[HN Gopher] FreeBSD 13.0
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       FreeBSD 13.0
        
       Author : 4ad
       Score  : 146 points
       Date   : 2021-04-13 18:54 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.freebsd.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.freebsd.org)
        
       | rwaksmunski wrote:
       | I applaud the removal of all the obsolete drivers and utilities.
       | Let's keep it lean and mean!
        
       | olavgg wrote:
       | This release includes ZFS 2.0, + draid.
       | 
       | I've already upgraded and is very happy with how things work.
        
       | dddddaviddddd wrote:
       | Release notes: https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Recent and related:
       | 
       |  _FreeBSD /arm64 becoming Tier 1 in FreeBSD 13_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26755476 - April 2021 (33
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _FreeBSD 13.0 Beta1 Now Available_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26051254 - Feb 2021 (110
       | comments)
        
       | wyager wrote:
       | Just got this up and running. No issues so far except wireguard
       | keepalive is broken for me for some reason. Very exciting to see
       | Linux and FreeBSD pulling ZFS from the same upstream - I needed
       | this to properly deal with encryption etc.
        
         | zx2c4 wrote:
         | Keepalive fixed in the wireguard-kmod released yesterday and
         | put into ports today:
         | 
         | https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2021-April/00661...
         | 
         | https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=2ef23d42cbce1ed168...
        
       | BlackLotus89 wrote:
       | Since Linux became unstable on one oft my Intel Laptops (only
       | this one system) (crashes, multi monitor problems,...) I wanted
       | to try FreeBSD in it (Linux compatibility, zfs, ...) but the
       | recent wireguard nearly merge and the following reaction [0] made
       | me pause in actually trying it.
       | 
       | I hope the developer and merge polcies aren't as headless as they
       | seem.
       | 
       | [0] https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/03/buffer-overruns-
       | lice...
        
       | chungy wrote:
       | FreeBSD is such an excellent operating system, I applaud all
       | developers and users that have kept it going all these years.
       | 
       | I've been toying around with it in a virtual machine since
       | 13.0-RC2, in many ways it can feel like a foreign system
       | (compared to my Linux background), but there are a lot of nice
       | things that also make it feel "greener" on the FreeBSD side. It's
       | honestly hard to understate the value of boot environments and
       | the boot loader's capability to swap between them or even roll
       | back to a spool checkpoint. It makes almost all upgrades and
       | system changes risk-free.
        
         | yrgulation wrote:
         | It has been 15 years since i last used freebsd in a commercial
         | setting. Linux since then. In many ways linux feels alien to
         | me. I still default to "pkg add" in my mind before "apt get". A
         | shame it didnt gain more traction, as i really loved this OS.
        
         | Arelius wrote:
         | Having come into Linux from FreeBSD, I agree, FreeBSD does feel
         | "greener"
        
           | mnd999 wrote:
           | As someone who's done the same (although I'm still using
           | FreeBSD on my NAS) I missed decent documentation the most. I
           | felt most at home on Arch because the wiki is pretty decent.
        
             | mvanbaak wrote:
             | The man pages on FreeBSD are a lot better than on Linux.
             | And you can read them without network and/or browser.
        
               | chungy wrote:
               | The Arch Wiki is alright if you run Arch, but I
               | definitely prefer well-written and fully up-to-date
               | manpages from the offset. For starters, it doesn't
               | require me to open a web browser first; it also doesn't
               | depend on me having network connectivity at any
               | particular time.
               | 
               | My take is definitely different from GP: I find FreeBSD
               | to have a much better documentation story compared to
               | Linux (even Arch).
        
         | E39M5S62 wrote:
         | Take a look at https://github.com/zbm-dev/zfsbootmenu/ . Full
         | boot environment support for Linux, along with the ability to
         | create a new environment from a snapshot in your bootloader,
         | live-diff snapshots to see _when_ something changed, and even
         | chroot into a boot environment to fix things.
        
         | throw4738 wrote:
         | Maybe have a look at OpenSuse, it has rollback as well and
         | feels like traditional Linux.
        
           | nix23 wrote:
           | Haha no not really, i have tumbleweed installed on my laptop
           | and love it BUT it's NOT traditional.
        
           | chungy wrote:
           | Last I knew, this requires OpenSUSE on btrfs. It's a pale
           | shadow in functionality compared to ZFS... not to mention
           | stability, too.
        
             | nix23 wrote:
             | True btrfs is BS, i have XFS with tumbleweed and pretty
             | happy (on the laptop), everything else freebsd all the
             | way..if i can.
        
       | hyakosm wrote:
       | Tier-1 support for ARMv8 is a great thing, I hope using it for
       | Raspberry Pi or similar single-board computer.
        
         | KozmoNau7 wrote:
         | I hope that ARM[1] can become a real challenger to the
         | x86-dominated server/desktop/laptop space, maybe even give us a
         | bit of that vibrant environment of multiple competing platforms
         | that existed in the 80s and 90s.
         | 
         | Perhaps it's just my nostalgia speaking, but I always found it
         | neat how there were x86 daughterboards for Macs and Amigas, and
         | various other similar setups. A full Ryzen APU-powered PC with
         | good graphics performance can easily fit on a PCIe card, which
         | could slot neatly into a hypothetical ARM-powered PC, with
         | access to the mainboard's resources.
         | 
         | Use the ARM main PC for desktop and other less intensive tasks,
         | and fire up the full-fat x86 daughterboard for gaming and
         | number-crunching.
         | 
         | Or maybe it would be a lot more elegant to just have good power
         | management on an already powerful ARM CPU and GPU and handle
         | what x86 stuff you need via emulation, but full-computer
         | daughterboards are just so _neat_!
         | 
         | [1] Or even better, RISC-V.
        
       | jbirer wrote:
       | My Thinkpad E15 Gen 2 with AMD Ryzen 4500U (Radeon Renoir
       | Graphics) hangs on boot when I enable the amdgpu driver and
       | disable syscon (framebuffer). Hardware support is one of the big
       | things that holds FreeBSD back.
        
         | netflixandkill wrote:
         | It's anything but the largest projects really. Even mainstream
         | linux support for a lot of laptops is still iffy. Too much work
         | for too few people and fewer willing to pay to make it happen.
         | 
         | It will be interesting to see if further ARM penetration into
         | what was historically Windows-or-Mac only portions of the
         | laptop market helps with that.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-13 23:00 UTC)