[HN Gopher] 'Deep Nostalgia' can turn old photos of your relativ... ___________________________________________________________________ 'Deep Nostalgia' can turn old photos of your relatives into moving videos Author : DamnInteresting Score : 135 points Date : 2021-02-26 20:16 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (gizmodo.com) (TXT) w3m dump (gizmodo.com) | [deleted] | [deleted] | lostmsu wrote: | This would also work for a scary room in amusement parks. Imagine | Harry Potter-like photos of yourself + previous visitors | screaming and trying to get out of the picture frame. | withinboredom wrote: | Check out my five minute old son looking around. Really weird. | | https://myhr.tg/1O7m77RK | | And these articulated sunglasses. | | https://myhr.tg/1rX4Z8Xs | hashingroll wrote: | Interesting that the AI understands sunglasses but still | "blinks" them like eyes. | SammyNameTaken wrote: | Is it really artificial intelligence and not facial | recognition plus a series of image transforms | ordu wrote: | I would be just like Harry Potter, when it would be possible to | print moving photos on a paper or a wall. With a sound | preferably. I liked the idea of an moving image of Harry Potter | repeatedly saying "Eat dung, Umbridge". Wouldn't it great to | paint a graffiti saying obscene things to a passers-by? Then | you could hide behind bushes and record a video how people | react. Oh, and you could draw another graffiti which might | answer to the first one. The city would become a different | place, I'd stop using internet and start using reality again. | It would be so much fun. Not for a long I expect, then morally | wounded citizens would ban moving graffiti to make world boring | again. But for a few years we could have a lot of fun. And then | move to underground. | axismundi wrote: | Coming soon: generating your favorite movie starring you. | dariosalvi78 wrote: | just tried it with 3 or 4 pictures: some parts of the animation | are convincing, but another good part is just too distorted, the | tool fails to keep the shape of the head, the person becomes | someone else. Good fun tho. | TrackerFF wrote: | A bit OT: But are any big studious (yet) applying some deep | methodology to movie dubbing? | finnh wrote: | I can't be the only one who has thought that deep fakes + Cameo = | moneymaker! Pitch the celebs "hey you can have 70% of the cameo | money, but you don't have to lower yourself to _actually doing | the cameo_". We'll just take the other 30% to pay actors to do it | for you. | pbhjpbhj wrote: | I imagine when processing power doubles a few more times that | we'll be able to do that in real time. Pick your movie, then | pick which actors you want, use your Mii as the next James | Bond, etc.. | minimaxir wrote: | It would be in Cameo's interest to ban deepfakes preemptively | (since devaluing actors, their _primary content creators_ , | would not be wise even moreso if they are unionized), and I'm | honestly surprised they haven't already. | black_puppydog wrote: | I see the next wave of copyright suits coming already: | | > 30-odd geek sued for Billions for infringing on the "Brad | Pitt" brand. | | Interesting times... | mikestew wrote: | Thought about it? There was a movie made along those lines: | | https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1821641/ | breck wrote: | The Prior-Units theorem states that if you can put an idea | into words, there exists prior units in proportion to the | utility of the idea (so there's an infinity of novel but | useless ideas). | | Is there a variant of this along those lines but in regards | to "someone made a movie about this"? | lozaning wrote: | 'Simpsons did it' is as close as I've got. | granularity wrote: | If you like bad movies, this one manages to be bad on a | number of interesting dimensions at the same time. Highly | recommended! | gambiting wrote: | Having read the book, I'm just amazed anyone could have | read it and go "we should make a movie out of this!" And I | love all of Lem's writing. | atdt wrote: | https://mashable.com/article/damian-lillard-hulu-deepfake-co... | siavosh wrote: | Pretty magical, my parents were amazed. | markdown wrote: | Doesn't seem to work on black faces, or faces with beards. | dpoochieni wrote: | I think they can train it for those customers or else it is an | opportunity for an incumbent. | mc32 wrote: | Now take a recorded voice snippet of the same subject and have | them say hello to you or happy birthday, etc. | saurik wrote: | If you are trying to make me cry, I think you are succeeding | :(. | haberman wrote: | Black Mirror comes to life: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Be_Right_Back | | > Martha Powell (Hayley Atwell) and Ash Starmer (Domhnall | Gleeson) are a young couple who have moved to Ash's remote | family house in the countryside. The day after moving in, Ash | is killed while returning the hire van. At the funeral, | Martha's friend Sarah (Sinead Matthews) talks about a new | online service which helped her in a similar situation. Martha | yells at her, but Sarah signs Martha up anyway. After | discovering she is pregnant, Martha reluctantly tries it out. | Using all of Ash's past online communications and social media | profiles, the service creates a new virtual "Ash". Starting out | with instant messaging, Martha uploads more videos and photos | and begins to talk with the artificial Ash over the phone. | Martha takes it on countryside walks, talking to it constantly | while neglecting her sister's messages and calls. | robotwizard wrote: | came here to find this. This sort of animation is beyond the | uncanny valley; far enough to wrench someone's heart who has | lost someone see their dear one moving again. But alas, too | removed from reality. | agumonkey wrote: | We're not far from Tom Cruise A.I. dinner party | undefined1 wrote: | next step is having them talk, like this deep fake where parents | brought back their dead son: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6I_wEetSck&t=30s | jackcosgrove wrote: | Deep nostalgia audio from the early twentieth century would all | sound tinny like it came from a Victrola. | michannne wrote: | So freaking amazing how good the 3D depth perception is on that | 3rd GIF. The right side of his hair is correctly obscured when he | turns his head and even his eyelids move correctly. The only | slight issue is his "lazy eye", but then you could argue the AI | took a little creative liberty | The_rationalist wrote: | Off topic but if you missed it: Dall-e looks like a great advance | in NLU: https://openai.com/blog/dall-e/ | kiba wrote: | I am feeling scared more than amazed tbh. | flycaliguy wrote: | Yikes. It's a little scary to think I may have uploaded a photo | of myself to Facebook without first reading the TOS and then | consulting a futurologist to make sense of its implications. | turbohz wrote: | Imagine they use your appearance to sell insurance to your | relatives... | syntaxing wrote: | Edit: Seems like its based off of something similar to this | (https://github.com/AliaksandrSiarohin/first-order-model) | | This is pretty cool and eerie at the same time. The biggest thing | to keep into mind about these algorithms is that the computer | "dream" of these moving videos so they can be inaccurate. | Nevertheless, seeing some moving video of my ancestors would be | pretty neat. | [deleted] | ttul wrote: | Alas, the image you see in your head is also a dream created by | your brain's neural networks. | [deleted] | The_rationalist wrote: | Except brain's neural network don't work the same way | ghaff wrote: | My understanding (happy to be proven incorrect) is that's | still a matter of disagreement. AFAIK, the idea of the | brain having feature detectors of various kinds remains a | matter of research as it has been for decades. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-02-26 23:00 UTC)