[HN Gopher] u/DeepFuckingValue and the GameStop Reddit mania ___________________________________________________________________ u/DeepFuckingValue and the GameStop Reddit mania Author : gangwolf Score : 153 points Date : 2021-01-29 15:05 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.wsj.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.wsj.com) | TerribleHeight wrote: | Hi Keith, what do you think about CytoDyn (cydy)? Their | monoclonal drug Leronlimab has 3 different clinical trials with | FDA and are FAST TRACKED. They've also applied for an upgrade to | NASDQ. Current price $5.38. Their suppose to release results any | day now on the COVID trial. | doublerabbit wrote: | Add a . to the end of wsj.com to get past the paywall. | Stevvo wrote: | The "Bypass Paywalls" extension is also effective, although you | may want to limit the number of extensions you run for memory | usage or performance reasons. | cookie_monsta wrote: | Nice, thanks. FF on android | jjazwiecki wrote: | or safari | anand-bala wrote: | Doesn't seem to work on Firefox mobile. | _-david-_ wrote: | Worked fine for me on Firefox for Android. To be clear you | should do wsj.com./ | winter_blue wrote: | It doesn't work on Chrome either. | u678u wrote: | I like Matt Levine's comment " The guy behind one of the greatest | trades of our time was giving out financial advice for | MassMutual, and somehow they let him go." | | edit I missed the best part of the quote "I hope he showed up at | client meetings in a headband and sunglasses with a glass of | champagne in one hand and a chicken tender in the other. I hope | he was like "never mind life insurance, man, you gotta buy | GameStop calls! Get those tendies!" And then I hope the clients | were like "what" and MassMutual fired him and he just went and | did the thing. " | | https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-01-29/reddit... | hehehaha wrote: | Really helps discredit this notion of retail vs hedge fund. | Most people who frequently make "DD" posts to r/wsb have ties | to the financial industry and Wall Street. They either work | there or have worked there. And yet they are critical of the | Man? This is like ex-Facebook employees having a found-Jesus | moment. | hangonhn wrote: | I worked at a hedge fund as my first job on the IT and Dev | side. I will never put my money in a hedge fund. Just the way | they spend money to boost the sense of self importance, etc. | is nauseating. I once Fedex-ed a ream of printer paper from | NYC to a partner on vacation in Miami because he was too | entitled to drive to the nearest office supply store. I | literally found a store like 10 minutes away but was told to | just Fedex the paper. Then there were the allegations of PIPE | and various other SEC investigations that always end up | settling without any admission of guilt. | | There are quite a few genuinely good people in finance so | don't be surprised to find good people doing good things who | also work in finance but finance also attracts a lot of | people who are amoral at best. I shake my head at the memory | of one of the partners screaming at someone over the phone, | "This isn't even illegal! How is it immoral!?" | tootie wrote: | I think this is almost expected behavior. Anybody who spends | enough time in the trenches of any industry will come out | jaded and bitter. In my limited time working on the tech side | of some Wall St giants, 99% of the grunts are normal people | with their noses in very narrow tasks. Tasks that seem too | mundane to have any implications for the outside world. I | even heard a top marketing exec at Goldman talk about how to | shed their image as a "vampire squid". None of them set out | to be evil, they just set out to earn profits. Same everybody | else. | toomuchtodo wrote: | Some folks have no choice but to bootstrap at The Man. | There's no startup accelerator for starting your own fund. | hehehaha wrote: | Yes, my comment was harsh. I am happy for the guy, really, | especially as a Bostonian. | [deleted] | throwaway0a5e wrote: | You can hate how the sausage is made and still work at the | sausage factory. | | Banking has a healthier culture than tech when it comes to | how much what you do to make your living defines you. | TerribleHeight wrote: | Hi Keith, what do u think of CytoDyn cydy? Their monoclonal drug | Leronlimab has 3 clinical trials with the FDA and has a fast | track designation. They've also applied for an upgrade to NASDQ. | Current price is $5.38. Their suppose to release results on their | COVD trial any day now. | PaulDavisThe1st wrote: | not really an interview. It wasn't clear they even talked to him | at all? | | [EDIT: ok, they did talk to him, but this still isn't what most | publications would call "an interview" ] | dang wrote: | Ok, I've taken 'interview' out of the title above. Not | necessary really. | ksherlock wrote: | "This story is so much bigger than me," Mr. Gill told The Wall | Street Journal in his first interview since the unboxing this | week of a volatile new stock-market game. "I support these | retail investors, their ability to make a statement." | PaulDavisThe1st wrote: | They seem to have gotten a couple of comments from him, then | fleshed it out with remarks from his mother and a few other | online identities, plus some simple background research. | | Nothing like I would expect for "an interview with...", which | would normally be dominated by the subject's own words. | f430 wrote: | What makes WSB legal vs emails about imminent pump on an | unspectacular stock? | | What stops somebody from purchasing aged reddit accounts and then | pumping up, upvoting their own threads? | seanalltogether wrote: | matt levine talks about this very thing in one of his other | posts on wsj | | > So if you buy stock with the purpose of pushing the price up | so that other people will buy it, that's market manipulation. | If you buy stock hoping that the price will go up because other | people buy it, that's not market manipulation; that's just | normal. Those things are not so different. There is a | "traditional four-part test for manipulation that has developed | in case law": (1) That the accused had the | ability to influence market prices; (2) that the accused | specifically intended to create or effect a price or price | trend that does not reflect legitimate forces of supply and | demand; (3) that artificial prices existed; and (4) that the | accused caused the artificial prices. | neuronic wrote: | The law doesn't matter anymore because it never mattered for | the rich. The normal folks still remember the 2008 bail outs | were the criminal Wall St gang got off the hook using tax | payer money. | | I don't really think the Wall St gangsters will have such a | good time for that much longer. | JacobSuperslav wrote: | nothing. I'm in the social media business and I can tell you | it's very easy to make $30-50k a month gaming reddit(as an | individual) using farmed accounts and it's been going on for | years. Not necessarily with stock schemes. they got next to | none security when it comes to stuff like this. agency that I | worked at a few years ago literally had thousands of aged | reddit/twitter accounts in their portfolio. there are whole | apps available for sale that manage your reddit farms including | fingerprint faking, proxy management, captcha | solving(outsourced to developing countries), etc. the market | for it is pretty huge. | sn_master wrote: | Look at DFV's account. He's been talking about GME since | mid-2019. | findjashua wrote: | web archive: http://archive.today/iP9IX | devops000 wrote: | I hope one day we will see an IPFS link | eMGm4D0zgUAVXc7 wrote: | Why do people constantly have to re-invent the wheel? :( | | Freenet [0] has been providing censorship-resistant, | anonymous, decentralized hosting for 20 years - and is still | in active development! | | You could upload it to Freenet without any server whatsoever | and it would stay online for as long as it is popular, even | if your machine goes offline. | | And you'd be anonymous while doing so! | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet | prepend wrote: | Freenet doesn't make money for speculators like ipfs. | Making gobs of money is an important feature driving wheel | reinvention, I think. | BitwiseFool wrote: | Thank you for sharing, I didn't even know this existed and | no one brought it up during the deplatforming debate this | month. | junippor wrote: | Wow ok. The value of HN has decreased to almost zero for | me, but you've made it worth the month. Thanks for this! | kevincox wrote: | https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmTW7sdBbZ1BXau8Cmrpv5srf38GZi1AiWWBBkv. | .. | | There you go. It's not perfect though because a lot of the | links still point to live assets. Captured the important | bits. | pmlnr wrote: | What is stopping you from making and sharing one? | motoboi wrote: | How to generate one? | t-writescode wrote: | Compared to the general air I've been seeing about articles | hating on a bunch of Redditors, this one is decidedly more | neutral and seems to speak more about what is actually happening | than "redditors bad, mess with stock, they evil". | | I appreciate that. Not enough to give WSJ $20 (!!!) a month, but | I do appreciate it. | misiti3780 wrote: | I'm honestly confused by the press around this event. | | I get it, /DFV started a short squeeze and got rich, that is | great for him. I don't support naked shorting, it should probably | be illegal (if it is not already) and it looks that was part of | the reason this happened. Everyone has been suspecting for a | while (especially here) that a lot of volatility in stocks like | TSLA etc was due to Robinhood. | | As of 5:33 EST, I'm on CNN right now and the main headline | "Inside the Reddit army that's crushing Wall Street" (And the | reddit army isnt crushing Wall Street, it's crushing a few hedge | funds that happened to hold short positions in a few stocks. ) , | so now a lot portion of America (and the world) is paying | attention. | | Hedge funds blow up all the time. Enron blew up, basically all of | the Investment Banks blew up in 2008, LTCM blew up. Why is this | such a big deal? | kzrdude wrote: | But he didn't start a short squeeze, he invested in it before | thinking it would be a short squeeze. | afterburner wrote: | > Everyone has been suspecting for a while (especially here) | that a lot of volatility in stocks like TSLA etc was due to | Robinhood. | | You sure about that? TSLA has a market cap of 750b. GME, _now_ | , is at 20b. Before this insanity it was a fraction of that. | semi-extrinsic wrote: | I've also seen some speculation that Citadel may have been | intentionally amplifying the short squeeze caused by Redditors, | and then getting a sweet deal with Melvin capital by injecting | money the latter sorely needed in exchange for a share of | future revenue. | | I don't understand exactly how the math works out there to be | able to evaluate if it was an extra good deal or not, but I | find it credible that institutional investors jumping on the | Reddit hype would be necessary in ordet to sustain the kind of | momentum we are seeing. | MuffinFlavored wrote: | > I'm honestly confused by the press around this event. | | A lot of people wish they struck it rich, just like him. Money | (to some degree) buys happiness. Gets you out of a job you | don't like. Gets you more time with your family, less time | doing stuff you don't like (like working). | | If the poor can "eat the rich" and "catch them with their | shorts down" in a stock trade that literally millions of others | are pouring into (check how many subscribers r/wsb has gained | past 7 days), it's literal herd mentality. | misiti3780 wrote: | ya sure, i get it .... but he took a bet and won, He could | have easily lost everything. For every winner in the options | game there are probably 99 losers. It's call survivorship | bias. | afterburner wrote: | He could have lost 50k, his initial investment, and | considering he's young, and has a house, this would not | represent ruin for him. | misiti3780 wrote: | If you are downvoting me, please say why. | [deleted] | sumedh wrote: | > it's crushing a few hedge funds | | To be fair Robinhood also had to get extra funding to cover its | liquidity issues. | | IB CEO also said they had to stop GME buying or else it might | take down the system. | eternalny1 wrote: | He posted his daily update today, he has not sold his shares | through all of this chaos. | | Talk about "diamond hands". | | https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l846a1/gme_... | tedunangst wrote: | A week ago he had 1000 option contracts, now he's at 500. | Dirlewanger wrote: | This is one of the very, very few positive stories about how | powerful the Internet can be to the masses. Keith is no different | from Jim Kramer yelling on CNBC to buy some stock and watching it | spike because their boomer audience raced to their landline | phones and told their financial advisors to invest. It's just at | a much faster pace, and old media is scared shitless of it, so | they endlessly denigrate the people involved and call for daddy | government to stop it. | | Unfortunately I don't think it's going to end well for retail | investors. | kgog wrote: | So when he posted back in June, his GME holding was $121k. | According to his YouTube video from then, that represented ~2% of | his portfolio. That puts his portfolio at ~$6M. | | So much for "poor people fighting back" LOL. | neuronic wrote: | What kind of shitposting is this? That dude is one out of god | knows how many. | jdmoreira wrote: | I'm not sure the HN crowd appreciates his style on this picture. | I love me a bandana and am known to use some ironic wolf tee once | in a while. I felt so inspired when I saw the photo and am not | even joking. | raziel2701 wrote: | On wsb u/deepfuckingvalue showed he still holds 50,000 shares and | 500 deep ITM call options. He has secured a profit of $13.8 | million dollars, and his remaining open position is valued at $45 | million. | | I would caution people to not quickly fall into the "if he's | still in, I'm still in" meme. He has secured a $14 million bag, | regardless if the stock goes to zero he's already secured a life | changing amount of money, he can afford to weather the storm. If | you're holding because he's still in and you haven't taken any | profits you are nowhere near in the same position as him. | | A hodling mania has overtaken the subreddit that would make btc | blush. Know that we don't know what kind of deals are happening | behind closed doors in these two last days of manipulated | activity. A sustained short interest does not necessarily mean | that the shorts are holding their initial position, they could | have closed and reopened at these elevated levels. | | The narrative has changed so quickly from this being a value | play, to a short squeeze, to now militant activism via buying | stock as a means to sticking it to the man. The rhetoric is as | volatile as the price. The overall market is stressed, things are | getting weird and I would not be surprised if this is the | beginning of another stock market crash. | acover wrote: | Couldn't those with shorts buy otm calls to hedge the | possibility of a squeeze? | cecilpl2 wrote: | OTM calls are super expensive because the IV is through the | roof (it has been over 700% most of the week). | tootie wrote: | It says as much in the article. He literally just thought GME | was undervalued on its merits. He had no intention of creating | a squeeze or punishing Melvin. | ggggtez wrote: | Just because he's still in doesn't mean that it's actually | worth $300 on the fundamentals. I could definitely see the | argument that $20 was undervalued, but it's plain to see that | the short-squeeze is now part of the calculation of value. | | There is no way that GameStop has an _actual_ fundamental | value of $300 per share. That price is clearly inflated, and | in a few weeks will decrease, probably to somewhere above | $20, but not that much higher. The market will eventually | correct, but $300 is an over-correction for sure. | hehehaha wrote: | The guy struck rich! Same with people who shorted crude last | year when it went straight to -40. Billions were made. | sumedh wrote: | > He had no intention of creating a squeeze | | If I am not mistaken he did say in one of his videos that | there is a chance for a squeeze to happen. | ggggtez wrote: | I believe this is CYA (cover your ass) language. Given the | recent interest in the case, he's likely saying now that he | didn't intend to (or that even if he intended to, he didn't | think it was within his power) as a pre-emptive defense | against litigation. | cblconfederate wrote: | ... and if bitcoin is any guide, people can hodl forever, | bacause they are no longer doing it blindly. Who will blink | first? | dcolkitt wrote: | The difference is the supply of bitcoin is fixed. Whereas a | company can issue shares at any time. Obviously if the market | cap stays at $30 billion for a long time, Gamestop management | is going to start spending their overvalued stock like | drunken sailors. | | First it'll be just to plug up the money their operations are | constantly losing. Then they'll start going on acquisition | sprees, giving out giant compensation packages, get into | empire building. Maybe they'll buy a movie studio or a Vegas | casino. That's a constant supply of new stock that will keep | pushing down the price. | | AMC already took advantage of the meme madness by selling a | huge chunk of shares to lock in some cash. That's why AMC | didn't moon like GME. But give it a week or two, and GME's | board will pretty much be forced to do the same thing. | rcoveson wrote: | > Know that we don't know what kind of deals are happening | behind closed doors in these two last days of manipulated | activity. | | As the saying goes: If you're at a poker table and you can't | tell who's the fish, get up. You're the fish. | MuffinFlavored wrote: | A ton of people aren't doing any thinking for themselves. I'm | pretty convinced there's some kind of organized manipulation | attack going on within r/wsb. | | The same reason Parler got taken down for inciting violence | without proper moderation, I'm seeing a lot of baseless claims | from literally millions of people who do not understand how | large/complex the financial systems at play are. | | I'm kind of worried Reddit could shut down r/wsb because of the | amount of influential misinformation being spread. | yreg wrote: | Reddit admins have been rather supportive of | WallStreetBets[0], even helping the mods with special | technical support and tooling to handle the load of users. | They seem to have a good relationship. | | Also kn0thing endorsed yesterday. He's no longer officially | affiliated with reddit, but it still says something. | | [0] https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l7yc12/w | sb_... | dylanz wrote: | There is no misinformation in there. It's average people | buying, and the market is doing its thing. The eye-opening | part of this is how brokerages like Robinhood are reacting. | sumedh wrote: | > I'm pretty convinced there's some kind of organized | manipulation attack going on within r/wsb | | Do you have any proof for that? If not then arent you the one | who is spreading misinformation? | ggggtez wrote: | I personally won't go as far as the grandposter here, but | I'd be at least skeptical of any investment advice from | random internet people. | | Even if this instance is not manipulation, I'm sure there | are people on wsb that do try to make money through | manipulating each other. I think that's just the nature of | the internet in general. | Grimm1 wrote: | I think this is sound advice. I still have some in, but I | locked in gains such that if I lost anything still in I'd still | be well up. | yreg wrote: | Well if a stock market crash triggered by this is realistic | (which I agree is), doesn't it make sense to hold a bit of GME | for insurance? | | I understand that there's no guarantee one will be able to exit | it successfully even if it flies so high that it crashes the | market. However I don't see a better insurance for people who | don't have access to options/inverse etfs and don't want to | sell their stocks. | afterburner wrote: | > Well if a stock market crash triggered by this is realistic | (which I agree is), doesn't it make sense to hold a bit of | GME for insurance | | What is the reasoning here? Are you under the impression GME | wouldn't crash right alongside the market? This isn't BTC or | gold we're talking about. It's just another stock. | yreg wrote: | Presumably the crash would occur after the GME price | skyrockets and shorts (and then their brokers and clearing | houses) go broke trying to close the short positions. | | The insurance pays up _if_ they buy your share. | | Do you have another idea how it could end? | SpicyLemonZest wrote: | It could end by simply crashing without shorts going | broke. There's not much reason to believe a larger short | squeeze is forthcoming. | yreg wrote: | Why would that crash the entire stock market? | leadingthenet wrote: | > Are you under the impression GME wouldn't crash right | alongside the market? | | Well ... yeah. Today it hasn't. | rzz3 wrote: | That seems like sound logic to me. GME has been a vortex this | week sucking up value from the rest of the market. Seems | smart for the next few days/week at least until we learn | otherwise. | tinyhouse wrote: | The problem for GME is that it will crash regardless if | there's stock market crash or not. When a market crash | happens you're much better off holding value stocks of solid | companies. | | As of mr. DFV, I'm sure he'd like to close his position at | the current price. But my guess is that he prefers to hold | for his reputation. Since he already guaranteed more money | than he would ever need, it's not a bad decision. The other | option is that he believes it's going climb even more, which | is possible. But don't assume people hold for any reason | other than making money. Once the squeeze is over it will | fall like dominoes. | redkoala wrote: | This isn't really the place for financial advice. Matt Levine | does publish a newsletter that attempts to unpack the | GameStop Reddit mania situation and what it means for the | retail investors piling on. | delaaxe wrote: | You can always place limit sell orders ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-01-29 23:00 UTC)