[HN Gopher] Understanding Coinbase
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Understanding Coinbase
        
       Author : jger15
       Score  : 83 points
       Date   : 2021-03-13 19:53 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (diff.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (diff.substack.com)
        
       | eruleman wrote:
       | The biggest threat to Coinbase are decentralized exchanges like
       | Uniswap & Sushiswap. During the peak of DeFi summer, Uniswap
       | handled more trading volume than Coinbase. [0]
       | 
       | Uniswap airdropped its token $UNI to all users on Sept 17, 2020.
       | Uniswap is already at a $17 billion market cap. Coinbase is
       | expected to IPO at ~$100 billion.
       | 
       | [0] https://www.theblockcrypto.com/data/decentralized-
       | finance/de...
        
         | gruez wrote:
         | How's the liquidity/UX/fees on decentralized exchanges these
         | days? Last I heard they were pretty lacking in those aspects.
        
         | dehrmann wrote:
         | The biggest threat is Bitcoin (and other popular
         | cryptocurrencies) stop going up or experience a crash. Sure,
         | there are true believers, but I suspect most people are just
         | looking for an asset that's going up. It could be gold, Nikes,
         | NFTs, Pokemon cards, or bitcoin.
         | 
         | Or stocks, I suppose, but at least they have revenue.
        
           | epx wrote:
           | Bitcoin skeptic is the new politically incorrect
        
         | granzymes wrote:
         | Correct me if I am wrong, but those decentralized exchanges
         | don't seem to allow converting a token to dollars/euros/other
         | currencies or vice versa.
         | 
         | At some point the ecosystem needs to interact with banks for on
         | and off ramps, and that is where Coinbase excels.
        
         | gbasin wrote:
         | I would argue the biggest threat to coinbase is another crypto
         | winter where volumes fall by 90%! And eventually the asset
         | class becoming mature, so fees also fall by another 90%
        
           | mancerayder wrote:
           | Didn't Coinbase already survive that 2 years ago?
        
             | hanniabu wrote:
             | Yes, and before that.
        
           | geniium wrote:
           | That's what we call a strong correction. Or even a <<
           | capitulation >>. It's pretty healthy if u ask me. Market
           | cycles. It will happen again.
           | 
           | The question is when? After what BTCUSD price? We'll probably
           | run the bull a few more months and then crash.
           | 
           | And then start all again.
        
           | gruez wrote:
           | >And eventually the asset class becoming mature, so fees also
           | fall by another 90%
           | 
           | Are we talking fees for coinbase pro, or the spot price
           | offered by coinbase on their website? The prices for the
           | former are already pretty low, with most exchanges charging
           | around 0.2% on their lowest volume tier. The prices for the
           | latter might be high, but I can totally imagine it staying
           | high considering that forex rates at your local bank is
           | equally as bad (around 1-2%). As a point of comparison for
           | both, transferwise charges 0.4% for converting euro to usd.
        
             | gbasin wrote:
             | The fees. 0.2% is not low compared to any mature market for
             | trading. As a point of reference, Robinhood is free.
             | Interactive Brokers will charge you a fraction of a cent in
             | commissions, so on a $30 stocks that's about 0.01%
        
               | mandelbrotwurst wrote:
               | Sure, although you are comparing the rate to that of
               | stock trades while the person you're replying to is
               | comparing to currency exchanges.
        
               | gruez wrote:
               | Stock trading is cheap for a variety of factors that's
               | not applicable to crypto (eg. payment for order flow,
               | stock lending [1]). A stock brokerage can also skimp on
               | security because the legacy financial system has an undo
               | button for oopsies. Finally, a 0.2% fee is relatively
               | competitive with a "reasonable" commission of $5-10/trade
               | (the going rate before brokerages became commission-free)
               | as long the trade is below a few thousand dollars.
               | 
               | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20276551
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | mquander wrote:
               | Why will those factors not be applicable to crypto?
               | (People taking custody of their own cryptoassets may mean
               | that the exchange can't lend them out, but as exchanges
               | continue to pass the test of time more and more people
               | may be willing to leave assets on exchanges.)
        
               | gruez wrote:
               | AFAIK the only reason why there's a market for lending
               | stocks is because the SEC prohibits naked short-selling.
               | If you want to short-sell, you need to locate a share
               | somewhere and "borrow" it, which leads to brokerages
               | offering to do that for a price. For crypto this isn't
               | required because you can short using CME bitcoin futures,
               | which is cash settled and therefore doesn't require you
               | to locate/borrow anything.
        
         | syzygyhack wrote:
         | Nah. High frequency trading on L1 is too expensive, especially
         | long term as state grows.
         | 
         | Biggest threat is L2 exchanges. CEX-style speed and convenience
         | and DEX-style non-custodiality. My money is on Nash since they
         | went the legal path plus fiat on-ramping, i.e. actually
         | competes with Coinbase's main source of profit.
        
         | xienze wrote:
         | > The biggest threat to Coinbase are decentralized exchanges
         | like Uniswap & Sushiswap.
         | 
         | Yeah, assuming gas fees ever come down to something halfway
         | sensible. A _minimum_ of $50 both ways to trade is a tough pill
         | to swallow.
        
           | hanniabu wrote:
           | Optimism L2 it's having its public release on the 15th.
           | Uniswap is expected to launch on Optimism with their V3
           | update not long after.
        
         | agumonkey wrote:
         | One thing with the eth/uni world.. it seems like fluffy unicorn
         | land. It's full of new lingo and bits to assemble (metamask
         | etc) to maybe get something working. The crowd for this might
         | be very small.
        
         | benreesman wrote:
         | Without personally taking a position one way or the other I
         | think it's fair to point out that perspectives on DeFi in
         | general and AMMs in range from "the future of finance" to
         | "scammy ICOs with Solidity code _and_ a whitepaper", even among
         | people who are into crypto.
        
         | brianvli wrote:
         | Coinbase is more about turning non-crypto currencies into
         | crypto currencies while UNI/SUSHI are more about turning crypto
         | currencies into different crypto currencies.
         | 
         | In my POV, there's only two ways to get into crypto:
         | 
         | - Centralized exchanges with KYC
         | 
         | - Mining
         | 
         | Coinbase is a KYC centralized exchange and enables people to
         | turn their bank account $$s into crypto. Uniswap and Sushiswap
         | are only relevant once someone has crypto and needs to exchange
         | between various tokens.
        
           | dwighttk wrote:
           | Coinbase tells me there are no fees for crypto to crypto
           | conversion, just when I initially buy crypto with cash. What
           | does a decentralized exchange give me that beats that?
        
             | hanniabu wrote:
             | > What does a decentralized exchange give me that beats
             | that?
             | 
             | Owning the actual asset and not just an IOU
        
             | rawtxapp wrote:
             | There _are_ fees for every exchange, not sure where you saw
             | the no fees part.
        
               | dwighttk wrote:
               | Do you mean they give me a slightly worse exchange rate
               | than I could get somewhere else? The "fee" line when I do
               | an exchange is $0.00
        
           | fastball wrote:
           | As others mentioned you're forgetting an economy which just
           | uses crypto as the means of exchange, which for many has
           | always been the long term goal.
           | 
           | But you're _also_ forgetting P2P crypto marketplaces like
           | LocalCryptos[1], which (for Ethereum) allows you to have
           | smart contract escrow and therefore the middle-man is only
           | really required in the case of disputes. I personally have
           | transacted  > $100k with LocalEthereum, not once having an
           | issue with a trade, and most settling in under 30min.
           | 
           | [1] https://localcryptos.com/
        
             | jacques_chester wrote:
             | > _As others mentioned you 're forgetting an economy which
             | just uses crypto as the means of exchange, which for many
             | has always been the long term goal._
             | 
             | Taxes are owed in income or capital gains, whatever form
             | that income or capital takes, but taxes can only paid in
             | legal tender. Until the IRS et al hang out a wallet address
             | for payments you will still need to touch the ordinary
             | financial economy.
        
               | fastball wrote:
               | A good number of people (in the US at least) legally pay
               | no taxes every year. So it's hypothetically possible to
               | live entirely within crypto (legally) already.
               | 
               | But yes, that was more talking about the future. That is
               | the matter at hand, after all - Coinbase's future (or
               | lack thereof).
        
           | echelon wrote:
           | Yesterday someone asked for me to pay them in Bitcoin rather
           | than PayPal/CashApp.
           | 
           | I'm kind of at a loss for how to do this...
        
             | gzer0 wrote:
             | You can send, receive and even buy Bitcoin with fiat with
             | CashApp after you go through their KYC procedures within
             | the app. [1] https://cash.app/bitcoin
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | noman-land wrote:
           | Don't forget working for it by doing stuff and receiving
           | payment in them. That's my personal philosophical favorite.
        
             | littlestymaar wrote:
             | True, though in practice "stuff" means "drug dealing". \s
        
               | samatman wrote:
               | It's fairly normal to receive payment in cybercoins if
               | you're working for a company in the space. At least it
               | was in the ICO era.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-13 23:00 UTC)