[HN Gopher] Heroic Rat Retiring from Detecting Land Mines ___________________________________________________________________ Heroic Rat Retiring from Detecting Land Mines Author : packet_nerd Score : 86 points Date : 2021-06-04 18:08 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.npr.org) (TXT) w3m dump (www.npr.org) | nestorD wrote: | APOPO (the association behind this initiative) lets you "adopt" a | rat: in exchange for money they give you regular information on | what and how it is doing. | | This sounded like a great gift so I did that for a friend but, | sadly, passed the "thank you for adopting your rat, here are some | information about him", he received no more information. | rchaud wrote: | The "Sponsor a ____" is a marketing tactic, the end result is | the same as setting up a regular monthly donation, it all goes | into the same pot, unless it's marked for a specific cause or | appeal. | | However, there is a way to do this right. I donate to the | Sheldrick Wildlife Trust, an elephant conservation region in | Kenya. You can sponsor an orphan baby elephant, and they send | you monthly updates on the elephant's growth, role in the herd | (Bull, matriarch, mini-matriarch, etc), and you can follow | their progress as they are rehabilitated and released into the | wild. | | If you just take the money and run, that sours people on giving | monthly. | rchaud wrote: | The article made absolutely no mention of how or why those land | mines got there in the first place. Considering that they exist | in such quantities that they are still being cleared up 40+ years | after the end of the Vietnam war, it should have at least had a | link to a story with more detail. | stickfigure wrote: | Which Vietnam war? You have several to choose from: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indochina_Wars | | The Cambodian-Vietnamese War ended in 1989, so the mines are | possibly not that old. | zaybqp wrote: | Most of the unexploded ordinances in this country were | dropped from big planes. Think clustered munitions and such. | Those big planes came from a far away land. | Vaslo wrote: | Source? | bugbuddy wrote: | The still-incomplete database (it has several "dark" | periods) reveals that from October 4, 1965, to August 15, | 1973, the United States dropped far more ordnance on | Cambodia than was previously believed: 2,756,941 tons' | worth, dropped in 230,516 sorties on 113,716 sites. | | US Air Force bombers like this B-52, shown releasing its | payload over Vietnam, helped make Cambodia one of the | most heavily bombed countries in history -- perhaps the | most heavily bombed. | | To put 2,756,941 tons into perspective, the Allies | dropped just over 2 million tons of bombs during all of | World War II. Cambodia may be the most heavily bombed | country in history. | | https://gsp.yale.edu/sites/default/files/walrus_cambodiab | omb... | botwriter wrote: | Depends what part of Cambodia, | | the last remaining strongholds of the Khmer rouge were heavily | mined, or could be on the vietnam/cambodian border. | whymauri wrote: | After working with rats for two years I came to the conclusion | that they're basically cats that drew the shortest end of the | cute stick. They more intelligent than people think and they have | about the same variance in personality as traditional pets like | cats/dogs. | rchaud wrote: | Cats live much longer than rats however. | whymauri wrote: | Yeah, rat cancer is no joke. | detaro wrote: | but rats _are_ really cute. You just don 't get to see a nicely | cared for one all that often compared to cats. | whymauri wrote: | I agree when they're well-groomed and not cranky they're very | cute. They love to purr if you scoop them, lol. | MivLives wrote: | If only they lived longer. | jsw97 wrote: | "We really trust our rats, because very often after clearing a | minefield, our teams will play a game of soccer on the cleared | field to assure the quality of our work," he said. | viktorcode wrote: | As a side note, biologically this is not a rat, but a pouched | mouse. | | Still, as a rat dad this makes me feel happy. Another example as | animals help to unfuck human errors | pvaldes wrote: | Finally somebody noticed this. This is not a lab rat. Is a | tropical rainforest species of pouched rat. Much bigger and | totally different creatures in many aspects. Is like calling | rabbit to a hare, or bison to a cow. | | Walking around and exploring until finding food is not "forced | labor", is what rodents do all the time in the wild. They are | inquisitive mammals by nature. I'm 100% sure that the rat enjoy | finding mines (= fruit) in the same way as we enjoy hitting | bricks in supermario games. Not to mention being safe from | predators at night, the veterinary healthcare services, being | cleaned from nasty parasites, the food, water and the human | company in an animal that is more or less social by nature. It | seems a very good deal for the animal. | | Trying to claim "animal cruelty!" here is a total nonsense. | motohagiography wrote: | Makes you wonder whether you could train birds by burying peanuts | over fake mines and then look for where they are scratching for | them. | | Less intelligent birds are best, because smarter birds like crows | would only scratch at some of the mines to attract people | intending to dispose of them, only to watch them trigger buried | ones in their path. It's something a cat would do as well. | lovemenot wrote: | You need to have confidence that a piece of land is cleared. If | a trained bird does not scratch a surface, does it give you | enough confidence to play football on it? | beebmam wrote: | What a great example of how language can be used to obscure | reality. This rat has no concept of the harm that may come to | them when performing this job that has been forced upon them. | | Now one might say: "This rat enjoys this work!". One cannot make | that claim without: 1. The rat having informed consent about what | this work entails (not possible, given a rat's limited ability to | understand what land mines are) 2. In good faith, the rat having | been given many alternatives as to what it wishes to do, without | coercion | | At its core, I see this as necessary work, whether it is | automated by machines or performed by humans or non-human | animals. | | But let's at least be clear what's happening here and not sugar | coat it: this is forced/coerced labor, there's nothing heroic | about it given that the rat has no idea what might happen to | them, and it's not a 'retirement' (this rat didn't wake up and | say, I'm going to retire today!), it's that the rat's handlers | have decided to no longer force/coerce this animal to work. | jopsen wrote: | You make a good valid point.. that being being said... Free | food for life in exchange for sniffing out 71 landmines that | I'm too lightweight to trigger... | | If I was a rat, I would take that deal... considering that the | alternative is, well, being an actual rat :) | | Yeah, sure, we didn't ask for consent, but I'll confess my | hamburger probably didn't consent either -- though I think we | only have get consent if we serve cookies :) | | (Bad jokes may be present) | treeman79 wrote: | Had a rat that loved packing peanuts. One night he found a | stash and kept grabbing them. After taking away the fourth | one, he ran up my arm and stared me straight in the eye for | about 30 seconds. He then proceeded to grab one and move the | further away. I'm quite sure I got chewed out by a rat. | vidanay wrote: | --- | uhtred wrote: | Can you link to any evidence that rats simply exist and don't | understand the concept of options? | uses wrote: | The rats aren't in danger though...that's the whole point. | | > Though they have terrible eyesight, the rats are ideal for | such work, with their extraordinary sense of smell and their | size - they are too light to trigger the mines. When they | detect a mine, they lightly scratch atop it, signaling to their | handler what they've found. | dTal wrote: | Well written. This was my thought as well. | | "Heroic" language is also deployed to distract from the | exploitation of humans financially coerced into doing dangerous | or stressful jobs. The clearest example I can think of is the | public glorying, on certain types of public holiday, in the | "heroic sacrifice" of all the soldiers who were marched | pointlessly into machine gun fire in WW1. | whymauri wrote: | Love this analysis. It reminds me of Maggie Mae's breakdown of | My Octopus Teacher as eco-horror film -- it ends up exploring | the same themes around language and communication that you | brought up here. [0] | | [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whb4unrhy44 | | Specific time stamp for section on language (Gorillas in the | Congo): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whb4unrhy44&t=1016s | hyperion2010 wrote: | The even deeper horror is that they explored many alternate | narratives, and this is the one that they collectively though | would, and in reality did, resonate most strongly with | viewers. | | The horror isn't the film makers, it is that this is the | narrative that global society prefers to hear. | | For even deeper horror still I suggest reading Francis Bacon, | since from square zero modern science is founded on the rape | of nature. | [deleted] | wesleywt wrote: | The article was not written for rats but for humans who love to | anthropomorphize. So you comment is moot. | summm wrote: | That's no different to people keeping dogs as pets. They are | exploiting pack behaviour, without really asking those animals. | lostlogin wrote: | I'd prefer he stayed and keep him fenced, but he could leave | within 20 seconds if he wanted to. | scotty79 wrote: | I think it's very apt that they use military language when | talking about this rat. | | Same language was used to describe heroic soldiers wanting to | save lives with exactly the same disregard of what actual | enlisted humans think and feel. | slver wrote: | OK, well, if we start dissecting our human acts the same way, | we'd literally end society. Most people are coerced into their | jobs, due to society taking away their means of alternate | survival, and job availability. | gcheong wrote: | Societies should exist for the benefit of the people living | in them. If aspects of it do not serve the people living in | them well then they should be abolished. | slver wrote: | That doesn't really mean anything. Society benefits some, | is to the detriment of others, and for most it's a mixed | bag. | gcheong wrote: | I said _should_ and, if you haven 't noticed, the things | people have often fought hardest for are changes to | society that increase benefits to the people living in | them that don't currently enjoy such benefits. | [deleted] | slver wrote: | The fact people have fought about things doesn't tell us | much either. Did they get what they fought about. Or not. | Typically not. Also is fighting to get more "society"? It | happens even without society. So it's not an example of | society. | ALittleLight wrote: | I agree that it's not heroic since the rat has no real | conception of what it's doing. I was curious after reading your | comment what the mortality rate among mine detecting rats was. | | This organization says that none of their rats have ever died | as a result of their detection work. As I understand it the | rats are too light to detonate the mines. Their role is just to | detect them and they don't have to worry about accidental | detonation. | | That makes sense if you think about it. If these mines were the | kind of thing that could be detonated by a curious rodent, they | probably wouldn't have lasted so long in rural areas. | | That's another reason not to call the rats heroic. There is no | real hardship for them in this work. They explore and smell and | get a reward when they find something. I'd bet it may be better | than a wild life, though a moral ideal might be letting the | rats choose to work or not. (I wouldn't suggest actually doing | that, since I think the forced labor of rats is a small price | to pay to save human lives, but ideally the rats would be | employees rather than slaves) | | https://www.apopo.org/en/herorats/faqs | spywaregorilla wrote: | > 1. The rat having informed consent about what this work | entails (not possible, given a rat's limited ability to | understand what land mines are) | | You can totally enjoy something while being ignorant to aspects | of the task | | > 2. In good faith, the rat having been given many alternatives | as to what it wishes to do, without coercion | | You can enjoy doing a task, while still enjoying something else | more. | | Sounds to me like this rat had a pretty good time eating | bananas. | vidanay wrote: | --- | nicoburns wrote: | You have no idea what it's like to be a rat, and no basis | by which to make this claim. Given that they are | intelligent mammals closely related to humans and with | similar brain structures, it seems plausible, even likely, | that they experience emotions thst are similar (if not | entirely the same) as ours. | | Humans are driven by food and reproduction too, but that | doesn't mean we don't also experience a wide range of | complex emotions. | ceejayoz wrote: | Rats enjoy and seek out tickling. | | https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/rats- | tick... | | > Panksepp and Burgdorf showed that the animals remembered | areas in their enclosures where they had been tickled | before and routinely returned to those sites. | | > And in the current study, rats were observed performing | something called Freudensprunge, or "joy jumps," after | tickling. | | They can also apparently feel regret: | | https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rats- | experience-f... | | > Rats showed both a behavioral sign of regret (turning and | looking at the missed high-value reward) and were then more | willing to wait for a reward following regret-inducing | instances, indicating that they learned from their mistake. | treeman79 wrote: | Ah typical old school scientific Nonsense. Similar to old | theories that babies don't feel pain. | | Spend a significant amount of time around animals and you | will see a lot beyond the more base rutting instincts. | zaybqp wrote: | Why do you have to be so negative? This rat is not at any risk | of harm because it is too small to trigger the mines. I would | say this rat has been and will continue to be very well taken | care of. It is also wholesome that people celebrate its | "retirement" and appreciate its accomplishments. Your criticism | is off base and rabid. | jaas wrote: | I think this story about the rat and what it did is cool, it | makes me happy, but I do agree with OP that the language of | the story misrepresents the reality of the situation. | | If I was given total control over your life and made you work | for me, would you be ok with that so long as, according to | me, I treated you well enough? I doubt it. | | That isn't the point though. This is not a debate about | whether anyone thinks the rat is being treated well. | | The rat did not consent to this (because it can't), so this | is, factually, forced labor. I am ok with it in this | situation, but let's call it what it is and express gratitude | for what the rat did to clean up human messes. | | Second, you can't do something heroically if you either 1) | don't know what you are doing and what the risks are or 2) | there are no risks. Take your pick, but either way it isn't | heroic. The rat did a great thing for us but hero is not the | right word. | bugbuddy wrote: | You seem to be suggesting that working animals are forced | labor. Does that include all the working dogs such as | police, rescue, military, and comfort dogs? | | The opposite of heroic is cowardly and it perfectly | describes people that try to silence opposing opinions. | zaybqp wrote: | I am not debating anyone. I just pointed out an invalid and | unreasonably negative criticism for what is a feel-good | news story. | | Back to your point. Do we ask for consent from working | dogs? Have you ever seen news about "heroic" rescue dogs? | What is your point really? Is it that we need to stop | employing animals? Do we need to stop using anthropomorphic | terms? Do we need to establish a ministry of truth and | speech to regulate that? | | To quote Zoolander, I feel like I am taking crazy pills | responding to these comments. | crooked-v wrote: | > The rat did not consent to this (because it can't), so | this is, factually, forced labor. | | On the other hand, anyone who's owned an uncooperative dog | will know that it's nigh-impossible to effectively train an | animal who just doesn't feel like playing along. | celticninja wrote: | And also a dog will do what you ask it because you ask it | and it wants too help you. My husky used to pull me on my | bike. He knew when I got the bike and lead out that was | what was happening and he wanted to do it. He certainly | did not think that he had to do it and could easily have | refused to let me put the harness on. | spywaregorilla wrote: | > If I was given total control over your life and made you | work for me, would you be ok with that so long as, | according to me, I treated you well enough? I doubt it. | | By definition, if you treat me well "enough", I'm already | satisfied. That's a silly proposition. | lovemenot wrote: | You might be missing the unspoken alternative. You will | be treated well, as long as you do my bidding. Otherwise | all bets are off. | spywaregorilla wrote: | If your bidding isn't pleasant enough to keep me happy | then you're not treating me well enough. The constraint, | as defined, is on the master. | lovemenot wrote: | You have made a tautology. It's moot. Coercion isn't all | about carrots. | jaas wrote: | I think you are missing the "according to me" (the person | you are working for) part of the sentence. | | In this thought experiment, like the rat, you have no say | in what constitutes being treated "well enough." | zaybqp wrote: | Why is my reply getting flagged? Nothing in my comment | breaks any rule. This was my reply that got flagged: | | I am not debating anyone. I just pointed out an invalid and | unreasonably negative criticism for what is a feel-good | news story. | | Back to your point. Do we ask for consent from working | dogs? Have you ever seen news about "heroic" rescue dogs? | What is your point really? Is it that we need to stop | employing animals? Do we need to stop using anthropomorphic | terms? Do we need to establish a ministry of truth and | speech to regulate that? | dundarious wrote: | I'm vegan and think treating animals as tools is unethical, | but I somewhat agree, how is this different from the | treatment of any beast of burden, or god forbid, livestock? | It seems so condescending to criticize people in less | technologically advanced countries for using beasts of burden | or livestock. | | I'm not trying to shut down abstract debate or discussion on | the issue of animal welfare/rights/liberation, but I do | perceive a lack of context leading to condescending criticism | of others living in tough circumstances where they literally | can't trust the ground they stand on to not suddenly kill | them. | CoastalCoder wrote: | Not GP, but for me it's a matter of striving to reason | clearly and correctly. I try to avoid slipping into pleasant | error on _any_ topic, because I don 't want mental habits | that let me do that with _important_ topics. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-06-04 23:00 UTC)