[HN Gopher] The new 'gold rush' for green lithium
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The new 'gold rush' for green lithium
        
       Author : clouddrover
       Score  : 62 points
       Date   : 2020-11-29 08:22 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
        
       | forgotmypw17 wrote:
       | this page is unreadable on android, the text is positioned off-
       | screen
        
         | Solocomplex wrote:
         | Page 404s with my old client (Materialistic)
        
       | saiya-jin wrote:
       | Whatever keeps them from mining Salar de Uyuni in Bolivia, one of
       | nature's magic places. Wikipedia says it contains 50-70% of world
       | reserves, and I can't imagine mining wouldn't destroy it
       | completely over time.
       | 
       | I truly wish Bolivia to raise itself from poverty, but ideally
       | without the destruction of its magical wonders. Damn I miss
       | traveling...
        
         | naringas wrote:
         | I am pretty sure that evo morales was quickly kicked out of
         | there because he wasn't gonna easily let global corporations
         | mine in a "cost efficient" way. so now that he's out is only a
         | matter of time before there's cheaper lithium in the global
         | market.
        
           | simlevesque wrote:
           | Elon Musk said that he'd coup whoever he wants in order to
           | get lithium... there is a lot at stake.
        
             | thebradbain wrote:
             | If it sounds like hyperbole, it's not -- Elon did verbatim
             | tweet (and then delete) this:
             | https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.truthorfiction.com/did-
             | elon...
             | 
             | Maybe it was an attempt at a joke, but considering he's one
             | of the richest men in the world who has a _vested_ interest
             | in lithium, and considering there _was_ a Bolivian, quasi-
             | US-backed coup just this past year for reasons which at
             | least partially include these lithium deposits, it's not at
             | all funny to joke about.
        
         | grecy wrote:
         | Agree 100%. I spent a week driving across the Salar and the
         | surrounding desert in 2010 [1], it was one of the most wild and
         | unforgettable experiences of my life.
         | 
         | All around the world places have parallels or similarities.
         | Patagonia reminds me of Alaska. The Sahara is a bit like the
         | Simpson, white sand beaches in Northern Australia are similar
         | to those in Thailand or the Bahamas.
         | 
         | Not so with Bolvia. I've _never_ seen anything on the planet
         | remotely like the high Altiplano around the Salar and the
         | entire South Western part of Bolivia. It 's utterly
         | breathtaking and unique.
         | 
         | [1] http://theroadchoseme.com/the-uyuni-salt-flats-to-chile-1
        
           | tspike wrote:
           | How would you compare it with the Bonneville Salt Flats in
           | Utah?
        
         | trianglem wrote:
         | >50-70%
         | 
         | That's incredible. I presume this is because no one has been
         | looking for large reserves of lithium until recently.
        
         | HPsquared wrote:
         | I don't think it would be possible to destroy a 10,000 sq km
         | salt flat if that was even the intention.
        
           | hu3 wrote:
           | A total of 11,088 sq km (4,281 sq miles) of rainforest were
           | destroyed from August 2019 to July 2020 in Brazil.
           | 
           | https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-55130304
        
           | RC_ITR wrote:
           | Never underestimate the ability of unchecked human
           | industriousness to turn an unimaginably large resource into a
           | rapidly dwindling one.
        
         | bobthepanda wrote:
         | Didn't some country offer to not mine their beautiful area if
         | they were paid by Western countries an equivalent amount, but
         | no one was willing to put their money where their mouth was?
        
           | markdown wrote:
           | I don't know about that, but Norway is paying to save
           | rainforests:
           | 
           | $1B to Brazil: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-
           | climatechange-amazon-norw...
           | 
           | $150M to Gabon: https://qz.com/africa/1714104/gabon-to-
           | get-150-million-from-...
           | 
           | Indonesia: https://news.mongabay.com/2020/05/indonesia-
           | norway-redd-paym...
           | 
           | Guyana: https://news.mongabay.com/2009/02/norway-to-pay-
           | guyana-to-sa...
        
           | cheschire wrote:
           | Isn't that the actual definition of extortion? That sounds
           | like threatening something of value to the whole world for
           | personal gain.
           | 
           | edit: clarity.
        
             | john_minsk wrote:
             | Nope. This is capitalism. If you want something to happen -
             | pay for it...
        
               | toiletfuneral wrote:
               | hell yeah lets destroy natural beauty permanently for the
               | immediate gain of a few people, capitalism rules and
               | there are no other options
        
             | scythe wrote:
             | No, extortion is when you threaten to hurt someone _else_
             | for money. Threatening to hurt _yourself_ for money is
             | called, I think, livestreaming.
        
               | cheschire wrote:
               | Funny comment, but the first part is what I'm driving at.
               | 
               | Does damaging a world heritage site constitute hurting
               | someone _else_ or does it constitute only self harm
               | because it 's within sovereign borders?
        
               | WJW wrote:
               | Elements of both: by their nature world heritage sites
               | are deemed of value to everyone and demolishing it would
               | (mildly) hurt everyone. On the other hand: on the
               | international level there is a treaty that legally
               | protects world heritage sites but it carries no penalties
               | if a state neglects to do so and UNESCO does not have any
               | means to force a sovereign state to perform or cease any
               | action.
               | 
               | So unless you can somehow move the worlds' nations to
               | enact sanctions or invade, each state is free to mine
               | what they want.
        
               | [deleted]
        
           | ianai wrote:
           | Going there, I wonder whether there's any nearby to earth
           | rocks with large amounts of lithium. That could be a
           | potential big thing for space industry.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-11-30 23:00 UTC)