[HN Gopher] Otokichi ___________________________________________________________________ Otokichi Author : Thevet Score : 173 points Date : 2021-01-25 17:33 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org) (TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org) | yudlejoza wrote: | It just occurred to me, boats have been around way before 1492, | and they would drift away by accident, just like in this case, | more often than not. | | Hence, folks from East Asia drifted away and landed on west coast | of North America all the time, from time immemorial to 1492, and | all of them were designated native/indigenous. | | Conclusion: Asia to America migration didn't only happen through | Bering/Beringia land bridge pre-10000 BC? | | Question: Has there been any investigation of similarities | between west coast indigenous languages and Asian languages, esp. | Japanese? | runarberg wrote: | I feel like people often leave the numerous Inuit and pre-inuit | migration across the Bering straight on canoes and kayaks. | | Follow up questions: Is there any research on how much of pre- | inuit culture spread southwards to Indian cultures? How much | Asian culture did the Inuit and pre-inuit cultures take with | them to America? | tsimionescu wrote: | You need to also take into account the likelihood of them | surviving the trip and reaching a shore. It has likely been an | extremely minute amount of people who would have done this, | almost certainly too insignificant to influence the culture or | genes in any way. | tpmx wrote: | Ship building technology development is an important factor you | didn't factor in. You'd need a ship that can survive crossing | the pacific and also enough rations of food to survive the | trip. | | In this case they also used some desalination tech to survive | those 14 months, per the article. | | Edit: More details: | | https://www.historylink.org/File/9065 | | > The crew had an adequate food supply (rice from the cargo, | supplemented with fish and an occasional seagull). They could | collect rainwater for drinking. They probably had on board a | device called a ranbiki, _normally used to brew sake_ , which | they could have used to desalinate water from the sea. They | also could have distilled saltwater simply by boiling it. But | they had no source of vitamin C. By the time the ship washed | ashore near Cape Flattery on a wintery day in 1834, there were | only three survivors. Most of their crewmates had died of | scurvy. | | (That essay seems to have a lot of other interesting details, | by the way.) | TedDoesntTalk wrote: | From the essay you linked: | | "Traces of Japan were not entirely unknown in the Northwest. | More than 1,000 Japanese ships are estimated to have | disappeared during the Exclusion Era (1633-1854). Most | presumably sank in storms, but iron fittings and other | remnants of some of those ships washed up on the Northwest | coast over time. A few drifted to coastal areas farther south | with survivors on board. According to historian Frederik L. | Schodt, at least 34 Japanese sailors reached the shores of | North America or Mexico on disabled ships between 1806 and | 1852. One of the best known cases involved the Tokujomaru, | which ran aground near Santa Barbara, California, in 1813, | with three survivors out of a crew of 14. But until the | Hojunmaru, there is no record of the presence of any | Japanese, sailors or otherwise, in what is now the state of | Washington." | blacksmith_tb wrote: | And the iron was being reused to make tools, on a fairly | large scale apparently[1] | | 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallurgy_in_pre- | Columbian_Am... | [deleted] | JamesLeonis wrote: | For a direct answer to your question, the Polynesians populated | much of the vast Pacific ocean and founded many island native | lineages. There is some strong evidence they came into contact | with West Coast American natives within the last couple | thousand years [0]. | | > We find conclusive evidence for prehistoric contact of | Polynesian individuals with Native American individuals (around | AD 1200) contemporaneous with the settlement of remote Oceania. | Our analyses suggest strongly that a single contact event | occurred in eastern Polynesia, before the settlement of Rapa | Nui, between Polynesian individuals and a Native American group | most closely related to the indigenous inhabitants of present- | day Colombia. | | [0]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2487-2.epdf | deaddodo wrote: | It's probably a good idea to point out that the evidence for | Polynesian/S. American contact is extremely scant and mostly | conjectural. This is a _very_ controversial topic among | archeologists and historians and there are biased | interpretations on both sides. | selimthegrim wrote: | Isn't there some speculation about Chumash dugout making | techniques too around Santa Barbara? | Mediterraneo10 wrote: | > Has there been any investigation of similarities between west | coast indigenous languages and Asian languages, esp. Japanese? | | Yes, plenty, and no similarities have been found in reputable | scholarship. (Note that when Gavin Menzies, the crackpot | historian whose claim is that the Chinese explored the whole | world pre-Columbus, stated that West Coast indigenous languages | bear a resemblance to Chinese, he had to base himself on 19th- | century conjectures that were pre-scientific and now totally | discredited. Nancy Yaw Davis's theory that the Zuni people of | North America are related to the Japanese, is also not taken | seriously by any historical linguist). | | The Japanese language itself only entered Japan in the last | centuries BC/first centuries AD. Japanese is originally from | the Asian continent and displaced whatever languages were | spoken on the Japanese isles before. So, that's only a few | centuries when Japanese speakers could have somehow come into | contact with Native Americans, and there doesn't seem to be any | firm evidence for it. | dyeje wrote: | I'm not familiar with boat technology through the ages but it | seems like it would be pretty uncommon for someone to survive | an accidental journey across the Pacific considering people die | doing so in modern times when attempting it intentionally. | opportune wrote: | I think this is almost trivially true due to | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yupik_peoples | tpmx wrote: | That crossing was from North Asia (Siberia), not East Asia | though? Crossing the Bering strait (88 km) seems a _lot_ less | demanding than crossing the pacific from East Asia to North | America (~7000 km or so). | nnf wrote: | That's an interesting question, though I wonder if many such | people would have survived the journey all the way across the | ocean without access to fresh water or an understanding (and | the necessary materials) for desalinating seawater. Some may | have, but there are lots of filters working against survival, | of increasing efficiency the further back in time we look. | ksm1717 wrote: | Check out Thor Heyerdahl and his Kon Tiki expedition. I believe | that his theory was about religions and this pacific drift | phenomena. There's a very cool museum outside of Oslo. | | I think that their findings have eventually been proven less | meaningful than they thought, but still cool. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kon-Tiki_expedition | masklinn wrote: | > Hence, folks from East Asia drifted away and landed on west | coast of North America all the time, from time immemorial to | 1492, and all of them were designated native/indigenous. | | Most of them would be designated "dead" _at the very best_. | Odds were they wouldn 't be designated anything because the | ship would sink long before it got through the pacific: aside | from polynesian navigators (which likely had at least some pre- | columbian contact with the americas) navigation was coast- | hugging and ships were simply not designed to survive through | the Pacific. And then the crew would still need to survive | through a journey they were completely unprepared for. | | Not to mention the pacific doesn't really work that way: | usually the ship would get caught in the gyres and never make | it out, without wilful navigation it'd have incredibly low odds | of catching the Alaska current or the equatorial counter- | current. | FactCore wrote: | A very interesting little story. I wasn't surprised when I saw | that a movie about this had been made in the 80s. Although, I was | also not surprised to see a healthy amount of [citation needed]. | Oh well, no good story comes without a bit of embellishment, | right? | keiferski wrote: | Fascinating story. I had to dig a bit but I found the Johnny Cash | film mentioned in the article: | | https://youtube.com/watch?v=bLOFpfjW_So&t=18s | ticklemyelmo wrote: | Now I'm not sure if the poster was influenced by this Omnibus | episode: | | https://www.omnibusproject.com/324 | | or I've been influenced by these episodes: | | https://www.omnibusproject.com/310 | | https://www.omnibusproject.com/311 | inglor_cz wrote: | Is there anybody who could confirm that even castaways were | subject to death penalty upon return to the shogunate? That | sounds really cruel. | beering wrote: | There was another castaway who eventually did return to Japan | and was made a samurai because of his English skills and | potential utility to the government: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakahama_Manjir%C5%8D | | Otokichi's Wikipedia article also indicates that he was given | permission to live in Japan again. | jedimastert wrote: | Presumably it would have been assumed they were lying to avoid | death. | ksm1717 wrote: | I think it's hilarious that the head of the British colony found | 3 random Japanese people (2 of which were not even 18) and sent | them to England to attempt to use them as trade diplomats | jabbany wrote: | To be fair, average life expectancy of people around that | period (early to mid 1800s) was at best ~40, so "18" would have | been basically middle-aged ;-) | hnuser123456 wrote: | That's expectancy at birth. If you made it to 20, you were | likely to make it to 60, even in the mid 1800s. | | https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsde. | .. | setr wrote: | _average_ life expectancy is a trap -- the distribution is | binomial. People tended to either die early, as infants, or | live to an average 60.[0] Specifically, if you were age 0, | you have an expected lifespan of 40, but by age 10, you have | an expected lifespan of 60. Today expected lifespan after | reaching age 10 is better, but not as extreme as the average | tells you: you 'd expect to hit to live to 77. [1] | | So most people who were actually wandering out of their cribs | would have found 60 to be a perfectly normal age; and 40 | would still be middle aged -- the past wasn't _that_ much | different from the present :) | | you just wouldn't expect to see _great-grandfathers_ as often | (but at the same time, you don 't see many today because the | average first child-birth age has shifted upwards as well[2]) | | [0] https://www.infoplease.com/us/health-statistics/life- | expecta... | | [1] https://gcanyon.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/life-expectancy- | in-... | | [2] https://www.researchgate.net/figure/A-Average-maternal- | age-a... | ksm1717 wrote: | Fool. You thought you could just tap into a community of | chronic mansplainers and pedants to mention historic life | expectancy without the "infant mortality rate" caveat? | setr wrote: | I mean, the derived conclusion is entirely wrong because of | it. It's kind of 100% relevant. | ksm1717 wrote: | It was a joke... | jcpenny1 wrote: | Glad I am not the only one who thought this. | baxtr wrote: | I would love to see that life story in a film (any Netflix people | around?!). One of the most captivating Wikipedia entries I've | ever read. | illwrks wrote: | Scorsese put out a film called 'Silence' a few years ago. It's | set in that period, stars Liam Neeson, Andrew Garfield and Adam | Driver. It's a heavily skewed religious film but very good. | nnf wrote: | It is endlessly fascinating to me to contemplate how much the | world has changed in a relatively short period of time, and | specifically with regards to how much time was required for | communication between people separated by great distances. | themodelplumber wrote: | Fascinating. Something that made me curious: | | > There the ship was fired on repeatedly, and King was not able | to accomplish his objective to establish diplomatic contact | | So...why not place a brief message into a few bottles and drop | them in the waters around the populated zones? "We have here your | citizens named so-and-so, and will return around this date, and | then this date + about 12M, to try again. Please don't shoot." | Include handwritten notes from the survivors to the families / | friends. | | Surely this method (among others) would stand at least a | chance...as compared to ~20 years of unfortunate delay in | connection. | kipchak wrote: | My understanding is that during the period (1600 to 1868) | leaving the country, even by accident was punishable by death. | better treatment of shipwrecked American sailors was part of | the demands of Perry's expedition in the Convention of | Kanagawa. | | >For the Japanese the punishment for leaving the country (and | coming back) was death. The Japanese view at the time was that | their world was complete and their was no place in it for | crude, materialistic and barbaric Westerners. It was one of the | few times in modern history that a nation rejected "progress." | Punishments were equally harsh for foreigner that arrived in | Japan. Thirteen members of a group of Portuguese merchants that | arrived in 1640 were executed. The rest returned home with the | message: "Think of us no more."[1] | | [1]http://factsanddetails.com/japan/cat16/sub107/item504.html | | [2]https://unseenjapan.com/edo-era-castaways-in-russia/ | themodelplumber wrote: | That's curious. So did the survivors not know about the | perishable by death factor? Otherwise I'd expect that they'd | also fight the return in any way possible... | Taniwha wrote: | I suspect the goal would have been to sneak back home | (rather than arrive on a big western sailing ship) | kipchak wrote: | I would guess they knew what awaited them, but hoped | efforts to open the country would be successful and they | would be allowed to return. The Manhattan was able to | return some sailors to Japan in 1845[1] that shipwrecked in | Japanese waters, making the rule seem somewhat flexible. | | I think an earlier version of the Perry expedition helmed | by John Aulick intended to try and return 17 Japanese | sailors as a sign of good faith/bargaining tool.[2] | | [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_(1843_ship) | | [2]https://www.classicsofstrategy.com/2015/07/commodore- | perry-o... | saberdancer wrote: | If they wanted to get them to shore, they could have thrown | anchor at any spot other than next to a fortress armed with | guns. Then you row them to the shore and leave. It's not like | there was mass surveillance or ability to identify anyone. | | It's likely the captain had no big incentive to go out of his | way for these Japanese so when he wasn't allowed in port, he | just left. | themodelplumber wrote: | Good points, I took a deeper look and found this article with | more details: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morrison_incident | | > King anchored at a safe distance, out of range of the shore | batteries. Men from several small fishing ships boarded the | SS Morrison, and sake and cookies were shared until late in | the night. By daybreak, however, cannons had been brought | closer to the seaside, and they were again fired at the ship. | Hundreds of small boats, each with a small cannon at the | front, also started to surround and attack the ship. The | Morrison sailed away, with little damage. | | > King then sailed to Kagoshima in Kyushu.[2] The first day | he met some officials there, who took two of the castaways | into custody. The following day, a fisherman came alongside | and warned the sailors to leave immediately. As the ship was | setting its sails, the Japanese opened fire from cannons they | had moved to the proximity of the ship during the night. King | decided to abandon the mission and returned to Canton with | the remaining castaways. | | ...and eventually: | | > The nature of the ship's mission became known one year | after the event, and this resulted in increased criticism of | the Edict. | | So it sounds like a lot of ignorance collided with the Big | Foreign Ship phenomenon and the castaway got caught in the | middle. Some lucky, some not so lucky (for now) | miohtama wrote: | Leaving Japan was punishable by death | themodelplumber wrote: | Was this really the case for castaways caught in storms, who | expected to come back? | Tarsul wrote: | in the wiki article it's stated twice that they feared | coming back due to this (once going back only disguised as | a Chinese person. Although the second time he came back it | appears he did not hide his identity). I'd bet it's a | question of credibility. E.g. would you risk that the | Japanese do not believe you and hence kill you? It's tough. | SECProto wrote: | > Although the second time he came back it appears he did | not hide his identity | | The second time he went back, it was apparently as part | of the group negotiating the Anglo-Japanese Friendship | Treaty[1], so it makes sense he wouldn't necessarily fear | being killed | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo- | Japanese_Friendship_Trea... | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-01-25 23:00 UTC)