[HN Gopher] Show HN: Find Subreddits for Your Niche ___________________________________________________________________ Show HN: Find Subreddits for Your Niche Author : thisissidhant Score : 180 points Date : 2021-05-26 17:59 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.findareddit.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.findareddit.com) | ssivark wrote: | This is very cool! I'd love to know what kind of data inputs you | used for the recommendation engine. | | More generally, I think it would be really great to have | collaborative filtering services for all kinds of interests | (music, movies, books, forums, etc) independent of the mega- | platforms which have significant biases in what content they | peddle (often optimized so keenly to the point of being | adversarial to users). | DeanWormer wrote: | This is a fun idea. I thought of a slightly different spin. | Combine what Million Short does with search results (omits the | top million results to help find things beyond the usual top | results) with Reddit. | | Better discussions happen in the smaller subreddits, so I'd love | a Million Short for Reddit that filters out the top subs and only | leaves the more productive ones. | | https://millionshort.com/ | cjlm wrote: | Also worth a look is this fascinating interactive map of reddit | [0] from Anvaka [1] | | [0] https://anvaka.github.io/map-of-reddit [1] | https://twitter.com/anvaka | me_bx wrote: | Anvaka's subreddit graph tool is also awesome: | | https://anvaka.github.io/sayit/?query=linux | nikaspran wrote: | On a related note, let me shill my side-project: | https://nikas.praninskas.com/suggest-subreddit/ | | It suggests subreddits based on what you're already subscribed | to. | newsbinator wrote: | > An error has occurred | | > Could not calculate similar subreddits, please refresh the | page or try again later | plutonorm wrote: | What I want is a big 5 personality test and test about my | interests. Then I want to be shown where on the internet there | are like minded people interested in what I am interested in. I | want people who are highly agreeable, highly open and totally not | conscientious and who want to discuss philosophy or mathematics | or social change or whatever. Where are my people? Don't you want | to find your people? Build my app for me. I don't have the | time... | ThalesX wrote: | I've been telling my SO for the longest time that I long to | find some similar people, but that must only mean that people | such as myself are also lost on the internet trying to find | their place, so the chance of me meeting myself is rather slim | apart from an one-off HN or Reddit comment. | PaulHoule wrote: | Reddit passed the cultural event horizon some years ago. | | The dominant form on reddit is the "meme" which (unlike joining a | religion or revolutionary party) makes no demand that you | understand what you're copying. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1LpXN4PO8U | | People on the Craiglist forum seem to be "there" more than | redditors are even if I can't figure out how they bypass the | spell checker to mess up simple words like "cow", "dog" and | "pig". | anotha1 wrote: | Great! Reddit search sucks. site:reddit.com ftw. Will you be | adding a search feature? Even just a simple auto-complete with | all the tags you have would be great! | thisissidhant wrote: | I was planning on adding the search, but held it off before i | could validate the need for it. I'm glad you liked it | AnonHP wrote: | Which category does one have to dig into to find subreddits for | social groups that span many topics, say, for women | (r/twoxchromosomes) or something like ask men (r/askmen)? | thisissidhant wrote: | You can check out the "History and Culture" Category. Under | culture subCategory you will find tags that are broad and | relate to the various cultures | uxamanda wrote: | This is cool! Would be nice to have a "last post" date or number | of recent posts. A few I clicked on are dormant. | | (Also very minor, but looks like https://www.reddit.com/r/figma/ | is not a UI/UX subreddit, wasn't sure if there was a place to | submit corrections on the site) | thisissidhant wrote: | Yes i agree, some of the subreddits may be old. Last post will | be a good metric for this. | screye wrote: | This is great for 2 reasons. | | 1. It helps newcomers to reddit find the familiar, popular and | sanitized subs | | 2. None of my prized niche subreddits come up here. The entry | barrier stays high and so does the content quality. | guavaNinja wrote: | Though the first recommendation of it was r/funny | dentemple wrote: | /r/funny is how you teach people about the Unsubscribe button | Archelaos wrote: | Philosophy should have a category of its own. It has only very | little overlap with religion and almost none with spirituality. | More or at least the same with art, reading, writing, education, | history, culture, and science. And it touches most of the other | topics somewhat as well. | atestu wrote: | r/WikiLeaks is "Alt right"? Who does the tagging? | gj0 wrote: | This is really cool ! This solves a genuinely problem. I remember | being stuck at reddit search for long hours while trying to find | the perfect subreddit for posting some content. | | Thanks for this :) | thisissidhant wrote: | Glad you liked it :) | WORMS_EAT_WORMS wrote: | This is great and I wish this mentality was pushed earlier on | reddit. | | There was a golden era of reddit right before the great Digg | migration. Excellent comments, diverse opinions, and really great | back and forth being shared of individual's experiences in almost | every single subreddit. | | Today, it's definitely harder to find good commentary and | exchange. It's also super heavily astroturfed by political groups | in all the subreddits (on both sides) to try to influence the | general groupthink narrative/consensus. It's so disgustingly | obvious but doesn't seem to be an issue for the team. | | Maybe I am just getting old. I guess what I'm try to say is | _nothing_ will beat simply Google searching a topic and typing | "reddit" afterwards to query some super insightful and awesome 5+ | year old forum post on whatever the content is. | grawprog wrote: | >Today, it's definitely harder to find good commentary and | exchange. It's also super heavily astroturfed by political | groups in all the subreddits | | I've found a lot of hobby specific subreddits or ones on niche | topics tend to avoid that. Also, less popular niches or hobbies | i've noticed tend to have more people that are actually | interested in having decent conversations about said topics or | hobbies. | cpach wrote: | Indeed! | | Example: The other day I had a question about Exchange Server | client compatibility. I wanted a discussion about pros and | cons, i.e. not a good fit for Stack Exchange since there's no | obviously correct answer. So I googled for [?]exchange server | subreddit[?]. And of course, there was an Exchange Server | subreddit. Asked the question there and got lots of high- | quality answers, zero bullshit. That's Reddit at it's best. | | PS. In order to save one's sanity, I encourage all redditors | to use https://old.reddit.com/ exclusively. | mdoms wrote: | I have never found a hobby subreddit worth following. If I | look at my hobbies like /r/simracing /r/gardening /r/welding | /r/motorcycles an overwhelming (in the literal sense) number | of posts are just lazy image posts of (in order of listed | subs) a sim racing rig, a pile of vegetables, a nice bead and | a motorcycle. A picture of an ordinary part of a hobby is not | conducive to meaningful conversations on the hobby. | | Additionally I have found virtually all hobby subreddits are | dominated by newbies to the hobby. This is especially | pronounced on /r/motorcycles but appears to be general. Hobby | subs are places where newbies hear newbies give advice and | then pass that advice on to other newbies as if they were | experienced. | | I keep seeing people say that niche hobby subs still have | worthwhile discussions but I have yet to actually see this. | grawprog wrote: | Like i said, less popular topics and hobbies tend to have | higher quality discussions. Gardening, welding and | motorcycles are pretty popular topics. | | I tried looking around for a decent motorcycle sub, you're | right that one lacks some alternatives. For gardening, | maybe try more specific subs like for your local area or a | specific kind of gardening, flowers or vegetables or | whatever, just something more specific and niche than just | gardening. | | For welding again, similar idea, look for more specific | less general welding related topics that may have subs | devoted to them. | | It may not work for all topics but generally i've found, | the more specific and niche you get, the. better chance | you'll find something decent. | | It's still just a chance, you may or may not be able to | find what you're looking for, but this is generally what | i've found. | dentemple wrote: | It probably depends on the hobby. | | /r/anime and /r/manga are pretty great when it comes to | discussing active releases. | joshlemer wrote: | Is there a better place you go for your hobbies them, or do | you just google "<my hobby> forum" to find the best | discussion boards for each topic individually? | MattRix wrote: | Not OP, but one modern option is Discord servers. There | are lots of them these days on all kinds of topics. | mdoms wrote: | Forums are dead so for modern hobbies like simracing I | haven't found anything. I work on old cars so there are | still great forums for that stuff, and gardening I have | given up on online discussion content - it's mostly | crappy sponsored content trying to sell you bullshit. | Gardening content is best consumed in books and YouTube | and ignore online discussion. | MattRix wrote: | I just mentioned it in another comment but Discord | servers are one of the newest types of communities | popping up (especially for younger folks, but they can be | for people of any age). For example, here's one about | gardening: https://discord.gg/D2kCbGY | mdoms wrote: | This is the worst possible outcome for hobby content. At | least forum/reddit threads are searchable on the open web | and likely to remain available at least for a while. | silicon2401 wrote: | The politicization and trend towards political correctness on | reddit has been a huge part of its decline. It's rare now to | find places where one can simply discuss topics with | objectivity and curiosity instead of threads revolving around | virtue signaling or demonization of the 'other side' | antris wrote: | Sure, nobody likes political correctness but without any | controls on content on a public forum as a part of a ToS, | nazis and other people who are desperate to express their | hate, and even break the law and recruit others will | eventually find it and spam the hell out of it. 4chan is a | perfect example of what happens to an actually occasionally | funny place that allows any kind of discussion "just for | lulz". It's been a cesspool and barely anyone remembers how | it was before the nazis came in. It's just how it works when | the forum is public and there's no moderation. If you want | good discussion without limits, I suggest joining smaller | communities that are harder to flood in this way, or talk to | people you know in real life. | 1337biz wrote: | Reddit has become a long-form of Twitter. An endless circle | of pandering to the same claqueurs. It is so tedious. | | My time spent on Reddit has dropped massively over the last | months. And I moved back to 4chan. It is so refreshing to | see raw and uncensored communication. Even if 4chan often | borders on insanity, it feels so much more honest and real | than the cleansed cliques of sameness. | tryonenow wrote: | >nazis and other people who are desperate to express their | hate, and even break the law and recruit others will | eventually find it and spam the hell out of it. 4chan is a | perfect example of what happens to an actually occasionally | funny place that allows any kind of discussion "just for | lulz". | | No, the problem is that right of center posts and comments | are banned and cheaply and falsely dismissed as "nazi" | ideology. The issue is exacerbated with the heavily | politicized moderation. It's a self reinforcing bubble at | this point. | | There is far more diverse discussion on 4chan. You may get | shouted down, but you won't be banned or downvoted into | oblivion for dissenting. I think it's far more telling that | unmoderated forums tend to lean right - it speaks to the | authoritarianism that has consumed the left, and pervasive | control that progressives have across the internet. When | you ban both far right extremism _and_ right of center | opinions, the people are forced to congregate in the select | few alternative forums that are not politicized through | moderation. It 's also seems that leftist opinions can only | flourish through heavy handed moderation and community | gatekeeping. Reddit is just one example. Take a look at | Wikipedia, or stackexhange, and the kind of sources that | are permitted. Frankly, the "nazi" right is more open- | minded at this point than the left, because leftist forums | (and in person groups) tend to suppress dissenting ideas, | to the degree that people on these moderated forums are | simply not exposed to alternative ideas, which are far more | nuanced than the trivial -isms that they are universally | slandered with. | | Polarization in the US is thusly driven primarily by left | wing authoritarianism, which uses the paradox of | intolerance as an excuse to be intolerant, assigning guilt | to right of center opinions by tenuous assocation. | armchairhacker wrote: | I completely agree with you, we need content moderation and | some political beliefs are just toxic. | | But Reddit just takes it to the absurd: | | - Automods which remove posts which simply contain certain | words (e.g. "coronavirus", apparently because too many | covid deniers). I get trying to restrict covid | misinformation, but I'm not even exaggerating, they remove | _anything_ discussing covid even if it 's supporting. | | - Mods removing some posts seemingly at random (seem using | sites like reveddit.com). These posts really don't involve | anything controversial at all and I can't understand why | they were removed. | | - Automods which ban you simply for posting in certain | subreddits. And not radical ones, ones like | r/PoliticalCompassMemes or r/watchredditdie. Btw, check out | r/watchredditdie yourself to see more issues | | Another issue is that Redditors in top subreddits tend to | add politics to pretty much anything. Like, there is a | highly upvoted post in r/nextfuckinglevel (a subreddit | designed for e.g. people running ultra-marathons or doing | crazy gymnastics or magic tricks) that is literally just a | guy in his 40s ranting about how the U.S. government is | fucked. And yeah, I agree the US government is pretty bad, | but I don't need to hear about it in every single subreddit | or r/AskReddit thread. | atweiden wrote: | Social bookmarking site moderation is in need of an | overhaul. Moderators have turned into gatekeepers who | can't be unseated. | | I'm dreaming of an "old Reddit"/HN-esque discussion board | where moderation policies are opt-in. E.g. submit a | thread to /r/bayarea, users compete to moderate e.g. | ban/censor content. Users "follow" moderators to opt-in | to their moderation policies. Basically | upvoting/downvoting but for moderation itself. | | Even better if a user's moderation policies could be | forked and lightly edited. I even think there's room for | a learning curve here, given how thoroughly social | bookmarking sites have trounced traditional media. | handoflixue wrote: | I think the big problem with this is that very few people | actually want to be moderators, and the people who do | want the position are often least suited for it. | | Smaller communities can rely on simple upvote/downvote, | possibly with some intelligent logic to notice who you | tend to agree with - I think Slashdot was primarily this? | | But past a certain scale, just dealing with spam is a | huge deal. Plus you need 24/7 coverage, and you want mods | to be reasonably responsive. Assuming each person can put | in 42 hours/week of moderation that still means you need | four moderators. | | And of course you need a default for people who have just | arrived at the site, so that they're not buried in spam | or attacked by trolls on their first post. | daptaq wrote: | Sounds to me like internet fora inevitably fail, either | suffering under over- or under-regulation. People usually | act as though one of the two solutions could fix the | problem, but having seen both, I cannot prefer either. The | medium is broken. | hnnnnnnng wrote: | Lmao | godelski wrote: | I think a big issue is inflation. As we have more users a niche | forum turns into a more general forum. There's some good and | bad to this. This has even happened on HN. But there's another | problem. If a forum is too small then it doesn't serve its | purpose of connecting the right people. I wonder if anyone | knows the optimal size/range, or if such a metric exists (under | certain criteria of course). | caddemon wrote: | This is what makes subreddits such a good idea IMO. | Theoretically Reddit can be a massive community, while each | subreddit can still remain niche. Then people can be | connected to others across a number of topics without | "polluting" spaces they are not interested in. | | Of course if you are interested in discussing a broad or | popular topic like politics or the NBA, you will probably | have to actually just find a smaller group to get higher | quality discussion. There's not really a way around the | inflation issue in those subreddits, as far as I can tell. | | The other problem is that Reddit seems to increasingly | emphasize the generic popular subreddits in its UI and how | the site is marketed/presented. There are still good, active | subreddits for certain hobbies and communities, but I do | worry that the more Reddit is viewed as just another large | social media site, the fewer such subreddits there will be. | godelski wrote: | I think that the problem is that there's a fractal nature | to this though. It then makes discoverability a much more | complex problem as inflation continues. | ItsMonkk wrote: | The core problem with Reddit is that it calls them | communities, but for 99% of the subreddits the name of | the subreddit is based on the content, not the people. | This leads Reddit into these fractal content | relationships where you can only really discuss the | things that have the goldilocks level of popularity. | Looking to get some new headphones and aren't an | audiophile? Sorry, headphones are to popular and the | niche subreddit is to specific to you. | | Hacker News on the other hand is based on Hackers, it's | about the people. The topics are broad. When a new thing | comes into existence that hackers are interested in, we | don't have to move to a new place where maybe most of us | don't realize it exists, we discuss it here and introduce | it to others here. That's the correct view. | | But the cause of the problem that reddit faces is | population size. We want a small town community, not a | community the size of New York City, where people are | aggressive because they know they won't see that random | person again. It's about seeing the same name, and treat | those names with dignity. It's about caring about the | people in the community. | | So Hacker News in time will either deal with this problem | or run into the same issue that large subreddits face. | Once new users start learning behavior from other new | users, there's no coming back from that. Eternal | September is coming. I hope a resolution is discovered, | because I really like it here. | newman8r wrote: | Dunbar's Number [1] puts a number of 150 as an upper limit | for effective groups where everyone knows eachother - but | these would presumably be active users, and it's not | necessarily directly applicable to internet forums (but from | my experience with irc and other communities, it does make | some sense). I've been trying to start groups like this | myself, but it isn't easy. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number | tizzy wrote: | > nothing will beat simply Google searching a topic and typing | "reddit" afterwards | | This is so true and I'm glad I'm not the only one who does | this. I also do this with "forum" at the end of each search | nowadays. There's something very truthful about these opinions | and discussions that I find hard to describe. I think I trust | these opinions more because they tend to speak from their own | experience which is not always one of expertise, but rather of | someone like me. | | When deciding on getting x vs y, a Reddit post from 5 years ago | with even just 10 upvotes suggesting x gives me way more | confidence than the majority of reviews. | philwelch wrote: | > Today, it's definitely harder to find good commentary and | exchange. It's also super heavily astroturfed by political | groups in all the subreddits (on both sides) to try to | influence the general groupthink narrative/consensus. It's so | disgustingly obvious but doesn't seem to be an issue for the | team. | | The only real solution for this is the same as any other social | media, or even real life: accept that people live in non- | overlapping bubbles and hang out in the bubbles you're | comfortable with or curious about. | fnord77 wrote: | not to mention marketing all over subreddits and moderators | with agendas. it's just so corrupt and greasy | vmception wrote: | Just unfollow all the default subreddits and follow ones | tailored to you | | Also its all sides astroturfing because there are more than two | thomastjeffery wrote: | > I guess what I'm try to say is nothing will beat simply | Google searching a topic and typing "reddit" afterwards to | query some super insightful and awesome 5+ year old forum post | on whatever the content is. | | Better yet, use site:reddit.com | | Reddit's search really needs some work. It's practically | useless for me unless I am using old.reddit.com/. | | > There was a golden era of reddit right before the great Digg | migration. Excellent comments, diverse opinions, and really | great back and forth being shared of individual's experiences | in almost every single subreddit. | | That golden era is still happening. It's just hidden under a | bunch of signal noise. | | It helps to take all of the popular subreddits out of your feed | and only join more niche ones. | | The reality is that _humanity in general_ is experiencing the | same "golden era" hidden behind a high noise to signal ratio. | There's only so much we can do to filter through it. | stingraycharles wrote: | > Reddit's search really needs some work. It's practically | useless for me unless I am using old.reddit.com/. | | I always thought that "Reddit search is bad" is pretty much | as old as Reddit itself. I don't think they ever seriously | invested in that, for whatever reason. | | Here's a post from 8y ago where people were already accepting | that it has been like that forever, and it hasn't changed a | lot ever since. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1 | 46gop/why_does_... | TeMPOraL wrote: | I haven't seen a single social media or messaging platform | where search didn't suck. Reddit search was bad, after | redesign it's just hot garbage. Messenger search is | unreliable and near-useless. Facebook search only worked | well for the brief moment when they introduced "graph | search", but that got quickly killed due to popular | outrage. HN's bolted-on Algolia search is the least bad | I've seen. And let's not even talk about Twitter, Instagram | or Slack. | | I'd go as far as saying that search features are being | underdeveloped on purpose - perhaps they allow usage | patterns that service owners don't like. | | But then, Mastodon's search is even worse than Twitter, and | that project has no incentive to disenfranchise their | users. So I'm honestly confused about all this. | tsian2 wrote: | This lead me to believe that search must really hard to | implement, but then a few days of getting into Sphinx | convinced me otherwise. It's kind of like the big sites | where you have to load the whole video before it'll start | playing (no HTTP partials). They could do better, they | just don't. | medstrom wrote: | Um. Example of sites where you have to load the whole | video? I've never seen that in my life (I'm 29). | na85 wrote: | I'm only 35 and I remember this. It was quite common | before YouTube. | lacksconfidence wrote: | In my experience search is really easy to implement. Good | search, across a large dataset, is a never ending money | pit. | tshaddox wrote: | Slack's search is excellent for me. I use it probably at | least once a week to find something important for work. | Granted, I'm usually searching for things that I know | will be an exact substring match of the message I'm | looking for, but for that it works great for me. | mooreds wrote: | As long as we're piling on about search, here are my two | least favorite site searches: * meetup | * AWS docs | | Going straight to google for both of these nets better | results 99% of the time. | | It's probably a cycle at this point. More people use | google (or other general search), so these sites optimize | for them, rather than invest in the site search | experience. General search engines are where the users | are coming from. | stingraycharles wrote: | I think it's a combination of "search is hard" and "witty | comments / titles make it even harder to search for". | | I'd argue most of these sites would be far better off | with just using Algolia or Google as their main search | engine and calling it a day. | lacksconfidence wrote: | > I don't think they ever seriously invested in that, for | whatever reason. | | They have recently invested in it, switching to | lucidworks[1] a few years ago. Sadly i don't think it | changed anyones opinion of reddit search, but it might have | saved them some infrastructure cost. | | [1] https://lucidworks.com/customers/reddit/ | wfawejoiweoif wrote: | "site:reddit.com" is significantly more burdensome to type | than "reddit", particularly on phone keyboards. | | I use DDG, which simply doesn't handle just putting "reddit" | at the end of things very well compared to google, and no | mobile keyboard makes typing "site:reddit.com" easy given the | punctuation and the auto-inserted spaces, so I typically just | end up doing "reddit g!" to deal with it and just use google. | Weebs wrote: | > There was a golden era of reddit right before the great Digg | migration | | I've been longing for this lately. Even the more interest | specific subreddits have gotten noticeably worse and borderline | toxic. It feels like it's shifted from a culture of sharing and | discussing niche topics or current events with some goofy humor | to a slightly more dignified YouTube comment section | thisissidhant wrote: | I agree. Google Search is much much better. I personally built | the list using this way along with other list already created. | | My idea is to create a catalogue of a lot of subreddits for | people to navigate well | WORMS_EAT_WORMS wrote: | I love how you laid this out. It's very nicely done. | | I think if there was also a way to show and filter by comment | activity/frequency/subscribers too (or some other creative | metric) beyond the subreddit title it would go miles. | thisissidhant wrote: | This is a really good idea. I will collect more data points | definitely ! | salmo wrote: | I think this is the lifecycle of all 'nerd' sites. Slashdot | went this way, Digg, Reddit, and we're seeing it here. | | It starts with insightful stuff, knowledgeable people, real | discourse. Reddit may have been special because at the time the | community also prided itself on kindness. | | But then 'nerds' go from people who have insight and opinions | on esoteric topics, to people that like Marvel universe movies. | Basically it gets popular and then it's no longer a niche | group. | | I think this happens with social media and "the kids" as well. | As soon as your mom is on it, it's dead and you move on to the | next one. | | But we see it now. It's gotten to where most of the time I have | to collapse the first few threads because they turn into fanboy | arguments (pro/anti-apple, intel vs. AMD, copyleft vs liberal | OSS licenses, etc, etc.). | door101 wrote: | > There was a golden era of reddit right before the great Digg | migration. | | People say this, but this is also when Reddit was the largest | place for underage "softcore" pornography on the internet. It | was one of the first things you saw when you google searched | "reddit" | kart23 wrote: | reddit is still like half porn. It was so bad they stopped | showing NSFW content on r/all, before the change if you | sorted by new, literally half the posts were marked NSFW. | | https://old.reddit.com/r/changelog/comments/lhnvok/removing_. | .. | jcims wrote: | Generally avoiding subreddits with more than 100k members is | the way to find decent content. | | For really slow subreddits, just tack /comments on to the | subreddit URL to get a listing of most recent comments instead | of posts. | tyrust wrote: | >It's also super heavily astroturfed by political groups in all | the subreddits (on both sides) to try to influence the general | groupthink narrative/consensus. It's so disgustingly obvious | but doesn't seem to be an issue for the team. | | I've used reddit for 10 years. I heard this claim before and | disagree (still [0]). I subscribe to a couple dozen subreddits, | some of which are fairly large (/r/cooking, /r/games, | /r/programming), and see pretty much nothing off-topic or | political (let alone astroturfing). The most I've seen is a | sticky or a blackout for a non-related issue. Those are rare | enough that I don't think an average user is meaningfully | impacted by it, whether or not you agree with the issue being | discussed. | | [0] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27120055 | workethics wrote: | > I've used reddit for 10 years. | | I believe that's why you think that. I feel that reddit | started to go downhill after 2011, which was 10 years ago. So | if that's when you joined you wouldn't have experienced what | it was like before to feel that way. | tyrust wrote: | I mean, the site hasn't been unchanged over that history. | I've left many subreddits as they became memed-out messes. | | Overall, I find that there are plenty of subreddits with | focused discussion and decent moderation. | | I'd be interested in what you refer to as the entirety of | the site going "downhill". You haven't really given me much | to reply to in this comment. | [deleted] | Jorengarenar wrote: | > I subscribe to a couple dozen subreddits, some of which are | fairly large (/r/cooking, /r/games, /r/programming), and see | pretty much nothing off-topic or political | | Well, that's because those have specific topic. It's hard to | make something political about cooking. Bit easier in case of | gaming (as games being cultural work can be political | commentary), I've seen some political discourses on | r/programming as well. | | But on r/all you will find post from more political | subreddits (r/WhitePeopleTwitter, r/BlackPeopleTwitter, | r/TwoXChromosomes, r/MurderedByWords, r/PoliticalCompassMemes | etc.) regularly. For better of worse the content consist | mostly of post from more left side of political spectrum, | although it creates and echo chamber and you will be highly | criticized if you try to raise any concerns. | | I consider to be more of the progressive side, but sometimes | when I see some post I have thoughts "wait, this one actually | starts to sound like communism again". | CallMeMarc wrote: | Nice, just found a bunch of my old favorite subreddits I totally | forgot about since switching from the Reddit mobile app to | Apollo. Thanks! | thisissidhant wrote: | Awesome :) | duxup wrote: | Even community topics seem like 'not enough' of a filter on | reddit. | | I want a 'good' community, not just any 'community'. | | Like is a sub about a semi competitive video game a bunch of try | hards who are busy sneering at everyone's stats? | | Or is it easy going? | | Or is it full of memes / funny pics? | | Are there even any active mods on the sub? | | Just a topic doesn't seem like enough of a filter. | lettergram wrote: | I've been thinking a while about making a social media site that | doesn't have boards, subreddits, channels, pages, etc | | Instead it would be almost like a stream of consciousness where | the system learns your interests and expertise and basically | builds a board for you with stories from different topics. Could | even be across multiple sites. | | It would use something like this: https://insideropinion.com/ | TchoBeer wrote: | Like Tiktok | nkrisc wrote: | Maybe my definition of a "niche" subreddit is different, but | these just look like broad, generally popular categories. | | Like click Sports and Games and the top on is... /r/sports? Sure, | it's relevant, but is it niche? I don't really see how this is | much better than just typing "$myInterest reddit" into a search | engine. | | Unless I'm missing something, I just don't see how this helps my | find a subreddit for my niche. | thisissidhant wrote: | You can find a niche by selecting a category from the left | sidebar. Once you select a category, you see tags related to it | on the top screen. | | For sports these are - Board games, billiards, American | football martial arts etc to name a few. | | I guess you didn't explored the category. You may find it | useful, try it out :) | flenserboy wrote: | Reddit has some great individual boards, but it's not always easy | to find them. This site, as well as others | (https://anvaka.github.io/sayit/ comes to mind), is a nice start | on making them more discoverable. | | Reddit also brings to mind the old statement on UNIX - "Those who | do not understand USENET are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." | There will always be room for something like USENET (part of the | pre-web days I miss), and Reddit is, sadly, what we have right | now. | samirillian wrote: | I feel like a good top level category would be fan clubs or | similar, subreddits for podcasts, tv shows, etc. | lt wrote: | What I did to improve my reddit experience: | | 1. unsubscribe to all the big default subreddits, like askreddit, | funny, etc (don't worry, you can still check them out if you | want). | | 2. go to r/all and use the filter feature to block the most | annoying content or popular stuff that you absolutely don't care | about. I blocked politics subreddits, some memes, anime, | communities for popular youtubers, some of the worse default | ones. Just look at the current /r/all listing and block whatever | you don't care about that appears in the first few pages, refresh | and do it again a few times. I go back every once in a while to | repeat the process. | | 3. subscribe to specific things you care about. smaller | communities are better, some of the large ones are better | moderated than others. | | 4. favorite a few (3-4) subreddits that are about things I want | to check often. | | My home feed is mostly tailored to my interests, even if there's | some fluff. Smaller subreddits I don't check often and appear | there. Then I check my favorite subreddits for specific things, | and there's r/all for the popular stuff. | | I find that general topics like tech, music, sports are usually | bad, but more specific, not necessarily niche, are better (a sub | about a specific framework, maybe, or about your hometown, | favorite band, or favorite team). Moderation style helps a lot. | user00012-ab wrote: | People keep saying how great Reddit is, but I tried signing up to | a bunch of my "Niches" and all the posts where just low quality | junk; for example every other post in the 3dprinting subreddit is | just "MY FIRST PRINT!" or "I BOUGHT A THING!" and for some reason | people think it's cute so they upvote it. EDC? here is another | picture of my gun! Tech reddit; "here is a link to a medium post | that you can't see unless you subscribe!". | | And the rest of the posts are just people re-asking the same | questions over and over because they can't be bothered to search. | | Reddit is just a fire hose of low quality content. | xeromal wrote: | That's a pretty broad brush. Check out /r/askscience and | /r/askhistorians for some heavily moderated subreddits. Not all | need that level but they produce almost all quality posts. | 1_player wrote: | That's the exception that proves the rule. /r/askscience and | /r/askhistorians have heavy handed moderation to keep quality | much higher than the rest of Reddit. | | I don't know how one can disagree with the fact that most of | Reddit is quick engagement posts (images, memes, even if they | don't fit the subreddit) and witty one liners voted to the | top. There's good stuff, sure, the point is that it's hidden | behind a ton of crap. | xeromal wrote: | Sounds just like the internet to me though. Gotta scrounge | for treasure but it's worth it. | caddemon wrote: | Yeah I'm not sure if there is an "ask" style subreddit for 3D | printing, but IME the ask subreddits are a good way to get | quality content on a broader academic topic. | | There may also be a sidebar on a given sub with more specific | related subreddits listed out. These can sometimes be more | technical (for example there is a subreddit specific to | breaking down NFL plays) or sometimes they are just a way to | get a more specific viewpoint (I like to check out both | teams' subreddits after some controversy happens, neither | side is usually level headed but then you at least get both | sides of the story). | frakkingcylons wrote: | Yeah this annoys me to no end. I only subscribe to subreddits | which have strict moderation. Even those subreddits really | struggle to keep up with removing low effort comments because | there's too many. | | The cooking subreddit is somewhat okay. They have a no image | post rule and that is pretty effective just on its own. | godelski wrote: | I think this is inflation. There's plenty of subreddits that | were great for awhile then just became over run with stuff like | that. I think because a lot of people are more casual members | and just casually upvote a lot. But to be honest, there's still | not that much great material in the first place. Maybe there's | a way to separate out these groups. E.g. noobs and technical | members. These people have different needs and wants. Technical | members should help noobs (wizards don't exist without noobs) | but maybe all technical members don't want to do that and only | want to see what other technical users are doing. A niche topic | stops being niche when it gains too many users and I think that | harms the community when members are looking for said niche | community. | Kye wrote: | Most communities have a related subreddit where that sort of | stuff is banned, but finding it usually requires spending | enough time reading to see a mention 20 levels deep in an off- | topic thread near the bottom. You might get lucky with the | subreddit's wiki or sidebar if it has one. | | The 3dprinting subreddit's sidebar links to this: | https://old.reddit.com/user/Devtholt/m/3d_printing/ | dougmwne wrote: | It can depend on the subreddit, but you are mostly right. The | moderation makes a big difference and it's all volunteer, at | least for niche subs. I have a small handful I subscribe to and | check regularly. Mostly I Google for reddit threads when I'm | interested in a topic since you'll generally end up with a | quality thread on almost any imaginable topic. | philwelch wrote: | YMMV. Subreddits still need good moderators to succeed. | | For me, the sweet spot is: | | 1. If I want to buy a $PRODUCT, I find the subreddit for | enthusiasts of $PRODUCT and see if they have a wiki or a | stickied post or a sidebar that has accumulated recommendations | and/or advice. | | 2. Some subreddits are more about the stickied general | discussion thread than the rest of the subreddit. | | 3. There are lots of subreddits, and many of them were started | specifically out of some grievance with a different subreddit. | Are you sure there isn't a "EDC-but-no-guns" subreddit, if | that's what you really wanted? | covercash wrote: | Those topics are still too generalized which tends to indicate | the sub has a lot of casual and beginner members. Larger | communities also mean they're a target for low quality/repost | material that accounts can use to significantly increase karma | in a short amount of time. | | If you check the sidebars, you can usually find more niche | related subreddits. r/3Dprinting actually made a multireddit | with all of the subs that relate to them: | https://old.reddit.com/user/Devtholt/m/3d_printing?utm_sourc... | fouric wrote: | The _idea_ for this service is neat! However... | | Given the increasingly hostile behavior of Reddit's mods over the | past few years, I would prefer a service that searches for _non- | Reddit_ subReddit-like-things. I don 't want to feed the new | corporate monster that Reddit is becoming - I would rather join a | new community that still has actual values. | meristem wrote: | I see the category list...where would "Beauty" or "Cars" be | listed? | thisissidhant wrote: | > if you checked it on the mobile screen, you will see a | horizontal scrollable category list, Along with all Categories, | there is a category for Fashion. There you will find subreddits | related to Beauty. | TeeMassive wrote: | /r/DataHoarders really hasn't disappointed me so far. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-05-26 23:00 UTC)