[HN Gopher] Excel Never Dies ___________________________________________________________________ Excel Never Dies Author : iamacyborg Score : 232 points Date : 2021-03-08 14:58 UTC (8 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.notboring.co) (TXT) w3m dump (www.notboring.co) | rob74 wrote: | ...but where Excel really shines and enhances productivity is in | combination with that other tool we all love and will never give | up, email. Someone emails you (and 10 other persons) some data in | an Excel sheet, you (and unbeknownst to you, 2 other persons) | update the sheet with some new data and reply to the email, and | after a few iterations nobody knows anymore how many versions of | the document are in circulation and which one is the most up-to- | date. Oh, joy! | aksss wrote: | Sounds like a training issue - Excel has a much better tool | available now. Click the "Share" button in upper-right corner | and now you're all working on same doc and have concurrent | editing capability. | pmarreck wrote: | I'm wondering if spreadsheets could be used as a tool to | introduce programming to kids, since all the intermediate values | are visible, and most programming is just data transformation. | The fact that spreadsheets are effectively functional languages | might mean that looping could be implemented as recursion with | tail-call optimization... instead of only having cell references | you could have references to keyboard or mouse input values, or | URLs pulled from outside sources, or files read off the local | storage... Instead of just having charting and graphing tools, | you could have, say, a Turtlegraphics output box that would | follow the instructions from some designated series of cells | (which perhaps were themselves generated by formulas) | adamredwoods wrote: | Excel is horrible to program in. Example: I needed to import a | bunch of URLs, then pull the query params out and auto-create a | SQL query based on those. I was able to do it, but when I entered | the Visual Basic editor, it was a whole new word of UI hurt. | iamacyborg wrote: | That sounds like probably the sort of thing that shouldn't be | done in Excel though. | adamredwoods wrote: | I like to push software around, but yes, there are better | ways to do this. | dragonwriter wrote: | > Excel is horrible to program in. | | VBA, and the built-in DE for it, isn't great, but you can | program Excel other ways (Office Add-In, xlwings, etc.) | breck wrote: | Spreadsheets and Programming Languages are about to procreate. | The future is nigh. | | https://youtu.be/vn2aJA5ANUc?t=145 | asdff wrote: | They were procreating 45 years ago with S. | breck wrote: | Link to a screenshot that shows relevance? | chrisgd wrote: | It is used as a graphics output of those financial models as | well. Bankers, both commercial and investment, use it to copy and | paste into PowerPoint presentations that form the basis of | billion dollar transactions everyday. | submeta wrote: | Is there a way to manipulate Excel cells from within | Python/Pandas? Last time I checked I had a hard time to write to | an existing Excel file (= prevent overwriting it). | | Would love to do the complex calculations in Python instead of | using VBA. | hypermachine wrote: | Not just Excel, the integrated scripting environment around it | too. A lot of the heavy lifting in complex setups is done by | custom VBA scripts. | onychomys wrote: | Someday they'll update the VBA IDE to have some super basic | features (like autoformatting or text highlighting or | whatever). That'll be so great. | asdff wrote: | Someday accountants and business people everywhere will bite | the bullet and spend the 5 hours or so it takes to get a | working knowledge of R and finally step into the first world | of programming languages. | hypermachine wrote: | Sign up for our mailing list (link in profile), that's what | we are building (and more including support for collab | editing, version control, and cloud native deployments). | Tade0 wrote: | I've been having this nagging thought lately: what if web app UIs | started off as in-browser spreadsheets and evolved from that? | | After all 90% of web apps are just forms with some validation and | lists of things - a spreadsheet can do all that with greater | flexibility as a bonus. | lopatin wrote: | Love the idea. An app that evolves from a spreadsheet is pretty | brilliant, mate. | jason2323 wrote: | lol. One of my observations from my experience at startups : if | you want to create a B2B SaaS company, convert a company's | spreadsheets into a webapp and voila! | nicoburns wrote: | > just forms with some validation and lists of things - a | spreadsheet can do all that with greater flexibility as a | bonus. | | Speadsheets are great at a lot of things, but data validation | doesn't tend to be one of them. In fact, I'd argue that's one | of the main reasons to move off of spreadsheets: to make your | data more structured. | | It may well be possible to create a spreadsheet-like UI that is | good at these things though. And I can certainly see that being | successful. It'd be difficult to tradeoff flexible vs | constrained though. | DavidPeiffer wrote: | > Speadsheets are great at a lot of things, but data | validation doesn't tend to be one of them. | | What limitations are you thinking of? I can go to Data -> | Data Tools -> Data Validation and restrict to whole number, | decimal, list, date, time, or string length. If that's | insufficient, you can create a custom formula which has to | evaluate to TRUE for the input to be considered valid. Regex | isn't supported out of the box, but quite a number of string | functions are, and there are readily available Regex user | defined functions (VBA called via formala) available online. | | You can also customize the error alert that would be | displayed to the user if they try to input something invalid. | I think it'd work quite well for many MVP/single page web | apps. | grey-area wrote: | The question is not what a sufficiently motivated competent | person can do with the tools. | | It's what a sufficiently motivated incompetent person can | do to your data with the tools. | | Infinite flexibility in the tooling means infinite ways to | mess the database up in subtle and/or irredeemable ways, | and a formula in a cell or even a regular expression are | not great ways to tidy up real-world data, you often want | autocorrect, autosuggest, defaults and friendly error | messages for bad data rather than just ERROR IN CELL G91. | When you reach that level of complexity it becomes much | harder to build something useful with a spreadsheet-like | tool alone. | | It is a really interesting idea though and for certain | classes of data could really work well. | nsm wrote: | Airtable (airtable.com) is doing something like that. It's less | Excel and more a souped up relational database, so a slightly | different angle where you surface the CRUD of a CRUD app to the | user. | hermitcrab wrote: | I see Airtable as an online database with the ease of use of | Excel. I created a system for a local charity using Airtable. | I found it worked really well and the charity are delighted. | sidpatil wrote: | I think Microsoft dropped the ball big-time by not making it | easy to export an Excel workbook or Access project as a mobile- | ready turnkey Web application. (It looks like it's _possible_ | to do, but not _easy_ to do--from what I can tell, it either | requires Office 365 or third-party software.) | | If that functionality existed and was easy to use, it could | have been a very convenient option for businesses running their | operations on Access database and looking to take advantage of | mobile. | | I know Microsoft has InfoPath and Forms, but those aren't | Access, so they're not going to be as popular. | breck wrote: | I figured out how to do this years ago, even before I worked at | Microsoft (and pitched it while there a number of times). | | It wasn't easy, and there was a lot to figure out, but the end | result is starting to look pretty simple: | | https://youtu.be/vn2aJA5ANUc?t=145 | | https://github.com/publicdomaincompany/copypaster | pwdisswordfish0 wrote: | The copypaster.publicdomaincompany.com URL in the project | About box is broken. | breck wrote: | Fixed! Thank you for letting me know! | Tade0 wrote: | > In 2021 let's start making all web forms copy/pasteable. | | I love the premise - will give it a go. | breck wrote: | Great! If you take any notes on pain points trying to | implement that pattern, would love to hear about them! My | email is in profile | tonymet wrote: | I would love an entire OS (like ChromeOS) & protocol around | Excel/spreadsheet. you log in, and everything on your desktop is | a spreadsheet : contacts, calendars, email/messaging, forms. Like | a primitive hypercard with only table view. | hateful wrote: | Over the years, the wife and I tried numerous shared calendars - | but nothing has yet topped the one I made fairly manually in | Google Sheets. I just copy a few rows down every once in a while | and we keep it going. Color coded, Emoji for different types of | events, each week is collapsible and shows just the emoji for | that day. Never happier. | | Every other calendar's interface and customization seemed like a | limitation rather than a feature. | tgb wrote: | I hadn't used Excel in years and now that I do, there's some | things about it that drive me _nuts_ : | | - It forgets what you've copied to clipboard. Copy something. | Insert another row so that there's space for it. Paste. Nothing | happens. Huh? It lost my copy. It does this for a large number of | operations and it drives me crazy. I've never seen any other | program do this. | | - You can't open two spreadsheets of the same name. This is | because spreadsheet formulas can refer to cells in other tables. | But I don't use that feature - can't I just open the second | spreadsheet with a warning that this feature won't apply to it? | | - (This one applies to too many pieces of Microsoft technology.) | You can't use common keyboard shortcuts properly. Ctrl-backspace | deletes a word in any useful text box. Not in formula editing in | excel. And ctrl+delete deletes the rest of the line instead of | just the next word. Why? | bhandziuk wrote: | The clipboard being cleared when you do some not-paste action | is pretty annoying. I assume it is this way though because if | you alter the sheet in some way which intersects with the cells | being copied paste might not know what to do. Like if you | insert rows, or change a value, the thing you copied might have | changed. It might not have but it would be more confusing I | think to have Excel make than analysis that it changed in some | meaningful way then clear the clipboard sometimes than to just | always clear the clipboard. | setr wrote: | Aren't things that could change always defined by a formula? | You already have two paste operations -- by value or by | function. It seems to me the reasonable thing is to simply | follow through: if you paste by value, you paste whatever it | was at the time of copy -- if you paste by formula, you paste | the formula... and whatever computed result. | | Pasting the possibly modified value is, IMO, always | undesirable; so you can ignore the possibility altogether | bhandziuk wrote: | I think if Paste Values pastes something that is no longer | on the screen that is weird. How long do you wait to clear | the clipboard if that's the case? What if I copy some | cells, then change everything about my workbook (changed | sheet names, changed named range names, refreshed linked | data, inserted rows in the middle of my copied range...), | then paste, do you still expect it to paste the original | values? Do you expect that most users understand what's | about to happen? I think the whole question is avoided by | clearing the clipboard earlier than might sometimes be | desirable. | tgb wrote: | Paste Values should paste the values that it had at the | time of copying, period. Other programs behave thusly. If | I'm making an image in Inkscape, I copy a portion, delete | it and then paste it, I get the value I copied even | though it had since been deleted. Same as if I edited it | after copying, like changing a color. Excel should mimic | that. | bhandziuk wrote: | So if the underlying value changes enough that pasting | anything but the values doesn't make sense then what's | the UI here? Ctrl+C does nothing but Ctrl+Shift+C gives | you the option to paste values with the inappropriate | ones greyed out? Does the dotted border on the copied | text go away because ctrl+C isn't going to work or does | it stay because some portions of paste special can still | work? | tgb wrote: | I think the scenario for pasting formula is the same as | for pasting values: paste what was there at the time of | copying. Is there a situation where this doesn't make | sense? I'd be fine with it being kinda-wrong in | situations like the original cells referred to another | cell but now there's been a new row inserted and those | cells are elsewhere and the clipboard hasn't updated. | That's what I would expect a copy to do. Excel allows | references to cells in other spreadsheets and if you edit | the other spreadsheet, then the references in your first | spreadsheet don't update to reflect that, so the | clipboard would just act like another spreadsheet. | | Edit: the better way to say this is that "copy (do | something) paste" should always act the same as "copy, | paste on a new blank spreadsheet, (do something) and then | copy and paste that onto the original spreadsheet". | bhandziuk wrote: | It'd be cool if it worked like that but I'm sympathetic | to it not | setr wrote: | I'm not sure I am; the current behavior is almost always | surprising and unexpected. You effectively need to keep a | list in your head of everything that will clear your | clipboard, which is really a list of everything that | could _ever_ cause problems, more often than not a flag | that is entirely unrelated to your actual intent /action. | | You might as well have it clear the clipboard if your | next action isn't immediately paste and be done with it. | Just don't bother to set the expectation that pasting | will work like elsewhere. | ModernMech wrote: | I love Excel and it's one program that's always open on my | computer. But the thing that still kills me after all these | years is that every open Excel process shares the same undo | stack. | | Say you have have Excel Process A and Process B, and you make | an edit in A, then an edit in B, then an edit in A again. If | you try to undo the edit in B, it will instead undo the edit | you did in A. Infuriating. | jamses wrote: | You can open separate Excel instances by holding ALT when | starting it up (second time onwards). Not quite the same | thing as you want, but think the undo behaviour you describe | makes sense if you're working in two sheets that are linked | in some way. | smhenderson wrote: | The thing about the clipboard has been around since the | beginning of Excel. I thought I had read an article about it by | Joel Spolsky years ago but all I could find now was a quote by | Joel answering a question on a forum. A superuser comment | quoted Joel as an answer [1]. The archive link for the original | discussion is here [2]. | | [1] https://superuser.com/questions/611854/prevent-excel-from- | cl... | | [2] | https://web.archive.org/web/20160725070440/http://discuss.fo... | sokoloff wrote: | The one that drives me insane is that while editing a cell | formula, that using the arrow keys move cells (and update | [read: wreck]) the formula rather than moving the cursor within | the formula you're editing. | airstrike wrote: | Just hit F2 while editing a formula to toggle between Edit | and Enter modes, one of which will behave as you expect. The | other mode, which you hate, is very useful when you want to | add references to other cells into your formula | jacurtis wrote: | Yes, the edit mode (using arrows to create formulas) is | actually something I really find convenient. | | To me it is a feature, not a bug. But yeah, F2 is fairly | easy to use once you get used to it. Its like using VIM, | the shortcuts seem annoying to the uninitiated, but once | you get understand how everything works, the power can | really speed things up and you appreciate it. | Balgair wrote: | > - It forgets what you've copied to clipboard. Copy something. | Insert another row so that there's space for it. Paste. Nothing | happens. Huh? It lost my copy. It does this for a large number | of operations and it drives me crazy. I've never seen any other | program do this. | | Try 'WindowsKey + V'. | | It'll bring up a list of your previous copies. Not as easy as | 'Ctrl+V', of course, but it does save a bit of time. And yes I | agree, Excel's Alzheimer's is quite annoying. | lifeisstillgood wrote: | Mind ... blown ... | myself248 wrote: | Whoah. | ant6n wrote: | - Excel constantly wants to change cell contents, in the name | of improving formatting. For example, paste a table with | something that excel thinks are dates, it will convert it to | dates, and show the data in some format. Formatting it back to | text will give you the #days since epoch instead of the | original text. | | - Excel hates text cells containing numbers. It whines about it | all the time and eagerly changes the data to what it thinks it | should be. | | - Excel doesnt get it if a sheet contains a data table with | consistent formatting. Just recognize it and store it | internally as a small Infile DB. Often, an Altertx table will | blow up 100-fold when exported to Excel. | linuxftw wrote: | I haven't tried it on Excel specifically, but most programs | support ctrl+shift+v to clear formatting. | OldHand2018 wrote: | > Excel constantly wants to change cell contents, in the name | of improving formatting. For example, paste a table with | something that excel thinks are dates, it will convert it to | dates, and show the data in some format. Formatting it back | to text will give you the #days since epoch instead of the | original text. | | This is definitely annoying behavior, but you do know that if | you format the cell as text prior to pasting the data in it | will keep it as text, right? | magicalhippo wrote: | > This is definitely annoying behavior, but you do know | that if you format the cell as text prior to pasting the | data in it will keep it as text, right? | | This only works sometimes, and I have no idea when or why. | | The most reliable way I've found is to copy more than one | column and use the text importer thing, where you can | specifically mark columns as being text. | marcosdumay wrote: | Some times yes, other times Excel will replace the format | you set with what it guesses from the data. I have no idea | what triggers each behavior. | | What's more interesting is reading those dates by the COM | interface. Depending on how the user input the data, you'll | get formated dates as text or seconds since the epoch as | number. | beefield wrote: | I'd have a couple of development proposals for excel: | | 1. Remove the ability to save workbooks. This would keep the | excel in organisations where it excels (pun intended), namely | quick & dirty sketches and visualizations. If you need something | twice, it is likely you need that more than twice and you should | be using something else. | | 2. If not that, give me a worksheet type that forces each cell in | a column to have same formula or data type. and just a sheet that | you can refer to as any other sheet, not a powerwhantnotthingy. | | 3. Version control. Seriously, Microsoft, what on earth are you | paying your excel developers for if not this? | layer8 wrote: | You get close to #2 using Excel's table feature. | aksss wrote: | > 3. version control | | I think this is provided through either OneDrive/SharePoint or | some other offboard solution. Do you really want Excel to have | a native version control system? Seems like other solutions | would always do this better. | aarondia wrote: | I totally agree that this makes sense for certain types of | Excel work -- the data analysis, report generating workflows. | You can see my comment above about how we're addressing some of | these issues with Mito. | | However, not sure that these three points hold for the type of | financial modelling work that is done in Excel today. There | isn't a great unbundling of Excel for the LBO, etc world (yet), | so the inability to save or have columns with multiple data | types/formulas seems quite limiting for that world. | beefield wrote: | I was thinking that there were two types of worksheets. the | current, freeform sheets, and in addition to that a new type | that would enforce data integrity over columns. That would | make it _much_ safer to have worksheets for structured data | and freeform sheets for visualizing etc separate. | | (the first one was admittedly a bit tongue in cheek.) | morningtigerx wrote: | Another thing Excel can't do well is when you need multiple | people to be updating a single spreadsheet shared in OneDrive / | SharePoint. If too many people have it open, OneDrive can fail to | merge the changes, and you might have races and end up with data | corruption. | runawaybottle wrote: | Startups that began as a Craigslist category: | | https://cbi-blog.s3.amazonaws.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/20... | | Now someone make that for web apps that began as an excel | spreadsheet. | | Or even better, ML projects that should have stayed a simple | spreadsheet. | guessbest wrote: | If anyone wants to gather ideas on an app idea, they would be | well served by running the following query in their favorite | search engine : "<app idea> xlsx" | sega_sai wrote: | As a person who mostly does (large) data analysis and mostly uses | python, I've recently thought of when I prefer to use | spreadsheets vs python and my (personal) conclusion was to use | spreadsheets, when my data can fit into one screen. In that case | with excel you directly see all your data, you can change inputs | and see output change in real time. But if the amount of data is | larger than that, I am better off with dedicated calculations (in | say python) and plots summarizing the data. | jplr8922 wrote: | I used to think that I hated excel, and that as a DataScientist- | TradingDeskAnalyst, python or R would save the world. Now I | realize that my hatred for Excel has nothing to do with the | software itself, but the way it is used for political motives. If | your VP or Top Trader or Boss choose to keep everying on 'his' | excel, its not for sofwtare quality. Its for control. You can run | away with your excel-data-model on a USB stick. Not so true for | SaaS. You can keep it on your PC, and not share it with others. | You can put passwords without IT knowing about it. Excel = Shadow | IT department with hidden political goals. | SeanLuke wrote: | > Excel, and more importantly, the spreadsheet is the best way to | build intuition for a dataset, hands down. | | Excel is a low-dimensional, untyped, flat database. I couldn't | think of something worse. It has been successful only because its | design mimicked traditional accounting books. But for more | complex datasets, ugh. | | Back in NeXTSTEP days there was Lotus Improv (and later | Lighthouse Design Quantrix). It permitted high dimensions, true | names for rows, columns, hypercolumns, cells, and so on, and | sophisticated modeling capabilities. It was, clean, required none | of the ugly bug-filled hacks you see in Excel, and very easy to | get your head wrapped around. Of course it's dead now. | iamacyborg wrote: | > It permitted high dimensions, true names for rows, columns, | hypercolumns, cells, and so on, and sophisticated modeling | capabilities. It was, clean, required none of the ugly bug- | filled hacks you see in Excel, and very easy to get your head | wrapped around. Of course it's dead now. | | Do named ranges in Excel not match some of what you're after | here? | SeanLuke wrote: | A little bit. But it's hard to explain just how advanced | Improv was (and still is). | intrasight wrote: | Me and spreadsheets go way back. My first job was hacking Lotus | 1-2-3 at Kodak as a summer intern in 1985. I consider it my first | programming job. | | A year later, I got interested in neural networks, and built | back-propogation models in Excel on the mac. Yes very SLOW but | still a great way to learn. | | As side project ten years back was to leverage Excel's native web | query (IQY) mechanism to build a profitable SaaS company just | based upon letting users get data into Excel from various 3rd | party social media and analytics platforms. | | Now I work in big oil and our team basically turns Excel models | that users create into scalable data warehouse apps. | | Even after years working with Excel, I still consider myself a | journeyman. | sumtechguy wrote: | Using excel for learning NN. Multi input on a node would be a | bit wonky (but doable) and layers could just be sheets in the | workbook. It even already has a bunch of nice built in tools to | import/export data. That is one of those 'why did I not think | of that' things! | ekianjo wrote: | Excel Never Dies except when you feed it more than 1 million rows | which is very common these days. Completely outdated for many | uses. | rustybelt wrote: | PowerPivot is one of the best ways to start exploring an | unfamiliar dataset of 1 to 10 million records. Built into | Excel. | mbreese wrote: | But that's rare for the vast majority of users. How many people | need to _really_ calculate with 1 million rows of data? That | may be common in some fields, but when you hit that level of | data, you know that you should be using other tools. Excel hits | a solid sweet spot for a large percentage of the computing | public. | cyrialize wrote: | Agreed. People who use Excel daily knows it's limitations. | | They know that it can't work with huge amount of data, but | they do know they could have their internal tech team upload | the data into their database and send them a snippet of the | data. | hermitcrab wrote: | Try telling that to the UK government: | | https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-54423988 | iamacyborg wrote: | Excuse me, our Tory government has a long history of | competence. | | /s | hermitcrab wrote: | I have built 3 commercial products: a seating planner, a visual | planner and a data transformation tool. I'm confident that Excel | is the main competitor for all 3. | williamtwild wrote: | >But there's one software product born in 1985 | | Excel born in 85? Ok, but spreadsheets were around long before | Excel | kgwgk wrote: | And long before computers! | Tijdreiziger wrote: | That's discussed in the article. | moonbug wrote: | not only will it never die, it's more important and has greater | impact than all your hipster languages ever will. | terryf wrote: | Definitely it will never die. | | You know you've won when there's a special interest group (with a | yearly conference!) focused on risks the software is creating | http://www.eusprig.org/ | jedjdjdjaj wrote: | Excel is shit. | moonbug wrote: | Excel is programming. fight me. | fersarr wrote: | I'm also one of the people trying to build a more convenient way | to do these kind of things: https://hupreter.com | GnarfGnarf wrote: | I've seen spreadsheets with horribly complex, incomprehensible | algorithms, that are so much easier and simpler to write in C++ | or Python or any programming language. | | BTW XLWare makes a great library LibXL to create genuine .XLSX | files from a program. | _pdp_ wrote: | Excel is great no doubt but everyone forgets that it is solving | only some types of problems - mostly data input, fomula-based | calculations, etc. It is completely unfit for purpose for others. | zwieback wrote: | I remember playing around with Multiplan and 1-2-3 in the 80s but | the first time I saw Excel I knew I witnessed the birth of the | greatest SW product of all times, ever. At the time engineers | still spent a lot of time writing crappy one-off homebrew | scientific apps and Excel really helped as a first platform for | calculations you didn't want to do on your calculator. | | It's hard to imagine now but at the time PCs were command-line | only and the early Excel versions, at least the one I saw, booted | up a runtime version of Windows just to run Excel. I'm not sure | whether they ported it over from MacOS to that special version or | what but it was shocking to see. | selimthegrim wrote: | Engineers can do better than Excel! See Blockpad | (https://blockpad.net) | zwieback wrote: | Looks nice, I'll give it a whirl. | pjbster wrote: | I will never trust Excel for manipulating any real world data. | Period. | | Excel only keeps the first 15 digits of any number you give it | [0]. If you want to keep the full number, you have to store it as | text instead. And then you can't perform calculations with it | without converting back to a number and losing fidelity. | | The two most prevalent data types in business are numbers and | dates. It's incredible that Excel is rubbish at dealing with both | and yet the world thinks it's the gold standard for doing | "business-y stuff" in. | | [0] https://docs.microsoft.com/en- | us/office/troubleshoot/excel/l... | hermitcrab wrote: | If anyone is interested in reading about Excel related disasters | then I recommend Matt Parker's intersting and entertaining | 'Humble Pi' book. | TheRealDunkirk wrote: | Like a lot of Linux zealots who ran Linux everywhere for 20 | years, I hated most things associated with legacy Microsoft, | because of EEE, and what they did through SCO. However, I had to | relax my attitude about 10 years ago, when I realized that I owed | my entire career to Excel. | | I've mostly made a living by being an engineer who creates | proper, focused software tools for other engineers to use, and | almost every program I've written is because there was a crappy | Excel tool trying to cope with the problem, and falling over due | to size and unshareability. That's when I write a website in | Rails, or a WinForms .NET application, keep adding features until | users stop asking for fixes, then move on to the next one. | | Of course, there's been ebb-and-flow in my career, but the bulk | of it has been driven by the fact that Excel is so seductive, and | easy to start something useful. Then, like a lot of Microsoft | products, leaves you hanging when it's time to get serious. So, | credit where it's due. Whatever you can say about it's | shortcomings, they've been my bread and butter for 27 years, and | counting. | F_J_H wrote: | _> > "Then, like a lot of Microsoft products, leaves you | hanging when it's time to get serious."_ | | This is like a moving company saying their small moving vans | "left them hanging" once they outgrew them and started doing | national vs. local moves. A tool that proves useful at one | stage is not useless because it can't be as useful at ALL | stages. | | The great thing about Excel as it enables you to do the one | thing that kills most start-ups, projects, etc., which is | simple to _start_. | TheRealDunkirk wrote: | I mean... that's kind of exactly what underlies my whole | comment. | aksss wrote: | > the one thing that kills most start-ups | | I thought you were going to say taxes and bookkeeping. :D | xupybd wrote: | The company I work for has their CAM manufacturing calculations | run through excel. | | The non technical director has calculated every possible route | line required for our CNC process. This is something that would | be very hard to do in a conventional programming language. He did | it with no coding background and it's one of the most | maintainable pieces of software in the business. It's all laid | out in front of you. If they need a diagram to explain something, | it's there inline. There are no unreadable long nested if | statements. He didn't even know you could nest them. It is truly | amazing, I've not seen anything like it. I've seen plenty of | train wrecks where people try to run other parts of the business | through excel. | makach wrote: | Except for when it plunges itselfs into the fiery pits of Mordor | capybara_2020 wrote: | This is the most confusing article layout I have ever seen. The | first part is almost an article in size and is an ad and then | what seems to be another ad about some people. I was about to | close this article assuming it was just spam with a click baity | title. | mbreese wrote: | I'm fairly certain the original format is for an email | newsletter. Once I figured that out, it all made more sense. | wmab wrote: | Agreed, it's a well researched piece published without any | editing. Some good treats in there though if you can find them! | monroewalker wrote: | Do others here still recommend using Excel/Google Sheets despite | having programming knowledge, or are there more powerful tools | available (eg. Airtable) which might be less accessible to people | without tech backgrounds? If spreadsheets are still the way to | go, any recommended resources on learning some best practices | with them? | | I never got into spreadsheets because it seemed unnecessary after | learning how to program, but I end up missing out on applications | that might work in excel but which I don't care enough about to | hand-write. | munchbunny wrote: | Yes, I absolutely still recommend Excel/Sheets. | | It highly depends on what work you need to do, but in general I | use Excel for quick and dirty data crunching where the number | of rows isn't that big (<100,000) and I don't expect to need to | repeat the analysis often. For example, as a cyber security | analyst, one-off sifting through some CSV format logs. Being | able to do some basic transforms on the data with the benefit | of real-time visualization is nice. | aksss wrote: | Absolutely. Excel is a workhorse. It would be like asking if, | since I got my bulldozer, do I ever still use a shovel. Yes. | All the time. It has massive casual utility on a day-to-day | basis. Add to that a lot of your business partners communicate | information in Excel. When I was a young programmer I | intentionally developed good excel skills because it was the | idiom my customers knew. I felt like they would think less of | me if I wasn't competent on such a basic tool of business. And | I think that instinct was correct. I look at someone in the | corporate world who's unable to sling a good spreadsheet as | developmentally disabled. Like if you walked in saying you | don't know how to use a word processor. Spreadsheets are a way | of exchanging data between humans in the same that word | processors facilitate this, but for structured data sets. Time | spent learning basic Excel functions (math stuff and xlookup | for example) and how to build pivot tables will pay you | dividends over the years. | Arainach wrote: | Excel is incredibly useful for all sorts of quick data | crunching. My preferred introduction to intermediate-level | spreadsheet usage is Joel Spoelsky's "You Suck at Excel" | | https://youtu.be/0nbkaYsR94c | coliveira wrote: | One of the main excel advantages come from the fact that the app | presents useful features and never changed their interface. | Unlike modern software that try to change their workflow to | "improve" it, excel has kept the same stable interface for | decades. This allows people to create workflows built on the | software, not fighting it. Excel users know that the interface | they employ will be stable for another 20 years, or even more. | Very few applications can say this, the other ones I know of | including Vim and Emacs. | warmwaffles wrote: | When they updated the interface from office 2003 to fit with | the new hot rounded UI was a tragedy. | asdff wrote: | No one held a gun to your head and told you to uninstall | perfectly good office 2003 | warmwaffles wrote: | Except when it was forced on us by our IT department. | charwalker wrote: | Yeah, they tried adding a Ribbon once in 2007 and it blew up so | much they left it in but barely changed it since. | asdff wrote: | R would like a word. 45 years of workflows and still going. | pwdisswordfish0 wrote: | "Stable"? Like the version that screws up basic window | management features? (Simulates the Alt+Tab behavior; doesn't | actually let you have two Excel windows side-by-side.) Thanks, | Office team. | fermienrico wrote: | Native Windows XP + Excel was badass. No new features were | needed. No one asked for anything else. It was feature complete. | | Have you tried running an older version of Excel (2007 era) even | in a VM? It is lightning fast. No cell-movement animations and | this unibar crap at the top, saving a file is 2 clicks away | unlike the newer version going off to the cloud, making requests | and having to back out to save locally. WTF. | | Excel is an amazing app. UI engineers and PMs at Microsoft are | trying to kill it. | aksss wrote: | That save as... workflow is most annoying. Adobe does that too. | In almost every scenario there's a sync tool to take care of | cloud storage. The web is great, but the web is slow and | brittle. The cloud save is best when it's an asynchronous | background task. | tgbugs wrote: | In academic data management I have identified what I suspect is a | common progression over the course of a career. Obliviousness to | the problem. Rage at the inadequacy. Search for alternatives. | Realization that you do not have the resources to build and | maintain something else, much less train all the labs to use it. | Further realization that it is harder to explain how to set the | right file encoding and the fact that a csv file is not a colon | separated file to hundreds of labs than to just accept xlsx. | Acceptance that Excel is a more reasonable user interface for | data deposition than anything you could come up with. | | It is sad, but at the end of the day, however bad Excel is for | life sciences data (to the point where standards bodies renamed | genes due to autoformat issues!?), it ends up being better when | usability and bad data edge cases are considered. Defaults matter | for non-technical users, and even asking them to change the | format they save in to csv is likely to cause issues because it | is one more manual step that can go wrong, or there is some | locale nonsense that will cause something to break etc. | aarondia wrote: | Excel, and more importantly, the spreadsheet is the best way to | build intuition for a dataset, hands down. The alternatives, | especially when it comes to Python and the default pandas output | in a Jupyter Notebook are horrendous. | | Where Excel falls short, is data size limitations + auditability. | Putting more than 1M rows of data into Excel is not possible, and | once you get into the low 100K's, it becomes almost unbearable. | And handing off an Excel workbooks to a colleague is handing them | hours of cell dependency tracing. On the other hand, data size + | auditability are the super powers of Python data analysis. | | I've been building a Python package, Mito (https://trymito.io/), | its an interactive spreadsheet that automatically converts your | spreadsheet analysis to the equivalent pandas code. You can write | spreadsheet formulas, merge datasets, create pivot tables, etc. | And because its implemented in Python, you can manipulate | datasets with 10M rows of data with no problem. Our goal is to | bring the intuitiveness of Excel data manipulation to Pandas. | screye wrote: | > best way to build intuition for a dataset | | Could you elaborate on this please ? I work with a lot of | datasets, and have found python + libraries | (plt/pd/np/scipy/regex) to be far more useful. But, that might | just be my inexperience with excel. | | Can you give a few examples of analyses that work better in | excel than python ? | csydas wrote: | Not the GP, but I think they are speaking specifically to | non-programmers with this statement. | | It's not about which analyses are more performant/easier in | one object versus the other, it's how do you most easily | introduce the general audience to big data, both reading, | manipulating, and transforming. | | I actually disagree with their statement tbh, as I think that | it's too nuanced of a situation to scope like this. | | I used to work in a university, and depending on the dataset | and the intended output, I would switch between R and Excel | for the students. Those who needed R level analysis | eventually saw why it was more useful for them than Excel and | got good at seeing when to use R versus when to use Excel. | | Those who had datasets/output goals that didn't need heavy | lifting really just needed Excel. It's not incorrect to say | that learning heavier tooling/languages is a benefit, there | is also a time consideration to learn and become efficient at | a given toolset. The heavier toolsets have their nuances and | accomplishing the same task in less robust toolings like | Excel is the more efficient and better approach for those who | have extremely limited time and for those who are not likely | to need the heavier toolset in the future. | | It's just a simple cost benefit analysis -- what tool is | going to give the best return on time investment? | | There is a very valid and reasonable argument that investing | into the heavier toolsets will eventually reach a point where | even the simple tasks that Excel and other tools allows users | to perform more easily with less knowledge is faster/better | with the heavier language; the question is "when is it | optimal for a given person to invest the time to get to that | stage?", and that's a question that doesn't always have all | available data to make an informed decision on since it's | hard to predict the future. | aarondia wrote: | You're definitely correct that its a nuanced question | whether for a given (user, analysis) pair they are better | off in Excel or Python/R/etc. Specifically with respect to | building intuition for a dataset, however, there is a huge | benefit of having an interactive data representation (if | only for the ability to scroll and see all of your data). | | Because you can think of Mito as a frontend interface to | Pandas, using Mito doesn't prohibit you from building | intuition or analyzing your data in the same way you would | if you didn't have the spreadsheet frontend. It just helps | you write the Python/Pandas code faster + see the most up | to date version of your data set in live time. | | The typical Mito user uses Mito multiple times throughout | an analysis. A common pattern is: start by just visualizing | the data in Mito, create a few graphs to help understand | the distribution using matplotlib (right now we only have a | tiny bit of graphing support), passing the data back into | Mito to do some filtering and cleaning, then lastly | creating a pivot table output using Mito. Of course, it | varies greatly from user to user, but that's a general flow | we see often! | iamacyborg wrote: | I think it's more simple than that. The way the data is | presented to you in Excel makes it incredibly easy to grok. | F_J_H wrote: | For me it's SQL and then simply visualizing. | aarondia wrote: | As a bit of background on Mito, it works by passing the | parameters from the frontend spreadsheet to the Python | kernel backend, which transpiles the spreadsheet formula | into Python/Pandas code [0]. So what we're hoping to do | down the line is let the user pick which language to | translate to, SQL and R being the obvious next steps. But | that's a ways away :) | | [0] https://trymito.io/blog/transpiler | fifilura wrote: | The problem with SQL is that it is not great with | pivoting. But maybe that is not a big problem when you | auto-generate the SQL. | | I agree, SQL is what I like more for mangling. Except for | the pivot/melt part that is | loudmax wrote: | IMHO where Excel falls short is in interoperability. Try | processing .xlsx files in anything _other_ than Excel and it | can be painful. Let 's see the new more open Microsoft really | embrace competing on an even playing field that doesn't rely on | ossified proprietary file formats. | aarondia wrote: | Lack of interoperability is an interesting angle, but not one | that I've ran into quite as much. I've usually gotten around | that by converting to a csv file in the case of data, or | screenshotting graphs, etc. | | Would love to hear a bit more about your workflows where | you're trying to process an .xlsx file in another system. I'd | imagine it would be a nightmare, but haven't ran into it | myself :) | fartcannon wrote: | CSV files is one of the main problems with excel. Auto- | guessing formats is the bane of many casual importers. And | the warnings about tsv or csv when you open is tantamount | to dark pattern. I can accept it once, but let me disable | the pop up. Do Not auto save to xls or xlsx. | aksss wrote: | I don't see that as a dark pattern because it's honest - | I will often open up a CSV and then turn on filters, sort | the data, maybe highlight a few rows. The warning about | losing that when trying to save as a csv is an honest | warning. The same as opening a jpg in Photoshop or Gimp, | adding layers and trying to save it back out - you'll | also get a warning that you're about to lose work by | saving to a simple file format. | fartcannon wrote: | Do it once, provide a "Don't remind me again" check box | and save that for eternity. | | The dark pattern is in repeatedly nagging me about this | fact. | orhmeh09 wrote: | How is that a "dark pattern?" There's no deception | involved. You're calling things "dark patterns," but I | think you think dark patterns are just UX you find | annoying. | fartcannon wrote: | I call it a dark pattern because it indirectly | discourages the use of interoperability in file formats. | | The suggestion is 'use xlsx or suffer this annoying pop | up'. | | It's an easy fix. Have an option to disable it. | | The other dark pattern, since we are chatting about them, | is that you cant disable auto formatting. Excel will try | to guess at your data, forcing you to jump through hoops | to prevent it. The subtle suggestion is 'just use xlsx | and this problem goes away' when in fact, they could | offer an option to disable autoformating. | gsich wrote: | CSV is not interoperable as you lose the formulas. | rchaud wrote: | Whatever is in your XLSX can be converted to a static CSV | file. Charts, pivot tables and formulas won't be transferred | over, but then again I wouldn't expect them to. | | The value Excel provides far outweighs the drawbacks of a | vendor-specific solution. | zelphirkalt wrote: | Now we only need to get everyone to export to a | standardized CSV, perhaps one adhering to its own name, | comma separated values, and we are good. | LeifCarrotson wrote: | The data in an Excel file can be exported as CSV, but the | value in an Excel file is the dependencies and formulas | that have been built up into a representation of the | business rules. The problem is that this often becomes the | _only_ representation of the rules, and auditing it or | puzzling the data out of that Excel sheet after the fact is | like pulling teeth. | | A business might want to get to improve, say, their quoting | accuracy. I've seen lots of places that write quotes using | Excel. They use a complicated spreadsheet to estimate "We | need $4500 in parts from vendor A, but in previous projects | with components from vendor A often needed rework, so we | multiply their quotes by 1.5 to account for the risk and | for someone (typically Bob) to rework them; Bob's workload | is over 90% and he's less efficient when he works overtime, | so multiply his total hours by an additional 1.25, we also | have to adjust his hourly rate by 1.5 to account for | overtime..." | | It's a Hard Problem to convert the quoting process from one | of a few engineers who also do quoting by copying and | modifying the blank Excel template and years of human | domain expertise into a process where data entry techs | input stuff to a CRUD webapp. This is fraught with peril | because the Javascript/SQL guy you hired to write the | webapp (or, heaven help you, the SAP consultant) hasn't | been reworking gear from Vendor A for 15 years and sees | what looks like an error when the formula for actual cost | from vendors B, C, and D takes their quote price multiplied | by 1.1 (for shipping? margin? ) and vendor A's quoted price | is multiplied by 1.5, and, hold on, the VBA macro | separately takes the the estimated dollar amount purchased | from Vendor A, divided by 2000, and adds it to the head of | maintenance's estimated hourly total for the project? | | Making business decisions about logic tied up in Excel | formulae is hard. Writing logic in something other than | Excel where you can more easily see the business logic is | probably harder. Convincing non-technical decision makers | to learn VBA to evaluate their vendor selection is probably | harder still. | rchaud wrote: | I wasn't really able to follow this, if I'm being honest. | But given the number of dependencies you listed, both | human and software-based, it does not seem like Excel is | the problem here. | | It sounds like VBA has allowed that team to build an | advanced prototype of a quote generation web app. The | next step seems to be to convert the Excel formulas and | scripts into JS or Python. Quality assurance may be a | hassle, but that is to be expected with any kind of | refactoring. | bcoates wrote: | Not really. Processing xlsx files in full generality is | basically reimplementing Excel, but if all you need to do is | extract/modify values and formulas or produce a workbook | excel will accept there's plenty of libraries that will do | that, and it's not that crazy to just hack something up using | an xml parser. | | I had to port some stuff that was using the google sheets API | over to manipulating xlsx files instead, and it wasn't a big | deal. | civilized wrote: | I'm a data scientist who isn't an Excel wizard and I'd like to | have the other direction, turn my dplyr code into Excel | aarondia wrote: | I'm less familiar with the R ecosystem, but there are tools | in the Python world to go that direction -- | https://xlsxwriter.readthedocs.io/ | Robotbeat wrote: | What non-spreadsheet programming languages/environments do you | think work better than Python/Jupiter? | | I've been fairly happy with the default Matlab IDE personally. | Visibility and representation of data has the | straightforwardness of a spreadsheet. But surely there must be | others? | twobitshifter wrote: | Julia in VSCode is nice. The speed gains from Julia are worth | it alone if you are working with large datasets. | hypermachine wrote: | A lot of environments do not have easy to use hot reloading | out-of-the-box (and also quick GUI creation support). This is | the primary reason why development feels less intuitive in a | lot of text based languages versus more visual tooling like | Excel which can give instantaneous feedback. | | Hot reloading is most famous for being a staple of Lisp | languages (but they tie it to the repl rather than as a | standalone feature). For Microsoft languages this is provided | by Visual Studio (commonly known as edit-and-continue, it is | available in some form or other since the original VB days). | You can try it out with the embedded VBA interpreter in Excel | (under the Developer tab). | | For JavaScript this is a recent innovation (driven primarily | by the React/SPA crowd). In Java, most IDEs have the feature | but it requires a fair bit of setup and configuration (look | up hot swap for Intellij). The closest thing Python has is | Jupyter which admittedly is not that pleasant to use. | lispm wrote: | > but they tie it to the repl rather than as a standalone | feature | | Lisp has a function called LOAD, which can load source | and/or compiled code. | hermitcrab wrote: | There are a number of visual data transformation | environments, including https://www.easydatatransform.com (I | am the developer), https://www.alteryx.com and | https://www.knime.com . | airstrike wrote: | > What non-spreadsheet programming languages/environments do | you think work better than Python/Jupiter? | | RMarkdown + RStudio + knitr | jdgoesmarching wrote: | I really wish Python had the kind of support for Markdown | that R does. Notebooks are fine, but the simplicity of | having essentially a plain text file is just amazing. | Something1234 wrote: | Rmarkdown theoretically supports python. I haven't used | it though. | vharuck wrote: | Knitr theoretically supports anything you can call from | R. Chunks pass their code and options to "engine" | functions that return the results. Knitr provides a bunch | of engines out of the box (Python, awk, SQL). But you can | also write your own. | | yihui.org/knitr/options/#language-engines | | I once made a SAS engine to show coworkers how to adopt | report automation without having to rewrite all existing | code. | hypermachine wrote: | Mito looks really interesting, I look forward to trying it out. | I'd there a way to sign up for Mito without the hubspot | meeting? | | For us we are going the opposite approach, we are building a VB | interpreter to make it easier to run, build, and extend | existing Excel programs. We allow calling libraries written in | WebAssembly and GraalVM supported languages. | aarondia wrote: | Feel free to Twitter DM me @_aaronDR, would love to hear | about what you're building + get you set up with Mito :) | igorkraw wrote: | How does it compare to visidata? | aarondia wrote: | There's a bunch of ways that Mito and Visidata are different. | The two largest probably being: | | 1) Mito is an extension to JupyterLab whereas Visidata is a | CLI tool. As a result, Mito is a react frontend that is more | of a traditional Excel-styled spreadsheet interface. You can | use your mouse to perform point-and-click transformations, | like writing configuring pivot tables or writing spreadsheet | formulas. | | 2) Mito generates Python/pandas code for every edit the the | user makes. So users are generating a script to manipulate | their dataframes, running that script, and then continuing to | use their dataframes throughout the analysis. People use Mito | in a Jupyter notebook the way that they use pandas code, | multiple times throughout their analysis, interspersed with | graphing, ML, etc. | algorithmsRcool wrote: | > Putting more than 1M rows of data into Excel is not possible, | and once you get into the low 100K's, it becomes almost | unbearable. | | I dispute this. Yes, the normal spreadsheet view of excel will | buckle under 1M rows, but excel has another feature called | "Power Pivot" that is backed by an embedded database and scales | into the high millions at least. | | I've personally used excel on a dataset of 18M rows and | PowerPivot handled it just fine. | | [0] https://support.office.com/client/Data-Model- | specification-a... | | [1] https://support.office.com/client/power-pivot-powerful- | data-... | aarondia wrote: | There's also a workaround in Google Sheets where you can | store your data in BigQuery and use the spreadsheet to | interact with it. | stilisstuk wrote: | Yes pp can handle data. But vba can not. And most | spreadsheets contain vba for reporting and magic interfaces | for managers. Slow and unmaintainable. | | Any day: rmarkdown and csv | texasbigdata wrote: | Big fan of this, but powerpivot sits on vertipaq (I believe) | which is an in memory columnar DB or sorts (apologies if | that's incorrect). So at this point you're getting awfully | close to direct querying (another msft feature) which while | analogous resembles more traditional db/client if you squint | hard enough. | | But yes, big fan of vertipaq which I believe also powers | PowerBI. | craig_asp wrote: | Just to clarify.. Yes, vertipaq is the tech behind power | pivot, power bi and sql server analysis services (in | tabular mode) and the same column-oriented storage is also | used in sql server. Excel generates queries against the | data stored in a vertipaq model. You cannot write normal | excel formulas on top of it and you have to use DAX (a | unique to msft language, which is the replacement for MDX) | instead, which is pretty much a no-go for anyone but well- | trained power users. | agumonkey wrote: | Excel, depending on who organizes the data, can lead to god- | table with 123 columns. | | Now someone with a bit of balance, can go quite far with it. | 1980phipsi wrote: | New sheets are your friend. | sonthonax wrote: | Nice product, I noticed that you are updating the next Jupyter | cell; what was your solution to doing that reliably since | `set_next_input` is so damn flakey? | | I personally grew so frustrated with the state of GUI | development in Jupyter that I tried to fix it in such a way | that would allow proper message passing between cells and | python code (because you can't wait on Comm events). | | > https://github.com/ipython/ipykernel/pull/589 | | But sadly the priorities of big open source projects don't | always match your own. So I had to extract that logic into my | own kernel. | tryitnow wrote: | What's the pricing model? There's a lot of potential here. | aarondia wrote: | We're still exploring the business model to support the | project. Right now, Mito is free to trial, and we're | experimenting with a subscription plan somewhere in the range | of $10 per month. I'd say about half of our users are using | it for free and half of them are on some sort of | subscription. | | We're also considering open sourcing the tool, and doing the | classic Enterprise Sales / consulting / other value add | services on top. | | If you have ideas about which direction to take it, would | love to hear! | serjester wrote: | Horrendous? Strongly disagree if you're doing anything non- | trivial. As soon as you start mixing the two, both become | worse. You're basically losing the UX benefits of native Excel | and adding confusion to Pandas. | | Yes, Pandas has a learning curve but so does Excel once you get | into advanced functionality. It's inevitable. Once you get | through this it's a fairly intuitive powerhouse. | aarondia wrote: | That's a good point -- and maybe horrendous was too strong of | a word. It's actually been really interesting talking to | people who come from the Excel world vs the Python world | first. There's a group of people we've ran into who have | never used Excel before, and for them, you're right, giving | them a spreadsheet interface to write formulas and manipulate | their data is actually a huge disadvantage. | | I think the way that Mito tries to walk the line is by making | the Python code visible for the user to see what the | equivalent Python looks like + easily usable in your | analysis, but also completely generated for you. So | hopefully, we're not introducing the confusion of pandas into | your workflow. | hacker20210308 wrote: | I have a soft spot for Excel. | | It inspired me to do this 4 (almost 5 now) years ago in | JavaScript. The prototype was written to prove a DOM renderer | could handle trillion cell datasets having a high on screen cell | density running at 60fps. | | Bonus: Watch to the end of the video to see video running in a | cell. | | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ff-eDS4OZpk | syntaxing wrote: | Excel just works so well, almost too well. Wanna share some | formulas? Excel. Finance calculator? Excel. A small (<2000 lines) | database? Excel. Even with Python for Google Sheets, I sometimes | want to rip my hair out when I use Google Sheets compared to | Excel (though the Google Python is pretty useful for | autogenerated sheets). | guessbest wrote: | Excel is basically a 4GL at this point replacing Foxpro and | other. The only thing I've seen Access is used for is ODBC | connections to databases. | aksss wrote: | Access is an interesting beast. Much maligned by IT shops | everywhere. But it's pretty powerful when you think about it | as excel with a relational table model and a built-in | reporting interface. I mean it makes all the sense in the | world why it exists as a business tool, but it's a cul-de- | sac, usually tipping you off that it's time for a "real" | database and/or some COTS apps. Been decades since I | seriously used Access, was before I ever got really exposed | to true RDBMS's and writing against them. But it's probably | where I got introduced to SQL, something a surprising number | of developers don't know these days. | not_knuth wrote: | Tell me more about these developers that don't know SQL. | How is that possible? What line of work is this in? | dgdosen wrote: | I think MS is making a postitive step in allowing loading js/ts | libraries via node as part of it's programming model compared | to just using VBA. | | This could be very powerful. It would help Excel to be | repurposed to potentially something greater.... | | Of course, Google Sheets and Apple Numbers should tap into that | same functionality... | scubbo wrote: | > I sometimes want to rip my hair out when I use Google Sheets | compared to Excel | | Earnest, non-"gotcha" question - what is it about Google Sheets | that you dislike or find irritating? I'm only an entry-level | user for both, but I've found them of similar quality and | functionality. | kthejoker2 wrote: | As someone who pretty much only uses them for quick and dirty | data shaping, at least for me Google Sheet's filter | experience is garbage compared to Excel. Takes 5 clicks to do | anything, can't right click to add/remove filters, the | filtering process itself is janky, doesn't recognize data | types ... | iamacyborg wrote: | > Earnest, non-"gotcha" question - what is it about Google | Sheets that you dislike or find irritating? | | Using Tables in Excel is a gamechanger. Not having support | for them is a huge point of frustration for me whenever I | have to use GSheets. 95% of that is the fact that I can refer | to the Table and columns by a given, logical name rather than | having to use arbitrary cell identifiers. | quacked wrote: | Excel Tables combined with Excel Power Query will turn "hey | boss, I figured out a way to save a few hours a week" into | "hey boss, I just eliminated several people's jobs". | aaisola wrote: | Google sheets is useful for basic tasks. But as a power tool | for complex models etc. it pales in comparison to excel. Not | to mention that keyboard shortcuts are not the same which | makes everything take significantly longer. | p00dles wrote: | ^1 for Excel keyboard shortcuts. | | One can customize the ribbon at the top for must used | functions, which can make Excel such a fast tool to use | compared to Google Sheets or even Excel for Mac (speaking | as a Windows user). | | If I had a big Excel project to do, and I had the choice of | 1/2 day on Excel (Windows) vs. a full day with Google | Sheets or Excel (Mac), I would pick the 1/2 day with Excel | (Windows). | aksss wrote: | The keyboard shortcuts improve productivity so much. | Yeah, as another said it's amazing when I try to use | Excel on a Mac how much I evidently depend upon the | shortcuts in normal use. They're all different on the Mac | version, and I can only take so much of it before I just | email myself what I was working on and pick it back up on | the PC. Seems like an easy thing for MS to reconcile but | I don't want to give up my keyboard mapping, and I'm sure | the Mac Excel guy doesn't either. Nice feature would be | to choose what shortcut layout you wanted despite | platform. | aaisola wrote: | Agreed..I actually have a separate laptop (Windows) that | I use for nothing but excel. Even Excel on Mac isn't the | same as on Windows | p00dles wrote: | I removed the F1 from a keyboard so that I don't misfire | when going for F2, resulting in the dreaded 'Help' window | that you have to use a mouse to click out of. | aksss wrote: | Microsoft PowerToys on Win10 will let you remap keys. If | nothing else you could make F1 do what F2 does. | | https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/powertoys/ | layer8 wrote: | Ctrl+Space, C used to work for closing the Help window | until recent versions. Unfortunately that doesn't work | anymore, the only solution is to use a VBA macro bound to | a keyboard shortcut. At least in return the keyboard | focus now remains in Excel instead of switching to the | Help dialog. | ghaff wrote: | This is true of GSuite generally. So long as you need | fairly basic functionality (which is all a lot of people | need), its simplicity is a virtue and it works well. I | prefer it to Microsoft Office 99% of the time. (Though I | sometimes need Office for interoperability as well.) | | I used to sometimes have to run massive spreadsheets. But | these days, I mostly use it for things like personal | activity tracking. | mediaman wrote: | Agreed. Google sheets feels great initially. Then you go to | do that thing that you do in Excel, and...you look for it, | and it seems like a basic omission, so you figure you just | missed it, and Google around for it, and no, it's just not | there. | | Even silly little things, like the fact that Sheets doesn't | have an indent function, which makes it harder to neatly | format financial data. I think the accepted workaround is | to manually put spaces in front of every single row you | need indented. | fifilura wrote: | What we'd do - as the layer between engineering and upper | management - was to do as much aggregation as necessary | using notebooks and at the end run the "export to google | sheets" call (thin layer on top of google apis). That would | give the recipient some kind of control and allow them to | feel the data and twist and turn it their own way, while | not having to do the "big data" python/SQL stuff | themselves. | | I am at a new company now and I have yet to figure out how | to create the "export to onedrive/excel" command. Google | libraries to google sheets seemed so much more competent | and well built. (But maybe i am biased...) | jeanloolz wrote: | I have extensive experience with both and the main benefit | Excel has over Google Sheets (in my opinion) is the amount of | rows you can handle all at once. With Excel you can | manipulate 200k rows easily. The same can not be said with | Google sheets due to the fact that it remains a cloud based | tool. I found Google sheet to be enough though in 90% of my | cases (may change depending on what you usually work on). The | scripting ecosystem google sheets has is amazing (apps | scripts and various python libraries) and is much stronger | compared to Excel. | neolog wrote: | > With Excel you can manipulate 200k rows easily. The same | can not be said with Google sheets due to the fact that it | remains a cloud based tool. | | How is the number of rows related to cloud-based? | scubbo wrote: | That's helpful to know, thanks! | [deleted] | ulucs wrote: | My personal gripes are the lack of tables, RC notation and | iterative calculation | bcoates wrote: | Google sheets has a 5 million cell limit, and can't usefully | do things cross-workbook. In practice complex spreadsheets | substantially smaller than that are slow and unstable. | | That said, the multi-user editing is much smoother than excel | and the remote API is better. | yread wrote: | Except that it keeps changing. It's already on version 4 | and at least one forced a complete rewrite of accessing | cell values (and of course the old version was | discontinued). Compared to Excel files from the 90s that | keep running | Spooky23 wrote: | Sheets is awesome and has a lot of power, but it's | constrained in the browser and is defined by its competitor. | | The other issue is that you don't see as many power users of | Google Docs and Google doesn't have a clear strategy. For | example, they could easily make a power bi type tool on top | of Sheets and Slides. | tln wrote: | Like Data Studio? | iamacyborg wrote: | Right, but why invest more in that when they also offer | Looker? | tln wrote: | I didn't know about Looker, but my BI needs are modest | and Data Studio is free and simple enough. | | Looker is a third party solution right? Or does Google | offer Looker directly in some way? If you're up for | sharing the pricing for looker, I'd be curious (the | looker website has a request quote button, so I'm | guessing it's not cheap) | Spooky23 wrote: | Went through a product evaluation and that product was | never mentioned! | Mengkudulangsat wrote: | If Excel can handle >1m rows, all these "Big Data" analysis will | just mean a bigger spreadsheet. | apples_oranges wrote: | I've just read the chapters on VisiCalc and Lotus 1-2-3 in | "Founders at Work". It looks like VisiCalc made the Apple II take | off back in the early days. And Lotus 1-2-3 addressed all the | pain points people had with it a few years later on a more | powerful platform (PC). Interesting stuff for sure. Why do I | discover this book 12 years after it was published? | wmab wrote: | This is a well researched article touching on some key points as | to why Excel lives on. Interesting for me is the unbundling of | Excel, and the birth of many B2B SaaS products. I'm not sure | Excel was ever the right program to generate many of these | products, and so it makes sense someone built a specific program | to house it (product boards, CRMs, calendars all fall in this | imo). Others however, absolutely, I'm not sure the long term | value in some products that can simply be done in Excel - often | when a startup goes after one of these verticals it's hard to | create value for the user and the business, because by building a | product you are by definition limiting the potential/power of the | program by limiting what it can do. So you're asking someone to | pay for something that is more limited than it's Excel-cousin, | but might be simpler to use and look prettier. An example to me | of this is financial modeling / flightpath type apps for | businesses. Instead of paying for a bunch of saas, maybe a | company should go back to hiring more Excel ninjas, ergo Excel | Never Dies. | Balgair wrote: | Aside: Joel Spolsky's now famous talk about Excel is a _must_ | watch for anyone that uses Excel but hasn 't been arsed to | actually take a course in it. Even for Excel haters out there, | the talk is _very much_ worth your time today. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nbkaYsR94c | omega3 wrote: | I don't see any software produced today approaching the level of | user-centric productivity and speed one can get out of (keyboard | only) Excel. Is software like this just not being produced now? | jerjerjer wrote: | Hilariously, Access is another Microsoft product which also | helps with user-centric productivity. | | Many hate it but it sure is an easy way to build an entire data | entry/CRUD app without any programming knowledge. | asdff wrote: | It totally is. R is even faster and more productive than Excel. | Buttons840 wrote: | I've been thinking about trying to create my own open source | spreadsheet. I can't decide if they're simple or complicated. | | The simple view is that all you need is: (1) One main UI | component, "the cell" (2) a domain specific formula / programming | language (3) the underlying reactive system that tracks cell | dependencies and updates them, etc. | munchbunny wrote: | I think it depends on what you intend for it to be used for. | | The reductionist view of it is that it's a workspace for | crunching numbers. But in practice, Excel is sometimes used | like a frontend for a database engine, with sometimes heavy | scripting to integrate into software processes and workflows. I | think Excel's ability to stretch beyond what anybody would | still reasonably consider the scope of "spreadsheet software" | is why Excel is as entrenched as it is. | | I don't think many programmers see it as a safe or ideal way of | handling the kinds of workloads that people use it for, but I | think we all acknowledge its unmatched ability to let non- | programmers automate data crunching. | airstrike wrote: | Well, you can """Write your own Excel in 100 lines of F#""": | http://tomasp.net/blog/2018/write-your-own-excel/# | | Posted here but didn't get traction: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24980325 | haolez wrote: | Excel is like Emacs for non-programmers. It's a sandboxing tool | for your imagination to go wild. | ianhorn wrote: | People are all talking about how it's useful for quick stuff with | datasets, but it goes far beyond that. It's useful for quick | _anything_ you might want a small database for. Imagination is | the limit. | | For example, if any of you play D&D online, you might be familiar | with dndbeyond's character sheets. They're a fantastic way to | onboard new players who might not have the inclination to spend | hours with the rule books before they even start playing. It does | all the calculations for you and gives you some buttons like | "roll athletics" and doesn't let you add more spells than your | character can have with their stats. | | I recently persuaded some friends to give FATE a try and built | analogous push-button character sheets with google sheets [0]. It | was quick and simple. With conditional formatting, you highlight | bad states (rules say you can't have more of X than Y!). With the | script editor, you can add full on buttons for dice rolls and | other state changes with whatever logic you want (anything you | can code up!). Checkboxes are obvious but super useful. And the | transparency of the calculations is helpful for teaching people | the system (this stat is "min(A4, B1+C5)"). | | Without google sheets, it would be a serious endeavor to build a | stateful, database backed, live collaborative GUI that can be | added to and customized on the fly by my users. With google | sheets, it was a quick fun afternoon hack. Excel/google sheets is | an amazing piece of technology. | | [0] Screenshot of the "app": | https://raw.githubusercontent.com/imh/public_images/main/Scr... | asdff wrote: | I find with excel it takes just as much time to set up a | spreadsheet to do what I want as it takes for me to do the same | in R, usually a lot more time with Excel. Both pieces of | software have learning curves, just to me R is the better tool | for the job for working with tabular data. Excel forces you to | hardcode your fomulas and ultimately adds a lot of cruft and | time wasted, compared to R which is much more modular. That | "min(A4, B1+C5)" is liable to break if your spreadsheet | changes. R functions on the other hand are pretty well | documented, and you could do anything you want in R after | following a tutorial for a couple hours. Instead of having to | hard code a position, you can refer to it relatively or by some | unique identifier, so your calculations still work no matter | how your underlying spreadsheet changes or is shuffled around | (and familiar formulae like sum and min and max are there by | the same names). It's way easier to do statistical tests and | plot data consistently in R as well. Oh, and you can export to | .csv or .xlsx from R if you'd like of course. | CJefferson wrote: | At no point do you talk about UI here -- for a character | sheet (or most simple things), I want to control layout to | some degree, let users edit some numbers, and see others | automatically update. Obviously I could have a file full of | constants and a bunch of print statements at the end, but is | there anything nicer / more dynamic? | jimbokun wrote: | 1. You know how to program. | | 2. How does the UX for your R solution to the "DND Character | Generation" problem compare to the screenshot from | grandparent comment, for users not familiar with either R or | Google Sheets? | jjnoakes wrote: | > That "min(A4, B1+C5)" is liable to break if your | spreadsheet changes. | | I don't usually have that problem. Inserting or deleting rows | or columns around the cells doesn't break these formulas. | Only changing what type of information a cell contains would. | Does this happen often for you? | stjohnswarts wrote: | Thanks, I'm definitely going to check out those sheets. I | haven't d&d'd in a while and was thinking about joing up to a | group at my local comics shop. | navneetloiwal wrote: | We started a company with the core premise that spreadsheets | will never die [0]. Spreadsheets are so good at the most casual | data viewing and exploring tasks to creating complex financial | models. They are also the de-facto choice when you have data | (not big data) from multiple sources that you need to "join". | We tend to underestimate the beauty of this tool which can be | used productively at all points of the skill spectrum. Everyone | feels at ease in the familiar territory of a spreadsheet, which | is what makes it ubiquitous and basically impossible to kill. | | If spreadsheets were two-way connected with your core systems | like SaaS tools, DBs, Slack, etc then you could represent | serious business logic and actions without being a programmer. | It is the best platform to build a "no code" tool for non- | programmers. | | [0] http://coefficient.io | Waterluvian wrote: | Absolutely. | | My last five uses of excel are widely variant in theme: | | - validate my taxes make sense | | - track Bloodborne platinum trophy progress | | - collab with wife on Christmas gift planning | | - estimate lumber purchase for project | | - collab with coworkers to explore ota data culling options. | wlesieutre wrote: | I'm running a game of D&D and needed an accessible character | sheet that works from a phone with good support for pinch-to- | zoom. | | Tried fillable PDFs and a bunch of online stuff. None of it | worked well. The spreadsheet fields' font sizes were all weird, | and even if you manually correct them it would reset on every | edit. There were some promising web-based options described as | "responsive character sheet", but they tended to fall apart at | large text sizes. | | Best option? A spreadsheet from Knights of The Braille: | https://knightsofthebraille.com/59-2/ | | Instead of trying to shove an 8.5x11 paper layout into a phone, | it just groups stuff into tabs that make more sense anyway. And | if you were completely blind I bet it's still easy to navigate | with VoiceOver. | | We're using Numbers because it's what we both have, but I think | Excel should work similarly. | | If anyone's reading this from the Google Docs team, please take | another look at Sheets' pinch-to-zoom behavior. That was the | first place I ended up when I went looking for character sheet | spreadsheets online, and it was the first one I ruled out | because of how shitty the experience was on mobile. | fredfoobar wrote: | OT, but does anyone remember the easter egg in excel that | literally opened up a flight sim? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-03-08 23:00 UTC)