[HN Gopher] Paternoster Lift
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Paternoster Lift
        
       Author : fortran77
       Score  : 95 points
       Date   : 2021-04-18 19:35 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org)
        
       | jiripospisil wrote:
       | I used to use one almost every day when I was studying at CVUT
       | FEL. Sure it looks cool but riding it is not all that great. If
       | you are alone, it's relatively fine. But when multiple people
       | want to get in or out it becomes quite a hassle because you need
       | to move before the lift fully reaches the floor, otherwise
       | there's not enough time for the others. Also, do you know what
       | happens if you touch the inside of the lift's shaft? The whole
       | freaking thing immediately stops. Guess how I know.
       | 
       | If you're curious about what it actually looks like when you loop
       | around, have a look at
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey5b3qm3-EI
        
         | Scene_Cast2 wrote:
         | Ski lifts & air trams solved this problem by uncoupling the
         | passenger unit from the cable at the entry / exit stations -
         | the chairs therefore "loiter" around the passenger area for
         | longer. I think another commenter mentioned a similar system,
         | too.
        
           | ddek wrote:
           | Sadly, impractical in this case. The ski lifts work because
           | there are (usually) only two (but occassionally 3) terminals.
           | In contrast, the point of a paternoster is that every floor
           | is a terminal.
        
             | bombcar wrote:
             | If it hadn't been surpassed by regular elevators you could
             | easily design one that would "drop" a car at a floor and
             | then the next hook would pick it up.
             | 
             | Or just stop turning for a bit. Not worth it likely.
        
               | ddek wrote:
               | Not at all, IMO.
               | 
               | I did a little bit of reasoning after reading this thread
               | (I fucking love paternosters), and thought that any
               | measure you could take to improve the safety or
               | efficiency would likely have a detrimental effect. For
               | example, if you did decouple the carriages at the floors,
               | then there would be a period of accelleration where
               | embarkment would be much more dangerous. People would
               | still attempt to jump onto the carriages during this
               | phase, because we can't avoid people being people. I know
               | for sure I'd take that risk.
               | 
               | I think the way they're run now (slow and steady) is
               | ideal, and investing heavily in sensors so they can stop
               | and restart quickly elevates this. Overengineered
               | solutions about coupling and (god help us) doors will
               | probably solve a couple of minor issues and create a few
               | new major ones.
        
         | jozvolskyef wrote:
         | I used to take the very same paternoster daily, too! The trick
         | is to jump half a metre up or down to give the other person
         | plenty of time to comfortably enter or leave.
        
         | smcl wrote:
         | There is also one at the main ceska posta by Brno hlavni
         | nadrazi. I was excited to try it but I had the same feeling -
         | it's not a place for more than one person. And I am glad I read
         | your sentence about touching the lift shaft before I did it
         | myself because I would have 100% done the same thing.
        
         | lathiat wrote:
         | See also Tom Scott's paternoster video:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgJBD1wf-YQ
        
       | rozab wrote:
       | Tom Scott: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgJBD1wf-YQ
        
       | FiddlerClamp wrote:
       | In David Lodge's novel, "Small World," there's a great scene
       | where one character chases another through a paternoster. The one
       | being chased thinks that the compartment will flip over when it
       | reaches the top, and comes down standing on his head!
        
       | edem wrote:
       | When I was a kid I always wanted to go up to the top but I was
       | afraid that it would turn upside down and I'd fall on my face. I
       | still regret not trying it.
        
       | the-dude wrote:
       | In the 80ies I saw a paternoster filing cabinet at a
       | municipality.
        
         | lb1lf wrote:
         | Paternoster lifts (or a close relative[0]) are sometimes used
         | in warehouses; at a former employer we had two units with X
         | shelves - probably around 20 - each, storing a metric shitload
         | of parts. (Each shelf being approx. 1x4m/3.3x13ft)
         | 
         | Did sound a bit like the Gotterdammerung while it did its
         | thing, but absurdly efficient space utilization.
         | 
         | 0) Close relative as the mechanism is the same, however they
         | tend to only run when a specific storage location is requested,
         | not continuously.)
        
         | throwawayboise wrote:
         | Have seen them at libraries. Somehow they are able to dump off
         | containers of books at the proper floor for reshelving.
        
       | dukoid wrote:
       | The police office in Babylon Berlin has one
        
       | ddek wrote:
       | I wish they weren't as dangerous. They really are a huge
       | improvement on the conventional elevator in terms of efficiency.
       | 
       | At Sheffield, many people are scared of the paternoster so choose
       | the elevators opposite. I'd guess the paternoster riders still
       | outnumber that crowd, by at least a factor of 5. Despite the
       | pressure, there was rarely a queue for the paternoster at 0845,
       | but there was for the two massive elevators opposite. The
       | elevator congestion gets so bad the university employs an
       | attendant, with one carriage assigned to the odd floors, and the
       | other the evens.
       | 
       | The paternoster is just so much easier. You don't have to press a
       | button, wait ages, then have multiple slow stops en-route.
       | 
       | You do occassionally have to wait for a carriage - Sheffield had
       | max 2 per carriage, and it is generally considered rude to get in
       | a carriage with a stranger outside of peak hours. There's also
       | the risk of stoppages, which are particularly painful if your
       | carriage is in the ~1.5m window between floors (+/- 1m based on
       | your athleticism) where you can't find a way to get out. In that
       | case, I hope you're not claustrophobic.
        
       | herodoturtle wrote:
       | Came here expecting to find a heart-warming hitch-hiking story
       | about the quaint village of Paternoster in South Africa.
       | 
       | Learnt about an inventive passenger elevator instead! :-)
        
       | iancmceachern wrote:
       | I did a senior design project in school with the Coors Brewery,
       | largest in the US (world?). I'll always remember their "manlifts"
       | that never stop, and can take you to all floors of the Brewery.
       | Like these...
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/fCPRAjWn8hU
        
       | dang wrote:
       | If curious, past threads:
       | 
       |  _Paternoster Lifts: Cyclic Chain Elevators with No Buttons,
       | Doors or Stops (2016)_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16562742 - March 2018 (112
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _Lovin ' their elevator: why Germans are loopy about
       | paternosters_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10058885 -
       | Aug 2015 (56 comments)
       | 
       |  _Paternoster_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9284672 -
       | March 2015 (72 comments)
        
       | efrafa wrote:
       | There was one at the college where I studied. Scary as hell :)
        
       | andyjohnson0 wrote:
       | The university that I went to in the late eighties had a
       | paternoster in a tall (10+ floor) building and they were great
       | fun. Very quick and easy to move between floors. I always liked
       | using them.
       | 
       | I remember zoneing out once while riding them and accidentally
       | going over the top. From what I remember there was a sign on the
       | wall that faced the compartment after it passed the top floor
       | cautioning you to keep still - presumbly so you didn't trigger a
       | motion sensor while your cab engaged with the drive wheel. It was
       | no big deal.
       | 
       | Second year students used to scare the nervous first year newbies
       | by going under or over and emerging standing on their hands.
        
         | stakkur wrote:
         | Sheffield?
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | eliaspro wrote:
       | Although new Paternosters most likely will never be built, the
       | Thyssen-Krupp Multi has been in development for quite some time
       | now and the result partially resembles Paternoster, but adds
       | things like per-cabin independence and freely routed (also
       | horizontal) movement to the whole idea.
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/E7QlAsxJP-g
       | 
       | I don't know whether there are plans for an actual deployment of
       | this technology right now, but the idea and concept by itself is
       | fascinating.
        
         | TeMPOraL wrote:
         | > _the Thyssen-Krupp Multi has been in development for quite
         | some time now and the result partially resembles Paternoster,
         | but adds things like per-cabin independence and freely routed
         | (also horizontal) movement to the whole idea._
         | 
         |  _Finally_ someone is working to make turbolifts from Star Trek
         | happen.
        
           | caf wrote:
           | Or the Great Glass Elevator from Mr Wonka's chocolate
           | factory.
        
         | flog wrote:
         | By the voiceover, I can always tell a German company produced
         | english video. There's a very particular accent.
        
           | majewsky wrote:
           | Interesting. I'm German, and I cannot recognize any sort of
           | German accent in this.
        
             | lbotos wrote:
             | Not OP for me, Mobility at 47 was a hint, but it's not
             | super noticeable. Dunno what they were picking up on.
        
         | wongarsu wrote:
         | There is also a Tom Scott video about the test tower for the
         | Thyssen Multi, with some more details
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdTsbFS4xmI
         | 
         | It will be interesting to see how it will be used. You really
         | need someone bold enough to design a building around high
         | capacity, 2d elevators. And if the elevators don't work out you
         | have severe problems using the building ... Selling this has to
         | be an uphill battle until it's proven in a few locations.
        
           | eliaspro wrote:
           | I live close to the tower and I was really positively
           | surprised how it turned out. It is located next to Rottweil,
           | the oldest town of Baden-Wurttemberg with a lot of buildings
           | of historical value. There was the fear it would destroy its
           | overall appearance, but I feel like it complements it just
           | perfect. Especially during sunrise/sunset the light creates a
           | beautiful effect on the tower's winding facade.
           | 
           | See: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:TK-
           | Elevator-Te...
           | 
           | https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:TK-Elevator-
           | Te...
           | 
           | https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:TK-Elevator-
           | Te...
        
       | Waterluvian wrote:
       | I'm shocked that they're estimated as being only 30x more
       | dangerous than conventional elevators.
       | 
       | I would have guessed thousands of times more dangerous.
        
         | Someone wrote:
         | They're moving slowly (they get their efficiency from as good
         | as eliminating waiting times, not from moving at high speed),
         | and (typically) are only used in areas where most of the riders
         | are healthy adults (personnel lifts in office buildings)
         | 
         | And as another user already said, they look scary enough to
         | make you pay attention.
        
         | nicklecompte wrote:
         | I think there's a lot going on in that 30x stat and I wish the
         | citation was better:
         | 
         | - most elevator accidents occur during maintenance, which I
         | assume is similar for paternosters. So the fact that elevators
         | are seemingly safer for _passengers_ might not statistically
         | factor in much to the overall safety record: e.g. paternosters
         | could be 1000x as dangerous for passengers but only 5x as
         | dangerous for technicians
         | 
         | - relatedly, I would suspect most paternosters are better
         | maintained than most elevators and less likely to have a
         | dangerous mechanical failure
         | 
         | - and as the commenters stated, passengers are likely to be
         | more alert when using a paternoster (no accidents like stepping
         | in to an empty shaft)
         | 
         | Regardless I suspect you are correct that a well-maintained
         | paternoster is at least hundreds of times more dangerous for
         | passengers than a well-maintained elevator. As far as I can
         | tell the stats given on Wikipedia don't refute that (but I wish
         | I knew more about their source).
        
           | londons_explore wrote:
           | What injuries would be common on a paternoster?
        
             | nicklecompte wrote:
             | I don't think any injuries would be _common_ and that
             | paternosters are safer than stairs and escalators.
             | Intuitively it seems that crushing accidents on the
             | extremities would be quite a bit more likely than
             | elevators, along with tripping accidents when entering
             | /leaving the paternoster.
        
             | bombcar wrote:
             | The obvious one (getting half in the car and getting
             | crushed) is likely relatively uncommon - as it should be
             | possible to make the engine weak enough that it can't do
             | major harm.
        
               | cma wrote:
               | Wouldn't the momentum of the system alone do that?
        
         | tgsovlerkhgsel wrote:
         | I wonder how that compares to escalators, given how safe
         | elevators are.
        
         | hibbelig wrote:
         | Having used one, I guess people just behave differently. For
         | example, when riding an elevator, you might be looking at your
         | smartphone, but if you take the stairs, you don't.
         | 
         | Getting onto and off a paternoster is pretty exciting, so you
         | won't be bored enough to look at the smartphone :-)
        
         | zeotroph wrote:
         | Conventional closing-doors elevators are just absurdly safe,
         | even stairs (moving or non-moving) are more dangerous. People
         | die around elevators when climbing onto the roof when it gets
         | stuck or forcing the doors open instead of staying put. Once it
         | gets moving again bad things can happen.
         | 
         | But as hinted at in the safety section, with modern sensors and
         | some brains behind them paternoster can be made safe. You can
         | even make them wheelchair accessible by gradually stopping a
         | cabin and informing all other passengers about that.
         | 
         | And when a department in a large and busy office building is
         | spread across a few floors then a paternoster is the most
         | efficient way of moving between floors.
        
           | throwawayboise wrote:
           | > Conventional closing-doors elevators are just absurdly
           | safe, even stairs (moving or non-moving) are more dangerous.
           | 
           | I used this argument when my workplace was encouraging people
           | to "take the stairs" for supposed health reasons. It was
           | rejected because science and statistics are only accepted
           | when they support one's desired conclusions.
        
       | brundolf wrote:
       | The name was the most interesting part for me:
       | 
       | > The name paternoster ("Our Father", the first two words of the
       | Lord's Prayer in Latin) was originally applied to the device
       | because the elevator is in the form of a loop and is thus similar
       | to rosary beads used as an aid in reciting prayers.
        
         | dcminter wrote:
         | Huh. I always assumed it was because they looked a bit like a
         | confessional with the two doors side-by-side.
         | 
         | Many years ago I worked in Viscount House (since demolished) at
         | Heathrow Airport where there was a paternoster lift. One day a
         | workman tried to take a wooden ladder through it - it didn't
         | fit. The result was... loud.
         | 
         | I thought it was quite fun to use, but for years after I had
         | minor nightmares about being in the thing with various things
         | going wrong. My subconscious apparently wasn't a fan!
        
           | vbsteven wrote:
           | In Flemish (and probably Dutch but not sure) the word
           | paternoster is used for rosary beads. I had never heard of
           | the paternoster lift before now but just hearing the name
           | made it immediately clear to me what it was.
        
             | dcminter wrote:
             | It makes perfect sense; I just never questioned the
             | etymology I invented.
        
       | cecja wrote:
       | I worked in an agency that had one of these in germany. You are
       | not allowed to build new ones but the ones that are installed can
       | still be used. It's kinda scary for the first three or four times
       | but after that it's an amazing use of transportation in an
       | office. The thing that most people freaks out is going over the
       | turn because everything is dark and you see the motors directly
       | in front of your face.
       | 
       | We dressed ours up as tunnel of horror on halloween, good times.
        
       | omnibrain wrote:
       | There is also the "man engine" which was used in mines until the
       | developement of steel cable based lifts:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_engine
        
       | karmakaze wrote:
       | The first I ever knew of it was in the 1985 German comedy Manner
       | (Men) that featured it in the credits. Intensifyingly funny.
       | 
       | [0] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089656/
        
       | dTal wrote:
       | I wonder what it is about this that captures the Hacker News
       | imagination? Something about it being a "better" solution which
       | we, as a society, have been inexplicably denied?
        
       | nelsonmandela wrote:
       | Why don't they have them tick like clocks so it actually stops at
       | a floor?
        
         | alisonkisk wrote:
         | Wikipedia days Hitachi launched one that does that.
         | 
         | Why never before? Because modern elevators were invented.
        
       | Vaslo wrote:
       | Literally lost 30 mins on YouTube watching these things in
       | action. Thanks?
        
       | zeke wrote:
       | There were several in Stuttgart. One at a Uni building, which
       | I've heard is now defunct. Two are in the Stuttgart Rathaus. They
       | may still be in service.
       | 
       | I was showing my son that the floor will fold up so it won't cut
       | your foot off, but I did not see the switch attached. The floor
       | edge folded up, the switch stopped the Paternoster and sounded
       | the alarm. I apologized to people there that there was no real
       | problem and waited a few minutes for them to turn it back on. My
       | son told on me when we got home.
        
       | Someone wrote:
       | That page got me to https://www.humphrey-manlift.com/belt-
       | manlift/
       | 
       | It surprises me that, apparently, you can still buy these. They
       | look too risky to me for modern risk-averse society (what if
       | personnel carries a ruck sack? Is too voluminous to fit through
       | that floor hole?)
        
         | tgsovlerkhgsel wrote:
         | I assume this is addressed by only having them accessible for
         | trained personnel vs. the general public. It could also be
         | solved by having a pressure sensitive, breakaway panel that
         | stops the lift (triggers one stopping distance before a hard
         | edge is reached).
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | I don't really see that as much more dangerous than various
         | other forms of heavy equipment - think bucket trucks and those
         | forklift attachments that turn them into bucket trucks - vs
         | climbing a power pole.
        
         | jjt-yn_t wrote:
         | While they were in use in the 1980s, where I worked, 50 yards
         | or so away was the elevator option if you were carrying
         | anything, say, not belt-attachable thus leaving both hands free
         | for the manlift. Great timesaver. Some years later removed and
         | the concrete space covered with a metal plate.
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | Probably more dangerous than a Peloton threadmill.
        
         | lmilcin wrote:
         | I think this is wrong way to use word "dangerous".
         | 
         | "Dangerous" should be left for when it easy for a normal person
         | to get hurt or get somebody else hurt even when they are
         | attentive and act rationally.
         | 
         | A device that can suddenly explode when correctly used is
         | "dangerous".
         | 
         | I think this lift is perfectly safe as is Peloton threadmil,
         | knives, cars, and bunch other stuff, because each can be
         | operated safely and more than that, it is with a capability of
         | a normal person to operate the device safely. Whether they
         | choose to do so is another matter.
         | 
         | The threadmill cases were due to adults leaving safety keys in
         | the threadmill.
         | 
         | How is a threadmill with a functional safety key described as
         | "dangerous" because some stupid parent left it with a key in?
         | 
         | If you are a moron you can make anything dangerous.
        
           | dbavaria wrote:
           | What stops a child/pet from injury even when an adult is
           | properly using the safety key?
           | 
           | Plastic bags are not inherently dangerous to most adults, but
           | we consider them to be a danger for animals and small
           | children. Danger in this context extends to more than your
           | target demographic for a product.
        
           | alisonkisk wrote:
           | You'll find communication easier if you use the common shared
           | meanings of words.
        
       | jjgreen wrote:
       | Terrific things, there is one at the University in Sheffield. At
       | the start of each academic year, freshers dare each-other to "go
       | around the bottom" to the extent that there are stern warnings
       | posted about this unbalancing the mechanism and leading to it
       | stopping working (I'm pretty sure that's not true).
        
         | KineticLensman wrote:
         | We routinely over traveled in the paternoster in the Lecture
         | theatres at the Uni of Leeds in the 1980s. If you were on the
         | top floor the queues to go down could be very long so it was
         | faster to go up and over and effectively jump the queu.
         | 
         | Never saw any injuries, incidentally
        
         | dejv wrote:
         | We have two functional paternosters in my hometown and you can
         | easily drive around the clock in them. There are warning signs,
         | but once you miss the last stop there are another signs that
         | tell you not to panic.
        
           | the-dude wrote:
           | Reminds me about an elevator in a hotel in LA, around ~2008.
           | The hotel and the elevator made the distinct impression of
           | being about a century old. Maybe it even said so in the
           | brochure.
           | 
           | In the elevator there was a plaquate(?) wich said something
           | like _in case of an emergency, don 't panic_. I mean, in
           | which cases are we supposed to panic then?
        
             | alisonkisk wrote:
             | It's fine to panic in safe situations.
        
         | dash2 wrote:
         | Essex has (had?) one too, with the warning/invitation:
         | "Overtravel in lift is not dangerous, but not recommended."
        
           | twic wrote:
           | As I remember it, it said "overtravel through the loft and
           | sump ...". Overtravel through the sump was somehow a lot less
           | appealing than through the loft.
        
         | Dyac wrote:
         | My mother visited my sister at Sheffield University years ago
         | and accidentally ended up going over the top-of course it was
         | fine but it somehow took her by surprise and she mentions it
         | every time the topic of Sheffield comes up.
        
           | ddek wrote:
           | 'accidentally'
           | 
           | Like, there's no problem with going around the top. At
           | Sheffield, the mechanics are all hidden away enough that the
           | risk of catching something is fairly low. These areas became
           | a site of illicit advertisements. Some of the best raves were
           | publicised with posters over the top, for example.
           | 
           | The bigger risk is that the lift stops while you're in the
           | top. Even then, it usually gets going within 20 minutes.
        
             | gregoriol wrote:
             | 20 minutes ? wow, that's quite a long time to spend in such
             | a small place and if you are outside the normal zone
        
         | userbinator wrote:
         | I think the warning is more to discourage people from using the
         | other direction as a shortcut.
         | 
         | That, and the huge chain wheels at the ends are even more
         | dangerous to get things stuck in.
        
           | alisonkisk wrote:
           | Going in the wrong direction is never a shortcut. It could be
           | used to avoid waiting for an empty car.
        
             | frosted-flakes wrote:
             | Hence, a shortcut.
        
         | scroot wrote:
         | Shout out to the arts tower at Uni Sheffield, the first place I
         | ever saw one of these!
        
         | shazzy wrote:
         | Here is a segment that The One Show did on the University in
         | Sheffield one, for anyone who is interested in seeing it in
         | action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAjYAfb_HPk
        
       | ndom91 wrote:
       | Have ridden the ones at Goethe Uni in Frankfurt, Germany. Love
       | them!
        
       | inglor_cz wrote:
       | There are some Paternosters still in operation in Czechia. Funny
       | stuff when you're young, but any infirmity or trouble walking
       | pretty much precludes you from using them.
        
       | andrepd wrote:
       | Obligatory Tom Scott: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgJBD1wf-YQ
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-18 23:00 UTC)