[HN Gopher] Show HN: CryptoTask - a 0% fee freelance platform po... ___________________________________________________________________ Show HN: CryptoTask - a 0% fee freelance platform powered by blockchain Author : VukT Score : 112 points Date : 2021-03-16 16:31 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (about.cryptotask.org) (TXT) w3m dump (about.cryptotask.org) | vmception wrote: | This reminds me, I got contacted by a freelancing platform the | other day that had a "token" too, it was called Braintrust. | | Their token didn't even trade because they were waiting to "go | public" and I said "like, on the Nasdaq" and they said no, with a | token sale of the token that doesn't exist yet. But their | dashboard does give you a token which you cannot use and cannot | withdraw, no different than points in CandyCrush. The people | there genuinely believe in the token perk and blockchain aspect | though, but don't seem to realize that it doesn't pass basic | checkmarks of legitimacy which can be fixed by simply issuing it | and throwing a liquidity pool o Uniswap like you guys did. | | They're also doubling as a placement agency and "sell yourself" | platform. | | Leads me to believe they have no idea what they're doing, | validated by reviews about them on other platforms. | omarish wrote: | Why do you need a token? | slonso wrote: | token is like company shares. revenue streams (such as escrow) | are connected to token burning, effectively paying out | dividends to token holders | hanniabu wrote: | Better control over tokenomics and incentive structure | matkoniecz wrote: | > 0% fee | | This is untrue. On landing page there is already | | > Fees are only up to 3% | | If you scroll to the diagram ( | https://thumb.tildacdn.com/tild3530-3537-4532-b434-373030613... ) | it shows 30% high fee. | | What is ironic given earlier | | > Pain points: Huge platform fees (30%+) | | I wonder how much goes to various hidden fees caused by | blockchain inefficiency (gas? transaction fees)? | dmautz wrote: | I looked at the available writers on the platform. They all have | broken english in their descriptions. I know it's hard to set up | a marketplace but you might want to make sure your early | providers have at least the bare minimum of skill someone would | hire | Rule35 wrote: | It could be worth finding good performers from other sites and | subsidizing them on the new platform to provide the initial | pool. | VukT wrote: | This will change as we drive more freelancers to the platform. | There's a review/rating system in place which will allow for | quality of freelancers to show over time. | verdverm wrote: | Like how Upwork "works"? | VukT wrote: | There's an issue, where high quality freelancer, doesn't | want to apply for low paying/quality jobs to build | credibility on the platform. Potential solutions are in | development - one having to do with a blockchain identity | _hence the partnership with | Hyperminehttps://cryptotask.medium.com/new-partnership- | cryptotask-hyp... _ | fuckmeamadeus wrote: | this is plain awesome, I've been looking for such platform with | decent bc related jobs, I see there are quite a few, are there | any restrictions to becoming a freelancer on the platform? | geographical or otherwise? | VukT wrote: | Anyone who wants to work, can work. That's the idea behind | platform. There are no restrictions whatsoever. | | I can provide personal example, where I couldn't find a work | because I had to rely on third payment providers, who Serbian | citizens, at the time I was 16 couldn't use. That was around 7 | years ago. | VukT wrote: | Here's quite technical but old whitepaper for anyone who's | showing interest in CTASK and dispute mechanism | https://drive.google.com/file/d/13zuCikwuh3Ns8fCEUYlU1YE_PnL... | rawtxapp wrote: | Nice to see different use cases, what's the advantage of paying | with your token vs using a stablecoin for payment? | VukT wrote: | Successfully completed tasks are paid out in stablecoins, DAI | being a primary example, as backbone of the CryptoTask is | AEternity blockchain with DAI having highest liquidity on AE. | CTask has a different utility and you may read about it at | https://cryptotask.medium.com/ctask-token-utility-d4aac4ca69... | Rule35 wrote: | Good question. Nice to see that they prioritize stablecoins, | it's what makes the most sense for general users. Anything that | insists you use their utility token is showing you a red flag. | [deleted] | Grustaf wrote: | What exactly is the role of the blockchain here? | whoknew1122 wrote: | It sounds cool. They're probably going to have ML and AI for | their reputation system too. | parhamn wrote: | This looks really cool. Congrats on the launch! | | I've always wondered how blockchain companies consider branding | around their tech vs their outcomes. Like there are a ton of | great outcomes here for using blockchain tech, but I find | "crpyto" products intimidating to use, even as a techy. | VukT wrote: | I see where you are coming from. Eventually, CryptoTask will be | seen as a regular freelance platform with low fees and accent | on security for onsite deals. Technology, which does scare away | potential clients, provides that. In case of a dispute, you | won't spend days / weeks resolving the issue, it'll be | automated and the outcome will be decided by real users. | jfk13 wrote: | > it'll be automated and the outcome will be decided by real | users | | I don't understand how both these things can hold. Unless the | "real users" are automated? | slonso wrote: | Automated in the sense that there is no company resolving | disputes, but are resolved in a decentralized manner by | other users who are selected automatically | artur_makly wrote: | devil is in the details. you would need highly skilled | and experienced arbitrators here for each vertical. | leifg wrote: | For me as a freelancer the fundamental question was always: "how | much money will be in my bank account when I take this job". Yes | there is risk of non payment and hidden fees that I don't | anticipate but the main driver was the rate of the gig. | | I was not able to find that information on the platform looking | at the jobs tab. Most of the value was "negotiable". | | But leaving that aside, it seems that "value" is not what will be | in my bank account. | | And from the overview it seems like the fee is only 3% which | implies I get to keep 97% of the money. But further down there is | a diagram that puts "70%" next to "Freelancer" so I'm not even | sure how much percent of a job I get. | IncRnd wrote: | I went to the site to look for cryptography related jobs. The | shady postings without payment information, qualifications, or | any other real information all made sense when I saw that the | "crypto" was for cryptocurrencies. | | One post wanted someone to create a coin in a month, but the | rate was "negotiable". Hucksters (the posters). | zikzak wrote: | Do you get most work through marketplaces like this or via | people you wish have a connection with? I'm really interested | in knowing if you could make a "good" living on these | marketplaces if you want to sustain a middle class lifestyle as | an adult with kids in Canada or the US (let's leave it the most | expensive real estate regions). I briefly reviewed this space | several years ago and didn't think it would pay enough to even | remotely compete with more traditional employment, especially | when you consider factors like "doing your taxes" and | healthcare. | acruns wrote: | I am a full-time freelancer (cloud arc not dev). I started | cold turkey last April when my firm lost tons of gigs. I | started on market places and through that built relationships | with other firms that didn't have a cloud architect and they | have come back to me with additional work. I have also landed | gigs through contacts. Once I got the ball moving it has been | mostly non-stop. The taxes and insurance aren't as bad as you | might think. The back end work of invoices, taxes, expenses, | contracts, so on can all be managed in one app so it isn't a | nightmare. It's nice to be able to spot concerning projects | and turn them down as opposed to being forced into a project | you know is going to be a nightmare. I bill @ 110/hr with no | problem. It has also let me spend time giving away my | services to some non-profits and startups. I don't think it's | right for everyone but I enjoy it. | rurp wrote: | Thank you for sharing. I would love to know which app you | use for invoices, contracts, etc. | leifg wrote: | In the meantime I stopped freelancing but I had 5 longer | running gigs in total (+ a few shorter term gigs). | | All of these gigs I got through different channels. | | Only 1 was through a platform, but it was one of those higher | playing platforms where you had to go through an application | process which included building a project without being paid | (I was living in the US while I was working through this | platform) | | So in essence: I think it's possible but not on all | platforms. | ssijak wrote: | The platform you are talking about is probably Toptal | https://www.toptal.com#connect-unmatched-coders-now ? | | I work through them and am very satisfied. Though I do not | live in the US, rates I can get through Toptal are much | higher than local rates. And if you are from US you can set | even higher rates. Also there are US only jobs. So I guess | if you dont live in the expensive part of the US it is | doable. | [deleted] | VukT wrote: | We are about to resolve content quality issues in future | updates. CryptoTask platform would take 0% if you don't use | escrow system, giving you 100% of completed task value. If you | decide to use an escrow system, platform would take 3% from | total task value. About 70% - There's affiliate system, which | allows for freelancer who can't find a job themselves, rely on | a headhunter type of users, who'd connect freelancer with a | client. 10% from the total task value goes to the platform, | where 20% of the task value is meant for a headhunter. As both | systems are still in development (development roadmap can be | found no https://about.cryptotask.org/), percentage of task | value going to headhunter could potentially be manually set. | leifg wrote: | I still don't get how the platform would take only 3% but I | only get 70% of the value. | VukT wrote: | You'd get 97% of the job value if you use an escrow system. | If you are a freelancer, who can't find a job and you rely | on a headhunter, in that case you'd get 70% (which is to be | discussed). If you don't use either of those, you'd get | 100% of the job value. | renewiltord wrote: | They're value-added features: | | * You get 100% by default | | * To get escrow services, you pay 3% of that | | * If you want someone to find jobs for you, you pay 30% to | them | temp8964 wrote: | I think this explanation makes more sense. The other | explanation, although mathematically equivalent, sounds | weird. | cercatrova wrote: | They just explained it, it's three different models: | | - keep 100% green you don't use their escrow system | | - keep 97% if you do use their escrow system | | - keep 70% if you need someone to find you jobs | kulikalov wrote: | I see that you have less than one job posted per day. Am I | missing something? | | What price range are you aiming at? For instance, fiverr is for | tiny gigs, upwork - for low to mid paying jobs. What is your | range? | VukT wrote: | Jobs have no value limit as we don't depend on a third party | payment providers and limitations which come with them. Our | focus is on becoming the leading freelance platform for | blockchain jobs. As for on platform activity you may follow it | at | https://www.aeknow.org/contract/detail/ct_X3szYGp5irejPsowXp... | as current representation of listed jobs isn't accurate, | because filled job positions get removed from the list. This | will be addressed in the following updates. There's a Croatian | section of the platform, as we acquired freelance.hr , with | regional jobs. | hanniabu wrote: | Do you plan to move to Optimism when that launches this | month? From what I understand, little to no changes are | needed on your the codebase. You should be able to just use | their compiler and deploy. | kulikalov wrote: | Can you run a quick query in your database and answer my | questions? | | There are plenty of blockchain jobs out there on other | platforms. Why should I invest time in your platform? I'm | looking for short contracts that are paying over $200 per | hour. Is this something your platform can offer? | fuckmeamadeus wrote: | I feel this one is growing fast, most of the good jobs get | filled in 10 minutes, I've been following the activity for | the past few hours... | slonso wrote: | you can apply to https://app.cryptotask.org/en/tasks/872 or | https://app.cryptotask.org/en/tasks/869 ..yea the price in | this case is set to negotiable, but on most platforms even | if you have set price it is usually negotiated before work | starts, so nothing different here. Also as mentioned, there | is significant traction on Croatian section, international | section will have more and more jobs as we are focusing on | growth now, so great time to build reputation as a | freelancer | g00gler wrote: | I'm interested in hearing about this too. | woile wrote: | This looks super nice!! | | How's the process for setting a task to "completed"? Can that be | exploited? How does the Automated jury process work? | VukT wrote: | Here's a quote from a Forbes article: "With a review system | like that of CryptoTask, reviewers are token holders that stake | an amount equal to the task value that they are putting | themselves forward for as a potential reviewer. It means that | being a stakeholder, you already have a chance of being | selected. That chance is directly proportional to that | individual's stake, so this prevents sybil attacks. | | If they do, however, get randomly selected to be a reviewer and | the task goes into dispute, they are required to cast a vote on | whether or not they think the task was actually completed. If a | reviewer votes against the consensus or does not vote at all, | they do not lose any certain percentage of their staked amount. | | Some of the benefits of such a system include: | Selection happens in secret to prevent reviewers from | influencing the consensus through collusion. A two- | stage voting process (secret commit and then reveal) means | reviewers can't wait to see how other reviewers voted and then | just go with the consensus. Reviewers would generally | be professionals with a relatively large token stake and | therefore in a good position to escalate and vote on a | dispute." | | This would sum up dispute system with incentive for reviewers | being 10% of the task value split among them. | theamk wrote: | Could you elaborate on this? | | > If a reviewer votes against the consensus or does not vote | at all, they do not lose any certain percentage of their | staked amount. | | Does that mean they don't lose anything? Or that they lose | some amount, but that amount is not a simple fraction of | staked amount? | VukT wrote: | As for the actual Forbes article I keep mentioning https://ww | w.forbes.com/sites/davidpetersson/2018/10/27/the-p... | Imnimo wrote: | I was expecting the whitepaper to explain how the technology | works, but it seems to just be a business plan with very little | detail on what the system actually does. | VukT wrote: | Thank you for the feedback! We'll be updating onsite content | ASAP. | | Here's a post containing two medium posts and additional | explanation on backbone of the platform. | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26480748 | plumeria wrote: | How does the automated jury work? | VukT wrote: | Here's a link to the reply I don't paste another wall of | text: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26480945 | VukT wrote: | Here is an old whitepaper with technical explanations | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26484040 | timdaub wrote: | Hey, | | great job on the landing page, it looks good! | | Two questions: | | - How are you coping with expensive gas on main net right now? | | - Do you have a document describing how your token works on a | technical level. Like a spec or so. | | Thanks and good luck! | VukT wrote: | There are a couple of medium posts describing technical | background of the platform and token itself such as: | https://cryptotask.medium.com/cryptotask-combines-defr-and-d... | https://cryptotask.medium.com/technical-background-of-crypto... | | We are running on AEternity blockchain | (https://aeternity.com/), making gas fees sufficiently low. | There have been 19.5k transactions | https://www.aeknow.org/contract/detail/ct_X3szYGp5irejPsowXp... | and we are alive :) | timdaub wrote: | On AEternity! Wow, I've participated in their ICO back then. | | Thanks for the details, I'll take a look. | hanniabu wrote: | Ooof, didn't know you were running on AEternity. That in | itself would be a no for me. I would definitely love to | participate if there was a decision to move to ETH when | Optimism is released. | Rule35 wrote: | Why? The blockchain technologically, the UI difficulty of | another chain, or the currency? | hanniabu wrote: | Because of all innovation is happening on Ethereum, so | yes I don't want to deal with the UX difficulty of using | another chain. Also I wouldn't want to invest (both time | and $) into a project on a 2nd rate platform. Not to | mention it doesn't reflect well on the project to not | consider the network effect nor the planned L2 solutions | that are here to address scalability. I highly recommend | looking into Optimism. I'm not sure what the difference | of AE and ETH EVM is (forked?), but I know that if you | have a project in Solidity then you can launch on | Optimism with little to no changes (just use their | compiler). | vmception wrote: | who cares? they are just dropping junk storage onto | random blockchain enthusiast's computers for basically | free instead of AWS and are clearly paying their talent | with a token that trades on the Ethereum network via | Uniswap. Would you even notice? | | You aren't a developer for them so you don't have to | worry about Erlang, their token doesn't need an Aeternity | wallet if it trades on Ethereum, and even if you do earn | their token on the Aeternity blockchain they could just | offer a bridge on their own website. | | Let me know if I missed something, how is this your | problem? | T0Bi wrote: | Because on Ethereum, they could connect/be integrated | with other projects. As most dapps are on Ethereum and | the network effect is probably the most important factor | in crypto, this will continue to be the case. | | Therefore it's highly unlikely that CryptoTask will ever | have integrations with existing or potential new Dapps. | | This might not be relevant right now, but it certainly | will be in the future. | vmception wrote: | We are talking about a freelancer marketplace dumping | state data on random nodes and miners computers. What | could possibly be the integration here? | | Their erc20 token on Ethereum can integrate with whatever | you want | | I think people are conflating things | imaginationra wrote: | No Ethereum network- no go for me as well. | vmception wrote: | Their token trades on Uniswap so what difference does that | make for you? Who cares where they dump their junk data? | terhechte wrote: | Not the author, but it should be possible for them to move to a | Layer 2 solution soon. Examples are Optimism, Fuel, or | Loopring. They're all still in beta though (I think) | anonymouszx wrote: | Hi. This looks interesting. Have you considered integrating with | Kleros for dispute resolution? And if not, why not? | slonso wrote: | Kleros has some complexities that we dont need, while we need | some things that Kleros doesnt have, ie potential reviewers are | not necessarily just token holders, but other users with | reputation above certain level etc. | dgellow wrote: | How does that work from a tax point of view? I guess you have to | pay income tax when you receive the tokens for the job, then | capital gain tax when you convert to USD/EUR? | Rule35 wrote: | For this sort of contractual work they'll probably bill and pay | in an algorithmic stablecoin which is intended to track the | dollar. | | Regardless of the taxable nature of such a thing (which may or | may not be a security because it's designed _not_ to change | value based on the actions of others) it should simplify the | issue by at least not changing wildly from day to day. | dgellow wrote: | A stablecoin isn't different from other crypto assets from a | tax point of view (at least in the US and Germany). | Rule35 wrote: | I don't think any of it has really been tested, but because | two of the Howey test's four provisions are "with an | expectation of profit" and "on the work of others" and | don't seem to fit something intended to not create a profit | it seems like there will be a significant difference in | eventual treatment. | rmah wrote: | Whether the crypto you receive in compensation is | considered a security or not will not matter from an | income tax perspective in the US. If you were paid in | stock, you would owe taxes on the compensation at the | price of the stock at the time you received it. You might | also be subject to capital gains tax if you sell the | asset (stock or security-crypto) if you sell it with a | cost basis calculated at the time you received it. | | IOW, if you got paid say 10 ETH, priced at $1800/ETH, you | would owe income tax for $18,000 that year. It does not | matter if you sell the ETH or not. It does not matter if | ETH is considered a security or not. You pay taxes on the | value of compensation whether the compensation is in USD, | stock, ETH or chickens. If you subsequently sold the ETH | for $2000/ETH, you would then owe capital gains taxes on | 10 * (2000 - 1800) = $2000 of capital gains. Possibly | short term, possibly long term depending on when you sell | it. | verdverm wrote: | The IRS has a nice FAQ here | https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international- | taxpayers/freq... | | Your analysis should be correct based on my understanding | of the tax treatments | nomy99 wrote: | i signed up now I'm expecting moneys | yowlingcat wrote: | How do you handle fraud, feedback and dispute resolution? | VukT wrote: | At the moment - tasks are manually approved. This is bound to | change as escrow system gets developed. You can find | development roadmap found about.cryptotask.org Feedback is | added with after a task is successfully completed, which over | time would create high quality freelancers from ones who don't | perform so well. | | As for the dispute system - I'll copy previously provided | answer taken from Forbes article: "With a review system like | that of CryptoTask, reviewers are token holders that stake an | amount equal to the task value that they are putting themselves | forward for as a potential reviewer. It means that being a | stakeholder, you already have a chance of being selected. That | chance is directly proportional to that individual's stake, so | this prevents sybil attacks. | | If they do, however, get randomly selected to be a reviewer and | the task goes into dispute, they are required to cast a vote on | whether or not they think the task was actually completed. If a | reviewer votes against the consensus or does not vote at all, | they do not lose any certain percentage of their staked amount. | | Some of the benefits of such a system include: | Selection happens in secret to prevent reviewers from | influencing the consensus through collusion. A two- | stage voting process (secret commit and then reveal) means | reviewers can't wait to see how other reviewers voted and then | just go with the consensus. Reviewers would generally | be professionals with a relatively large token stake and | therefore in a good position to escalate and vote on a | dispute." | | This would sum up dispute system with incentive for reviewers | being 10% of the task value split among them. | yowlingcat wrote: | Very cool. Although there's still challenge on the human side | on /seeding/ the right high quality initial network, I can | see something like this really being able to scale. The | question of course is how well this conceptually scales with | task complexity -- obviously, something like an Amazon MTurk | task is one thing and probably the appropriate existing | system for a system like this to supplant. | | With that said, how does this scale to handling more complex | tasks that require more back and forth? There's the "fuzzy" | area of problem solving as tasks get larger and less clearly | defined. Is that out of scope for now to keep focus is on the | low hanging fruit? | | I would love to see something like this completely deprecate | MTurk and low wage Upwork. | atlasunshrugged wrote: | This is pretty neat but can you help me understand the core | difference between this and Braintrust? How are you making this | easy/trustworthy for the demand side of the platform to use? My | learnings from a few years in the space (for context, I was early | at Gigster, then went to Germany to help build a freelance dev | platform for the EU market and now am at Tribe.AI where we | specialize in AI focused freelance work with a managed | marketplace) is that at the high end especially clients and | freelancers are willing to have huge premiums for middlemen that | alleviate headaches, take risk off their own plates, and can | better manage client relationships. | [deleted] | slonso wrote: | There is a reputation system, so it is possible to see | freelancer's history of past jobs and ratings. Also escrow can | be used, so you wouldnt need to pay if job wasnt done according | to specs. Dispute resolution being smart contract based is more | transparent, and it is also great for ppl who prefer using | crypto payments | lxgr wrote: | > 0% fee | | > Uniswap pair | | With current gas prices, this unfortunately seems like a | contradiction. | hanniabu wrote: | Gas prices are a given so generally aren't listed as a fee | since it's intrinsic to the network. | georgyo wrote: | Can you imagine if your bank charged you to write a check? | | I don't understand how people are okay with gas prices being | a given. | Rule35 wrote: | Because gas is like the cost of the paper. I wouldn't want | my bank selling a fancier cheque just to charge more, but I | do expect to cover the costs of the necessary anti-fraud | features, etc. Similar to the cost of the code to verify | the transaction. | | But yes, it should be lower where possible. Both by code | optimization and blockchain/architecture choices. | remram wrote: | When my bank says they're sending me a new checkbook for | free, I definitely do not expect to pay the price of the | paper or anti-fraud features. Do you? | oarsinsync wrote: | > Can you imagine if your bank charged you to write a | check? | | My bank charges me to use an ATM, and to send international | transfers, so it doesn't take a lot of imagination. | hanniabu wrote: | Network fees for blockchain are the equivalence of taxes. | People aren't okay with taxes, but they're the price you | need to pay to participate in the financial system. | VukT wrote: | Blockchain fees are always there. However, there are solutions | - such as NEAR (near.org) who reduce them. They claim to have | "10K x lower cost per transaction than Ethereum" Regular client | wouldn't feel those. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-03-16 23:01 UTC)