[HN Gopher] Robert Gore has died
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Robert Gore has died
        
       Author : leephillips
       Score  : 162 points
       Date   : 2020-09-20 14:58 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
        
       | revx wrote:
       | The more I hear about Gore-Tex, (and PTFE and PFOA, the chemicals
       | Gore-tex and other Teflon stuff is created from) the more I think
       | this is one of those chemicals that we'll look back on in 50
       | years like we now look at leaded gasoline.
       | 
       | Besides being known as deadly to parrots, I think studies
       | (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28913736/) are starting to
       | reveal that there are risks with PTFE and PFOA that need more
       | research.
       | 
       | I try not to be alarmist about chemicals and am generally in
       | favor of scientific progress, but this chemical (similarly to
       | PCBs) seems like one of those "wonder materials" that's great for
       | specific applications that turns out to be terrible for life and
       | the environment as soon as people sit down and actually look at
       | the effects over a long period of time.
        
         | andrewem wrote:
         | See for example the small town of Hoosick Falls, New York where
         | PFOA poisoned the water supply.
         | 
         | Many sources, but here's one https://pfasproject.com/hoosick-
         | falls-new-york/
        
           | hobofan wrote:
           | Also in Parkersburg, where the resulting long legal battle
           | was portrayed in the movie Dark Waters last year. Another
           | great addition to the genre of "Mark Ruffalo investigative
           | thrillers".
        
         | refurb wrote:
         | PFOA I can understand, but PTFE?
         | 
         | Sure, it's toxic to parrots, if you burn the material and it
         | decomposes. But how many materials aren't? Most plastic will
         | produce highly toxic products when burned.
         | 
         | PTFE is produced from tetra-fluoroethylene, which is a gas,
         | doesn't get into water supplies.
         | 
         | And PTFE is very non-toxic. That's why we use it in medical
         | implants.
        
           | jjoonathan wrote:
           | Yeah, but they don't buy commercials with happy bongo music
           | and stir FUD about their competition, so how good can it be?
        
         | hansvs wrote:
         | Well that just messed with my head. For some reason
         | (advertising? confusion? stupidity?) I had thought that Gore-
         | Tex was based on a special weaving technique and use of special
         | acrylic fibres... Wikipedia says `It is composed of stretched
         | polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), which is more commonly known by
         | the generic trademark Teflon.`
         | 
         | Damn....
        
           | specialist wrote:
           | Ya, I felt _truly stupid_ once I realized Gore-Tex is Teflon.
           | REI is gonna need a makeover once this catches on.
           | 
           | Since learning about micro plastics from fabrics polluting
           | our waterways, I'm keen to find alternatives.
           | 
           | I had an Australian style rain coat (dense weave, regularly
           | reapply wax) as a kid. I couldn't find anything comparable
           | locally.
           | 
           | Meanwhile, I got one of those fisherman jackets. I sweat so
           | much, the only benefit I get is wind protection.
        
             | cnasc wrote:
             | > (dense weave, regularly reapply wax)
             | 
             | Barbour?
        
               | Bayart wrote:
               | Or Belstaff. Even Aigle makes pretty good waxed jackets
               | on occasion.
               | 
               | But one of the best materials for rain is still... wool.
        
               | tokamak-teapot wrote:
               | I have had several wool coats and none of them have been
               | at all rain repellent. I've also worn many pure wool
               | jumpers and hats in the rain, again none of them holding
               | off anything more than the lightest drizzle.
               | 
               | What sort of wool is good for keeping off the rain?
               | 
               | Edit: Wearing (only) a damp wool jumper is fine if you're
               | up a mountain and it's not too windy or freezing cold,
               | but I'd still prefer to be dry!
        
               | mod wrote:
               | Not the GP, so not sure what he was specifically talking
               | about, but wool is known for retaining its insulative
               | value even when wet.
               | 
               | Yes, you're wet, but you're still warm.
               | 
               | Many outdoorsmen prefer this to the uncertainty of being
               | able to keep their gear dry.
        
               | Bayart wrote:
               | Yes, that's what I'm talking about. By thick rainy
               | weather I love nothing more than a coarse knitted woolen
               | sweater and a heavy tweed jacket. It's warm, breathable
               | and I'll never stay so long under the rain that it's
               | soaked.
               | 
               | As far as strictly waterproofing goes, you do need
               | coating or some hybrid material with PU weaved in. IMO
               | it's more useful as a wind barrier than anything else.
        
               | Thlom wrote:
               | This is why you always use layers with wool closest to
               | the skin.
        
             | dheera wrote:
             | Is there any reason why aerogel (e.g. PyroGel) hasn't
             | caught on as an insulation for winter jackets? The demos
             | look pretty impressive:
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1Ig8rW80uk
        
               | matsur wrote:
               | The first jackets using Aerogel as insulation are just
               | hitting the market.
               | https://www.patagonia.com/product/mens-das-
               | parka/85350.html?... is one example. The previous version
               | of this jacket is a cult favorite; curious to see what
               | reviews of the new Aerogel version look like.
        
               | conk wrote:
               | Without special treatment aerogel would be damaged by
               | movement and moisture that is common with a jacket. It's
               | also very costly to produces compared to other insulating
               | materials.
        
               | Haemm0r wrote:
               | As far as i remember, people wearing clothes with this
               | type of insualtion had problems with overheating.
               | 
               | However things may have changed since then
               | 
               | https://www.outsideonline.com/1919251/forget-down--
               | aerogel-in...
        
               | dheera wrote:
               | Interesting. I was wondering since I've felt cold in
               | almost every Gore-tex jacket I have worn. Also it would
               | seem to me that using a really thin layer of the aerogel
               | stuff could prevent overheating, keep warm while being
               | stupidly thin and impressive.
        
               | et-al wrote:
               | Gore-Tex is not meant to insulate unless you're talking
               | about just the bare skin feel against the inside of the
               | jacket. Some Gore-Tex jackets had a mesh liner which
               | helps alleviate that cold surface feeling (and protect
               | the teflon layer).
               | 
               | If you're interested in insulation for high-exertion
               | activities, Polartec Alpha is now the bee's knees.
        
             | unwind wrote:
             | Look for Swedish outdoor brand Fjallraven, their G1000
             | material is waxed cotton. Not the cheapest but they are
             | high quality and wil last.
        
               | michaf wrote:
               | I have a couple of pants made from G-1000, and I really
               | like it's properties (light, durable, will not retain
               | much water, can be made water-repellent with wax), but it
               | actually is made from 65% polyester and 35% cotton [1].
               | 
               | [1] https://www.fjallraven.com/uk/en-gb/about-
               | fjallraven/materia...
        
             | parsimo2010 wrote:
             | They have a few different versions now, but the key to the
             | membrane is that it's really thin. It's not like most
             | average Joes can make their own even if they buy a bunch of
             | PTFE pellets. It's also overkill for most people and daily
             | life, but Gore Tex (or some of the newer competitors) is
             | worth it when backpacking or biking; you don't want to
             | carry the weight of a waxed canvas jacket for a long trip.
        
             | nextos wrote:
             | British invented a tightly woven cotton called Ventile for
             | RAF pilots, which is waterproof, windproof and breathes
             | quite well when not wet.
             | 
             | It has some disadvantages, but it's natural, it doesn't
             | burn and it doesn't make funny noises. There are even some
             | certified organic variants made in Switzerland by Stotz.
             | Many manufacturers in Germany, Scandinavia and UK are
             | adding this to some of their jackets, so it's worth looking
             | around.
             | 
             | Else, Paramo has developed a clever cloth called Analogy,
             | which works in a manner similar to animal fur to push rain
             | out and keep you warm. It's not perfect either, and it's
             | based on synthetic fibers, but it doesn't have nasty
             | plastic coatings. It's used by some mountain guides in my
             | region, and when I asked they were quite satisfied.
        
               | m0zg wrote:
               | > RAF pilots
               | 
               | AKA people not exposed to the elements most of the time.
        
               | et-al wrote:
               | Ventile, long staple cotton, works by absorbing and
               | swelling with water; "closing" the weave and preventing
               | further water from getting in. However, the inner surface
               | of the fabric is still wet, so your clothes underneath
               | the jacket can still get wet through capillary action. So
               | to mitigate this, oftentimes manufacturers will use two
               | layers of Ventile or put a wool liner underneath the
               | shoulders.
               | 
               | Also, once thoroughly soaked through, it will take just
               | as long to dry as regular ol' cotton. This is why Stotz
               | still treats their version, EtaProof, with DWR.
               | 
               | I think Ventile is great, but I think it's better suited
               | for situations where you'll return to a heated shelter at
               | the end of the night.
        
             | hvs wrote:
             | Waxed canvas is used a lot for woodworking aprons. I'd look
             | for a waxed canvas rain coat.
        
               | jowiar wrote:
               | Barbour is probably the most well-known waxed canvas
               | jacket. They're great, especially in areas where rain
               | comes suddenly.
        
             | bparsons wrote:
             | Try the North face Thermoball line of jackets. I put mine
             | through all manner of environmental abuse this year and it
             | performed extremely well.
             | 
             | The materials all seem pretty boring sounding.
        
             | marcyb5st wrote:
             | I think there are already alternatives. Dyneema fiber is
             | superior to GoreTex in almost any way but price (I have
             | ultralight backpacks made of the stuff and are amazing).
             | Moreover, they are more resistant to UV light than other
             | polymers, lowering the chance they end up as microplastics.
             | 
             | If, instead, you are looking for waxable gear, have a look
             | at Fjallraven G-1000 series of products. They cost a penny,
             | but they are ultra sturdy and, in general, top-notch
             | outdoor gear. Moreover Fjallraven should be one of the more
             | environmental friendly brands for technical gear ATM.
        
         | paulcole wrote:
         | If you could snap your fingers and erase the environmental
         | impact Goretex has had on the world, it would be the
         | environmental equivalent of squishing a single ant. Yes, you
         | did _something_ but that something was ultimately pointless on
         | a global scale.
         | 
         | If you're not an alarmist, don't wring your hands over Goretex.
         | It is _nothing_ like leaded gasoline.
         | 
         | The modern world is the blight on the environment. We just like
         | it too much to ever change. We'd rather think Goretex or not
         | separating glass from plastic or using/not using canvas
         | shopping bags (depending on how contrarian you're feeling) is
         | the culprit. But really it's us and how we like to live.
         | 
         | We should enjoy this ride while it lasts.
        
         | bbarn wrote:
         | Everything will kill you, in sufficient quantities. The
         | question is whether its use outweighs the risks, and I'd
         | venture to say PTFE if called upon to settle accounts has done
         | the world more good than harm.
        
           | comicjk wrote:
           | That's likely true now, but we have a problem if the harm
           | (pollution) accumulates each year and doesn't go away.
           | Eventually it may exceed the good.
        
       | nateburke wrote:
       | RIP.
       | 
       | Next to "Intel Inside", I can't think of a more successful
       | secondary brand in the consumer goods world.
        
       | dirtyid wrote:
       | TIL gortex generics is just teflon. Always avoided gortex
       | products because they seem to insist on very visible branding,
       | but guess I've owned gortex products all my life.
        
         | kag0 wrote:
         | The very visible branding is because a) they work very closely
         | with the products that get to use goretex, and they guarantee
         | those products. So if I buy a Marmot rain jacket with goretex
         | and I have a problem with it, I can go to goretex and they'll
         | replace it. That's a pretty strong guarantee that consumers
         | want to see very visibly. and b) they market hard to convince
         | consumers that if it's not goretex, it won't be breathable. A
         | bunch of competitors (outdry, event, neoshell, etc) popped up a
         | few years ago and lots of companies switched to them from
         | goretex, but goretex has since reeled them back in and now we
         | see most companies using only goretex again.
        
       | jkestner wrote:
       | The most notable thing about WL Gore is that they have a flat
       | management structure. Everyone's title is 'associate' in a way
       | that'd be laughable at Walmart, they rank each other to
       | distribute compensation, and they own the company.
       | 
       | https://www.managementexchange.com/story/innovation-democrac...
       | https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1984/04/30/g...
        
       | IgorPartola wrote:
       | If you want to see Gore-Tex in action, this is a fantastic demo:
       | https://youtu.be/dtCdQfbLw7o. Their other videos are very
       | entertaining also.
        
         | afterburner wrote:
         | Hmm. His rig stretches the fabrics he's testing, when they're
         | not meant to be stretched aggressively like that in normal use.
        
           | chrisseaton wrote:
           | But that's what he's testing - what happens when you sit on a
           | wet seat or kneel on wet ground or have your feet pushed into
           | wet boots. That's what you need GoreTex for. It's a stress
           | test. They're already trivially waterproof when just sitting
           | there that's obvious so no need to test it.
        
             | afterburner wrote:
             | But the rig he made was meant to simulate the actual test
             | of having a long thin tube of water sitting over a tiny
             | section of the fabric. It introduces a lot more widespread
             | stretching than the real test would, inflating the fabric
             | like a balloon (not just simply applying pressure). I bet
             | this affects the water resistance of the fabrics quite a
             | lot, beyond what you'd normally apply to it. Do you stretch
             | your knee fabric like a balloon when you apply pressure
             | onto it to the ground?
             | 
             | Did appreciate the breathability test though.
        
               | chrisseaton wrote:
               | > Do you stretch your knee fabric like a balloon when you
               | apply pressure onto it to the ground?
               | 
               | When you kneel? Yeah it can be subject to a lot of stress
               | as it's drawn taught over your knee. And if you had a
               | heavy pack on it could be taking 150 kg.
               | 
               | If all you do in your Gore-Tex is stand still in the rain
               | it's probably not a valid test - if you're using it for
               | outdoors work then it is.
        
           | secondcoming wrote:
           | Yes, clearly an invalid test but interesting nonetheless
        
         | puranjay wrote:
         | Relevant Seinfeld clip as well:
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/0e58SiFSxLs
        
         | CarVac wrote:
         | I'm upset that there was no scatter plot between vapor
         | permeability and water resistance.
        
         | bsimpson wrote:
         | FortNine is the gold standard of review videos.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | animationwill wrote:
       | >> Among its varied applications, Gore-Tex is used in medical
       | devices including heart patches, guitar strings, space suits, and
       | vacuum bags.
       | 
       | I have always considered GoreTex to be one of those simple-but-
       | brilliant inventions. Tiny pores to prevent water droplets, but
       | still breathable, but I had no idea it was also used in medical
       | devices or space!
        
       | [deleted]
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | drno123 wrote:
       | Robert Gore was not the first to discover ePTFE (Gore Tex)
       | material, but the prior inventor kept his invention as a trade
       | secret. Robert Gore has defended his patent against original
       | inventor, won, and then sued anyone who has uses equipment made
       | by the original inventor.
        
         | matkoniecz wrote:
         | Nice to see patent system working as intended.
        
         | cma wrote:
         | How was that possible since that was before first-to-file?
        
           | wtallis wrote:
           | The Wikipedia article for Gore-Tex has two citations about
           | this, one of which is available online: https://law.resource.
           | org/pub/us/case/reporter/F2/721/721.F2d...
           | 
           | A key paragraph from that ruling:
           | 
           | > _Early public disclosure is a linchpin of the patent
           | system. As between a prior inventor who benefits from a
           | process by selling its product but suppresses, conceals, or
           | otherwise keeps the process from the public, and a later
           | inventor who promptly files a patent application from which
           | the public will gain a disclosure of the process, the law
           | favors the latter. See Horwath v. Lee, 564 F.2d 948, 195 USPQ
           | 701 (CCPA 1977). The district court therefore erred as a
           | matter of law in applying the statute and in its
           | determination that Budd 's secret use of the Cropper machine
           | and sale of tape rendered all process claims of the '566
           | patent invalid under Sec. 102(b)._
           | 
           | It looks like there's an important distinction between
           | patenting Gore-Tex the product, and patenting a process for
           | manufacturing Gore-Tex.
        
       | racl101 wrote:
       | It's Goh-tex!
        
       | davidbanham wrote:
       | I heavily favour goretex gear even when the item doesn't really
       | need to be waterproof. More than the membrane, I respect gear
       | with the goretex label because of the durability standards they
       | enforce on manufacturers using their product. I know that this
       | piece has been independently tested and it will last me well for
       | years before needing replacement.
        
       | projektfu wrote:
       | Dang, why drop the identifier "Gore-Tex?" Who cares about some
       | guy they can't identify except through their work?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-09-20 23:00 UTC)