[HN Gopher] The Gernsback Continuum by William Gibson (1981)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Gernsback Continuum by William Gibson (1981)
        
       Author : pmoriarty
       Score  : 73 points
       Date   : 2020-11-30 16:34 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (web.archive.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (web.archive.org)
        
       | steve_gh wrote:
       | A brilliant bit of writing. My favourite WG short story
        
       | lasagnaphil wrote:
       | This reminds me of the concept of hauntology [1] [2] - the return
       | of elements of the past as symbolic ghosts, haunting our current
       | world. It's strange since this concept was introduced in
       | philosophy by Derrida in the 90s, and further studied by cultural
       | theorists such as Simon Reynolds and Mark Fisher - but Gibson
       | seems to nail this phenomenon in his short story a decade
       | earlier.
       | 
       | And this phenomenon is perhaps most exacerbated today, as we are
       | experiencing a gradual but terminal decline of former capitalist
       | empires, but nobody can imagine a new revolutionary path out (as
       | Mark Fisher would say, "the slow cancellation of the future")
       | Ghostly ideologies from the past (communism, fascism) are quickly
       | recycled on the Internet for their nostalgic sign value, but as
       | it is quickly consumed and commoditized it fails to offer a
       | solution for the problems of our current world. And more people
       | are listening to music [3] that admittedly makes them feel
       | "nostalgic for a past that does not exist".
       | 
       | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hauntology [2]
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hauntology_(music) [3]
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporwave
        
         | Stierlitz wrote:
         | @lasagnaphil ..
         | 
         | Some very interesting points there. I wonder the reason for
         | down-voting the text into a faded shade of grey?
        
           | lasagnaphil wrote:
           | Ah, thank you for the unfading. Sometimes comments that seem
           | to be vaguely political gets downvoted kinda fast in this
           | site. But nevertheless, I was just trying to connect the
           | theme of this short story to a well-known phenomenon of
           | "retrograde nostalgia" that is not just a symptom of
           | political right but also to the political left. In that
           | regard I view Gibson and this story as quite a visionary,
           | predicting the cultural sentiments that would define the
           | neoliberal era, before Derrida and Fisher.
           | 
           | And also, there are many literature papers on the connection
           | between the Gernsback Continuum and hauntology on the
           | Internet - I've read a good piece before but the PDF link is
           | kinda broken at the moment and cannot find it anymore.
        
             | pessimizer wrote:
             | I bet there's almost as many who would reflexively downvote
             | a mention of Derrida as who downvote lefty politics:)
        
       | pavlov wrote:
       | _> "The Thirties had seen the first generation of American
       | industrial designers; until the Thirties, all pencil sharpeners
       | had looked like pencil sharpeners--your basic Victorian
       | mechanism, perhaps with a curlicue of decorative trim. After the
       | advent of the designers, some pencil sharpeners looked as though
       | they'd been put together in wind tunnels."_
       | 
       | A leading figure of this design movement was French-born Raymond
       | Loewy:
       | 
       | https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/meet-product-desig...
       | 
       | Gibson writes that "most successful American designers had been
       | recruited from the ranks of Broadway theater designers", but this
       | is not the case with Loewy.
       | 
       | He had an interesting life and career, and his autobiography
       | "Never Leave Well Enough Alone" is a great read. Sadly it seems
       | to be out of print in English.
        
       | egypturnash wrote:
       | When this came out, it was a repudiation of the caricatured
       | ideals of the early SF of the 1930s - stuff that was fifty-one
       | years old at the time. This was the dream of the future everyone
       | had, once.
       | 
       | This story is thirty-nine years old now. Gibson's _Neuromancer_
       | is only three years younger, and it feels as laughably innocent
       | to our future-dwelling eyes as anything he was making fun of in
       | this story.
       | 
       | Time makes fools of us all.
        
         | hardwaregeek wrote:
         | It's particularly funny seeing how enamored Gibson was with
         | Japan. Very much an artifact of the 80's. Even though, truth be
         | told, he's never been that good at writing Asian characters. I
         | love his work but dammit for someone who stole so much from
         | Asian aesthetic, he always relegates his Asian characters to
         | stereotypes or the weak and ineffectual^[1].
         | 
         | That said, I think the bones of Neuromancer could make a great
         | modern story. Particularly the concept of the Tessier-Ashpools
         | being these incestuous, almost pseudo-deities due to their
         | wealth. The wasps' nest metaphor and all. I'd also love to see
         | Wintermute/Neuromancer connected with surveillance capitalism
         | and our mass collecting of data.
         | 
         | [1]: I haven't read all of Gibson's novels so please correct me
         | if there's a novel out there with better Asian characters.
        
           | csours wrote:
           | I've just re-read Jurassic Park and I'm reminded of
           | Crichton's portrayal of Japanese characters as well. The rise
           | of Japan in the 80s was certainly on a lot of people's minds.
        
             | fl0wenol wrote:
             | I mean, he literally followed it up with Rising Sun.
        
           | FooBarBizBazz wrote:
           | Gibson's schtick was always to trade on stereotypes.
           | Charitably, his books were "idea novels" about social forces.
           | None of his characters were ever human.
        
             | Neputys wrote:
             | I like your to the point dryness. A bit cynical, but to the
             | point. What would you say was the reason for him being so
             | popular then? This is a normal question. I agree with what
             | you wrote.
        
             | pessimizer wrote:
             | I think that's ideal for works that are primarily about the
             | environment that characters inhabit. If the characters or
             | also fluid and deep it's difficult to understand how the
             | environment is affecting them. Since you know how those
             | stereotypes would react in the contemporary environment, a
             | lot of the interest in science fiction is to examine the
             | contrast in behavior between now and this future.
        
             | pmoriarty wrote:
             | Gibson's novels are full of stereotypes, particularly ones
             | that seem like they stepped out of a Noir or hardboiled
             | detective novel, such as his assassins, mercenaries,
             | corporate execs, crime bosses, and an assortment of street
             | life. But it's too harsh to say _every_ character is a
             | stereotype or that _none_ of his characters were ever
             | human.
             | 
             | Take one of the protagonists of _Count Zero_ , Marly
             | Krushkhova, _" the disgraced former operator of a tiny
             | Paris gallery"_, who hunts down the maker of the Joseph
             | Cornell-like boxes. She's completely human, and I can't
             | think of any stereotype she would fit in to.
        
         | varjag wrote:
         | I dunno, it was grim then and it still is. We did end up in
         | substantially better future, all things considered.
        
           | Apocryphon wrote:
           | '80s cyberpunk is still grim, but I think what they failed to
           | capture is the dissonant tone of our modern dystopia. Classic
           | cyberpunk was all dark sprawling streets and neon-lit seedy
           | underbellies, led by shadowy faceless corporate execs of
           | austere zaibatsu.
           | 
           | Whereas the malefactors of great wealth in our present did
           | not forget the average consumer and instead manipulates our
           | emotions with cutting-edge marketing, algorithmic analysis of
           | our deepest desires, and use of primary colors and comfy
           | fonts. The copy is nonthreatening or hip language. The
           | reality is grim, but the appearance isn't. More _Brave New
           | World_ and less _1984_. More Disney, filtered through Banksy.
           | 
           | I think most Gibson cyberpunk failed to capture the banality
           | of the future, because they were fixated on the romantic
           | cowboy-gangster hackers outlaws who lived on the fringes.
           | Among the big names, Neal Stephenson did a great job of it
           | with _Snow Crash_ and _The Diamond Age_ because he remembered
           | that the megacorps had to sell to someone at the end of the
           | day, and had to have shiny customer-facing dross.
        
             | mortenjorck wrote:
             | _> I think most Gibson cyberpunk failed to capture the
             | banality of the future, because they were fixated on the
             | romantic cowboy-gangster hackers outlaws who lived on the
             | fringes._
             | 
             | This is both an excellent encapsulation of where cyberpunk
             | missed the mark, _and_ why its appeal is so enduring today.
             | 
             | The real-life cyberpunks of the 2020s aren't staging
             | dramatic data heists or getting in firefights with
             | megacorp-employed super-soldiers; they're selling fake
             | social media accounts for pennies or hanging phones in
             | trees to game Amazon's gig delivery system. Gibson was
             | right on the money that "the street finds its own uses" for
             | technology; his mistake was underestimating just how
             | pedestrian both the tech and those uses would be.
             | 
             | In its original milieu, cyberpunk was an escape from the
             | technological unknown. Today, its' an escape from the
             | technological all-too-well-known.
        
             | pmoriarty wrote:
             | _" what they failed to capture is the dissonant tone of our
             | modern dystopia"_
             | 
             | I just reread _Neuromancer_ and _Count Zero_ , and the main
             | thing I was struck by that Gibson didn't predict was
             | today's omnipresent surveillance.
             | 
             | The people in his novels don't voluntarily carry around
             | tracking devices and recoring devices. What they read and
             | watch isn't tracked, and neither are their preferences or
             | the opinions they express. They tend to have much more
             | privacy than most people do today.
             | 
             | In this respect, I find today's society closer to _1984_
             | than to _Brave New World_. It 's _1984_ , complete with
             | _Newspeak_ , _doublethink_ and _Two Minutes of Hate_ for
             | the boogeyman of the day, telescreens that combine
             | televisions with security cameras and microphones what
             | monitor what you do.
             | 
             | It's interesting that Gibson chose not to incorporate such
             | dystopian themes in his books, and opted for what is in
             | many ways a more optimistic dystopia.
        
               | Apocryphon wrote:
               | You make a good point about surveillance, but I'd argue
               | it's still more _Brave New World_ , a dystopia built on
               | consumerism, hedonism, and the compliance of the
               | willingly oppressed over _1984_ 's brutal, spartan, war
               | economy. The citizens of Oceania may choose to buy into
               | propaganda and nationalism, but they're also forced to by
               | an all-powerful police state. The inhabitants of Huxley's
               | World State certainly are subject to an oppressive state
               | and brainwashing, but they also do so under far more
               | comfortable circumstances. _1984_ is motivated by pain,
               | _Brave New World_ is motivated by pleasure- I 'd consider
               | the latter to be closer to modern consumerist society.
               | 
               | I would assume Gibson simply didn't consider the
               | technological ramifications of ubiquitous surveillance,
               | or it's just his setup of a decentralized oppressive
               | world of feuding megacorps and criminal super-gangs would
               | have less thematic use for it than _1984_ 's setup of one
               | (or three) totalitarian governments able to monitor
               | everyone.
        
               | pessimizer wrote:
               | That perspective is a bit Eloi; plenty of people are not
               | doing well.
        
               | Apocryphon wrote:
               | It isn't; a society can be dominated by emphasizing
               | values of consumer-driven hedonism or social jockeying
               | within castes (as in Brave New World) over totalitarian
               | war and hatred (as in 1984), and still fall short of its
               | aspirations.
        
               | at_a_remove wrote:
               | Why not .. _all of the above_?
               | 
               | If this sort of thing scratches an itch you have, try
               | Lawrence Sander's _The Tomorrow File_ , from 1975. The
               | author rather gleefully throws as many dystopian tropes
               | into the mix as is feasible (and then a few more for good
               | measure), and makes it work, oddly enough.
        
               | ajxs wrote:
               | I had the same thought regarding surveillance. At the
               | risk of sounding like devil's advocate, had Gibson
               | accurately predicted the high-tech panopticon of the
               | modern day, he could create a much better thematic
               | environment by ignoring or downplaying it. Much of the
               | "high-tech, low-life" that characterises the sprawl would
               | become near-impossible in the high-surveillance climate
               | of a country like modern China. I feel like you'd have to
               | expend so much literary energy constantly explaining how
               | they shake the basic, ubiquitous surveillance we're used
               | to,'excusing' the characters from overexposure. Then
               | again, explaining the mechanics of anti-surveillance
               | might provide the kind of cyberpunk brain food that we
               | all love.
               | 
               | That being said, there's plenty of ubiquitous
               | surveillance happening in the Sprawl Trilogy. Marly's
               | pursuit by Virek in Count Zero springs to mind here.
        
               | Pamar wrote:
               | I think he missed wifi/cell phones, mostly. Had he
               | thought of that, he would probably have explored these
               | themes a bit more.
               | 
               | In Neuromancer there is an episode (second half, when
               | they have already moved away from Earth surface) where a
               | character is targeted by a sort of drone/service droid.
               | 
               | But I also sorta remember that in a subsequent story (I
               | think it was Count Zero? Not sure anymore) one of the
               | characters... cuts a videocall or something similar by
               | actually yanking the cord out of the wall.
        
             | UnpossibleJim wrote:
             | It was easy to learn from the failures and successes
             | predicted in dystopian scifi. Take the Brave New World
             | dystopian marketing and mix it with a touch of societal
             | enforced wrong speak and lack of education from 1984, with
             | the genetic manipulation and corporate domination and
             | rampant manipulation from cyberpunk noir, voila! You have
             | the perfect cocktail of a zombified workforce in a neo
             | gentrification with an underclass that thinks they're
             | educated, when they are really craftsmen to maintain
             | software, power grids, electronics, consumerism and
             | surveilance. (sorry... I didn't mean to get so dark)
        
             | tachyonbeam wrote:
             | IMO cyberpunk was maybe just too early. I think brain
             | implants, gene editing, AI and other technologies are going
             | to happen, and these technologies will redefine what it
             | means to be human. We will be at risk of losing our
             | humanity, of losing meaning, just as cyberpunk predicted.
             | It's just... It's already been 40 years since cyberpunk
             | started, and it might be another 40 years until those
             | technological and human challenges really materialize. In
             | the meantime, other important societal challenges are
             | surfacing due to increased computerization and networking.
        
               | segfaultbuserr wrote:
               | > _IMO cyberpunk was maybe just too early. I think brain
               | implants, gene editing, AI and other technologies are
               | going to happen_
               | 
               | I had a discussion with someone - "if the 21th century is
               | the century of biotech" (the cliche in the Silicon Valley
               | since the late 90s) is true, why are we seeing little
               | progress? My reply was: perhaps biotech history will be
               | similar to electronics history, and it's just too early
               | for now. Spark-gap transmitters were put into service in
               | the 1900 and started the electronic age. In the
               | 1910-1920, vacuum tubes were invented (the entire radio
               | industry started before we even had an RF amplifier). In
               | the 1940s, the first generation of electronic computers
               | came into existence. Transistors were invented in the
               | 1950s and practical ones didn't exist until the 1960s.
               | VLSI started in the early 70s, and it's only in the 1980
               | that the microcomputer revolution was finally here.
               | 
               | Although Moore's Law arguably is much older than VLSI,
               | but it still took 40 years before the new science of
               | electronics invented the computers, and another 40 years
               | before VLSI's exponential growth. Thus, I wonder, is the
               | Human Genome Project the spark-gap transmitters of our
               | era? Then CRISPR-Cas9 is the vacuum tube? And today we
               | see a Hacker News headline _" AlphaFold: a solution to a
               | 50-year-old grand challenge in biology"_ [0], a
               | breakthrough of protein folding using deep learning.
               | Well, we are probably reaching the biotech equivalent of
               | electromechanical computers right now. This "electronics-
               | biotech" analogy seems right, if it's the case, brain-
               | computer interface will be invented in the 2070s, like
               | 1970s VLSI.
               | 
               | On the other hand, classic cyberpunk is always about the
               | near-future. Its plots were usually based on a quick
               | interpolation of the extreme growth of computing power we
               | were seeing in the 80s, combined with the caricature of
               | post-capitalism, it is only from this assumption that
               | leads to radical social changes. If the story took place
               | in the 22th century instead of 40 years later, it would
               | be very "uncyberpunk". Cyberpunk's predictions has failed
               | to materialize from this perspective. But it may still
               | have a chance - if the singularitarianism are correct,
               | the singularity will be there by 2050...
               | 
               | [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25253488
        
           | helios_invictus wrote:
           | Did we?
        
             | varjag wrote:
             | I mean, one major character there is a World War 3 veteran
             | who had been turned into a computer drone.
        
             | segfaultbuserr wrote:
             | Cyberpunk is already here, it's just not very evenly
             | distributed, yet.
        
             | bigbubba wrote:
             | Unless you figure you'd be privileged enough to live in
             | Freeside, I'd say so.
        
               | jerf wrote:
               | I'd say give us another 5-20 years before saying we
               | dodged it.
        
         | pmoriarty wrote:
         | _" This was the dream of the future everyone had, once."_
         | 
         | In a 2014 interview[1], William Gibson said:
         | 
         |  _" It hasn't ever really been a monolithic thing. The gleaming
         | kitchens and the monorail and the flying cars, and all of that,
         | in the 1950's coexisted with a strain of left-leaning American
         | sociopolitically aware prose science fiction, which was being
         | published in contrast to its political opposite -- the
         | political opposite was called _Astounding Stories _and the
         | liberal scifi magazine was called_ Galaxy _, and the writers..
         | there was a little bit of crossover and they would drink
         | together when they went to science fiction conventions but
         | otherwise they didn 't have much to do with one another."_
         | 
         |  _" If you look at the stories that were being published in
         | _Galaxy _, they were quite dystopian and grittier and more
         | naturalistic, and to my mind altogether more intelligent, but
         | that 's sort of a matter of taste, so it's never all one
         | scenario, though we tend to remember it that way."_
         | 
         | [1] - at around 18 minutes in to
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dlvle5YBv4
        
         | Neputys wrote:
         | You are right on the money in a way. Neuromancer was the dream
         | of the future everyone had, once. But it's just a "what" a
         | manipulation if you will. Gernsback Continuum shows the depth
         | of his insight it's a "why" and "how" something way more
         | timeless. No surprise it becomes more relevant than his other
         | work as time goes by. It's kind of sad, to me at least it shows
         | he could have written something way more serious but chose fame
         | and glory during his lifetime instead of shot at immortality so
         | to speak. Really really effing sad...
        
       | tannerbrockwell wrote:
       | In the same vein, the possibilities of the Sonora Aero Club:
       | 
       | "One hundred years later, a house in Houston, Texas, caught on
       | fire. In the aftermath, a fire inspector instructed the family to
       | get rid of some of the old, miraculously unscathed junk in the
       | attic. The family complied, and everything was soon landfill-
       | bound.
       | 
       | Among that debris: the 12 illustrated scrapbooks of one Charles
       | August Albert Dellschau, German immigrant, supposed former Sonora
       | Aero Club member. Created between 1908 and 1921, during
       | Dellschau's retirement, the pages document his recollections of
       | the machines, meetings, and men of the erstwhile Club."[1]
       | 
       | [1]:
       | https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/03/charl...
        
         | Apocryphon wrote:
         | Or like a particular Texas gun club, in _Planetary_.
         | 
         | https://artbyarion.blogspot.com/2017/07/planetary-18-warren-...
        
         | karaterobot wrote:
         | Thanks for the link, that was interesting!
        
       | jgon wrote:
       | It was turned into a pretty good short film as well if anyone is
       | interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xh5QHtGmXn4
        
         | robocat wrote:
         | Interesting - starts at 0:55 if you want to skip classification
         | etc.
         | 
         | Very appropriate given this para in the story: "There's a
         | British obsession with the more baroque elements of American
         | pop culture, something like the weird cowboys-and-Indians
         | fetish of the West Germans or the aberrant French hunger for
         | old Jerry Lewis films. In Dialta Downes this manifested itself
         | in a mania for a uniquely American form of architecture that
         | most Americans are scarcely aware of. At first I wasn't sure
         | what she was talking about, but gradually it began to dawn on
         | me. I found myself remembering Sunday morning television in the
         | Fifties."
        
       | ghaff wrote:
       | Although Gibson's Sprawl stories and novels are probably better
       | known, this is actually my favorite Gibson short.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-11-30 23:00 UTC)