bad reasons,
               | but as for a good one.. If you forced me to pick one
               | driving one, the perception that he is laundering his
               | reputation through philanthrophy would hopefully be it.
               | 
               | A good act does not wash out the bad, nor a bad the good.
        
               | strictnein wrote:
               | His reputation didn't really need "laundering". He ran a
               | software company, sometimes aggressively, but people act
               | like he ran a private military corporation and trafficked
               | in blood diamonds.
        
               | vlunkr wrote:
               | Agreed, outside of unix-like tech circles, I don't know
               | that his reputation was ever that bad.
        
               | soperj wrote:
               | Because it doesn't just do good. It's completely screwed
               | up public education in the states for instance.
        
             | brudgers wrote:
             | Bill Gates got involved with polio via $100 million
             | matching fund to Rotary International about a decade ago.
             | It was one of the foundation's early healthcare initiatives
             | and leveraged several decades of work by Rotarians around
             | the world...polio eradication was the major project of
             | Rotary at the time.
             | 
             | Malaria is different in that there was not the same level
             | of eradication infrastructure to leverage and different
             | because it touches on drinking water and food chains in the
             | non-human environment. Malaria is not mostly a vaccine
             | distribution problem.
        
             | strictnein wrote:
             | Bill Gates is also very, very heavily involved with
             | defeating Malaria in Africa.
             | 
             | His foundation has spent $2.9 Billion so far on it.
             | 
             | https://www.gatesfoundation.org/what-we-do/global-
             | health/mal...
        
               | jacobwilliamroy wrote:
               | I dont know how heavily involved he is. The man is a
               | signature on a check. He has no medical credentials. All
               | his fortune is built on stolen ip. He just writes checks.
        
               | ehsankia wrote:
               | > I dont know
               | 
               | Well good thing you started with that since you are
               | clearly not familiar with him at all. He is very very
               | well read and highly involved with the charity.
        
               | jacobwilliamroy wrote:
               | Whatever. The man runs a vertically integrated monopoly
               | which has been evading taxes for decades. You all need to
               | quit with this blind hero worship for rich people. Sure
               | he's saving Africa, but he fucked america first, and that
               | makes all his spending and reading very underwhelming to
               | me.
        
               | dctoedt wrote:
               | > _but he fucked america first_
               | 
               | I dunno: He played a crucial role in a long-term,
               | industry-wide collaboration that resulted in practically
               | every household having _at least_ one computer. And for
               | years he 's been devoting his fortune and his intellect
               | to solving global-scale problems. That has gotta be worth
               | _some_ redemptive value for past sins, yes?
        
               | jacobwilliamroy wrote:
               | Im not catholic, so I dont believe in redemption through
               | third parties. The courts dont either. Jus ex injuria non
               | oritur. Just acts do not follow unjust acts. Even if we
               | do good with our ill gotten gains, we are still
               | accountable for our own actions. The sentence for tax
               | evasion is not "Donating to malaria research" and anyone
               | else who had microsoft's numbers would have been
               | destroyed.
               | 
               | Oh and that "computer in every home" crap? That's the
               | monopoly! Microsoft is so big it competes with its own
               | products. That's why it's untouchable. How are you going
               | to audit microsoft when the IRS runs office 2010 on
               | legacy copies of windows 7? This humanitarian stuff is
               | just smoke and mirrors. A glamour cast on the american
               | people.
        
               | EGreg wrote:
               | All these anti vaxxer people are also pushing HCQ ... but
               | it actually does prevent Malaria. If not for the side
               | effects that compound over time, if the body was able to
               | flush it out somehow, it could be very useful, no?
               | 
               | That or finding ways to sterilize all anopheles
               | mosquitoes, or do other mosquitoes carry it also
        
               | dnautics wrote:
               | IIRC malaria in africa is basically totally resistant to
               | HCQ by now. There's places where resistance to
               | Artemisinin is a thing.
        
               | robbiep wrote:
               | It's called the advancement of science and it's one of
               | the reasons it is not generally a frontline treatment
               | (because we have more effective treatments now, as well
               | as resistance).
               | 
               | You might as well say that a person is too phlegmatic and
               | needs bleeding when they have gallstones.
               | 
               | The world moves, move with it
        
             | tonfa wrote:
             | > A few cases in Asia every year and we're done
             | 
             | We also need to get rid of a vaccine-derived polio in
             | Africa (and some places in Asia).
        
             | HiroshiSan wrote:
             | Not to take anything away from Bill, but why isn't Melinda
             | mentioned just as much in these types of conversations?
        
               | JamesBarney wrote:
               | Are you really curious?
               | 
               | It's the same reason that if Oprah took her billions to
               | try and solve some global problem with her husband
               | Stedman, many mentions of the work they were doing would
               | not mention Stedman.
               | 
               | One is a famous individual who built up an obscene
               | fortune, and the other person is married to them. And
               | despite how involved their partner is deploying that
               | wealth for the good of the world, people are just not
               | going to mention the less famous one who didn't build up
               | the fortune as often.
        
               | graeme wrote:
               | There are many reasons, but one specific to Hacker News
               | is that Bill Gates writes articles that are posted on
               | Hacker News.
               | 
               | Bill Gates also regularly gives speeches. I checked and
               | Melinda doesn't have any on youtube since 2013.
               | 
               | So Bill is very much the public face of the foundation,
               | even though Melinda is equally active and her name is in
               | its name.
               | 
               | Not the only reason, but worth pointing out a prominent
               | benign one.
               | 
               | For instance, a parallel example is how ycombinator is
               | often mentioned as being founded by Paul Graham, and
               | Jessica Livingstone is left out. Why? Partly sexism of
               | course. But Paul also was the public face of YC with his
               | essays.
               | 
               | And we have evidence it's not just sexism, because YC had
               | _four_ founders
               | 
               | > by Paul Graham, Jessica Livingston, Trevor Blackwell,
               | and Robert Tappan Morris.
               | 
               | I think the second two are even less well known than
               | Jessica Livingstone, and this correlates with how much
               | public writing and speaking she's done as the face of YC
               | and about startups.
               | 
               | (There's a whole other discussion to be had about whether
               | women are chased out of the public sphere, but this
               | comment is long enough)
        
               | zapdrive wrote:
               | Why should she be?
        
               | pm90 wrote:
               | He is the public face of the foundation, giving ted talks
               | and tweeting about it etc.
        
         | mrmonkeyman wrote:
         | "The world" doesn't need to do shit.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | Symmetry wrote:
       | Hey polio, hope you can say hello to smallpox for us soon.
        
       | sparrish wrote:
       | This is the best news I've heard in weeks. What a great milestone
       | and a wonderful world we live in. Congrats to all the NGOs,
       | African and international, that worked so hard.
        
         | lucb1e wrote:
         | For more uplifting news, I spent a few hours today diving into
         | figures about human development for a small project about
         | greatest differences between neighbouring countries. They're
         | basically all going up. Aside from countries at war (e.g.
         | Syria) and minor setbacks like 2008, we're doing better all the
         | time. I actually made a wallpaper from one of them:
         | 
         | https://lucb1e.com/tmp/hn-whatsthisgraph.png What does this
         | show?
         | 
         | Answer in rot13: Rnpu yvar vf n pbhagel, fubjvat yvsr
         | rkcrpgnapl ng ovegu. Gurer ner fbzr boivbhf bhgyvref ohg
         | 'orgjrra gur yvarf' vf nyfb n pbhagel gung qrpyvarq funecyl:
         | Flevn. Yrg'f whfg abg qb jne ntnva, 'xnl?
         | 
         | You can find this graph interactively on the United Nations
         | Development Programme website: http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
         | (this graph can be found in (rot13) urnygu -> yvsr rkcrpgnapl
         | ng ovegu).
        
       | tsewlliw wrote:
       | Here's hoping we double down on Polio efforts and ensure it is
       | entirely eliminated. Finishing is super important, and this
       | milestone shows this is something humanity can finish.
        
         | baybal2 wrote:
         | Especially in light of what is happening in Pakistan, and India
         | now. Polio was "almost" done there in all, but a few most
         | remote, and backward areas.
         | 
         | And it was exactly because these tiny reservoirs were left, it
         | came back to Karachi, and Mumbai.
        
       | yyyk wrote:
       | Good, but I am unaware of any good solution to the endemic AfPak
       | area. This is IMHO a mirror of world trends: Africa seems to be
       | getting better (if slowly), but parts of Asia are slipping
       | behind. It's possible that the program is in an undeclared race:
       | Can we eliminate polio before these areas get even worse?
        
       | microcolonel wrote:
       | Massive congratulations! Let's see about malaria next.
       | 
       | I have heard that it might not be crazy to apply DDT sparingly
       | and appropriately to this problem. To my knowledge, it was a big
       | part of how mosquito-borne disease was virtually eradicated in
       | North America.
       | 
       | Wetland habitat destruction is a real concern, but so is the
       | untimely deaths of hundreds of millions of people.
        
       | tempsy wrote:
       | more children had been getting polio from polio vaccines than
       | getting it in the wild for a long time
        
         | renewiltord wrote:
         | Well, yes, that's what it means to get close to eradicating a
         | wild disease. There's a sort of hysteresis effect so it's hard
         | to instantly swap to not vaccinating and you want to ensure
         | that there are no local populations with wild transmission.
        
           | gus_massa wrote:
           | Oversimplifying, after some years without cases, you change
           | from the oral (attenuated virus) vaccine to the injectable
           | (totally inactivated) vaccine, to solve the risk of the
           | vaccine derived cases.
        
         | celticninja wrote:
         | I don't know about 'for a long time' but for a certain time
         | frame this is true[0].
         | 
         | However we are talking about there being 21 cases of this
         | occurring compared to pre-eradication infection levels in the
         | 100's of thousands per year. So whilst your statement is sort
         | of true, it is willfully misleading.
         | 
         | [0]https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/5344030
         | ...
        
         | yokaze wrote:
         | If you consider three years a long time... [1] Or are you
         | speaking of a particular area with poor sanitation and low
         | vaccination rates in the world?
         | 
         | And to be clear about it, children are not getting it by
         | getting vaccinated, unvaccinated people can get it from
         | recently vaccinated ones.
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polio_vaccine#Vaccine-
         | induced_...
        
           | werber wrote:
           | That just got a post COVID doomsday scenario playing out in
           | my head, I had never considered being contagious due to being
           | vaccinated.
        
             | nsgi wrote:
             | The coronavirus vaccine is unlikely to be a live attenuated
             | one, or if it is it will most likely be one that cannot
             | cause the disease.
        
             | vanderZwan wrote:
             | You are not going to be vaccinated by a weakened COVID
             | virus, so worrying about that is absurd.
        
             | dilippkumar wrote:
             | My understanding is that the vaccination candidates are all
             | taking some other virus and splicing it to add the
             | coronavirus's spike protien to it.
             | 
             | The idea is that the body will (hopefully) learn to
             | identify the spike and mount an immune response to that
             | spike protien.
             | 
             | Then, when a real coronavirus comes along, the body
             | responds to the spike protien on that virus.
             | 
             | PS: I'm not in the field, I might have missed some
             | vaccination effort that's using the real virus itself.
        
           | est31 wrote:
           | In the US it's been the case since the 70s, with the last
           | wild type polio case in 1984 and vaccine derived polio cases
           | up until 1999. [0] [1].
           | 
           | Then in 2000, OPV was banned in the US. [2]
           | 
           | But the statement, while true, is misleading because of its
           | intention to discredit the use of vaccines at all. Just check
           | the graphs linked before the introduction of the vaccine.
           | Night and day, as horrible as the vaccine caused cases are.
           | 
           | [0]: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00045949.htm#0
           | 0001...
           | 
           | [1]: https://www.virology.ws/2015/09/10/why-do-we-still-use-
           | sabin...
           | 
           | [2]: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/polio/public/index.html
        
         | SketchySeaBeast wrote:
         | This feels like a "Less people are dying in the car crush, but
         | now people are getting hurt from seat-belts" kind of problem.
        
         | eloff wrote:
         | Possibly, but the vaccines have prevented many orders of
         | magnitude more cases: "Since 2000, more than 10 billion doses
         | of OPV have been administered to nearly 3 billion children
         | worldwide. As a result, more than 13 million cases of polio
         | have been prevented, and the disease has been reduced by more
         | than 99%. During that time, 24 circulating vaccine-derived
         | poliovirus (cVDPV) outbreaks occurred in 21 countries,
         | resulting in fewer than 760 VDPV cases."[1]
         | 
         | [1] https://www.who.int/westernpacific/news/q-a-detail/what-
         | is-v...
        
           | tboyd47 wrote:
           | There were only 350,000 cases in 1988, when the vaccine was
           | first deployed, and 5 billion people on Earth then versus 7
           | billion now. How do 350,000 cases turn into 13 million,
           | according to the WHO?
           | 
           | [1] https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-
           | sheets/detail/poliomyelit...
        
             | DiogenesKynikos wrote:
             | 350,000 cases/year * 32 years = 11.2 million cases, which
             | is in the right ballpark, assuming we're counting from
             | 1988.
        
             | gus_massa wrote:
             | 350,000 cases/year * 32 years = 11.2 million cases
             | 
             | They may have some more precise method, but with this
             | estimation 11 or 13 millions doesn't seams to be too off.
        
         | vanderZwan wrote:
         | You know what they say: extraordinary claims require
         | extraordinary evidence. Based on what data do you make this
         | statement?
        
           | ars wrote:
           | Data: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polio_eradication#2020
           | 
           | In 2020 there were 102 wild cases, and 295 vaccine derived
           | cases. You have to go back to 2016 for wild cases to
           | outnumber vaccine cases.
           | 
           | He's getting downvoted for the tone: People are assuming he
           | is discrediting the vaccine by saying that. I personally
           | don't see that implication, I just see a bare, and correct,
           | fact.
        
             | gus_massa wrote:
             | Short version of the data:                        wild
             | vaccine-derived       2015:    74   32       2016:    37
             | 5       2017:    22   96       2018:    33  104       2019:
             | 165  365       2020:   102  291
             | 
             | >>> _more children had been getting polio from polio
             | vaccines than getting it in the wild for a long time_
             | 
             | I think that it is misleading to call the last four years
             | "a long time".
        
           | rowanseymour wrote:
           | Many poorer countries have relied on cheaper forms of the
           | polio vaccine with a weakened virus, which can sometimes
           | cause small outbreaks.
           | 
           | Ironically this fact is often used the anti-vaxxers as an
           | argument against vaccines.. when it's only been true because
           | polio vaccination has been so successful at eradicating the
           | real virus which was causing considerably more problems.
        
             | tialaramex wrote:
             | The oral vaccine is not only cheaper it also works better.
             | This means if you have endemic Polio it can make good sense
             | to deploy OPV even knowing that there is risk of it
             | reverting. The rich industrialised countries that switched
             | to the boring inactivated vaccine don't have endemic Polio
             | so the risk structure is different (as well as being able
             | to afford the more expensive product).
             | 
             | It's not entirely clear why OPV is more effective, but
             | perhaps it matters that you eat it (when I was a child it
             | was administered as a sugar lump) and so the attenuated
             | virus is entering the body via the gut, exactly where a
             | real working polio virus infects people. The more expensive
             | killed vaccine is injected into a muscle instead.
        
           | tgb wrote:
           | I was surprised too, but the WHO backs up the existence of
           | "vaccine-associated paralytic polio", though I'm finding some
           | conflicting numbers it's on the order of 1 in a million
           | paralysis cases per vaccine. That presumably outpaces wild
           | polio paralysis cases due to the non-existence of wild polio,
           | in certain regions. WHO evens says it's possible for others
           | to catch the paralysis from close contact with a recently-
           | vaccinated individual, though it's never spread beyond that.
           | 
           | https://www.who.int/immunization/diseases/poliomyelitis/endg.
           | ..
        
             | nsgi wrote:
             | cVDPV is the one that's the big problem. You can see how
             | many cases are occurring here:
             | 
             | http://polioeradication.org/polio-today/polio-now/this-
             | week/
        
             | makomk wrote:
             | There are two similar but crucially different problems with
             | the current live polio vaccine that both end in cases of
             | paralytic polio. Vaccine-associated paralytic polio is a
             | very rare complication where someone gets full-on paralytic
             | polio as a result of being vaccinated; it can also happen
             | to people who catch the vaccine virus from someone else
             | rather than from vaccination, but it's just as rare there.
             | Circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus is the one that's
             | really nasty for elimination efforts - once the vaccine
             | poliovirus circulates unchecked within a community for a
             | while, it mutates and basically turns back into full-on
             | real, unweakened polio in all its contagious paralytic
             | awfulness, at which point anyone who's exposed to it is at
             | much higher risk. As I understand it, cVDPV makes up the
             | large majority of both polio cases and paralytic polio
             | cases across the globe these days, and 100% of cases in
             | Africa now the wild-type virus has been eliminated from
             | there.
             | 
             | If VAPP was the only problem it could easily be fixed just
             | by eliminating polio and then ending the live vaccination
             | program. Unfortunately, that would make the cVDPV problem
             | worse because it's an actual, circulating virus that
             | primarily infects people who haven't been vaccinated, and
             | ending vaccination would increase the number of people at
             | risk from it. As the document from 2015 you've found
             | suggests, the folks trying to eliminate polio hoped that if
             | they phased out the live oral polio vaccine carefully and
             | in well-coordinated ways they could avoid major cVDPV
             | outbreaks afterwards. This doesn't seem to have worked out
             | as well as they hoped back then. In particular, this
             | article and HN discussion from a few months ago which
             | someone helpfully dug up is mostly about the failure of
             | this endgame plan in Africa:
             | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21920406
        
       | qwerty456127 wrote:
       | Again?
        
       | EGreg wrote:
       | I show stuff like this to anti vaxxers and ask if there have ever
       | been any vaccines they like.
       | 
       | They say that about cowpox and polio sanitation played a major
       | role, etc. And that we don't look at other variables.
        
       | hermitcrab wrote:
       | This is an amazing achievement and I salute everyone who worked
       | so hard to get this far.
       | 
       | My grandfather had polio and was lucky to survive. He spent quite
       | a bit of time in an iron lung. Apparently it changed his
       | personality significantly for the worse.
        
       | actuator wrote:
       | I know some people in tech don't like his Microsoft past but
       | considering the role of Melinda and Bill Gates foundation in this
       | and his continued funding for other such initiatives including
       | Covid-19 vaccines, I think if someone deserves a symbolic award
       | like Nobel Peace Prize(or whatever the equivalent would be in
       | this case) it would be both of them.
        
       | adaisadais wrote:
       | This is the sort of news the world needs today. Let's keep the
       | ball rolling. Keep making things happen, HN Community.
        
       | tombert wrote:
       | Finally, some really good news in 2020. This has brightened up my
       | exceedingly crappy week :).
       | 
       | I've read about polio a few times, and every time I do I feel
       | grateful to be born after they started vaccinating every child in
       | the United States. It's a terrible disease and it would be
       | amazing if it went the way of smallpox and (hopefully soon)
       | Dracunculiasis.
        
       | makomk wrote:
       | This is not the big, massive victory that the article makes it
       | sound like. The caveat "wild" is doing a lot of work that isn't
       | properly explained. What this means is that for the last several
       | years, all the cases of polio in Africa have been from
       | circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus - basically, a version of
       | the weakened virus used in the vaccine which has circulated for
       | long enough to reverse the mutations that weaken it. It spreads
       | like wild virus and paralyzes like wild virus, but technically
       | it's not wild-type virus. (As I understand it, the only practical
       | difference is that we can tell from genetic sequencing that it
       | came from the vaccine rather than being wild-type.) And this
       | can't be fixed by stopping the vaccination program - in fact,
       | that actually makes things worse, since it gives the deadly
       | vaccine-derived poliovirus more people who don't have immunity to
       | infect.
       | 
       | Some of the other news coverage like the Reuters article is a
       | little better at correctly pointing this caveat out:
       | https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-polio-africa/wild-p...
       | 
       | It's not even clear that it's poasible to actually eliminate
       | polio in developing countries with this vaccine or any existing
       | vaccines. The developed countries managed it but they had far
       | better infrastructure to roll out first the oral vaccine and then
       | the inactivated vaccine to everyone, and also far better
       | sanitation, and it's likely both of these things mattered -
       | under-vaccination makes this problem a lot worse, and whilst the
       | inactivsted vaccine protects people from polio there's some doubt
       | as to whether it can stop them spreading it via the oral-fecal
       | route due to poor immunity in the gut. The current hope seems to
       | be developing and deploying a new, better live vaccine which
       | cannot easily regain its original virulence.
        
         | yyyk wrote:
         | CVDPV still is weaker than "wild" polio - only about 1000 cases
         | ever (out of billions of vaccinations), and outbreaks are
         | controlled quickly (if slower than the original expectation).
         | Apparently both due to remaining mutations and since it's
         | nearly all polio type 2 - which was otherwise eradicated a long
         | time ago, apparently that type is a bit less "fit".
         | 
         | It's a problem, but one that can be managed by the existing
         | tools which brought polio down to this level - many countries
         | switched from trivalent OPV or removed OPV2 precisely to avoid
         | this scenario, and a new OPV2 vaccine will hopefully eliminate
         | the problem in the affected areas:
         | 
         | http://polioeradication.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/cVDPV...
        
         | vilhelm_s wrote:
         | Right. There was some previous discussion on Hacker News about
         | this under the headline "Polio eradication program faces hard
         | choices as endgame strategy falters"
         | [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21920406].
        
       | aazaa wrote:
       | The BBC article doesn't explain what "wild" means in detail. This
       | NPR article does:
       | 
       | > And there's another type of polio that's problematic. Sixteen
       | African nations are currently battling outbreaks of what's called
       | "vaccine-derived polio." This is a form of polio that stems from
       | the oral polio vaccine used in lower income countries because it
       | is cheap and easy to administer.
       | 
       | > The oral vaccine contains a live but weakened version of the
       | polio virus. The virus replicates inside the child's intestine
       | and eventually is excreted. In places with poor sanitation, fecal
       | matter can enter the drinking water supply and the virus is able
       | to start spreading from person to person.
       | 
       | https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/08/25/9058847...
        
         | mleonhard wrote:
         | A concise explanation of vaccine-derived polio:
         | 
         | https://www.who.int/westernpacific/news/q-a-detail/what-is-v...
        
       | george120 wrote:
       | Well good thing you started with that since you are clearly not
       | familiar with him at all. He is very very well read and highly
       | involved with the charity.
       | https://www.bloggerzune.com/2020/06/what-is-negative-seo.htm...
       | https://www.bloggerzune.com/2020/06/How-to-improve-your-blog...
       | https://www.bloggerzune.com/2020/06/whatsapp-web-scan.html?m...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-08-25 23:00 UTC)