[HN Gopher] Show HN: CryptoTask - a 0% fee freelance platform po...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: CryptoTask - a 0% fee freelance platform powered by
       blockchain
        
       Author : VukT
       Score  : 112 points
       Date   : 2021-03-16 16:31 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (about.cryptotask.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (about.cryptotask.org)
        
       | vmception wrote:
       | This reminds me, I got contacted by a freelancing platform the
       | other day that had a "token" too, it was called Braintrust.
       | 
       | Their token didn't even trade because they were waiting to "go
       | public" and I said "like, on the Nasdaq" and they said no, with a
       | token sale of the token that doesn't exist yet. But their
       | dashboard does give you a token which you cannot use and cannot
       | withdraw, no different than points in CandyCrush. The people
       | there genuinely believe in the token perk and blockchain aspect
       | though, but don't seem to realize that it doesn't pass basic
       | checkmarks of legitimacy which can be fixed by simply issuing it
       | and throwing a liquidity pool o Uniswap like you guys did.
       | 
       | They're also doubling as a placement agency and "sell yourself"
       | platform.
       | 
       | Leads me to believe they have no idea what they're doing,
       | validated by reviews about them on other platforms.
        
       | omarish wrote:
       | Why do you need a token?
        
         | slonso wrote:
         | token is like company shares. revenue streams (such as escrow)
         | are connected to token burning, effectively paying out
         | dividends to token holders
        
         | hanniabu wrote:
         | Better control over tokenomics and incentive structure
        
       | matkoniecz wrote:
       | > 0% fee
       | 
       | This is untrue. On landing page there is already
       | 
       | > Fees are only up to 3%
       | 
       | If you scroll to the diagram (
       | https://thumb.tildacdn.com/tild3530-3537-4532-b434-373030613... )
       | it shows 30% high fee.
       | 
       | What is ironic given earlier
       | 
       | > Pain points: Huge platform fees (30%+)
       | 
       | I wonder how much goes to various hidden fees caused by
       | blockchain inefficiency (gas? transaction fees)?
        
       | dmautz wrote:
       | I looked at the available writers on the platform. They all have
       | broken english in their descriptions. I know it's hard to set up
       | a marketplace but you might want to make sure your early
       | providers have at least the bare minimum of skill someone would
       | hire
        
         | Rule35 wrote:
         | It could be worth finding good performers from other sites and
         | subsidizing them on the new platform to provide the initial
         | pool.
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | This will change as we drive more freelancers to the platform.
         | There's a review/rating system in place which will allow for
         | quality of freelancers to show over time.
        
           | verdverm wrote:
           | Like how Upwork "works"?
        
             | VukT wrote:
             | There's an issue, where high quality freelancer, doesn't
             | want to apply for low paying/quality jobs to build
             | credibility on the platform. Potential solutions are in
             | development - one having to do with a blockchain identity
             | _hence the partnership with
             | Hyperminehttps://cryptotask.medium.com/new-partnership-
             | cryptotask-hyp... _
        
       | fuckmeamadeus wrote:
       | this is plain awesome, I've been looking for such platform with
       | decent bc related jobs, I see there are quite a few, are there
       | any restrictions to becoming a freelancer on the platform?
       | geographical or otherwise?
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | Anyone who wants to work, can work. That's the idea behind
         | platform. There are no restrictions whatsoever.
         | 
         | I can provide personal example, where I couldn't find a work
         | because I had to rely on third payment providers, who Serbian
         | citizens, at the time I was 16 couldn't use. That was around 7
         | years ago.
        
       | VukT wrote:
       | Here's quite technical but old whitepaper for anyone who's
       | showing interest in CTASK and dispute mechanism
       | https://drive.google.com/file/d/13zuCikwuh3Ns8fCEUYlU1YE_PnL...
        
       | rawtxapp wrote:
       | Nice to see different use cases, what's the advantage of paying
       | with your token vs using a stablecoin for payment?
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | Successfully completed tasks are paid out in stablecoins, DAI
         | being a primary example, as backbone of the CryptoTask is
         | AEternity blockchain with DAI having highest liquidity on AE.
         | CTask has a different utility and you may read about it at
         | https://cryptotask.medium.com/ctask-token-utility-d4aac4ca69...
        
         | Rule35 wrote:
         | Good question. Nice to see that they prioritize stablecoins,
         | it's what makes the most sense for general users. Anything that
         | insists you use their utility token is showing you a red flag.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | Grustaf wrote:
       | What exactly is the role of the blockchain here?
        
         | whoknew1122 wrote:
         | It sounds cool. They're probably going to have ML and AI for
         | their reputation system too.
        
       | parhamn wrote:
       | This looks really cool. Congrats on the launch!
       | 
       | I've always wondered how blockchain companies consider branding
       | around their tech vs their outcomes. Like there are a ton of
       | great outcomes here for using blockchain tech, but I find
       | "crpyto" products intimidating to use, even as a techy.
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | I see where you are coming from. Eventually, CryptoTask will be
         | seen as a regular freelance platform with low fees and accent
         | on security for onsite deals. Technology, which does scare away
         | potential clients, provides that. In case of a dispute, you
         | won't spend days / weeks resolving the issue, it'll be
         | automated and the outcome will be decided by real users.
        
           | jfk13 wrote:
           | > it'll be automated and the outcome will be decided by real
           | users
           | 
           | I don't understand how both these things can hold. Unless the
           | "real users" are automated?
        
             | slonso wrote:
             | Automated in the sense that there is no company resolving
             | disputes, but are resolved in a decentralized manner by
             | other users who are selected automatically
        
               | artur_makly wrote:
               | devil is in the details. you would need highly skilled
               | and experienced arbitrators here for each vertical.
        
       | leifg wrote:
       | For me as a freelancer the fundamental question was always: "how
       | much money will be in my bank account when I take this job". Yes
       | there is risk of non payment and hidden fees that I don't
       | anticipate but the main driver was the rate of the gig.
       | 
       | I was not able to find that information on the platform looking
       | at the jobs tab. Most of the value was "negotiable".
       | 
       | But leaving that aside, it seems that "value" is not what will be
       | in my bank account.
       | 
       | And from the overview it seems like the fee is only 3% which
       | implies I get to keep 97% of the money. But further down there is
       | a diagram that puts "70%" next to "Freelancer" so I'm not even
       | sure how much percent of a job I get.
        
         | IncRnd wrote:
         | I went to the site to look for cryptography related jobs. The
         | shady postings without payment information, qualifications, or
         | any other real information all made sense when I saw that the
         | "crypto" was for cryptocurrencies.
         | 
         | One post wanted someone to create a coin in a month, but the
         | rate was "negotiable". Hucksters (the posters).
        
         | zikzak wrote:
         | Do you get most work through marketplaces like this or via
         | people you wish have a connection with? I'm really interested
         | in knowing if you could make a "good" living on these
         | marketplaces if you want to sustain a middle class lifestyle as
         | an adult with kids in Canada or the US (let's leave it the most
         | expensive real estate regions). I briefly reviewed this space
         | several years ago and didn't think it would pay enough to even
         | remotely compete with more traditional employment, especially
         | when you consider factors like "doing your taxes" and
         | healthcare.
        
           | acruns wrote:
           | I am a full-time freelancer (cloud arc not dev). I started
           | cold turkey last April when my firm lost tons of gigs. I
           | started on market places and through that built relationships
           | with other firms that didn't have a cloud architect and they
           | have come back to me with additional work. I have also landed
           | gigs through contacts. Once I got the ball moving it has been
           | mostly non-stop. The taxes and insurance aren't as bad as you
           | might think. The back end work of invoices, taxes, expenses,
           | contracts, so on can all be managed in one app so it isn't a
           | nightmare. It's nice to be able to spot concerning projects
           | and turn them down as opposed to being forced into a project
           | you know is going to be a nightmare. I bill @ 110/hr with no
           | problem. It has also let me spend time giving away my
           | services to some non-profits and startups. I don't think it's
           | right for everyone but I enjoy it.
        
             | rurp wrote:
             | Thank you for sharing. I would love to know which app you
             | use for invoices, contracts, etc.
        
           | leifg wrote:
           | In the meantime I stopped freelancing but I had 5 longer
           | running gigs in total (+ a few shorter term gigs).
           | 
           | All of these gigs I got through different channels.
           | 
           | Only 1 was through a platform, but it was one of those higher
           | playing platforms where you had to go through an application
           | process which included building a project without being paid
           | (I was living in the US while I was working through this
           | platform)
           | 
           | So in essence: I think it's possible but not on all
           | platforms.
        
             | ssijak wrote:
             | The platform you are talking about is probably Toptal
             | https://www.toptal.com#connect-unmatched-coders-now ?
             | 
             | I work through them and am very satisfied. Though I do not
             | live in the US, rates I can get through Toptal are much
             | higher than local rates. And if you are from US you can set
             | even higher rates. Also there are US only jobs. So I guess
             | if you dont live in the expensive part of the US it is
             | doable.
        
               | [deleted]
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | We are about to resolve content quality issues in future
         | updates. CryptoTask platform would take 0% if you don't use
         | escrow system, giving you 100% of completed task value. If you
         | decide to use an escrow system, platform would take 3% from
         | total task value. About 70% - There's affiliate system, which
         | allows for freelancer who can't find a job themselves, rely on
         | a headhunter type of users, who'd connect freelancer with a
         | client. 10% from the total task value goes to the platform,
         | where 20% of the task value is meant for a headhunter. As both
         | systems are still in development (development roadmap can be
         | found no https://about.cryptotask.org/), percentage of task
         | value going to headhunter could potentially be manually set.
        
           | leifg wrote:
           | I still don't get how the platform would take only 3% but I
           | only get 70% of the value.
        
             | VukT wrote:
             | You'd get 97% of the job value if you use an escrow system.
             | If you are a freelancer, who can't find a job and you rely
             | on a headhunter, in that case you'd get 70% (which is to be
             | discussed). If you don't use either of those, you'd get
             | 100% of the job value.
        
             | renewiltord wrote:
             | They're value-added features:
             | 
             | * You get 100% by default
             | 
             | * To get escrow services, you pay 3% of that
             | 
             | * If you want someone to find jobs for you, you pay 30% to
             | them
        
               | temp8964 wrote:
               | I think this explanation makes more sense. The other
               | explanation, although mathematically equivalent, sounds
               | weird.
        
             | cercatrova wrote:
             | They just explained it, it's three different models:
             | 
             | - keep 100% green you don't use their escrow system
             | 
             | - keep 97% if you do use their escrow system
             | 
             | - keep 70% if you need someone to find you jobs
        
       | kulikalov wrote:
       | I see that you have less than one job posted per day. Am I
       | missing something?
       | 
       | What price range are you aiming at? For instance, fiverr is for
       | tiny gigs, upwork - for low to mid paying jobs. What is your
       | range?
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | Jobs have no value limit as we don't depend on a third party
         | payment providers and limitations which come with them. Our
         | focus is on becoming the leading freelance platform for
         | blockchain jobs. As for on platform activity you may follow it
         | at
         | https://www.aeknow.org/contract/detail/ct_X3szYGp5irejPsowXp...
         | as current representation of listed jobs isn't accurate,
         | because filled job positions get removed from the list. This
         | will be addressed in the following updates. There's a Croatian
         | section of the platform, as we acquired freelance.hr , with
         | regional jobs.
        
           | hanniabu wrote:
           | Do you plan to move to Optimism when that launches this
           | month? From what I understand, little to no changes are
           | needed on your the codebase. You should be able to just use
           | their compiler and deploy.
        
           | kulikalov wrote:
           | Can you run a quick query in your database and answer my
           | questions?
           | 
           | There are plenty of blockchain jobs out there on other
           | platforms. Why should I invest time in your platform? I'm
           | looking for short contracts that are paying over $200 per
           | hour. Is this something your platform can offer?
        
             | fuckmeamadeus wrote:
             | I feel this one is growing fast, most of the good jobs get
             | filled in 10 minutes, I've been following the activity for
             | the past few hours...
        
             | slonso wrote:
             | you can apply to https://app.cryptotask.org/en/tasks/872 or
             | https://app.cryptotask.org/en/tasks/869 ..yea the price in
             | this case is set to negotiable, but on most platforms even
             | if you have set price it is usually negotiated before work
             | starts, so nothing different here. Also as mentioned, there
             | is significant traction on Croatian section, international
             | section will have more and more jobs as we are focusing on
             | growth now, so great time to build reputation as a
             | freelancer
        
             | g00gler wrote:
             | I'm interested in hearing about this too.
        
       | woile wrote:
       | This looks super nice!!
       | 
       | How's the process for setting a task to "completed"? Can that be
       | exploited? How does the Automated jury process work?
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | Here's a quote from a Forbes article: "With a review system
         | like that of CryptoTask, reviewers are token holders that stake
         | an amount equal to the task value that they are putting
         | themselves forward for as a potential reviewer. It means that
         | being a stakeholder, you already have a chance of being
         | selected. That chance is directly proportional to that
         | individual's stake, so this prevents sybil attacks.
         | 
         | If they do, however, get randomly selected to be a reviewer and
         | the task goes into dispute, they are required to cast a vote on
         | whether or not they think the task was actually completed. If a
         | reviewer votes against the consensus or does not vote at all,
         | they do not lose any certain percentage of their staked amount.
         | 
         | Some of the benefits of such a system include:
         | Selection happens in secret to prevent reviewers from
         | influencing the consensus through collusion.         A two-
         | stage voting process (secret commit and then reveal) means
         | reviewers can't wait to see how other reviewers voted and then
         | just go with the consensus.         Reviewers would generally
         | be professionals with a relatively large token stake and
         | therefore in a good position to escalate and vote on a
         | dispute."
         | 
         | This would sum up dispute system with incentive for reviewers
         | being 10% of the task value split among them.
        
           | theamk wrote:
           | Could you elaborate on this?
           | 
           | > If a reviewer votes against the consensus or does not vote
           | at all, they do not lose any certain percentage of their
           | staked amount.
           | 
           | Does that mean they don't lose anything? Or that they lose
           | some amount, but that amount is not a simple fraction of
           | staked amount?
        
           | VukT wrote:
           | As for the actual Forbes article I keep mentioning https://ww
           | w.forbes.com/sites/davidpetersson/2018/10/27/the-p...
        
       | Imnimo wrote:
       | I was expecting the whitepaper to explain how the technology
       | works, but it seems to just be a business plan with very little
       | detail on what the system actually does.
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | Thank you for the feedback! We'll be updating onsite content
         | ASAP.
         | 
         | Here's a post containing two medium posts and additional
         | explanation on backbone of the platform.
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26480748
        
           | plumeria wrote:
           | How does the automated jury work?
        
             | VukT wrote:
             | Here's a link to the reply I don't paste another wall of
             | text: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26480945
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | Here is an old whitepaper with technical explanations
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26484040
        
       | timdaub wrote:
       | Hey,
       | 
       | great job on the landing page, it looks good!
       | 
       | Two questions:
       | 
       | - How are you coping with expensive gas on main net right now?
       | 
       | - Do you have a document describing how your token works on a
       | technical level. Like a spec or so.
       | 
       | Thanks and good luck!
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | There are a couple of medium posts describing technical
         | background of the platform and token itself such as:
         | https://cryptotask.medium.com/cryptotask-combines-defr-and-d...
         | https://cryptotask.medium.com/technical-background-of-crypto...
         | 
         | We are running on AEternity blockchain
         | (https://aeternity.com/), making gas fees sufficiently low.
         | There have been 19.5k transactions
         | https://www.aeknow.org/contract/detail/ct_X3szYGp5irejPsowXp...
         | and we are alive :)
        
           | timdaub wrote:
           | On AEternity! Wow, I've participated in their ICO back then.
           | 
           | Thanks for the details, I'll take a look.
        
           | hanniabu wrote:
           | Ooof, didn't know you were running on AEternity. That in
           | itself would be a no for me. I would definitely love to
           | participate if there was a decision to move to ETH when
           | Optimism is released.
        
             | Rule35 wrote:
             | Why? The blockchain technologically, the UI difficulty of
             | another chain, or the currency?
        
               | hanniabu wrote:
               | Because of all innovation is happening on Ethereum, so
               | yes I don't want to deal with the UX difficulty of using
               | another chain. Also I wouldn't want to invest (both time
               | and $) into a project on a 2nd rate platform. Not to
               | mention it doesn't reflect well on the project to not
               | consider the network effect nor the planned L2 solutions
               | that are here to address scalability. I highly recommend
               | looking into Optimism. I'm not sure what the difference
               | of AE and ETH EVM is (forked?), but I know that if you
               | have a project in Solidity then you can launch on
               | Optimism with little to no changes (just use their
               | compiler).
        
               | vmception wrote:
               | who cares? they are just dropping junk storage onto
               | random blockchain enthusiast's computers for basically
               | free instead of AWS and are clearly paying their talent
               | with a token that trades on the Ethereum network via
               | Uniswap. Would you even notice?
               | 
               | You aren't a developer for them so you don't have to
               | worry about Erlang, their token doesn't need an Aeternity
               | wallet if it trades on Ethereum, and even if you do earn
               | their token on the Aeternity blockchain they could just
               | offer a bridge on their own website.
               | 
               | Let me know if I missed something, how is this your
               | problem?
        
               | T0Bi wrote:
               | Because on Ethereum, they could connect/be integrated
               | with other projects. As most dapps are on Ethereum and
               | the network effect is probably the most important factor
               | in crypto, this will continue to be the case.
               | 
               | Therefore it's highly unlikely that CryptoTask will ever
               | have integrations with existing or potential new Dapps.
               | 
               | This might not be relevant right now, but it certainly
               | will be in the future.
        
               | vmception wrote:
               | We are talking about a freelancer marketplace dumping
               | state data on random nodes and miners computers. What
               | could possibly be the integration here?
               | 
               | Their erc20 token on Ethereum can integrate with whatever
               | you want
               | 
               | I think people are conflating things
        
           | imaginationra wrote:
           | No Ethereum network- no go for me as well.
        
             | vmception wrote:
             | Their token trades on Uniswap so what difference does that
             | make for you? Who cares where they dump their junk data?
        
         | terhechte wrote:
         | Not the author, but it should be possible for them to move to a
         | Layer 2 solution soon. Examples are Optimism, Fuel, or
         | Loopring. They're all still in beta though (I think)
        
       | anonymouszx wrote:
       | Hi. This looks interesting. Have you considered integrating with
       | Kleros for dispute resolution? And if not, why not?
        
         | slonso wrote:
         | Kleros has some complexities that we dont need, while we need
         | some things that Kleros doesnt have, ie potential reviewers are
         | not necessarily just token holders, but other users with
         | reputation above certain level etc.
        
       | dgellow wrote:
       | How does that work from a tax point of view? I guess you have to
       | pay income tax when you receive the tokens for the job, then
       | capital gain tax when you convert to USD/EUR?
        
         | Rule35 wrote:
         | For this sort of contractual work they'll probably bill and pay
         | in an algorithmic stablecoin which is intended to track the
         | dollar.
         | 
         | Regardless of the taxable nature of such a thing (which may or
         | may not be a security because it's designed _not_ to change
         | value based on the actions of others) it should simplify the
         | issue by at least not changing wildly from day to day.
        
           | dgellow wrote:
           | A stablecoin isn't different from other crypto assets from a
           | tax point of view (at least in the US and Germany).
        
             | Rule35 wrote:
             | I don't think any of it has really been tested, but because
             | two of the Howey test's four provisions are "with an
             | expectation of profit" and "on the work of others" and
             | don't seem to fit something intended to not create a profit
             | it seems like there will be a significant difference in
             | eventual treatment.
        
               | rmah wrote:
               | Whether the crypto you receive in compensation is
               | considered a security or not will not matter from an
               | income tax perspective in the US. If you were paid in
               | stock, you would owe taxes on the compensation at the
               | price of the stock at the time you received it. You might
               | also be subject to capital gains tax if you sell the
               | asset (stock or security-crypto) if you sell it with a
               | cost basis calculated at the time you received it.
               | 
               | IOW, if you got paid say 10 ETH, priced at $1800/ETH, you
               | would owe income tax for $18,000 that year. It does not
               | matter if you sell the ETH or not. It does not matter if
               | ETH is considered a security or not. You pay taxes on the
               | value of compensation whether the compensation is in USD,
               | stock, ETH or chickens. If you subsequently sold the ETH
               | for $2000/ETH, you would then owe capital gains taxes on
               | 10 * (2000 - 1800) = $2000 of capital gains. Possibly
               | short term, possibly long term depending on when you sell
               | it.
        
               | verdverm wrote:
               | The IRS has a nice FAQ here
               | https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-
               | taxpayers/freq...
               | 
               | Your analysis should be correct based on my understanding
               | of the tax treatments
        
       | nomy99 wrote:
       | i signed up now I'm expecting moneys
        
       | yowlingcat wrote:
       | How do you handle fraud, feedback and dispute resolution?
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | At the moment - tasks are manually approved. This is bound to
         | change as escrow system gets developed. You can find
         | development roadmap found about.cryptotask.org Feedback is
         | added with after a task is successfully completed, which over
         | time would create high quality freelancers from ones who don't
         | perform so well.
         | 
         | As for the dispute system - I'll copy previously provided
         | answer taken from Forbes article: "With a review system like
         | that of CryptoTask, reviewers are token holders that stake an
         | amount equal to the task value that they are putting themselves
         | forward for as a potential reviewer. It means that being a
         | stakeholder, you already have a chance of being selected. That
         | chance is directly proportional to that individual's stake, so
         | this prevents sybil attacks.
         | 
         | If they do, however, get randomly selected to be a reviewer and
         | the task goes into dispute, they are required to cast a vote on
         | whether or not they think the task was actually completed. If a
         | reviewer votes against the consensus or does not vote at all,
         | they do not lose any certain percentage of their staked amount.
         | 
         | Some of the benefits of such a system include:
         | Selection happens in secret to prevent reviewers from
         | influencing the consensus through collusion.         A two-
         | stage voting process (secret commit and then reveal) means
         | reviewers can't wait to see how other reviewers voted and then
         | just go with the consensus.         Reviewers would generally
         | be professionals with a relatively large token stake and
         | therefore in a good position to escalate and vote on a
         | dispute."
         | 
         | This would sum up dispute system with incentive for reviewers
         | being 10% of the task value split among them.
        
           | yowlingcat wrote:
           | Very cool. Although there's still challenge on the human side
           | on /seeding/ the right high quality initial network, I can
           | see something like this really being able to scale. The
           | question of course is how well this conceptually scales with
           | task complexity -- obviously, something like an Amazon MTurk
           | task is one thing and probably the appropriate existing
           | system for a system like this to supplant.
           | 
           | With that said, how does this scale to handling more complex
           | tasks that require more back and forth? There's the "fuzzy"
           | area of problem solving as tasks get larger and less clearly
           | defined. Is that out of scope for now to keep focus is on the
           | low hanging fruit?
           | 
           | I would love to see something like this completely deprecate
           | MTurk and low wage Upwork.
        
       | atlasunshrugged wrote:
       | This is pretty neat but can you help me understand the core
       | difference between this and Braintrust? How are you making this
       | easy/trustworthy for the demand side of the platform to use? My
       | learnings from a few years in the space (for context, I was early
       | at Gigster, then went to Germany to help build a freelance dev
       | platform for the EU market and now am at Tribe.AI where we
       | specialize in AI focused freelance work with a managed
       | marketplace) is that at the high end especially clients and
       | freelancers are willing to have huge premiums for middlemen that
       | alleviate headaches, take risk off their own plates, and can
       | better manage client relationships.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | slonso wrote:
         | There is a reputation system, so it is possible to see
         | freelancer's history of past jobs and ratings. Also escrow can
         | be used, so you wouldnt need to pay if job wasnt done according
         | to specs. Dispute resolution being smart contract based is more
         | transparent, and it is also great for ppl who prefer using
         | crypto payments
        
       | lxgr wrote:
       | > 0% fee
       | 
       | > Uniswap pair
       | 
       | With current gas prices, this unfortunately seems like a
       | contradiction.
        
         | hanniabu wrote:
         | Gas prices are a given so generally aren't listed as a fee
         | since it's intrinsic to the network.
        
           | georgyo wrote:
           | Can you imagine if your bank charged you to write a check?
           | 
           | I don't understand how people are okay with gas prices being
           | a given.
        
             | Rule35 wrote:
             | Because gas is like the cost of the paper. I wouldn't want
             | my bank selling a fancier cheque just to charge more, but I
             | do expect to cover the costs of the necessary anti-fraud
             | features, etc. Similar to the cost of the code to verify
             | the transaction.
             | 
             | But yes, it should be lower where possible. Both by code
             | optimization and blockchain/architecture choices.
        
               | remram wrote:
               | When my bank says they're sending me a new checkbook for
               | free, I definitely do not expect to pay the price of the
               | paper or anti-fraud features. Do you?
        
             | oarsinsync wrote:
             | > Can you imagine if your bank charged you to write a
             | check?
             | 
             | My bank charges me to use an ATM, and to send international
             | transfers, so it doesn't take a lot of imagination.
        
             | hanniabu wrote:
             | Network fees for blockchain are the equivalence of taxes.
             | People aren't okay with taxes, but they're the price you
             | need to pay to participate in the financial system.
        
         | VukT wrote:
         | Blockchain fees are always there. However, there are solutions
         | - such as NEAR (near.org) who reduce them. They claim to have
         | "10K x lower cost per transaction than Ethereum" Regular client
         | wouldn't feel those.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-03-16 23:01 UTC)