[HN Gopher] Intruder at the top of the 20 meter amateur band? ___________________________________________________________________ Intruder at the top of the 20 meter amateur band? Author : lmh Score : 84 points Date : 2021-01-11 18:26 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (ka7oei.blogspot.com) (TXT) w3m dump (ka7oei.blogspot.com) | cozzyd wrote: | Hope we don't see VHF or UHF traders soon. | bigmattystyles wrote: | Do exchanges like HF traders? I know HF traders themselves | justify their own existence by claiming they provide liquidity to | the markets, but I've always just sort-of rolled my eyes at that. | They only extract value and provide none, in my opinion, tax the | profits heavily. I think every exchange should pad each order by | a random number between 0 and 250ms, it would take care of it. | The company profiled in this video add lag | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8BcCLLX4N4 | cryptofistMonk wrote: | I'm sure the exchanges like the buckets of money that HFTs pay | them, even on their discounted commission fees. There's also | billions in industry just around supporting HFTs, including | FPGAs, silicon fab, networking equipment, etc. The cost to | society of killing HFTs would probably be fairly large and imo | the drawbacks are mostly minor. | vladTheInhaler wrote: | All of the money HFTs make _would_ have been made by other | investors, presumably for reasons more related to predicting | or responding to actual changes in market conditions. HFTs | are parasites that basically leech value from those trades by | executing them faster than you can, and forcing you to buy at | a higher /sell at a lower price. I think the platonic ideal | of a marketplace involves making money by determining the | actual value of goods, not stealing information from others | and jumping the line. | | They also contribute to a lot of market instability, see for | instance the flash crash[1]. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_flash_crash | hervature wrote: | I don't like these type of comments because they show | little understanding of how the market works. | | Explain the process in which the HFT firms "leech value" | from your trades or "[steal] information and [jump] the | line"? Your trade arrives at the exchange. Then, the HFT | firms learn about your trade. They then price correct many | instruments and derivatives that are all inter-related. | | Now, if we are talking about quote stuffing or | intentionally trying to DDoS exchanges, everyone agrees | this is bad behavior and is regulated against. | | Finally, as you mention, these type of algorithms | contributed to market instability of the flash crash but it | was also initiated by large (slow) directional bets. You | propose taking the oxygen out of the room of a fire but one | can also propose removing matches that started the fire. | matthewdgreen wrote: | If prices are out of line, that definitely seems like a | place where automated trading would be valuable. But | HFTs' tech advantage isn't just about finding a better | arbitrage algorithm or being smarter than the other | traders: it's also quite clearly about exploiting a pure | technical advantage over other traders. The fact that | HFTs are so willing to invest in speed _even to achieve a | tiny advantage over other HFTs_ kind of gives the game | away. | | And when people quite rightly observe that having a speed | advantage over other traders obviously allows extractive | behavior like frontrunning, a bunch of people on HN come | out with irate counter-takes that claim HFT are an | unalloyed good -- never something nuanced like, "yes HFT | could allow for some extractive behavior, but it's | counterbalanced by these advantages which I will explain | in detail." | | I guess it's also worth pointing out that these responses | are usually from people who are involved in the HFT | industry in some way, and usually they start out by | accusing people of "not understanding the industry". | Which is precisely the accusation many make against HFT: | that it's so deliberately opaque that whatever | indespensible contribution it's making can't easily be | teased out by non-insiders, and we have to rely on the | word of people who happen to be profiting from it. | kortilla wrote: | > The fact that HFTs are so willing to invest in speed | even to achieve a tiny advantage over other HFTs kind of | gives the game away. | | Re-pricing s&p500 futures offers in Chicago based on | faster stock offer information from nyc is fine. It's | improving a market making strategy or taking offers that | look like they will now be profitable. | | > And when people quite rightly observe that having a | speed advantage over other traders obviously allows | extractive behavior like frontrunning | | HFTs do not front run for fucks sake. It's illegal and | this meme needs to die. Front running is literally | putting your order in front of a client's order. | | Being the fastest to realize the bottom is falling out of | the s&p500 and selling the futures contracts on open bids | is not front running. | nickff wrote: | It's also possible that HFTs make _less_ money than other | traders would have made, if HFT is actually making markets | more liquid. | zozbot234 wrote: | HFT does enhance liquidity and price discovery. The advantage | to being "first" to trade is only there when multiple bidders | are issuing orders at the exact same price point, and this is | easily addressed by reducing minimum tick size so that price | choices will just naturally disperse (as opposed to all being | quantized at the same value). | lumost wrote: | My understanding is that HFTs function in a complete race to | the bottom, with the only profitable activity being to trade | faster and with slightly faster information than the next HFT. | There is no secret sauce to keep them from eating each other as | the costs to create a new HFT are not all that high vs. the | profit opportunity of shaving a few percent off the commissions | of the dominant trading system. Faster links and faster trades | between exchanges mean they carry less risk when carrying out | arbitrage (while also lowering the amount of arbitrage | available). | | The fact they made crazy profits initially is more of an | artifact that they were competing against humans rather than | other automated systems. In a few years we may see them reach | the point of diminishing returns where all exchanges share a | common pool of liquidity that adapts in a few millis to new | information. | bob1029 wrote: | Certainly exchanges love all paying customers. | | The liquidity argument is a good one IMO. If you did not have | participants willing to arbitrage fractions of a cent per | share, it could be really difficult to get the ends to meet on | a daily basis for things that arent traded with as much volume | as monsters like TSLA/AMD/et. al. | | The use of microwave links is just a natural consequence of | competition within the HFT space. It might be reasonable to | apply a minimum latency bound across the board as some | participants have already, but I argue this would inhibit much | of the innovation that got us to this point to start with. | Being able to quickly clear a trade on thinly-traded securities | is a wonderful thing for all involved. Capital not locked up in | limit orders is more useful to humanity (in most cases). | WarOnPrivacy wrote: | The inexact coordinates in the image lead to the front yard of | some farm. Now I can't stop thinking of Kash Hill's Maxmind story | | ref: | https://www.google.com/maps/place/41deg36'00.0"N+88deg36'00.0"W/ | | ref: https://splinternews.com/how-an-internet-mapping-glitch- | turn... | nosmokewhereiam wrote: | There's an update at the bottom: | | - Delmarva Broadband is authorized 14.35-14.99 MHz at 186 kW. | Contact is a law office in DC. See | https://apps.fcc.gov/els/GetAtt.htm | | - ... and M-Wave is authorized the 14-14.99 MHz at 16 kW. See | https://apps.fcc.gov/els/GetAtt.htm | Animats wrote: | Well, it shouldn't be hard at that power level to find the | transmitter if you're anywhere nearby. | uncledave wrote: | Not sure I understand the point of using that band past amateur | radio. Around 20m band is terrible for point to point | communications. The antennas are huge, the bandwidth is low, the | noise floor is really high and it's prone to just about every | annoying atmospheric condition possible. | twic wrote: | Bandwidth doesn't need to be huge for HFT. If you can send a | message saying "there was a big upward movement in the price of | instrument X", that's enough to be incredibly valuable if it | gets to the other end before anyone else knows about it. There | might only be a few dozen instruments you're interested in, and | a few events for each one, so being able to send a single byte | could be enough. | | Obviously, more bandwidth is useful, because you can send more | details, and make better decisions at the receiving end. But | most of the value is in getting a small message there fast. | Animats wrote: | If you use 186 kilowatts, you can punch through much of that. | ridaj wrote: | Why suspect HFTs over other potential interfering applications? | Could be anything | intrepidhero wrote: | Wouldn't a high frequency trader be building point to point links | and thus benefit hugely from highly directional antennas? Seems | like that would help with the interference quite a bit. | lmilcin wrote: | At that power any spill would still be a very strong signal. | | Directional antennas are like gun silencers. They cause the | signal to be many times weaker and it seems a lot until you | figure out that the receiver works on a log scale and whatever | is left is still registered as a strong signal. | jaywalk wrote: | A point to point link from Chicago to NYC would require many | hops along the way, which is what they have with microwave | today. The whole point of experimenting with the 20 meter band | is to eliminate those hops. | client4 wrote: | More like Chicago to Seattle. | walrus01 wrote: | For HFT purposes, it's hard to hide an intercontinental range HF | antenna, particularly a directional one. I know at least 3 | locations not far from the illinois CME datacenter, out in some | fields, with huge yagi-uda antennas aimed at London and tokyo. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-01-11 22:00 UTC)