[HN Gopher] Why most non-fiction authors don't make any money
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Why most non-fiction authors don't make any money
        
       Author : rjyoungling
       Score  : 80 points
       Date   : 2021-04-16 10:00 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (writeusefulbooks.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (writeusefulbooks.com)
        
       | 07121941 wrote:
       | Fantastic advice. Now all I've got to do is write
        
       | crecker wrote:
       | Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26831469
        
       | ed25519FUUU wrote:
       | It seems to me that virtually everyone going into the creative
       | fields (art, music, writing, acting) should enter that field
       | without any expectation to make a living from it.
       | 
       | We pay other people to do things that aren't fun for us, not the
       | other way around.
        
         | apocalypstyx wrote:
         | The owners of and investors in publishing houses, movie
         | studios, and music labels tend to expect something beyond
         | 'making a living'. Whereas those who actually generate cultural
         | phenomena (our culture, aka the shared framework of references
         | that allows us to define an us) see little to nothing from work
         | that is foundational to multi-billion dollar media empires. Not
         | making a living means that the class of people most free to
         | engage in cultural creation are those who are independently
         | wealthy.
         | 
         | 'Follow your passion' brings with it the perversity of _if you
         | love it, then that should be reward enough_. Much in the way
         | that doctors and nurses have been labeled as  'heroes' is used
         | as a smoke screen to _not_ increase pay or alleviate working
         | conditions because _you love your work_ and _can you really be
         | a hero if you expect money from it?_
         | 
         | One way or another, it seems, human society appears bent on
         | perpetuating the idea that some people should generate value
         | for others without compensation in regards to that value.
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | I'm not sure why the downvotes. That's absolutely a fair
         | comment. There are some cases where creative work can benefit
         | your day job through visibility and related skills. (A talented
         | amateur actor is probably going to be better at presentations
         | for example. And being that really good presenter at your
         | company's user group event every year isn't going to hurt you.)
         | But it seems a good point overall. Being great on some
         | instrument probably isn't going to be a great argument for why
         | you should get promoted at a non-music-related position.)
        
           | m463 wrote:
           | I would also say, people make more money doing stuff that's
           | hard. (and of course the bar goes up)
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | I'd say "hard" is a necessary but not sufficient condition.
             | People (individually or in the aggregate) also need to be
             | willing to pay you specifically a lot of money for what you
             | specifically bring to the table that, in many creative
             | fields, requires being very top tier (and lucky).
             | 
             | In the arts, the equivalent of a mid-tier developer makes
             | jack squat.
        
           | Invictus0 wrote:
           | It's a bad comment because it totally misses the actual
           | dynamics of the creative marketplace--that is, superstars-
           | take-all. It has nothing to do with the "fun" of the work.
           | The superstars in the creative industries are making 7-8
           | figures and everyone else is making 4-5 figures while trying
           | to become a superstar.
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | And I would say that going into a field that requires
             | hitting the jackpot to not be waiting tables as a day job
             | isn't a great strategy from an expected earnings
             | perspective. (Which isn't to say people shouldn't do it if
             | that's their thing.)
        
         | WalterBright wrote:
         | Fortunately for me, writing compilers is fun.
        
           | ed25519FUUU wrote:
           | Doing something that's fun _and_ hard.
        
           | btcstudente wrote:
           | Must be fun!
        
       | currymj wrote:
       | how much are these numbers skewed by academic monographs? these
       | are books that are basically going to be sold only to university
       | libraries, which might explain why they sell <500 copies.
       | 
       | there are many such books where no author ever expects to make
       | money -- they have other incentives due to the way academia is
       | organized.
        
         | gxqoz wrote:
         | My impression is that even reasonably well-selling non-fiction
         | books typically do not sell a lot of copies. To make it onto a
         | best-seller list you only need to sell in the tens of thousands
         | of books.
        
       | krmmalik wrote:
       | I'm an author of a non-fiction book. I self-published. My book
       | has a 5-star rating to date even though it was published nearly 5
       | years ago. My book meets most of the criteria laid out in this
       | book. I even had both a publisher and distributor approach me and
       | I had plenty leverage. Despite all that, I didn't get the book
       | sales I wanted nor the PR.
       | 
       | Everyone that reads my book is surprised to hear it's not topping
       | the charts or plastered everywhere my audience hangs out. My book
       | beat out all the competition when it came out in terms of
       | reviews.
       | 
       | While the points in this post are valid, I don't believe they get
       | to the bottom of what holds back sales.
       | 
       | Frankly, I don't know what the answer is -- I have a vague idea
       | of what it could be but I haven't had a chance to try those
       | things. Perhaps if my book had been in all airport bookstores a
       | few years ago, it might have taken off (no pun intended) like Tim
       | Ferriss' book but who knows.
        
         | kjksf wrote:
         | Does it, though?
         | 
         | I assume you mean "Billion Dollar Muslim: Why We Need
         | Spiritually Inspired Entrepreneurs".
         | 
         | It clearly makes mistake #3: "writing broadly about the topic
         | instead of making a clear promise about what the reader will
         | get out of it".
         | 
         | What is "clear promise about what the reader will get out of
         | it" in "Billion Dollar Muslim"?
         | 
         | Frankly, based on the title I don't see why I should read it,
         | even if I'm somewhat interested in entrepreneurship.
         | 
         | "Why We Need Spiritually Inspired Entrepreneurs" never occurred
         | to me as a question worth answering. Not the way "how to
         | increase sales?" is a question I might be interested in knowing
         | the answer to.
         | 
         | BTW: you website has expired SSL certificate so the main source
         | of promoting your book is as good as gone.
        
           | krmmalik wrote:
           | I gave up marketing the book two years ago after trying for
           | nearly 3 years. SSL certificate I will check out. That must
           | be recent as the site has been running fine for years.
           | 
           | You might have a point about the promise of the book, but
           | that depends on whether your muslim or not. Most muslims who
           | come across it, understand the premise immediately, but
           | still, you might have a point there.
        
           | yesenadam wrote:
           | > What is "clear promise about what the reader will get out
           | of it" in "Billion Dollar Muslim"?
           | 
           | Uh, it promises to explain Why We Need Spiritually Inspired
           | Entrepreneurs.
           | 
           | I don't think the book needs to appeal to _you_ to count as a
           | clear promise the reader will get something out of it! You
           | could object in the same way to a book called  "How to Draw
           | in Charcoal", how "Frankly, based on the title I don't see
           | why I should read it".
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | UperSpaceGuru wrote:
         | I just bought your book based on the post above. Maybe it's
         | marketing? Your book is also aimed a small niche(I'm on your
         | target market!), maybe that's it?
        
           | krmmalik wrote:
           | That's hilarious. Enjoy the book :)
           | 
           | Marketing requires a huge budget in the VC age since you're
           | competing with ever increasing ad prices. I have spent a lot
           | of money on advertising regardless.
           | 
           | One thing that has been a major sticking point for me
           | however, ist hat distribution has been a huge issue. I
           | wouldn't say my target market is that small. Most of the
           | Middle East and Asia is quite ripe for my book but amazon
           | doest operate it's self-publishing arm out there and the
           | alternatives have not been that enticing.
        
             | zrail wrote:
             | > Marketing requires a huge budget in the VC age since
             | you're competing with ever increasing ad prices.
             | 
             | This is a mental trap that is super easy to fall into. The
             | author of the article is writing a marketing guide.
             | Marketing encompasses the entire product and go to market
             | design, of which advertising is just a tiny part. Notice in
             | his table of contents that advertising is only mentioned in
             | one chapter very late in the book.
        
             | kjksf wrote:
             | > Marketing requires a huge budget in the VC ag
             | 
             | And yet the free source of marketing (your twitter account)
             | doesn't have a link to the book.
             | 
             | Neither does your HN bio.
             | 
             | Your website is broken (expired SSL certificate).
             | 
             | As far as I can tell you don't have a single page that
             | tries to sell the book. A link to amazon is a bare minimum.
             | 
             | https://writeusefulbooks.com/ is an example of a master
             | class of marketing a book. It describes what the book is
             | about and why one should buy it. It established the author
             | as successful writer and therefore authority on the
             | subject.
             | 
             | He also wrote an article good enough to hit HN and be a
             | driver to the website. That required 0 budget.
             | 
             | Maybe your failure at marketing are a result of you being
             | bad at it, not a universal truth that you can only be
             | successful with "huge budget".
        
       | DubiousPusher wrote:
       | > It's because Hemingway's Boat is broadly "about" a topic,
       | whereas The War of Art promises--and delivers--an outcome.
       | 
       | I certaintly don't know a damn thing about selling books. But I
       | am an avid reader of nonfiction and this is exactly the opposite
       | of how I shop for books myself.
       | 
       | Other than the odd "how-to", I'm skeptical of any book promising
       | me anything other than the author's diligent study and incisive
       | distillation of a topic. I've read many books which caused my
       | mind to grow and really excited me about the world but I've never
       | read a book that "solved my problem". Of which, I assure you, I
       | have many.
        
         | joe_the_user wrote:
         | There are so many issues in all this. I think most self-help
         | and how-to-be-an-entrepreneur books target people who don't
         | read much. On the one hand, it's the bigger market! on the
         | other hand, they don't read much.
         | 
         | These days, most or a large portion of books that have involve
         | substance and research written by academics, who probably would
         | like the books to make money but are OK with them not making
         | money 'cause they still get fame and possibly academic kudos.
         | Of course, there are professional researchers and writers who
         | make a living publishing but they have their substance, they
         | have their niche and they need only very specific advice as
         | opposed to the (apparently confused) generalities of the
         | article.
         | 
         | And thing the author of this website is he seems to aim to sell
         | a book about getting rich writing books and those books would
         | have to be about getting rich too. It's more a multilevel
         | marketing scheme - which doesn't mean someone won't rich here
         | but the entire enterprise is grim and not something I'd want to
         | read about - well, Barbara Ehrenreich's Bait And Switch is
         | somewhat interesting. But still.
        
         | ddorian43 wrote:
         | > but I've never read a book that "solved my problem". Of
         | which, I assure you, I have many.
         | 
         | Curious of your unsolved problems.
        
         | dd_roger wrote:
         | I share your opinion (I particularily like essays; I follow
         | along the arguments, think whether I agree with them or not,
         | etc. but absolutely hate the "how-to" kind of books which I
         | strongly associate with the hustle and self improvement culture
         | that I find quite toxic.)
         | 
         | But I agree with the author that the later kind of books seems
         | much more popular with the general public, being handed
         | solutions appears to be more attractive to many people that
         | being encouraged to think about problems that probably aren't
         | even relevant to them. And in a sense it's perfectly
         | understandable, but I personally prefer the intellectual
         | stimulation from a good essay over what is essentially a
         | marketing speech from a professional hustler.
        
       | gbourne wrote:
       | I got a publishing contract with a larger publisher to write a
       | book on Agile (10 years ago, didn't end up publishing, long
       | story).
       | 
       | I know that amazing feeling the author mentions of getting a
       | "yes", while totally ignoring that at best I was going to make
       | pennies. If I recall it was 10% after all publishing costs were
       | paid for. However, I had a full time job, so this was for-the-
       | love-of-it rather than as a real source of income.
        
         | Multiplayer wrote:
         | I wrote a few books with a major publisher, but did it largely
         | for the authority that it conveyed on my work and career at the
         | time.
         | 
         | Love works too. :)
        
       | ng12 wrote:
       | So 3/4 of the tips are: write a book people want to read?
        
         | Finnucane wrote:
         | No clearly, the message is, write self-help books for wannabe
         | writers.
        
       | okareaman wrote:
       | Shouldn't #5 be "not promoting your book effectively" because
       | he's clearly promoting his book effectively. I think this is fine
       | if fame and fortune are your goal, which is an unquestioned
       | assumption for a lot of people, but there are other reasons to
       | write a book, which he does not address.
        
         | thomaslangston wrote:
         | The point of the article is explaining how a goal of a living
         | wage can be earned directly off nonfiction writing, in addition
         | to two different reasons that are explicitly stated at the
         | beginning of the article as being commonly suggested.
         | 
         | It also explicitly is calling out methods that do not require
         | fame, nor does it espouse a goal of fortune (unless you treat a
         | living wage as a fortune).
        
           | okareaman wrote:
           | He does so dismissively, not treating them seriously: "you
           | should therefore embrace your book's predestined doom by
           | reframing it as either passion project or calling card."
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | In fact, I strongly suspect that the vast majority of people
         | who write non-fiction books are absolutely aware that the
         | royalties will likely be (maybe) beer money--assuming they
         | don't have expensive tastes in beer. Rather they're
         | reputational. In tech, being a published author on a topic
         | often separates people from the pack as consultants but it can
         | also easily differentiate you if you have an externally-facing
         | role (especially) at a company.
         | 
         | Personally, I've made a relatively trivial amount of money from
         | the books I've written, but I have little doubt they've been
         | good investments of my time--some of which has been work time.
         | 
         | ADDED: I'd add that "promoting your book effectively" probably
         | isn't free. Most authors aren't going to get a lot of publisher
         | support so now you're hiring a publicist, paying for review
         | copies, paying to travel (normally) to speak at events where
         | you do book signings and promote your book, etc.
        
           | okareaman wrote:
           | Researching and writing help clarify your thoughts, which
           | could pay dividends in other ways. I'm retired, don't need
           | the money and am told old to care about fame, but I have
           | several ideas for non-fiction books I'm working on. Now that
           | I think about it, his blog post presents a strong case for
           | not writing a non-fiction book for money. There are other
           | ways to spend your time with a better chance of making money,
           | unless you're clever self-promoter that is.
           | 
           | "A 98% drop in sales after the first year, Seventy percent of
           | traditionally published titles fail to pay out a single
           | dollar in royalties, Vanishingly few nonfiction books sell
           | even five hundred copies"
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | That's a great point. It's not just about I have a book.
             | But that, especially if it's through a publisher (which has
             | pros and cons), I have sufficient knowledge of the topic
             | either acquired day-to-day or through research that I'm
             | capable of laying down at least 250 pages or so of coherent
             | writing on said topic. The last book I did I was definitely
             | already familiar with the area but I was certainly more so
             | my the time I was done.
        
       | k__ wrote:
       | Having the right publisher is probably the most important.
       | 
       | I can recommend https://newline.co
       | 
       | I wrote a book with them and made enough to pay my rent for over
       | a year with the money I made.
        
       | fighterpilot wrote:
       | Authors have the same problem as musicians. Their work has zero
       | marginal replication cost, zero distribution cost, low barriers
       | to entry and they're competing for finite attention.
       | 
       | What invariably happens then is the top 0.1 percent of output is
       | duplicated and sold to hundreds of millions of customers and that
       | eats up all of the attention bandwidth for that vertical. It's
       | the ultimate winner take all setup.
       | 
       | Contrast this to the prospect of running a successful restaurant
       | that is fundamentally limited by geography. No matter how well it
       | serves region A, region B, C, D, etc is still up for grabs. A
       | franchise can try to duplicate its success, but it's much more
       | costly than a successful author making endless free digital
       | copies of their work.
        
       | yesenadam wrote:
       | I enjoyed this, I thought it mostly made good points, and it
       | linked to other articles I will look at. Yet..
       | 
       | I started reading a blogger who teaches how to make a successful
       | blog, sells courses about it, etc. I soon realized her blog is
       | just about her making money from promising to help you make money
       | from your blog. A frighteningly vacuous operation. It seems a
       | modern cousin to the old ad in magazines promising to reveal the
       | secret to wealth for $20. When you write to the given address you
       | get a letter back saying "Do as I do." It's a pyramid operation.
       | 
       | Writing books about writing books seems similar. Selling the
       | dream of high sales when you write on other topics, when their
       | books are the same "making money from promising to help you make
       | money" from your book seems a bit fishy, has a scammy element.
       | It's more than a lil "Do as I do."
        
       | Finnucane wrote:
       | He doesn't seem to understand what a royalty is. He quotes
       | himself saying "To compensate for their 85% share of the
       | royalties, a publisher needs to sell at least 5x more copies for
       | you to break even [compared to self-publishing]." As the lady on
       | the tv says, that's not how any of this works. In trade
       | publishing at least, the author's royalty is a percentage of the
       | cover price of the book. In normal retail selling, the publisher
       | gets maybe 50-55% of the cover price in revenue, out of which
       | they have to pay you and also all of their costs of producing
       | your book.
        
         | 101008 wrote:
         | As a publisher author of a non-fiction book with an established
         | publisher, I had to stop reading after that first point because
         | he is completely wrong.
        
           | Multiplayer wrote:
           | I think it makes sense. He's saying that if you get a 15%
           | royalty, vs the 100% royalty minus costs of self publishing,
           | you need to sell 5x more books via the publisher.
           | 
           | It's oddly worded, but the math roughly works depending on
           | your self publishing costs.
        
             | Finnucane wrote:
             | It is not oddly worded. It is wrong.
        
               | jimnotgym wrote:
               | Yes it is an error, but the underlying point is true.
               | 
               | I also thought that, whilst it was easy to recognize the
               | error, the point was still easy to understand. I think it
               | is a good point, let's hope the author redrafts.
        
       | Ronson wrote:
       | I can't comment on the article but after a slow start this year,
       | this HN Post has got me "reading" non-fiction audiobooks again.
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26206712
       | 
       | I am a member of goodreads, it's just hard to find stuff
       | sometimes and cut through the dross. Thank you pizzicato.
        
       | SunlightEdge wrote:
       | Unfortunately most writers of fiction make next to nothing too.
       | Writers often are not happy writing either (unlike painters and
       | video artists who seem to have a whale of a time).
       | 
       | Sadly I toiled for 8 years on a novel (while working a day job).
       | It was a massive effort.
       | 
       | It might be hard for people to understand but I felt I had to
       | write it (i.e. writers curse).
       | 
       | I wish I had spent all that time on studying programming etc.
       | Unfortunately humans are not fully rational. I actually like my
       | novel. But it wasn't worth it.
       | 
       | https://www.amazon.co.uk/Can-Get-Restart-Jack-Gowan-ebook/dp...
       | 
       | But hey that's life. Shrug.
       | 
       | Writers should just write for the pleasure of writing and expect
       | that the majority won't make it. It's about as likely as winning
       | the lottery
        
         | jesselawson wrote:
         | Hey I know you're feeling like giving up, but you have to
         | realize that you've only taken the first step--and the good
         | news is, it's a step that only 10% of people ever make! So
         | congratulations! You published your first novel! Only 10% of
         | people ever finish "that novel" they have in their head that
         | they feel the urge to write. I'm proud of you!
         | 
         | Now for the next part, which no one like's to hear: the easy
         | part is over. Yep, you heard that right: getting your first
         | work finished and out there was relatively easy compared to the
         | mountain you have set yourself on to climb. Yes, only 10% of
         | people dare climb that mountain, and here you are--among the
         | 10%. Now, as you look forward, I can tell you that at every
         | major step, every major obstacle, and every major setback, only
         | 10% of people keep going.
         | 
         | You might think there's a secret to this writing thing, but
         | there isn't. Just like when we're hiking up a mountain, the
         | only thing that matters is putting one foot in front of the
         | other. That's the only way you climb. So you HAVE to get back
         | in there (mentally) and keep going!
         | 
         | You just started on an amazingly difficult and frustrating and
         | beautiful journey in life. You made it to where only 10% of
         | people get to--and now you want to stop the journey?
         | 
         | My friend, your journey has only just begun.
        
           | SunlightEdge wrote:
           | Thanks for your kind words. Perhaps what you say is true. I'm
           | not sure I'm qualified (ironically) to say.
           | 
           | What I can say is that the time, the sacrifice, and then the
           | crappy marketing ploys (no one tells you about that). It's
           | real hard work. It's really hard when you get nothing for all
           | your efforts.
           | 
           | I know a 2nd book would be easier. But it still would take a
           | lot of time. Probably 3-4 years.
           | 
           | Potentially in... a while... I might write again. I am full
           | of ideas. But honestly I'd rather build IT stuff right now.
           | Programming is my new love.
           | 
           | Don't get me wrong there is a real beauty in writing. But,
           | well there is a lot to life. And I'd like to explore
           | different things. There's a ton of creativity in IT.
           | 
           | I can always start writing again when I'm 55/60. I actually
           | don't think it's a young man's activity. There's no money in
           | it either.
           | 
           | But yeah, sitting in the sun during my twilight years...
           | writing. Sounds great.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | zrail wrote:
       | The comments here are incredibly harsh. As someone who has self
       | published two books, quite a lot of this resonates with me.
       | 
       | First book addressed a timely topic but ultimately aged out very
       | quickly and I got burnt out trying to keep up with updates. It
       | made roughly $80,000 in lifetime sales, of which I kept 96%
       | (credit card fees + hosting overhead).
       | 
       | Second book addressed a broader niche but fell into several of
       | the traps he describes and only made $3000.
       | 
       | I will likely buy his book and try to apply it on either a
       | revision of book two or something new.
        
       | cryptica wrote:
       | The real reason why most non-fiction authors don't make a profit
       | is because only scam topics which sell a dream but don't add any
       | real value can make any profit in our current scam economy.
       | 
       | Self-help gurus, spiritual charlatans, snake-oil salesmen, get-
       | rich-quick con men, corporate consultants, slick marketing
       | experts; these are the people who are making profit in our scam
       | economy.
       | 
       | Just focus your energy on a fucking scam and you will make money
       | by the boatload. You don't need a long article to tell you that.
       | Just open your eyes and look around.
       | 
       | It's not just writing which is affected; every 'intellectual'
       | industry is affected; art, music, science, politics,
       | technology... All the successful people are scammers. That's why
       | you can't find any good content anywhere these days. The shit
       | always floats to the top. The media is concentrating all our
       | attention on the shit and away from the good stuff.
       | 
       | Also, the rich people who are running the show are morons with no
       | taste and 0 intellect.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-17 23:00 UTC)