[HN Gopher] Google News Showcase Launches in Australia ___________________________________________________________________ Google News Showcase Launches in Australia Author : caution Score : 22 points Date : 2021-02-04 21:42 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (blog.google) (TXT) w3m dump (blog.google) | joecot wrote: | So is this Google trying to navigate around Australia's proposed | changes, or did Google blink and decide not to pull out? | jb_s wrote: | 50/50? I _think_ this first step is Google going "fuck you, | we'll create our own curated news service and we'll pay a bunch | of independent media on our own terms". But it's still probably | just a matter of time until it's murdoch wall-to-wall | jimmcslim wrote: | I'm not sure of the details but apparently our Prime Minister, | Scott Morrison, had a "fruitful discussion" with Google | yesterday... | dhsysusbsjsi wrote: | The Australian PM is from a marketing background so there's a | fair chance the deal changed so Australian tax payers are now | paying Google to pay Murdoch media. | firecall wrote: | The whole thing is corrupt nonsense. | | Morrison has been in Murdochs pocket his entire career. | | It's shamless corruption that is damaging Australian | Domocracy and our reputation. | chrismsimpson wrote: | Good thing google aren't evil | kentosi wrote: | If you're referring to Google's old motto "Don't be | evil", then FYI that got dropped years ago: | https://gizmodo.com/google-removes-nearly-all-mentions- | of-do... | fggg444 wrote: | no one has a monopoly on being evil. both players can be | wrong | tamrix wrote: | Do you have a source for this claim or is this just | speculation? | pulposus wrote: | This is an interesting development in that the news services they | have signed seem to be those not owned by Murdoch, i.e. left- | leaning Fairfax and Schwartz Media mastheads. This could be about | making sure the first people to make some money out of this are | the competitors of those asking for it. | siquick wrote: | Fairfax is definitely not left leaning anymore, they're owned | by Nine Entertainment which was strong ties to the Liberal | government. | | "AUSTRALIA'S MEDIA is more concentrated than in some countries | that are under dictatorships, such as Turkey and Russia. The | ownership and management of practically all of Australia's | print and television media, with exception to Network 10, have | links to the Liberal Party. News Corp, chaired by Rupert | Murdoch and majority-owned by the Murdoch family, owns around | two-thirds of the print media and is a majority stakeholder in | Foxtel and Sky News. | | Nine Entertainment, which was established by the Liberal-linked | Packer family and is chaired by former Liberal member Peter | Costello, owns the Nine Network, about a third of Australia's | newspaper publications and subscription television service | Stan. Seven West Media, which is majority-owned and chaired by | Kerry Stokes, another Liberal supporter, owns Channel 7 and any | major newspaper publications that are not owned by News Corp or | the Nine Entertainment. | | Ita Buttrose, another person with links to the Liberal Party, | is chairperson of the ABC. Although most of Australia's media | is owned and run by Liberal supporters, there have been times | when Australia's media wasn't biased." | | https://independentaustralia.net/business/business-display/t... | mrcsharp wrote: | This sounds like a way for google to control who gets publish | news articles across their services where google will select the | sources they like. | | So basically if google doesn't like your organization, you don't | get a place on this platform. Of course, it is their platform so | this is within their rights, but I don't feel comfortable with | google getting to promote some news sources over others based on | arbitrary criteria. This is problematic when considering the size | of audience google can reach. | bpodgursky wrote: | Australia is to blame for this whole saga. | | You can fault Google in a hundred other places, but this is | 100% on Murdoch and the Australian gov for forcing Google into | a corner where they could not display neutral results. | valleyjo wrote: | This is a great point. It's a conversation about the place | these companies should hold in our lives, in democracy and | their ability to control information. I wish people would admit | that directly and focus on that discussion. | | Instead I see unproductive and backward conversations saying | that google should pay publishers when in fact google brings | more value to publishers via clicks than publishers bring to | google. This line of thinking is missing the primary | implications in my opinion. | dang wrote: | The recent-and-related threads on this (there are a lot of them) | can be accessed via | https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... | shruubi wrote: | It reads to me as though Google blinked. I'm sure somewhere, | Rupert Murdoch is popping champagne bottles paid for by his ever | increasing media in the Australian media bubble. | Clewza313 wrote: | I'm not seeing any Murdoch rags listed in the article though? | abraae wrote: | Google had to blink sooner or later. It would be a loss for | them if they were blocked from the Aussie market and other | alternatives like Bing, DDG became popular. | | That could lead to a dominoes scenario where other countries | realised they could get by too without the mighty Google. | | Those of us that need Google for searching for weird code | snippets and the like (though Google seems increasingly failing | in the battle against SEO spam) could just use a US VPN. Most | people would get by fine on DDG. | kindofajsdev wrote: | This is my take as well. Google will sooner run at a loss in | certain countries if it means not giving other competitors so | much as an inch. Ads are their kingdom. They will protect it | at all costs, even if that is giving up some revenue. | | What I am waiting to see next is, how will other | countries/industries respond? Some countries may institute | the same thing as Australia. Other industries may try to take | a cut as well. | nojs wrote: | Google's PR on this whole thing is a mess. There's no explanation | of how this fits in to their previous ads and videos that | threatened to pull search from Australia. And even that was badly | explained. I wish they would pick a stance and clearly say what | they mean. | jb_s wrote: | There's also no link to the bloody thing anywhere! | | Great launch. | 22c wrote: | Google threatening to pull search from Australia was the most | obvious bluff I've ever seen from any company. A total | embarrassment, everyone saw right through it. | hiisukun wrote: | So how do I (as an Aussie) use it, or see it? | | I couldn't find a link in the annoucement blog post. So I Googled | for "Google News showcase" but.. no link there. Maybe I had to | click the "news" tab/link above the search results- but nope, | this just shows me the old style results, articles one after the | other. | | Maybe it's an app? I searched the playstore, but only saw "Google | news" which isn't updated since 15 Jan. I gave it a go anyway, | but it didn't show the Showcase style anything like the blog | post. | | Makes me think maybe this isn't really for the users. | bjowen wrote: | Meaning no shade, since this has probably been launched on a | moment's notice, but the current list of publications isn't that | impressive - none of the big names are there, half are subscriber | paywalled, and the Conversation is a Creative Commons enterprise; | I don't think their funding model relies on this kind of traffic. | | Listed are: The Canberra Times, The Illawarra Mercury, The | Saturday Paper, Crikey, The New Daily, InDaily and The | Conversation. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-02-04 23:00 UTC)