[HN Gopher] Show HN: An experimental, people-powered search engine ___________________________________________________________________ Show HN: An experimental, people-powered search engine Author : zeeshanqureshi Score : 97 points Date : 2021-05-28 15:42 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (ninfex.com) (TXT) w3m dump (ninfex.com) | zeeshanqureshi wrote: | Hi HN, I'm the creator of Ninfex. | | I've been unhappy with the inconsistent quality of web search | results for quite some time now. Wanting to do something about | this for myself, I started experimenting with the way I save my | notes/bookmarks. | | In all of my trials, two things seemed to work more than all | others and proved to be useful in the long term. One: saving my | good search result URLs. Two: saving links to discussions on | those URLs from Reddit, HN, Lobsters, etc. because in my opinion, | community feedback is a (relatively) better proxy for URL | quality. | | This combined with the Apple notes search feature became a very | simple but effective personal index. For the main topics that | interest me, I often found myself searching my index before | searching the web. Once this setup started working well for me, I | thought it was probably time to add a feature which lets users | vote on URLs and host a version of this online, so others can | both contribute to and benefit from it. | | With that in mind, I started speaking to more people who were | unhappy with the current state of search. Turns out the most | common workaround people use is restricting results to | communities (mostly reddit) either by just appending the name or | using site: operator (example - bone conduction headphones | reddit). This was further confirmation that the so-called "power | users" had already moved on to relying on using communities as a | proxy for their search results. | | And so I built a basic version of Ninfex with all those features: | community-curated index, votable urls, forum links and search. | It's an early stage prototype and I'm slowly populating the index | with URLs from my personal wiki. | | I look forward to your feedback and I'm open to all kinds of | suggestions. | Grimm1 wrote: | This is awesome, we were doing the same thing for a bit at | first but ultimately moved away from it in favor of focusing on | a product more in our wheel house, but I think this has a lot | of potential to be very big. Very much rooting for you! | | One thought we had that was different was to let users create | communities but auto populate the communities with links that | we've crawled, to solve the link gaming issue. And then let | them choose how things would be ranked and curate the links we | auto populated. | duncanwerner wrote: | This looks very much like the old site del.icio.us (which was | bought by yahoo and discarded). Don't bother going there but | see [wikipedia][1]. | | The trick there was that it was originally a "personal | bookmarking" service, so there was a selfish reason for | individual users to submit + curate links. Search got layered | on top later. | | [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delicious_(website) | zeeshanqureshi wrote: | Just read through the features of del.icio.us on wikipedia, | you are right about the overlaps. | | I suspect that coupling community + search from the start, | might result in different outcomes (both positive and | negative) as opposed to say just community. | | Take reddit for example, it's all about the community, the | search is abysmal. But it's fun to imagine what if reddit was | mainly about search and the community was a bonus. Surely a | balance needs to be struck. | searchnit wrote: | Interesting project. | | One UI nit: | | I clicked on Mathematics and the top submission at the time | was: https://ninfex.com/item?id=sVfpxepq4rNQ | | The search UI says: "5 days ago." | | I thought it sounded odd since I missed the discussion here 5 | days ago and clicked through to discover the link leads to an | HN discussion from 2014. | | So, that "5 days ago" refers to when it was "submitted" to | Ninfex instead of any relevant time information on the actual | submitted material. | | Felt a bit misled, and finding relevant current information | over higher ranked older material is a painpoint for me in | other search products. | | Happens when I am searching for information on a library and | the most popular hits refer to information from years ago and | the library from multiple major versions ago. Sometimes the | answers are incompatible with the current state of the library | and its API. | | These are different issues, but they feel orthogonal. | zeeshanqureshi wrote: | These are a valid issues that I will certainly resolve, | thanks for pointing them out. | kieckerjan wrote: | I like the idea very much. First question that comes to mind | though is: how gameable is this system? | zeeshanqureshi wrote: | Thanks for the feedback. Honestly, I'm not very sure myself | and I'll have to wait and see. The votes could be gamed | perhaps (multiple accounts etc.), but I could restrict voting | capabilities to say, email/phone verified accounts, aged | accounts or minimum karma (or a combination of all those). | Like I said, we'll have to see how it evolves. | meowster wrote: | Aged accounts won't stop anything, and Karma probably won't | stop anything (afterall a person can buy karma-farmed | reddit accounts), and I'm not going to give a phone number | to try the service out. I hope you figure it out, and I | wish you success. | puttycat wrote: | Maybe it is just me, but "people-powered search engine" made me | think the search queries are sent to humans who look for an | answer for you, like an operator. | zeeshanqureshi wrote: | People-powered as in user submissions, votes. | | Sorry to disappoint you :) | ravenstine wrote: | Remember ChaCha? It was basically that, but you could also do | queries via SMS. | | https://web.archive.org/web/20100428182234/http://www.chacha... | | Now it's a generic Chinese domain parking page: | | https://chacha.com | kevincox wrote: | While I love the concept it seems somewhat flawed. If every URL | needs to be manually submitted it is far easier for spammers than | actual users. Especially if you need a handful of form URLs, is | this intended for readers or authors? Because a reader likely | just wants to see it or post it on their favourite form, I can't | see them going around to a handful. If it is expected that the | author does it than that is somewhat encouraging spamming forms. | | That being said I like the idea, maybe submission could be made | easier with a browser extension? Or you could crawl popular form | feeds and become a sort of form aggregator as a form of crawling. | | On the other hand how is this different than Reddit? You are | basically aggregating links, except instead of providing a form | you are linking to multiple forms. I'm not sure if that is better | or just an inconvenience. Of course maybe just providing a | functional search is enough to distinguish you from Reddit. | ksangeelee wrote: | I wrote a browser extension that could be used or adapted for | this purpose. | | https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/send-tab-url/ | | The description contains a link to the source code. | zeeshanqureshi wrote: | Thanks for the feedback. The forum URLs aren't mandatory. But | they do add value to search results that are either pages or | blogs. It is hard to illustrate that value with example search | queries. I hope that changes with time and a larger, more | diverse index. | akomtu wrote: | The idea has been floating in the air for quite a while and I | agree that something like this is really needed. What I'd | personally want to see is a network of anon users hand picking | interesting pages with a search and a news feed on top of that. | I'd hand pick all these users and kick out anyone who clutters my | feed with junk pages. Vouching for pages should be as easy as | clicking the FB like button (which is blocked by my uBO), ideally | without JS. Later, when this thing earns some trust, I'd install | a browser extension. It should be easy to change the anon userids | while optionally retaining the network I've been subscribed too. | Saving the network can be as simple as copying userids in my | list, maybe with some annotations. It should be easy to share my | id and discover others, e.g. I came across an interesting page on | Wikipedia, saw that mr4123 liked it and added that id to my list. | I may want to have multiple userids with different type of pages | that I wouldn't want to mix together. I'd pay $5/mo for that, | maybe more if I notice the network brings interesting stuff I | wouldn't find myself. From a higher level, such service has sound | economic value: instead of hundred people spending an hour to | find something, the service lets everyone except one to save that | one hour. That's why people come to HN, after all. | ibraheemdev wrote: | This is a very promising idea, thanks for making this! I was just | wondering if you were planning on making the site open source, or | will this a commercial, closed-source product, or somewhere in | between? Not pressuring you into open sourcing it - it can be a | lot of extra work - just wanted to know your eventual plan. | zeeshanqureshi wrote: | Thank you for the feedback. I haven't really thought about it | yet. Too early to tell if this has legs. | altcognito wrote: | Hey, it's dmoz? I like this user focused version, not good for | search, but good for browsing. An adjunct to Wikipedia. Probably | need a lot of guidelines as to what is acceptable. | mech422 wrote: | First thing I thought too... "Someone's rebuilding DMOZ?" | zeeshanqureshi wrote: | Dmoz and other directories of old were (rigid?) pre-defined | category based classifications of urls. I don't intend to | replicate that. | | Though you may be right about certain features being similar. | For now, everything that anyone finds interesting is | acceptable. | throwamon wrote: | This is very similar to something I envision but am too | lazy/unknowledgeable to implement, so I wish you lots of success. | | What about adding a functionality to Ninfex so it automatically | includes links to posts on well-known communities such as HN and | Reddit that link the URL submitted by the user? There's a Chrome | extension called Kiwi Conversations that does something like | this: | | https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/kiwi-conversations... | atweiden wrote: | Great idea. Reminds me of a previous HN comment [1]: | How to build the next Google: all good results these days are | within communities, and Google search has become useless | for most of these searches. So don't build a | search engine: build a "rotten tomatoes for X" where the | sources for each X are "the top N | subreddits/communities/editorial-sites/forums for X". | | I'd be curious to know how you plan on covering costs. | | [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24714546 | geocrasher wrote: | Reminds me of DMOZ. https://dmoz-odp.org/ | | What is it that makes this a _search_ engine, though? | quickthrower2 wrote: | I think it's pretty much the same concept. Blast from the past | CA0DA wrote: | similar to https://diff.blog or https://wiby.me ? | | Edit: fixed url | zeeshanqureshi wrote: | The second one is a parked domain. Diff.blog looks interesting | though, thanks for sharing. I might be adding it to my daily | list of sites to visit. | CA0DA wrote: | Sorry, mis-typed: https://wiby.me ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-05-28 23:00 UTC)