[HN Gopher] Mobilizon - A free, federated tool for events and gr...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Mobilizon - A free, federated tool for events and groups
        
       Author : staz
       Score  : 424 points
       Date   : 2020-10-27 11:05 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (framablog.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (framablog.org)
        
       | Spearchucker wrote:
       | Wow that's pretty ambitious, and pretty relevant for me right
       | now. I build models, and so used to frequent forums to post to
       | build threads detailing what I'd done with photos, sometimes a
       | Word doc, video, and always some plain text.
       | 
       | Problem with the forums is that they're dated. It's easy enough
       | to find old content because search is usually pretty ok. Who owns
       | content is still not a solved thing though. A forum in Germany
       | insists you upload your IP to their servers so that your photos
       | don't disappear over time. Other forums let me host my hosts on
       | my own web site with a link.
       | 
       | Facebook of course is godawful. Everybody is there, so everybody
       | posts there. Unforunately you cannot find old stuff you know is
       | there. Photos aren't annotated, comments aren't searcheable,
       | stuff just disappears into a rabbit hole. Here today, gone
       | tomorrow. Facebook's content is ephemeral, so it's groups are the
       | worst possible forum replacement.
       | 
       | And from what I can tell (I can't start my own group to assess
       | features) Mobilizon doesn't add anything to improve on what
       | Facebook already does.
       | 
       | What's needed is an organic heirarchical taxonomy where you're
       | persented with a top-level list of options. Say for instance
       | manufacturers. You pick one, and are given a list of models. Pick
       | one of those and you see all models in the repository for that
       | make/model. Lastly (in my contrived example) you might choose
       | your favourite model maker to further narrow that list, or a
       | date, country or whatever.
       | 
       | This is not hard to build (modellers are pretty hardcore about
       | what they build, and so would not hesitate to add the meta data
       | needed to drive this), and I've been toying with a usable UI for
       | it for some time. Maybe I should post up a proof of concept
       | somewhere...
        
         | jtbayly wrote:
         | This use case seems orthogonal at best to the idea of
         | Mobilizon.
        
           | glenstein wrote:
           | Yeah, I had the same reaction. Was that parent comment posted
           | in the right thread? Mobilizon is about events and that
           | comment seems to have nothing to do with the link.
        
           | Spearchucker wrote:
           | Arguably. Forums have been supplanted by Facebook groups.
           | Mobilizon seeks to do the same to Facebook. I can't create a
           | group so I cannot definitively say anything about it. You may
           | very well be right.
        
             | jtbayly wrote:
             | I haven't read much, but it seemed to me to be about
             | events, much more than groups.
        
             | glenstein wrote:
             | Mobilizon is intended to put events on the activitypub
             | protocol. In that sense, it's a replacement for a slice of
             | Facebook. I wouldn't say it's a replacement for all of
             | Facebook.
        
         | williamtwild wrote:
         | Why not just start a blog?
        
           | Spearchucker wrote:
           | Because it's unweidly. Too verbose. A post is often no more
           | than a sentence or less with a photo.Each comment on an entry
           | would have to be another blog post with it's own
           | attached/linked media. Also tag clouds lack structure. It's
           | difficult to search across blogs (which would delinieate
           | users). You could shoehorn it in, but the blog solution is
           | nothing close to ideal.
        
             | wizzwizz4 wrote:
             | https://write.as/ makes blogs a little easier, and the
             | IndieWeb easier still, but it's not quite good enough yet.
        
         | aaronax wrote:
         | Just yesterday I was thinking about some sort of social network
         | where every piece of content is required to link to at least
         | one Wikidata item, OpenStreetMap node, etc. With the right
         | tooling this would get you the "organic hierarchical taxonomy".
         | 
         | I thought it would be an interesting way to make sure the
         | conversations are actually ABOUT something. And it would
         | hopefully encourage contributions to those sorts of open data
         | projects.
        
       | Deukhoofd wrote:
       | I really enjoy what Framasoft is trying to do, making the
       | internet decentralized again. I truly hope they're successful in
       | their endeavours!
        
         | glenstein wrote:
         | Strongly agree! I love everything framasoft is doing. It's mana
         | for the internet.
         | 
         | It's also a great way to create a sense of perspective for how
         | pro-social (or not) the frightful five are. You would never see
         | Microsoft, or Apple, or Google etc bother to support open
         | protocols or work to flush them out so that events, photos,
         | tweeting, and all the major social activities are put on a
         | foundation of open and interoperable protocols that anyone can
         | use. They certainly could have moved in that direction if they
         | wanted to, but they just haven't wanted to. And while I
         | appreciate for framasoft for what they're doing at face value,
         | on an entirely different level I appreciate the contrast
         | between their projects and the projects of the F5.
        
       | kaushikt wrote:
       | Meetup has done a standup job with events. I would love to see
       | them do more with groups too. It's annoying to join the meetup
       | "group" and then join their adjacent Slack or Telegram group.
        
         | mxuribe wrote:
         | Even though i've never been a fan of centralized services, i
         | never hated meetup.com that much...Or, rather, i never hated
         | the concept of what meetup.com represents (or could represent).
         | But over the years, i really have always disliked the overall
         | experience. And as years pass by, i seem to dislike the
         | meetup.com experience more and more.
        
       | Wowfunhappy wrote:
       | Some of these illustrations are really great! I'd probably use
       | them as desktop wallpapers if I could get higher resolution
       | versions.
        
         | Pouhiou wrote:
         | The sources (krita files) and hi res jpeg files will soon be
         | published online here
         | https://www.peppercarrot.com/en/static6/sources&page=other
         | 
         | All those illustrations are CC-By David Revoy :
         | https://www.davidrevoy.com/article800/mobilizon
        
           | Wowfunhappy wrote:
           | Whoa, lots of excellent artwork! Thank you!
        
         | m12k wrote:
         | The floating islands one made me want to go re-play Bastion
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | You can use Waifu2x to upscale artwork:
         | 
         | Online demo: http://waifu2x.udp.jp/
         | 
         | Repo: https://github.com/nagadomi/waifu2x
         | 
         | Reddit discussion:
         | https://www.reddit.com/r/VRchat/comments/bkw543/tutorial_how...
        
         | jorams wrote:
         | The full versions of these illustrations have high resolutions:
         | 
         | https://framablog.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-10-06-...
         | 
         | https://framablog.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-10-08-...
         | 
         | https://framablog.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-10-06-...
         | 
         | https://framablog.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-10-06-...
         | 
         | https://framablog.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-10-06-...
         | 
         | (Not sure if these are linked anywhere, but I just chopped the
         | image size out of the URL.)
        
         | sk2020 wrote:
         | They also seem to be very similar to Mastodon. They may be
         | inspired from that.
        
           | Seirdy wrote:
           | Mobilizon appears to be a Fediverse server just like
           | Mastodon, Pleroma, and others.
        
       | zimpenfish wrote:
       | Got an install up and running on Arch but it required a fair
       | amount of divergence from the installation instructions. (I'll
       | try and whip up a list of what was different later.)
        
       | skratlo wrote:
       | It's great to see alternatives popping up everywhere, keep it
       | coming
        
       | meetups323 wrote:
       | I'm about 2 hours into setting up an Mobilizon instance for
       | outdoor socially distant activities, but running into problems
       | [1] and at the end of the day federation isn't important to me
       | and I'd prefer the learning opportunity and flexibility of
       | building my own [2].
       | 
       | Curious if any HNers in the PNW region might use such a service
       | to pod up for outdoor socially distant activities (hiking,
       | wilderness cleanup, kayaking, perhaps camping/backpacking/biking,
       | etc). I moved here just pre-COVID, and quarantine, my introverted
       | nature, lack of FB, and tendency to enjoy things that don't
       | involve lots of people being around has left me without as much
       | of a do-things-with group as I might like.
       | 
       | [1] I'm 2+ hours into provisioning/setup, and unfortunately the
       | yarn install keeps hanging/crashing on the $5 digital ocean
       | droplet I provisioned for this, and at the end of the day I'd
       | prefer to have full knowledge and control over the stack.
       | Additionally, for me federation isn't important, all I want is an
       | open architecture that respects privacy.
       | 
       | [2] To keep things simple for myself and users, it wouldn't be
       | federated, instead there would be a single domain I manage that
       | hosts the events. The architecture would of course be open
       | source, and my goal would be to make the entire project be
       | available as some sort of { docker image / kubernetes cluster /
       | DO App / heroku thing / something } such that anyone can easily
       | launch their own instance without needing to dedicate 2+ hours to
       | the process, and more importantly any user can find activities to
       | join in on without needing to set up an account/provide
       | email/etc.
        
         | bhattisatish wrote:
         | Well, this could be because you are running out of memory,
         | which results in the yarn build process getting killed. The
         | simplest solution is to enable "swap" in your instance by using
         | the following commands:                 dd if=/dev/zero
         | of=/swapfile bs=1M count=1024       sudo chown root:root
         | /swapfile        chmod 600 /swapfile       mkswap /swapfile
         | swapon /swapfile       add /etc/fstab       /swapfile
         | swap                    swap           defaults        0 0
         | #echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness       sudo sysctl
         | vm.swappiness=10       add to /etc/sysctl.conf
         | vm.swappiness=10
         | 
         | All I am doing is creating a swap file of 1GB and enabling it
         | with a not so aggressive swappinness on the kernel.
        
         | prophesi wrote:
         | Once the docker installation is documented, it should take
         | considerably less time to self-host.
         | 
         | This is for `yarn build`, but perhaps it applies to `yarn
         | install` as well: there's a note in the documentation that says
         | compiling the front-end requires 2gb of RAM. You'll need to set
         | it to use only 1gb RAM to accommodate the $5 droplet's specs
         | via `NODE_BUILD_MEMORY=1024 yarn build`
         | 
         | As for the technology & stack, most of the code is from
         | Pleroma, essentially a lightweight Elixir/Phoenix version of
         | Mastodon, with Vue for the frontend. If there's any part of the
         | architecture that's closed, the project would highly appreciate
         | raising an issue, as it wishes to be a fully libre project.
        
         | ivarv wrote:
         | Where in the PNW are you located? Given the border closure it's
         | no longer feasible to organize international meetups.
        
       | jonstaab wrote:
       | Is it just me, or has "federated" come to mean just mean multi-
       | tenant SaaS (maybe with some features that cross boundaries)
       | that's also open source?
        
         | mxuribe wrote:
         | With all due respect, i think that might just be you. Email has
         | operated as federated for so many years, and while there are
         | certainly large providers like gmail, etc....There are also
         | plenty of non-multi-tenant, non-SaaS instances of email servers
         | (and associated mailboxes).
        
         | corobo wrote:
         | Does ActivityPub not count as federated for you?
         | 
         | https://docs.joinmobilizon.org/contribute/activity_pub/
        
         | detaro wrote:
         | Just you. Federation still means communication/collaboration
         | between independently run servers.
        
       | zanecraw wrote:
       | looks pretty dope!
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | Nice. But I'm curious how they deal with the network effect.
       | I.e., how do they motivate event organizers to post their events
       | on this platform too? And how do I convince my friends to RSVP on
       | this platform so I can see where they are going?
        
         | olah_1 wrote:
         | If users have to sign up (create an account) in the traditional
         | flow, I think this is dead in the water :/
        
           | amelius wrote:
           | Perhaps some scraper could help with cross-posting of events.
           | 
           | The tool can be named Facebook-dl :)
        
             | berkes wrote:
             | Mastodon, using the same underlying ActivityPub has several
             | "cross posting" solutions mostly to- and fro twitter. As
             | does pixelfed (the instagram for the fediverse) to and from
             | instagram.
             | 
             | I can only imagine that there will be some way to cross-
             | post to facebook, meetup or EventBrite, somewhere down the
             | line. Even if done by external parties. Especially facebook
             | because a lot of your audience may be there already. And to
             | many organizers "getting enough people to attend" is
             | probably more important than being fully decentralised and
             | privacy friendly.
        
           | hypersoar wrote:
           | You don't need an account to RSVP to events; you can
           | participate anonymously. That makes sense, since this is
           | designed with activists in mind.
        
         | riffic wrote:
         | > how do they motivate event organizers to post their events on
         | this platform too
         | 
         | In theory, the event organizers would have their own instance
         | and they would post the events directly onto that. This would
         | make sense for organizations with an existing technology
         | infrastructure.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | laurent123456 wrote:
       | Looks like they self-host their source code too:
       | https://framagit.org/framasoft/mobilizon/ It appears to be
       | developed in some language called "Euphoria"?? That's such a
       | strange choice and is going to seriously limit contributions from
       | other developers.
        
         | wishinghand wrote:
         | Looks like Elixir to me. Not hugely mainstream but I think it's
         | shed its niche status. Which folders have Euphoria in them?
        
           | Jtsummers wrote:
           | They based their code in part on Pleroma per something else I
           | read, which is written in Elixir.
        
           | yorwba wrote:
           | Yeah, their development guide lists Elixir (and Erlang),
           | PostgreSQL and NodeJS as dependencies. https://docs.joinmobil
           | izon.org/contribute/development/#witho...
        
         | Seirdy wrote:
         | Mobilizon is written in Elixir because it is based on Pleroma,
         | a Mastodon-compatible/Mastodon-alternative server for the
         | Fediverse. Elixir isn't one of the most popular langs out
         | there, but it is far from being a "niche" language.
         | 
         | Okay that was a lot of words. Maybe I should explain for those
         | less familiar:
         | 
         | Users on the Fediverse can interact without being aware of the
         | fact that their servers are running completely different
         | software. While Fediverse members such as Mastodon take
         | inspiration from Twitter, others have different focuses:
         | Peertube is YouTube inspired, Pixelfed is Instagram-inspired,
         | and some like Pleroma are kinda doing their own thing imo.
         | 
         | I personally prefer Pleroma to Mastodon, as evidenced from my
         | bio; it's lightweight, easier to set up, and has a great
         | variety of first- and third-party front-ends (including a
         | lightly-modified version of the Mastodon front-end and a
         | Gopher-accessible one).
         | 
         | It appears that Mobilizon devs wanted to create a new Fediverse
         | server with a different focus: something that warranted writing
         | a back-end based on Pleroma instead of just creating a new
         | Pleroma front-end. Basing off Pleroma was a good choice because
         | unlike Mastodon, Pleroma is lightweight enough to run off a
         | singe-board computer like a Raspberry Pi. Being written in
         | Elixir definitely has a lot to do with this.
        
         | Vosporos wrote:
         | What is this "Euphoria" you are talking about?
        
       | bovermyer wrote:
       | This is a great endeavor and I hope it succeeds.
       | 
       | I only have one question - does it allow for private events?
        
         | severine wrote:
         | _does it allow for private events?_
         | 
         | Seems so: https://docs.joinmobilizon.org/use/events/create-
         | events/#who...
        
         | HourglassFR wrote:
         | Yes, if I understand their FAQ correctly
         | 
         | https://joinmobilizon.org/en/faq/
        
       | mikeruhl wrote:
       | Thank you so much for this. I have wanted something like this
       | since getting off Facebook.
        
       | forgotmypw17 wrote:
       | What an amazing looking project!
       | 
       | I think this type of "someone in the group runs an instance" type
       | deal will become more and more frequent.
       | 
       | Each family/community will have a "tech guy" or two who manages
       | this type of thing, maybe on an offline device, and everyone
       | chips in a couple satoshi per year for the hardware and network.
       | 
       | If you store your data in something easy like text files, you can
       | even have several redundant devices, all for the price of a
       | couple raspberry pis.
       | 
       | Imagine a raspberry pi with a terabyte of storage attached.
       | Certainly that's enough for a "Familybook" of your closest
       | people.
       | 
       | This is the type of device I am developing for today. I'm writing
       | the simplest HTML possible, always no-JS friendly, using the most
       | common interfaces supported by the most common web servers, and
       | completely portable with just a zip file of text files. :)
        
       | Quanttek wrote:
       | This looks fantastic and I like the focus! I am not sure if it's
       | so great to have the getting-started info spread out over
       | multiple site - joinmobilizon.org and mobilizon.org - though
        
       | solarkraft wrote:
       | That looks amazing! From its look it seems a lot like it'd be a
       | replacement for Meetup/Eventbrite, which is something I've been
       | waiting for for a while.
       | 
       | Framasoft is great!
        
         | suyash wrote:
         | yes more of a meetup.com alternative than anything. However the
         | hard part is how do I migrate my large meetup community to a
         | new platform.
        
           | monksy wrote:
           | Lots of advanced warning, lots of emails, lots of inperson
           | reminders, etc.
           | 
           | For me, I ended up sending multiple emails and killing the
           | group. (I'm not paying meetup "half price" for an essentially
           | useless service. (Ok, the only thing it holds is membership
           | data.. but they expect you to pay for zoom to hold your
           | meetups [which those don't work])
        
       | cnr wrote:
       | JIT news for polish women (and men) protesting against stripping
       | away abortion rights. The more independent communication apps the
       | better :)
        
       | Nextgrid wrote:
       | I feel like this misses the point.
       | 
       | People dislike Facebook and other centralized platforms not
       | because they're centralized per-se, but because the user
       | experience is terrible (due to mismatched incentives - these
       | platforms make money off ads, so their only objective is to make
       | you engage with the ads as much as possible).
       | 
       | The solution is a platform that doesn't have these mismatched
       | incentives (either paid for, ran by donations, etc) but that
       | otherwise has the user experience of the mainsteam platforms.
       | 
       | This reads like a tech demo where the tech and decentralization
       | is the selling point, but the truth is, the masses don't
       | know/care about that and rightfully so. The same applies to
       | Mastodon and similar projects.
        
         | grey_earthling wrote:
         | From the FAQ:
         | 
         | > We do not want to reproduce the toxicity of Facebook.
         | Surveillance capitalism uses the mechanisms of the attention
         | economy to lock up our time, capture our behaviour and impose
         | advertising on us.
         | 
         | > Mobilizon does not depend on such a business model: this is
         | an opportunity to try to do better, by doing things
         | differently.
         | 
         | => https://joinmobilizon.org/en/faq#facebook
        
         | HourglassFR wrote:
         | I don't think the point is to replace Facebook&Co though. It is
         | specifically a tool developped for political activists.
         | Everybody can use it of course, it is free software. Given that
         | context the decentralization feature is most definitively a
         | crucial feature.
         | 
         | https://joinmobilizon.org/en/faq/#facebook
         | 
         | And even more broadly, the whole point of Framasoft is to offer
         | tools to use the internet in a decentralized way. This is not
         | limited to this particular tool, they have many other project.
         | All offering an inferior user experience than the existing
         | solutions by the usual FAANG giants of course but again the
         | point is decentralization and freedom.
        
           | candu wrote:
           | Exactly this. From one viewpoint, https://pad.riseup.net/ is
           | just a worse version of Google Docs, and most people will
           | never use it. From another, it's a vital service for
           | preserving the anonymity and security of activists, and
           | comparisons to Google Docs are moot.
           | 
           | In other words, these tools quite effectively solve the pain
           | of a small but clearly-defined group of people - turns out
           | this approach is useful beyond the startup world!
        
         | Ericson2314 wrote:
         | > I feel like this misses the point.
         | 
         | > The solution is a platform that doesn't have these mismatched
         | incentives (either paid for, ran by donations, etc) but that
         | otherwise has the user experience of the mainsteam platforms.
         | 
         | The argument by people in favor of this stuff is that federated
         | technologies _best_ avoid and resist those mismatched
         | incentives, because any centralized gatekeeper, not matter how
         | benevolently founded, always has the temptation to ignore it 's
         | charter and become a rentier.
         | 
         | Think about the recent .org debacle, or even the Mondragon
         | Corporation employing non-member labor.
        
         | ravenstine wrote:
         | > The solution is a platform that doesn't have these mismatched
         | incentives (either paid for, ran by donations, etc) but that
         | otherwise has the user experience of the mainsteam platforms.
         | 
         | Isn't it kind of inevitable that those incentives manifest
         | themselves? A company can run a centralized platform, do a good
         | job of it, then get bought out for millions(if not billions) by
         | a large corporation and redesigned to maximize ad revenue and
         | the egos of those looking for greater job titles. This isn't
         | exactly unheard of. Decentralization would supposedly section
         | this kind of thing off if it even happens at all.
         | 
         | You're right that the average person doesn't care about
         | decentralization, let alone understand it. That's fine. Before
         | Facebook, people used forums supported by vBulletin, and those
         | were effectively "decentralized" in the sense that they weren't
         | all owned by the same entity. The only difference was that
         | there wasn't sharing of data between 2 or more web forums, like
         | there could be with something that supports ActivityPub or the
         | like.
        
         | aklemm wrote:
         | Step one is dev buy-in, then people start federating it and
         | THEY help realize the UX needs. /imo
        
         | dagurp wrote:
         | One of the main things keeping me on Facebook is fear of
         | missing out on events. This gives people who are not on
         | Facebook a chance to stay in the loop.
        
         | kemenaran wrote:
         | It seems Mobilizon invested a great deal in the usability of
         | this tool.
         | 
         | (Not specifically the visual design, but the ease of use and
         | the matching of user needs).
         | 
         | I've seen projects advertising decentralization as the main
         | selling point. Mobilizon seems to also push strong on the user
         | experience, and I'm glad they do.
        
         | deanclatworthy wrote:
         | > People dislike Facebook and other centralized platforms not
         | because they're centralized per-se, but because the user
         | experience is terrible
         | 
         | I'm not sure I agree here. My anecdote is that the experience
         | of Facebook events is superb. People are prompted to fill in
         | pretty good basic information, can discuss arrangements on the
         | "wall", and I'm reminded about my attendance before the event
         | multiple times. The invites also come into a place where I
         | already spend a fair bit of time. I don't know anyone who makes
         | events outside of Facebook within my circle of friends.
         | 
         | > This reads like a tech demo where the tech and
         | decentralization is the selling point, but the truth is, the
         | masses don't know/care about that and rightfully so. The same
         | applies to Mastodon and similar projects.
         | 
         | I agree with this. Until the mainstream narrative realises that
         | giving away all of our personal info is a faux pas, engaging
         | with platforms like this is limited to activists and those who
         | have an incentive for privacy.
        
       | DarkWiiPlayer wrote:
       | Reading through the page I just couldn't shake off the feeling
       | that the illustrations remind me a lot of the Pepper and Carrot
       | comic.
       | 
       | I scrolled down to the footer almost expecting to find the name
       | David Revoy there and indeed it was :D
        
       | agumonkey wrote:
       | What else is there in this field ?
        
         | jarofgreen wrote:
         | If you mean the field of people organising events on open
         | source decentralised software, I think there is:
         | 
         | * https://framagit.org/les/gancio
         | 
         | * https://github.com/lowercasename/gathio
         | 
         | * https://github.com/GetTogetherComm/GetTogether
         | 
         | * https://github.com/hometown-fork/hometown Mastodon fork with
         | basic event stuff
         | 
         | (This is not to take away from Mobilizon - congrats to them!)
        
         | Seirdy wrote:
         | If you mean other federated FOSS alternatives to mainstream
         | social media, I gave a brief overview in another comment [0].
         | You can get a bird's-eye view at https://fediverse.party/ or a
         | more detailed look at https://fediverse.network/. Many of these
         | services use the Activitypub protocol to allow them to inter-
         | operate. Two examples with excellent interop are Pleroma and
         | Mastodon; as a Pleroma user, I can't even tell the difference
         | between a Pleroma and Mastodon user until I open another user's
         | profile on their own instance.
         | 
         | [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24911239
        
         | eeZah7Ux wrote:
         | Meetup.com - which is closed, centralized, and shockingly
         | expensive.
        
           | monksy wrote:
           | $180 per year.
        
         | berkes wrote:
         | With field you mean "organising events"? If so, Meetup.com,
         | Eventbrite and Facebook are probably the most famous.
        
           | agumonkey wrote:
           | actually I wasn't sure of the whole surface of mobilizon .. I
           | thought it did more, thanks
        
       | throwawaysea wrote:
       | What is Mobilizon's policy on deplatforming, censorship, etc. How
       | will they protect against owner/employee bias? I ask this because
       | Mastodon's founders also pitched a federated tool to the world
       | but then turned out to be very much the same authoritarian pro-
       | censorship actor as the centralized platform we'd all like to get
       | away from.
        
         | GoblinSlayer wrote:
         | That's the difference: they aren't centralized.
        
         | Jtsummers wrote:
         | How is Mastodon censored? Specific instances or is the general
         | community actively censoring content across instances?
        
           | throwawaysea wrote:
           | My understanding is that the project founder and/or leads are
           | pursuing a campaign to pressure all instances to not peer
           | with instances on their political blacklist, and adding those
           | who refuse to their peering demands to the blacklist. In
           | effect the "fediverse" that is claimed as a benefit is in
           | name only. I'm not sure what benefit the project offers
           | anymore over centralized platforms since it is becoming the
           | same thing as a result.
        
             | mattbk1 wrote:
             | Each instance is free to federate or not with every other
             | instance. You have every right to post what you want, but
             | there's no requirement for other people to listen.
        
             | Seirdy wrote:
             | There exist a number of self-described free speech
             | extremist instances, and moderated instances that only
             | blacklist spammers like bot servers. There also exist
             | instances that will blacklist servers with high levels of
             | hate speech. You can pick or create an instance that meets
             | your wants and needs, but other instances can exercise
             | their freedom of association and choose not to federate
             | with you.
             | 
             | Things on the fediverse are also less black-and-white than
             | you're portraying them. Some instances will prevent one
             | instance's posts from showing up in the default public
             | timeline of the whole known network, but will still
             | federate with them; users will still be able to follow or
             | be followed by members of the filtered instance normally.
             | 
             | Users on Mastodon can also migrate their account to other
             | Mastodon instances and keep their followers, but migrating
             | from Mastodon to Pleroma is a bit lacking; fortunately, you
             | can still put a redirect on your profile for future
             | followers.
             | 
             | TLDR: no, I don't think the fediverse is just like
             | centralized social media.
        
       | Hitton wrote:
       | mozilizon.org page says:
       | 
       | >try Mobilizon
       | 
       | >Create a fake account and fake events on demo.mobilizon.org
       | 
       | But for some reason this fake account requires quite real email
       | address. No thanks.
        
         | minerjoe wrote:
         | Their little tour recommends using a throwaway email.
        
       | jarofgreen wrote:
       | I'm very pleased to see this launch, but have one feature request
       | - and I'm posting it here because it's a request I would make to
       | anyone doing event software.
       | 
       | Please have open feeds in iCal format for your site, including
       | one that lets people get all public data.
       | 
       | This will make the data on your website so much more reusable and
       | useful.
       | 
       | And definetly iCal - it's so popular, and most personal calendars
       | can even import it directly.
       | 
       | Yes, it's odd text format is a pain, but there are libraries in
       | almost every language you can use.
       | 
       | Mobilizon has iCal export for a single event, but not for all
       | public events on the site. (I did have a Mastodon chat with them
       | about this but can't find their replies now)
       | 
       | But definitely congrats to Framasoft for this :-)
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICalendar
        
         | glenstein wrote:
         | I hadn't thought of this, but this is a great suggestion and I
         | hope your suggestion gets implemented!
        
       | WC3w6pXxgGd wrote:
       | This is created by "activists" who want to organize public
       | protests and other disruptive events. ALWAYS be skeptical of
       | products/services created by people like this.
       | 
       | Remember: if they, in any way, suspect you of wrongthink, all the
       | data you thought was yours suddenly becomes public and you will
       | be hunted.
        
       | linspace wrote:
       | This got me surprised:
       | 
       | "Mobilizon is designed so that you can follow the news of a
       | group, but not of an individual : it is impossible to follow a
       | single profile. In Mobilizon, profiles have no << wall >>, <<
       | thread >> or << story >> : only groups can publish posts. The
       | goal is to get rid of the self-promotional reflexes where we
       | stage our lives to be the person at the center of our followers.
       | With Mobilizon, it is not the ego but the collective that
       | counts."""
       | 
       | I understand the motivation but it leaves me with the strange
       | sensation of exchanging one kind of centralization with another.
       | It doesn't click with me.
        
         | malandrew wrote:
         | Seeing that a significant portion of activists are "activists"
         | for purely reasons feeding their own ego and self worth, I see
         | this as a net win for weeding such people out. That said, if
         | this does catch on, you can probably expect such people to
         | start signing their content even if the system specifically
         | doesn't support it.
        
         | fwsgonzo wrote:
         | Considering how vapid the current lineup of social networking
         | is, I'm willing to see how it turns out.
         | 
         | There are some other great features too, but I didn't see
         | anything about video-conferencing, which would be a killer
         | feature.
        
           | GoblinSlayer wrote:
           | There's (was?) https://framatalk.org/ which is jitsi meet
           | https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet
        
         | GoblinSlayer wrote:
         | As I understand, it's a forum. Some forums allow you to see
         | posts made by certain user, just mobilizon doesn't. Like
         | ycombinator is not your personal blog, but a group, to which
         | you can contribute.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-10-27 23:00 UTC)