[HN Gopher] Metal Spheres Swarm Together to Create Freeform Modu...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Metal Spheres Swarm Together to Create Freeform Modular Robots
        
       Author : headalgorithm
       Score  : 51 points
       Date   : 2020-10-31 15:37 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (spectrum.ieee.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (spectrum.ieee.org)
        
       | jugg1es wrote:
       | Is it using an electromagnet? or is it moving a permanent magnet
       | around inside?
        
         | utexaspunk wrote:
         | It looks like a permanent magnet:
         | https://spectrum.ieee.org/image/MzcxMTU3OA.jpeg
        
       | wintorez wrote:
       | I have a hunch that we will discover (not invent) the strong AI
       | not in Neural Networks, but in Swarm logic. Infinitely complex
       | systems can emerge from simple units multiplied exponentially. I
       | still can't stop being amazed by crazy thing they have discovered
       | in Conway's Game of Life.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | abeppu wrote:
         | This is an interesting direction. But what is the critical
         | attribute of a swarm that would give rise to strong AI?
         | 
         | The argentine ant supercolony is an enormous swarm, but we
         | don't really expect to be able to have a conversation with it,
         | or see it deal with abstract concepts, but they can solve lots
         | of local approximate optimization problems.
         | 
         | Slime molds are single cells but you might think of them as a
         | swarm of nuclei and organelles that can solve hard optimization
         | problems when in the right form, but again they don't seem like
         | a general intelligence.
         | 
         | Is the missing piece that swarms must be of agents with certain
         | properties? Or that the interactions between the members of a
         | swarm need to have some specific properties?
        
           | wintorez wrote:
           | One more thing, I think the viability of communicating with
           | an intelligence of a different kind is still an open
           | question. It's speculated that intelligences that are too
           | different in form or quantity might not be able to
           | communicate with each other at all.
           | 
           | Likely the most probable scenario of our contact with
           | extraterrestrial intelligence is they will completely ignore
           | us, and will not attempt to communicate, or even if they
           | attempt to, we will not perceive it as communication.
        
             | 6510 wrote:
             | Communication needs to have purpose. Negotiating some kind
             | of trade seems the way to go. We can provide ants with
             | unimaginable "wealth" and they have unique skills that
             | could be useful to us. Just not useful enough for us to
             | make the effort?
        
               | wintorez wrote:
               | What I wanted to suggest is even if this communication is
               | possible. This question has been the main theme of two of
               | Stanislaw Lem's books, "His Master's Voice" and
               | "Solaris".
               | 
               | Essentially, an intelligence can be so alien that the
               | concept of communicating with it would be impossible.
        
           | 6510 wrote:
           | Between the nodes and in their configuration [by lack of
           | vocabulary] something like an n dimensional ink blob arrises.
           | If this just happens to map reasonably to some n dimensional
           | problem and the parameters of the swarm can be tweaked
           | (evolve) to better map to it you can have logic with few
           | moving parts. A simple example would be to first place the
           | sugar pot in random locations until it ends up next to the
           | coffee machine from where it migrates to the coffee table.
           | The bags of sugar (to refill the pot) move around similarly.
        
             | wintorez wrote:
             | I was on the same opinion as well. But I would like to
             | borrow form Conway's Game of Life. The initial rules are
             | simple, and to the untrained person, it just creates random
             | blobs that disappear after a while. But then we have things
             | like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2vgICfQawE
        
           | bonestormii_ wrote:
           | The interesting property is embedded in the parent's use of
           | the word "emerge" I think. It is the property of emergence
           | that takes swarms of ants and forms an organized colony, or a
           | network of nerves that creates intelligence.
           | 
           | I think it's something along the lines of.... randomized
           | interactions of entities, constrained only by the attributes
           | of the entities.
        
             | wintorez wrote:
             | One thing that makes me think that is possible is Conway's
             | Game of Life. The rules are simple, and on the face value,
             | doesn't create anything exciting, but then we have this:
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2vgICfQawE
        
           | wintorez wrote:
           | You raised some very valid questions. I'm speculating here,
           | so take my answer as sort of sci-fi premise. I think as the
           | internet and IoT grows, it becomes more decentralized, it
           | will be come unfeasible for all these nodes to communicate to
           | some central nodes (i.e. servers), so we will move toward
           | automated peer-to-peer communication, with some simple
           | routing and optimization rules.
           | 
           | These of these nodes automatically detect, connect, and
           | communicate with the nearest node. Think of it as bluetooth
           | vs wi-fi hybrid of the future. The aim is to make a more
           | resilient internet by eliminating single points of failure
           | (i.e. AWS servers down), but the end result will be some sort
           | of rudimentary network, that will lead to "emergence" of some
           | sort.
           | 
           | I just realized I've been describing "Edge computing".
        
             | theamk wrote:
             | I cannot imagine this happening in the world we live in.
             | 
             | I would not my IOT lightbulb (or worse, a camera) to
             | communicate with my neighbor's house -- there are
             | significant availability, privacy and security concerns.
             | 
             | The same way, I remember seeing lots of open WiFi networks,
             | twenty years ago... and now they are virtually gone.
             | 
             | Instead, it would be still centralized servers, but with
             | more reliability -- think fiber + 5G backup at home, and
             | multi-region/cloudfare workers approach in the cloud.
        
               | sadness3 wrote:
               | There are precedents for this type peer-to-peer
               | operation, where inherently limited protocols achieve a
               | subset of functionality with acceptable privacy
               | implications. For example, videogame distribution clients
               | which download using a torrent-style process.
        
               | Shared404 wrote:
               | I believe there is an option to download/upload Windows
               | updates in the same way.
        
               | wintorez wrote:
               | I really don't think we get to decide if we allow this or
               | not. A company like Cloudflare or any other edge
               | computing provider is easily in the position to make this
               | happen, for completely innocent and valid reasons.
               | 
               | What I'd like to emphasis is what I'm suggesting will be
               | the unwanted side-effect of this type of peer-to-peer
               | communication.
        
         | navaati wrote:
         | If that happens, it'll be so far from human intelligence, and
         | thus probably terrifying !
        
           | wintorez wrote:
           | My guess, which reads more like sci-fi than anything is, the
           | strong AI will emerge as a side-effect of IoT communicating
           | with each other. Once the number of connected things hits a
           | critical mass (I'm talking about billions), it will happen.
        
             | baxtr wrote:
             | That my friend sounds very similar to a famous movie from
             | the 80s!
        
               | wintorez wrote:
               | Which one? :)
        
             | tobr wrote:
             | There are already many billions of devices connected to the
             | internet.
        
               | wintorez wrote:
               | We're still a few iterations away from what I call the
               | primordial network that could lead to that. We need some
               | sort of automatic peer-to-peer communication between
               | nodes, that is not in place yet, but I'm guessing will
               | become norm in the future to solve a different problem.
               | 
               | I think "Edge computing" is taking us to that direction.
        
       | carapace wrote:
       | Yes, and instead of small metal spheres you make big geodesic
       | spheres that are also kites!
       | 
       | (Cf. Alexander Bell's kites & Bucky Fuller's geodesic mega-
       | structures.)
        
       | sadness3 wrote:
       | This seems too complex, too prone to failure, and too difficult
       | to keep powered. I imagine the first industrially viable modular
       | robots will be solid-state, with a mains power supply which is
       | able to connect ambiently or arbitrarily. Power distribution
       | circuits will be dynamic, and the abundant power will be used to
       | control multiple electromagnets per module.
        
       | 1over137 wrote:
       | Reminds me of the bitbots in The Dervish House by Ian McDonald.
        
       | mleonhard wrote:
       | Would holes in the steel reduce the magnetic properties very
       | much?
       | 
       | Holes could enable sensors, charging, and optical communication.
       | For inter-node communication, radio signals can conduct between
       | the shells and would be far more robust than optical. But optical
       | would be more resilient against interference, jamming, and
       | eavesdropping.
        
       | zipotm wrote:
       | Looks like an alpha version of Genisys T1000
        
       | zizee wrote:
       | Keep iterating on this concept and eventually we'll have liquid
       | metal T-1000 like robots.
       | 
       | Makes me wonder if Arnie could have defeated him/it by throwing
       | lots of strong magnets into the mix.
        
       | robertlagrant wrote:
       | This feels like those little robots from Big Hero 6 made real. I
       | love it.
        
         | UnbugMe wrote:
         | For me, a yellow devil, ala Megaman came to mind.
         | http://shmuplations.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/megaman17...
         | 
         | If they could make it so you could control them as a whole,
         | once linked, then they would be getting somewhere.
         | 
         | Maybe have some other RC pieces that are bars and the spheres
         | could be the joints. Have it all linked with some IK action.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-10-31 23:00 UTC)