[HN Gopher] 78rpm Records Digitized ___________________________________________________________________ 78rpm Records Digitized Author : Tomte Score : 93 points Date : 2021-02-13 14:54 UTC (8 hours ago) (HTM) web link (archive.org) (TXT) w3m dump (archive.org) | reaperducer wrote: | Since the kids are all about sea shanties these days: | | https://archive.org/details/78_rio-grande_leonard-warren-tom... | pp19dd wrote: | Thank you! Has one of the best renditions of 'drunken sailor.' | samstave wrote: | Thank you for this! | | I had a TON of classic Jazz 78s from my grandfather - | unfortunately I couldnt find a 78 player at the time for the | life of me - and I gave them to a friend who was a really | accomplished Jazz drummer in SF - one of my biggest regrets - | but they were so heavy and I didnt have space for them when I | moved... | Gregordinary wrote: | The title sparked a memory of someone using a flatbed scanner and | some software back in 2002 to extract audio from scanned images | of record tracks. | | https://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~springer/DigitalNeedle/index.html | | Results were interesting though fairly unintelligible. | Practicality aside, wonder if/how much this method could be | improved today? | rvnx wrote: | I try to understand how this is legal ? I mean: what is the | difference between Archive.org and any other torrent website ? | | Aren't they both preserving the culture ? | | Archive.org is doing 20M USD in revenue, lot of people are | getting paid in the process, and suppliers as well, it's not like | they are working for nothing. They just don't have investors (but | can have big salaries). | | Genuinely wondering because I saw that you can download games | there too (and some are still under commercial exploitation). | SeeManDo wrote: | Ssshh! | rvnx wrote: | ? | MaxBarraclough wrote: | I think they're agreeing with you. There's no obvious | reason this should be considered fair use. | | Last time I checked, Archive.org also host ROMs of various | copyrighted Nintendo games. Nintendo are famously litigious | so I'm not sure how long that is likely to continue. | Black101 wrote: | https://archive.org/details/78_west-end-blues_louis-armstron... | Isamu wrote: | Thank you for posting! I immediately found some old 78's that I | had lost, it's great to listen to them again. | aeontech wrote: | I hope someone can put Internet Archive and Zero Freitas in touch | with eachother. Zero is a businessman that has been buying up | vinyl collections and archiving them in Brazil, amassing an | enormous archive. | | https://thevinylfactory.com/features/inside-the-worlds-bigge... | textfiles wrote: | We are very aware of each other. | marcodiego wrote: | Archive.org does a very good job in keeping recent history. I | love that they have a movie/film collection: | https://archive.org/details/feature_films | css wrote: | The trouble with digitizing analog mediums (especially vinyl) is | how much your equipment can alter the sound. Given a different | tonearm, cartridge, amp, etc, the same record can sound very | different. | | I've had some luck digitizing some of my collection with a DP-450 | [0] and Ortofon Blue [1], but had higher end stuff end up | sounding less interesting to my ears. | | This is the trouble with audio in general: people not only prefer | different sound profiles but also perceive sound differently, | which makes it difficult to get rips (at least in my limited | experience). | | There is a lot of sibilance in the recordings I sampled from the | OP link, whoever did the digitization would have benefitted from | cleaner records, probably an anti-static brush, a fresh | cartridge, and possibly some post-processing since they're | already digital. It's better than nothing, of course, but it | could be a lot better. | | [0] https://www.denon.com/en-us/product/turntables/dp-450usb | | [1] https://www.ortofon.com/ortofon-2m-blue-p-333 | [deleted] | dialamac wrote: | > This is the trouble with audio in general: people not only | prefer different sound profiles but also perceive sound | differently, which makes it difficult to get rips (at least in | my limited experience). | | The problem with worrying about this is that even the same | person perceives sound differently situationally and is simply | not repeatable. In _most_ cases when someone hears a difference | it is often just a change in their perception from one moment | to the next.. and that's even when something measurable has | changed! The bass sounds better because of that new amp.. well | no.. you just happened to focus on it more the second time | around. Longer term people's physiology changes as well. | | Only repeat, blinded A-B testing can clearly elicit an | objective difference that is most likely not due to these | perceptual inconsistencies. | | What does this mean.. record it with decent equipment that | captures as much useful raw information as possible (and yes | 96khz is ridiculous as we're not bats). People can EQ and mix | to their preferences any given day. | | It's not clear there was something wrong with the cartridge. | These are old 78 records.. they weren't mastered with much to | begin with and the useful fidelity in them is limited. If you | want you can post-process them with whatever fancy shit, but I | wouldn't immediately assume the recordings weren't the best | given what they were working with for source material. | tingletech wrote: | not that is changes your point, but 78s are usually shellac | rather than vinyl. | css wrote: | TIL. I only have 45s and 33s. A lot of modern pressings are | 45 RPM on 12" vinyl. | jnurmine wrote: | Perhaps a laser could be used to first reliably replicate the | original pattern of an LP into digital form, then one could | feed that pattern to a real tonearm needle somehow, vibrating | it suitably, in a nondestructive manner. | | Like some kind of "fake vinyl", except the actual musical data | could be downloadable. | | This way one could stream/download vinyls while still playing | the music with all the small imperfections which create warmth | and the vinyl sound (=crackles of noise and static and wow and | flutter and the harmonic distortions and so on). | gruez wrote: | > The trouble with digitizing analog mediums (especially vinyl) | is how much your equipment can alter the sound. Given a | different tonearm, cartridge, amp, etc, the same record can | sound very different. | | Would a scan done with a laser turntable[1] be better? The | wikipedia article mentions that it produces a much better | capture than regular tonearms, although they are much more | susceptible to dust. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_turntable | fuzzfactor wrote: | It's the equalization that had the kids thinking 78 was so | obsolete & bad sounding compared to our 45's and the upcoming | 33's back in the early 1960's. | | Naturally it was all the fault of the RIAA. | | By that time almost all new record players had the recent | RIAA standard equalization built in, by compensation in the | audio playback circuit based on the published RIAA | engineering standard which had emerged. | | Otherwise the 45's & 33's would have sounded nasty themselves | since way less bass frequencies could be represented | mechanically by the analog carving of the signal into the | _microgrooves_ of the more-compact discs and not as many | highs could be recovered at the slower playing speeds. | | Compared to 78's which had plenty of space between the | grooves since there was only one tune per side. | | When they first tried to track smaller grooves more closely | to get more tunes on a disc, the playback needle would jump | out of the groove if more bass frequencies were not removed | relative to 78's, before cutting the groove. | | So almost all vintage record players which have speeds for | 33, 45 & 78 [which is almost all of them] play everything | through the RIAA circuit, so the 33 & 45 sound correctly | equalized but the 78's are miserable because of the EQ even | though they are turning at the right speed. | | So 78's always sounded lousy since the beginning for me and | everyone younger, even including a number of years older, and | I was already a critical listener before The Beatles started | making records. | | 78's had never been able to contain the full analog level of | bass either, so their equalization had been engineered by | each record company as best they could based on their | advances in materials & electronics as the 78's were | developed and had become popular. But there was no real | standard and each record company made occasional improvements | over the decades of 78 dominance. | | To begin with a record album was a boxed set of these single- | tune-per-side 78 records. | | Then came the RIAA and an industry-agreed standard for | equalization so popular music could continue to be | distributed in audio form at prevailing prices on 45's & | 33's, but at a cost of pressing closer to sheet music than 78 | albums. | | Plus there was going to be stereophonic sound with each | channel on either side of the microgroove, fully compatible | with monophonic by nature. Stereo 78's were never going be an | actual thing, they had always been mono. | | After RIAA, single 45's replaced the single 78, and 33's | replaced the multi-78 albums with a single full-size disc. | | Anyway by the time the 1990's came around I decided to do | something about the EQ thing. | | Firstly studying RIAA compensation using plenty of vintage 33 | & 45 vinyl, as well as numerous other-peoples-circuits, then | fully pursuing the NIH approach as if it had never been done | before. | | Numerous AM/FM/Turntable/8-Track combo players were being | finally discarded, and they had come from various price- | points in design & manufacturing, some very expensive | consoles. A few times I was able to use a Dremel to simply | saw out the audio portion of the PCB for testing, then later | trim out only the RIAA sub-section for further testing in an | otherwise all-reference rig. | | Music CD's were already more popular than ever, so next had | to design a flat analog circuit having less noise than a CD | can reproduce. Could then fully confirm the best results | would not be obtained using CD versions as references. | | Then adding only passive components made my RIAA curve out of | it. | | Simply eating away at my excess gain & headroom willy-nilly | compared to what I had seen and it came out great. Some EE's | will probably relate to the math involved to select RIAA | component values. The proof is in the testing. Much more | testing than math & soldering. | | Then came the 78's and no more math, just soldering & | testing. | | Sure had gotten a lot of pattern recognition done by then | though, this was by design. | | It was assumed the RIAA curve had been adapted from previous | but disparate 78 EQ curves, so that was attempted to be | reversed. | | The best references were the ones by Elvis, Bing Crosby, | Chuck Berry and a few other very popular artists who had | simultaineously released new singles on 45 & 78 even after | everyone knew 78's wouldn't be available for most releases | after a number more years. | | Some of the tunes could also be heard in vintage movies where | they had sounded as intended, rather than ugly like 78's | played on a late 1950's 60's or 70's turntable always did. | | With numerous classical from US and Europe, some jazz, show | tunes, pipe organ, and of course the 1812 Overture to go | along with the pop music, another trend thought necessary was | to make sure the Deccas came out good at the same time as the | Capitols since they were often more numerous at the time. | | During this reiterative process the best styluses could be | selected. | | When all was said & done what made people's jaw drop was The | Tennessee Waltz by Les Paul & Mary Ford. | | This was so popular a hit that the previous owner had | obviously left it on their heavy-arm original 78 player for | at least hundreds of plays, collecting little dust between | plays but still the total amount of dust expected over that | period of time. The music was about halfway scratched out of | the groove and it was ugly :-( | | Apparently they had never played the other side of the record | though, it didn't have any words to the song anyway and you | couldn't even dance to it at all. Record companies would | never put a popular song (or even ones having popular | potential) on _both sides_ of the record, and Paul & Ford | had already been on the air a lot. Nope, this was just Les | Paul solo picking on some experimental electronic techniques | at the time, using his own handmade equipment like nobody | else had either. | | This was also the harder phenolic pre-vinyl, vintage vinyl | never sounded that good, even through the audiophile excesses | of the '70's. | | :-...\\. | mjcohen wrote: | Wow! There's a book in here, waiting to be written. | intc wrote: | Here's a short video clip from ELP (Japan): | https://youtu.be/W_4sooWCh_Y. | csnover wrote: | I was wondering the same thing! For the dust problem, I'd | like to imagine that the machines could be modified with an | air pump to blow away anything ahead of the pickup. One | probably wouldn't want that extra noise in a listening room, | but for archiving, it wouldn't matter. | | I guess when you can get a 'good enough' traditional | turntable for a couple hundred bucks but an ELP laser | turntable costs over $14,000[0] the economics just don't make | a lot of sense. I wonder how much the IRENE systems cost. | | [0] https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=elp+turnta | ble... | dialamac wrote: | Old 78 records were produced with equipment from recording to | cutting and pressing that is long since obsolete. Even if you | overcome the challenges of dealing with laser equipment | (dust, tracking).. what extra information are you really | getting?. that it is useful signal more than even a dB or two | above the noise I think is very wishful thinking. | soneil wrote: | You might be interested to dig deeper around the archive and | see what they're doing. Each record is transferred using four | different styli, and then an engineer at GB picks which | recording to use as the example - but all four are in the | archive. | | They have a video up about the process too - | https://archive.org/details/mass78rpmdiscdigitization | doodlebugging wrote: | I wish I had not sold my 78's to Half Price Books a few years | back. I had a couple hundred records, some of which had probably | never been played. I found all of them in a house we bought right | after getting married. | | They were a mix of old Country music, Broadway musical shows, | Jewish songs, and Big Band stuff. I always intended to digitize | them before selling them but my phonograph only played 33 1/3 rpm | and 45 rpm and had no facility for direct recording so everything | had to be done through a connection to my pc. | | I bought a USB interface to a phonograph and recorded about 40 of | my albums and some that I bought at Half Price Books because I | really wanted a particular song. After recording each album, I | used Audacity to compensate for the speed difference and was able | to get some great music. | | It was a huge project though and I was working 7 days a week | during this period so the spare time to complete it was just not | available. That is why I decided to take them to Half Price | Books. I knew that I would get almost nothing for them and that | there was likely some very good music in the collection but I | decided that there was a better chance for someone else to see | them on the racks and tackle the job. | | I love old music. It takes me back to my childhood in the same | way that a smell can transport me to a specific point in time. | I'm glad that someone has chosen to preserve this music in an | accessible format and to make it available so others can hear | those timeless compositions. | | Support archive.org if you have the resources. | justin66 wrote: | > I wish I had not sold my 78's to Half Price Books a few years | back. I had a couple hundred records, some of which had | probably never been played. | | How much did you get for them? I assume HPB puts almost all 78s | in the dumpster. | doodlebugging wrote: | I knew going in that I wouldn't get much so I was not | surprised to end up with a only few dollars which I spent on | books for the kids. At the same time I also sold them a bunch | of books so the records and books were co-mingled money. I | know that HPB has always had a good selection of 78s on the | shelves and that is why I took them. Hopefully they were able | to send them to a store where someone could buy and enjoy | them. | | I also have a large collection of vinyl albums from the late | 60's through the mid-80's that I tried to sell/give to a | well-known local record shop in FtWorth. They wouldn't touch | my albums or 45s and told me that most albums have no real | value. This, in spite of the fact that their entire store was | wall-to-wall used albums. They recently moved to a new | building with a lot more floor space and their store has | become a lot more like a HPB in that you can get memorabilia, | posters, junk and crap along with your used albums. Pretty | funny actually. | hubrix wrote: | Is apples lidar resolution good enough to scan an LP? | supernova87a wrote: | I was thinking that this would've been really cool if they'd | scanned the grooves with a laser to get the exact sound without | the analog needle noise/imprecision. But I guess it's basically | what I thought -- output from a record player in digital form. | Which, I mean, is fine. | jrowley wrote: | Parker Higgens made a really cool Twitter bot using this project, | which creates a little clip of a random record playing: | | https://twitter.com/78_sampler?s=21 | thisisparker wrote: | Thank you for sharing! If folks are interested in the code that | powers the bot (it uses OpenCV to find the label, then draws | frames and animates with ffmpeg) it's available here: | https://github.com/thisisparker/78_sampler | textfiles wrote: | This story has made the top of Hackernews before, but it's always | appreciated when people find it. | | For context about the Great 78 project: | | http://great78.archive.org/ | | For the even larger set of 78rpm recording being done: | | https://archive.org/details/78rpm | bjornlouser wrote: | Couldn't find Tchaikovsky's Pathetique with Ormandy conducting... | the one with the interesting artwork | | http://shellackophile.blogspot.com/2015/04/tchaikovsky-symph... | tzury wrote: | This brings me right back to the national treasure Joe Bussard | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPhtR09p6zM | | and many others | | https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=joe+bussard | johtso wrote: | Some previous discussion: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14960597 ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-02-13 23:00 UTC)