[HN Gopher] What3Words - The Algorithm ___________________________________________________________________ What3Words - The Algorithm Author : ykat7 Score : 213 points Date : 2021-05-02 13:19 UTC (9 hours ago) (HTM) web link (cybergibbons.com) (TXT) w3m dump (cybergibbons.com) | Andrew_nenakhov wrote: | I used to think that w3w is kinda neat and really liked them, but | then I've learned that they basically stole the idea from some | guy from India, and their predatory copyrastic practices. | jonnycomputer wrote: | I think I'm missing something. The algorithm shuffles to prevent | words in adjacent squares from being the same? Why not just draw | from the set of 3-permutations and if satisfies that adjacency | constraint, remove from the pool of available permutations | (conditional draw without replacement). A solution would only | have to be found once anyway, right? | jasonwatkinspdx wrote: | Their business model is to own access to the dataset. They | don't want hierarchy as they want people to be required to use | their software every time they interact with these addresses. | They're just scummy. There's no reason to use this scheme vs a | hierarchical decomposition using something like S2. | ZiiS wrote: | Storing a full lookup database on every device is not pratical. | qsort wrote: | With ~3 million squares it would fit in a couple hundred | megabytes at the very most, even without any compression. It | may not be optimal, but it's certainly not unrealistic | either. | bspammer wrote: | The squares are 9m^2, surface area of the earth is 510 | trillion m^2, so there's about 50 trillion squares. You're | not fitting that in an app | jonnycomputer wrote: | I think the surface area of the earth is 196,936,994 m^2 | That's 21,881,888 3x3 squares. The surface area of | Jupiter is 23 trillion m^2. | cybergibbons wrote: | Your surface area is totally incorrect. | noir_lord wrote: | It is 510.1 trillion m2 (google result). | | 3x3 is 510.1/9 - 56 trillion (and change). | | > 196,936,994 m^2 | | Is equivalent to a perfect square with sides 14km | long...they say it's a small world..but not that small. | jonnycomputer wrote: | Again, I think I'm missing something. Apps don't maintain a | complete local database or resource records for the domain | name system either. We access name-servers for that | information. So I think I'm missing the use case for this | system. | cybergibbons wrote: | A design requirement of the app is it works offline. | simonw wrote: | What an extraordinary piece of analysis. Really thorough, | detailed and well-explained work. | [deleted] | kybernetikos wrote: | I did a words lat/long system as a couple day project at | Christmas. https://wherewords.id/ | | I used the google S2 mapping, and spent quite a bit of time on my | own wordlist. I like the S2 mapping - it lets you use fewer words | to refer to a bigger area. I write a little bit about it here: | https://wherewords.id/+about | | I would have really liked to have found some good research on | 'words that are hard to mistake when spoken aloud across various | accents', but in the end I just spent ages going through my word | list with various libraries and manually. And having friends | point me to locations that had incredibly rude or offensive | wherewords! | | Really there should be a free, open source word<->location system | that we all just standardise on and build into GPS systems and | maps, because a common, free system would be genuinely useful. | rozab wrote: | How many times has the wheel been reinvented with these | phonetic word list schemes? Loads of crypto apps use them, e.g. | for bitcoin wallet recovery. Do they all roll their own scheme? | Someone should attempt to make a standard if none exists. | | Interoperability isn't even that important, I just want to pull | something into my project. | kybernetikos wrote: | I originally planned to use the crypto bip39 wordlist but | ultimately it proved not to be suitable. I talk a little | about it https://wherewords.id/+about | rozab wrote: | Great summary, thanks | snypher wrote: | Crypto wallets may use BIP39 protocol, it might be close to a | 'standard'? | | https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0039.mediawi. | .. | | Edit: 2048 English wordlist is here https://github.com/bitcoi | n/bips/blob/master/bip-0039/english... | ryebit wrote: | In addition to BIP39 cited below, the EFF also published some | useful wordlists a few years ago... | https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/07/new-wordlists- | random-p... | | One has the nice property that all words have unique 3 letter | prefix. But not as many in prefix list (1296) as their "long" | list (7776). | | That said I'm kinda partial to BIP39... first four letters | are unique, and words are more uniform than EFF prefix list. | | But it looks like GPS addressing schemes like w3w need a MUCH | larger list by an order of magnitude. | kybernetikos wrote: | > But it looks like GPS addressing schemes like w3w need a | MUCH larger list by an order of magnitude. | | If you're trying to get down to 3 words yes, but if you're | happy with 4 words (and I am), then the long list would be | more than enough. One problem I found was that I think | people don't want strongly negative phrases being used to | describe where they live. The BIP39 wordlist can create | word groups that are very offensive, or that would feel | rascist if applied to particular parts of the world. It | also has words that are easily confused for other words | like alter, aisle. | | I did use words from BIP39, but had to remove quite a few | in the end for my wordlist (e.g. blast, load, black, | finger, female etc.) because of the unfortunate clusters it | could create. | | Ultimately, I think coming up with a good wordlist is still | a bit of an unsolved problem. The ideal wordlist for | something like this | | 1. can't form obviously rascist or overtly sexual word | clusters | | 2. can be easily distinguished in spoken communication | | 3. can be easily distinguished in written communication | | 4. doesn't have words that sound similar to other words in | any of the most common accents | | 5. doesn't have geographic words (it'd be confusing) | | 6. is mainly positive or neutral words | | 7. consists of words that are easy to spell, avoiding words | that are commonly misspelled and where there are not | different standard ways of spelling the words depending on | region | | 8. has words that are not too long | | 9. doesn't contain words that are concatenations of other | words in the wordlist | | Obviously not easy if you need a significant number of | them. | micheljansen wrote: | I learned about pluscodes because of this and they seem quite | elegant: https://maps.google.com/pluscodes/ | ehsankia wrote: | The algorithm is also extremely simple, I've seen code golf | with less than 100 char in most languages, and realistically | just a couple lines of code. | | I like that you can recursively add more precision after the | plus, as well as truncate some of the start if you provide | context like the country or city. For example all of Montreal | lives within the "87Q8" block, so I can just truncate that away | if I specify that I'm in Montreal. | wyager wrote: | Doesn't the plus code algorithm rely on tiling the globe with | a space filling curve? I'd be surprised if that could be done | simply. | CA0DA wrote: | pluscodes are also known as "Open Location Code" and the github | repo is: https://github.com/google/open-location-code | rdpintqogeogsaa wrote: | Going by other people's experience with them[0], I wonder how | long this post will stay up. | | [0] https://twitter.com/AaronToponce/status/1387933438305394690 | boramalper wrote: | For future reference, | https://web.archive.org/web/20210502132217/https://cybergibb... | detaro wrote: | Given that cybergibbons has spent the past weeks looking into | this very loudly and publicly, don't expect him to back down. | ykat7 wrote: | Aaron posted an update. As of an hour ago they "consider the | matter closed": | https://twitter.com/AaronToponce/status/1388828107407245312 | [deleted] | dmitrykoval wrote: | Story by TC - https://techcrunch.com/2021/04/30/what3words- | legal-threat-wh... | maxerickson wrote: | The cat may be far enough out of the bag at this point. | pmoriarty wrote: | Here [1] is the same thread on nitter (a twitter alternative | that does not require Javascript to read). Other nitter | instances can be seen here: [2] | | The twitter thread also contained a reference to this | interesting article on "Why bother with What Three Words?"[3], | which itself links to other interesting articles: | [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] | | W3W is a neat core idea poorly thought through. Hopefully one | day there'll be a truly open alternative that solves the many | issues W3W itself has. | | [1] - https://nitter.cc/AaronToponce/status/1387933438305394690 | | [2] - https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/wiki/Instances | | [3] - https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2019/03/why-bother-with-what- | three-... | | [4] - https://blog.ldodds.com/2016/06/14/what-3-words-jog-on- | mate/ | | [5] - https://knowwhereconsulting.co.uk/blog/location-grid-not- | an-... | | [6] - https://medium.com/@piesse/open-location-code- | what3words-74a... | | [7] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18646650 | | [8] - https://www.quora.com/What-is-your-review-of-what3words | | [9] - https://stiobhart.net/2016-01-15-stupidest-idea-ever/ | | [10] - http://blog.telemapics.com/?p=589 | | [11] - | https://www.grcdi.nl/Address_encoding_versus_traditional_add... | | [12] - https://www.grcdi.nl/linkspas.htm | CA0DA wrote: | check out Open Location Code (https://github.com/google/open- | location-code) (aka PlusCodes) | jedimastert wrote: | I'm baffled they used any plurals at all. I feel like "only one | form of a word" should have been near top priority for generating | the dictionary. No plurals, no conjugations (even better would be | to pick one conjugation, say, infinitive) maybe even no | adjective/adverb forms of verb. | | I wonder how many words in the english language would be left? I | know the english language is massive | cybergibbons wrote: | The word list already is 40k long. That's beyond most people's | vocab and includes really awkward to spell words. | | IMO, if the solution is to use words, then What4Words would | have had a word list of less than 3000, resulting in a word | list with less confusable words and more accessible to children | and people who struggle to read or write. | pmoriarty wrote: | Spelling is the Achilles' heel of all word-based systems. | | People who have trouble with spelling (such as non-native | speakers of whatever language the words come from or | children) may not be able to rely on word-based systems. | Word-based systems are also going to be hampered by speakers | of different accents. | | Letter- and number-based systems are probably always going to | be much more robust, especially when used with a standard | phonetic alphabet[1]. There could even be a checksum | letter/number to make the system even more robust. | Unfortunately, such systems will never be as memorable or as | easy to say as a few words (spelling issues aside). | | [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_phonetic_alphabet | flir wrote: | > Spelling is the Achilles' heel of all word-based systems. | | Stick with nouns? Then you can use icons as supplements. | Ball, Pen, Light bulb, Burger, Guitar. | | Possibly easier to translate between languages, too. | pmoriarty wrote: | How do you spell "guitar"? | | It's not spelled like it sounds, and not every English | speaker (never mind people who can't speak English) is | going to know how to spell it. Some may try to spell it | "gitar", "geetar" or even "getar", for example. While | these maybe be "obviously" wrong spelling for skilled | spellers, they're not so for everyone. | | Even with a simple word like "ball", it's not obvious | that it should have two l's at the end. Someone might | spell it "bal" when they hear it. | | Spelling reform[1] movements have pointed out these and | many other issues with English spelling, but | unfortunately the alternatives they've come up with are | just not widely known, and at least some of them still | have their own problems (such as lack of standardization | due to different phonemic spellings for words spoken by | people with different accents). | | Even were there some magical alternate spelling system | for English that was widely known among English speakers, | it would still be a stumbling block for people who don't | know English, as would the words of any other language.. | as long as there are people who don't speak that | language. | | So any word-based system is going to be problematic and | error-prone for some people. | | [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spelling_reform | cortesoft wrote: | We should clearly use Esperanto words. | jameshart wrote: | Ah yes, simple phonetic words like 'light' and | 'guitar'... | jeroenhd wrote: | Spelling is very much an underappreciated problem. Written | English is particularly bad, sometimes requiring | memorization that's not much unlike Chinese characters, | because of the written language not adapting to the vowel | shifts and changes in pronunciation, as well as the mess of | a history the language has gone through as it developed in | the UK. | | Children, dyslexics, non-native speakers, all will have a | hard time writing down many words even if they're part of | the top 1000 list. | | With the right word set (avoiding homophones) and the | presence of autocorrect (or an input only allowing the | limited word list), you could probably create a pretty | resilient system if you only take the most common words | (top 1k would likely be sufficient). You'll need a longer | address, but remembering six words is a lot easier than | remembering six letters. | | Sadly, the entire concept is flawed and doomed for as long | as the goons of What Three Words operate their business | like a failed media company, sending out threats, | falsifying legal documents to enforce takedown requests, | and lawyering up to anyone who even considers applying | "their" algorithm on their own. "Their" idea may be | patentable in the US, but in areas of the world where there | is no such patent, these goons cannot take down the | competition without lying and dishonesty and they've shown | to do anything to prevent any competitor from entering the | market. | pmoriarty wrote: | Using spelling correction on a limited word set that | avoids ambiguities is a brilliant idea. It wouldn't solve | every issue with word-based systems (for instance, people | who don't speak the language will still have problems, | and it obviously wouldn't be as reliable without a | computer) but it's much better than W3W, and I hope | whoever implements an open W3W alternative implements it. | kybernetikos wrote: | I did one of these for fun at the beginning of the year, and | ended up needing to spend way more time on the wordlist than | I'd expected. In the end I felt that a list of 4096 words was | a decent compromise between accuracy and is still fairly | managable for trying to remove words that are too easy to | mistake for each other. It lets you do everywhere on earth to | slightly more accuracy than what3words in 4 words. | | Something that what3words does is not have an obvious | hierarchy of words (e.g. where the first one covers a larger | area, and subsequent words home in). I didn't like that, but | I understand why they do it - if a single word is going to | cover a large area, you have to be extra careful that you | don't choose something offensive for a particular region. By | having no obvious structure, they get away with being less | careful on the wordlist. | eterm wrote: | The issue of hierarchy is that it's orthogonal to having | very different results for nearby areas. | | With a hierarchy you immediately run into, "Am I in | gibbons.apple.banana or was it gibbons.apple.bandana" which | is just down the road. | | Without hierarchy it jumps out that one of those results is | improbable if tallied with any knowledge of roughly where | the person is. | kybernetikos wrote: | As you say, the issues are orthogonal. I randomise my | wordlist so places next to each other don't have words | necessarily close to each other in the alphabet. But | because it's hierarchical e.g. most places in the uk | start 'bishop'. I think this is good because you learn to | recognise places,but imagine if loads of places in India | started with the word 'colony'... it's a problem you | don't have to worry about if you don't use a hierarchical | scheme. | | https://wherewords.id/ | noir_lord wrote: | Funnily enough I did that math the other day when this kicked | off. | | It comes out to 4th root of ((510.1 trillion)/9) which is | ~2743.8 | | Where it gets interesting is that it's only ~4752 for 1mx1m | cells :) | | Another use for `Correct Horse Battery Staple` I guess. | ehsankia wrote: | > The word list already is 40k long | | To be fair, if the lookup table is created properly, the | majority of habited locations should be within the first two | bands, which means you're really only using 2500, or 5000 of | those words. That was the whole point of the banding system, | I assume. | cybergibbons wrote: | It's promoted for use in search and rescue, so other bands | are in use. | mike_d wrote: | I used to do SAR. Lost persons do a terrible job of | communicating because they are afraid and often | emotionally and physically drained. But if you have them | on a radio or a cell phone, you can generally locate them | without the persons direct assistance. | | One of the many things that really annoys me about W3W is | that it sucks for actual navigation. If I am at | waffle.tire.sigh is that north or south of keys.sad.tree? | Am I heading in the right direction? | cybergibbons wrote: | Yeah, multiple MRT members have contacted me to say this | is a real struggle. If someone is on the move, it's | virtually impossible to work out what direction they are | going. | mnw21cam wrote: | And there was I thinking that the main problem with What3Words | was a total lack of error detection/correction. | thinkingemote wrote: | Is this algorithm based on the "clean room" reverse engineering | effort? | cybergibbons wrote: | No, I went from the patent and using the API instead: | | https://twitter.com/cybergibbons/status/1386344576856825858 | | https://twitter.com/cybergibbons/status/1386393951276609539 | | https://twitter.com/cybergibbons/status/1386867562554793984 | | https://twitter.com/cybergibbons/status/1387164507705860097 | [deleted] | eruci wrote: | I built a latlon<->word system using geonames as the source of | the words. https://3geonames.org 146000 global place names in | total. | | The first word is the name of the most important geographical | location in the given area while the other 2 words are quasi | random. https://3geonames.org/LONDON-MOSCOW-PARIS is next to | https://3geonames.org/LONDON-MOSCOW-GASSIN . (places that are | about 160 metres apart will share both the first and the second | word) | | Lately I've been thinking of modifying the system to only use | place names from the country where the point falls in, so you | will only get British place names for locations that fall inside | Great Britain. You could also modify the code (it is open source) | to whatever you like. | | There is an infinite number of ways to skin this cat, but I doubt | we will ever all agree on just one. | rgovostes wrote: | Seems confusing to me to describe a location using the names of | unrelated other places. It would be even more confusing to | limit the word set in the way you describe. "Where do you | live?" "London-Oxford-Leeds." "Where is that?" "Outside | Brighton." | eruci wrote: | https://3geonames.org/London-Oxford-Leeds can also be | described as https://3geonames.org/LONDON-UAS | mattowen_uk wrote: | Everyone knows numbers. Just use semi accurate GPS co-ordinates. | Been around for decades, and already built into that phone you | are holding. | userbinator wrote: | Coordinates are also ordered and predictable, given your | current position you can intuitively determine in what | direction (and approximately how far) where other positions | are. | maxehmookau wrote: | As an idea, what3words appears to exist only to make money for | its owners. | | The UK already has an open, easy to use, well documented and | battle-tested way of defining any point in the country. Grid | references. | | What3Words doesn't actually solve a problem that isn't already | solved. | teachingassist wrote: | What3Words accounts at Companies House in the UK are extremely | interesting. | | They burned through just over PS15,000,000 in 2019, for a _total | revenue_ just under PS400,000 from 100+ employees. | mavhc wrote: | Costs a lot to get all the free publicity from journalists, got | to avoid them pointing out it's a private company trying to | control access to a coordinate system, or mentioning any | alternatives. | ealexhudson wrote: | I thought you were kidding, but apparently not. Even worse : | PS320k of that revenue was from sales to Daimler AG (a | shareholder) and is described as "services". I would love to | understand the business model here, they've maintained PS23M | ish cash at hand since end 2017 but I'm not clear what the play | here is... | trollied wrote: | I think that PS23m is just capital from issued shares. | Anyway, it's certainly not viable. I guess it remains to be | seen how long investors will keep on chucking money at it to | keep it afloat. | | Filing history, if anyone else is interested: https://find- | and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/c... | ealexhudson wrote: | No, it's definitely cash and equivalents. The shareholder | account is virtually PS50m at this point, and they had | nothing like that cash until the raises in 2017. | jack_riminton wrote: | I always wondered if they were actually used by anyone then I | saw their recent advertising and it seems to focus on emergency | services and finding places in large fields | | I created a project using an alternative method using gifs for | directions: http://gif.direct which I personally think is more | useful (if less refined!) | kawsper wrote: | They are dangerous for emergency services, here is a case | where W3W showed a location many miles away: | https://twitter.com/isleofmandan/status/1386455377949122561 | | Someone have also compiled a list of pairs that only differs | by one letter, like these two: | | instants.lightening.precedents | | instants.lightning.precedents | | You can see the whole map here: | https://twitter.com/cybergibbons/status/1385891425108250626 | | I wish they would just use "pluscodes" instead, the algorithm | is opensource and doesn't depend on a specific dictionary: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Location_Code | saalweachter wrote: | You also need to distinguish between the contexts where you | need addresses versus coordinates. | | Lat-longs, plus codes, and word-encoding schemes are all | coordinates -- they identify a point or area on the globe. | | Addresses are last-mile navigational instructions. "Apt D, | 123 Main St" allows anyone with local knowledge to navigate | efficiently to the location indicated: first they drive to | Main Street, then they proceed along the ~monotonically | numbered parcels to 123, then continue to the apartment | labeled "D". | | The advantage of coordinates is that they don't require | local knowledge and can identify arbitrary points; the | advantage of addresses is that they encode instructions for | land navigation that takes into account which parts of the | land are passable. | andi999 wrote: | What is wrong with classical coordinates for emergencies? | Like 42 degrees north, 13 minutes and 4.5 seconds? | blackboxlogic wrote: | I know of one rescue that didn't go smoothly because there | was confusion between degrees, minutes, seconds and decimal | degrees. | Doctor_Fegg wrote: | They've raised over PS80m. Astonishing. | | https://tech.eu/brief/london-based-location-tech-what3words-... | tgv wrote: | You mean people thought they were going to make a load of money | with this? And that they spend 5 times more money on this | simplistic google maps ripoff than the 40 employee company I | work for, which runs a PS250k profit? I am baffled. | NelsonMinar wrote: | A bunch of replies to this are "I implemented my own version of | What3Words". That sport has been around for a few years now. | https://what3emojis.com/ is probably the most long-lived; I'm | writing from telephone bus eggplant. (Hacker News' lack of emoji | support makes interop here a little difficult.) | | Unfortunately http://www.what3fucks.com/ seems to have ended | their incredible journey. | | It's a really stupid idea for addressing, triply so when you | consider the pathetic little proprietary word database that's | What3Words tool for extracting rents. Geohash is the oldest | system that solves the problem of "give me a short textual name | for a place" and has a nice ability to get more precise. | daleharvey wrote: | A location near me | | geohash: gcuvz30z w3w: drift.march.donor | | I had to switch tabs 3 times to copy across the geohash since | the page I found it on wouldnt let me copy and paste, I | remembered the w3w immediately. | | I am 100% against something like a global addressing standard | being owned by a single company, however the amount of people | ignoring w3w's extremely obvious utility and pointing to | pluscodes, geohashing, grid references, geocoords etc is pretty | tiring. | | We have a standards body for emojis, cant we just agree on an | open w3w implementation. | jasonwatkinspdx wrote: | Nelson is right. A bunch of us have played around with | designing our own human friendly geohash scheme. | | If you divide earth up into 4m x 4m cells using something | like the S2 projection, you can uniquely address these using | phrases of 3 words drawn from a database just under 32,000 | words. The S2 projection ensures that the words in the higher | levels of the hierarchy will change quite slowly. In most | local contexts there will be only a single commonly repeated | word. In a small number of more exceptional points there'd be | just 2 or 3 unique values in use. So in practice you could | use longer addresses and a smaller dictionary if you liked. | This is probably a good idea for ergonomic reasons, as we can | pick a set of words that are readily translated between | languages, weed out any that are overly similar, etc. | | I never uploaded the code anywhere, and it's on a laptop that | died, but I busted out a toy version of the above in an | afternoon a couple years ago just for fun. I used 4 word | addresses and a database of about 2,500 of the most common | english words. | | W3W's entire value proposition is that they should earn a | global rent off the use of addresses vs the above. It's | absurd. And they intentionally avoid hierarchical | organization of the addresses specifically to make it | necessary to use their app/service to look crap up, which | makes their service hilariously worse than the scheme | described above. | | With an S2 style hierarchy people will intuitively begin to | recognize the common words in their living area at each | level, and can use them in conversation without even | consulting software. This is completely impossible with W3W's | scheme. | | The problem isn't figuring out a good scheme. Most of the | people on this forum can manage that in a couple hours. The | problem is the same with all other standardization efforts: | getting a critical mass of people who give enough of a crap | to use the standard. | | This is an area where Google could ship something in maps and | it'd have a decent chance of adoption outside of it. If you | work on maps consider pitching a more ergonomic version of | plus codes. | real-dino wrote: | > cant we just agree on an open w3w implementation. | | They don't want that to happen, at least not an open source | implementation. They want to be in the position of Pantone | and colour. | tobr wrote: | > I remembered the w3w immediately. | | But in what situation is this useful? How is it more | convenient or useful than a regular address? Even if you're | somewhere where there are no addresses, and you need to | describe a location that has no other descriptive | characteristics, isn't it a lot easier to just drop a | pin/bookmark on the map in your smartphone? Especially | considering you can't reasonably run the algorithm without a | digital device of some kind. | physicsguy wrote: | It makes sense more in some countries than others. | | In Japan, for e.g. there are no street numbers. | | In the U.K. we have postal codes that _generally_ refer to | a street. But they sometimes can be only a portion of a | street, sometimes they're a building, sometimes they're a | large business who might be across multiple sites. At other | times (usually rural) they're very very long roads, so | sticking the address into a Sat Nav takes you to that road | but not the point on the road that you want to travel to. | Because the system is so mixed, 99 /100 nthe address is | absolutely fine, but occasionally it isn't. I agree | dropping a pin is more useful though. | | Ireland had no postal codes at all until recently. | daleharvey wrote: | Transferring the location from one place to another | | So aside from the fact that my address has around a 50/50 | success rate with people trying to find it (My address is a | building + street name that has a mirror building + street | name across the other side of a motorway) | | Transferring the address, the obvious example people give | is emergency services but this applies to so many | situations, I volunteer with a litter picking group and | they have found w3w extremely useful to communicate | locations, you "can" transfer a pin but you need those | devices set up to do a transfer already, with w3w I can | check the website for the location on my way out the door | and enter it to my map on the way, people who arent setup | as contacts can transfer it without having to trade phone | numbers etc. | | Its hard to understand how someone could not find a way to | easily memorize and communicate a specific location a very | useful thing? | timita wrote: | Which is absolutely fine in a non-critical scenario such | as picking litter, or finding your mates at a festival. | But, as the article demonstrates in detail, there are too | many possibilities for error, which in a life or death | scenario we cannot afford. Emergency services often deal | with exactly that kind of scenario. | kitd wrote: | _But in what situation is this useful?_ | | On the phone? There's a bit I don't like about W3W, but | efficiency of communication is their killer feature. | avianlyric wrote: | Classic example is emergency services. | | Having the ability to turn your location into three words | that will easily survive communication over a phone with | dodge signal is very useful. | | You could argue that that lat/lon or a street address | should be fine. But memorising a two sequences of numbers, | then repeating them accurately over a poor phone line is | hard. | | Street addresses are also hard, there's frequently not a | nearby road sign, or worse, the road name is ambiguous | (your city may have multiple streets with the same name). | Hell there's no guarantee that the emergency services even | have your street name in their database if it's a new | street, or it's name was changed recently. | | So basically any scenario where you need to transmit a | location accurately between two parties who are operating | two different mapping systems, and communicating over an | unreliable comms link (phone, radio etc), is a good use | case for W3W. W3W is like the phonetic alphabet for | locations. | | Personally I hate the fact the W3W are extracting rents | from this services. But I can't deny the utility of their | service. | tobr wrote: | That's honestly incredibly far-fetched. I need to have a | GPS and a device that is able to do the conversion from | lat/long to words. Given that prerequisite there are | about a dozen better ways to solve the issue. Both me and | the emergency services in the area need to know what | these word codes are, or we're spending time explaining | that in an emergency situation. The ability to use it | offline is nice but assumes that I prepared for that | ahead of time. | | Not to mention that a 40000 word word list has a lot more | room for misremembering and mishearing than spelling out | a sequence of digits. If it had used a word list that was | designed to be easily recognized by sound, had no plurals | etc, that would have been a different thing. | | Also, emergency services are local, but this system | wastes bandwidth on being able to describe any location | in the world. | cybergibbons wrote: | Why 3 words? Why not 4? | aembleton wrote: | Because it is enough to provide sufficient accuracy. | detaro wrote: | Why not 4 words and a smaller, less error-prone word | list? | cybergibbons wrote: | Only with a ridiculously long word list containing | plurals and words people can't spell. | jhgb wrote: | > https://what3emojis.com/ is probably the most long-lived | | What's the spatial resolution of that? Seems to be dozens of | meters at best. | SahAssar wrote: | The about page says 4m, but I could drag their example map | over multiple blocks in my city without the emojis changing. | jhgb wrote: | That's exactly the thing I noticed, too. | Twisell wrote: | The fundamental flaw for me goes deeper. | | Both services mimic the principle of URL shortener applied to | geographic location. (Even if, as you point out, one is public | domain machine readable and the other is proprietary human | readable one). | | But why are url shortener so popular in the first place? Why | are they perfectly usable even if competing services exits? | (and I'd bet most popular are self-generated like | youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ). | | I think they are popular mainly because they rely on the | ubiquitous HTTP protocol to be fully interoperable with almost | any HTTP client. | | There is no such universal protocol or library to manage | geospatial data provided in "custom hashed format". But all of | the various tools available will gladly accept a | latitude/longitude XY coordinate pair because they are | perfectly machine readable and while not human friendly they | actually mean something so that professionals can make sense of | the numbers if needed. Also as far as variable precision is | needed, let's throw a round(,) function and be set with it. | | So as of now both solution are essentially some kind of private | API with no widely available and stadardised support to revert | to a usable latitude/longitude. So I would guess many GIS power | users look at this suspiciously secretly hoping that no one | will ever share such obfuscated data format to them for any | critical use. | | NB : For more complex data representations there is a whole | standard defining organisation https://www.ogc.org that define | horribly complex (yet useful) data structures and gladly make | the standard freely and publicly available. Maybe they could | enforce a flavor of geohash into a FOSS standard so that | tooling could refer to it, but I'm not sure it's on their | roadmap. | jokoon wrote: | Yes, geohash makes more sense, letter numbers are better, since | people would still have to memorize words, which is a little | similar with letters. They would still write it down or copy | paste it. | | Another solution would be a smaller set of easier words, on | subgrids like geohash, because gradual precision is really | better. | lbbb wrote: | Other similar implementations were either DMCA'd off of various | platforms or had their domains seized by lawyers, their legal | actions go back a few years already | | I suppose the emoji version survives because it doesn't | infringe on their word list or patent, which specifically is | for "words" | rburhum wrote: | Hi Nelson, maybe you can explain this to me: why so much hate | towards what3words? Chris once came to our office to see if | there was a fit for us to use their invention. We did not find | that it solved a pain point for us, so nothing came out of | it... but the amount of rage that I see that they have been | accumulating towards the years. Is there a story behind it | beyond "I want to do something similar and can implement it, | but <patent>?" Thanks in advance | myself248 wrote: | Furthermore, there's a payola scheme behind the scenes, to | make sure automakers implement it in their infotainment | systems and stuff, which they hope will force others to | license it. | | It's a great idea, a mediocre implementation, and a set of | business practices that make the antichrist jealous. | | On top of that, their bloodthirsty pursuit of any criticism | means that legitimate discussions of the system's flaws can't | happen in the open. The lack of that criticism may have | encouraged some services to adopt W3W without realizing its | flaws, and there's already some hinting that such a flaw may | have already interfered with actual rescue operations: | | https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56901363 | | Thankfully the rescue was able to proceed once they switched | to another coordinate system, and that case didn't result in | a fatality. How many other such cases are there? We might | never know. The company may have literal blood on its hands | at this point, but fixing the flaws would require discussing | them first, which we can't do as long as they're empowered to | shut down discourse. | wwalexander wrote: | A standard for global addressing should not rely on a | proprietary algorithm or wordlist, as it means that there is | no legal method for using the standard besides using (paying | for) What3Words' API. This fits the common definition of | rent-seeking behavior. | | This couples with the technological issues outlined in the | article above. I believe the vitriol against W3W is fueled by | the combination of rent-seeking behavior on a standard of | poor technical quality. | | I'm also bothered that one of the main use cases W3W's | marketing highlights is for specifying locations in | emergencies, a totally non-commercial/public-good | application. W3W presents itself convincingly to laymen as | this sort of public-good open standard, but they're just | another startup with a proprietary product they're hoping to | monopolize. | jedberg wrote: | The hate is _because_ they patented it. It is a useful idea, | but it would be far more useful if the algorithm and wordlist | were public domain and didn 't require a license to use it. | DyslexicAtheist wrote: | W3W has sent a legal threat to a security researcher[1][2] | for tweeting about and sharing the open-source software | alternative WhatFreeWords. Great way to make friends! | | and here[3] is a long article of why w3w isn't safe for the | use-cases they're peddling. | | tl;dr: they're a garbage company, with a garbage product, run | by ghouls. | | [1] https://techcrunch.com/2021/04/30/what3words-legal- | threat-wh... | | [2] | https://twitter.com/AaronToponce/status/1387933438305394690 | | [3] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what3words-confusion- | suitable... | NelsonMinar wrote: | Hi Ragi! My complaint with What3Words is 85% their | proprietary business model. They are literally trying to | convince less developed countries to adopt their system in | lieu of developing their own addressing systems. So that | What3Words can forever force that country and anyone sending | mail to it to pay them fees. It is evil. | | This is not theoretical; back in 2017 they were bragging at | how they'd convinced the nations of Kiribati, Mongolia, Sint- | Maarten, Cote d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Tonga, Nigeria and the | Solomon Islands to use them as a national standard. I'm | certain that the actual usage is exaggerated on their part | but imagine if it were really true. Addressing is far too | important to be held by a proprietary company. Addressing is | a national service that countries should provide as part of | being a nation, and there's a long history of countries | developing addressing systems that does not rely on some | predatory intellectual property system. | | 5% of my annoyance is What3Words pretends like they invented | some brilliant new idea that's unique and should be IP | protected. No, the idea is older than them. And the | implementation is obvious to anyone with ordinary skill in | the art of addressing. Anyone competent with GIS concepts can | design a similar system in a few days' work. And there are | many better alternatives. | | The other 10% of my complaint is their static addressing | model. It's not good that two houses nearby have completely | different addresses; real addressing always has hierarchical | names and there's a reason for that. There's also a problem | using words in that they are localized to the country's | language. That's better than forcing English everywhere but | makes interoperability way more confusing. Finally there's | all the problems people keep finding with their word lists; | that's covered well by other writers so I won't go into it. | | PS: I misspoke when I said Geohash is the oldest similar | system. MGRS dates to the 1940s. There may be older ones, | too. | pbronez wrote: | Skip What3Words, use Placekey: https://www.placekey.io/ | | It's a better identifier and a much friendlier organization. | Technical details here: | https://docs.placekey.io/Placekey_Technical_White_Paper.pdf | Andrew_nenakhov wrote: | Placekey identifier is hard to remember and read. | TazeTSchnitzel wrote: | Is that another proprietary algorithm? | rocky1138 wrote: | Slick site, but I'm not able to use it as I'm not in the USA. | JimDabell wrote: | Placekey seems neat, but it only fully supports the USA and | partially supports the Netherlands. | ape4 wrote: | lol it says "universal" | hyko wrote: | A proprietary geocode solution remains a _terrible_ idea in | general, and especially in this case. | | The government should buy them, close them, and invest in | replacing the system with an open and international standard. | contravariant wrote: | Can't say I'm fond of their '///word1.word2.word3' notation. Why | couldn't they just use a URI scheme? | datfrojo wrote: | To me that's clear. Firstly most of their target audience has | no knowledge of what a URI scheme is and only care about the | three words. Secondly would be the branding ///x.y.z is | subjectively better branding then w3w://x.y.z | contravariant wrote: | I must admit that I don't really care much for how marketable | their notation is. | Nextgrid wrote: | Their whole "business model" (in quotes because thankfully | it doesn't seem to be anywhere near profitable) is to | convince naive people that they're the good guys helping | emergency services locate people, that their system is | flawless and that they're the first to solve this "problem" | so they can then rent-seek from GPS/mapping developers once | enough idiots swear by this system and start demanding it | as a feature. | naambread wrote: | I remember this guy way back from alt.ph.uk, he was always doing | quality posts back then. A brilliant fellow. Great to see another | excellent write-up from him. | cybergibbons wrote: | Old skool! Those were the days :) | [deleted] | sneak wrote: | Note that this company believes this algorithm to be proprietary, | and seem to have threatened people publishing information about | it. | | I avoid using or publicizing it for that reason. | PartiallyTyped wrote: | Geohash can give an accuracy of 0.019 KM at 8 characters, with | each additional character reducing error by nearly 1 or half an | order of magnitude and uses just 32 characters. | | Why not just map geohash to words? 32^9 << 40000^3, or if you | want higher accuracy, 32^12 << 40000^4. | | The mapping is very simple, 32^3 < 40000, map 32^3 to words and | back, then split geohash to 3 character long chunks, look them up | and combine them. Going back is equally trivial. | maxerickson wrote: | The "words for location" thing is kind of a non goal anyway. | They aren't good addresses, which benefit from following | patterns and being predictable, so the use case is for | communicating a location. | | It really only makes sense if you have an electronic device | that implements the algorithm and a communications channel that | only works for voice. Otherwise a beacon sent as data makes | more sense, and that can be the coordinates directly. | carstenhag wrote: | In some places (even in "first-world" countries like Spain, | my own experience) postal services, the police and visitors | don't have a clue where your house is located at. | | I'd pay 0,50EUR per delivery if amazon.es would allow me to | specify a what3word-address and have UPS/DHL/etc use it. For | years the drivers have been calling us, asking where the | address ist at... | | Also really fun when there were burglars in your house and | the police doesn't know where to drive to. | detaro wrote: | But as parent says, for that use case, the word-ness isn't | relevant - picking coordinates of a map or any of the other | position encodings would work just as well. And not require | paying W3W license fees for no good reason. | maxerickson wrote: | In the US we bit the bullet and regularized addresses (to | the county level, which is typically the biggest entity | providing urgent emergency services). | | A rural place I used to live formerly had a named road, | that got switched to a number that roughly locates it east | to west in the county, and then the house number was set to | roughly give the distance north from the nearest crossroad | to the south. So anyone that understands the addressing | system in the county can basically drive directly to any | address without any further information (with perhaps a few | short detours where roads don't continue or the like). | | Of course this works much better in a place that has | relatively new properly lines that were drawn based on a | regular survey, but I'd think there would be some momentum | to at least make things simpler over time. | iudqnolq wrote: | If you abandon the requirement to completely replace the existing | systems you can have a much smaller wordlist. For example, if we | trust people to know what county they are in we could have | duplicate triples in each country. Arguably we could go even | smaller, to the national subdivision (eg state) level | ehsankia wrote: | Isn't that what... zip codes/postal codes are? The whole point | of systems like this is to be able to point to any place on | earth. | iudqnolq wrote: | The point is to easily uniquely identify a point. I'm arguing | the tuple (California, some, simple, words) solves for that | use case better than (cromulently, extraneous, uniquely). | We're (I hope) not doing this just to be different but | because it has useful new properties. For example, street | address + zip isn't ideal when you're talking to Search and | Rescue. | | Edit: You can think of this like 9 square meter resolution | zip codes with a human friendly representation, yes. | ehsankia wrote: | Fair enough. That being said, I think PlusCodes are | basically the better worldwide "zipcodes", and while they | don't have the "three simple words" property, they do have | the property you speak of. | | You can basically truncate the first 4 character of the 8 | character chunk if you specify a city/country that's within | one block. You can also add arbitrary precision after the + | sign by adding more sub-blocks. | iudqnolq wrote: | That does sound great. I'll look into it. | qsort wrote: | Is there any reason why they didn't use a simple hashing | algorithm? At first sight it seems to me like they are just | trying to invent one, but without actually knowing how. | cybergibbons wrote: | Two reasons: 1. It needs to be reversible so you can go from | words to lat/lon. 2. They wanted to use shorter words in | cities, so the distribution of low n didn't want to cover the | full range of m. (this could probably be solved by some sort of | banding though). | michaelt wrote: | They have to do that if they want to ensure locations near one | another never share two of the three words, due to the birthday | paradox. | | Given their 9-square-meter locations and their urban area word | list of 2500 words, if you assigned the mapping randomly then | within London you'd expect there to be about 70,000 locations | with another location sharing two words within 50m. | | To put it another way, there would be a 13% chance of a soccer | pitch containing two locations that shared two words. | maxerickson wrote: | They wanted it to be proprietary. | yawnxyz wrote: | is the problem just that they treat plural and singular words | differently? Wouldn't just removing plurals, homophones, and | difficult to spell words get rid of most of these problems? | input_sh wrote: | Yes, mostly if you try to use voice recognition though. | Example: arrows vs arose, picture vs pitcher etc. | https://mobile.twitter.com/cybergibbons/status/1388416763549... | cybergibbons wrote: | You would still get high densities of cells which share two | words being present close together, leading to any issue with | the third word causing a confusing location. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-05-02 23:00 UTC)