[HN Gopher] OpenSocial Specification ___________________________________________________________________ OpenSocial Specification Author : ecliptik Score : 44 points Date : 2021-01-11 18:16 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (github.com) (TXT) w3m dump (github.com) | rektide wrote: | this was such an exciting time. there was such hope for | distributed, secure social protocols. for interoperability, | intertwingularity. we'd seen rss become powerful & loved, | innovation like Wave (totally excellent off the wall great leaps | & bounds), Buzz, & others seed the idea that more was possible, | that we could expand how sites & users worked together across the | web in a secure fashion. | | OpenSocial was to be totally next level modular web. being able | to build composite sites, sites built of tech from all over. we | could enhance our experience on a site in ways that no site | operator had pre-determined. It was going to be a totally new | freedom for users. | | this was really the climax of so much of the aughts, such hope | vested in it. | | however development felt like it went really really slow. time | kept ticking. the API centric days of the web kept seeming to | grow further off all a while, while this set of protocols felt | under-developed under-supported; using the reference stack was | something I tried a couple of times & never quite latched on to. | i don't think alternative stacks ever came about, even though I | feel like this was a protocol-centric approach. | | a lot of this reflects my own likely deeply embellished memory. | OpenSocial felt like it represented a lot of hope for a web that | could emerge, a culmination of a lot of what was happening on the | web, in fancier form, distilled. and it feels like the turning | point where that- to me- far better web failed to really | materialize, failed to become a thing. there were still a couple | more years of good API based systems being the norm/expectation, | but the wind was running out of the sails, each fief of the web | collapsing back in to it's own. Google Plus launched 2011, not | long after OpenSocial was underway, and until it's demise it | never shipped an API for writing a post. you had to use their | client to do almost anything. this was a ghastly shocking turn, | back then, something that was almost unbelievable. now a days, | clients like Signal &al, this is de-jure, the norm. systems are | only what they were designed for you the user to get. | | i think of opensocial semi-regularly. at the time it felt like | the first big ride out for the "open web", like the beginnings of | a new frontier. it is with enormous & sadness & disappointment | that i report, here, a decade latter, that it feels like the last | & final ride out of the spirited, hopeful, connective open web, | that things only ever got worse after. | | one last little side note, one of the main people i associate | with OpenSocial, Dave Recordon, was just named Biden White | House's Director of Technology: | https://yro.slashdot.org/story/21/01/06/2129251/open-source-... | paulgb wrote: | Oh man, Wave brings back memories. I'm still a little sad it | wasn't given more of a shot --- the idea of an open ecosystem | of widgets sharing state using an OT (or similar?) backend is | still something we haven't seen done well, but in theory it | could allow some pretty neat things. | | It just didn't scale well, at the time. I wonder how it would | do on a modern browser --- or whether the backend was the | bottleneck. | lindner wrote: | So many thoughts about OpenSocial and the reference | implementation, Shindig. I have it thank for my time at hi5, | LinkedIn and then Google. | | Some little known facts about OpenSocial | | - Hangouts Apps (remember those?) were based on OpenSocial | containers. | | - OpenSocial powered the LinkedIn Apps Platform and Labs for a | number of years. The team built Rails and Node apps and deployed | on Joyent. | | - Eric Schmidt gave a pep talk to the working group pre-launch | and mentioned about how open always wins in the end... | | - MySpace was concerned about the attack surface of 3p apps | running in iframes. They toyed with the idea of requiring a | webkit browser plugin to run apps (!). It did lead to Caja* as a | project. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caja_project | | - The work on OpenSocial led in small part to the Activity | Streams spec which led to ActivityPub and thus the latest | Fediverse protocols. I like to think of OpenSocial as dead, but a | good organ donor. | | Fun times... | tschellenbach wrote: | That's some internet history right there. I actually used open | social back in the days. Of course post Cambridge Analytica | people now think that open systems and data portability are bad | :( | tqi wrote: | I actually don't think people have a consistent position here. | For most, whether or not an open system is good or bad is | largely dependent on how it affects their political group... | moolcool wrote: | Similarly, remember the conventional wisdom in the 90's of "To | stay safe, don't use your real name online"? But today real- | name policies are in place apparently to "keep us safe online". | tooltower wrote: | I was just thinking about this the other day. With Facebook | popularity in decline, what major social media still insists | on using real names? | | To be fair, I don't read their ToS very closely, so maybe | they all still require it. | musingsole wrote: | If the internet is to be viewed as a utility, anonymity is | going to be a hard question to address. Today, a water bill | is used for identification in getting a license. In the | future, government agencies might just have their own | tracking cookies. | | It's a win-win: you'll get through the DMV line even quicker! | /s | davidjnelson wrote: | We built a really cool enterprise social network with this at | Autodesk 10+ years ago. | blargmaster42_8 wrote: | The best part is that is XML first...to JSON crap! ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-01-11 22:00 UTC)