[HN Gopher] Hitachi to buy U.S. software developer GlobalLogic f... ___________________________________________________________________ Hitachi to buy U.S. software developer GlobalLogic for $9.6B Author : Element_ Score : 154 points Date : 2021-03-31 16:10 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.reuters.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.reuters.com) | i6ruce wrote: | Huh, an American company. The majority of the employees of which | are from eastern Europe or India. | tootie wrote: | There's a few of those EPAM is also US-based but has most of | it's workforce in Belarus and Ukraine. | madara7890 wrote: | Nice | brd wrote: | I'm not at all surprised to see this. The writing has been on the | wall that Hitachi has an appetite for getting into enterprise | software. 5-ish years ago they bought an SAP infrastructure shop | that I used to work with when I consulted in the space. At the | time it seemed they were dipping their toes but it felt like only | a matter of time until they made a bigger push into enterprise | software services. | mooreds wrote: | They also bought Pentaho, an ETL tool, in 2015: | https://www.hitachivantara.com/en-us/newsroom-hvtv/in-the-pr... | keypusher wrote: | They have actually been in this area for quite a while. My | first real dev job was at HDS after they acquired Archivas back | in 2007. We built off the Archivas foundation to deliver | petabyte-scale object storage for big enterprise/govt, kind of | like selling S3 in a box for companies to put in their | datacenter. HDS made the hardware and software. | | https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/archivas | simonw wrote: | Interesting section on their Wikipedia page: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GlobalLogic#OpenStreetMap_Foun... | | OpenStreetMap Foundation 2018 elections incident | | "The OpenStreetMap Membership Working Group released a public | report [25] alleging that this was an orchestrated, directed | campaign by GlobalLogic to register in mass their Indian | subsidiary employees, and suggested an attempt to manipulate the | election" | | The linked report has way more details: | https://openstreetmap.lu/MWGGlobalLogicReport20181226.pdf | macintux wrote: | Fascinating read, thanks. Curious about the two board | candidates who didn't wish to co-sign the letter recommending | an investigation. | petercooper wrote: | I love stories like this because it tends to result in a "Who??" | from all over the place and reminds us that, yes, you too can be | a multi-billion dollar company with very modest mindshare in the | broader industry. | missedthecue wrote: | Same goes for Hitachi... I thought they mainly dealt in heavy | industry like Caterpillar. They seem to be more of a Samsung. | AaronM wrote: | I worked for a Hitachi Factory building raid storage systems | in Oklahoma in a previous life. | guitarbill wrote: | Hitachi used to make chips, hard drive (HGST = Hitachi Global | Storage Technologies, now owned by WD), and still makes | optical drives, storage (Hitachi Data Systems, renamed a few | years ago to Hitachi Vantara). Defo run into Hitachi products | a few times; maybe I'm showing my age though | rjsw wrote: | Hitachi originally made their own design hard drives, I | have a 100MB ESDI one, more recently they bought IBM's disk | business before selling the lot to WD. | missedthecue wrote: | Yeah come to think of it, I've seen Hitachi hard drives as | well | [deleted] | ChrisArchitect wrote: | I was going to reply they're into tape storage also but | then realized that's _Fujifilm_ | pvarangot wrote: | Hitachi 7200rpm and 5400rpm drives were known to be very | realiable, by sometimes a factor of 2x in MTBF-like | metrics. | quickthrower2 wrote: | Hitachi were a popular stereo cassette and radio brand back | in the day not sure if that's still true. | nolok wrote: | As a rule of thumb Asian giants tend to deal in everything. | Especially true for Japanese giants (which is weird, since | for Japanese companies it's also common to find small giants | that deal in one thing only and never integrate). Especially | especially true for Korean giants. | Tarq0n wrote: | This is called a zaibatsu in Japan and a chaebol in South | Korea. The Korean ones in particular are simultaneously | fascinating and disturbing due to their interwovenness with | the state. | TMWNN wrote: | >This is called a zaibatsu in Japan and a chaebol in | South Korea. The Korean ones in particular are | simultaneously fascinating and disturbing due to their | interwovenness with the state. | | The zaibatsu were similarly interwoven with the Japanese | state through WW2, when the connections were cut during | the US occupation. While Sony, Toyota, Mitsubishi, et al. | are very large companies and have the corresponding | influence any such large company would have in any | developed country, there is no comparison with the | dominance of Samsung, Hyundai, and LG of the Korean | economy and politics. | kazen44 wrote: | is there no comparison though? atleast until the last | late 20th century, many european countries had companies | which where basically state sponsored enterprises in | certain regards. (Phillips, Volkswagen, Airbus etc). | NovemberWhiskey wrote: | No comparison. Take Mitsubishi. I'm not sure what most | people think of when they think of Mitsubishi (probably | econobox cars?). However, if you look at the entire scope | of the Mitsubishi Group, you get a different idea... | | Mitsubishi UFJ is Japan's largest bank and the world's | second largest bank holding company with ~$2tn of | deposits. | | Mitsubishi Corp is Japan's largest general trading | company, and includes active business lines covering | business services, consultancy, infrastructure (airports, | railways), asset management and finance, energy trading, | primary extraction of metals and minerals, heavy | machinery, defense contracts, ships, chemical | manufacturing and trading, as well as retail. | | Mitsubishi Heavy Industries separately manufacturers | airplanes, air-to-air missiles, helicopters, aerospace | turbine engines, main battle tanks, nuclear power plants, | gas turbines generators, LNG carrying ships, cruise | liners, space craft, wind turbines and desalination | equipment. | | MHI's subsidiaries also include Mitsubishi Chemical | (which is Japan's largest chemicals company), Nikon | Corporation (cameras, optics etc), and Mitsubishi Motors. | | This is _nothing_ like Philips /Airbus etc. | agumonkey wrote: | It's funny because even as obvious as it is .. it's easy to | forget. I mean a lot of people know Yamaha produces | motorbikes AND pianos AND hifi devices, yet it doesn't feel | like a giant. | | _memories of my beloved Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 21 " CRT_ | keiferski wrote: | These are called _keiretsu_ , formerly known as _zaibatsu_ | , popularized in the West via _Neuromancer._ | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keiretsu | DoingIsLearning wrote: | > Especially especially true for Korean giants. | | As supporting evidence... about 10 years ago I was staying | at a hostel in Seoul, I went to buy a bar of soap at a | convenience shop. I realized as I was getting ready to | shower that the soap itself was made by LG! | | Probably completely banal for Koreans but to me it was | equivalent to Tesla manufacturing basketball shoes, | completely left field. | DoofusOfDeath wrote: | Agreed. Hitachi makes a rather famous "muscle relaxer" | called the Magic Wand. | Ftuuky wrote: | From magic wands to self-propelled mortars, Hitachi | manufactures pretty much anything that has enough market | demand. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitachi#Products_and_servic | es | agumonkey wrote: | Can't wait for my Makita rugged SSD | heywire wrote: | You joke, but they have Makita branded UBB drives lol | wcfields wrote: | Love to play my Yamaha trombone on my Yamaha motorcycle | simlevesque wrote: | In the same vein, there's Shimano who is the biggest | brand in biking tech and one of the top five company for | fishing equipment. | telesilla wrote: | Well, spinning discs put to various uses? | 0_____0 wrote: | I thought I'd read something about them ceasing | production due to the odd brand association, but upon | further research it appears that they're still making it, | but without Hitachi markings, and distributing through a | company called Vibratex. | 91edec wrote: | Huh... really adds deeper meaning to the motto "If you | build it, they will come". | dillondoyle wrote: | Came to post this. Pun intended. But honestly it's good | for both uses can confirm. Though the new Theragun style | tools are a step up for sports therapy. | TomVDB wrote: | The Magic Wand is great to relieve the pain when the RSI | in my shoulder flares up! | drran wrote: | Replace your table with something ergonomic. | TomVDB wrote: | Ergonomic table with tray, Sculpt keyboard, trackball. | | It all does wonders, but it's not always enough. | flycaliguy wrote: | Plenty of people saying "who?" because they only know the sex | toy I suspect. | spaetzleesser wrote: | That's pretty common. There are a lot of super successful | companies that do good business without any mention in the | media. | | I think a lot of SV companies are very dependent on media | coverage to get their valuation up. Especially since they don't | have an idea how to make profits. | ibejoeb wrote: | Like when SUSE popped up a few weeks ago. It was a collective | "well huh..." | dna_polymerase wrote: | The Silicon Valley rockstars you are talking about are | usually customer facing, therefore media coverage is of | interest for a broader mass. GlobalLogic provides services to | companies, which makes them less commonly known. Meanwhile | Hitachi is known in a certain niche at best... | fireattack wrote: | I honestly think Hitachi is well-known even for average | people (not for IT division though). Not Sony level for | sure, but isn't exactly niche. | | But maybe it's just my bias too. | TeMPOraL wrote: | > _not for IT division though_ | | The only reason I know that company name is because I | think they sold hard drives in the past, and/or showed up | on my BIOS screen. So maybe IT people know it too. | okl wrote: | I think so, their name is on a lot of construction | equipment. | pySSK wrote: | They also have the Hitachi Magic Wand vibrator, which is | commonly known as just Hitachi. | | The brand was also known for power tools but that's not a | part of the company anymore and is being rebranded to | Metabo. | bilg21 wrote: | They used to make good TV's in the 90s too. First color | TV in our house was Hitachi. | koreanguy wrote: | Japanese take from the European patent office and | American patents. 90% of products coming out of Japan the | core of the product has origins in the houses of the | western patent houses. | MangoCoffee wrote: | yup. i didn't even know Hitachi is in IT. | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitachi) | | so many Global IT houses like IBM, Avanade...etc. is IT | outsource/consulting pie so large to feed all these companies? | dcolkitt wrote: | I would honestly love to read a write up from somebody closer | to the source, _what the hell do all these companies do?_ | | I've been in tech and tech-adjacent companies for over a | decade. And not once have I or anyone around me ever thought | "we really need some IBM/Hitachi/Avanade products now". | | What value proposition do firms like this actually fill? I'm | genuinely curious. | namdnay wrote: | They're outsourcing firms | ab_testing wrote: | I have worked in this space for a long time . | | Most of these companies implement COTS software . So if you | want to implement Oracle, SAP, Salesforce, Service Now , | JIRA or other such enterprise software , you will invite | bids from these consulting companies for implementation, | support and SLA . | sethhochberg wrote: | Tech or tech-adjacent firms tend to be defined that way, at | least in part, because they do the things these major | software consultancies and outsourcing firms do on their | own. | | If you're not a tech or tech-adjacent firm, and have a | nontrivial technology need, you're likely to pick up the | phone and call someone who specializes in delivering those | solutions. | | Think of it like the difference between Instacart having | their own software teams and infrastructure to manage | shoppers and orders, vs the national grocery chain | Instacart operates within calling IBM for an integrated | inventory management and point-of-sale system. | | There are debates to be had about whether this approach | yields good results over the long term (specifically for | the inventory management example, you could point to Amazon | and to a lesser extent Walmart having such success in part | because of their internal software efforts). But if you | aren't prepared to reinvent your grocery stores as a | friendly frontend for your logistics technology, plenty of | firms have solutions to sell you. | keypusher wrote: | The short answer is that they deliver solutions and | support. What they sell, primarily, is the ability for | someone at your company to call them and say "we have | problem X" and they will respond "no problem, we can solve | problem X for you", and they will take care of the rest. | This usually costs millions of dollars. | | Let's say you are a large Fortune 500 company. A bank | perhaps, a large retailer or an oil company. Your net worth | rivals Amazon. You do not use AWS or GCP, you host your own | data centers, and you have for decades. Now let's say you | need another few petabytes of storage with global | replication, durability, availability, you need hardware | delivered, fibre cables routed, software to tie it all | together and someone to call when you run into problems or | someone on your backend application team can't figure it | out. Or maybe you need Oracle and SAP integrated with | Active Directory for your 100,000 employees. | | Well, these companies will make that happen. Or many other | problems you might have, such as building custom | applications, implementing tooling, designing systems, | whatever. It's kind of like asking "who employs all these | personal chefs?! I've been eating for years and I've never | needed a personal chef. I just go to the store, buy some | groceries, and make food from the recipes I find online!" | The thing is that some people just don't want to deal with | all that, and they have enough money to make it someone | else's problem who has done it before. | hunterloftis wrote: | I spent five years in this space (in a small consultancy | that was acquired by GlobalLogic last year). I think this | is how one of our salespeople might describe the process. | | The reality tends to be somewhat messier. I especially | disagree with the "personal chef" analogy. A personal | chef is an expensive, dedicated, long-term employee - | much closer to a full time SWE than to a consultancy. | It's more like hiring a catering company for a wedding. | tomkat0789 wrote: | Some nice responses to this, but I'd be interested in | hearing about the trade off between a big company spinning | its own IT department vs hiring an IBM et al. | | Attached to articles about ERP and government contracts | failing and going over budget I often see comments like, | this isn't rocket science I could code something for them. | Obviously not the right fit for everybody, but is it right | for some? | keypusher wrote: | Hitachi Data Systems has been in IT since 1989, and their | history in the market goes back in to 60's or 70's. Now | rebranded Hitachi Vantara, most of their revenue was | competition was in the same space as EMC (now owned by Dell) | for enterprise data storage. They are a wholly owned | subsidiary of Hitachi, which you can think of like GE or | something, they are in everything. The market for enterprise | software and hardware is massive and often completely under | the radar for an audience like HN. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitachi_Data_Systems | kazen44 wrote: | > and often completely under the radar for an audience like | HN. | | what else do you think manages the massive amount of | spinning rust that contains your S3 data? Usually it is | storage systems like this. | qaq wrote: | It's outsourcing company there is a decent number of them. Many | from small Eastern European countries like EPAM Systems from | Belarus (Stock: EPAM) Mkt Cap 22.55B. They tend to have HQs in | US fo obvious reasons though. Surprised there is not much | invest in this space as you can grow one pretty rapidly to a | fairly large size. | 55555 wrote: | Wow, impressive. Probably not much interest because they | trade at a low multiple, but that's quite the company. In my | experience the quality of the experience you get when working | with a software consultancy/dev shop is inversely correlated | to the size of the firm. But I guess it works for others. | azinman2 wrote: | They probably have enough processes in place and enough | longevity to be able to get government contracts, big corp | contracts, etc. | dopidopHN wrote: | I work with them on a regular basis. You are correct, | talented folks. But they get the short end of the stick | when it come to who does what. Moral is not super high. | tstrimple wrote: | I've seen the same pattern as well. Growing dev teams | quickly without quality drops is difficult. At some point, | if you're successful enough in that space, your need to | bring in more bodies outpaces your ability to ensure you've | got good staff and processes. | varjag wrote: | EPAM is there for soon three decades, I dunno about | "quickly". | qaq wrote: | It's way lower risk and if you can grow 50M into billions | thats pretty much Unicorn level returns | jan_Inkepa wrote: | I like that they chose the name "Effective Programming for | America". | AlotOfReading wrote: | Isn't EPAM a consulting company? I didn't think they designed | their own products to outsource. | Yizahi wrote: | This distinction (and naming) is really not strict today, | especially when total corp headcount exceeds a few | thousands. One project may be pure software consultancy, | another may be a a complex solution, yet another can be a | hardware project inside the big corp (so if it was a | separate entity it would be called a product company or | startup). People can be outsourced or outstaffed or | anything in between. | | Basically in a case of 10k outsourcing corp it is pointless | to think about it as a single entity, it's a collection of | projects each managed differently, with different expertise | and different share of in-house development, from original | products to dumb legacy support. | ridethebike wrote: | Disclaimer: former EPAM employee (early 2010-s). | | Such big* consulting/outsourcing companies in Eastern | Europe(epam, globallogic and the like) have competent | engineers. | | I can see it especially clearly after moving to the US and | having to interview engineers from other big consultancies. | | *big - everything with several k employees is considered big | in Eastern Europe. | stephenhuey wrote: | My last full-time job in a corporation involved managing | many EPAM developers and after working with offshore | developers on multiple continents I can tell you they were | the strongest technically that I had encountered. I had | never heard of EPAM until my boss told me we were bringing | them on board to help us scale our app dev efforts! We had | IT consultants from a Big 4 firm who felt more like the | model of hire undergrads and teach them a few technical | things to throw jargon around in front of the client. I | realize in both cases it can be luck of the draw but I feel | like firms such as EPAM are focused on bringing serious | technical skills and experience to the table rather than a | general consultant demeanor. | jmchuster wrote: | Big shops will be sending their cheapest (aka youngest) | consultants to all their small clients, or at least until | they complain enough about the quality of work that they | send someone more senior along to right things. That's | what allows other smaller consultancy shops to compete, | because such clients would be considered our "big" | clients that we send our best people to. You're just | waiting for that moment where they get fed up with a big | shop and open it up for a new contract, and you can swoop | in and pick up a new client. | wil421 wrote: | The Big 4 consultancies hire college grads give them basic | training on the big cloud platforms and then fill up | projects. Otherwise they hire cheap engineers from Eastern | Europe or India. | | They are not looking for experienced engineers. At least in | the Technology Advisory space. | raincom wrote: | That's how these offshoring consulting companies make | money: for every 7 fresh undergrads, there is one senior | person. They pay $3500 per annum for these cheaper | resources; the senior resource gets paid about $16000 per | annum. Profits for these consulting companies come from | these $300 per month resources. | MangoCoffee wrote: | >The Big 4 consultancies hire college grads give them | basic training on the big cloud platforms and then fill | up projects. | | that's correct. i went thur that with Avanade. they teach | us some basic about the security system that they | implemented for their client and client ask for tech | support and guess who they send. | reader_mode wrote: | > Surprised there is not much invest in this space | | There is - huge spike in demand for talent locally in the | last 5-10 years as this business model started becoming | popular. Also seeing smaller agencies being acquired by | larger ones in some decently sized acquisitions recently. | | Initially the local IT sector was undeveloped, there were | quite a few good engineers working in really poor condition, | the only decent option was relocating to Western Europe. | | So there were experienced developers available for cheap, | and, compared to India, Central/Eastern Europe is closer to | US (some overlap in work hours), usually a much nicer | destination to travel to for offshore offices (depending on | the country, Croatia for example is a really nice tourist | destination, good English level and the culture should be | more familiar). | | So initially that higher quality talent got absorbed at below | market rates (especially for US standards) and there were | quite a few success stories and reputation builders. But now | as this model expands competition is driving up the price | locally as well - there just isn't enough people to outsource | - they are starting to scrape bottom of the barrel talent, | asses-in-seats, straight out of college Indian code farm | model with all the problems that had. Also portals like | toptal made it easier to skip these agencies and work | directly for clients so now the agencies have to compete with | that for talent. | | I think the peak for this agency model is behind us and I | think the quality has started to drop (there were a few | smaller agencies that built their reputation like I described | above and had great success, they used availability of local | talent to built respectable teams and getting hired there was | a resume highlight, sort of like getting hired at FAANG on a | local level. Nowadays they are hiring people they would | screen out after an initial call and it's selling asses in | seats, cashing in on built reputation) | redisman wrote: | Same reason that WeWork was magically worth 100x equivalent | real estate companies because Adam Neumann was so cool and | quirky. | diogenescynic wrote: | "Software developer" is being used very generously here. | GlobalLogic from what I understood was more of an Infosys or | outsourcing company. | ullevaal wrote: | What distinction are you making? I take your comment as | pointing at the fact they they are not owners of the software | when it's done, but developing software for others still makes | one a software developer, or no? | iujjkfjdkkdkf wrote: | A lot of the "system integration" work that these big | consultancies get hired for is more like configuration (of | big erp systems like SAP and Oracle or whatever)? There may | be some overlap but as I understand it's very different from | what many people would think of when they hear software | development. | | Edit: I think this causes internal confusion as well, like | consultancies hear "software project" and assume their team | can do it because they have "software" experience, and then | you end up with these disasters like you hear about from | Accenture and Deloitte where they spend 10's of millions of | dollars building a website that doesn't work. The parallel | language in a academic, SV type tech, and tech consulting is | actually a source of a lot of confusion. | paxys wrote: | The thing with these consulting companies is they will | never say no (including for stuff that they are wildly | unprepared to do). You can hire them for installing | software on employees' computers, deploying and managing | some SaaS product, building a healthcare signup website for | an entire state, building an internal portal, running a | tech conference, even planning a company picnic (not | kidding). So trying to define what area they operate in and | what exact role their employees play is impossible. | [deleted] | mk89 wrote: | FYI, GlobalLogic is not bad at all. | | I have worked with both GlobalLogic and InfoSys developers. In | my experience, they can't be compared: for me globallogic wins. | However,... they are both freaking huge companies, so you never | know what you get. | Taylor_OD wrote: | The lines between a consulting company and outsourcing company | don't really exist anymore. Especially at this size. | oliv__ wrote: | _> San Jose-based GlobalLogic is currently owned 45% each by | Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and Swiss investment firm | Partners Group_ | | Man, what? What a weird set of owners | MattGaiser wrote: | Canada Pension Plan is the equivalent of Social Security in the | USA, except that it invests. | | They own all sorts of stuff all over the world. Bridges. | Airports. Hotels. | whalesalad wrote: | Norway does something similar afaik and are sitting on a | pretty wicked pile of cash. | bidirectional wrote: | Why is it weird? | vco3340 wrote: | Extremely common for mature companies to be backed by private | equity and pension funds | pottertheotter wrote: | They are actually pretty normal, but I guess not well known | outside of the investment world. These are two of the largest | groups making private equity investments. | | Partners Group is a very large investment management firm with | $109bn assets under management (AUM), of which 48% is in | private equity. It is pretty common for pension plans to invest | in private equity firms, but the larger ones also make direct | investments, usually alongside a large PE firm such as Partners | Group. | | CPP Investments, the entity that manages all of the assets of | the Canada Pension Plan, has US$378bn AUM. ~25% of that, $90bn, | is in private equity. Some of their direct investments, which | you can see on their website[1], are Blackhawk Networks, Jimmy | John's, Neiman Marcus, Petco, Qlik, SUSE, and Waymo. They also | have investments in VC firms, such as A16Z, Sequoia Capital, | and even Y Combinator. | | [1] https://www.cppinvestments.com/the-fund/our- | investments/inve... | sdwvit wrote: | Used to work for GL, they treat employees well. | spaetzleesser wrote: | This could just be a product of the specific people I have dealt | with but I have had the (dis)pleasure of dealing with quite a few | outsourcing companies and GlobalLogic so far has been the only | one where I felt the relationship is productive and we are | getting good people. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-03-31 23:00 UTC)