[HN Gopher] Ketchup is a non-Newtonian fluid ___________________________________________________________________ Ketchup is a non-Newtonian fluid Author : pseudolus Score : 24 points Date : 2021-03-13 11:53 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.scientificamerican.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.scientificamerican.com) | User23 wrote: | Also true for (some?) honey[1]. I remember learning about Ketchup | and that, among many other things, from the Einstein Anderson | books[2] when I was a child. | | [1] | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S02608... | | [2] https://www.goodreads.com/series/101369-einstein-anderson | simonblack wrote: | Shake and shake | | The ketchup bottle. | | None'll come, | | And then a lot'll. | DougN7 wrote: | My Grandma said: | | Silly silly ketchup bottle | | First a little | | Then a lottle | | Same meaning :) | lordgrenville wrote: | I find this with some brands but not with others, so assumed it | was a solved problem and some manufacturers are just cutting | corners on bottle design. Is this not the case? | devoutsalsa wrote: | As someone who can use almost an entire bottle of Heinz 57 on | an order of French fries, this made me laugh. Whenever I ask | for ketchup at a restaurant and they bring me "only" 4 packets, | I do my best not to roll my eyes in disappointment because I | know how ridiculous I am. | capableweb wrote: | If I were you, I'd slow down with the ketchup alright, that | sounds obsessively much. Consider that commercial ketchup | tends to have lots of sugar and sodium. | devoutsalsa wrote: | It's alright. I'm balanced it out with a Diet Coke. | kortilla wrote: | Armchair nutrition advice on the internet, that's a first! | What's next? Ice cream and cigarettes are bad!?!? The gall! | carols10cents wrote: | Through decades of experimentation, I have proven that hitting | the 57 on the bottle is the best way to get the shearing force | going. | gerdesj wrote: | Hold the bottle in one hand as normal and instead of hitting | the back of it, hit the underside of your wrist instead ie | hitting upwards not downwards. | | The bottle and the liquid are two "things" which are loosely | connected together via "fluidy" friction etc. When you hit the | back of the bottle, you are effectively trying to force the | bottle around the ketchup that is trying to dribble out | downwards. Gravity is trying to drag the ketchup out. The | impact will make the ketchup a bit more liquid. Some ketchup | will flow. We know it does because it does! | | When you make an impact upwards, then you are making the bottle | try to leave the ketchup behind (inertia). Combine that with | gravity and the impact liquidising the ketchup and more of the | stuff comes out. | | There are other considerations such as the shape of the bottle. | If you want the fastest deposition then probably something like | a conical bottle with 45deg at the apex or whatever minimises | internal surface area for a given contained volume. However | that will dump an entire bottle in one go and you will impale | your hand if you tap the back of it. It's quite a tough | problem. The squeezy jobbies seem like a bit of a cop out | somehow! | | Assume a spherical, infinite ketchup bottle. Be careful with | your aim. | halfmatthalfcat wrote: | I've always heard this is by design. | dheera wrote: | > Ketchup is famous for being hard to get out of the bottle | | Whatever happened to that LiquiGlide stuff that was touted 10 | years ago? Why isn't it everywhere? | thihguy wrote: | Is solving the ketchup bottle problem like nuclear fusion, the | solution is always 10 years away? | | The flexible plastic bottles mentioned in the article are just as | bad, for some reason they make them very thick. | | Anyone know why ketchup doesn't come in a toothpaste like tube? | That feels like it should work. What am I missing? | monkey_monkey wrote: | It's probably a sizing issue, given how much ketchup gets used, | you'd need a lot of toothpaste tubes, and making them huge | would lead the the same issues as you get with other | containers. | shriphani wrote: | So we should be able to walk on the surface of a pool filled with | ketchup? | | I've seen this video of people walking on custard on brainiac: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz9KnPZWOgs | csunbird wrote: | Braniac is back? I miss that show | thihguy wrote: | Unlikely - a spoon sinks in it. | surround wrote: | No, ketchup is shear-thinning, meaning it's _less_ solid when | under stress. | agumonkey wrote: | I wonder if these properties are used in analog devices... I | recently learned that ovens had thermal switches based on wax | (and expansion under heat). | klyrs wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilatant#Applications | | I'd say that shear thickening fluids as used in traction | control systems can be seen as an analog clutch. | thihguy wrote: | The lock in a washing machine door works like that, which | is why it takes two minutes to unlock. | raverbashing wrote: | Yes! And it's the opposite of oobleck. Meaning, it is shear- | thinning (mayo is similar) | | There's also a 3rd category, the thixotropic fluids, they do | become thinner with stresses but they take a while to solidify | again | _Microft wrote: | Hmm, is it possible to add exactly so much corn starch to ketchup | that the thinning and thickening effects cancel out? | | If it is then most likely only for a particular force applied | because it seems unlikely that the effects are exactly opposite? | | Edit: it should have occured to me that combining ketchup with | thickeners might be a well-researched topic in food science | already. | agumonkey wrote: | Would make a magnificent youtube video. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-03-14 23:00 UTC)