[HN Gopher] Yayagram ___________________________________________________________________ Yayagram Author : paulhart Score : 700 points Date : 2021-04-29 15:18 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (twitter.com) (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com) | Grakel wrote: | I wonder if it's harder to voice-to-text your average Yaya. | nanna wrote: | This is cute but bearing in mind most of today's grandparents (at | least in the West) have had decades of using computers | professionally and at least a good few years using tablets and | smartphones, I really think the pitch should be directed | elsewhere. I especially don't think they would appreciate a | 'telegram' feature! | | Also, I know it's not meant literally, but its genderisation as | 'granny' is a really problematic cliche that I wish tech folk | would stop repeating. | nanna wrote: | Look, let me put this another way, since I'm being downvoted. | | I think my 70 year old mum, who is a grandma, would find it | patronising and sexist to have a device pitched to her as an | easier to use version of the iPad she is a bloody master of in | every way. She's far more adapt than my dad, bless him, but | even he can use WhatsApp and the like fine after being shown. | andrewzah wrote: | It's called that because they made it specifically for their | grandmother. Do we really need to state that it's going to | depend on the particular person and their needs? | | Also, that grandmother is _96_. That is not even remotely | close to someone in their ~70s. It is also dependent on the | person: one of my grandmothers (around 70) doesn't like | ipads, and can operate phones a little bit. My other grandma, | similar age, loves her ipad. | | You're being downvoted because you're treating this like a | generalized business pitch, when it's a specialized hardware | project someone did for their own grandmother, and gave it a | cute name based on their language. If I made something | specifically for my grandmother, I might include "bunica" in | the name. Seeing as that's what my whole family calls her, | and its a way to say grandmother in Romanian, which is a | gendered language. | | Also, I fail to see how the gender of the word for | grandmother here is relevant for the discussion. Grammatical | genders (also called noun classes) are not necessarily | related to human sexes, but I digress. | atleta wrote: | Actually, I wanted to say something very similar. And when | you said it was for his very specific _96_ year old | grandma, I went back and checked if I missed the obvious. | But a quick 2nd scan (and a search on the string 96) didn't | bring it up. I'm not saying you're wrong, indeed I'm pretty | sure you're right, but it's very-very far from obvious. | | Also, the initial tweet itself talks about the issue in | pretty generic terms: "a machine that helps our beloved | elders to keep communicating with their grandchildren ." | | My parents are around 80, and granted my father was an | engineer and my mother a _programmer_ they did have | exposure to computers from their 40 's and 50's. (Actually, | my mother started around the age of 30, but my father only | when he was 50.) Sure, another 15-20 years make a lot of | difference. | | However, plugging cables is more 1900's technology (reminds | me of the manual switchboards). I doubt too many people | alive today remember having to make a call like that as | opposed to dialling. They did use radios that had push | buttons and most of them for sure used ones with digital | tuning. So while it looks very retro, a simple turning knob | would have been a lot more sane. (Unless grandma used to be | a switchboard operator :) and still has good hand | coordination.) | | The other thing I don't get is the thermal printer. I mean | it's nice as a (very short term) archival device but an LCD | screen (or even and e-ink display) would make a lot more | sense. Of course, then you have to add scrolling (that | could be a tuning wheel-like thing or just up/down | buttons). Or well, maybe they would like to hear their | grandchildren :). | | But I digress: the point is that it was phrased pretty | generally and I also think it's very patronizing. (My | parents use skype, viber, email, fb chat as they did use | SMS and their mobiles.) While sure, there is value in | completely tailoring it to the needs of specific person. | Just don't think it's in general a good approach. | dang wrote: | Please don't post in the flamewar style to HN. If you're | answering a comment that you think is incorrect, do so in a | netural and/or friendly way. Otherwise you just make the | thread worse, no matter how right you are or feel you are. | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | nanna wrote: | Thanks for all your work, dang. | andrewzah wrote: | My apologies, will edit. | nanna wrote: | > you're treating this like a generalized business pitch, | when it's a specialized hardware project someone did for | their own grandmother, and gave it a cute name based on | their language. | | Ok, fair enough, I accept your argument. | fighterpilot wrote: | The device isn't being pitched to old people who know how to | use an iPad. It's being pitched to old people who don't. So | your mum has nothing to worry about. | notwhereyouare wrote: | you put an ipad in front of my 80 year old grandma and she'll | have NO idea how to use it. Even after training her and | walking her through using it multiple times. She just won't | remember. | | This device is basic and captures all the needs. I think the | only other cool feature would be a way to receive voice chats | back and play them to her | atleta wrote: | This is very far from being true as a generic statement. My | parents are around 80 and they are not the only ones of | this age I know who can use these devices pretty | efficiently. (They both have an android smart phone plus | they have a Linux laptop. They use these all the time. Oh, | and they watch content and listen to internet radio on | their Kodi running on a RasPi.) | | Of course _not all_ 80 year old will be able to use these | efficiently or, for that matter will like using them, but | that 's a different story. You can still make _those_ | easier to use (e.g. with a customized android skin /ui) or | build a thing that somewhat looks like an actual but | specialized computer. | mattowen_uk wrote: | I was about to say the same thing, but it seems you got flak | for it. Here in the UK, a large percentage of 70+ year olds | (my Father is 75) are totally au fait with mobile phones, | computers and tablets. In fact a lot of older folk have moved | to large tablets as it's easier to zoom the text and scroll | around for people their age. | | Maybe it's a country-by-country thing? | flobosg wrote: | FWIW, the author's grandmother is twenty-six years older than | your mother: | | https://twitter.com/mrcatacroquer/status/1386318879572570112 | | > My Yaya is Felisa Romano Martin, from Segovia, 96 years | old, and she is the best Yaya in the world. | fauria wrote: | That tweet goes along with an impressive picture of the | Alcazar de Segovia, a UNESCO World Heritage Site medieval | castle: https://www.eladelantado.com/wp- | content/uploads/2018/01/ALc%... [1] | | More info: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alc%C3%A1zar_of_Segovia | | [1] Source (Spanish): | https://www.eladelantado.com/segovia/la-imagen-segovia/ | [deleted] | roamingryan wrote: | I built out a simple "technology access" solution for my late | grandma about five years ago. It was just some simple scripts | running on a raspberry pi. The scripts would fetch emails from a | gmail account, extract the attachments, and display them on loop. | The subject line of the email, sender and the date were overlayed | on the image. | | The advantage over those IoT picture frame products was that I | could use any display I wanted. A cheap 32" TV was perfect. This | was key as her vision degraded. The approach also allowed anyone | in the family with email to send her photos, no proprietary apps | or accounts required. | | She passed away mid-Covid and I didn't get to see her in her | final 6 months, but she always bragged of her "picture machine." | I think she was the envy of many of her fellow nursing home | residents! | FredPret wrote: | I wish I could buy and ship this to my mom. Don't have the time | to set it up and she lives far away. | punnerud wrote: | I have bought this for my grandma that live on a senior home: | https://www.noisolation.com/global/komp | | Just one knob to turn it on and adjust the sound. | | My other grandma have an iPhone that she barely know how to | use (she still have the old one on the wall she love). I | first call her, than tell her to tap the green button if she | she want to use camera (switch to FaceTime). | | This works great for us to keep contact. | | Though both of this is solutions only allow us to initiate | the contact. Here the Yayagram is brilliant! | seniorivn wrote: | you can hire some local student to do the job, as long as you | know how it should be done, any tech savvy highschool/uni | student should do | dqpb wrote: | I want one. In fact I want there to be a whole line of quirky | hardware interfaces to do simple things that we usually use a | phone or computer for. They're fun and I think kids would love | them. | weasel_words wrote: | Agreed! Give it a killer steampunk look and you've got yourself | a win! | fudged71 wrote: | There was a kids "radio" project with a similar ethos posted a | couple weeks ago! | bradfitz wrote: | I built this for my ~1.5 year old who loves music: | https://twitter.com/bradfitz/status/1341470798825984001 .... | a Raspberry Pi keyboard (no screen) with stickers on the keys | that controls the Sonos. | SavantIdiot wrote: | Two interesting things about this project. | | 1. Just about 100% of the code already existed, it just needed to | be stuck together in a classy box. That's pretty damn cool: | there's no need to re-invent the wheel for some advanced | components, and it means more sophisticated ideas can be built | quickly. | | 2. This has been posted 11 times on HN and it finally went viral: | https://hn.algolia.com/?q=yayagram | zackbloom wrote: | I work on a company that is squarely targeted at the market of | people who don't have Internet. Nearly 10% of Americans don't | have Internet, the vast majority are older. During COVID, at | least in my family, it was pretty stark. My grandmother didn't | see a video of my nephews for essentially a year, as she was | quarantined and doesn't know how to use a smartphone or tablet. | She also doesn't have WiFi, so 'smart frames' and the like aren't | an option (nor is this device unfortunately). It's a real market | of real people. | tectonic wrote: | Are there LTE "dumb smart frames"? | zackbloom wrote: | Not to my knowledge. If anyone is interested in building one | get in touch, it would be a fun thing to build. Right now we | let people to mail videos [1]. Think a greeting card, but | which plays your home movies. | | [1] - https://sendheirloom.com | samjbobb wrote: | Hey this is cool! Looks like a great idea for an | underserved market, well executed. | re wrote: | I think it's amusing to imagine what the fifty-years-from-now | equivalent of this might look like. "I built a fake 'cell phone' | that lets my grandpa 'text' me, it translates the words into | thoughts and beams them directly to my neural implant." | JoeAltmaier wrote: | Probably be a web service that does that for you. Like those | old fax webservices. | kaspm wrote: | My bank sometimes requires me to "fax" documents to them | using a phone number. I download their electronic documents, | upload them to my esigning programing, esign them, then e-fax | them using the esigning program to their fax "number". I'm | sure on their end, they download the electronic "fax" and put | it directly into their document system. There is no paper at | any point in this process. | tfsh wrote: | I really appreciate the coverging of retro machines with modern | APIs. I've been working on a smart home solution (automated | blinds, etc), I really want to build a control panel with lots of | physical switches like the Yayagram now | coolspot wrote: | See also: ad-free smart TV for elders - | https://m.habr.com/ru/post/511060/ | dang wrote: | Does anybody work on translating the best habr.com articles | into English? | andreygrehov wrote: | I used to do it. You might remember there was a project | called kukuruku.co - quite a lot of submissions from that | domain were on the front page of HN. But, it was super hard | for me to monetize the project, so I abandoned it. Fun fact: | the founder of Habr wanted to buy the project from me, but I | declined his offer. | sdflhasjd wrote: | When I'm asked to find some phone or other technology for an | elderly relative, I'm always concerned about the usability of | devices. | | A lot of companies and people don't realy appreciate how much | training is really needed to operate even the simplest of mobile | phones. | | I've not really seen any solutions other than making buttons | bigger and reducing menu options, I'm sure these are great for | those with deteriorating eyesight, but they aren't really | offering anything for a person who has never used a smartphone | before. | | The real solution has to be usable by someone who has never | operated _any_ modern technology - It has to be so simple you | could maybe even train a dog to use. | | An idea of mine is to have a bank of "walkie talkies" - one for | each person you wish to speak to. | | And this problem is always growing; my parents haven't retired | yet, but even they are struggling to use today's on-demand | television. What will happen when digital terrestrial TV is shut | down and they have to learn to use whatever new interface is on | the successor to the inevitably cancelled Android TV. | lacker wrote: | _A lot of companies and people don 't really appreciate how | much training is really needed to operate even the simplest of | mobile phones._ | | I completely agree, but at the same time it's funny that you | can take a two-year-old without any formal technology training | at all, accidentally leave an iPad where they can get it, and | before long they're showing you gesture commands you didn't | even know about. | crusty wrote: | My experience with this differential leads me to believe the | train stems largely from caution and expectations. | | A small child has zero degree of caution. An older person | knows they don't know and worries that ignorance will somehow | break the device (permanently or temporarily). | | A small child usually doesn't have a formal expectation of | what they are trying to achieve, it's largely | experimentation, maybe with the intent to discover fun or | find games, but it's pretty basic. An older person often will | have a very specific y'all they would like to accomplish | while being aware they aren't totally sure the device can do | it, and if it can, how exactly to get the device to do it. | | I think these two inputs create a feedback loop that works to | promote technology acquisition in children and retard it | among older people. | asoneth wrote: | > A small child has zero degree of caution. | | As a parent of small children I regularly have to repair | electronic devices that have been temporarily broken (e.g. | different languages set, screens locked out, tablet storage | filled by thousands of burst photos of the floor) and a | small but growing collection of electronic devices that | have been permanently broken (e.g. antennas pulled off of | radios, keys pulled off keyboards, ports yanked out) by | this lack of caution. | | > An older person knows they don't know and worries that | ignorance will somehow break the device (permanently or | temporarily). | | This may be rational learned behavior. If they don't have | someone on hand to fix issues then with many interfaces | it's surprisingly easy to get yourself stuck in a situation | where it's not obvious how to get out. | grok22 wrote: | Yeah, this is something I too struggle to understand. A kid | new to it quickly gets the basics of an iPad. But a grandma | struggles with it. Maybe all their preconceived notions cause | a mental barrier for some older folks in adopting new | technology? Maybe it's just that people are variable in their | adaptability and there probably will be kids too who find | using an iPad really hard. | JadeNB wrote: | I made a sister comment slightly after yours | (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26983932), but I | think it's also worth noting that the two-year-old probably | comes to the iPad with the idea of playing with it and | seeing what happens. It's easy to make _something_ happen | on an iPad, and the two-year-old is delighted by most of | the responses. | | By contrast, someone older but less experienced to | technology comes to the iPad with a specific goal in mind. | Unlike toddlers, whose whole mission in life is to form an | image of what to them is a uniformly mysterious world, | these are smart people who don't want to have to learn a | whole new paradigm to do one thing. Not only can they not | do the thing they want; worse, the motion and lights that | accompany their attempts are not delighting to them as to | the two-year-old, but somewhere between distracting and | unpleasant. | nerdponx wrote: | _Maybe all their preconceived notions cause a mental | barrier for some older folks in adopting new technology?_ | | I've observed this as well. The hardest part are the basic | concepts. Examples: | | - The idea of a "settings menu" itself is somewhat of an | alien concept and mostly limited to devices with screens. | | - Not all UI elements have obvious meanings if you aren't | already used to them. | | - The input device itself might be unfamiliar (mouse, | keyboard, touchscreen) and the user's brain might be busy | trying to understand how to interact with the device at | all, let alone do useful things with it. | | - Some users never learned the "why" or even the "what" of | existing devices, only the "how" -- they don't understand | concepts like "applications", they just follow very | specific steps that someone laid out for accomplishing | specific tasks. This makes it very difficult to discover | functionality or adapt to a different UI, because they | don't know what anything actually is in the first place. | Leherenn wrote: | I don't know, a common issue I have seen is pointing the | camera towards their face during a video call. These are | people that have been taking pictures with regular | cameras for decades, but give them a smartphone and they | can't target their face to save their lives. They're not | stupid, and I don't think it's a new concept, it's just | digital instead of analogic. But a lot of older people | struggle, I don't understand. | frereubu wrote: | A regular camera has one function - to take photos of | what it's pointing at. Phone cameras are often hidden in | the screen of a device that does a huge number of | different things. | JadeNB wrote: | Two-year olds have a lot less experience with how the world | works, and so both have less to unlearn, and more patience to | try lots of things that don't work until they find the one | thing that works. | ISL wrote: | The biggest problem we have faced, unfortunately, is the | proliferation of modern security features. | | Chromebooks are _awesome_ in many ways for the elderly, but the | fact that you can 't disable password entry at startup has been | a dealbreaker for my aging father. He can't type easily and is | beginning to struggle with passwords. | | Paradoxically, this means that he's still running his Ubuntu | laptop (he has been using UNIX systems since a DEC Alpha) but | getting left behind on a lot of accessibility features and has | minimal support from nursing-home staff. | | Struggling with passwords has also meant that he is endlessly | resetting passwords or creating new accounts, compounding | confusion. | | It is a tricky set of problems, with no easy answers. | nicoburns wrote: | You might want to try him with a password manager. | boatsie wrote: | It seems tempting to solve technological problems with more | technology, but my experience is more technology is more | problems. The password manager will update/ask for updates. | It will ask about auto fill or saving passwords, etc. The | people with password understanding problems definitely | don't understand password management problems! | frereubu wrote: | 1Password has worked well for my 90-year-old mother. I | disabled the "ask to save password" option. If she needs | a new account on something - which doesn't happen very | often - I just use Screen Sharing (we both have Macs) and | set it up for her. I also have her 1Password account | syncing to mine. Although I do still get support phone | calls when there's a glitch, it's worked out very well on | balance, compared to the amount of support she needed | before with account setup and not using the same password | _everywhere_. | nicoburns wrote: | Syncing the passwords to your own computer so that you | can set them up is a genius idea. | kawzeg wrote: | I know this idea is a little ridiculous, but it just popped | into my head: what about using one of those rubber ducky USB | keys that pretend they're a keyboard and enter certain | keystrokes? You could have it enter the password when | inserted. | | Or, perhaps a physical password manager that can store | multiple passwords, with a labeled button for each? | ad404b8a372f2b9 wrote: | I have the same problem with my parents and I initially | thought the Windows 10 pin screen was quite good for this. | You only need 4 numbers, I set it to my birthdate and it's | made things somewhat easier for them. | | That was until my mom phoned me telling me her keyboard was | broken. Took me a while to diagnose that she was trying to | enter letters into the pin-field and it gave no indication | that you weren't supposed to do that, it just didn't input | any characters. | | Also turns out the Windows account metaphor has gotten really | confusing since they introduced microsoft accounts that are | both local and online but don't necessarily share the same | characteristics and now you have like 3 different passwords | for the single "account" concept. | mtrovo wrote: | I don't know which brand you looked at but I'm pretty sure | Chromebooks support fingerprint login for some time now | (check this HP support page for ChromeOS for instance [0]). | | But I agree with the overall tone of what you're saying and I | have the same kind of problem with my parents. I think the | movement away from common protocols just made it worse, | before you could have a simplified client just for the | elderly or any other "niche" group and it would work, now if | you do something like this for Whatsapp or Instagram you | would probably receive a cease and desist letter. | | [0] https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/c06917763 | wanderingstan wrote: | FWIW, fingerprint login has never worked for my elderly | parents. The combination of drier skin, shaky fingers, and | poorer sense of pressure means they could never get it | quite right. (And on iPhone, always ended up pressing the | home button.) | | I've noticed in the last decade that my fingers too have | less oil and I sometimes have to wet my finger. | abraae wrote: | There are so many beautiful UI hints with this. | | 1) The shape of the microphone positively urges the user to lean | forward and talk into it. Compare to a modern smartphone where | it's not at all obvious where the microphone is. | | 2) The giant red button next to the microphone positively scream | "press me to talk", and it's obvious that the red LED will light | up when the button is pressed. Removes any "is this thing on"? | thoughts. | | 3) The patch panel is quite genius, it's obvious how to target | the desired recipient. One might quibble with the plug systenm, | but using the large style plugs is a great choice for unsteady | hands. These plugs have more leeway if not plugged all the way in | than micro style plugs. | | 4) The recipients are all in a line, and due to the design, one | of them is always selected. That removes any "did I select | someone", sa I sometimes experience when sharing on my phone to | some social network. | | 5) What's more, the last selected recipient is persistent, even | in the event of a power cut. | | 6) Thermal printer is genius. Yaya can tear off important | messages and carry them with her. | cellularmitosis wrote: | > These plugs have more leeway if not plugged all the way in | than micro style plugs | | Oh, that's a great point! You could route a simple on/off | signal across only the sleeve, and not even use the tip at all. | Even if it were only half-way inserted, it would still work. | | Edit: looking more closely at the photos, it appears that's | exactly what he's doing, neat! | randomdrake wrote: | For folks interested in technology that helps to keep our less- | technological relatives connected, I highly recommend | NanaGram[0]. | | I've been a paid user since the early days and it's an absolute | delight to my grandmother every single time it shows up during | the month. | | 1. Register and get a unique phone number to text | | 2. Start sending photos to that number via SMS | | 3. Share the phone number with other relatives and tell them to | do the same | | 4. Grandparent gets envelope of printed photos just like the ones | filling their old albums on the shelves | | It really is that easy. It's affordable. And the founder is very | responsive to any support inquiries. | | It was a service I always wanted to build myself but never had | the time. I'm very grateful for it. | | [0] - https://nanagram.co/ | throwaway823882 wrote: | Yaya: "Oh what the hell has this crazy kid made now..." | ALittleLight wrote: | My thoughts are that the font should be larger for the names and | and for the text output. Ideally include pictures next to the | names, so even if it's hard to read, it would be easy to spot who | you want to connect to. I didn't see it, but you also probably | need a notification to reload the paper roll as you come to the | end. This could be a warning LED and it could also be a warning | text sent to some or all of the people on the other end of the | YAYAGRAM that Yaya is running low on paper, can you help her | reload? | roughly wrote: | This is such a beautiful project! | khazhoux wrote: | I only wish it weren't named Yaya, as I hate promoting the idea | that old women are the pinnacle of technological ineptness. I | know that wasn't the intent, but still. It's unfortunately a | common expression to say "This product is so easy, even your | grandmother can use it!" As if the only group more incompetent | than old people, is old _women_ (or, if you prefer, the only | group more incompetent than women are old women). | | I really think it's time to consciously move away from this | outdated meme. | Ashanmaril wrote: | "Gram" also means grandma. The full English translation of this | name is "Gramgram" | sethammons wrote: | > Gramgram | | which also means grandma :) | throwaway316943 wrote: | Gramagram would be another good name for this device | SavantIdiot wrote: | Agreed. The "even a mom can do it" is broken on so many levels. | There's a documentary about the developers of Mozilla, and one | of them makes a comment while golfing (I think) in response to | this cliche. He says, "My mother writes optimizing compilers." | Can't remember the film or the person, but they were wearing | launch t-shirts that read "zaro boogs" (zero bugs) still sticks | in my head. | | EDIT: Pretty sure it was "Code Rush", 2000. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_Rush | jwatt wrote: | That's in Code Rush: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q7FTjhvZ7Y&t=656s | golemiprague wrote: | In many cases it is true though, men are more technologically | inclined and younger people have better cognitive skills and it | is not going to change even if you force the whole population | to say every morning that men and women are exactly the same or | young and old are exactly the same | bozzcl wrote: | If you know that wasn't the intent, why make this complaint at | all? | khazhoux wrote: | When people use the expression "So simple even your | grandmother will understand it" I don't think they are trying | to insult anyone. But... it _is_ an insult, whether it was | meant that way or not. | gordian-mind wrote: | This type of bland complaint is just a common way nowadays to | signal that you are part of the In-group, that _cares_ about | people. | khazhoux wrote: | I can assure you that I am not luxuriating in the benefits | and privileges of this fabled "In-group", and that I'm only | trying to draw attention to the fact that the common | expression "So simple even your grandmother will understand | it" is demeaning to both women and old people. Clearly you | don't care about that, so there's little for us to discuss. | frereubu wrote: | I get what you're saying, but it's a one-off thing that the guy | built especially _for_ his Yaya. | khazhoux wrote: | Totally get that. My point is that "Even your grandmother can | use it" is still a common saying, combining both sexism and | agism, and we should stop promoting that notion. | | To illustrate this, if it was this guy's uncle who was | techno-challenged and he named it "Unclegram", probably most | people would be scratching their heads. But we see Yayagram | and it "makes sense"... because _of course grandmothers | struggle with technology!_ See the problem? | frereubu wrote: | Absolutely. I'm very sensitive to that kind of thing | because I have a 90-year-old mother who I hate people | writing off like that. But unless I missed it he doesn't | say "Even your grandmother can use it" in his thread does | he? I just feel like you're picking the wrong item to hang | this argument from. | khazhoux wrote: | The inventor was not generalizing, but when it starts | moving from his one-off to a product idea (as lots of | folks are asking for him to productize it) that where my | argument comes in. Most likely this won't be a real | product anyway, so I suppose I'm just trying to draw | attention to this meme that does happen a lot. | abraae wrote: | You realise that (typically) an uncle would be one | generation younger and thus have decades more exposure to | technology, hence "so simple my uncle could use it" doesn't | really work. | | It's hard to hide from the fact that seniors are more | likely to struggle with technology. You can't sweep that | under a politically correct rug. And if we did, people | would be less likely to make things like this, because no- | one could talk about them. | chrisweekly wrote: | This is so great. I'm really moved by the author's empathy and | love. Those of you who are lucky enough to still have | grandparents (or parents for that matter), please take | inspiration to connect with them while you still can. Life is | short, and nothing in the world can take the place of family. | falcolas wrote: | I firmly believe there is a market for this. Please, someone, | make it a commercial reality. | newsclues wrote: | I think it needs a scanner to turn letters into txt/email | falcolas wrote: | Even a camera on the edge could work pretty well with the | right image transformations. | | A printer driver, that could optionally print "the last photo | received" to an inkjet printer, would be another great | addition for a doting grandparent. | smnrchrds wrote: | Is there a way to create something like this for video calls? An | always-on device that can make calls through Skype or similar? Or | are the protocols too closed and apps too unavailable to make it | possible. | layer8 wrote: | You could probably use an iPad in kiosk mode (single app always | shown) mounted with an always-connected charger. | fudged71 wrote: | There have been more than one startup with the idea that an | iPad should sit on your wall as a window into another | person's house. | wikibob wrote: | Alexa devices have auto answer mode | spookyuser wrote: | This is incredible, I wish there were more analogue centered | devices for older people with both hearing and vision loss. The | combination makes it virtually impossible to interact with any | well designed software because it's all touch screen and way too | complicated. But also makes it impossible to interact with the | limited number of phones with analogue buttons because they are | usually feature phones with even worse designed software than | touchscreen phones and at that point the analogue buttons don't | really help at all. So yeah this is truly incredible. | thirdlamp wrote: | On top of the points others in this thread have made, I think | this is also a lesson for UX designers. It's really obvious how | the Yayagram works and how to use it and this is how our UX | should be. | musingsole wrote: | NUIs: iNuitive User Interfaces used to be (perhaps still is) an | interesting design philosophy in the UX space. The goal being | to build a system that a brand new user fresh off the boat | could walk up to and intuit what the system could do and how to | manipulate the system to solve their problems. Though this is | complicated by our thought patterns and habits being altered by | just interacting with computer systems. So, it becomes hard to | pinpoint exactly what "intuitive" means to an audience as wide | as the entire population or even small groups like "university | students". | | Thinking this way becomes incredibly important as systems move | from dedicated devices further into coordinated actions of | ubiquitous devices. | hervature wrote: | Does NUI not stand for Natural User Interface? iNtuitive is | definitely Non-intuitive. | goldenchrome wrote: | As a former UX designer, this is a wonderful device and I love | it. It was clearly made with a particular user in mind and they | thoughtfully designed around the user constraints. | | It's effective because it's as simple as possible, and relies | heavily (as pointed out by the designer multiple times) on very | old metaphors like switchboards, telegrams, and binary state | indicator lights. It feels obvious because these metaphors have | been in our lives for decades, so we're very familiar with | them. But it doesn't mean that we didn't have to learn them at | one point. It's sort of like how the Beatles sound like regular | music today, but in their heyday they made very new sounds and | lots of people thought it was shit music. | | I feel like UX designers are devalued because they often seem | to create irritation rather than harmony. Let me tell you, it's | a real pain in the ass making harmonious experiences when | you're playing second fiddle to short term business goals, or | even third fiddle to short term engineering constraints. I | would love to go into Gmail and declare it a finished product | and get the whole team to spend a year figuring out which | features we can strip out to simplify the product and design it | holistically like this Yayagram, but it's a terrible business | decision so we're not doing it. | | In real life, UX designers are there simply to prevent large | apps from devolving into CRUD hell, and it's nearly Sisyphean. | sevencolors wrote: | Yeah i feel like a new UX idea isn't fully appreciated till | many years later when they're widely accepted | paxys wrote: | What's the lesson here? Yes this is a simple UI, but if put | next to an iPhone which one will a billion+ people pick? | operator-name wrote: | Although the iPhone is a more popular device it doesn't fill | the accessability needs of all users. Just as many countries | have disabilities acts for manufacturing and civil | engineering, shouldn't technology and platforms have | something similar? | kall wrote: | I absolutely love it but is it really obvious how the jack | connection thing works? I would imagine only to former | switchboard operators and modular synthesizer players. | psadri wrote: | The cable could be replaced with a rotary switch with stops | for each recipient. I'd also add a picture of each grandchild | in addition to the name. But overall, this is an awesome idea | :-) | bredren wrote: | I could see this, maybe each time the dial settles into its | little ka-thunk index might also play "hello grandma" in | the grandchild's voice. | nojs wrote: | This is amazing. I can think of several relatives who would | absolutely love something like this over struggling with a | touchscreen. | bozzcl wrote: | Sometimes, the fact that my parents and grandmother are so good | with technology disappoints me because I have fewer chances of | building cool stuff like this. | aimor wrote: | This is really neat. It has me thinking about my own grandma who | loves getting pictures on her phone, but is that the best | interface for her? What if I could send pictures and they'd | automatically print out, I think she'd like that even more. I | think it's funny because that's a pretty easy thing to set up, | but I never considered it until now. | throwaway316943 wrote: | Combine this with the email based picture display and you're | set. Just an rPi and an inkjet. | reaperducer wrote: | _What if I could send pictures and they 'd automatically print | out_ | | I did that for my mother with a surplus Powerbook and an inkjet | printer. I'd just VNC in and print out the picture. | | Worked great for a while. Then one day she dumped a cup of | coffee into the keyboard. "Oh, it's no big deal. I'm sure you | do it all the time," she said. End of pictures. | selljamhere wrote: | This is brilliant. It can help connect an entire generation that | might otherwise be "left behind" in a thoughtful and meaningful | way. | grok22 wrote: | Something like this needs to be made commercial at a reasonable | price-point :-(. It will help bridge the technology gap between | aged grand-parents who aren't comfortable with modern tech and | up-to-date grand-kids who live in far-flung places and are more | comfortable with the newer methods of communication. Also | connecting to a network must be made transparent somehow in these | devices like Kindle's WhisperNet. | zackbloom wrote: | I would say the single biggest issue right now is the cost of | an LTE modem and service. Cursory research shows a fully | integrated modem is on the order of $44 at small quantities. | Obviously cell phone manufactures get that number way down but | they also manufacture at very high quantities. | | It looks like service is on the order of $0.50 per month per | device, plus $0.33 per MB. That's not prohibitive, but it would | mean the device would likely have to have a subscription of at | least $19 a month. | anxrn wrote: | Is LTE necessary? It seems that 3G or even 2G might suffice, | and might be cheaper? | lotsofpulp wrote: | I would assume those networks will be shut down sooner | rather than later in most places. I think 2G already is | gone in the US. | ape4 wrote: | Is there a video of a gramma using it? | Thorentis wrote: | This is brilliant. A single device that does one thing, and does | it (hopefully) really well. It is a much needed antidote to the | "all in one" apps we are seeing more and more of. | | Touchscreens really embody the "all in one" design pattern, and | lend themselves to those types of apps. That's after all what | they're intended for: interchangeable interfaces. Nice to see a | modern service being used with an analog interface. | chobytes wrote: | Bothers me to no end how many once simple devices have gone | this way. I feel like I would be willing to pay more for | simpler appliances at this point. | jdgoesmarching wrote: | Touchscreens and tiny computers are cheap and getting | cheaper. It's easier than manufacturing specific components | for "simpler" devices. I just wish companies would stop | pretending like it's an advanced feature rather than a cost- | cutting measure. | donw wrote: | Oh, god, this. Specifically simple appliances that are | designed to be _repaired_. | everfraid wrote: | This is why I really enjoy the Kindle I just bought. A single | use: reading books. | capableweb wrote: | Doesn't the Kindle have a browser too? If you'd like to pay | mess and be able to do even less, you can try reMarkable. | spoonjim wrote: | Kindle browser is so shitty that nobody would use it. | calmoo wrote: | The kindle browser is so unusable that you wouldn't even be | bothered with it. | donw wrote: | The Kindle browser is designed to encourage you to give up | on the Web and read more books. | chris_engel wrote: | This is the reason why I like Telegram so much more than | WhatsApp. The fact theres an API and the possibility to write | bots makes all the difference. | zingplex wrote: | The use of an XLR cord is a stroke of genius. Having the state of | the machine clearly visible and manipulatable by people with fine | motor problems solves 90% of the problems I encounter when | volunteering with the elderly. | [deleted] | mdtusz wrote: | It appears to be using an 1/4" patch cord, not an XLR cable! | XLR is the cable (and connector) with 3 pins as is used with | microphones and carries a balanced signal - 1 leg is ground, | then the other two are inverted signals to minimize noise. | zingplex wrote: | Yeah, you're right. My brain made the association between XLR | and generic audio cables without thinking. | Naracion wrote: | A single 3 pin XLR will only carry balanced signal for a | single channel (which this might as well be). For stereo you | either need two 3 pin XLR (as is the case for interconnects | in high end or pro audio) or a single 4 pin XLR (as is found | in high end headphones). | | The way it works is so simple yet genius. Say the main signal | is +x. Then one of the pins will carry -x. At the end, the | receiving end will invert -x and add the two signals | together. This gives x + -(-x) = 2x. So it gives twice the | power. Great. So what? | | Well, if you introduce noise into the chain, it gets canceled | out! Pin 1: X + noise Pin 2: -X + noise | | Final = pin1-pin2 = X+noise + X-noise = 2X | | Brilliant. | OJFord wrote: | Brilliant yes, but lest anyone think it's XLR-specific: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_signaling | | I assume it's also the reason for 'bi-wire' speakers, while | we're on audio gear. | devoutsalsa wrote: | Back in the 2000s, my mother & grandmother communicated via fax | because grandma didn't have a computer. This makes sense to me! | 1970-01-01 wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleprinter#Obsolescence_of_te... | kenorb wrote: | Congrats on your project, looks promising! Thanks for using tg | fork. If you've any new changes, feel free to send PRs. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-04-29 23:00 UTC)