[HN Gopher] HN was down ___________________________________________________________________ HN was down Author : jontro Score : 365 points Date : 2021-03-15 20:43 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (twitter.com) (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com) | symisc_devel wrote: | Hacker News is hosted at M5 and they are having a network outage: | | http://status.m5hosting.com/pages/incident/5407b8e2b00244251... | | edit: Unrelated to the Azure outage. | fotta wrote: | I'm surprised that a site as big as HN is only hosted in one | place. | cm2187 wrote: | You should look at stackoverflow's hosting! | aspectmin wrote: | Is this described somewhere? :) | cm2187 wrote: | The most recent resource I found. I think they basically | use a rack in one datacentre. | | https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/10369/which- | tools-a... | giantrobot wrote: | This is the newest version of their architecture I've | seen [0]. Compare to an overview from 2009 [1]. | | tl;dr StackOverflow's architecture is fairly simple and | has done mostly vertical scaling (more powerful machines) | and bare metal servers rather than virtual servers. They | also realize their use patterns are read-heavy so there's | a lot of caching and they take advantage of CDNs for | static content which completely offloads that traffic off | their main servers. | | [0] https://nickcraver.com/blog/2016/02/17/stack- | overflow-the-ar... | | [1] http://highscalability.com/stack-overflow- | architecture | mwcampbell wrote: | Running on a single server is cheaper, and nobody loses money | if HN is down (as far as I know), so it makes sense. | Sahbak wrote: | Sometimes, it pays off being extremely simple. In HN, it | definitely does | mromanuk wrote: | After this event, they should switch to two servers in | different DC. | centimeter wrote: | Having two servers is a lot more than 2x as complicated | and expensive as having 1 server. | johannes1234321 wrote: | When going to two you need to handle split brain some way | probably, otherwise you end up with an database state | hard to merge, thus you better get three, so two can find | consensus, or at least an external arbitration node, | deciding on who is up. At that point you have lots of | complexity ... while for HN being down for a bit isn't | much of a (business) loss. For other sites that maths | probably is different. (I assume they keep off-site | backups and could recover from there fairly quickly) | ethbr0 wrote: | I haven't run a ton of complicated DR architectures, but | how complicated is the controller in just hot+cold? | | E.g. some periodic replication + external down detector + | a break-before make failover that brings up the cold, | accepting any unreplicated state will be trashed and | rendering the hot inactive until manual reactivation | johannes1234321 wrote: | Well, there you have to keep two systems maintained, plus | keep Synchronisation/replication working. And you need to | keep a system running which decides whether to fail over. | This triples the work. At least. | [deleted] | bpicolo wrote: | There are plenty of sites where it's acceptable to be | down for a bit sometimes. | jsty wrote: | Until 2018 at least it was ... wait for it ... a single | server! | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18496344 | | (Anyone know if that's still the case?) | dang wrote: | One production server and one failover (in the same data | center, obviously). | Aperocky wrote: | HN is probably very small. Curious as to the minimum size of | the backend that will hold up the website. | | There may need to be read replicas, but maybe not even that | is needed. | _joel wrote: | They only have one server, iirc. | voxadam wrote: | And, if I'm not mistaken, the site is single threaded. | aspectmin wrote: | Would love to see the HN architecture. | mike_d wrote: | Single threaded LISP application running on a single | machine. Ta-da. | krapp wrote: | arclanguage.org hosts the current version of Arc Lisp, | including an old version of the forum, but HN has made a | lot of changes locally that they won't disclose for | business reasons. | | There's an open source fork at | https://github.com/arclanguage/anarki, but it doesn't | have any direct relationship with HN. | dang wrote: | It's about the same as what Scott described here: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16076041 | | But we get around 6M requests a day now. | fotta wrote: | Wow, that's not as big as I thought then. What's the | average peak rps? | bombcar wrote: | Maybe standby should be in another rack, perhaps even | another datacenter. | dang wrote: | That would be the natural next step, but it's a question | of whether it's worth the engineering and maintenance | effort, especially compared to other things that need | doing. | | For failures that don't take down the datacenter, we | already have a hot standby. For datacenter failures, we | can migrate to a different host (at least, we believe we | can--it's been a while since we verified this). But it | would take at least a few hours, and probably the | inevitable glitches would make it take the better part of | a day. Let's say a day. The question is whether the | considerable effort to build and maintain a cross- | datacenter standby, in order to prevent outages of a few | hours like today's, would be a good investment of | resources. | cesarb wrote: | > For failures that don't take down the datacenter, we | already have a hot standby. For datacenter failures, we | can migrate to a different host (at least, we believe we | can--it's been a while since we verified this). | | It might be a good idea to verify it; see the recent | events at OVH | (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26407323). | Aperocky wrote: | Question: what is the other things that need doing? | | Obviously does not apply to engineering effort outside of | hacker news website, which the team might be working on. | | But this forum has seen little change over the years and | it's pretty awesome as is. | | (Though I didn't use HN api too much so not sure what's | going on that side). | phpnode wrote: | Team is maybe a bit of a generous term to describe dang! | skissane wrote: | What was the motivation in choosing FreeBSD? | | (Just so nobody misinterprets my question, nothing wrong | with FreeBSD, I know other stuff also runs on it like | Netflix's CDN. Still always interested to hear why people | choose the road less travelled) | tlb wrote: | RTM, PG and I used BSDI (a commercial distribution of | 4.4BSD) at Viaweb (starting 1995) and migrated to FreeBSD | when that became stable. RTM and I had hacked on BSD | networking code in grad school, and it was far ahead of | Linux at the time for handling heavy network activity and | RAID disks. PG kept using FreeBSD for some early web | experiments, and then YC's website, and then for HN. | | FreeBSD is still an excellent choice for servers. You may | prefer Linux for servers if you're more familiar with it | from using it on your laptop. But you use Mac laptops, | FreeBSD sysadmin will seem at least as comfortable as | Linux. | dang wrote: | I don't know, because that decision dates back to pg and | rtm and probably Viaweb days. We like it. | ethbr0 wrote: | Pragmatic engineering: What will this change enable me to | do that I cannot do now? Does being able to do that solve | any of my major problems? (If no, spend time elsewhere) | 1vuio0pswjnm7 wrote: | HN is also available through Cloudflare but that seems to | depend on M5. | | Don't take my word for it. Test it for yourself: | printf 'GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: | news.ycombinator.com\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n' \ | |openssl s_client -connect cloudflare.com:443 -ign_eof | -servername news.ycombinator.com | slig wrote: | Cloudflare only proxies dynamic websites. | dang wrote: | We stopped using Cloudflare a few years ago. | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18188832 | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21799045 | nodesocket wrote: | Not sure why HN would still be a hosted at a 3rd tier provider. | A few EC2 instances (multi-zone) behind a application load | balancer should do the trick. | colinmhayes wrote: | Because it doesn't make any money | nodesocket wrote: | Who cares it's a few hundred a month to host on AWS | mike_d wrote: | Then where will people go to learn about AWS outages? | heavyset_go wrote: | YC's companies get free advertising and job listings on the | front page. | mike_d wrote: | You just described not making money. | peanut_worm wrote: | And now it looks like there is an outage at reddit | mikiem wrote: | Founder and CEO of M5 Hosting here. We did have a network outage | today that affected Hacker News. As with any outage, we will do | an RCA and we will learn and improve as a result. | | I'm a big fan of HN and YC in general, we host of other YC alum, | and I have taken a few things through YC Startup School. During | this incident, I spoke to YC personay when they called this | morning. | 1vuio0pswjnm7 wrote: | It did not seem to affect the Firebase feed. | rattray wrote: | Is HN fully back? Looks like this was a little less than 3 hours | total, is that right? | dang wrote: | Between 3 and 3-1/2 hours to judge by when PagerDuty stopped | bugging me. I was working on code and someone had to tell me it | was back up. | rattray wrote: | Thanks! (And thanks for all your hard work!) | bombcar wrote: | So strange that this coincided with Azure authentication eating | it. | mikiem wrote: | Unrelated issues, but I did hear from our other clients that | O365 was having issues at the same time as our network outage | affected HN and many others. | spondyl wrote: | I didn't notice unfortunately due to the Azure outage blowing | everything up :( | fabbari wrote: | It's seems an odd coincidence of this and the Azure AD outage -- | I was trying to get to HN to see what people were saying about | it! | PenguinCoder wrote: | Definitely. My thought was "HN is hosted on Azure"? So I went | looking into their hosting provider, and lo, they were down | too. M5 might be Azure hosted... couldn't confirm that. | deadmetheny wrote: | Good to see posting purely for karma isn't just a Reddit thing. | yawnxyz wrote: | my fingers automatically just start typing in "news.y" when I'm | idle, I definitely didn't know what to do when greeted with a | 404! | | Is there any way to put the HN homepage on an edge cache so at | least the homepage shows up? Or am I admitting that I'm addicted | to checking HN too many times a day? | h2odragon wrote: | Admitting you have a problem is the first step to recovery, | right? I'm sure I've heard that. Dunno how it's supposed to | help. | rossdavidh wrote: | Yes, that's what you're admitting. :) Not that you're alone in | that... | theshrike79 wrote: | Just don't type "news." and hit enter, it'll redirect to some | domain squatter crap and it'll be stuck in your autocomplete | for a while =) | breckinloggins wrote: | It's gotten so bad for me that I'm down to just "n". I think I | have a problem. | axaxs wrote: | LOL, same. In fact, every site I visit often is one char + | enter in the browser. With the exception of W, being east of | the Mississippi every station starts with W. | | That got me to thinking about 'first letter advantages.' If a | site has a first letter not currently in use, I'm much more | likely to visit it more often(mostly out of boredom, sure). | | V and X are still available if anyone is wondering. Zillow | got Z! | madjam002 wrote: | Oh man this hits home so much | jrockway wrote: | I used to use a web browser with Emacs keybindings, so | visiting a URL was the same keystroke as opening a file. I'd | type "C-x C-f news.ycombinator.com" quite regularly, and my | fingers still go to that "n" when I visit a file in Emacs. | slater wrote: | i was gonna say, check out that n00b that has to type all the | way to "news.y" for the browser autocomplete! :D | | /s | alvatech wrote: | I think I have tried to visit HN for more than 10 times in last 2 | hours and failed. This made me realize how much I'm addicted to | HN | IndySun wrote: | >more than 10 times in last 2 hours | | You could utilise the noprocrast option in your HN settings. | alvatech wrote: | Didn't know that this feature existed. I enabled it. | jorl17 wrote: | I keep 3 pinned tabs in my browser: | | - Reddit (my main source of addiction) | | - HackerNews (the second source of addiction) | | - Cookie Clicker (a rather recent addition that I'm slightly | embarassed of) | | At a point in time I also had facebook, but I've since stopped | going there (maybe once a week). | ghgdynb1 wrote: | I used HN to quit Reddit and I must say it's been a change | for the better. | wave100 wrote: | I'm not sure if this is still a thing, but at one point you | could open up a JS console on cookie clicker and run | game.ruinTheFun() to unlock everything. :) | ethbr0 wrote: | Just wait until you find out Reddit and Cookie Clicker have | the same endgame... | willis936 wrote: | Just cheat. It'll break the spell quickly. | | Also, check out universal paperclips if you haven't already. | it has a definite end. You likely won't play more than maybe | 10-20 hours. | mikewarot wrote: | I played Universal Paperclips, and converted a HectoVerse | (100 Universes) to paperclips. | | Long covid sucks. | StrictDabbler wrote: | Universal Paperclips is the cure for all other clicker | games. | | Once you've played a fair and truly exponential clicker | through a few times you can't tolerate the forced linearity | of a pay-to-win clicker app. | jorl17 wrote: | Alas, I am OP, the one with the Cookie Clicker tab, and I | came to Cookie Clicker after Universal Paperclips: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26469366 | | I have to say that UP was definitely a much better | experience. | SolarNet wrote: | Spaceplan is a pretty fun and slightly comedic play through | one as well http://spaceplan.click/ | jorl17 wrote: | I've played Universal Paperclips from start to finish 4 | times! I loved it. In fact, I loved it so much the last | time around that I wanted to have another game "somewhat | like it" in the background -- that's where the recent | Cookie Clicker tab came from. | | I always recommend Universal Paperclips to people who don't | like cookie clicker games, because I fell in love with it | the first time I tried it (heard of it from the Hello | Internet podcast) | marshmallow_12 wrote: | I was scared Dang had blocked me | app4soft wrote: | > _I think I have tried to visit HN for more than 10 times in | last 2 hours and failed._ | | Mee too! | | > _This made me realize how much I 'm addicted to HN_ | | I sought that my IP was shadow-banned by HN... | [deleted] | 2bitencryption wrote: | Azure AAD also had an outage at this time - perhaps linked in | some domino effect, or perhaps a coincidence? | | https://status.azure.com/en-us/status | SigmundA wrote: | Wondering this too, Teams started going came to HN to get | commentary and it was down too. | bombcar wrote: | Looks like it was a coincidence - unless Azure auth going down | shut off a rack in San Diego. | williesleg wrote: | Looks like a startup opportunity | koolba wrote: | The title should be updated to " _Productivity was up_ ". | j_walter wrote: | Not sure that is true...trying to find other info as to why HN | was down led to more productivity lost here | bombcar wrote: | Can't sign into Azure Portal, let's check HN, oh that's down | too, hmm is my internet up ... | | Huge rabbit hole | [deleted] | MattGaiser wrote: | With Azure also going down, lots of people were probably | scrambling to figure out what blew up. | drusepth wrote: | HN is one of the few sites I always keep zoomed-in (around 200%), | which led to me finding an interesting bug in Chrome while HN was | down: Chrome's internal "This site can't be reached" page uses | the zoom level of the site you would be visiting (if it were up), | rather than Chrome's default zoom. | | Screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/VwFtgQh.png | gkoberger wrote: | Is that really a bug? | taeric wrote: | Feels like it to me. I'd expect the zoom to be associated | with the site. | | Granted, I am probably importing old thoughts of it being a | sort of user provided style sheet. | forgetfulness wrote: | It'd make the zoom level you see jump up and down depending | on whether you lose your connection or regain it, this is | less jarring. | | You could say that Chrome is designed to tie the zoom level | to the viewport but I wouldn't count on this behavior | springing up from an underlying design and implementation | rather than it being a design choice for the user | experience. | hn_throwaway_99 wrote: | > I'd expect the zoom to be associated with the site. | | That's what the GP comment said happened: the zoom level | was the one associated with what they previously had set on | HN, and they expected it to be the opposite, the default | zoom level for the browser. | ncallaway wrote: | I would consider the browser's built-in page for "I | couldn't load news.ycombinator.com" to be a separate site | from "news.ycombinator.com". | taeric wrote: | But the site didn't load. My browser's not loading page | did. | | Is easier to see as broken by thinking of "how could I | set it so that my browser's error page has a default | zoom?" | derefr wrote: | But your browser's connection-failure page is considered | to come from the HTTP Origin of the site. It's like when | browsers receive a specific HTTP status-code (e.g. 500) | with no body, so they render a default HTML error | document. | | In both cases, those are the browser supplying a | _resource representation_ , while still technically being | on the _resource_ specified in the navigation bar. The | thing you 're seeing is an overridden representation of | the server's response. (Which, in this case, just | happened to be "no response.") | | It's almost exactly the same as how the server sending a | 304 gets the browser to load the document from cache. The | server's actual _response_ was a 304; but the browser 's | _representation_ of that response is the cached HTML DOM | it had laying around from the last 2xx resource- | representation it received "about" the same resource. | jxramos wrote: | I think the zoom level for Chrome is global per window at the | least, it's definitely not per tab. | graedus wrote: | it's per subdomain i think. | jxramos wrote: | oh indeed it is, wow that's subtle, always escaped me | where the focused setting applied. In that case yah | probably a bug. | jdoliner wrote: | It would be cool if zooming in / out on the T-Rex game caused | it to switch your character to larger / smaller dinosaurs. | losvedir wrote: | what's the t-rex game? | nkozyra wrote: | Game you get when the network is unavailable in chrome | Barrin92 wrote: | minigame built into chrome you can play when you're | offline, or alternatively go to chrome://dino | alisonatwork wrote: | Edge has one too at edge://surf | Shared404 wrote: | There's also an extracted version of it on Github for | those of us who use Firefox. | neom wrote: | hit space bar when offline in chrome, ps: addictive. | 1f60c wrote: | You're one of today's lucky 10,000! | sgrove wrote: | We have a version of it we adapted so that the t-rex has to | jump over npm packages as they're being published in real- | time! | | https://www.onegraph.com/docs/subscriptions.html (it'll | load in at the top of the page) | WalterSear wrote: | The Trex game really needs a meteor animation when the | connection is re-established. | denysvitali wrote: | Give this man a PM role at Google Chrome! | Gaelan wrote: | They even have the artwork! It's used when the game is | disabled by ~~fun-hating sysadmins~~ enterprise policy. | lukec11 wrote: | Firefox does the same, as I discovered - I don't know whether | it's a bug or intended functionality. | | (As an aside, I keep HN at 150% and old reddit at 120% - those | are the only 2 sites I have permanently zoomed) | redisman wrote: | It's part of the charm. Unusable on retina without zooming | (at least with my eyes). | _Microft wrote: | Either a bug or an over-eager member of the Mozilla UX team | had actually filed a bug with a _feature-parity Chrome_ tag | on it in BMO. | vram22 wrote: | Bug-parity. Not even odd parity. | vram22 wrote: | You could say I _pun_ ted. | jedberg wrote: | FWIW Safari doesn't have this bug (I too keep HN zoomed at 200% | for some reason). | chirag64 wrote: | I noticed the same behavior in Firefox as well. I wouldn't | consider this as a bug though | dkersten wrote: | I consider that a feature, not a bug. I typically do all | browsing zoomed in somewhat and I expect the "page can't load" | to also be zoomed. Or am I misunderstanding what you're saying? | interestica wrote: | Chrome used to store 'zoom level' for URLs even if you were in | incognito mode: and in plain text. Not sure if it still | does.... (if you changed the zoom level for a site while in | incognito from the default, it would save the value and the | associated URL). | marshmallow_12 wrote: | not anymore. it does it the other way 'round though, which | can be frustrating. | TeMPOraL wrote: | Same with Firefox. I have HN at 190%, and got startled by the | error message being so. big. and. weird. | RaketenStadt wrote: | The font-size on HN is barely readable, I'm working on an | accessible skin for the HN frontend that addresses this. | | I'm targeting WCAG 2.0. Keep an eye out for the "Show HN" | coming soon! | p1necone wrote: | Are you using a high dpi monitor but not using > 100% display | scaling in your OS or something? It's roughly the same size | as most other sites for me. | | (And pretty much all browsers have a zoom function for | exactly this, it feels like a totally separate frontend would | be more hassle to use than just ctrl + scroll wheel once) | neltnerb wrote: | I've found Linux to handle scaling pretty inconsistently; | I've got a 4K television I connect my computer to and if I | tell it to scale 200% in the monitor configuration most | things get scaled nicely, but random stuff (especially | proprietary stuff) doesn't know what to do. | | It worked much better to just tell it to output 1080p and | let my television scale it... less graphics memory too. I | still need to scale HN up relative to other sites in order | to read it though. | | If I compare the text of your comment to the text of an | article on npr.org it seems like about the same as the | difference between 9pt and 12pt, and they are using a serif | font that seems to be a lot easier to read. | | It's a style choice I guess? It seems like it would work | best on a large 1080p display, so maybe that's just what | the person who designed the layout was using. | RaketenStadt wrote: | No I'm not. The font-size for most text on the site is 10pt | and 9pt. | | Zoom doesn't fix line lengths of 1500 characters and | terrible color contrast. | | The link to the site guidelines is 7pt with a contrast that | fails WCAG 2.0. No wonder no one reads them. | TylerE wrote: | On Win10 with default settings, fonts on most sites are | totally comfortable to me. | | HN is readable - just - but it's definitely on the small | side. | | The complete lack of some sort of horizontal constraint | doesn't help either. 200 character lines are no bueno for | reading. | [deleted] | drusepth wrote: | It's the only site I have problems with, tbh. Stylesheet | says it's supposed to be 10pt (with comment text dropping | down to 9pt), which is even smaller than the too-small 12pt | font that gets recommended a lot. | Lammy wrote: | I've come to enjoy using a high DPI monitor without display | scaling as a way to counteract the huge amount of | whitespace in modern UIs, coupled with content zooming so | words are still actually readable :) | https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/zoom-page- | we/ | aritmo wrote: | There was a noticeable increase in productivity during the last | hour or so. | tpowell wrote: | I've been on this site 12+ years, and I don't ever remember it | being down. I assumed we were under nuclear attack. | southerntofu wrote: | Who needs so many 9's when there's actually interesting content | we keep coming back for? | ibraheemdev wrote: | It says a lot that @hnstatus has not tweeted since 2018. | dangwu wrote: | @HNStatus tweeted about the outage 3 hours ago. | TheRealNGenius wrote: | That's the point... | dangwu wrote: | Ah, my bad. I was wrongly interpreting OP's comment. | protomikron wrote: | Curious, what is the uptime of HN - is there some data about | that? | | My guess is around 99.9% ... but maybe that's too optimistic? | [deleted] | simonebrunozzi wrote: | Why too optimistic? | | Probably closer to 4 9s. | | With this outage of ~2 hours, we are at ~99.97% for this year. | (I am not aware of any other downtime during 2021) | | Rule of thumb (I strongly prefer minutes/year instead of 9s, to | get an immediate sense of how good the availability is): | | 99.9% : down for 525 minutes / year, or roughly ~10 hours | | 99.99% : down for 52 minutes / year, or roughly ~1 hour | | 99.999% : down for 5 minutes / year | ibraheemdev wrote: | > Back now. Got to write some code for a change... - 5:39 | | https://twitter.com/HNStatus/status/1371576822748487683 | tartoran wrote: | Seeing HN unresolved was a bit weird as it is the best performing | site I ever visit on my low bandwidth phone so several times I | thought the problem was on my end. But in the end it helped me | realize how frequently I dial into HN while it was down. I have a | bit of a problem and I think I need to turn on that no | procrastination flag on. | hnrodey wrote: | Had me quite confused because I'm also having home internet | issues. I was trying to get my laptop to switch to my mobile | hotspot and HN is one of the sites I used to test connectivity | because a) it's almost always available and b) loads very quick. | | A bit of a mindfuck trying to assess my actual internet | connectivity via a site that was also down : )_ | aasasd wrote: | The common method of testing connectivity is opening Bing. | Because it's guaranteed to not be cached in the browser. | nhylated wrote: | Found some use for Bing! | divbzero wrote: | Ditto. HN is so reliable and light on JavaScript that I | typically use it to test my connection. I thought my connection | was down earlier but guess this was the rare case where it was | HN. | | (Other comments suggest it was a network outage at M5 where HN | is hosted.) | blakehaswell wrote: | Me too. I was trying to browse HN on my phone earlier and my | first instinct was that my WiFi was having a moment. It's a | testament to how reliable HN is. | k__ wrote: | I was trying to read some news while training in the basement, | where I don't have very good Wi-Fi. Usually HN is one of the | pages that work better down there, haha. | coding123 wrote: | I never expect HN to be down... I asked my wife - hey is the | internet down? She said - no, it's working for me. I clicked on | another site and my mouth dropped. | deepsun wrote: | If only they used Kubernetes! /s | nickthemagicman wrote: | This site is so reliable, I thought my I.P. had gotten banned. | vincentmarle wrote: | We also had issues with our YC application earlier today, was | that related to this issue? | tomxor wrote: | Funny, my first thought was "oh no they've blacklisted VPNs", | can't remember when HN was ever down! | kenm47 wrote: | It's 3pm.... do you know where your servers are? | PhilosAccnting wrote: | I have a massive learning project[1], and I think 2/3 of my "to | get through as soon as sensible" content is news.ycombinator | links. | | Needless to say, this site is my own personal StackOverflow, and | I think there's something about ingratitude bouncing around in my | mind somewhere. | | [1]https://github.com/PhilosAccounting/ts-learning | bfostbfostbfost wrote: | Wow, looks like a wealth of knowledge. Forked it for myself, | only for reference, hope that is ok. Just seems like a ton of | great info that I'd love to comb through myself. Cheers. | PhilosAccnting wrote: | Totally okay, though I added the PDFs/videos to gitignore. | I'm mildly paranoid about IPs[1]! | | [1]https://gainedin.site/ip/ | bfostbfostbfost wrote: | Makes sense, well I will be following the TechSplained | project, good luck! | 0xbadcafebee wrote: | Since I couldn't get to HN, I wrote up how to make the site | resilient to outages: | https://gist.github.com/peterwwillis/ce2bfaba7fc72e4af44c281... | | tl;dr 1 server x 2 providers, different regions, replicate | content | [deleted] | [deleted] | tempestn wrote: | Is this related to the big Microsoft outage? | enobrev wrote: | The one time I'm actually reading HN for actually relevant | information for actual work, it's down for half a day. Made for a | great excuse to take a nap. | JasonFruit wrote: | I thought pg posted "Memphis". | fotta wrote: | Something that I learned from this is that HN has a status | Twitter. Rarely used though, which is a testament to the team. | | https://twitter.com/HNStatus/status/1371525940656803848?s=20 | EasyTiger_ wrote: | Only they never posted anything during the outage there | fotta wrote: | Unsure what you mean there, as the linked tweet was from 4h | ago. | edub wrote: | they did, if you click on the link in the post you replied | to, you'll see it is a link to their post from today about | the outage. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-03-15 23:00 UTC)