[HN Gopher] Ancient Earth Globe
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Ancient Earth Globe
        
       Author : BerislavLopac
       Score  : 197 points
       Date   : 2020-09-13 10:56 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (dinosaurpictures.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (dinosaurpictures.org)
        
       | pvg wrote:
       | A Show HN with comments by the author:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17286770
        
       | martythemaniak wrote:
       | Super cool stuff. If the author has time, it would be even
       | possible to derive the major climate zones at that time using
       | large scale features like latitude, mountains, etc.
       | 
       | Here's a nice reconstruction of what Pangea looked like (200m
       | years ago) https://youtu.be/VKq0pr4rbRs
        
       | lhousa wrote:
       | Things escalated pretty quickly between first flowers and fist
       | primates
        
       | Hammershaft wrote:
       | Very impressive, what is a good resource for an interested layman
       | to learn more about earth science and deep time?
        
         | arethuza wrote:
         | I can strongly recommend _Earth: An Intimate History_ by
         | Richard Fortey.
         | 
         | Also
         | 
         |  _Land of Mountain and Flood: The Geology and Landforms of
         | Scotland_ - mind you that is obviously just about Scotland but
         | it is a gorgeous and fascinating book!
        
         | ajaalto wrote:
         | John McPhee: Annals of the former world, Simon Winchester: The
         | Map that Changed the World, Lutgens et al.: Essentials of
         | Geology
        
       | instakill wrote:
       | How can you make it stop spinning?
        
         | UncombedCoconut wrote:
         | Display Options, [ ] Rotate globe
        
         | jacobush wrote:
         | Some serious interplanetary engineering, likely involving
         | Fusion Candles on Jupiter to gather materials and fuel. Then a
         | constant bombardment of Earth from the right angle should stop
         | the spinning, eventually.
        
           | myself248 wrote:
           | I wonder if it could be done with nothing more than "solar
           | sails" at ground level, aimed so they reflect the sunrise and
           | push back against rotation, but exert no directional force
           | the rest of the day.
        
       | dmos62 wrote:
       | Grass appeared 35 million years ago? At the same time as the
       | first primates? And flowers 120 million years ago? After
       | dinosaurs appeared (220 million years ago)? My mind is blown.
       | What did landscapes look like?
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | rosstex wrote:
         | According to science television, lots of palm trees.
        
         | billiam wrote:
         | What's really amazing is to think that it was only after
         | grasses started taking over that very large land mammals could
         | evolve on the vast marshy plains of North America and over 5
         | million years or so as sea levels rose due climate change
         | become whales and other cetaceans. I wonder if humans will do
         | the same, albeit in much less nutritious oceans that we are
         | busily acidifying.
        
           | chansiky wrote:
           | That's an interesting thought. I was running last week along
           | the beach and was thinking about how early primates/hominids
           | might have decided what plants could be eaten and what plants
           | should be avoided when I saw a stalk of grass with its
           | seeds/flowers. It seemed clear to me just looking at it that
           | the seeds might be extremely edible, and I wouldn't be
           | surprised if many other hungry hominids(and other herbivores)
           | came to same conclusion. What I didn't know was how recent
           | the first grass was nor did I realize how important it might
           | have been for the evolution of land mammals. Here's an
           | interesting fact about grass I just learned (from
           | Wikipedia[1][2]):
           | 
           | > They provide, through direct human consumption, just over
           | one-half (51%) of all dietary energy;
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poaceae [2]
           | http://www.fao.org/rice2004/en/f-sheet/factsheet3.pdf
        
           | simonh wrote:
           | We don't need to evolve much in the way of new adaptations
           | anymore, we have technology. That's how come we can colonise
           | environments from the frozen tundra, to tropical jungles, to
           | the harshest deserts, and now even the vacuum of space.
        
             | nurettin wrote:
             | Humans didn't need much technology to live in deserts and
             | tundras. But what if they run out of earth metals to cycle?
             | What if they can't build sustainable energy sources? Our
             | top modern "tech" lasts a couple of hundreds of years
             | before totally collapsing. Humans will eventually go back
             | to simpler tools, be it 10 million years or 100. I give it
             | a couple of hundred thousand.
        
               | simonh wrote:
               | We've essentially built the entire modern world in a bit
               | over a century. The only way we'll run out of metals to
               | recycle is if we shoot it all out into space. Otherwise
               | it'll still be here in one form or another. I am
               | concerned about the long term sustainability of our
               | current phase of civilisation. I think our current way of
               | life is largely doomed, but we will develop new ways of
               | life.
               | 
               | Tens of millions of years is a long time. Who knows?
        
         | mjklin wrote:
         | From Wells and Huxley's _The Science of Life_ (1929):
         | 
         | It is difficult to imagine this world with all its land
         | surfaces lifeless; yet for more than a half of its history Life
         | played out its drama under water, and the continents were
         | practically barren. They were stark and bare, starker and barer
         | than the utmost desert of today. Over the bare cliffs and
         | desolate plains the sole breath of movement came from the wind
         | and rain. A certain margin there may have been of faintly
         | vitalized soil. From comparatively early times, a few simple
         | algae may have trailed their filaments over the seashore or the
         | moist borders of rock pools, or a few bacteria invaded the
         | crumbling earth surface...
         | 
         | The face of the land was like nothing we know today. There
         | could have been no real soil, for soil is largely a product of
         | plant action. There was no carpet of plants and felt-work of
         | roots to hold water like a sponge, preventing rapid run-off,
         | and to blanket the ground from excessive gain and loss of heat;
         | and so the work of frost and wind, rain and sun, was much more
         | active. The heights of the land were worn down quicker and
         | sediments more actively deposited, and the scenery was more
         | angular and forbidding. Even long after the first appearance of
         | land-plants vast regions of the land which would now be covered
         | with vegetation remained desert or semi-desert, since all the
         | earliest plants demanded a good deal of moisture.
         | 
         | Plants like grasses, which can thrive on dry steppes and
         | prairies, are comparatively modern things. The Paleozoic Era
         | knew nothing of them and the Mesozoic comparatively little.
         | There was a desert flora and fauna in the Triassic; but
         | possibly at least, the regions it inhabited would today be
         | steppes or savannahs.
         | 
         | It is a good exercise of the scientific imagination to picture
         | this desolate and desert earth, its continents cyclically
         | rising out of the waters and submerging themselves again,
         | occasionally undergoing a spasm of mountain-building or an ice
         | age, but remaining essentially lifeless for well over five
         | hundred of our million-year periods, in spite of the abundant
         | presence and notable progress of life in the waters. Through
         | all these ages, the lands remained unconquered and must have
         | seemed unconquerable.
        
         | glial wrote:
         | Lots of ferns maybe?
        
       | fauigerzigerk wrote:
       | Amazing! I wish it didn't end in the present.
        
       | zcdziura wrote:
       | Sort of off-topic: I love looking at images of how the Earth's
       | continents have shifted and moved over time. They provide a lot
       | of inspiration for me when making homemade maps for my D&D games.
       | Whatever nature has done makes for much more compelling and
       | believable maps than what I can make on my own!
       | 
       | My latest map is based on a rotated view of what Pangaea Proxima
       | will (probably) look like in a few million years. Looks pretty
       | neat and provides a lot of inspiration.
        
         | johnchristopher wrote:
         | Aren't generators really good now ? I was under the impression
         | they really did improve over the last years.
        
       | mkl wrote:
       | That whole site is pretty neat. So many dinosaurs!
        
       | based2 wrote:
       | http://www.scotese.com/
       | 
       | https://vimeo.com/315907106
       | DeepTimeMaps_Animation_Mollweide_Sample
        
       | jagger27 wrote:
       | Brilliant to see where some land masses stay relatively intact
       | and how little they've changed. Newfoundland and Labrador in
       | today's Eastern Canada stand out to me. I really want to those
       | weathered ancient mountains some day.
        
         | tremon wrote:
         | What amazed me most is the relative short (recent) period in
         | which the Himalayas formed. India split from Madagascar
         | relavively recently, the speed with which it collided with asia
         | must have been huge.
        
       | tvalentius wrote:
       | One of my favourite earth's 3D visualisation
        
       | Aardwolf wrote:
       | This is so awesome, I just wish it could go back even further to
       | 1 billion, 2 billion, ... years ago! If we know enough about the
       | Earth's history and tectonics to depict it...
        
       | Rajdeep100 wrote:
       | Cool
        
       | Rajdeep100 wrote:
       | pretty awesome
        
       | tekcyb-org wrote:
       | I don't understand how land masses the size of africa detaches.
       | The map shows africa attached to the US, but this doesn't make
       | sense. I can understand water levels changing, exposing new areas
       | that might have been underwater, drying up and turning into land
       | masses, as well as areas that were previously land, becoming
       | filled with water.
        
         | danielbln wrote:
         | All continents rest on tectonic plates, which kind of rest on
         | the liquid core and are moving around on it. Let enough time
         | pass, and the plates will move around, and the continents with
         | them.
         | 
         | Check out this image of the plates:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics#/media/File:Pl...
        
         | Rexxar wrote:
         | It's tectonic plates
         | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics).
         | 
         | You can currently see continent splitting in Island and in
         | Africa : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_African_Rift
        
         | phkahler wrote:
         | To understand the separation of the Americas from African you
         | may want to read about the mid ocean ridge:
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-ocean_ridge
         | 
         | Now how that large land mass came to be is an interesting
         | question to me. The globe shown here in the title/link is
         | clearly not homogeneous. The land mass on one side must be less
         | dense than the rest of the earth for it to protrude above sea
         | level that way.
        
           | spionnaidh wrote:
           | The continents are indeed less dense than the oceans!
           | 
           | On average, the continental crust has a composition that is
           | also seen in magmas that are produced at subduction zones
           | (where denser oceanic crust is forced under continental
           | crust) by the melting of the mantle. At the mid-ocean ridges,
           | water is circulated through the newly produced oceanic crust,
           | and the fresh basalt is metamorphosed, causing new minerals
           | to grow which contain water as a part of their structure. Up
           | to a few hundred million years later, this oceanic crust
           | reaches a subduction zone, where it is pulled into the
           | mantle. As it sinks, it is exposed to higher pressures and
           | the water-bearing minerals become unstable. The water within
           | them is driven off the crust and rises into the overlying
           | mantle. At these pressures and temperatures, water is to rock
           | what salt is to ice, and part of the mantle melts - think of
           | it as a kind of 'slush'. As the magma (the liquid part of
           | this slush) rises to the surface, it begins to crystallise,
           | and the denser crystals (which form first) sink. Overall,
           | this makes the magma less dense, continuing to drive it to
           | the surface, where it may either eventually stall in the
           | crust (in a pluton) or be erupted in a volcano. Now there is
           | less dense material sitting on top of and within the oceanic
           | crust and an island arc is born - an example today is the
           | Aleutian Islands.
           | 
           | The magmas formed at subduction zones have a distinctive
           | geochemical signature called the 'calc-alkaline' trend.
           | Whereas magmas at mid-ocean ridges become enriched in iron
           | because of the crystallisation of plagioclase feldspar, at
           | subduction zones the presence of water suppresses feldspar
           | crystallisation, instead producing 'wet' minerals like
           | amphibole. As a result, these magmas do not become enriched
           | in iron as they rise through the crust, and instead become
           | rich in sodium and potassium. These magmas also have
           | distinctive radiogenic isotope ratios and trace element
           | contents. The continental crust (while highly compositionally
           | varied) on average has similar signatures, suggesting that it
           | was formed by this kind of activity.
           | 
           | The fun happens when two of these island arcs collide. They
           | are both less dense than the underlying mantle, so neither
           | will subduct easily. Instead, they coalesce into a single
           | mass, and a continent is born. More common today is the
           | collision of an island arc with a pre-existing continent.
           | This happened before India collided with Asia to form the
           | Himalayas, and the calc-alkaline plutonic rocks are visible
           | at the surface in Tibet today. This is how the continents
           | grow.
           | 
           | The continents are thought to have started to form during the
           | Archaen Eon, starting at four billion years ago. The rate at
           | which they formed is still very much up for debate, but it is
           | thought that crustal growth was more rapid back then as
           | compared to today, and was mostly complete by around 2.5
           | billion years ago. Today's tectonic plates are cored by
           | ancient cratons, the oldest and most tectonically stable
           | pieces of crust. Around these cratons are progressively
           | younger strips of crust stuck on by colliding island arcs.
           | Much of North America is made up of island arcs stuck to the
           | Laurentian craton.
        
         | Waterluvian wrote:
         | It's a fantastic question this stuff isn't intuitive.
         | 
         | http://mapdesign.icaci.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/atlant...
         | 
         | Consider this model: the Earth is like a puzzle. Its crust is
         | made up of a bunch of pieces that all fit together. But those
         | pieces aren't unchanging. They all sit on top of a huge soft
         | sludgey core called the mantle. And they want to slowly
         | (slooooooowly) slide around.
         | 
         | At each boundary between pieces one of three things can happen:
         | 
         | - they slide against each other
         | 
         | - they diverge from each other
         | 
         | - they press into each other, often one going under the other,
         | sometimes one pushing the other.
         | 
         | A continent can move, oh so slowly, over millions of years
         | through a combination of shifting along with other plates, or
         | having one side of its plate grow (move away and have the new
         | gap filled with the molten plasticy goo underneath), while the
         | other side pushes away a plate or disappears underneath the
         | other plate.
         | 
         | The map I linked shows a massive stretch mark of the Earth in
         | the Atlantic Ocean. This is one striking piece of evidence that
         | the above effects have been happening over a long long time.
         | It's basically the boundary between a few plates. And it shows
         | all this brand new ocean floor that came flowing up from under
         | the crust (then cooled and got hard) when a gap was created
         | because they separated apart.
        
           | tekcyb-org wrote:
           | Wow thank you for the explanation and that picture you
           | provided makes it very clear as well. I did not realize that
           | the world was divided into plates.
        
             | tremon wrote:
             | There's a BBC documentary on this that's now around 25
             | years old, called Earth Story
             | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Story). It describes
             | not only what we know, but how we know it. As documentaries
             | go, it's rather in-depth but easily digestible.
        
           | EdwardDiego wrote:
           | Looking at New Zealand 35 million and 20 million years ago on
           | that globe (search for one of our cities like Auckland or
           | Christchurch) is really illuminating when compared to its
           | current shape, most of the South Island is to the west of the
           | North Island, as the plate boundary between the Indian and
           | Pacific plate runs through the South Island, and the eastern
           | side has been moving south-west for millennia to form the
           | current shape of the land, and our Southern Alps.
        
           | laumars wrote:
           | Good explanation.
           | 
           | To expand on that, earthquakes and volcanoes are the result
           | of those plates colliding and separating.
        
       | hooo wrote:
       | Good seeing Ian's work here!
       | 
       | http://www.ianww.com/
        
       | zamadatix wrote:
       | I could instantly recognize the map as work of Christopher R.
       | Scotese. Has there been other work to create paleo maps or was
       | this work from 2000 and prior so definitive nobody has felt the
       | need?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-09-13 23:00 UTC)