[HN Gopher] SCO Linux FUD returns from the dead
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       SCO Linux FUD returns from the dead
        
       Author : marcodiego
       Score  : 59 points
       Date   : 2021-04-04 20:27 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.zdnet.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.zdnet.com)
        
       | fartcannon wrote:
       | Microsofts underhanded behavior with the SCO Linux case is one of
       | the primary reasons to distrust them.
        
         | marcodiego wrote:
         | We should not forgive the 'new' microsoft because their recent
         | stance regarding floss. Their bad behavior in that era has
         | echoes to this day:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO%E2%80%93Linux_disputes#Mic...
        
       | marcodiego wrote:
       | Wikipedia page is informative:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO%E2%80%93Linux_disputes it
       | specifically mentions the two related suicides. It very sad that
       | the article will need new updates.
        
         | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
         | I don't see there that the suicides have anything to do with
         | the SCO Linux case in particular.
        
           | marcodiego wrote:
           | Maybe depression brought by the case.
        
       | McGlockenshire wrote:
       | Does this mean we get Groklaw back?
        
         | nix23 wrote:
         | If it goes really well a forced Open-sourced Openserver5/6 and
         | Unixware 7.... :)
        
         | arbitrage wrote:
         | Groklaw wasn't the same after PJ left. She moved on to bigger
         | and better projects, I believe.
        
           | throwaway2048 wrote:
           | She disappeared off the internet after the NSA revelations
           | came out.
        
             | Ygg2 wrote:
             | What revelations?
        
               | edoceo wrote:
               | Here is a start
               | 
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6243081
        
             | [deleted]
        
       | tyingq wrote:
       | I'm not sure how long the sad shell that is now Xinuos can last.
       | I poked around their website, and it's like a ghost town with
       | empty employment pages, partner list pages that require a login,
       | and the last news item prior to this lawsuit is "Xinuos Releases
       | 2019 Year in Review".
        
         | marcodiego wrote:
         | Some companies have the possibility to survive because of
         | clients which are dependent on their solutions. The OpenServer
         | case includes big names like fujitsu, mcdonalds and kwait
         | petroleum:
         | https://web.archive.org/web/20040207073246/http://www.sco.co...
        
           | tyingq wrote:
           | I'm sure it's possible they are still using it, but that's
           | just saying McDonald's used it in 2004.
           | 
           | For example, even this current page
           | http://www.sco.com/5reasons/ has a claim that McDonald's is
           | using it. But the quote is from John Doty, who last worked at
           | McDonalds in 2001.
           | 
           | Edit: Googling around a bit, it seems like they switched to
           | something called "New-POS", which runs on Windows. It was
           | originally from a company called Savista, later re-named
           | Torex. The software was purchased outright with source code
           | and is now maintained in-house, and called "NP6". So it seems
           | unlikely McDonald's has any real amount of SCO left.
           | Apparently McDonald's was their largest client, so that's
           | notable.
        
       | axiolite wrote:
       | The original SCO case dragged on because the law firm screwed-up
       | and foolishly offered their services for free, indefinitely. This
       | time around, I can't imagine Xinuos will stumble upon such an
       | amazing deal and instead will have to bleed money to fund an
       | obviously hopeless lawsuit.
        
       | benjamir wrote:
       | Really, I thought the original source's posting on April 1st +
       | "Xinuos" (Unix backwards + OS) is an obvious joke!?
        
         | bonzini wrote:
         | The fact that it's almost everyone's reaction says a lot about
         | the substance behind the lawsuit.
        
         | alfiedotwtf wrote:
         | Xinu is actually an old Unix clone from the 80s... there's also
         | an OS book detailing it too (it's a good read)
        
         | marcodiego wrote:
         | Unfortunately not a joke.
        
       | marcodiego wrote:
       | I think the best way out for SCO was if IBM bought them. But, if
       | IBM did so, other companies could try the same attack in other
       | opportunities. So, IBM took a route that could crush it to death,
       | but we are almost two decades after it all began and the zombie
       | has not been shot in the head. Hope the case effectively finishes
       | this time.
       | 
       | It is really a shame. Caldera looked like a good distro:
       | 
       | https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=sco
       | 
       | https://virtuallyfun.com/wordpress/2013/03/27/caldera-open-l...
        
         | zeruch wrote:
         | Caldera was a decent distro in its day. It had some potential
         | (it was funded initially by Ray Noorda's Canopy VC which gave
         | it a little leg up), but its fall off/acquisition by SCO was
         | fast, hard and ugly.
        
       | gerikson wrote:
       | This version of Easter kinda sucks.
        
       | cutler wrote:
       | The SCO case is a bit like Internet Explorer 6. Just when you
       | thought it was dead ....
        
       | ai_ja_nai wrote:
       | Isn't this an April's Fool?
        
         | marcodiego wrote:
         | No: https://www.xinuos.com/xinuos-sues-ibm-and-red-hat/
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-04 23:00 UTC)