[HN Gopher] Old Dogs, New Research and the Secrets of Aging
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Old Dogs, New Research and the Secrets of Aging
        
       Author : gmays
       Score  : 53 points
       Date   : 2020-11-13 15:17 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | asdf333 wrote:
       | I've noticed more health and aging related articles on this site.
       | I wonder if its a sign the HN community is getting older. :)
        
         | perardi wrote:
         | Could be that "pandemic" thing making people a bit more
         | cognizant of mortality.
        
           | throwaway201103 wrote:
           | The people dying of COVID are for the most part over age 70.
           | Many are over 80. This is an age where death and disease are
           | unremarkable.
        
             | jjulius wrote:
             | That's not necessarily what OP's saying. My inference is
             | that OP is suggesting that a constantly prevalent pandemic
             | makes people more likely to think about their own health
             | and mortality in a broader sense than they might if there
             | weren't a pandemic.
        
             | flavor8 wrote:
             | > for the most part over age 70.
             | 
             | CDC categories don't line up to "70" that well, but there
             | are plenty of younger deaths.
             | 
             | 51% are 74 or younger.
             | 
             | 33% are 64 or younger.
             | 
             | https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-COVID-19-Death-
             | Counts-...
        
               | belval wrote:
               | I think you should check the very link you sent because
               | only 21% are 64 or younger. The ranges overlap.
        
           | jolmg wrote:
           | These articles have been getting popular since before the
           | pandemic.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | melling wrote:
         | The site is almost 15 years old so it's possible.
         | 
         | People become a little more self-aware as they get older.
         | 
         | First you know someone famous that died young from a horrible
         | disease.
         | 
         | Next you personally know someone who died from a disease.
         | 
         | Then you get older and wonder if the "1 in 3 people" might be
         | you.
        
           | drran wrote:
           | I take anti-aging drugs for about 10 years. I heard about
           | them at HN.
        
             | pmiller2 wrote:
             | How has that worked out for you? What are you taking?
        
             | api wrote:
             | What's in your stack bruh?
        
             | reducesuffering wrote:
             | Betting this is berberine or metformin?
        
         | ve55 wrote:
         | I think a lot of it is that we're just now starting to get to
         | where we need to be as a civilization for anti-aging to start
         | to become something that not only sounds feasible, but is
         | feasible. I've noticed interest steadily increasing over the
         | last 5 or so years, and think this will be a huge topic in the
         | next few decades.
        
           | grishka wrote:
           | The aging-related research has been going for quite some
           | time, so it's not surprising it's starting to bear fruit, for
           | now in the form of better understanding of the underlying
           | mechanisms. The consensus seems to be shifting from "wear-
           | and-tear model" to a series pre-programmed epigenetic
           | alterations, which, to me at least as a layman, feels more
           | plausible. There's a good chance we'll see some anti-aging
           | treatments released within our lifetimes. We might end up
           | being the first generation to have reached the longevity
           | escape velocity.
           | 
           | The reason it's only starting to emerge now is as far as I
           | understand that molecular biology is a relatively new field,
           | and the related technologies simply didn't exist not so long
           | ago.
        
       | rostifar wrote:
       | It's odd that this article doesn't mentioned Celevity, which is
       | definitely one of the big players in this field.
        
       | slacka wrote:
       | From my grandparent to me, there has always been German Shepherds
       | in our family. Starting the 80's all of our dogs started dying
       | much earlier, ~6-7 of cancer. In the early 2000's, we switched to
       | raw diet from premium store bought kibble to raw. Sure enough,
       | not only did their coat improve not a single cancer death under
       | age of 13. I know it's anecdotal, but in my dog world circle and
       | family, we've all observed similar results.
       | 
       | It's a cruel that our best friends and most loyal companions live
       | such short lives as it is. Giving them top nutrition is a small
       | price for the added years.
       | 
       | As to how this applies to humans? If you want to live a long and
       | healthy life: avoid processed foods.
        
       | rantwasp wrote:
       | aging (and anti-aging medication) has the potential to become the
       | next big thing.
       | 
       | My dog is part if the DogAgingProject and it's really exciting to
       | see some focus on something that impacts all of us.
        
         | season2episode3 wrote:
         | I have such mixed feelings about this.
         | 
         | It's not a great movie but this really does remind me of
         | Elysium, in that we're truly heading for a world where those
         | with means can live indefinitely. And those without means...
        
       | asdfman123 wrote:
       | The best thing I learned from this article: to calculate a dog's
       | human age, you don't multiply their age times 7 (7x). You use the
       | following formula:
       | 
       | ln(x)*16+31
       | 
       | It makes sense, because a 1-year-old dog definitely seems much
       | more grown up than a 7 year old kid.
        
         | antisthenes wrote:
         | Umm...doesn't the formula imply that the dog age starts at 31?
         | 
         | That makes no sense either. My 1 year old dog is definitely not
         | a 31 year old adult as far as behavior goes (incidentally, I am
         | myself ~31,).
         | 
         | I'd put 1 year approximately equivalent to a teenager,
         | depending on the size of the breed (12 year old for larger
         | breeds, late teens for small breeds)
        
         | Ancalagon wrote:
         | Anecdotally I'm assuming this equation must be breed-specific
         | because I've had a number of dogs 8+ years old that did not
         | appear to act or look very senior.
        
           | duskwuff wrote:
           | Playing around with the numbers a bit, I think it's pretty
           | seriously wrong.
           | 
           | A 6-month old dog is still a child, in dog terms. This
           | formula says they're nearly 20 years old; I'd be inclined to
           | say that the "right" answer is more like 15 years, if not
           | less.
           | 
           | A 1-year old dog is beyond adolescence but is still maturing,
           | but this formula says they're 31 years old, well into
           | adulthood.
           | 
           | A 5-year old dog is in the prime of their life; this formula
           | says they're 56 years old, well into the range of what we'd
           | consider a senior.
           | 
           | A 30-year old dog would set a new world record. (The oldest
           | dog known was about 29.5 years old.) This formula maps that
           | to 85 years, which is old, but not extraordinarily so.
        
           | asdfman123 wrote:
           | I think it has to be because I've heard small dogs age more
           | slowly. Maybe there's a way to adjust for weight/breed that I
           | could find if I were willing to dig through the original
           | research paper.
        
           | Legion wrote:
           | Right? My yellow labrador is pushing 11 and he's all but
           | indistinguishable from his 2-year-old self, aside from a
           | relatively minor decline in energy.
           | 
           | We call him the Eternal Puppy. We expected aging was going to
           | catch up by now. Still very little sign that it's happening.
           | 
           | If I had that dog's energy, I would never be out of shape.
        
       | jonas21 wrote:
       | It's unfortunate that the chart in the NYT article shows the
       | incorrect Labrador:Tom Hanks mapping. The figure from the paper
       | with the correct mapping is here:
       | 
       | https://marlin-prod.literatumonline.com/cms/attachment/f65cb...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-11-13 23:01 UTC)