[HN Gopher] Clothing, How Did They Make It? Part IVa: Dyed in th... ___________________________________________________________________ Clothing, How Did They Make It? Part IVa: Dyed in the Wool Author : CapitalistCartr Score : 130 points Date : 2021-04-04 15:27 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (acoup.blog) (TXT) w3m dump (acoup.blog) | fab1an wrote: | Great to see stuff like this on HN. | | Curious: there is an unbelievably huge wealth of this type of | "content" that lives almost exclusively in history books, or at | least seems profoundly difficult to find on the internet. | | Then there's the insane illusion that virtually all knowledge is | accessible within the first Google search result page, so I'm | always pleased whenever articles like this one find their way to | the surface... | | Incidentally, if anyone is interested in the _general_ topic of | making cloths / tailoring, I just recorded a podcast episode on | this - the show is about deep, obsessive hobbies and the first | episode is about a neuroscientist who transforms into a tailor at | night: https://www.whentheworkisdone.com/ | MaysonL wrote: | Ah, deep obsessive hobbies. My mother once made a couple of | suits for herself and my sister-in-law, starting from an almost | raw fleece (she refused to do the cleaning of the fleece to get | rid of the twigs and other crap). Also, for clothes | construction and fabric arts, see my sister-in-laws blog, which | made the front page of HN a few months ago. [0][1] She makes | clothes, and teaches the art and craft of it. | | 0: https://weaversew.com/wordblog/2020/11/07/thats-not-why-i- | di... 1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25195659 | BlueTemplar wrote: | Speaking of books, and Google: | | https://www.wired.com/2017/04/how-google-book-search-got-los... | | (Also, funny how these days I am getting better results | searching HN directly...) | philipkglass wrote: | There are a lot of books covering historical subjects on the | web. Their contents usually won't show up in a general web | search though. I have learned a lot about the past from old | books. Google Books, the HathiTrust, and archive.org are useful | here. Newer books are often available on Library Genesis. | | As an example: have you ever wondered about the state of | toxicology in the late Victorian era? What poisons were known, | what poisons were detectable (and how), and other nuts-and- | bolts details of a certain kind of murder mystery? This | information is hard to find in modern web pages -- particularly | if you don't know enough to tell who is a trustworthy guide to | the past. | | But a HathiTrust search does the job easily. | | Use the "advanced full text search" form. Search for the word | poisons. Restrict results to English language documents in the | years 1880-1900. You'll get a wealth of books back, like this | illustrated 1885 text: | | "Micro-chemistry of poisons : including their physiological, | pathological, and legal relations; with an appendix on the | detection and microscopic determination of blood: adapted to | the use of the medical jurist, physician, and general chemist" | | https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nnc2.ark:/13960/t9d51... | | Or from 1883: | | "Indian snake poisons, their nature and effects." | | https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=coo.31924003195769&vi... | | 1899: | | "Practical materia medica for nurses, with an appendix | containing poisons and their antidotes" | | https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=loc.ark:/13960/t0pr8z... | sillyquiet wrote: | The depiction of medieval folks wearing drab and dirty and torn | clothes in black, browns, and and grays is THE biggest peeve I | have with costume design in 'historical' movies and tv shows. The | absolute worst offenders in recent memory being Vikings and The | Last Kingdom, but there are a plethora of others. Not to mention | the biker-gear-leather-fetish as armor look they all seem to go | for. | thaumasiotes wrote: | https://www.tor.com/2014/03/25/how-history-can-be-used-in-fi... | | > Even costuming accuracy can be a communications problem, | since modern viewers have certain associations that are hard to | unlearn. Want to costume a princess to feel sweet and feminine? | The modern eye demands pink or light blue, though the historian | knows pale colors coded poverty. Want to costume a woman to | communicate the fact that she's a sexy seductress? The audience | needs the bodice and sleeves to expose the bits of her [that] | modern audiences associate with sexy, regardless of which bits | would plausibly have been exposed at the time. | | > I recently had to costume some Vikings, and was lent a pair | of extremely nice period Viking pants which had bold white and | orange stripes about two inches wide. I know enough to realize | how perfect they were, and that both the expense of the dye and | the purity of the white would mark them as the pants of an | important man, but that if someone walked on stage in them the | whole audience would think: "Why is that Viking wearing clown | pants?" | watwut wrote: | > Want to costume a princess to feel sweet and feminine? | | You are already starting with "I want the princess to be | cartoon character rather then human character". | | Also, presumably, there would not been a single viking with | bright pants, but rather all characters having colors. So one | wiking would stand out less. | dwohnitmok wrote: | In the vein of historical accuracy, that article repeats the | assertion that nobles basically randomly pooped all over the | floor in Versailles. Does anybody know if that's actually | true? I feel like I've heard so many conflicting versions of | this tale (yes there were essentially small mountains of shit | and nobody batted an eye, no these were basically lies and | gossip and fabricated by enemies at the time and framed in | such a way that it is clear by their salacious tone this was | _not_ normal and very disapproved of, etc.) that I have no | idea what to believe. | inglor_cz wrote: | IIRC it was pretty normal there to throw the content of the | chamberpots out of the window in the morning. Which led to | a great stink in the summer. | thaumasiotes wrote: | I tried to look into that claim a little more and found a | website claiming there was a single French princess who | behaved this way on the theory that she was too important | to have to waste her time visiting bathrooms, and that her | unusual behavior outraged the palace servants (who had to | clean it up - the princess wasn't exactly wrong about being | important). | | This seems more plausible than the presentation here. | DanBC wrote: | Or it works the other way. Modern audiences don't understand | the significance of a wool cap in Shakespeare. | | https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/cZHd4yrC7DV2sdyndn. | .. | thaumasiotes wrote: | > If, for instance, a theatre director today put a middle- | aged man on stage wearing low-slung jeans, everybody in the | audience would know it was both inappropriate and funny. | | Well, that claim didn't age well. It's hard to get non-low- | rise pants in any variety now. | sillyquiet wrote: | Yes, this makes sense, but you can convey what you want to an | audience without compromising historicity so thoroughly I | believe. | | Taking the Vikings tv show example - Ragnar Lothbroke would | have been in richly and boldly colorful, probably | embroidered, clothing of wool and linen and maybe even silk | or cotton from trade. | | He would have been covered in gold and silver jewelry, and | his armor and weapons would have been gilt or inlaid with | silver, gold, and copper-alloy and intricately engraved. | | Instead we get an extra from Sons of Anarchy complete with | tats and edgy haircut. | | Edit, also 3/4s of those impressions the modern audience does | have is from decades of movies and tv shows. I think a | project that respects its audience could do its part to start | projecting more accurate impressions of past aesthetics and | fashion sensibilities. | elseweather wrote: | IF you enjoy this kind of thing, (and you aren't already an | acoup fan), he wrote an entire article about the biker-gear- | leather-fetish trope in Game of Thrones: | https://acoup.blog/2020/12/04/collections-that-dothraki-hord... | sillyquiet wrote: | Ah great read! A tad condescending in tone but I imagine they | _do_ have to deal with outraged fans a lot. | C4stor wrote: | The blog is called "a collection of unlimited pedantry", so | at least some pedantry is to be expected ! | jabl wrote: | > The blog is called "a collection of unlimited | pedantry", so at least some pedantry is to be expected ! | | While we're on the topic of pedantry, the blog is called | "A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry", not "unlimited". | Pfft! | BlueTemplar wrote: | Speaking of Vikings, he covered the latest Assassin's Creed too | : | | https://acoup.blog/2020/11/20/miscellanea-my-thoughts-on-ass... | jonplackett wrote: | It's easy to forget, or just not realise, how insanely far we | have come as a species, and all the shoulders we're standing on. | | It makes me very, very grateful for where we are now, but also | feel really, really spoilt. | aemerson_ wrote: | Reading this actually makes me think the opposite: That we | basically do the exact same processes but with the production | obfuscated away and at a larger scale. | | When you peel back the layers of garment manufacture today it's | basically the same processes and materials as this series lays | out. | ordu wrote: | I believe, that you both think the very same idea just using | different words. | jonplackett wrote: | What I basically mean is, I'm really glad I don't have to | spend my time and effort making clothes from scratch or | smelting iron, or farming wheat. Or any of the many tasks | that led up to making that even possible. | | I'm really glad someone else has figured out how to do the | many, many extremely time consuming steps (like domesticating | sheep and wheat and flax) so that we can now enjoy those | benefits. | | But I also then feel like, shit, I really ought to be doing | something for the world. They literally worked ALL this out | for me. I barely have anything I need to do to survive and | live an easy life, compared to back then at least. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-04-04 23:00 UTC)