[HN Gopher] 99 Bits of Unsolicited Advice ___________________________________________________________________ 99 Bits of Unsolicited Advice Author : jcs87 Score : 104 points Date : 2021-04-26 18:26 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (kk.org) (TXT) w3m dump (kk.org) | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote: | > Money is overrated. Truly new things rarely need an abundance | of money. If that was so, billionaires would have a monopoly on | inventing new things, and they don't. Instead almost all | breakthroughs are made by those who lack money, because they are | forced to rely on their passion, persistence and ingenuity to | figure out new ways. Being poor is an advantage in innovation. | | Completely disagree. A lot of the great innovations actually came | from people who were already wealthy enough that they could spend | time contemplating instead of figuring out where their next meal | was coming from. | bena wrote: | The one I really don't like is "Always say less than necessary." | | I've never seen any good come from withholding necessary | information. | vageli wrote: | > The one I really don't like is "Always say less than | necessary." | | > I've never seen any good come from withholding necessary | information. | | Surely being selective with information is advantageous in | negotiations? | swyx wrote: | this one really stuck with me: "The foundation of maturity: Just | because it's not your fault doesn't mean it's not your | responsibility." | | heck. that's just true. really put into words something i've | taken a while to learn (and am still learning). | pachico wrote: | Well, there's an interesting amount of proof that Mother Teresa | could indeed make a lot of art, really tons of art, it seems... | dredmorbius wrote: | Of fasteners: know the reverse-threading exceptions as well. | | https://www.liveabout.com/what-is-a-reverse-threaded-bolt-28... | Baeocystin wrote: | Unsolicited advice? Fair enough. Unsolicited comment- the ones | related to money are spoken like someone who has never actually | been poor, and are, frankly, insulting. | | Even a cursory look at who has developed what over the years | shows that people who actually had the resources to do whatever | it was that interested them are the ones in the history books. | Who knows how many others of equal or greater talent spent their | whole lives scraping by instead. | coldtea wrote: | > _Even a cursory look at who has developed what over the years | shows that people who actually had the resources to do whatever | it was that interested them are the ones in the history books._ | | In areas like startups, where family connections, early | education, family environment, and fallbacks, matter, yes. | | But the 20th century was full of people from poor backgrounds | (includings immigrants arriving with 0 dollars) making it in | e.g. arts. So much so, that the "starving artist" is a cliche. | | (And of course, starting and succesfully running regular | businesses - the 99% of businesses kind, from grocery stores | and restaurants to design studios and software houses, not the | 0.0001% that is VC-backed startups sold for b/millions). | SaltyBackendGuy wrote: | > Advice like these are not laws. They are like hats. If one | doesn't fit, try another. | | Lists like these are full of survivor bias. In fact, it's baked | into it. | coldtea wrote: | On the other hand, survivor bias, when it's not about "to | make it big, start as a millionaire heir" can also be another | name for "worked for me, so there's at least a single living | proof that it can work". | nine_k wrote: | The entire concept of evolution is built on survivor bias. | uoaei wrote: | I'm not sure what you meant by this but it comes across as | a quip attempting to be witty and piercing but completely | missing the point. | shanecleveland wrote: | I can't disagree with your point that resources and opportunity | beget more resources and more opportunity. I don't think that | is the only path to success. | | I also see advice in here that implies he tried and failed at | many things, and perhaps was most successful when not focused | so much on money: | | * A multitude of bad ideas is necessary for one good idea. | | * Most overnight successes -- in fact any significant successes | -- take at least 5 years. Budget your life accordingly. | | * Don't create things to make money; make money so you can | create things. The reward for good work is more work. | elric wrote: | > When playing Monopoly, spend all you have to buy, barter, or | trade for the Orange properties. Don't bother with Utilities. | | This one struck me as being particularly random, even in a list | of pretty random items. Can anyone with Monopoly mojo expand on | this? | compiler-guy wrote: | https://monopoly.fandom.com/wiki/Orange_Color_Group_Properti... | | Statistically, the Orange property set is one of the most | frequented sets in the game due to the approximately 37% chance | of landing on one upon the first turn after leaving jail; the | most visited space on the board. In combination with a | relatively cheap development cost, the Orange property set can | be valuable to own. | shanecleveland wrote: | * That thing that made you weird as a kid could make you great as | an adult -- if you don't lose it. | | I wish I could have grasped this as a kid, and I wish I could | explain this to my kids now and have them understand/believe me. | | My kids each have their own unique personalities, strengths, | weaknesses, etc. But they all have to funnel through the same | general requirements of school and such. It is too easy to fall | into the trap of getting them to "conform." But I want to be able | to nurture the "weird" in them! | bigthymer wrote: | I found Bezos' last letter inspiring in this regard. Especially | one of the last sections titled "Differentiation is Survival | and the Universe Wants You to be Typical". | | link here -> https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/15/jeff-bezos- | releases-final-le... | shanecleveland wrote: | I like the analogy he makes here. | | There is a balance in here somewhere to learn how to | navigate, adapt and live within a society/community that | favors set standards and "normality" without muting out | uniqueness, personal interests, etc. | coldtea wrote: | > _Differentiation is Survival and the Universe Wants You to | be Typical_ | | "Oh, and while you differentiate, those of you on my | warehouses don't forget to work 10 hour shifts and pee in | bottles, so that I can get a few dollars more per hour from | each disposable you" | 01100011 wrote: | That's a tough one for me. I seem to be stuck on an axis of | either being nerdy, anti-social, physically unfit and | intelligent or outgoing, stupid, and physically fit. I've | varied along the axis throughout my life and never managed to | be a good nerd while also being mentally and physically | healthy. I've seen a lot of other people do it, it's just not | something I've been able to pull off. | | I work with a lot of people who remind me of my former self and | I'm afraid to encourage them to find balance in their lives | because I don't want them to lose their genius like I feel I | did. It's tough when you grow up a nerd and find most of your | self-worth and security in your intellectual superiority and | then lose it because you thought the grass was greener on the | other side. | shanecleveland wrote: | I think the real revelation comes in understanding that the | grass will always appear greener on the other side, | regardless of which side you find yourself on. That is a hard | thing to understand without having gone through that. | | Edit, such this additional advice: | | * If you can avoid seeking approval of others, your power is | limitless. | abhinuvpitale wrote: | Great advice. Looking at the headline, I thought this article was | originally about bit-encoding, since it mentioned 99 bits. | standardUser wrote: | I just learned how to tie a bowline knot. | | 5 stars | swyx wrote: | what have you used it on? | GloriousKoji wrote: | It's useful for when you need a loop and a secure knot that | won't slip or become undone. Basically where you would do a | regular knot but need more knot strength. | | I've used it for securing crab pods, pulling out a small | tree, hanging decorations from ceiling hooks, as the front | anchor for strapping down things to the top of my car, | connecting lines to kites and tying the tea bag string to the | handle of my coworkers mug as a prank to name a few uses of | the top of my head. | | I've also used it for climbing in certain situations but I | would highly recommend learning the figure 8 and using that | for all climbing things related. | barbazoo wrote: | Learning how to use knots is just so satisfying, I don't know | what it is, I can't really put my finger on it. | RaceWon wrote: | >> I can't really put my finger on it. | | Plus 1 | waynesonfire wrote: | I agree! I recall a time when I spent an hour in a home depot | parking lot strapping down lumber to the roof of my car | practicing the trucker's hitch. | | https://www.animatedknots.com/truckers-hitch-knot | phaemon wrote: | No matter what use ECC RAM; you may have 99 bits but the problem | is one. | nwiswell wrote: | "I got 99 popcount but the parity ain't one" | vlmutolo wrote: | > Be strict with yourself and forgiving of others. The reverse is | hell for everyone. | | I think this is generally good advice, but it's equally important | to not be too hard on yourself. You have to learn to forgive | yourself for mistakes. | mym1990 wrote: | Some fun, interesting, true, and meh bits of wisdom here! | | These 2 stuck out as ironic being back to back: | | * I have never met a person I admired who did not read more books | than I did. | | * The greatest teacher is called "doing". | | Although without more context, its just a snap judgement. | Admiring only people who are well read(assuming OP reads a lot) | seems to leave a bit on the table. | lostmsu wrote: | Re: books. Surprisingly I met such a person recently. She does | not read books at all these days, and haven't been in a while | (except textbooks in academia years). Got PhD in physics, and | doing well for herself. | claudiawerner wrote: | >* I have never met a person I admired who did not read more | books than I did. | | I think Schopenhauer has good words of advice on this topic | (and the irony of reading this advice in a book is not lost on | me; emphasis mine): | | >Hence, in regard to reading, it is a very important thing to | be able to refrain. Skill in doing so consists in not taking | into one's hands any book merely because at the time it happens | to be extensively read; such as political or religious | pamphlets, novels, poetry, and the like, which make a noise, | and may even attain to several editions in the first and last | year of their existence. Consider, rather, that the man who | writes for fools is always sure of a large audience; be careful | to limit your time for reading, and devote it exclusively to | the works of those great minds of all times and countries, who | o'ertop the rest of humanity, those whom the voice of fame | points to as such. These alone really educate and instruct. | _You can never read bad literature too little, nor good | literature too much. Bad books are intellectual poison; they | destroy the mind._ Because people always read what is new | instead of the best of all ages, writers remain in the narrow | circle of the ideas which happen to prevail in their time; and | so the period sinks deeper and deeper into its own mire. | quickthrower2 wrote: | Reading books seems to be put on a pedestal here and in other | places online. I don't read many I prefer doing and online | video courses | einpoklum wrote: | Uh... you probably want to complete that paragraph with a | "and still I have achieved XYZ in life", otherwise you're | just an anonymous commenter :-\ | qsort wrote: | "Advice like these are not laws. They are like hats. If one | doesn't fit, try another." | grey-area wrote: | I preferred this one: | | Un bon mot ne prouve rien. | dspillett wrote: | _> Leave a gate behind you the way you first found it._ | | Not sure this one is generally applicable. When I'm out running | are walking trails I always close gates unless there appears to | be specific reason not to. Some people carelessly leave them | open, some do so accidentally, some mistakenly think it should be | left open because it was when they went through but there has | been a steady flow if people leaving it for the next one and the | first opened it. | shanecleveland wrote: | * Compliment people behind their back. It'll come back to you. | | Such a hard thing to quantify - and attempting to quantify it | misses the point - but I think this is such an under appreciated | point. | | I know that I am quick to gossip or talk about other people's | failings behind their back. Partly, I think it is easy for people | to relate to each other based on a shared view of someone else. | And, unfortunately, I think it is easier to come up with negative | examples to talk about. | | Imagine if more of us found opportunities to say something good | about someone just because. | uoaei wrote: | Opportunities of this kind are not found, but made. | jeppesen-io wrote: | > * Always cut away from yourself. | | I like this link but but I don't know what that means | notenoughbeans wrote: | I learned it as: | | "Never get yourself bloody. Always cut towards a buddy." | taejo wrote: | When using a knife, saw, axe, etc. or other cutting implement | always make sure the blade is moving away from all parts of | your body. | magicalhippo wrote: | My granddad being a woodworking teacher, I learned that | lesson early on. | | However when redecorating my house there were several | occasions where it simply was not possible to do that. I | usually countered my cutting hand with my "free" hand, | effectively pushing my cutting hand away from my body as I | performed the cut. At least then I had pretty good control in | the event my blade were to slip. | barbazoo wrote: | My father in law has one rule: Don't get any blood on it. | jeppesen-io wrote: | Ahhh - literal. I was thinking figuratively | dredmorbius wrote: | Both. | | Literal: move the blade / cutting edge away from you. | | Figurative: apply hazardous effort in a manner that it | dissipates in the direction or mode of least harm. | rednerrus wrote: | > The worst evils in history have always been committed by those | who truly believed they were combating evil. Beware of combating | evil. | CoastalCoder wrote: | Am I just showcasing my own ignorance by wanting support for | this claim? | | I've heard it stated elsewhere, but I've never heard a detailed | argument supporting it. The closest justification I recall | hearing is a vague reference to the Spanish Inquisition. | dionidium wrote: | I think where you really see this is in any case where one | group identifies another group that they perceive to be their | oppressor and then having done so, imagine themselves to be | justified in leveling a retributive response. (The example I | used in another comment above was the mass enslavement and | starvation of the kulaks in revolutionary Russia on the | grounds that they had been oppressors of the proletariat.) | inglor_cz wrote: | At the risk of Godwining this thread, Hitler was really, | really convinced that Jews were evil schemers that dealt in | betrayal, fraud and conspiracy against innocent and naive | Gentiles. And that their destruction was a necessary step to | cleanse the Earth off their evil. | | The end result: Auschwitz. | spijdar wrote: | It goes back even further, actually, and provides another | data-point for this aphorism. The Teutonic Order, a sort of | ... indirect relative/precursor [0] to the German | Empire/Republic which the Nazis grew in was notorious for | doing some really horrific things in the name of God, and | in trying to force convert the lands north of | Prussia/Poland. The surrounding Christians states didn't | really approve of this, and eventually pushed them back. | They seemed to be pretty obsessed themselves with the idea | that other Christians were backstabbing and betraying their | cause. | | It seems their cause was, originally, in good intentions. | I'll give them the benefit of the doubt at least. But it's | clear by the end they fulfilled this aphorism, and became a | great evil by trying to fight evil. | | [0] The Teutonic Order held land, the "Deutschordensstaat". | When Martin Luther convinced the then-Grand-Master Albert | to convert, he turned that land into a secular state, the | Duchy of Prussia, which became the Kingdom of Prussia, | which became the leading state of the German Empire. | CJefferson wrote: | I agree, but I also imagine all those fighting the Nazis | also thought they were fighting evil. Should they have | "beware fighting evil"? | benjohnson wrote: | Yes. After seeing what the Nazis had done, those that | fought the Nazis would have been justified in exacting | immediate justice by killing all of them. | | Thankfully - they didn't. | bena wrote: | If you believe your enemy is truly and irredeemably evil, | what tactics are allowed to eradicate that evil? | | Technically, anything should be allowed, because removing | that evil from the world would be an undeniable good. To find | that evil, you should be allowed to do anything to anyone | trying to hide that evil from you. As a matter of fact, | anyone trying to shelter that evil or sides with that evil | shares some of the guilt as well. They are just as evil as | the evil you wish to eradicate. So, once again, nothing is | off limits. | | Ridicule? Allowed. Lying to them? Allowed. Stealing from | them? Allowed. Torture? Allowed. Murder? Allowed. | | And if you're allowed to do these things and actually do | them, at what point are you not just a different flavor of | the same evil? What separates you from them? | | The only thing you needed to become your most depraved self | was an excuse. | | Some actions are wrong. And there are some lines we shouldn't | cross. No matter how evil you think someone is, that does not | justify certain actions. And some actions should only be | reserved for certain circumstances and those circumstances | never happen to be "I think he's evil". | fwip wrote: | Quoth dril, the scholar of our times: | | > the wise man bowed his head solemnly and spoke: "theres | actually zero difference between good & bad things. you | imbecile. you fucking moron" | | https://twitter.com/dril/status/473265809079693312 | the_lonely_road wrote: | Mother Teresa is likely to be a good example as long as you | believe she thought she was doing gods work and agree that | the details of how she did that are reprehensible. | AnimalMuppet wrote: | What is reprehensible about how she did what she did? | _jal wrote: | As with most things, Wikipedia will get you started: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Mother_Teresa | | A relevant quote from there summarizing some of them: | | "caring for the sick by glorifying their suffering | instead of relieving it, ... her questionable political | contacts, her suspicious management of the enormous sums | of money she received, and her overly dogmatic views | regarding, in particular, abortion, contraception, and | divorce". | AnimalMuppet wrote: | Her "overly dogmatic views regarding, in particular, | abortion, contraception, and divorce" are, I suspect, | orthodox Catholic doctrine. As for the rest, critics | criticize. She sure wasn't using the money she received | to get personally rich. She was working with/caring for | people that nobody else was. While less than perfect, I'm | not seeing "reprehensible" anywhere in the substance of | the criticism. | | (Read the "Responses to criticism" section of that | article for a decent explanation of why most of the | criticism is completely missing the point.) | coliveira wrote: | This is not the main point of the criticism. The issue is | that she raised millions in money that was not used for | her cause of taking care of suffering people in India. | Instead, the bulk of the money was sent to religious | causes and to the Vatican. | tarboreus wrote: | Think about the people who did the most evil things you can | think of. Were they really certain they were fighting evil? | Contrast with people who you think were admirable. Did they | think they were fighting evil? | | These are aphorisms, not essays. You either recognize (high- | level) wisdom in them, or you don't. | CoastalCoder wrote: | > These are aphorisms, not essays. | | That's a good observation. I agree that it's reasonable to | treat them as aphorisms. | | But even if we allow for a certain amount of hyperbole in | aphorisms, I would think there's some threshold of factual | accuracy that we want before accepting a given aphorism. | | That, and simple curiosity, are what motivated my original | question. | akomtu wrote: | "Combating" here likely means doing evil things in order to | combat other evil things. For example, the "Inferno" movie's | plot was to release a virus to downsize the population in order | to combat global warming. | dionidium wrote: | I think even that's too generous. It can also mean | misidentifying and mislabeling (or at the very least, | overreacting to) the causes of something one thinks is evil. | One might decide, for example, that the workers in early 20th | century Russia have been unfairly oppressed by the kulaks and | then, upon determining therefore that those kulaks meet a | standard for "evil," sleep soundly carrying out actions that | result in their mass enslavement and starvation (all in the | name of fighting oppression). | a3w wrote: | * A problem that can be solved with money is not really a | problem. | | I am broke and need X, which no one gives for free. Let's call X | education, because that and time might solve everything. Is that | not a problem worth calling so? | intergalplan wrote: | If we're being charitable, we could take "can" to include "you | can (reasonably) afford it", as in "YOU can solve the problem | with money", not "ONE could solve the problem with money, if | one had money". | | Given the tone of the rest of the piece, I'm not sure being | that charitable is warranted, though. I'm legitimately having a | hard time telling whether this list is presented seriously, or | as some kind of parody. | a1369209993 wrote: | > If we're being charitable | | Or, in the spirit of taking it as parody, that it's at least | a 'solved' problem[0] in the sense of the mathematician who | sees a fire, sees a fire extinguisher, says "Ah, a solution | exists!", and moves on. | | 0: where a solved (note lack of scare quotes) problem isn't | really a problem. | v64 wrote: | My takeaway from it is if the problem requires money to solve, | at least you are aware of the solution: money. It may be | difficult or impossible to achieve that end, but at least you | know it's the direction to go and can possibly make progress | toward solving. | | The worst kind of problem is one you can't see your way out of | and no option seems to exist to escape it. | scottlilly wrote: | The version of this I've always heard is, "Any problem that can | be solved by writing a check you can afford to write, is not | really a problem." | | So, if your car suddenly needs a $500 repair, and you have | $2500 in emergency savings, that's not a "problem". It's a | contingency you were prepared to handle. | msla wrote: | > It's a contingency you were prepared to handle. | | Which is a better way to phrase it: | | A contingency you were prepared to handle is not a problem. | | After all, a billionaire can still get lost at sea and die. | generalizations wrote: | The version I heard was, "be prepared". | cabaalis wrote: | If you can pay someone to do something, that thing you are | paying for is a problem which has already been solved by | someone, therefore not a problem. | coldtea wrote: | > _A problem that can be solved with money is not really a | problem._ | | He means money that you have and can spare. | bena wrote: | It's more about recognizing second order effects. | | If a problem can be solved with money, your real problem is not | having the money. | oh_sigh wrote: | > Jesus, Superman, and Mother Teresa never made art. Only | imperfect beings can make art because art begins in what is | broken. | | Spoken like someone who has never done even a cursory glance into | Mother Teresa. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-04-26 23:01 UTC)