[HN Gopher] Mars has right ingredients for present-day microbial... ___________________________________________________________________ Mars has right ingredients for present-day microbial life: study Author : hhs Score : 85 points Date : 2021-04-24 18:42 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.brown.edu) (TXT) w3m dump (www.brown.edu) | Daniel_sk wrote: | There are even mysterious (with hypothetical biological origin) | geysers on Mars: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geysers_on_Mars | OmicronCeti wrote: | To be perfectly honest they're not that mysterious. In the | Martian science community they're called araneiforms, and the | biological origin hypothesis is fairly fringe. Lots of good | reading in these papers: | | - "The formation of araneiforms by carbon dioxide venting and | vigorous sublimation dynamics under martian atmospheric | pressure": https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-82763-7 | | - "HiRISE observations of gas sublimation-driven activity in | Mars' southern polar regions: III. Models of processes | involving translucent ice": | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001910350... | | - "How martian araneiforms get their shapes: morphological | analysis and diffusion-limited aggregation model for polar | surface erosion": | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001910351... | paulpauper wrote: | For almost half a century, scientists have been speculating about | sub-surface life on mars. Why with existing technological | progress can we not just get a yes or no answer about this. | heavyset_go wrote: | Because determining a yes or no answer requires running tests | and examinations of Martian subsurface soil samples on Earth. | | Part of Perseverance's mission is to take those soil samples | and deposit them to be picked up and brought back to Earth on | another later mission. | | https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/spacecraft/rover/sample-handl... | highspeedbus wrote: | Several experiments have already been carried out, but none | have been able to fully prove or refute the existence of life | on mars. There is still room for more evidence and precision, | but most likely there is no life there. | adt2bt wrote: | If I had to guess: planets are big, rocks are hard, and if | there is life, it's vanishingly rare or hard to find. | ssijak wrote: | Google something like "mars viking life experiments" | freeflight wrote: | For a moment there I was thinking: "Wait, Vikings have been | to Mars?", turns out NASA had a Viking program that sent | two space probes to Mars in the 70s [0] | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viking_lander_biological_ | exper... | mrfusion wrote: | I'll answer your question with a question. Would space | exploration get more or less funding if we settled a | fundamental question about the existence of life outside earth? | eggsmediumrare wrote: | Probably more. | NanoWar wrote: | What happens when we'd put some microbes there now? | levosmetalo wrote: | I'm more concerned what happens when we bring some microbes | from Mars. | paulpauper wrote: | things that go to mars tend to stay there | ceejayoz wrote: | That's changing very soon. | | Perseverance's mission includes collecting and storing | samples for a return mission. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_sample-return_mission | astroflask wrote: | And also things that have gone to Mars in the past have | blasted off chunks of Mars into Earth. | daveguy wrote: | Andromeda Strain makes a good story, but viruses and bacteria | tend to evolve with their hosts and environment. It is | unlikely that any virus or bacteria brought from mars would | have a serious impact on humans or our environment. We | probably aren't good hosts to something that's been evolving | in martian conditions. | csunbird wrote: | We probably have done this already, with the man made machines | that we had sent. Although the NASA tries to sterilize the | robots/rovers, I doubt that they can kill every bacteria and | some of the bacteria are known to somehow survive when exposed | to space as well. | Thiez wrote: | Earth bacteria require liquid water (amongst other things). | Thus far none of the rovers have landed in a lake, so it's | unlikely that earth bacteria will be spreading any time soon. | karmakaze wrote: | What's more important: knowing if Mars had/has life on it or | having life on it? | x86ARMsRace wrote: | I've been curious about this recently actually. What are the | downsides of "seeding" a plant with life to study how it | evolves? | ben_w wrote: | Means it's hard to tell, if we find life there later, if that | life was native or if we put it there. | anikan_vader wrote: | It becomes much more difficult to determine whether the | planet contains indigenous life once you've introduced life | from Earth. | greenonions wrote: | I'm also a fan of this idea. It seems far easier than trying | to plant humans in giant bubbles with an Earthly ecosystem | that just happen to be on the surface of Mars. | | As other commenters have noted, it's probably not very wise, | but I imagine it would be the cheapest way to increase the | chances of the continuation of life (as we know it). | torstenvl wrote: | Maybe after initial terraforming you could also seed it with | a specially engineered retrovirus to help evolution along by | tweaking genes associated with prosociality. | quesera wrote: | Evolution takes a long time. And there aren't many (any) | environments that we've identified and can reach which are | conducive to the sort of life we know about. Also it'd be a | bit presumptuous for us to colonize a hospitable planet for | our own experimentation. | | But it's an interesting question. In fiction, I can recommend | Adrian Tchaikovsky's _Children of Time_ , and sequel | _Children of Ruin_. | jakswa wrote: | The fear I read is that we might be accidentally eradicating | any life we don't yet know about, if we introduce life from | earth. | pm90 wrote: | Imagine if an alien lifeform had terraformed earth this way. | We would not have existed. | | (There is a hypothesis that life _may_ have been introduced | this way to earth, known as the Panspermia Hypothesis | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panspermia) | throwawayboise wrote: | There are so many chance events that could have gone | differently and we would not have existed. | | If not for an asteroid, the earth might still be populated | with dinosaurs. Would they have evolved to our degree of | intelligence and civilization? Who knows? | bpodgursky wrote: | I don't understand the excitement for finding life on Mars. I | personally really, really hope we do not find life on Mars. | | If we find even the most basic microbial life, NASA is going to | shut down all future exploration in the interest of Martian | planetary protection. China and Russia probably won't, but the US | will cripple itself (again) out of caution. | | On a more existential level, finding life elsewhere in the solar | system (assuming it's not diaspora from earth or vice versa) says | really dark things about our own potential. If life is truly | common in the universe, the fact that we haven't seen it anywhere | means that the great filter is still in front of us -- and nobody | has slipped through. | | OTOH, if the great filter is behind is, there's no data about our | likelihood of killing ourselves before we do manage to explore | the rest of the known universe. This is such a better outcome. | Hammershaft wrote: | Alternatively both instances of life could be linked. | https://www.space.com/22577-earth-life-from-mars-theory.html | | That said my gut says hypothetically talking about the danger | of a universal great filter is silly when we clearly face near | term filters of our own design right now (climate change, | environmental collapse, a nuclear arms race) | sthnblllII wrote: | Massive loss of life or economic disruption, while hugely | bad, is not what a great filter means in this context. If | earth's climate returns to pre-holocene greenhouse gas | levels, temperature and sea levels the human race would not | be cut off from the stars in a fundamental way. | mulcahey wrote: | did you read Bostrom's article with the same opinion? | | https://www.nickbostrom.com/extraterrestrial.pdf | throwawaycuriou wrote: | first I've seen it but my initial thought is that he does not | think probable as much as I do that a great filter may exist | in the practicality of interstellar travel. if so, it's not a | buzzkill to find pangolin skeletons on mars. we're all in | this cul de sac together. | solson4 wrote: | I think the excitement is that it would give us another data | point for what life can possibly be like. So far (AFAIK) the | best evidence is that life evolved once on earth, and so | everything we see comes from that basic blue print. But does it | have to be that way? Would alien life also be carbon based, or | something else? Is DNA/RNA (or a close equivalent) a universal | feature of life? If not what do they use instead? If so, that's | also very interesting. There's just so many questions we can't | answer when the sample size is one. I guess my belief (hope?) | is that that curiosity would spur further exploration, not kill | it. | | As for the great filter, yeah, it's a bit scary if we rule out | bio-genesis as an option, but that still leaves the single to | multi cell jump behind us (and arguably development of human | level cooperation/problem solving, but I'm less sold on that | one). | freeflight wrote: | _> China and Russia probably won 't, but the US will cripple | itself (again) out of caution._ | | Do you have any concrete examples when this happened before? | Writing (again) implies you think there was already such a | precedent. | highspeedbus wrote: | I'm always on side of knowing than not knowing. Finding truly | alien life would change society forever, maybe we would get | more humble. As Carl Sagan put on Pale Blue Dot. | zopa wrote: | Pretty confident we'd still explore, just with some | (appropriate) care. Too many fascinating scientific questions | to answer once we discover extraterrestrial life. And if Russia | and China did, the US definitely would too --- what would be | the point of standing on principal in that hypothetical? | | Meanwhile if you're hoping, why not just hope directly that the | Great Filter is behind us? It's totally plausible that the | window for multicellular life to survive on a planet is | generally short, like on Mars, and not long, like on Earth. Or | a million other possible explanations that we also have no data | for or against right now. I like to keep my science-related | hopes on the side of the coolest possible result . | drannex wrote: | Perhaps that would be a benefit, it could spur action to focus | more and create L5 colonies faster. | PicassoCTs wrote: | The great filter is that tech is to easy, but self-awareness | and self-discipline is hard. So life presses onwards, demanding | exponential energy density from tech, to not be forced to limit | itself and self-discipline itself. | | Thus ever more potent tools are handed out to avoid | confrontation with the "overcome" animal nature - and once that | equation reaches the end of the line (easy energy and resources | exhausted), a nearly unchanged animal with exponential power | tools in hand, reverts to tribalistic warfare. Nothing recovers | from this. | | The greatest damage done, is the lie that life can learn and | change, which never holds up under stress. The most valuable | achievement to escape the filter, is investigate our nature | realistically and apply controlled technological crippling, | while testing the tools to calm the evil spirits of our nature, | even under stress. | | So technology is the problem and the solution, if applied with | a real effort to understand humanity, beyond the "I wish for X | and by the magic of wishful thinking it becomes reality | instantly". Its hard work - similar to somebody diagnosing ones | own mental limitations, and building a limited operating system | for that crippled system. In a way- its the ultimate hack. | danlugo92 wrote: | There could be civilizations out there that never developed | aggression. | dotancohen wrote: | If they never developed aggression then they are not eating | each other. Animals eat other animals because of the high | concentration of nutrients in living things. Eating highly | nutritious things allows an organism to develop both | physically and mentally. | | So they either have an abundant source of nutrients that | has not been depleted for their entire evolution, or they | are not highly developed, or they have developed | aggression. | PicassoCTs wrote: | http://akkartik.name/post/2012-11-21-07-09-03-soc | throwawayboise wrote: | Billions of people were just asked to spend over a year | locked down in isolation, and most did it voluntarily without | reverting to tribalistic warfare (threats on fringe social | media platforms notwithstanding). We've also in modern times | seen what happens when famine strikes. Mostly people just | suffer quietly and die. | PicassoCTs wrote: | Ah slight economic down-turn sparked a right-wing | totalitarian resurgence across the whole world. | | The lockdown mostly worked, because panem (food) and | circensis (movie-streams and gaming) were continuously | supplied. But, yes you have a point, the species behaved | remarkably well under stress. But then, we also have a lot | of social implants now too (cellphone-panopticon) and | crowd-sourced anger-management. | | Also its been half a year, since a angry crowd stampeded | into the capitol building of a nuclear power. | harshalizee wrote: | Personally, I don't believe in the great filter hypothesis. The | universe is incredibly vast enough entire civilizations can | likely go through millions of years of births and deaths | without ever having contact with another alien life form. | Humans have a huge bias to feel "special". | | We've only been broadcasting radio waves for a few decades now, | and even that would just be lost in the background noise at | large distances. | | It would be extremely surprising if we even find any life | outside the solar system for at least a few centuries. | bpodgursky wrote: | I don't think this gives appropriate weight to exponential | growth. | | If humans are ever able to leave the earth and even | theoretically establish permanent habitation, it's | unthinkable that no other civilization has done so. | throwawayboise wrote: | Even so the galaxy (let alone the universe) is huge, and | faster-than -light or extra-dimensional travel is probably | impossible. Contact with another civilization is extremely | unlikely even if life is abundant in the galaxy. | illegalmemory wrote: | We don't have "full" understanding of human body and working of | mind. I suspect in future humans who take birth and grow in | different scenarios like earth natural / earth urban / mars urban | and so on to have different life spans and body capacities. | [deleted] | jonplackett wrote: | It's strange that we have to speculate about if life could have | emerged on Mars, without really knowing for sure how it emerged | on Earth. | monkeydust wrote: | Curious, will the samples collected via mars return mission | provide proof beyond doubt on this assertion? | zokier wrote: | As I understand, the samples collected by Perseverance and | returned by Mars Sample Return will be taken at surface level. | So they will not be able to tell that much about the sub- | surface. Also of course that is just one small region that | Percy is taking samples from, it can not provide proof about | conditions of other regions of the planet. | aardvarkr wrote: | That's the hope! Though the rover should have most of the | scientific equipment that it needs to run the relevant | experiments right there on the surface of Mars. | f430 wrote: | is anybody going to talk about the numerous and very obvious | artificial structures on Mars and Moon? Just shut up and chalk it | up to conspiracy right like a good American. | ben_w wrote: | The only obvious examples of either are the ones humans put | there -- the probes, the rovers, the Apollo Lunar Modules and | associated material. | f430 wrote: | so you mean we've figured out how to build large structures | outside planet earth without the public knowing? | OmicronCeti wrote: | Please link to any of these 'large structures' otherwise | we'll just continue to assume this is being pulled from | your ass. | dvh wrote: | What structures? | OmicronCeti wrote: | I'm a PhD candidate studying Mars, happy to debunk any | structures you can supply. | f430 wrote: | PHD won't save you here. | | Literally pyramids and megastructures with uniform and clear | patterns of engineered structures. There's really nothing you | can say here to convince me otherwise. There's zero chance of | a large pyramid structure with accurate math proportions and | geometric consistencies occuring by "chance" | | I don't know about other stuff you are speaking of but | there's almost no explanation you can give to convice the 47% | of the Americans that don't believe you. | OmicronCeti wrote: | Assuming this is even in good faith, can you link any | images or data of these supposed structures? I spend hours | a day examining HiRISE/CTX imagery and have never seen | anything like you're asserting. | JaimeThompson wrote: | Providing the locations of the items in question would | allow a more fruitful discussion to take place. | dotancohen wrote: | How does f430 know this and people who study the Moon and | Mars as a profession do not know this? | f430 wrote: | becaue the people who study Mars professionally will | never ever be allowed to disclose or deviate beyond the | tiny bubble of academia Mr. Cohen. | | after all, they are just another subordinate of a massive | defense industry umbrella. | gaurav_v wrote: | There is a very good book on the origins of life on earth by Eric | Smith, called "The Origin and Nature of Life on Earth." | | Here's a YouTube talk with some of the arguments: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cwvj0XBKlE ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-04-24 23:00 UTC)