[HN Gopher] Germany bans Facebook from handling WhatsApp data ov... ___________________________________________________________________ Germany bans Facebook from handling WhatsApp data over privacy concerns Author : giuliomagnifico Score : 242 points Date : 2021-05-11 18:00 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.euronews.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.euronews.com) | the-dude wrote: | IIRC this was exactly the policy the EU required for allowing the | acquisition in the first place. | annadane wrote: | Right? And then they went ahead and did it anyway | FridayoLeary wrote: | Unless we have German police personally looking over shoulders | wherever WhatsApps data is handled, i don't see how this exchange | of information can be prevented. | fishmaster wrote: | I think it's more that they can be fined heavily should it ever | be found out. | eqvinox wrote: | The aspect I find most interesting and internationally relevant | is that as these local rulings proliferate, they kinda make it | visible to what degree companies finance their operations by | selling user data. The more the business model relies on this, | the more likely companies are to get hit with a ruling like this | -- and it's not just the ruling that's interesting, but also what | Facebook's reaction will be. If they stop offering or reduce | WhatsApp services in Germany (or India), that's a great indicator | that the service isn't profitable without the sale (or other | commercial exploitation, Facebook is an ad company after all) of | large amounts of user data. | vineyardmike wrote: | Reducing service can also be a strong-armed way to force | customers to advocate for them. | | "Want to keep talking to grandma? Better tell your government | to leave us alone" | leipert wrote: | I am actually using this argument in the inverse: "hey | grandma, do you still wanna see baby pictures, please install | <other-messenger>" | DeliriumTrigger wrote: | That's exactly what they are doing right | now...https://www.welivesecurity.com/2021/05/11/whatsapp- | limit-fea... | lucian1900 wrote: | The same happened at a smaller scale when Chinese regulators | ruled loot boxes must disclose their loot tables. Even though | they aren't guaranteed to be identical in other countries, a | great deal was learned about how such games operate. | cuillevel3 wrote: | Whatsapp already had a separate privacy policy for the European | region (https://www.whatsapp.com/legal/updates/privacy-policy- | eea?la...) | | Apparently that was too permissive. I guess they had to try? | zwaps wrote: | The privacy policy mildly states that they do not share | personal data with facebook for ads right now. | | But it also says they might do so at any time, at the latest | when the EU okays it. | | So yeah, at the very least it is too vague to be a proper | privacy policy allowing informed consent | thamer wrote: | This article is pretty vague. What does it even mean to ban | Facebook "from using data from WhatsApp users"? | | Facebook "uses data from WhatsApp users" to support basic | features like authentication, is that banned now? What about | sending a WhatsApp message to a contact, doesn't that "use data | from WhatsApp users"? Facebook has to look up some internal user | ID (user data), then route the message to their devices, probably | by device ID (also user data). How do you do that if using data | banned? | | I suspect there's more to it but this particular article isn't | telling the story in a particularly clear or helpful manner. | Hopefully the actual injunction is not as vague. | Barrin92 wrote: | From Spiegel: | | _" Am Dienstag gab Caspars Behorde bekannt, dass sie eine | Anordnung erlassen hat, die es Facebook - also der Mutterfirma | von WhatsApp - verbietet, personenbezogene Daten von WhatsApp | zu >>eigenen Zwecken<< zu verarbeiten. | | Gemeint ist damit, dass Facebook jene Daten zum Beispiel nicht | fur sein Anzeigengeschaft nutzen darf. "_ | | Roughly translated as: Whatsapp is not allowed to share | personal user data with Facebook for Facebooks own use, for | example Facebook cannot collect data for the purpose of | advertisement (and my guess is any other form of monetization). | Facebook says further down in the article they currently don't | share data between the services for those purposes. | | I also think you're confused about the scope. It's no problem | that WhatsApp uses its own userdata, the problem is WhatsApp | sharing data with Facebook, which is a distinct service. | | https://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/apps/whatsapp-hamburger-date... | thamer wrote: | Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for the details! | amaccuish wrote: | Fantastic news and really ideally the whole purchase should be | reversed (and obviously more ideally never allowed to happen in | the first place) | throwawaysea wrote: | To take this further, we also need to reverse other purchases | like Instagram, YouTube, Twitch, Zenimax, Doubleclick, PA Semi, | and so on. We also need a new vocabulary and new concepts. We | shouldn't rely on traditional notions of monopoly market share | or "consumer harm" to decide when an acquisition/merger/stake | should be allowed. We need a new definition to prevent gigantic | conglomerates with immense market power, and then we need to | enforce that law aggressively, in splitting up existing | companies and scrutinizing future deals. | arcticbull wrote: | Reasonably anticipated future consumer harm sounds like a | good model to me, IMO. | | For instance, if we can reasonably assume an acquisition will | lead to the potential for future harm through accumulation of | power, influence, data, etc, that should be sufficient to | block it. | | Mergers are in and of themselves simply recognizing an | efficiency of scale. It should be possible for a business to | achieve success without that shortcut, broadly speaking. Once | they're big enough already, that is. | | This seems to tie in nicely to the recent narrative that | efficiency is the opposite of resiliency, and that maybe not | all efficiencies are good. | tchalla wrote: | Another Source - | https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-11/facebook-... | | > Johannes Caspar, who heads Hamburg's privacy authority, issued | a three-month emergency ban, prohibiting Facebook from continuing | with the data collection. He also asked a panel of European Union | data regulators to take action and issue a ruling across the | 27-nation bloc. The new WhatsApp terms enabling the data scoop | are invalid because they are intransparent, inconsistent and | overly broad, he said. | humanlion87 wrote: | > Facebook's WhatsApp unit called Caspar's claims "wrong" and | said the order won't stop the roll-out of the new terms. | | I don't understand how Facebook says this order will not stop | the roll-out. Are they implying that the authority has no power | to implement/enforce the ban? | Jonanin wrote: | They incorrectly assumed (like much of the media) that this | update was about sharing data of personal messages with | Facebook, when it is in fact not. | zwaps wrote: | It is, but not yet in the EU. | | It literally says : we will share everything with Facebook | as soon as the EU allows. Right now we do not. But we | might. | | I mean it's written there. | tpush wrote: | Where does it literally say that? | zwaps wrote: | I quote from their website | | ------ | | Today, WhatsApp does not share your personal information | with Facebook to improve your Facebook product | experiences or provide you more relevant Facebook ad | experiences on Facebook. This is a result of discussions | with the Irish Data Protection Commission and other Data | Protection Authorities in Europe. We're always working on | new ways to improve how you experience WhatsApp and the | other Facebook Company Products you use. Should we choose | to share such data with the Facebook Companies for this | purpose in the future, we will only do so when we reach | an understanding with the Irish Data Protection | Commission on a future mechanism to enable such use. | We'll keep you updated on new experiences we offer and | our information practices. | | ------------ | | This is legalese for pretty much what I posted. In | particular, the keep you update here does not necessarily | mean you get to agree to a new privacy policy, as the | current policy does not include a commitment not to share | data (for ads etc) with facebook in the first place. This | statement is deviously placed outside the privacy policy! | | Also further up they say that they associate the whatsapp | profile with any facebook profile in the | household/net/vicinity. To be clear, they do this now. | Not in the future. | zwaps wrote: | Oh just on case you are unsure what will happen with all | this, it's the following: | | In the near future, they will start sharing all that | juicy data with facebook based on some made up precedent, | new technical justification, some claim to pseudonymity, | or discussion with some Irish politician or whatnot. | | After being found out, they will then eventually | apologize, do better next time and pay the fine, which | pales in comparison to the profit gained from that data. | | Just as they are now replying to an order from a data | protection official with: 'Lol nope' | mseri wrote: | CNBC provides [1] links to the original source of the news [2] | | [1]: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/11/facebook-has-been-told-to- | st... [2]: https://datenschutz- | hamburg.de/pressemitteilungen/2021/05/20... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-05-11 23:00 UTC)