[HN Gopher] Die Shots of the Raspberry Pi RP2040 ___________________________________________________________________ Die Shots of the Raspberry Pi RP2040 Author : mmastrac Score : 204 points Date : 2021-01-29 15:23 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (twitter.com) (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com) | mmastrac wrote: | Alternative Twitter thread: | https://twitter.com/johndmcmaster/status/1355092011829719046 | jacquesm wrote: | Yes, much better, thank you. (I made the same suggestion) | dang wrote: | Ok, we'll change to that from | https://blog.adafruit.com/2021/01/29/die-shots-of-the- | raspbe.... Thanks! | breck wrote: | Oh wow this thread (and his whole Twitter account) is gold. | thanks for sharing. | | Edit: this zoomable image is great | (https://siliconpr0n.org/map/raspberry-pi/rp2-b0/mz_mit20x/#x...) | jacquesm wrote: | Why not link to the original thread instead? | | https://twitter.com/johndmcmaster/status/1355092011829719046 | dang wrote: | Changed from https://blog.adafruit.com/2021/01/29/die-shots-of- | the-raspbe.... Thanks! | AbraKdabra wrote: | How does one of those die get made at all? It's such a minuscule | small scale and it has such detail I cannot even comprehend how | those components get "stamped" there, it's black magic. | swalsh wrote: | It's not really "Stamped". It's more of a photographic process. | My basic understanding is that they apply a photographic | reactive chemical, expose it. From there they apply another | chemical process to form an oxidation layer, and then use an | acid process to "etch" away material creating channels of | positively charged particles. Then they can apply a mask, and | throw tiny amounts of metal which will become the gate. | geerlingguy wrote: | The process of photolithography [1] involves a lot of complex | optics, and interestingly you find a lot of lens | manufacturers involved in it since it involves a lot of steps | where light (e.g. lasers in this case) gets passed through a | set of very precise optics until it hits the wafer and etches | in the correct pattern from a larger 'reference copy'. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photolithography | baybal2 wrote: | Actually, the process of actually "stamping" ICs mechanically | is being pursued to make IC production even more cheaper. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanoimprint_lithography | kube-system wrote: | Extremely simplified answer: | | You know how a microscope makes a small image really big? You | can also do the same in reverse -- take a big picture and | project it really small. Use that idea to project your design | on to your silicon, coated in a series of photosensitive | chemicals that etch away the silicon until you have what you | want. | acomjean wrote: | From my partner who used to work at a fabless semiconductor: | | The chipmaking process starts with code. Veralog I think is | still being used. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verilog | | You get information from your fab (libraries about sizes of | things so you can do layouts and simulation with very expensive | software (https://www.synopsys.com) (fun exercise, try to get a | price on their website...) | | Often you send your design to the fab to get some samples to | test back. | | Wikipedia has a decent summary about how the chips are made | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_device_fabricati... | pjc50 wrote: | It is "just" photo-etching, with the big wrinkle that 40nm is | way below the wavelength of light, so all sorts of clever | tricks with diffraction have to be done to make it work. | MarkusWandel wrote: | A quick google for "homemade integrated circuit" brings up | | http://sam.zeloof.xyz/first-ic/ | | At the very primitive end of the technology, integrated | circuits can be made in the home workshop. | auxym wrote: | I like this animation showing how a FET is fabricated using | photolithography processes: | https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/electromag/java/transistor/inde... | blcArmadillo wrote: | Thanks for sharing! It was really nice seeing each step of | the process with a visualization. | MuffinFlavored wrote: | cheap microcontrollers: | | ESP32: WiFI, no USB | | RP2040: USB, no WiFi | | :( | jesse_cureton wrote: | The "Arduino Nano RP2040 Connect" is an RP4040 board slated to | be coming soon that will provide WiFi and Bluetooth. | | I expect we'll see more RP2040 devboards & SOMs coming soon | that fill the connectivity niche. | 725686 wrote: | The resistor value captcha at the end of the page is golden. | war1025 wrote: | How do I interact with it? I tried picking the colors, but | nothing I tried did anything. | allenu wrote: | You can drag the slider. Clicking doesn't seem to work. | war1025 wrote: | Doesn't work for me on Firefox. | | I'm guessing it works on Chrome, but it also would sort of | surprise me that a maker website wouldn't test against | Firefox. Maybe I'm giving them too much credit. | drewzero1 wrote: | It took me a minute to figure out, you have to drag the | circle up and down to select the number. I had expected | to drag the whole bar - oops! | | Edit: Also on FF. (85.0 on Linux) | allenu wrote: | Strange. I'm on Firefox and it works for me. | jsmith45 wrote: | I'm suprised that even the CPU cores are implemented just as a | sea of standard cells. It is common to have them be macros | containing a clearly separate datapath and control logic. | | On the other hand, the fact that the prototyping was done on an | FPGA makes this less surprising. Sea of cells is certainly easier | to update, and less work than any form of manual datapath when | migrating from FPGA to ASIC. | mlyle wrote: | Yup. This is pretty clearly a case of getting it to run on an | FPGA and using a commercial FPGA to ASIC service instead of | spending a lot of time in synthesis and validation. | | Mask costs can be cheaper this way, too, because some layers | can be invariant between different parts. | ohazi wrote: | > using a commercial FPGA to ASIC service | | This was not an FPGA conversion. | | "Commercial FPGA to ASIC service" usually refers to | Altera/Intel's HardCopy or Xilinx's EasyPath. EasyPath is | where Xilinx sells you defective FPGAs for way cheaper, but | with just enough of the right parts of the fabric working | that your design can still fit and work properly. HardCopy is | where Altera sells you a small number of metal mask layers to | implement your design on a much smaller/faster sea-of-gates | style ASIC that mimics the non-reprogrammable parts of the | target FPGA. | | The Raspberry Pi Foundation did neither of these things. They | _tested_ their design on an FPGA, which is common, and then | used standard cell libraries and IP blocks provided by the | fab and their partners to get through the _normal_ ASIC | workflow. | | It turns out it's just easier and faster to tell the tools to | automatically place and route the core complex than to do a | careful floorplan. Also given that the RP2040 is apparently | "very overclockable" (the PIO bitbanged HDMI output bumped | the clock to something like double the nominally guaranteed | maximum), the merits of doing it this way seem sound. | 0xTJ wrote: | Interestingly, there are documented bits in registers for | marking whether you're running on an FPGA or as an ASIC. | [deleted] | myself248 wrote: | How common is it to use copper bondwires? I thought these were | always gold. | samstave wrote: | One of my regrets from when I worked at Intel was that we had die | plans on 36x48 printouts in the lab - and they were beautiful, I | wish I had taken them home - I would love to have some framed on | my walls now. | dboreham wrote: | Interesting. I did not realize wire bonding is still used on | large devices. | tomcam wrote: | Not a big fan of Twitter but I have to say it was an amazing use | of the medium. | mobilio wrote: | Attention to detail is amazing! | mbreese wrote: | From the twitter thread, someone said it was fabbed by TSMC at | 40nm. | | I wonder, with the cutting edge moving to smaller and smaller | processes (5nm, etc)... how much of the older/larger capacity can | be reused? Meaning, are we about to see a ton of cheaper chips | like this RP2040 that are using older/slower/obsolete fab | capacity? Or is the same equipment able to be used across a | family of process sizes? | | In other words, once TSMC has X amount of capacity on 40nm, is | that capacity always around and fixed to 40nm? If so, I imagine | that creating new chips that don't need to be super fast will | just become super cheap. | baybal2 wrote: | > how much of the older/larger capacity can be reused? | | Not only reused, but expanded, and improved over the years. | | So more than 100% of the original. | | The biggest surprise of the last few years was the growth in | really, really old 200mm fab capacity (late eighties, early | nineties tech.) | lizknope wrote: | The fab will eventually be upgraded. I design semiconductors | and I have worked at two companies that had their own fabs (I | didn't work in the fab) | | Back in 1997 the new technology was 0.25 micron (250nm) but we | still operated fabs at 0.35, 0.6, 0.8, and 1 micron. I believe | these 4 lines operated at 6 different factories. | | The next year we shut down the 1 micron fab. The building | itself still had all the air filtering and cleanroom | facilities. The old equipment (steppers, testers) was removed | and new equipment for 0.18 micron was installed. I think this | took about a year. At the end we still had 6 factories but the | building that used to have all the old stuff was now the | cutting edge fab. | bobsmooth wrote: | What happens to the old equipment? Scrap? | peterburkimsher wrote: | Usually the equipment is rented, and returned to the | owners. I spent 4 years in Taiwan working for OSE, a | semiconductor packaging company (cutting up silicon wafers, | bonding wires onto them, and putting them into little | plastic SD cards or RAM chips labelled "Made in Taiwan"). | | The pick & place machines and ovens weren't owned by OSE - | they were on a 30-year lease from other companies in Japan, | Germany, etc. | | Software updates would void the warranty/lease conditions. | One of my tasks was to write a program to measure yields | for factory monitoring. This meant figuring out how to use | SQL on Windows 2000, with no .NET framework or additional | libraries. | | My guess is that when the equipment is too old, the | original owners either take them back for salvaging, or | sell off the pieces as scrap. I went to many scrapyards in | Kaohsiung though, and found many treasures like $10 | bicycles or old consumer gadgets, but no factory-level | machines. | TorKlingberg wrote: | Older processes available for cheap are not a new thing. They | do indeed stay around until TSMC decide they're no longer worth | running. It's not always cheaper as a larger process wastes | more wafer. | geerlingguy wrote: | I believe Eben Upton mentioned in a Twitter thread somewhere | that they were getting thousands of chips off each wafer at | the current node size? Only had to order like 20 or 40 wafers | for the first production run, something like that. | avian wrote: | Microelectronics cutting edge has been moving to smaller | processes for the past 70 years. This is nothing new. If | anything, the progress has slowed down. | | Some fabs get closed down/rebuilt for a different process, some | stay and produce parts that don't benefit from higher | densities. Last I checked some ICs still get produced in 0.35 | um processes. You don't need billions of transistors for an | opamp. | mlyle wrote: | Microcontrollers being on larger processes like this is nothing | new. As you mention, it's a way to keep using older fabs, but | that's not the only reason. | | 40nm offers tons of performance for microcontrollers and the | die area can still be reasonably small. You tend to want to | have lots of variants of microcontrollers for different | applications, so mask costs matter. And you tend not to want | exotic, very low core voltages and _do_ want high voltage | tolerances and strong drivers on the IOs, which mean relatively | big geometry-- no matter what your minimum feature size is. | | Also, sleep power consumption is important, so low leakage is | nice, which is easier to get on large geometry. | baybal2 wrote: | 40nm is a quite recent move for MCUs, and the mainstream | majority can still be anywhere in between 90nm, and 180nm. | | Only very few, top of the line MCUs ventured to 40nm, like | ESP32 which had no other option because of WiFi eating gates, | or ST's MCUs with 3D accelerator on board. | | Problem for MCUs is that MCU specific features start to cost | too much more in IP, design time, yields, and fab service | cost below 90nm. Things like embedded flash, per-model mask | memory, SRAM, non-CMOS cells, RF, and other analogue | circuitry. | | Below 28nm conventional eFlash, and many other things stop | scaling, and only proprietary solutions are on the table at | the moment. | petra wrote: | BayBal, since you're an expert in Semi, I wonder if you can | fill in the blanks? | | EbenUpton(Raspberry Pi's CEO) , on Twitter:"We get ~20k die | per wafer"" | | A Tsmc 40nm wafer costs about $2300. | | How much do you estimate the full chip manufacturing cost | for this would be ? | | I wonder, because Eben Upton talked about "business model | hacking" in regards to this chip, so they may want to do | some interesting stuff in the mcu market. | zeckalpha wrote: | In the docs they described the naming convention for the | processor, which suggests there are more under | development | swalsh wrote: | For how long is the equipment for these fabs amortized? | baybal2 wrote: | All eternity really. Even eighties era equipment is still | being bought, and resold. Quite a number of early nineties | fabs still work producing pretty much same things for 30 | years straight. | VectorLock wrote: | Its easy to forget the long tail of smaller ICs these will | get use out of for generations. | monocasa wrote: | Not long, around five years after full production. | lmilcin wrote: | This chip is very small and it does not benefit in any possible | way from more advanced technological process. And using more | advanced process means additional drawbacks and cost increases. | teruakohatu wrote: | I think it is safe to say they will come out with a WiFi | version. The 40nm will be beneficial then. | breck wrote: | A simple stack of these images with a CSS offset (to give it a | 3-d look) would be great. | | Edit: his zoomable image is even better | (https://siliconpr0n.org/map/raspberry-pi/rp2-b0/mz_mit20x/#x...) | rwmj wrote: | How do you change the layer? | teraflop wrote: | If you navigate up one directory, there are a couple more | layers available: https://siliconpr0n.org/map/raspberry- | pi/rp2-b0/ ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-01-29 23:00 UTC)