[HN Gopher] My service to check whether an item is counterfeit o... ___________________________________________________________________ My service to check whether an item is counterfeit or not Author : chdaniel Score : 99 points Date : 2021-05-08 14:56 UTC (8 hours ago) (HTM) web link (bychgroup.com) (TXT) w3m dump (bychgroup.com) | nvarsj wrote: | I wonder what percentage of luxury goods are fake on Ebay? In my | own experience, 100%. The sellers are not even apologetic - they | take your return, issue a refund, and immediately relist the | item. | chdaniel wrote: | Lots of fakes on eBay | | They started efforts to curate that, but it's far from cleaning | eBay 100% | | What you're saying happens, more often than we wish it'd be the | case. | | That's why we never considered charging for our guides, even | something as little as $1 - The point was to allow people to | inform themselves about fakes, with as little friction as | possible | | That way, if we bump the % of people who get scammed by even a | few negative points, we'd still be happy for a positive | contribution | magneticnorth wrote: | This is great, very impressive that they've had such success with | a scrappy 2-person business. | | The hard part of success like this often seems to be finding an | under-served niche where you have, or can easily gain, some | expertise. If anyone knows of a guide or has advice for how to | solve that problem, I'd love to hear it. | ohadpr wrote: | One thing I couldn't figure out by skimming through the article | is who performs the actual authentication (checking if an item is | counterfeit)? Is it the two founders? Do they have a team working | on this? | chdaniel wrote: | We do as well, but it's not only us. So the answer is a team. | We get help from others as well on authentications! | koreanguy wrote: | a person places a order appointment to website, that piece | order has the customers item location normally just a url with | a picture like on eBay or amazon, now one of the team members | tracks a authentic item from the main company and gets a high | def picture or the actual product. and simply compares it | against the listed eBay item. if anything is mismatches like | wrong label wrong tag etc it gets recorded and sent to | customer, website says thank for service and that's end of it . | | its a good format for long term customers who buy a lot of | expensive items online and need to have third party eyes and | opinions | mrtksn wrote: | I don't know why this is flagged. It's a legit entrepreneurial | story(We can't know if the the claims are true but the story is a | legit one). | | At first it was hard to understand what it is all about and | sounded like get rich quick scheme but essentially it is about | someone building a service to check the authenticity of physical | items. | FlagBrigade wrote: | The flagging system needs to be more open. If a user flags a | post/comment they need to give a reason. These reasons, along | with the username, needs to be accessible to everyone, not just | moderators, so people can be aware why their submission is | wrong, or whether there is a pattern to certain users flagging | behavior. | ravi-delia wrote: | The username would seem to provide a golden path for | harassment. The reason, though, makes sense. | matsemann wrote: | I actually found the writeup refreshing in acknowledging the | luck (but also the hard work) behind the success. | | Also unsure why it's flagged when I came back to comment after | reading. The vouch button is also missing for me (or is that | only for dead stuff? Not sure what the difference is) | mrtksn wrote: | Yep, I like the writing style too. Upvoted but don't know if | this will help. | disgruntledphd2 wrote: | It takes a lot of upvotes to cancel out flags, | unfortunately. | chdaniel wrote: | Hey thanks! I was curious to see if handling the topic of | luck did vibe with people. Thanks for taking the time to | mention this, as it's very valuable to me | chdaniel wrote: | It's true that the title was sensationalistic, and I'm the OP. | I probably hang too much in the 'build in public' sphere where | it's all about the numbers | | I mean it'd obviously benefit me more if we kept the old title, | but that'd be too much me, and too little for the community | | Title got corrected and I'm actually grateful the post wasn't | fully taken down (or that I wasn't banned) | | EDIT: And thanks for the comment below saying u upvoted! | guerrilla wrote: | I flagged it originally because at a glance it looks exactly | like a scam. I unflagged it after seeing people actually having | a discussion about it and saying there's something to it. | anfractuosity wrote: | Very interesting! Out of interest with say a 'super fake' Rolex, | would it still be possible to tell if it's real/fake from only | external photos of the watch? | | I'm curious if they have or might reach a point whereby you'd | need to open up the watch and look at the movement quality? | chdaniel wrote: | It's still possible! | | It'd help us to open the watch, naturally, but we can still | rely on pics. Make no mistake though -- the watches can be | 99.5% perfect, but (at least for the watches we're handling, | which have high values) the compromise in manufacturing | processes is spotted one way or another | | It's worth pointing out that the discussion about replacing | pieces of a fake watch with authentic pieces (making a so- | called 'franken' watch, as rep watch connoisseurs call it) is a | totally separate discussion | iandinwoodie wrote: | There is a spectrum of replica quality in the watch world. Some | watches are very obvious to spot while others would be | impossible to spot from a photo. There is also the concept of a | frankenwatch: a watch that is a blend of original and non- | original parts. Assuming the builder has done their research | and due diligence with part selection, you would likely not be | able to identify a frankenwatch from an original if they were | sitting right in front of you. As a result, all watch exchange | forums that I have visited have suggest that authenticity of a | purchased watch be verified from a authorized dealer for that | brand. | | To expand on this, serious watch collectors will keep service | records from authorized dealers as proof of authenticity. For | example, many models of Rolex have "service" parts that differ | from the parts originally used in the model. Pricing general | follows the hierarchy: original parts > oem service parts > | non-oem replacement parts. The pricing gap between each of | those steps can be in the tens of thousands. So if eBay | authenticates a Rolex as original and you later on find out it | has some non-oem replacement parts, you've likely lost a | significant amount of money on that transaction. | [deleted] | [deleted] | Codesleuth wrote: | So people are just paying for your opinion or do you have some | sort of credentials? | | I find it ironic that you are selling authenticity checks, and | yet I can't tell if the check is authentic. | chdaniel wrote: | We do. B2B Partnerships, some big companies trust us, and | ultimately, I thought of the academic world so as to prove the | expertise (I'm the complete opposite of an academic) | | * We write public guides (see: https://legitcheck.app/explore- | the-library/) - we have about 1m words written on the subject * | People are free to contest it. If we're wrong, we'll correct * | The more other people link to our guides, the more we get... | credentials, I guess? | amelius wrote: | > some big companies trust us | | Can't the infosec community define and setup a "trust" | network? | | E.g. everybody trusts a number of people, and trust can be | transitive (perhaps with weights). Hence when I read some | review the network can compute a trustworthiness value. If | the product turns out to be fake, the system can do a | backprop and adjust weights. Etc. etc. | chdaniel wrote: | You're defo smart with what you're saying | | But the challenge would then be to explain something like | this to the average non-techie who's just buying some | expensive sneakers because they're cool | iandinwoodie wrote: | Yeah, basically a chain of trust certificates like outlined | by X.509. I think managing the chain of trust would be a | pretty involved process. | Codesleuth wrote: | I really admire your approach to this. Making guides should | not only improve your credibility but also overall help | reduce the market of fakes by reducing demand. | chdaniel wrote: | It's exactly what we aim for! | | That's why we never considered charging for our guides, | even something as little as $1 - The point was to allow | people to inform themselves about fakes, with as little | friction as possible | | That way, if we bump the % of people who get scammed by | even a few negative points, we'd still be happy for a | positive contribution | raldi wrote: | Do counterfeiters ever use your service to find ways to improve | their impersonations? | xzel wrote: | Sneaker counterfeiters generally don't care all that much about | pass authentication checks. For shoes, and most clothing, they | care more about time to market (getting their fake out before | or near release date) and price point. If someone is wearing | fake shoes, unless they're outlandishly fake (there were some | hot pink fake yeezys I've seen more than one), you mostly | likely won't be able to spot these imperfections from a | distance. Also, unless you're in the niche you probably won't | care if they're real or fake. I'd liken this to hanging prints | of famous paintings; people like the look but might not want to | shell out for a Picasso. | | I work with shoes on a daily basis and have done/do auth | checks. | jasonladuke0311 wrote: | Yeah unfortunately this is true. There are absolutely fakes | that get passed through StockX/GOAT/eBay and even | sneakerheads wouldn't guess. Some are even made on the same | production lines with the same staff, etc, according to some | people in the rep industry (yeah that's weaselly, sorry). I | have disputed purchases when I got inauthentic items but they | were fairly obvious. | chdaniel wrote: | /u/not-math put it perfectly in the reply | not_math wrote: | I feel like it's not a knowledge problem to the counterfeiters, | but more of how the economics work in counterfeits. | | A lot of people are ready to pay for a 20$ bag on AliExpress | and probably never seen how a real Louis Vuitton bag feels, so | they don't see/feel the difference. Same thing for jewelries, | watches, shoes, etc. You see a lot of fake Yeezy (for example), | and you can probably get a similar enough shoe to the real one, | but it'll cost 100-200$, and most people are not ready to pay | this price for a "fake". | | On r/repladies, I've seen girls pay 1200$ for "fakes" that are | very similar to the real product, at a certain point that only | a handfuls of people will see the difference. | walrus01 wrote: | Using this image as an example: | | https://bychgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-1-102... | | What would stop a particularly clever counterfeiting factory from | using this service as a 'check list' of things to change, to | improve the authentic appearance of their work product? Seems | like a bargain for the price. | chdaniel wrote: | There's even more info for them in any of the guides: | https://legitcheck.app/explore-the-library/ | | e.g. for this very item in the screenshot, the guide is: | https://legitcheck.app/guides/real-vs-fake-hermes-birkin/ | | Partly answered here: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27090248 | | Partly answered by someone else here: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27089111 | walrus01 wrote: | Having never been in the market for such things, what price | would the fake Hermes Birkin bag in the example URL typically | sell for? Either on aliexpress or similar or in a domestic | retail market in China? The fake certainly seems good enough | to pass casual inspection from a distance. | 101008 wrote: | What happens when a buyer disputes a counterfeit item with their | "message" and the seller doesn't agree? It may be easy to | differentiate with counterfeit shoes, but what happens with art | pieces, books, collectors' items in general? | | (My experience: I collect Harry Potter books. Signed copies were | always faked, because it is "easy" to forge a signature. But | lately I've been seen fake first printings. Some people buy 2nd | or 3rd printings (way cheaper) and change the page with the | bibliographical details, which is hard to spot. Other ones even | printed the whole book, those are a bit easy to spot because a 25 | years old book shouldn't look as new, but if you buy it online | seeing only photos, you may get scammed after paying thousdans of | dollars) | chdaniel wrote: | > It may be easy to differentiate with counterfeit shoes, but | what happens with art pieces, books, collectors' items in | general? | | We don't do art or books, but we do some collectors' items | | > What happens when a buyer disputes a counterfeit item with | their "message" and the seller doesn't agree? | | We ourselves can help if the customer paid via paypal/credit | card -- we've got the service mentioned in the article, which | gets people's money back with 99.9% success rate, which we also | guarantee it (so if it doesn't get your money back from the | bank or from PayPal, we refund the $60 you paid us) | | But yes -- if you've been scammed by a malevolent seller, they | might even believe the 'message' (they themselves know the item | is fake anyway) and not care to do anyhting | bradleyjg wrote: | First edition Harry Potter books are worth thousands of | dollars?!? I'm assuming that's only in mint condition but wow. | bombcar wrote: | First edition first volume was a much smaller print run than | subsequent volumes. | bradleyjg wrote: | So if I bought the first day it was available, that's not | necessarily first edition? | __turbobrew__ wrote: | Counterfeiting is becoming a real problem in Magic The Gathering. | Just this past week I received a counterfeit card in an order | from a reputable business. Once you start buying expensive MTG | cards you need to know how to spot a counterfeit in order to | protect yourself. Luckily with MTG cards the printing process is | the same with cheap cards and expensive cards so you can easily | compare the cards for differences. I imagine most people buying | Yeazys don't have an authentic pair to compare with. | | I'm wondering how "counterfeit aware" payment processors (VISA, | Mastercards, etc) are becoming? It seems like counterfeits are | only going to become more frequent in the future and payment | processors should have some awareness of counterfeits when | investigating a chargeback claim. | alasdair_ wrote: | The bigger issue is that the good counterfeits can get PSA or | BGS graded (either officially, or a fake slab). PSA guarantees | that their graded cards are genuine but Beckett does not. | | With an Alpha Black Lotus going for over $500K, it's only a | matter of time before undetectable counterfeits exist. | rasz wrote: | In what way is it a problem exactly? are counterfeit cards | printed with unreadable font? do they fall apart when used? | oooh, you mean its a problem for speculat^^^^investors, not for | actually playing the game? | __turbobrew__ wrote: | My main problem with counterfeit cards is when someone pays | for authentic cards but they receive counterfeits instead. If | both parties knowingly buy and sell counterfeit cards I don't | have any problem with it. | | In addition to counterfeits not being tournament playable, | they are not collectable either. It feels good to own/play | cards which are rare, valuable, and a part of MTGs history. | squeaky-clean wrote: | If you're trying to imply counterfeiting doesn't actually | affect gameplay, counterfeit cards are not tournament legal. | If you paid $100 to purchase a playset of 4 cards and you | show up to a tournament and get declined entry, you'd | rightfully be pissed at the counterfeiter. | | Maybe the next response to that is "who cares about | tournaments. Just play kitchen table magic with your | friends." In that case sure, but still don't use counterfeit | cards. "Proxy" cards are when a player prints out (or even | hand-scribbles on paper) the image of the "real" card they | want to use. No one is scammed out of money. It doesn't cost | anymore than a sheet of printer paper and some ink. And | because the card is obviously not official, there's no | confusion as to it's authenticity. | treeman79 wrote: | At high levels, when a Tactic is to hoard certain cards, so | that no one can "counter" your deck. | | Never mind things like a black lotus which is over powered | but still legal due to rarity. | ravi-delia wrote: | Black lotus is illegal in tournament play except for | Vintage. | [deleted] | dang wrote: | " _Be kind. Don 't be snarky. Have curious conversation; | don't cross-examine._" | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | chdaniel wrote: | @"I imagine most people buying Yeazys don't have an authentic | pair to compare with." -- that's right! It's the position I was | in, which is what I come close to mentioning in the article: | it's why I made the app in the first place. | | So even better than that would be a public guide where both the | fake and the real are. That, plus somebody who's put in the | hours to do a thorough job to explain the differences they've | found. | | @MTG - Somebody was just telling me the other day about these | perfect (or 99% perfect) clones of Warhammer figurines. I | didn't even know they can reach $1,000+ figures, but hey, with | today's asset products, that doesn't surprise me. | | Magic The Gathering, Pokemon games (not cards -- we've covered | a free guide on that), Warhammer -- it seems like sky is the | limit really. Whatever can be replicated and is worth $200+ | _will be_ replicated IMO | | > I'm wondering how "counterfeit aware" payment processors | (VISA, Mastercards, etc) are becoming? | | A bit more! They trust our Certificate with less pushback these | days, more than 2 years ago, when we discovered our Certificate | can get people's money back. We guarantee the Certificate | nonetheless, so if it doesn't get your money back from the bank | or from PayPal, we refund the $60 you paid us. | | I know you said payment processors, but it's the banks | (exception: AMEX) that are responsible for that segment of the | transaction, AFAIK -- with chargebacks and what have you | | But if there would be an easily integrable solution for | banks/payment processors, I can see them moving vertically into | that | whalesalad wrote: | I still don't really understand what this person is selling. | chdaniel wrote: | "that's what we do -- we tell people whether their item is fake | or authentic. Not authentication as in login authentication" | | Should've made it clearer - a mistake on my part. | | So you know how there are fakes of Rolex, Nike, Louis Vuitton | etc -- some are scarily close. We make guides on how to tell | the fake from the real item, with the best fakes. | | We teach people (for free) | | But we also have a service, if they want us to check it for | them | wheybags wrote: | Your blog post is a bit incomprehensible tbh. I did get it | eventually, but I got a good bit into the article before I | did. #1 issue for me is you say "writing order notes", and | that doesn't make sense at all to me. "verifying whether | products are fake or legitimate" would be a _much_ better | article title. | chdaniel wrote: | Hmm, okay. Too much in my own bubble with that notion then | | The 'order notes' is a field in any e-commerce store, where | you (the store) can send the customer a message | | Think: "your order has been shipped" | | But we write it manually -- "your item is authentic because | X and Y" -- that's our order note. And at the same time our | service | | What I tried to do with the title was show the scrappiness. | Maybe even inspire some hackers to be scrappy or to look | for something other than perfection first | | Because if you're pitching to a VC that you're starting an | authentication company for luxury items | | And you'll claim that you'll use the WooCommerce 'order | notes' section, you'd be laughed out of the room. And not | like the Airbnb founders -- without that second part of the | story where you prove them wrong | [deleted] | mtalantikite wrote: | Yeah I had no idea what this was about and had to Google | "Order Notes", which also didn't turn up much. Bailed on | the article pretty quickly since I didn't understand | anything, assuming I wasn't the target audience. | chdaniel wrote: | Hmm, okay. Too much in my own bubble with that notion | then The 'order notes' is a field in any e-commerce | store, where you (the store) can send the customer a | message | | Think: "your order has been shipped" | | But we write it manually -- "your item is authentic | because X and Y" -- that's our order note. And at the | same time our service | | What I tried to do with the title was show the | scrappiness. Maybe even inspire some hackers to be | scrappy or to look for something other than perfection | first | | Because if you're pitching to a VC that you're starting | an authentication company for luxury items | | And you'll claim that you'll use the WooCommerce 'order | notes' section, you'd be laughed out of the room. And not | like the Airbnb founders -- without that second part of | the story where you prove them wrong | the_local_host wrote: | Even after understanding that the service is about | distinguishing fake from legitimate products, I still don't | know what an "order note" is. | chdaniel wrote: | Hmm, okay. Too much in my own bubble with that notion | then The 'order notes' is a field in any e-commerce | store, where you (the store) can send the customer a | message | | Think: "your order has been shipped" | | But we write it manually -- "your item is authentic | because X and Y" -- that's our order note. And at the | same time our service | | What I tried to do with the title was show the | scrappiness. Maybe even inspire some hackers to be | scrappy or to look for something other than perfection | first | | Because if you're pitching to a VC that you're starting | an authentication company for luxury items | | And you'll claim that you'll use the WooCommerce 'order | notes' section, you'd be laughed out of the room. And not | like the Airbnb founders -- without that second part of | the story where you prove them wrong | leeoniya wrote: | i've always wondered how this works, on antiques roadshow, | etc. can't the manufacturers of the fakes simply take the | course, learn the subtlties, and make better fakes? | dv_dt wrote: | I would like to think that as the quality of the work | improves, it makes more and more sense to establish your | own brand instead of duplicating the work of another | entity. Of course it all breaks down if the faked brands | aren't making all that high a quality items. | 83457 wrote: | Diminishing returns on perfection. | dpritchett wrote: | Presumably the perfect fake often costs too much to | reliably manufacture. | | Think of the randomness inherent in the microscopically | unique features of the original and how you might emulate | them reliably with a margin that still lets you compete | with its luxury pricing. | NationalPark wrote: | Have you noticed anyone using your guides to make fakes | targeted to fool your authentication? Do you keep a few clues | secret just to be sure? | chdaniel wrote: | > Do you keep a few clues secret just to be sure? | | Not really. We give away everything we have. As others've | mentioned, fake manufcaturers get diminishing results by | spending the extra $$$ to go from 95% to 99% | | Whe anyway, as part of 95%, the exterior side is 99% done. | The last 5 bits are interior details unseen by anyone but | the wearer | | All they care about is selling more products to fake | wearers. And fake wearers care only about exterior | MereInterest wrote: | My understanding is that some of the "fakes" for high-end | fashion are due to multiple factories building products to | the same specifications, but only the first one to deliver | them gets paid. The others are still built to the exact same | specification, and are functionally identical except for the | logo. Is my understanding correct, and does your service | distinguish between "fake because it isn't officially | blessed" and "fake because it uses inferior construction"? | | I tend to see the following categories overall, and while I'm | not at all interested in the label/authenticity side of | things, I have a difficult time identifying well-constructed | or poorly-constructed household items. | | * Real label, high quality. Good to have, but much more | expensive than I can usually justify. | | * Real label, low quality. Typically when a brand has just | been bought out, and is trying to cash in on a reputation | while using cheaper construction. | | * Fake/knock-off label, low quality. Trash, masquerading as a | good deal. | | * Fake/knock-off label, high quality. The absolute sweet | spot, getting the higher quality build without needing to pay | for the social "authenticity" of the brand label. | hattmall wrote: | It's more like this: A company contracts with a factory, | they want 100,000 pair of shoes. The factory however is | going to make a million or keep making it until there's no | one to buy it. These are called "ghost shift" goods which | is the bulk of counterfeits. If the product is not a | limited run and still being produced the quality will be | exactly the same. If the original manufacturer is no longer | purchasing then the factory will very likely use cheaper | materials. | | The brands know this happens, they really don't care, what | the brand will do is send a couple workers to the factory | to be QC buyers. The factory makes a million items, and the | QC workers will go through and pick out the best 100,000. | The other 900,000 will be sold in the the developing world. | The brand will typically take the 100,000 then send them to | the US or Europe to another factory where they will have | tags sewn in them and possibly some more labels or insignia | attached. If it's a particularly premium brand they will | add some secret identifying marks that even this LegitCheck | website is unlikely to know about. | | Those secret marks are typically for extremely high end | goods that have lifetime warranties etc and the only time | it's checked is if you send it in for warranty work. | | A LOT of these goods are completely indistinguishable and | will even make it into the retail supply chain. | Particularly at stores like TJ Maxx, Bealls, and Ross et | al. Though they go through a series of distributors that | will basically only exist for a few shipments to avoid | liability after some previous large lawsuits. | | Ross and Burlington will also knowingly buy the ghost shift | goods but keep them unbranded and sell them in stores with | no labeling at all. You can find these clothes and they | will have a tag sewn into that has a lot number. You can | take that lot number and put it in to import manifest | search engines and find out what brand was also importing | them. | | This would be where you find your coveted Fake / Knock off | high quality with the best success. | roofwellhams wrote: | But maybe you could explain the whole use case. | | I doubt sometime that bought a pair of air max will pay you | 60usd to say it's not authentic. | | Then I guess they will copy your message to their paypal | claim? | | PayPal sides with buyer like 90% of the time anyway.. | tyingq wrote: | See https://legitcheck.app/ | | The headline doesn't help much. They are doing more than _" | writing order notes"_. It's a service to check whether an item | (watch, purse, designer clothing, etc) is counterfeit, divided | into 3 use cases: | | -You're about to buy an item and you're not sure whether it's | authentic or not | | -You've already bought an item and you don't know if you've | been scammed | | -You've been scammed and you want to get your money back | chdaniel wrote: | Yep, correct! | | We do more than writing order notes in the sense that we now | have: | | * A Price Comparison tool | | * A SaaS for resellers (that sucks. we need to fix it) | | * A lot of words written on public guides | | * We just started a video library | | But ultimately, the bread and butter is our service. And the | workflow _is_ : | | * People place an order | | * We handle it by replying to them via order notes | acmecorps wrote: | Congrats on being on the HN homepage! :). I'm wondering tho | - does this check if a website that claims to be selling | something online is a scam or not? | chdaniel wrote: | Thanks a bunch ACME Corps! I see you everywhere lol | | Nope, we don't check for that. Others might do but that's | outside our area of expertise. | | We pretty much authenticate what we ourselves have | 'earned' the right to authenticate, by covering the item | in a free, public guide first: | https://legitcheck.app/explore-the-library/ | lazide wrote: | No offense, but you seriously need someone with some | business and sales expertise to help you. | | While that may be your workflow, that is almost never what | any customer cares about or makes decisions based on. What | they care about is how you are going to help THEM, by how | much, and at what cost. The actual workflow is rarely even | secondary, it usually the last step/usage thing post-buy | decision for the vast majority of people. | chdaniel wrote: | No offense taken! Especially since you're right | | We are a scrappy company and we're looking to mature, | given the figures we've done the last year. I'd love to | know if you'd still have the same opinion after going | through our customer workflow | | (since yes, what we've discussed is our internal | workflow) | lazide wrote: | I wasn't able to find a way to your customer | experience/UI workflow the first time I read the article | (which is odd - you have some words that seemed to | clearly be intended to be links to it, but they were dead | to me). Second time, I just went to your footer to your | holding company, and was able to figure out the actual | product from the list there. I didn't download it though. | I also figured out that some of your links ARE live, just | not the ones I expected, and will take me to the app. | Despite being interested at the beginning, I lost | momentum and stopped. | | You clearly have a viable product, and have already | started doing some solid sales despite having no sales | (or marketing) expertise - which is great, and you're in | an awesome place! | | The next challenges are finding and scaling more ways to | reach customers, conveying the value you can provide them | in a way they can understand at scale, and converting | those 'take my money!' potential folks into actual | orders. Then executing on them at scale, of course. | | The sales and the execution side are separate sets of | expertise. Managing people from those backgrounds to get | what you want is also a challenge for most | execution/technical founders. Most folks with your | background and having done what you have, will be quite | comfortable with the execution side and people who also | like it. | | If you think of it as a computing system, you've got a | great 32 core machine with an awesome GPU and 32GB of | memory. You're bottlenecking on the 80's era Amiga tape | drive you somehow managed to boot off of. | | If you get yourself even a halfway decent 20GB drive from | a decade+ ago, you'll be doing leaps and bounds more | business. If you find a modern SSD, even more. | | There are a number of books out there for how to do sales | as a technical founder, I can try to dig one up if you're | interested. | chdaniel wrote: | You're clearly having _some_ experience, if not lot | | Is there any chance I can get your mentorship over a vid | call? No commitment for more | | The 32-core, 32 GB of memory made sense to me | | EDIT: Just to not risk losing this in a not-seen-HN-reply | -- if yes, let me know where I can reach out, or my | Twitter is this: https://twitter.com/chddaniel | paulpauper wrote: | You do realize he is making almost $200k profit. I think | he knows what he is doing | onlyfortoday2 wrote: | exactly LOL HN | lazide wrote: | Not if he could be making half a billion if he could | articulate what he does? | | The thread and feedback/discussion is clearly helping, as | he's getting a lot clearer on what he actually does and | what the value is. | | But my point stands. With someone who has business and | sales sense, he could be doing dramatically better. | nsxwolf wrote: | Headline sounds like some get rich quick scheme but really | the product being sold is a tremendous amount of knowledge | and expertise about product manufacturing. | chdaniel wrote: | Hmm, defo didn't meant to come across that way | | In all honesty, the post got inspired by this HackerNews | hall-of-famer: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19728132 | | It sounded like an interesting story | | As we leave our scrappiness behind soon, I thought some | hackers would like to hear our (scrappy) story | dang wrote: | We can restore the post but I'm not sure what an accurate | title would be. What are some options for an accurate | title? (Edit: I've pinched tyingq's from upthread for | now.) | | "I sell onions on the internet" is a fine HN title; it's | unusual and intriguing without being overly sensational. | "How I made $XXX per year" is not a good HN title; it's | extremely common and $sensational $dollars are | $sensational. But don't worry--it's far more important | that the article itself be good! | chdaniel wrote: | Then it's my mistake -- probably I spent too much time in | the 'build in public' bubble which is all about the | numbers, and I forgot to get myself out of that bubble | | I'd change the title to "I authenticate items for | strangers for a living" -- but if that doesn't fit | either, the current title is ok | | Thanks Dan! | [deleted] | dang wrote: | I'm pinched your phrase for the title above, since the | original was baity and probably provoked the flags. Thanks! | koreanguy wrote: | its a service, think of it like this, you and your friend go | into a shoe shop and you want tell your friend do you know if | this is fake or real ? and your friend answers . | ww520 wrote: | They are the product authenticators. You know people bring | their antiques to the antique TV show and ask the antique | authenticators to verify the authenticity of the items. It's | the same kind of service. Kudos for them to make a business out | of it. | redwood wrote: | Why would you tell the world your business model? | chdaniel wrote: | Because I don't think the business model is something worth | guarding. Or that if somebody else replicates it (they have), | we have a lot to lose. | | I do believe in moats, and I'm trying my best to see what moats | I can build on top of what we have to 'protect' the business | vishnugupta wrote: | I think you left out a crucial part. How did you develop the | skill to spot a fake? The encyclopedic domain knowledge that | you possess is the anchor of your business and the value you | being to the table. How did you gain that knowledge? | | Super cool! Thanks for sharing this though. | chdaniel wrote: | Honestly I just 'hamstered' all the material I could on the | most popular items. | | In the beginning, in those first 10 guides I mention in the | article, I just curated all the splintered bits of info* | from the internet into one mega-guide, and added what I | found after analysing fakes | | * bits of info from as little as a forum thread comment, | lost on page 48, to a full-blown attmept at a guide that, | to me, wasn't exhaustive enough | | In time, it refined to partly what I did in the beginning, | and partly our own research which got better with exercise | | Package all that info in a free, properly formatted guide | (with some imperfect English, I admit, as we're not | natives), and that gives us the traffic figures I | screenshot'd | tyingq wrote: | The moat seems to be the actual expertise. | | See one of their guides: https://legitcheck.app/guides/fear-of- | god/fake-vs-real-nike-... | jmchuster wrote: | Right, it looks their business model is actually | | 1) Becoming the world's leading expert on a topic | | 2) Share and spread that knowledge, until you have publicly | cemented your place as an expert | | 3) Start charging for services that require usage of your | expertise | chdaniel wrote: | OP here. | | A pretty fair model if you ask me! I think generally we | move more towards that model as the internet progresses | | To me, before starting this, it looked like all the ones | who made a noticable bump did it this way. It's why we hate | Instagram gurus, I'd say | hellbannedguy wrote: | There is a lot of niche FB groups who know their | products/hobbies. | | I was just about to drop FB, but the groups are handy. | nkrisc wrote: | What's to protect? There's no secret. You send them pictures | and money and they tell you if it's fake or not. There's no | secret sauce beyond their personal knowledge. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-05-08 23:00 UTC)