[HN Gopher] Show HN: I Rebuilt MySpace from 2007
___________________________________________________________________
Show HN: I Rebuilt MySpace from 2007
Author : partyguy
Score : 478 points
Date : 2020-11-29 15:42 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (spacehey.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (spacehey.com)
| JimWestergren wrote:
| 18 year old, cool man. Respect.
| partyguy wrote:
| thank you :D
| blhack wrote:
| This is really great you guys. Good job! It really makes me
| realize how much I miss the old internet.
| gabereiser wrote:
| Haha, I love the logo. Just a peg person saying "hey". This takes
| me back for sure. I would ditch the footer disclaimer though
| unless you really are trying to recreate MySpace in its entirety,
| which is a legal grey area. I'm all on board for a MySpace-esque
| experience again.
| aerovistae wrote:
| I'm curious, is password storage using 2007 techniques too? Or
| are things like that a little more up-to-date? :P
| cft wrote:
| Since all MySpace passwords have been leaked online (my email
| often gets spammed with my real MySpace password in the
| subject), why not implement logins with that database?
| landerwust wrote:
| Totally loving this. Did you reverse engineer the layouts from
| screenshots? Please tell me somewhere there is a snippet of
| original HTML snarfed from archive.org :)
|
| Finally you're totally missing a beat here -- MySpace lived and
| died by its community of indie bands. Ditch that dodgy mainstream
| iTunes Music wrapper and make the actual music function work
| again. You never know, you might strike a nostalgic retro chord
| within some niche of the indie community (and definitely that's
| where this thing should be shared!)
| partyguy wrote:
| Hey, I'm An, the creator of SpaceHey! Thank you!! Yes, I looked
| at a ton of old screenshots, wikipedia sites and archive.org
| pages! That's how I designed most of it! I'm currently looking
| into all of the legal stuff which comes with music sharing, but
| a dedicated music feature is definitely planned! The iTunes API
| is just a temporary thing to fill it with some content!
| 5986043handy wrote:
| What tech stack did you end up using for the backend?
| AndrewLaneX wrote:
| https://twitter.com/AnTheMaker/status/1332224148551118848?s
| =...
| D_B_Koopa wrote:
| for it to be legitimate you need to use ColdFusion and then
| do a half assed port to .net.
| 83457 wrote:
| I was at a CF conference with MySpace as a speaker and
| they talked about how often they went down but that they
| were switching to another CF engine with .net
| capabilities (BlueDragon). Their discussions and jokes
| about instability and going down due to bad code updates
| were really cringy and gave the impression that their
| platform was a mess.
| rmason wrote:
| Pretty certain we were at the same conference. There
| development practices horrified the group I was with in
| the audience. At a time that a new competitor appeared
| (Facebook) they made the fatal mistake of rewriting their
| software in dot Net. No new features for a year or more.
| Joel Spolsky wrote a pretty famous essay about the wisdom
| of doing that.
|
| https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/04/06/things-you-
| should-...
| adrr wrote:
| Performance was the feature. Friendster should have been
| social network of that era but they couldn't scale and
| had to shutdown new user registration. Same thing
| happened to Twitter but they had no competitor in short
| form social networking.
| lowcodetv wrote:
| Pownce?
|
| "Twitter on steroids" [0]
|
| [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pownce
| conjectures wrote:
| Thanks for this one, it encapsulates a feeling I've had
| for a while but could never verablize so well.
| jeremycarter wrote:
| I live by that blog post.
| jjeaff wrote:
| I had an older friend that worked at CF when I was a
| teenager. He taught me a bit about relational databases
| and some other important stuff as he was one of the only
| developers I knew growing up.
|
| I remember him telling me how I was wasting my time
| building in php/MySQL since CF was the future and serious
| companies wouldn't be looking for php developers. Glad I
| never pulled the trigger and bought their expensive IDE.
| 83457 wrote:
| No expensive IDE was necessary and there are open source
| servers now. Regardless, you made the right choice.
| bigiain wrote:
| For proper early 2000s nostalgia, I reckon the backend
| should actually be Apache mod_perl, with the ".cfm"
| extension script aliased to Perl CGI scripts because
| management tell everybody "it's running on Adobe!"...
| zingermc wrote:
| <cfdump var="bad_memories"/>
| rangoon626 wrote:
| Do a soundcloud integration like poolside fm did
| codeulike wrote:
| Yes this is a good point - people with music to share will
| probably have it on Soundcloud or Bandcamp already, just
| add Soundcloud/Bandcamp embedding and you're all set
| peterburkimsher wrote:
| How about the Dragon Hoard? Files are hosted on Archive.org,
| and have been for a year and a half without being taken down.
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19569865
| JMTQp8lwXL wrote:
| The rebuild doesn't appear to be using React or Angular. Keeping
| it true to 2007-style server-side rendering.
| nobleach wrote:
| You'd need to build it in ColdFusion cfm pages to really
| capture that original flavor. They migrated to ASP.NET at some
| point before everyone left.
| est31 wrote:
| SSR is also 2020 style. Most websites out there use it.
| Aeolun wrote:
| Isn't it great?!
| cutitout wrote:
| Playing around with it made me realize just _how_ much I miss
| those good old derpy days, and how many great times I had on
| myspace and then mostly forgot about. It made me a bit emotional
| even. Thank you!
|
| I don't have that much time atm, but I can't _wait_ to get into
| the CSS and whatnot <3
| criddell wrote:
| What's the connection to tibush.com?
| webwanderings wrote:
| Someone's soon going to recreate the facebook!
|
| Is it just me or nobody realize that the likes of MySpace started
| the downfall of the original Internet before it became "social
| media"?
|
| Nostalgia of a simple web page is fine (and this is a nice
| implementation no doubt), but why recreate something that leads
| to something that is predictable?
|
| Instead, recreate usenet with better privacy and mobile adoption.
| Usenet is what they killed before the promise of the Internet
| could be realized.
| [deleted]
| onion2k wrote:
| Cool. If anyone wants to connect -
| https://spacehey.com/profile?id=316
| arthurcolle wrote:
| JK Rowling really joined this? Lol
| ASpaceCowboi wrote:
| NARUTO is back!!!
|
| Gotta bring back the chibi art styles
| comprev wrote:
| NextDNS is complaining about the domain and blocks it. Anyone
| else had this issue?
| joshmanders wrote:
| Nope, I'm on NextDNS and haven't had issues since he first
| announced it.
| GoatHerders2 wrote:
| It's a shame about the name.
|
| It might have succeeded!
| typh00n wrote:
| despite the opinion of some others here i _loved_ the old 2008
| facebook. it's so sad how it all turned out 12 years later.
| nv-vn wrote:
| I think the 2008ish version of the internet was just a much
| happier place. Part of why HN feels like a breath of fresh air
| still
| michaelmrose wrote:
| I like this better than facebook.
| IgorPartola wrote:
| Could you make the login form's email field have type="email"?
| Helps on mobile.
| partyguy wrote:
| Good idea! I changed it!
| Toxygene wrote:
| I'm not sure if/when it changed on the site, but MySpace listed
| the time comments were made in the comment posters local timezone
| instead of the readers timezone. It was such a strange thing that
| I still remember it decades later.
| [deleted]
| pell wrote:
| When I saw the title, I assumed I would just like it for the heck
| of taking a look into the past. But in reality the nostalgia hit
| very effectively, I really started remembering very good and
| interesting times on that website I had when i was a teen. You've
| done a really good job of capturing its magic.
| rado wrote:
| Wait, where's Tom? Seriously though, with a little visual touch
| up this could become good.
| nv-vn wrote:
| Someone needs to do the same for YouTube ca. 2007
| barnabee wrote:
| Neat!
|
| I'd sign up if there was an option to throw a few bucks your way
| and have absolutely guaranteed zero tracking, ads, or sharing/use
| of my data for anything other than what's strictly necessary to
| run the site itself.
| rocky1138 wrote:
| I wouldn't mind ads if they were static or, at worst, .gif. No
| tracking, no javascript, just a simple banner.
| meekmockmook wrote:
| Id pay 5 to 10 a month for no ads at all.
| meekmockmook wrote:
| As someone with extremely deep contempt for Silicon Valley, Big
| Tech monopolies, and modern social media culture, this brought a
| tear to my eye.It was so easy to make new friends online once
| upon a time.
|
| The fascist uniformity of modern social platforms has left a
| generation creatively stifled and alienated from each other. I
| miss the ugly comet cursors, the crummy MIDI tunes, the bad HTML,
| the encouragement to make new friends, and the ability to reach
| people without paying thousands in garbage ads.
|
| I miss dating online without bribing some shitty algorithm. It
| used to be that I could click "browse," find a cute girl's
| profile, say hi, and set up a date within a few days. Modern
| social media is cold and hostile. Stay in your friend group.
| Avoid strangers: They're all scary and bad. Don't trust anyone
| (except for us, the tech company. Give us all your data for
| free.)
|
| The internet used to be bohemian, weird, creative, tacky, and
| friendly. It was my favorite place to be. Where did that joy go?
| What have we become in the last 8 years?
| Aldipower wrote:
| These words are so true. I feel the same way. Nothing to add.
| artursapek wrote:
| Will this actually stay online? I will unironically use this.
| partyguy wrote:
| Yes, I'm planning to keep this online! I'll add more features
| in the coming weeks!
| cjdell wrote:
| Dude this is actually awesome. Do you have a "buy me a beer"
| link so we can help out with hosting costs?
|
| Seriously you should make this the "Wikipedia" of social
| media. No ads ever and people will use it.
|
| By the way, just watched The Social Dilemma on Netflix. The
| world needs people like you!
| mhd wrote:
| A convenient way to funnel people to my Black Cauldron geocities
| fan page.
| throwdour wrote:
| Many creative people got their first public attention on MySpace.
| Soundcloud never quite matched it. Facebook and Twitter are rat
| races.
|
| A re-run of MySpace, at scale, would be a benefit to the world. I
| hope this takes off like a rocket (without losing its spirit.)
| cl0ne wrote:
| Nice work, I made a lot of good friends through the music section
| of the old MySpace and have been working on something similar.
| Facebook, Bandcamp, Soundcloud just aren't the same.
| huntermeyer wrote:
| > Error! You can only send one friend-request every two minutes.
| Please wait a minute and try again.
|
| This is going to slow down adoption.
| bsanr2 wrote:
| I want to join, but this carries over a lot of the same problems
| that modern social media has developed - primarily, insight into
| a heavy portion of my personal data and connections, without any
| assurance that it won't be monetized in an untoward fashion. It
| sucks, but it feels like Facebook et al.'s abuse of their
| position has ruined this kind of centralized social media
| platform forever. Promises aren't enough; it has to be built into
| the platform structure. So I'm wary.
|
| Sidenote: boy, do pages load fast, though. No cruft, I love it.
| hans1729 wrote:
| Hi! I registered and tried to message you, but that feature is
| still being implemented :-)
|
| Curious to see the progression from here on, great job!
| xwdv wrote:
| How is this not copyright infringement?
| monk33 wrote:
| It is
| huntermeyer wrote:
| IANAL but maybe the parody exception would protect them.
|
| Kinda like, Nathan Fielder's "Dumb Starbucks".
|
| Also, is website design even copyrightable?
| crousto wrote:
| This is nice! And reminds me of this other very cool MySpace
| rebuild by artist/hacker Jankenpopp:
|
| https://myspace.windows93.net/
| T3RMINATED wrote:
| Nice!! is this open source
| ffpip wrote:
| So this was what MySpace looked like. I've never seen it before.
| Thanks :)
| logicalmonster wrote:
| Good idea. I think there's a lot of room for some kind of
| internet social network that gives you a space for a custom
| profile, chatting with friends about anything, no algorithms
| dictating what you see, no heavy handed moderation, etc. wish you
| success
| duxup wrote:
| That's what always keeps me away from regular social networks.
|
| It's not my page, it's not my profile, it's just like everyone
| else's....
| pferde wrote:
| We have more than enough of places like that, there's no need
| to create (n+1)th. They all have the same problem - lack of
| adoption, so the network effect is working against them.
| [deleted]
| doublepg23 wrote:
| The Fediverse is creating a space like this. The best case is
| you hosting your own server and being in control of all
| moderation.
| bassrattle wrote:
| I agree. Today, that's a2b2.org. it used to be makeoutclub.com
| jldl805 wrote:
| I live and breathe on the internet and have never been
| moderated once, even freely expressing myself, insulting people
| who deserve it, etc.
|
| My point here is that if you think the current social media
| options have "heavy handed" moderation, you're probably the
| problem, not them.
| rriepe wrote:
| Can anyone understand this sheep's baas?
| sillysaurusx wrote:
| Your assumption is that the moderator is fair. This is often
| not the case.
| javajosh wrote:
| I was recently moderated for the first time in my (fairly
| long) life by a social media site. I complained, and they
| restored it, but it was jarring. My general impression is
| that times they are a'changin' WRT moderation on the
| interwebs.
| skinkestek wrote:
| Try to point out something correct but moderately
| controversial.
|
| I think I've been modded for:
|
| - trying to get people to hate less on Russians
|
| - on the other hand, in the same forum: trying to tell some
| over eager people that no, Russians aren't saints and it
| isn't _all_ NATOs fault.
|
| - pointing out (as an insider that was supposedly one of the
| victims in a major news story recently) that the "facts"
| didn't check out at all.
| logicalmonster wrote:
| Maybe you don't have any out of the box ideas that goes
| against the ideals of corporate America, but I'm certainly
| glad that other people do.
|
| Imagine if current Twitter was around in Galileo's time.
|
| * Independent Fact Checkers have confirmed the consensus that
| the Earth is the center of the Universe, just as God willed
| it.
|
| Or what if George Washington was relying on social media
| during the formation of our country?
|
| * Independent Fact Checkers have confirmed that paying taxes
| to Britain is good and beneficial to the Colonies.
|
| Many good ideas shatter the existing "consensus"
| dramatically. I'm glad that boundaries can and do get pushed
| because that's how we come up with better ideas and systems.
| 762236 wrote:
| You're probably being downvoted for your comment. Does that
| make you the problem?
| idclip wrote:
| Not an SJW here, actually a political minority here ... i see
| a moderate amount of moderation and banning pf groups where i
| hang. Sure its not china but we are not using that asa
| standard ..
|
| and mate thats a ton of shaming in your tone .. please
| consider showing some compassion. I fail to see how his
| comment provoked yours ..
| lovegoblin wrote:
| > SJW
|
| Hah people still use this term unironically?
| kortilla wrote:
| That just means your views are not very controversial (most
| people's aren't).
|
| The argument you're making is just a different face of the "I
| have nothing to hide" in the privacy debates.
| labster wrote:
| I have controversial views (the EM Drive works! Sport is
| the opiate of the masses!) but I seem to get along just
| fine on social media. It's really only the people who have
| boring, discredited political views who have problems.
| rriepe wrote:
| So if I tell my EM drive to leave and come back in six
| months, that's a relativistic bomb, right?
| bmarquez wrote:
| "EM Drive works" is not a controversial view because most
| people have no idea what you're talking about (I had to
| Google it myself).
| alacombe wrote:
| > I have controversial views
|
| This is nowhere controversial.
|
| Try to be a constitutional originalist in the Sillicon
| Valley / tech sites, and we'll continue this
| conversation...
| nindalf wrote:
| > originalist
|
| You mean the folks who think a black person is worth
| 3/5th of a white person? Yeah I imagine they have it
| rough.
| [deleted]
| alacombe wrote:
| You're forgetting a aspect: the Constitutional clause has
| been superseded by the 14th Amendment. So in this case,
| an originalist would rule based on the Amendment, not the
| just Constitution's original text.
|
| And this display a crucial point, there is a legal
| process to amend the Constitution not relying on a few
| scholars re-re-re-interpretation. I'm all for a
| Constitutional Amendment on abortion, as long as it's the
| Will of the People, not the Will of a few jurists. If you
| can get a Constitutional Amendment for the prohibition of
| intoxicating beverages, you can certainly get a
| Constitutional Amendment behind abortion... unless it's
| less of a consensus as you make it seems. Also, using
| one's 14th Amendment Right to privacy to "legalize"
| abortion is a pretty weak argument.
| aerovistae wrote:
| The point is that originalism relies on the idea that the
| Constitution was a nearly flawless document worth
| preserving in its original form with a couple
| adjustments, where in reality it was a deeply, deeply
| flawed document that has been patched repeatedly to a
| workable state but still has serious shortcomings.
| mnouquet wrote:
| That is blatantly false, originalism is relying on both
| the Constitution + associated Constitutional Amendments.
| As OP mentioned, the latter are not set in stone.
| [deleted]
| aerovistae wrote:
| I'm already upset.
| setgree wrote:
| Sidenote: I was in a band in High School that uploaded all its
| music to MySpace in 2006, and our only backups were a few CDs we
| had made; so when MySpace lost all that [0], it was my first,
| most painful lesson about backing up important things multiple
| times.
|
| [0] https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/myspace-
| lost-m...
| franciscop wrote:
| I had recently lost some important data back then so luckily I
| was already backing up data by then! Though now I have kind of
| the opposite problem, I have too much data and it's difficult
| to navigate through it all :)
| CharlesW wrote:
| Have you tried Internet Archive? You might be one of the lucky
| ones.
|
| https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/4/18295014/myspace-lost-song...
| setgree wrote:
| Alas, I have tried, we were not among the lucky.
| clw8 wrote:
| Same with me and my Geocities page from 1997 :(
| UShouldBWorking wrote:
| Nobody lost anything from myspace that they actively didn't
| want. For over a year they announced the change was coming and
| to download and back up you stuff. Even now a lot is still
| backup on archive. Why are people so desperate to play the
| victim all the time?
| polynomial wrote:
| MySpace had all the pieces in place to own the music download
| space, and somehow let iTunes eat their lunch.
|
| I don't know how that happened, but I suspect the new owner was
| pulling profit out of it to support their other flailing
| divisions, rather than let them reinvest to finish their music
| platform.
|
| They literally had all the pieces on the platform side, and it
| was without question the platform of choice for pretty much every
| independent musical artist.
|
| Anyone have the inside story?
| Dangbleed wrote:
| I bet you will get a job too. The same way that Hollywood is
| simply making remakes and people are accepting this as new.
|
| A Nuclear bomb would be nice right about now. Covid was not
| enough humble pie
| bovermyer wrote:
| Jesus dude, who crapped in your Cheerios this morning?
| pcdoodle wrote:
| haha, wish I could see the comment you're responding to.
| hans1729 wrote:
| > I bet you will get a job too. The same way that Hollywood
| is simply making remakes and people are accepting this as
| new. A Nuclear bomb would be nice right about now. Covid
| was not enough humble pie
| pcdoodle wrote:
| Bwahahaha! Thanks xD
| purplecats wrote:
| how did you grab that
| throwamon wrote:
| enable showdead in your profile
| throwamon wrote:
| enable showdead in your profile
| UShouldBWorking wrote:
| Yikes, angry much?
| ecommerceguy wrote:
| I just got an error message about too many people trying to
| create accounts. Keep it going! I'll buy ad space if you never
| sell to big media.
| pcdoodle wrote:
| Same here! We're rooting for you!
| Aeolun wrote:
| Hard to not take those millions/billions. Here's to hoping
| principles weigh more than money.
| 2Gkashmiri wrote:
| How about using that funkwhale with this ? That would be cool.
| Right?
| joshmanders wrote:
| I've been beta testing SpaceHey since I saw An was letting some
| people in and I must say the nostalgia is strong. Love this site
| so much!
| partyguy wrote:
| Thank you for helping me test it!! :D
| fortran77 wrote:
| Is it still vulnerable to the Samy Kamkar worm?
| Minor49er wrote:
| Groups are still in progress. Those were the best part.
| LockAndLol wrote:
| Retro is somehow always in. Things always seem to come back in
| some shape or form.
| Aeolun wrote:
| Oh, cool. I was wondering when a better replacement for Facebook
| would show up.
| ehutch79 wrote:
| Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they
| could, they didn't stop to think if they should.
| furyofantares wrote:
| Maybe weird feedback but the COVID-19 Pandemic section on the
| front page really kills both the retro vibe and the idea that
| this might be something unique rather than yet another way for me
| to consume standard news.
| meekmockmook wrote:
| I'm with you. Lose the covid. Can find it anywhere else.
| pcdoodle wrote:
| I agree, I went to myspace to get away from the hive mind and
| work in my space.
| dvtrn wrote:
| I had-interestingly-the exact opposite response. It kept the
| waves of nostalgia in check by delivering a mild dose of
| modernity to the experience that was subtle enough and works so
| well with the rest of the presentation that I actually caught
| myself smiling and nodding at it.
| furyofantares wrote:
| I think maybe I'd have had the same type of reaction to you
| with a lighter modern news piece. The pandemic or politics
| are both right out, but a clearly-new entertainment piece
| would maybe elicit the same response from me that you've
| described here.
| makeworld wrote:
| I never used MySpace, but this looks cool! Good idea to build off
| the nostalgia. Just on first glance, I noticed you're using URLs
| like https://spacehey.com/profile?id=123 for accessing profiles.
| That seems like a bad idea, using increasing numbers for pages in
| general is not great, because it makes it easy to scrape for
| every user on the site. Why not switch to something like a UUID
| or random base64 code?
| wmij wrote:
| The original myspace used the profile name for URLs -
| https://myspace.com/some_name - maybe the reboot will
| eventually. I tried with mine and it was a 404.
| joshmanders wrote:
| SpaceHey does too, but if you don't set one you get
| profile?id=$int
| wmij wrote:
| Ok, thanks. I set what I thought was a username during
| signup but looks like that was just the name. I see now
| there's a second step going to
| https://spacehey.com/settings and the username URL is
| working for me.
| CharlesW wrote:
| Just curious: Why is this post with kind words and a seemingly-
| helpful tip being downvoted? Is this bad advice for some
| reason?
| meowster wrote:
| Maybe it's because it's advocating for security by obscurity?
| It would probably be more resource-intensive for the server
| if a bot were to scrape every single page to collect UUIDs
| instead of methodically going through them.
| CharlesW wrote:
| Oh, that's interesting -- I hadn't considered that creators
| of web apps might choose to do this to make scraping
| easier. Generally, I've understood that exposing internal
| IDs is undesirable.
|
| [1] https://blog.jiayu.co/2018/09/methods-for-obfuscating-
| sequen... [2]
| https://stackoverflow.com/questions/396164/exposing-
| database...
| Minor49er wrote:
| One way to avoid this is to look for something requesting
| only profile pages, then cut them off after a certain
| number of requests.
| pjc50 wrote:
| All sorts of incidents have happened this way. Somebody
| even got arrested for pointing it out on some government
| website, once.
| bazeblackwood wrote:
| You should definitely tell us how to donate to this effort. Bring
| back the old web!
| pickpuck wrote:
| Nice you can add a <style> tag to your profile!
|
| Please consider making the default colors/fonts CSS variables in
| the :root so that they can be easily overridden for profile page
| styling.
| pcdoodle wrote:
| Thank you so much for making this. I hated how sterile Facebook
| was when it finally took over.
|
| Are these pages going to index in google? I used to find lots of
| "friends" by searching site:myspace.com female statename
| interestname
| meekmockmook wrote:
| I did this too. God, dating online used to be so much fun!
| tylerchilds wrote:
| Super cool! Are you considering federation a la ActivityPub et
| al?
|
| Just thinking of a way for you to really stunt with what MySpace
| could have been that Facebook or Twitter would never do.
| zdkl wrote:
| And even if federation is too big of a feature, maybe using the
| ActivityStreams format for user interactions could be
| beneficial.
|
| https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/
| superkuh wrote:
| And if activitystreams are still too bloated you can look
| into microformats2 and webmentions (indieweb).
| varbhat wrote:
| Website looks very very good and loads very fast imo. Just usable
| without fancy bells. I like this design.
| partyguy wrote:
| Thank you :)
| mrzool wrote:
| I'm absolutely blown away by the speed of this website. Facebook
| and Twitter are a bloated heavy mess in comparison.
|
| I just registered for an account and I'm getting super nostalgic.
| Really well done!
|
| Edit: here's my profile in case someone wants to add me :)
|
| https://spacehey.com/mrzool
| partyguy wrote:
| thank you :)
| dt3ft wrote:
| Aaand here is why we can't have nice things:
|
| > Someone is currently trying to register hundreds of accounts
| with fake email addresses per second. I'm trying to prevent that
| so in the meantime you can't sign up on http://SpaceHey.com -
| sorry.
| meowster wrote:
| Darn, I'm user number 300-something, and my real first name is
| already taken as someone else's username.
| [deleted]
| simplecto wrote:
| I sense a renaissance coming
| eezurr wrote:
| I really hope this takes off! A human curated/self exploring site
| is a dream. I miss the myspace days when you could search by
| location, genre, and sort the data in various ways. I discovered
| so much music on my own, it was always an exciting adventure.
| alberth wrote:
| Tom
|
| Don't forgot to have Tom be your default first friend.
|
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Anderson
| NetBeck wrote:
| "but most of all, samy is my hero"[1]
|
| [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samy_(computer_worm)
| xyst wrote:
| tom's looking a bit rough around the edges nowadays
| meowster wrote:
| It's tough work to spend half a billion dollars.
| mooreed wrote:
| This was my first thought too.
| joshmanders wrote:
| An (partyguy) and spacehey's official account are your friends
| when you join, just like Tom was.
| sitzkrieg wrote:
| no whiteboard tho :(
| mrits wrote:
| If you built a web app in ASP.NET 1.x it would actually look a
| lot like this without much modification.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2020-11-29 23:00 UTC)