[HN Gopher] Has Amazon Ruined the Name Alexa?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Has Amazon Ruined the Name Alexa?
        
       Author : giuliomagnifico
       Score  : 33 points
       Date   : 2021-02-19 21:32 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.statista.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.statista.com)
        
       | eplanit wrote:
       | Alexa now joins Adolph. Those would be perfect names for a fairy
       | tale of evil twins, for sure.
        
       | whoisjuan wrote:
       | Alexa, Karen, Chad...Yours could be next.
        
       | MarkLowenstein wrote:
       | It's certainly become an inconvenient name to utter around our
       | house, due to the responses it elicits from our countertops. So
       | my daughter came up with the idea of referring to the device as
       | "Amelia" whenever we talk about her. It has worked brilliantly
       | and I suggest that everyone adopt the same convention.
        
         | NullPrefix wrote:
         | Or you could just throw away those listening devices.
        
         | cadence- wrote:
         | We use the name Lexi instead.
        
           | justtocomment wrote:
           | It's interesting how we twist our behaviour to accomodate the
           | technology and not the other way around.
           | 
           | What worked great for us was not buying the thing in the
           | first place.
        
             | throw14082020 wrote:
             | Don't worry the wake word will be customizable soon enough;
        
       | jmosbech wrote:
       | Related: Being married to an actual Siri made it easy for us to
       | rule out one of the home automation platforms. (I asked, but
       | somehow she didn't feel like changing her name.)
        
       | withaplomb wrote:
       | Try being called Beavis in the 90s with MTVs show.
        
       | kowlo wrote:
       | Would have been interesting to see data-points from before
       | 2015...
        
         | adjkant wrote:
         | https://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi should do it
        
           | CameronNemo wrote:
           | Is there a way to get the raw percentages rather than the
           | rank?
        
             | smogcutter wrote:
             | Especially once you get outside the top 10 or so, I expect
             | the percentages quickly get very small and very close. Even
             | 5% would make a name astoundingly common. Like, more than
             | one in every classroom common.
        
         | Gys wrote:
         | 'The year when the name Alexa was most popular is 2015. In that
         | year, the number of births is 6052, which represents 0.311
         | percent of total female births in 2015.'
         | 
         | From https://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | CameronNemo wrote:
       | Amazon has ruined the name Amazon.
       | 
       | A word that used to command respect and awe now connotates
       | shipping waste and overworked warehouse laborers.
        
         | dyingkneepad wrote:
         | Not really. If I say "she is an Amazon!" you will think I'm
         | saying she's a female warrior instead of a megacorporation.
        
           | xwdv wrote:
           | Nope, I think of those people wearing the little blue jackets
           | that say Amazon on them packing up boxes or running around
           | grocery stores fetching shopping items.
        
           | kwhitefoot wrote:
           | It would be interesting to know what proportion of the
           | population of which countries would think which.
        
       | vmception wrote:
       | Just a friendly reminder that baby names are adult names.
        
         | Waterluvian wrote:
         | And that children are people and not stylish accessories.
        
       | azurezyq wrote:
       | I think this sentence is kind of BS:
       | 
       | > Having been the 32nd most popular name for girls born in 2015,
       | Alexa's rank dropped to 139th in 2019, the lowest it's been since
       | 1992.
       | 
       | Thanks for the link provided by adjkant below, here's the ranks
       | per year:
       | 
       | 2019 139
       | 
       | 2018 90
       | 
       | 2017 65
       | 
       | 2016 51
       | 
       | 2015 32
       | 
       | 2014 63
       | 
       | 2013 60
       | 
       | 2012 57
       | 
       | 2011 55
       | 
       | 2010 50
       | 
       | 2009 43
       | 
       | 2008 50
       | 
       | 2007 40
       | 
       | 2006 39
       | 
       | 2005 66
       | 
       | 2004 72
       | 
       | 2003 67
       | 
       | 2002 69
       | 
       | 2001 78
       | 
       | 2000 87
       | 
       | I agree that ranks in 2018 and 2019 is low and on point. However
       | 2015 is already an outlier. The sentence doesn't make much sense
       | statistically. It's a bit like picking data points purposefully.
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | Baby name wizard has Alexa peaking in the 1990s when combined
         | with various other related names. [1] The specific Alexa
         | variant peaked in 2015 but that's in the context of the related
         | names as a whole declining precipitously, albeit not to pre-80s
         | levels.
         | 
         | I must admit that a reason for the popularity spike doesn't pop
         | to mind but presumably there's some pop culture thing I'm not
         | thinking of.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://www.babynamewizard.com/voyager#prefix=alexa&sw=both&...
        
           | ldayley wrote:
           | A friend of mine was a big Billy Joel fan and named his child
           | after his song "Downeaster Alexa". This probably accounts for
           | the some of the spike in the 80's as well.
        
           | Tarsul wrote:
           | well maybe there could've been an uptick but Amazon ruined it
           | (or maybe even amazon was responsible for the uptick in
           | 2015?). I know from Germany that short, phonetically nice
           | sounding names are "in" and I'd guess it's similar in the US.
           | Alexa does sound nice, actually. Probably why Amazon took it,
           | even.
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | I assume there are also distinctiveness considerations. I'm
             | guessing the "ex" phoneme is natural to pronounce but not
             | super-common in English. And 3 syllables is probably a good
             | compromise between distinctiveness and being too long.
        
       | mentos wrote:
       | Funny coincidence I was just wondering this a few weeks ago when
       | reading a Tinder bio of a girl named Alexa who had something to
       | the effect of 'heard all the Alexa jokes for a lifetime thanks'
       | 
       | Made me wonder if there is a class action lawsuit where all of
       | the Alexa's could sue Amazon for psychological distress or
       | something.
        
         | ChuckNorris89 wrote:
         | In the German speaking world the name Kevin is ruined, with
         | some men having that name being avoided in the dating scene.
        
           | rblatz wrote:
           | Why is Kevin ruined? Is that what Alexa is called in German?
        
             | 1986 wrote:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevinism
        
         | afavour wrote:
         | I know an Alexa and she says the same. I'll admit I hadn't
         | thought about it before but it does sound like an incredibly
         | annoying thing to have dropped on you from on high: constant
         | jokes, if anyone addresses you in an Amazon-enabled home all
         | kind of crap gets triggered... I can see why people are
         | infuriated by it.
        
           | 8ytecoder wrote:
           | I was in a call with an Alexa on Zoom and every time anyone
           | mentions her name, my Echo would be triggered. I had to go
           | mute Echo for the entire duration.
        
           | echelon wrote:
           | It's like "Karen", but in this case the blame for misuse lies
           | on a single company rather than a meme.
           | 
           | We shouldn't abuse people's names by using them for products,
           | gross generalizations, etc. It's poor taste, and it
           | frequently hurts people unintentionally.
           | 
           | Imagine your own name being used as a term for ridicule or
           | poking fun. It's not a good feeling.
        
             | koolba wrote:
             | > We shouldn't abuse people's names by using them for
             | products, gross generalizations, etc. It's poor taste, and
             | it frequently hurts people unintentionally.
             | 
             | In the case of Alexa and Cortana, the intention is to treat
             | the machine as a person you can talk to. It's intentional
             | that it has a human name.
        
             | camjohnson26 wrote:
             | Chad and Dick too
        
             | williw wrote:
             | Thoughts go to all the Pete out there
        
               | notriddle wrote:
               | I wonder if OJ ever got asked about his cousin Homer?
        
       | adam12 wrote:
       | Yes, and the internet has ruined the name Karen, too.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-02-19 23:00 UTC)