[HN Gopher] Amazon buys 11 Boeing 767s to expand its cargo fleet ___________________________________________________________________ Amazon buys 11 Boeing 767s to expand its cargo fleet Author : seryoiupfurds Score : 48 points Date : 2021-01-05 19:49 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.cbc.ca) (TXT) w3m dump (www.cbc.ca) | recursion wrote: | The sheer size of Amazon is mind boggling. Is there anywhere | they've opened their logistics network to other operators yet? | Like AWS but for their logistics. | tidepod12 wrote: | Isn't "logistics as a service" pretty much what Fulfillment By | Amazon is? | | I could be totally wrong, but based on the past stories I've | read about Amazon's negotiations with UPS and their growth of | their own delivery network, I'd be surprised if they have much | spare logistics capacity to open up to anyone outside the | immediate Amazon ecosystem. | discodave wrote: | > Isn't "logistics as a service" pretty much what Fulfillment | By Amazon is? | | There is a lot of crossover between FBA, and a UPS or FedEx, | but it's not 100%. FBA is basically B2C, as opposed to B2B or | C2C. | | Back during the "peak lockdown" of April/May 2020, a little | birdie told me about some of the steps that Amazon was taking | to give the warehouses and delivery network a break from the | increased demand. In other words, Amazon saw lots of | unexpected growth due to the pandemic. It wouldn't surprise | me if plans to launch "Amazon Logistics" or whatever as a | separate line of business got pushed back due to the | pandemic. | | Edit: I know for a fact that the leadership of the Logistics | part of Amazon has expressed a desire to become the "4th | flywheel" of Amazon, which is Amazon-speak for being a self | sustaining, revenue generating line of business. But as you | allude to, they have to soak up all the demand generated from | the Amazon consumer business first. | ballarak wrote: | Look up "Multi-channel Fulfillment", Amazon ships off-Amazon | orders for 3rd party sellers. | LennyWhiteJr wrote: | May want to check out https://freight.amazon.com | notatoad wrote: | per wikipedia, it looks like amazon's current fleet is 66 | aircraft, and prior to this news had already ordered 15 | additional 767-300ER. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Air | tidepod12 wrote: | Of note, all of those 66 planes are leased from and operated by | other cargo airlines, like Atlas Air. Amazon doesn't own the | planes or employ the pilots, they just lease the ability to | paint the Amazon logo on the side and have the planes fly | routes they choose. | | It's unclear if the planes mentioned in the OP are talking | about Amazon actually outright purchasing planes (which would | be a first) or if they are just leasing more. | | edit: Actually the article does say this at the bottom: | | >Amazon launched its own air cargo fleet in 2016 and, prior to | Tuesday's news, the company leased 80 planes, but the move is | the first time the company has bought their own | lordnacho wrote: | What's the point of painting the planes in your own colors? | cosmodisk wrote: | The same as putting your name on a skyscraper. Whenever you | are over a city or landing with your private jet, you can | always tell the guy sitting in front of you: oh,look, there | they are! Remember I told you I bought 12 new Boeings? | notatoad wrote: | It impresses the other billionaires. | petra wrote: | Playing the stock market game. | jandrese wrote: | I wonder if this means they'll be hiring their own pilots? Or | are they buying the aircraft and then leasing them out to an | air freight company to handle the operations? Basically the | same situation but better for Amazon's taxes. | jaywalk wrote: | They'll almost certainly have another company handling | operations and maintenance. | granzymes wrote: | Bloomberg confirmed that the purchased planes will be | operated by contractors. | | https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-05/amazon- | ma... | [deleted] | tschwimmer wrote: | As the other poster noted, these are the first outright | purchases of planes, vs previous planes were leased from | aircraft leasing companies. My understanding is that when you | lease, the leasing company handles all the maintenance and | crewing and you only specify the routings. Obviously when you | buy planes, you're responsible for everything yourself. You can | however contract out maintenance and crewing to other | contractors. | jonwadsworth wrote: | Will Amazon start to transport other things; in addition to goods | they are selling? Human transport? Compete directly with | UPS/FedEx? | fumar wrote: | Do customers gain from Amazon's increased footprint? They are | like a super organism growing and controlling distribution paths. | Have there been other companies like Amazon in capitalist | history? Google? | jfim wrote: | Probably this one, over four hundred years ago: | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_East_India_Company | kd913 wrote: | I remember watching a video from Wendover Production talking | about the decline of 747 and A380s mainly due to a lack of | guaranteed passengers to fill the plane routes in both | directions. | | Exceptions being some airlines which are able to operate hub and | spoke models and where fuel is cheap like the middle east | airlines. | | Wouldn't these types of planes be more suitable for a role in | logistics which can benefit the greater density of packing? | | I am guessing this is something to do with fuel savings, and new | composite materials meaning that smaller planes are still more | efficient. However, would that necessarily apply to recent | 747s/a380s which I think have composite materials and can be | retrofitted to efficient engines? I figure these specific planes | must be on sale as they are withdrawn from service so I am | curious about the use of 767s here. | nickff wrote: | The A340, A380, 727, 747, and L-1011 existed because of the | hub-and-spoke model, and the requirement for a minimum of three | engines for transoceanic flights. The 777 was the harbinger of | their doom, as it brought ETOPS with it. | | Somewhat tangentially, there is a (strong) argument that twin- | engine aircraft are actually safer than three or four engine | aircraft. First, they are at lower risk of having an engine | problem (as they have fewer engines). Second, the requirements | all focus on having sufficient performance with a single engine | out, which means that a twin engine aircraft normally has at | least 200% of the power required to keep it aloft, whereas the | four-engine aircraft only has 133% of what it needs. Given that | many problems can be solved with a sufficient application of | power, the twin-engine airplane is actually at an advantage! | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ETOPS | jrockway wrote: | What is interesting to me is that having 200% power onboard | is more cost efficient than only having 133% power onboard. | Theodores wrote: | The 767s are twin engine and more efficient than the 747. | | The A380 never was a cargo plane, big that it is. It also has | the four engines with the added maintenance. | xvf22 wrote: | Cargo companies seem to have older fleets and the 767s are | being displaced from passenger service and have a cargo | conversation option. The a380 doesn't have a cargo conversation | option as far as I've seen. Plenty of old 747s are in service | for cargo flights. Kalitta air has a bunch of older 747s and | Atlas has a sizable fleet including some 8Fs. | formercoder wrote: | Pretty sure I've read there will never be a cargo a380 | because its max takeoff weight is low compared to its volume. | csours wrote: | I think cause and effect may be chasing each other here. | You're not wrong, but also the A380 was not designed to | have a high takeoff weight because they never intended it | to carry cargo, so it will never carry cargo because it has | a low takeoff weight compared to its volume. | | It was a design decision to be a people mover. [0] | | 0: https://www.flexport.com/blog/airbus-a380-no-cargo- | equivalen... | simonh wrote: | This reminds me of when Ryanair bought 100 Boeing 737-800 | aircraft in 2002 after 9/11 hammered the airline industry[0], a | very bold forward looking move. It was good for Ryanair and for | Boeing. | | [0] | https://www.theguardian.com/business/2002/jan/24/theairlinei... | nixass wrote: | Right now Ryanair has almost 200 737-800MAX on order, | significant amount of these were added during MAX grounding as | the prices went down a lot. Bold looking move again, but still | shitiest airliner out there | W-Stool wrote: | If UPS is not looking over their shoulder, they should be. | moltar wrote: | I predicted in October of 2018 [1], that in 3 years Amazon will | start flying freight directly from China to US fulfillment | centers and cut out the middlemen (FBA sellers). Since then | Amazon has been on-boarding sellers in China at a rapid pace. | | - [1] https://www.scaleleap.com/zine/just-in-time-air/ | grogenaut wrote: | To me in 2014 it was really dumb that Chinese sellers were | using USA middlemen to get on Amazon instead of just directly | selling on Amazon. In general it seems dumb that any | manufacturer isn't just selling direct to consumer if they have | a consumer finished product on Amazon. | | However one insight into the reason is embedded in this | anecdote: My friend was asked by a Chinese supplier to sell a | thing on Amazon. But the seller then went on to try and | transfer all of the inventory risk, and customer support risk | to my friend. They then also refused to give a unique license | to the product for Amazon to my friend and also undercut their | offer to my friend with another random person in the USA. 6 | months later the supplier listed V2 themselves on Amazon once | the first person had built them a market and they could copy | pasta all the english product info. Seller was left half their | V1 inventory and had to sell at a loss to clear it. | | Luckily my friend only burned the Amazon seller fee during the | trial period and their time. | Mountain_Skies wrote: | It's difficult to really get a grasp on Amazon's size but it was | a bit eye opening the other day when I was driving down a rural | road up in the mountains and passed by an Amazon delivery van. I | would have assumed for such a remote location that they'd turn | their packages over to the post office to deliver but apparently | their delivery service is large enough now to service even the | very rural areas. | [deleted] | echelon wrote: | You're probably overlooking the Amazon distribution center that | isn't far away. | cosmodisk wrote: | Here in the UK, Amazon dumped some of the largest last mile | logistics companies and rolled out their own fleet of delivery | vans. | vmchale wrote: | Makes sense, they're getting good deals rn with the way airlines | are doing. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-01-05 23:00 UTC)