[HN Gopher] Qualcomm to Acquire Nuvia: A CPU Magnitude Shift ___________________________________________________________________ Qualcomm to Acquire Nuvia: A CPU Magnitude Shift Author : pella Score : 136 points Date : 2021-01-13 14:08 UTC (8 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.anandtech.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.anandtech.com) | nirv wrote: | Quite sad news, to be honest. | | I hoped that Nuvia, given its great team of ex-Apple CPU | architect engineers, would maintain its independence and become a | full-fledged competitor in the desktop and server market. | Instead, they sold to a company that is often described as "the | Oracle of hardware companies" and "a law firm with a few | engineers"[1][2][3]. | | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18333270 | | [2] | https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-22/qualcomm-... | | [3] | https://old.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/71rjyx/why_exynos_... | wyldfire wrote: | > maintain its independence and become a full-fledged | competitor in the desktop and server market. | | If I had to guess, Nuvia's expertise will be used to optimize | Qualcomm's ARM, Adreno and Hexagons for the next generation of | Snapdragon cx. Qualcomm and Microsoft dipped their toe into | this market and now that Apple is all-in, they need an answer | to the M1. They won't get there with reference designs from | ARM. | | But once they're producing optimized ARMs for SoC apps | processors, who's to say that they couldn't re-enter the server | space? | robotresearcher wrote: | Viterbi was a founder. He was an historically significant | engineer. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Viterbi | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viterbi_algorithm | devwastaken wrote: | With how similar processors are can you even have a small | company without being threatened by patents at every corner? | Part of the capitalism endgame isn't innovation, but to buy up | potential competitors by having grey area ownership of the | mechanisms they work with. Sometimes letting those companies | then use your patents to continue work. | blinkingled wrote: | But on the other hand they didn't have many other viable | options did they? Their expertise is ARM and they need a BigCo | to back their R&D and subsequently manufacturing. So that | leaves them with Nvidia and Samsung as options. | wmf wrote: | No, I think they could survive independently on VC funding. | blinkingled wrote: | Having read HN I got the impression that VC funding isn't | always a good thing either. How is VC funding at this level | better? (It might well be I just don't have any insight.) | wmf wrote: | I don't know which route is better (clearly the Nuvia | team decided to accept the acquisition) but I think | independence would have been possible. | oblio wrote: | > Instead, they sold to a company that is often described as | "the Oracle of hardware companies" and "a law firm with a few | engineers" | | Didn't Qualcomm beat out a ton of competitors? | ohazi wrote: | Yes, using patents. | | They got lucky and a handful of their early patents became | required parts of early cellular standards. Since then | they've lobbied the standards bodies to include features that | require their newest patents. When that fails, because the | mobile manufacturers are tired of Qualcomm's monopoly, they | simply buy up more patents to make up the difference. | baybal2 wrote: | Yet, very remarkable given that they were nearly stomped out | of the market around 2010-2012 by previously "no-name" SoC | makers, making cookie cutter SoCs cheap, fast, and selling by | tons. | | Yet, they recovered, and clawed back their way to the top, | with only MediaTek now threatening them. | | I don't expect MediaTek to be as inept, and Pavlovian if | Qualcomm will ever come to them with a deal, as they did with | Allwinner 8 years ago (Allwinner gave up on mobile market, | and Qualcomm gave them an obscene cut from their low-end | Snapdragons in return.) | | And knowing Taiwanese, they simply don't sell companies | owners spent their life working on. Very ego driven business | culture. | robert_foss wrote: | Mediatek has 31% market share of the smartphone SOC market, | and Qualcomm 29%. | | https://www.counterpointresearch.com/mediatek-biggest- | smartp... | [deleted] | modeless wrote: | I hope this means they are at least going to try to catch Apple. | The complete lack of effort by them on the CPU side has been sad. | Given hardware timelines, though, I'm sure any improvement is | many years away. | tambourine_man wrote: | What are the chances of lawsuits in the near future? | | Not my area of expertise by a long shot, but Qualcomm and Apple | are not strangers in court and acquiring a slew of ex-Apple CPU | engineers is probably like trowing gas on that fire. | wmf wrote: | The lawsuit is already happening: | https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-14/nuvia-exe... | tambourine_man wrote: | Yeah, I remember that one and was referring to it as well. | | What I mean is, what are the chances of new ones in light of | this acquisition? Or is this old one not settled yet and it's | still the same case? | liminal wrote: | Microsoft must be kicking themselves for not acquiring them | arusahni wrote: | I initially read this as "NVidia". I'm still recovering from the | shock. | jannes wrote: | Happened to me too. I was already thinking about Qualcomm | suddenly owning ARM (through Nvidia) and how anti-competitive | that would be. | shroom wrote: | Think everyone did :D | jabl wrote: | That's kind of interesting considering Qualcomm spent plenty-o- | millions not many years ago to develop the ARM64 Falcor core and | Centriq server SoC, only to throw it all away just before it was | supposed to hit the market. | wyldfire wrote: | It is a shame but I think they figured they had to go on a diet | or risk an LBO. | robocat wrote: | Is this a common scenario? Bet all capital on a new product, | and get bought out at the low point in market valuation: | before the product has shown promise and the market price has | still not recovered? | | Edit: I am wondering about older companies more than startups | (presumably it is more common for startups that look like | failing but are actually on brink of success). | wyldfire wrote: | I don't think it's common, no. In the 1980s I think it | happened more often (because they had a lot of assets that | weren't reflected in the valuation maybe?). | | But in Qualcomm's case they were arguably undervalued | because of ongoing regulation/lawsuits regarding their | licensing practices. IIRC they had shipped their Amberwing | Centriq CPU but the reception was kinda lukewarm. | | AWS ended up introducing Graviton not long after - | presumably AWS wouldn't have sourced Centriq if they had | their own designs in the works. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualcomm_Centriq | [deleted] | klelatti wrote: | That was in response to the Broadcom bid I think? Corporate | vandalism. | Iolaum wrote: | Do I remember wrong that Nuvia higher ups have stated that they | wanted to bring products to market rather than get acquired? P.S. | I know such statements shouldn't be taken at face value anyway. | Just curious. | WatchDog wrote: | 1.4B, not bad for 2 years of work. | solarkraft wrote: | Is it true that this will uniquely position them to compete with | Apple's processors while everyone keeps having to use the bog | standard (and apparently not _that_ amazing) Cortex cores? | | Are there other companies able to produce promising cores/any | that could develop a serious M1 competitor? | | Was this acquisition mostly fueled by M1 hype (i.e. "Cortext | chips are just fine")? | ksec wrote: | Replying to distract myself from the Intel news. | | Nuvia has shown [1] they have designs with Pref Per Watts that | rivals or exceed Apple's current A14. Normally these sort of pre- | design and slides should be taken with a big pinch of salt from | Startup. But this is from Gerard Williams, ARM Fellow and | Architect of all current Apple CPU design. So i think they are | plausible. | | The improvement in Single Thread Performance is what Qualcomm | desperately needs for their SnapDragon SoC. It will also reboot | their ARM on Server work now that Apple and Amazon has the ball | rolling. | | Tremendous respect for CEO Steven Mollenkopf, retiring later this | summer. | | [1] https://www.anandtech.com/show/15967/nuvia-phoenix- | targets-5... | BugsJustFindMe wrote: | > _Nuvia has shown [1] they have designs with Pref Per Watts | that rivals or exceed Apple 's current A14._ | | Your linked article 1) doesn't mention A14, and 2) only | contains a marketing image for something that didn't yet exist. | It doesn't appear like they _showed_ anything. Did you mean to | link to a different article? | gigatexal wrote: | Qualcomm CPUs for both mobile and non-mobile should be even more | compelling in the near future with this acquisition. Apple has a | legit competitor here. | rektide wrote: | $1.4 billion. Wow. That's a lot of dough. | | I feel like 202x might be another decade where no new chip making | companies emerge. I had great hopes for Nuvia becoming one of | them. My first most primitive reaction is that this is like | another PA Semi[1]: great talent & new prospects, fresh air, | vanishing into one of the super-massive existing players. | | Qualcomm does some open source work, but most of the support | comes from outside engineers reverse engineering their products | or otherwise doing the work[2]. The Freedreno graphics driver for | example allows their gpu to be used (OpenGL, Vulkan drivers), & | has been a huge effort. That work mostly comes from Google | engineers like Rob Clark (who started Freedreno iirc), Eric | Anholt, Igalia engineers like Danil, & countless others[3]. | | In the wifi-router world, where Qualcomm also has a huge | presence, we rely on hunting around for open-source code drops of | what usually seems like pretty old but better than we've got | code, such as this recent find[4], which is hopefully going to | help us catch a couple years up in support level to what Qualcomm | is doing today. | | Nuvia explicitly stated they wanted to chase hyperscaler market. | And I think a lot of this was positioning. That hyper-scalers | wanted good tech, would use good tech. Where-as a lot of the | world, they want what they have but better, a lot of legacy | concerns, hand holding. Nuvia wanted to build a new platform, a | good, well supported platform, with next-gen technologies. We | were all expecting open-source perhaps Rust-based firmwares & | management systems, pursuant to latest OpenCompute Project specs | &c. They were clear about targetting hyper-scalers, & big chips, | but somehow the hope always was that they'd help reform & reshape | computing & what was available to everyone. They certainly talked | the good game, sounded real good on Twitter. Ah well. | | [1] https://venturebeat.com/2012/09/18/more-details-shake- | loose-... | | [2] https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=search&q=Qualcomm | | [3] https://github.com/mesa3d/mesa/commits/master/src/freedreno | | [4] https://forum.openwrt.org/t/adding-openwrt-support-for- | xiaom... | avrionov wrote: | > NUVIA was originally founded in February 2019 | | Do they hold the record for the fastest and most profitable exit? | zyang wrote: | This is deja vu of the Uber - Otto aquisition. | wmf wrote: | Netscape did a $2.9B IPO after 17 months. | avrionov wrote: | Adjusted for inflation Netscape price is much higher, but at | least they had a working product and big team. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-01-13 23:00 UTC)