[HN Gopher] The rise of E Ink Tablets and Note Takers: reMarkabl... ___________________________________________________________________ The rise of E Ink Tablets and Note Takers: reMarkable 2 vs Onyx Boox Note Air Author : GordonS Score : 500 points Date : 2021-06-15 10:12 UTC (12 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.hanselman.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.hanselman.com) | jxdxbx wrote: | I have a Boox Note Air--but no have no interest in using it for | notes or "productivity." I just like e-ink for reading, and find | screens smaller than 10" to be too small (too much page-turning, | no good for PDFs). It's good as a reading device, and I like | being able to use Google Play Books and Instapaper (and the way | that Boox hides animations and increases contrast for Android | apps is clever). | | It could use a dedicated "page turn" button. | jhvkjhk wrote: | I'd like to have an E-Ink tablet, but the black flash when you | zoom in/out is really annoying(8:00 in the video). Is this flash | inevitable with E-Ink? | xwowsersx wrote: | I have been looking at the Remarkable 2 and other devices in this | category. My use case is taking notes on CS and maths, which both | often require diagrams and other drawings. Can anyone speak to | how well these devices work for this use case and how they | compare to note-taking with a pen and paper? | | To date, I have used pen and paper because taking such notes in a | text editor is too difficult and time consuming. To deal with the | risk of losing my physical notes, I take photos of the pages and | back them up to my Google Photos (text search through photos | works decently well actually), but I would much prefer to have | the notes in digital form to begin with. | thrower123 wrote: | One segment that has disappeared entirely, but which was | excellent for taking notes, was the 7-9" netbook. In college, I | bought two of the Asus EeePCs as cheap little beat-around Linux | laptops - far better to carry around campus than my real 17" | laptop. Also it would fit comfortably with those horrible little | rotating/folding desklets that you have in auditorium lecture | halls. With a little practice, you could type along at a good | clip in emacs with one hand. | mikesabbagh wrote: | There is something about handwriting, that makes it more | personalized. Show me a typed text, I cant tell you if I wrote it | 10 days ago, but handwritten things have a bit of "me" built in. | | I got my reMarkable2 6 months ago to sketch some infrastructure | stuff and keep a TODO list. It did help a bit in organizing! U | lose the papers u take notes on, but this stays longer and can be | helpful | mathewsanders wrote: | I was one of the supporters for the first remarkable and pre- | ordered with a bundle with case for $350 (I think) which seemed | pretty expensive but I really wanted to support businesses | developing these larger scale e-paper tablets. | | The battery life was really bad in the first software versions | but seems to be a lot better now. | | I use it for recipes (I like to write my own version out even | when working from a cookbook so that I can modify), UX sketches, | and most recently I've joined a bookclub and has been great to | highlight passages and write notes in the margin for discussion. | | Overall it's been useful, but the early bad experiences with | battery life/power management really turned me away from more | consistent use (after a couple meetings where it powered down and | had to go back to my desk to grab a paper pad). | | Would be curious to hear from anyone who got RM2 after RM1 and | what their battery life difference has been! | vendiddy wrote: | I bought the RM2 and used to have a RM1. The battery life is | much better, though I don't have any hard stats. | | They also improved a lot of my complaints with RM1 such as | difficulty erasing. | sdflhasjd wrote: | Has anyone here used a reMarkable 2 and had the chance to compare | it to a Supernote or a Note Air? | | I've had the opportunity to use a reMarkable in person, and it's | the first and only digital writing device that I could tolerate | to write notes. The MS Surface, iPad Pro and Samsung tablets have | never cut it for me. It's difficult to quantify why - a | combination of pen-to-display distance, latency and screen | texture perhaps. | | Reviewers seem to agree that the Supernote and Note Air have | higher latency, and higher pen-to-display distance, so I wonder | if I could work with them or not. | | The reMarkable seems to to be the go-to device as a digital | notepad, but doesn't do anything beyond that, whereas the other | devices offer a (near) full Android experience, which would be | more useful to me as a dwevice that costs PS400+. | sammorrowdrums wrote: | I mentioned below, but you.can see my thoughts on RM2 and Max | Lumi here: https://sammorrowdrums.com/e-writers- | remarkable-2-v-s | | Personally I don't get a lot out of the Android (as I really | try to avoid DRM e-books), but they are both nice devices. | Haven't tried Note Air. | sdflhasjd wrote: | I don't think I'd get a huge amount out of Android itself, | but just being able to install a browser with a reader mode | would be really nice. In my mind, I'd install Firefox and use | that when reading articles. | lallysingh wrote: | I installed a script on my laptop to 'Print' to remarkable. | I can send it articles to read on it later. | codethief wrote: | > Has anyone here used a reMarkable 2 and had the chance to | compare it to a Supernote or a Note Air? | | I have! See my comment here: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27513499 | | > Reviewers seem to agree that the Supernote and Note Air have | higher latency, and higher pen-to-display distance, so I wonder | if I could work with them or not. | | The Supernote does come with slightly higher input latency but | not by much - I got used to it pretty quickly and honestly | don't really notice it anymore. | m-p-3 wrote: | If the reMarkable could integrate well with other productivity | tools, I'd probably ask my employer for one. | | Being able to read my emails, manage my calendar, read my RSS | feeds, access my documents from Google Drive and optionally | annotate them (a copy of it in PDF form) would be what I'd have | in mind to justify buying one. | dbingham wrote: | Personally, I really wish the Remarkable 2 would integrate | with O'Reilly's new learning platform. I love having access | to just about every tech book ever written, but I hate | reading on a screen. The Remarkable is the perfect form | factor for displaying tech books and if I could get the | O'Reilly app on the Remarkable and read from their library on | it... that would be enough to push me over the edge to get | one. Hell, if that was all I ever did with it that would be | worth it for me. | newhouseb wrote: | You can do this on a Boox android-based e-ink tablet, which | I've done and generally works well (after initial setup | fiddling with the color to grayscale conversion) | Loughla wrote: | I've used the Note Air, briefly, and now use the RM2 everyday - | my use case is for reading documents, signing documents, and | storing notes at work due to the high number of lawsuits and | FOIA requests. I use it almost exclusively for those three | things. | | The Note Air felt like drawing on plastic. Like using a | ballpoint pen on a projector screen. It was easy for me to | drift around the page. And my already terrible handwriting | suffered. The transcription wasn't clean, and had many errors | based on my handwriting. The RM2 feels like writing on paper. | It has fantastic recognition for my handwriting, and the | transcribing has one or maybe two weird words per page. | | The only thing with the RM2 is there is no way to tag and | search your pages. So you have to be very strategic with how | you organize your notebooks, otherwise it's easy to just have a | mess of a million pages you can never get through to find what | you need. Tagging and searching would make the RM2 just | AMAZING. | dheerajrav wrote: | So, I've been using Remarkable-2 for over 6 months now. And it's | amazing! | | Pros: | | 1. A single charge lasts a WEEK! | | 2. I used to write a lot of notes on white sheets, add addendum | here and there. Now, its all on reMarkable. | | 3. My table clutter has reduced significantly. | | 4. I'm writing a lot more! | | 5. It syncs to cloud and I can immediately read the notes on my | computer, mobile. | | 6. It's so thin and lightweight. Definitely doesn't feel cheap. | It has a nice premium feel to it. | | 7. New updates like Pinch and Zoom functionality has made it | easier to read PDFs. | | Cons: | | 1. Battery life sucks if you're connected to WiFi. | | 2. Expensive - Product + Sleeve + Marker with Eraser sets you | back $500+. | | Strongly recommend to anyone who writes a lot. | frockington1 wrote: | Addressing the pricing con: I have the Remarkable 1 and it | addresses most of the pros but not quite as fancy as the 2. It | still costs a lot but is 300 vs 500. Seems like prices have | gone up since I bought it for ~200. | nicolimo86 wrote: | I was the owner of an Onyx Boox Max 2. The device was large | enough to allow the reading of A4 magizines. It's a pity that | after a year and a half I had to trash it because the battery was | about to explode. Very disappointed about it. Don't waste your | money with it... | dredmorbius wrote: | Onxy service battery replacements AFAIU. | edmundsauto wrote: | Shameless self-promotion: I am launching a free service to | consume emails on your RM2. I mostly wanted it so I can read | email newsletters, but plan to add some organizational features. | It works by signing up for email lists with your | @emailnewslettertracker.com address. | | www.emailnewslettertracker.com if you're interested in being a | beta tester. | jrimbault wrote: | Musicians, are there any tablet you use, recommend, for | partitions (sheet music) ? | | Someone I know uses a iPad Pro, 13" seems like a good size to get | the approximate good size. But it's also _very_ expensive for | just diplaying partitions. | occamschainsaw wrote: | There are "specialized" dual screen eink tablets for sheet | music, but they are extremely expensive(~$2000)! | | https://www.padformusician.com/en/products/19-21-padmu-3-lum... | | https://www.gvidomusic.com | filmgirlcw wrote: | I bought both of these last year and although the reMarkable 2 | has a great story, the software significantly lets it down. The | Boox Note Air isn't quite as good (but it is negligible in my | experience) of a "on-paper" writing experience but its software | is significantly better if you want to do anything other than | take hand-written notes. | jbrun wrote: | I have had my remarkable 2 for a month and really love it. It | replaces paper and annotating paper PDFs. It is simple and easy | to use. If you currently take notes or write paper PDFs, it is | for you (this is enough for many people). | FlyingSnake wrote: | I bought the Onyx Boox Note air after much deliberation. Apart | from the GPL violations, I don't see any major problems in the | Note air, and it's a perfect device for my needs. I can recommend | it to someone who wants a all-round eInk tablet. | | * Taking notes is really great, the notes app is highly | customisable to personal needs. Handwriting to text is quite | powerful as well. | | * Searching for text in your handwritten notes is a quite cool | and useful. | | * You can use the Kindle Android app and it's just perfect. | | * The browser is quite powerful and offers a great reading | experience. | | * Keyboard is surprisingly good, I like the write-to-text feature | very much. | pjerem wrote: | I loved my Remarkable but I returned it. | | I was pretty ok with the "it's just note taking" paradigm. But | the problem for me is that it should be "just a note taking" | device but with advanced note taking features, not just "nothing | more than a sheet of paper". | | The number one issue for me was the poor navigation experience. | Going from one page to another was a pain if they were not | contiguous. This could have been solved by allowing to create | "links" between pages for example. But I the end, I found myself | writing everything on the current page because getting to a new | page in the right place was too long. | | Let apart my issue, which maybe is really personal, Remarkable is | a remarkably (!) engineered experience. Particularly , the | writing experience is impressive. | dredmorbius wrote: | Could you not set multiple bookmarks and navigate between | those? | rchaud wrote: | Boox Note Air seems like the best fit for me, because it runs | full Android, instead of a restricted device-only OS. So for | example, if you want to use it as a glare-free word processor, | connect a BT keyboard, fire up Word and you're good to go. The | refresh rate is fine for normal typing. | | The problem is that Boox is a Chinese/HK brand with no customer | support depot overseas. So if you get a lemon, you might be able | to return it, but it'll be expensive, and your refund might be | subject to a restock fee depending on the vendor. | | The Kobo Elipsa is coming in a few weeks, and looks similar to | the Note Air, and is cheaper as well. It would be well-supported | in Canada, but it's running a custom Linux OS that's pretty | locked down and only integrates with Dropbox, Pocket and Kobo's | e-store. You can't sideload apps. | pomatic wrote: | I have an RM1 and it's pretty good, it's a one trick pony and | does that trick (paper notebook replacement) well. The only issue | I have is discovery/searching of old notes. If ReMarkable would | add wiki or roam style linking, it could readily become a second | brain. I really think they are missing a trick there... | Loughla wrote: | Honestly, if they would just allow any sort of tagging of pages | and selection by tag, this thing would completely change my | life. We get so many lawsuits and foia requests that being able | to quickly find notes related to "person a" or "activity a" is | vital. | | If the current RM2 had tagging, and an 8.5"x11" functional | screen, I would be obscenely content with the product. It might | be the perfect daily driver tool for my job at that point. | ABS wrote: | I have a Remarkable 2 and the device is great, software is | improving as well and taking notes is a joy BUT finding those | notes later on is next to impossible. | | OCR is very bad and basically makes indexing and full-text | searching impossible (and off device) | lallysingh wrote: | I generally end up taking my Big Notebook on my RM2, putting it | into page overview, and moving pages to different notebooks | later. | | OCR could never work with my handwriting. | CubsFan1060 wrote: | This is EXACTLY the reason why, after weeks of review, I ended | up with an iPad pro. | | Clearly it's a very different look and feel. However, using | GoodNotes, it immediately finds whatever I've written (even in | my sloppy handwriting) on any page I wrote it. It's kind of | amazing actually. | | I'd have preferred eInk, but notes that I can't find are not | useful to me. | Jedd wrote: | I bought a Pocketbook 912 [0] soon after it came out, around | 2012. It wasn't cheap - I think around PS400. It had a 9.7" | screen with a resolution of 1200x825. But the CPU & memory were | what you'd expect a decade ago, so the experience was quite | laggy. OTOH the display was superb for reading most text books - | almost native size, PDF rendering & page turning was _fast | enough_ , and zero eye-strain. It came with a pen for doing | highlights and basic drawing. I still use it occasionally for | distraction-free textbook reading. | | In 2014 I picked up a Galaxy Note Pro 12.2" - an android(ish) | device, good pen support. Slightly laggy, but the ability to sync | my notes and colour drawings (in SVGs, typically) back to my | computer was valuable. Samsung notoriously ceased supporting this | flagship product soon after release. (They're now on my list.) | | The Remarkable2 looks great, but I'm wary now. I'd want to be | extremely confident about inter-op of content between my | computers (Debian, mostly) and the device - in both directions - | before wanting to make a long-term commitment to yet another | platform. | | [0] http://www.pocketbook-int.com/au/products/pocketbook-pro-912 | abawany wrote: | I used to have a 912 as well but its bugs were tiresome so I | stopped using it. I can say that the rM2 is a very different | beast from that. I didn't expect to like the rM2 and was | anticipating returning it when I preordered it but now it | pretty much accompanies me everywhere. | Jedd wrote: | Can I ask two questions please? First, what _don 't_ you like | about it now that you've used it for a while? Second, are you | sharing data to and fro with a GNU/Linux desktop/laptop (if | to is the workflow comfortable) or is it primarily a reader | and note taker that generates notes that are sent one-way | back to your computer? | jpichon wrote: | The default sync app works fine with WINE without any | tweaking, for what it's worth. Been using it on Fedora for | a few months. | abawany wrote: | My biggest dislike is the storage: my ebook collection is | closer to 20GB and I'd love to be able to put it all in the | device but it's not to be. | | The sync story is itunes like (transfer+metadata), which I | somewhat dislike, but the use of rmapi plus other | mechanisms to transfer data to it (e.g. plug in via usb and | then post/curl a file vs. using their somewhat silly front | end directly) has made it work for me. | | I use their app as an easy way to look at my notes on my | work+personal laptop plus also use the send-as-email | functionality to share notes. I also transfer content from | my chromebook to it via the chrome plugin. | | All in all, the storage limitation is my biggest criticism | but in general the other improvements it's brought to my | life have been much appreciated. | | PS: I use the Staedtler Noris Digital Jumbo stylus instead | of the stock due to the built in eraser. The writing | experience is less realistic with this though but the | eraser is handier; I wish I had bought the marker plus when | I preordered. | | Edit: I didn't really answer your 2nd question: I don't | know of good approaches to share data with a Linux desktop | in this case though I think rmapi would do well for it. It | would be nice if they had a webapp vs platform dependent | apps for sharing data. Some of the hacks people have | developed for it might help in that case. I recommend | joining their discord or checking out remarkablewiki.com | Jedd wrote: | This is great, thank you. | | WRT 20GB - I'd just assumed it had a microSD slot. Your | comment led me down a spiral, to find a guy who pulled | the v1 device apart and soldered in socket for one. | That's _extra_ frustrating then that the electronics are | already there, but the socket + hole is not. [1] | | WRT pen - yes, I splashed out for the 'extra good' pen | for the Samsung, and was glad I did. The bundled pen was | serviceable, but things like the ersatz eraser, and | thicker / heftier feel, made it worth while. When ogling | the remarkable2 shop page I've kind of assumed I'd get | the better pen at the same time, so it's good to have | further confirmation on that gut feel. | | Sync - sounds like that SyncThing project I found | earlier, if it's still viable, might be a better option | for us Linux users. If the data is coming across as SVG's | or similar then I guess any native apps (Krita, etc) | _should_ work, but how good the interoperability on that | actually is ... is not well blogged about. (A doubly | niche market, I fear.) | | [1] http://www.davisr.me/projects/remarkable-microsd/ | abawany wrote: | The rM1 I think has the capability to solder in a socket | but it is not clear to me that the rM2 is similarly | modifiable. The low storage and the lack of support for | external storage via the usb-c port really make things | unnecessarily complicated. There is a rm2-pogo project | that hopes to use the built-in pogo pins to add support | for external accessories such as keyboard and storage but | it is still in progress | | I haven't checked out the remarkable-syncthing solution | you mentioned in a different comment but it seems like a | good idea. | hyperpallium2 wrote: | TFA mentions word processing - has anyone tried eink text editing | (say, vim, via termux on Boox android), for developing? Long | dreamt of this. | dredmorbius wrote: | I've got an Onxy BOOX with the optional (and cheap!) Bluetooth | keyboard. | | As this is an Android device, Termux (a Linux userland for | Android) is available (through F-Droid). So yes, both vim and | emacs (as well as a slew of other editors). | | I've done some light editing on the device, and the display is | generally suitable. My main gripe is that there's no way to | position the device and keyboard in my lap in a stable format | (a kickout selfsupporting folio case, as I have for an earlier | Android tablet, would be better). | | And: as with all Android devices, the OS chooses to kill what | the OS chooses to kill, when it wants, for memory GC purposes. | So that shell session may suddenly cease to be at any point | (usually when backgrounded and you're tending to other | affairs). This is ultimately a dealbreaker. Android is simply | not suitable to Real Work. | | (You could use Termux + keyboard + ssh + screen/tmux to work on | another remote system, of course, but that's not nearly as | portable, unless you're carrying that remote system with you at | all times as well.) | danidiaz wrote: | This is one such setup: | https://twitter.com/fresheyeball/status/1403192219092144130 | LeanderK wrote: | My girlfriend got a remarkable 2 and is really, really happy with | it. We are both computer-science master students and beside the | remarkable she uses an older laptop. Of course it's expensive, | but if you are doing a lot of handwriting or annotating pdfs it's | might be worth it. She spends most of her day using the | remarkable, not her laptop. She also started using it to organise | her day, it just works as good as any physical planner. There's | something pleasant about writing per hand and they really nailed | writing. | | It probably is important that we both don't really code that | much, it's only a smaller part of our studies. | master_yoda_1 wrote: | I am very price conscious and want an e-book just to read | research paper pdf. I don't care if it does ssh or it has memory | or i can write on it. I just want it to read pdfs. What do you | guys suggest. | qwerty456127 wrote: | A little bit too expensive but so cool (because not just eInk but | also hackable!) I'm definitely going to buy it. At the same time | I would never buy function-limited proprietary thing like Kindle | even if it was extremely cheap (I actually bought a PocketBook | instead). | mattowen_uk wrote: | I want to switch fully to digital magazines (as PDFs or via the | publishers apps), but I can't find the right hardware to do this. | | I've worked out that for almost 100% scaling of a magazine PDF, I | need about a 13" screen, in 4:3 ratio (or thereabouts). 16:9 | ratio is just too tall and thin. | | e-ink devices seem too expensive for this single use-case, as | does the iPad Pro, which although ideal is massive overkill. | | I've even started going down the crazy route of trying to design | something with a Raspberry Pi zero, and a HDMI LCD panel, but the | power draw seems too prohibitive to make it viable. | | Does anyone have any other suggestions here? | squarefoot wrote: | The RPi boards aren't the best choice for low current | consumption, even other competing but similar ARM boards are | better suited for that use. However, the main processor is just | one of the power hungry devices: a LED screen needs its | backlight on to be read, while an e-paper screens don't, and | their power consumption falls to zero when the user is reading | a still image, which also allows the processors to enter in | extremely low power sleep modes. Making a reader with LCD/LED | displays in my opinion is doable, but tuning the power | consumption to save as much power as possible will require a | lot of effort, and would never compare to e-readers anyway. | However, if one accepts a heavier and more thick device, then | yes, it's definitely doable, and could also become a better | platform for other uses too. | abawany wrote: | How about a Chromebook with a detachable screen (e.g. Lenovo | Duet, Acer, or the HP X2)? These can run Android apps and thus | support most digital magazine apps such as Zinio plus they | often cost much less than a comparable ipad. | dredmorbius wrote: | For any current publications, you can probably get by with | slightly reduced page-size, so a 10" device should still | present most _current and well-typeset_ content at full-page | width. | | Most e-book readers have an option to specify in-page | navigation of a document, generally into four quadrants, read | either in "" or "Z" flow (first is "article", second is "comic | book" navigation"). This effectively quadruples screen | resolution, at the cost of a slight decrease in fidelity to the | original experience. Given the cost trade-offs in devices | (~$340 for 7.8", $800 for 13.3") this may be acceptable. | | That said, I splurged on the 13.3" Max Lumi. The first time I | was faced with a less-than-perfect scan of a three-column | article first published in the 1970s that I could comfortably | read at full size (with just a smidge of margin trim), it was | worthwhile. If your budget constraint is stronger, you still | have options. | | Most book texts read fine at 8", so the compromise is not | something you'll be seeing all the time. | DevX101 wrote: | Check out the Youtube channel My Deep Guide for an in-depth | comparison of e-ink writing devices: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CH1pWqY0lPs | squarefoot wrote: | Ah, e-readers. I'm looking for a good one since forever, but they | are either too small, too slow or too costly. Hopefully | technology developments will bring soon a good 10" before my eyes | will need a 15" one:) Reading old books and magazines is also a | problem: they're often 100% graphics with no OCRed text, | therefore they're really slow, also zooming a page with diagrams | on a technical book can be painful on low end hardware. | | Does anyone have a model to suggest with 10" screen size? I don't | have many other requirements, other than: | | Decent speed, storage space and battery life. Support for beefy | pdfs and other e-book formats. (this is important, one of my old | readers took like forever to load a big book, then 15 seconds to | turn each page). I would connect it only to my network, so it | must not rely on cloud services et al. Color not needed, | grayscale will do if well implemented. Taking notes not needed, | although being able to fill pdf forms might be handy, but it's | not a requirement. | dredmorbius wrote: | I splurged on the 13.3" Onyx BOOX Max Lumi for largely similar | reasoning: I do a lot of reads of older materials with poor- | quality scans, and wanted to be able to read as many of those | at full-screen rather than zoomed resolution. I also had | concerns with the size of the device. | | I'm happy with my purchase, though with experience, I'm happy | to suggest trade-offs. | | Onyx's product line is based around 7.8", 10.3", and 13.3" | e-ink screens. Those are what their vendor offers, so it's what | Onyx bases its builds around. | | My previous experience was with a 9" emissive (OLED) Android | tablet, which saw principle use as an e-book reader (the only | application to which it's well-suited), with portrait-mode | presentation of books and articles working fairly well. It was | hard to read in bright light, with overhead lighting (screen | glare), or, of course, outdoors. | | The jump to 13.3" e-ink at 220 ppi makes even low-quality scans | of small-print materials readable at full size (without | zooming). There are a few specific cases that really impressed | this on me. Many books can be read _landscape_ mode, 2-up, | which is also good. | | The device is large, about the size of an A4 or Letter-sized | paper tablet. This is _just about_ at the maximum size for | comfortable in-hand viewing, and you might prefer a smaller | device. It packs easily into my courier pouch. | | If you don't wanto to spend the $800 (over $900 when you | include stylus and cover), you can shave a a few hundred on a | smaller device with some compromises in reading convenience. | There's an in-page navigation that will scroll either in | "reverse-N" or "Z" mode, for articles or comics, respectively, | dividing the page into four regions (a 2x zoom). This makes | virtually any material readable, at a cost of not being able to | see the full page in a single glance. Even with a 10" or 8" | device, you'd likely only have to engage this for a portion of | your reading. Most books are readable at 100%, and even many | articles. You can also trim margins to increase the size of the | actual text on the page. | | Battery life is quit good (I get a couple of days per charge, | but use the device for much of the day, what I'm spared is any | battery anxiety), performance is quite good, the display is | delicious. | | The notetaking feature wasn't something that attracted me to | the device _but it has turned out to be surprisingly useful and | appealing_. | dont__panic wrote: | No offense, but the article discusses 10" ereaders heavily | (that's the screen size of both the reMarkable 2 and the Note | Air). There's also the Kobo Elipsa if you'd like something | that's totally focused on reading. | | I've been using a 7.8" Nova 3 myself for a few months now, and | it's a dramatic improvement over the 6" Kindle I was using | before. I love having a screen that's closer to the size of | your average hardcover page, and it's just large enough to make | PDFs readable at 100% zoom. It's also very fast, though there's | always a bit of perceivable e-ink related lag unless you put an | app on the fastest refresh rate. The warm frontlight is also | the best I've experienced on an ereader, even better than what | I've seen on Kindles. | | IMO, 10" might be a smidge too large for comfortably reading in | bed -- the Note Air might feel a bit too large physically and | heavy to hold up if you're reading for long periods of time | with one arm holding it up. If that's a common use case for | you, you should really consider the Onyx Boox Nova 3, like I | have, or maybe the Kobo Forma, which is a bit cheaper and | reading-focused. | | I'm using my Nova 3 completely disconnected from the internet | most of the time, though I do occasionally find it useful to | fire up Firefox for random browsing (and to sometimes transfer | files with https://snapdrop.net/, which is like Apple's Airdrop | on your local network). I don't think using the Nova 3, Forma, | Elipsa, reMarkable 2, or Note Air offline most or all of the | time would be a problem, though from what I can tell reMarkable | has invested a lot in sync functionality that you might not | necessarily want to turn off. Though the reMarkable probably | wouldn't be for you, since it's focused on note-taking, rather | than reading. | squarefoot wrote: | Thanks. They seem really nice devices, especially the | Remarkable2. | | The problem with working online is that most of these devices | phone home regularly, and while I wouldn't mind if they read | with me an electronics magazine or book, that would be | different since I'd also use a reader for displaying medical | prescriptions and/or other personal documents. | | Broadly speaking, device manufacturers (TVs, home appliances, | etc.) became obsessed with making users sign in to their own | cloud and downloading their own app; no thanks, I'd rather | buy a device that lets me browse shares on the local network | I'm connected to, and/or save documents into their storage | using a USB cable. If the reader and the media are both | within my house walls, I don't see reasons to connect | outside. | gilbetron wrote: | I picked up a kindle fire 10 for the express purpose of reading | PDFs (RPGs, mostly, so lots of graphics), and I'm very happy | with it. It is far from perfect, but it is really cheap and you | get a lot for the money. You can easily install the google app | store and get a solid pdf reader (I like Xodo). I got it on a | Black Friday sale for $90, but they are normally $150. So worth | the price! | | I just wish they would put out a 12 or 13" one, and wish the | aspect ratio was a bit more square to fit more PDFs perfectly. | remisharrock wrote: | And the Notea ! Looks like it's full android under the hood. And | it's french https://bookeen.com/pages/notea-bloc-notes-numerique | dash2 wrote: | Has anyone had any experience with e-ink monitors? I work long | hours at a screen and have two problems: | | 1. I get eyestrain and find it hard to concentrate. | | 2. The bright screen seems to be very "addictive" and I find | myself browsing hacker news, reddit etc. instead of working. | | I wonder if an e-ink or RLCD screen might solve these problems. | There are some new 25" screens coming out this year. | tyler109 wrote: | I am using 80% of my time working with Dasung eink monitor. The | advantages are: -Zero eyestrain -Focussed work/Less Distraction | -Less temptation to do anything else (e.g. videos) because its | not inviting to do so -More energy after work day and improve | of sleep quality -No Bluelight exposure | | Disadvantages: -Only BW so need to look at normal screen for | graphics -Needed two eink screens otherwise two small to work | (but ordered now the 25inch one) | | Here is a pic of my setup (actually Dasung featured it): | https://twitter.com/DasungTech/status/1391693381726658561/ph... | | The 25 inch screen is already out and ordered mine, can't wait | for it to come: | https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/paperlike-253-the-first-2... | solarkraft wrote: | E-Ink devices are cool. Anything above 6" is just way too | expensive. | oggy wrote: | I bought a Remarkable 2 for note taking and annotating scientific | papers. As far as it's promise of "better paper", I think it's | only partly fulfilled. I haven't returned it, but I'm sadly also | not using it regularly. | | It's obviously better than paper since you don't end up with | stacks of printed articles. The feel of reading and writing is | also exactly like paper, which is great. You get some basic | select/cut/paste functionality, which improves on paper. But. | | I used it to take notes at work, create simple TODO lists etc. | The issue with this is that the resulting notes are way harder to | navigate than a simple paper notebook, as the software doesn't | support even basic bookmarks. Whereas with paper I can add | bookmarks as I please, a paper organizer notebook allows me to | navigate my calendar easily etc. I'm still amazed that the RM | software offers absolutely no functionality for such navigation. | This is a huge drawback for me. | | When using it to annotate PDFs, the app offers you a few tools | (pencil, pen, eraser, etc). Ideally you'd like to fit the article | on the remaining portion of the screen, possibly cropping the | margins if your the article is created for a different page size | and your eyesight is as bad as mine. But the support for this | sucks, as the toolbox always covers a piece of the document, so | you end up having to hide/unhide it constantly. | | Next, while the pen feels quite good, and feels almost as precise | as a real pencil, I find the eraser quite hard to control. It | erases an area somewhere around the end of the pen, but unlike a | physical eraser, you don't see its boundaries. There's no support | for stroke-based erasing. Finally, stating the obvious, the | device is black-and-white. But I find different colors helpful | when annotating papers, or creating sketches of systems etc. | | So right now I can't really recommend the device, but I'm still | holding onto mine hoping it will improve. I think the hardware | can serve as a basis for better paper - but I think the software | would need many of the features of http://www.styluslabs.com/ to | get there | lordgrenville wrote: | I've been thinking of buying a ReMarkable, but all I really want | is a reader without a backlight that can handle PDFs smoothly. | (Ability to mark up is a plus but not necessary.) Based on this | thread it seems like the RM/Boox are not really what I'm looking | for. | jessmartin wrote: | I read PDFs (and highlight and annotate) on my RM2 daily. It's | a _fantastic_ PDF reader, IMO. It's the ability to annotate | that's killer for me. I mark things up extensively, writing | notes in the margins, starring items, underlining, and writing | on the RM2 screen is a paper-like writing experience. | | It's e-reader software is a bit meh, so I still read books | (fiction, mostly) on my Kindle Paperwhite. | noobly wrote: | So you don't have issues with the lack of PDF reflow? I just | want something that works for reading and doing math/cs while | laying in bed. | jessmartin wrote: | Oh, I absolutely _don't_ want PDF reflow! The PDFs I read | are formatted a specific way for a reason. 2-column, latex- | generated academic papers, etc. | | Reflow is one of the worst things to happen to digital | publishing, IMO. I get it that it makes ebooks readable, | but typesetting is an art, and one we haven't even come | close to nailing in the digital realm. | agentultra wrote: | I have an RM1 and RM2 and love the device. | | My kid has been doing remote learning during the pandemic and | using my RM1 for her school work. Wrote some scripts that sync | the handouts her teacher posts online to the RM1 and she can work | on them as if she was drawing on paper handouts like she would in | school. This is much better than what the teachers were trying to | teach her to do: using Adobe's PDF reader and marking up the PDFs | using all those menus and buttons and typing things in. | | I enjoy writing long-form especially when I need to _think_. I | find that I get a lot of subtle anxiety and distraction using a | modern computer these days that I can 't just sit and think | deeply about a problem anymore while using one. Instead I can | take the RM2 to a quiet place, take my notes, and I can use the | transcribe features to email myself plain text later or send a | copy of individual pages where I've scribbled diagrams, etc. I | then refine and edit my thoughts down later on a computer. | | I want to be able to do more of my computing this way to be | honest. Document-oriented, using long-form writing, being able to | step away into different physical spaces without missing | anything. | | Overall though I am really happy with my RM2. It doesn't replace | my paper journals... I still prefer those for longevity/archiving | -- but it does great for ephemeral notes, books, marking up | papers, etc. It's great for capturing the seed of ideas and | letting me work without distractions. | KuhlMensch wrote: | I wonder what the average age of an E-Ink Tablet purchaser is vs | a purchaser of a traditional tablet (traditional tablet being an | iPad, not a wax-covered slate) | [deleted] | yepthatsreality wrote: | I love my Remarkable 2 but I will say their customer service | experience was pathetic. | | When I received my Remarkable 2 I had an issue with the WiFi card | as it would connect and then after syncing once it would | disconnect and required a restart to get it working again. So I | emailed support to discuss a replacement. The support had me | adjust MY router to specific channels so that the WiFi card could | work (the only device I've had to do this for, and I have my | channels tuned to not interfere with the neighbors). The problem | persisted for the first few months I had the device and after I | made the adjustments. I even offered to use my software | engineering skills to help diagnose this issue on the device. | | Worse still, the customer support agent stopped responding to my | emails. I don't know if there was a software update that fixed | this issue, but the way the customer support black balled me and | gave up, I will probably not buy another device from them again, | especially if there are similar devices on the market. | | Why? I tried to support this company by preordering and go | through the proper channels and it lead me to a place where a | customer support agent decided my questions and time were better | shoved into the abyss rather than address my concerns. That | doesn't happen from a customer support agent actions, but rather | how management and C-suite trains customer support agents. | | I've actually been saving the emails from companies that do this | to me. Anyone know somewhere I can report and share my poor | experiences with companies (ex BBB)? | abawany wrote: | Their CS seems to have improved a lot in the last few months | and there is now an accompanying survey at the end of each | interaction (ime) so if you still have your device, I would ask | you to retry. Also, consider joining the Discord/Matrix/Reddit | forums for the device if you like - someone might be able to | help you anyways. | yepthatsreality wrote: | The problem has been fixed by a software update or some | change I did not perform. If a company wants me to use a chat | service or forum to solve my problem, they should direct me | there and/or maintain that service. I contacted them directly | to their support service, which should be trained to deal | with questions, not push them into the abyss. While I | appreciate your feedback I think it's a band-aid to the | problem. | | There's nothing wrong with saying: | | "We have found that your problem is common and are working on | a solution. We will reach out in a few weeks once this has | been resolved." | | Then the company can gather like problems and triage for | later resolution. | | I mean really sometimes it seems like companies act like | support is a mystery and they have the first buggy product | ever on the market. | theodric wrote: | I had an Onyx Boox 1 and it was slower than my 5-year-old iPad, | the touchscreen would only register touches from the stylus they | didn't provide so much as a storage strap for, and the OS was | Android 6 with a custom spin so you couldn't load a lot of normal | apps on it, and was abandoned and never upgraded. Total dogshit | waste of EUR400. I gave it to my dad after a week. I hope he used | it as a rifle target, but I never asked. | dredmorbius wrote: | For anyone reading this, finger-touch may be enabled or | disabled on BOOX devices. | | My BOOX cover has a stylus loop. | Bayart wrote: | I've been tempted to get one of those for my coding hours as I'm | back in the office and can't use the whiteboard I have at home | (on top of having a hefty amount of technical books and articles | I want to get through in PDF), but I had doubts on the refresh | rate and the cost. The feedback from the thread quite convinced | me. | jcfrei wrote: | I keep reading that reading stuff on a paper or e-ink display is | easier on the eyes than a monitor. Certainly makes sense if the | comparison is to a CRT but compared to a standard LCD? Are there | any medical studies that confirm this? As far as I know modern | life exposes us to far little brightness, causing myopia for a | lot of people. If anything a very bright backlight display should | probably be better for our eyes... | illwrks wrote: | I think it comes down to emitted light vs reflected light. | | If you're looking into an LCD panel and the light it's emitting | is not adjusted to match the environment you're in, too bright | or too dull, then you will strain your eyes. | | With an e-ink screen, anything printed, or even a cinema | screen, it doesn't usually emit light and therefore relies on | the light emitted from other things around you to reflect off | of the surface, illuminating the surface of the thing you're | looking at. This is more natural and provides less strain on | your eyes. | | On a personal preference side of things, I can't look at bright | sources in the evening. My wife is a terror for looking at her | phone at 100% brightness, it's blinding if she hands it to me | to look at. Where as my devices are setup to dim and be as low | as possible in the evening, even the profile on the TV. | tluyben2 wrote: | I work a lot in the sun (even in the shade here there is a lot | of sun) and a lot of times I have to get inside to do any work | as normal LCD is simply not readable. While eInk is readable | like, well, paper. So works fine in sun and shade. | vbezhenar wrote: | I don't think that's true as long as you provide healthy | lightning. Light is light, doesn't matter whether it came from | the sun or from backlight lamp. E-ink obviously is preferable | when you're reading in the direct sun light, because LCD could | be barely visible in those conditions. | tzs wrote: | One significant difference is that with e-ink you _can_ | provide healthy lighting. With an LCD display you are stuck | with whatever backlighting is built in. | rlkf wrote: | Light from the sun contains a much greater number of | wavelengths (and different depending on time of day) than | that from the backlight; it's not the same. | noja wrote: | Why the ReMarkable doesn't have a backlight I do not understand. | mariusor wrote: | The new Kobo Elipsa has lighting. I'm wondering if the writing | experience will suffer on it. | sarreph wrote: | Pure speculation, but could be a combination of keeping the | thickness down (it's only 4.7mm thick), and the _purism_ of | recreating the pen-on-paper feel. | | That being said I wouldn't be bothered at all about a thickness | increase, or breaking out of the pen-on-paper "immersion"... | Perhaps there's a more technical reason. | martin_a wrote: | The whole purpose of E-Ink is to use "passive" displays which | are more comfortable to the eye. Adding a backlight would | remove that. | furgooswft13 wrote: | I have an Onyx Boox Max Lumi [1], there are 2 reasons why the | "backlight" is very useful. | | First off it's not really a backlight like you see in most | LCD displays, it's a front-light, or edge-light that projects | directly on to and is reflected by the e-ink display (the | transparent top layer of the display acts as a wave guide for | the edge lighting, and it's really quite an impressive | engineering feat that they got it to apply so evenly on a | 13.3" display area). | | Obviously this will be useful when ambient lighting is too | dim to even read paper, but the fact is current e-ink | technology is just not as reflective, or high contrast as | regular printed text on copy paper. The front-light | illumination at low to mid levels (at least on the Onyx | series) goes a long way towards making the screen background | look almost as white as real paper. Granted if you are | outside in the sun you will not notice the frontlight even at | max brightness. But in dim indoor lighting, it's the | difference between looking at greenish-grey kinda washed out | image, and something that might fool a casual passer by into | thinking it really is paper & ink. | | 1: https://onyxboox.com/boox_maxlumi | schwartzworld wrote: | Most e ink doesn't use a true backlight, but an array of | lights along the inside of the bezel that light up the screen | reflectively. It's still very good for battery life. Both the | kindle Paperwhite and the onyx tablets have this feature. | Onyx even let's you tune the warmth of the light. | emodendroket wrote: | The Kindle Oasis also does this | fsloth wrote: | IMO lighting on an E-Ink display does not increase the strain | any more than illuminating a paper with reading lamp does. | 0-_-0 wrote: | You can turn off the backlight | ploek wrote: | I'm going to guess it is to keep it slim. And while I normally | think this fad to make everything thin is stupid, in this one | case I feel it makes sense. You want the thing you're writing | on to protrude from the table as little as possible. | oblio wrote: | Thin (and especially light) tablets are not stupid. | | I have the fact that especially "pro" tablets are becoming | heavier. They're not comfortable to hold. | | In my opinion the "perfect" tablet should not weigh more than | 250-300 grams, we just don't have the tech for a flagship | tablet that can weigh that much, yet. | tzs wrote: | I find weight particularly important for reading in bed or | when lying down on the couch. | | Experimentally, I've found that my Kindle (320 grams | including case) hurts a lot less than my iPad (470 grams) | which hurts a lot less than my Surface Pro 4 (790 grams) | when dropped on my face. | ploek wrote: | You are right of course. I was primarily thinking of | phones, where the battery life is sacrificed for half a | millimeter and laptops, where ports are eliminated for a | millimeter or two. | emodendroket wrote: | From what I've read, consumers will not admit it, but | thinness is one of the biggest factors that influences | their purchasing decisions | codethief wrote: | AFAIK adding backlight means that the distance between the | display and the pen tip needs to increase, so you end up with a | small parallax effect and writing doesn't feel as natural | anymore. | dredmorbius wrote: | Also, paradoxically, the added light layer reduces screen | contrast when the light itself is off. | | (Have an Onyx BOOX Max Lumi with Frontlight. The display is | good in strong light, but even under fairly-brightly-lit | indoor conditions, the Frontlight is useful.) | 0-_-0 wrote: | I would probably buy it if it had one, but I want to read in | the dark often without turning the lights on and bothering | others. | teekert wrote: | There are probably cases with small leds. | mrfusion wrote: | Buy a book light? | 0-_-0 wrote: | Still too bright | mrfusion wrote: | I made a dimmer for mine and works great. I Just put a | few layers of tissue paper over it but really anything | you find around the house. | salamandersauce wrote: | Boox Note Air has a front light built in. | bradklein wrote: | Same here. I'm so used to reading with the backlight at night | for years (kindle paper white and Oasis) that going back to | clip-on external light (I haven't used one since the paperwhite | came out, do then even sell those still???) is a non-starter | for me. | paultopia wrote: | I have a remarkable 1, and, honestly, I'm deeply disappointed in | it. It'd pretty slow just in terms of hardware responsiveness, | which maybe the RM2 corrects, but it also just... gets most of | the little things wrong in a way that makes it feel so much worse | on a day to day basis than most consumer-grade tech projects. | | For example: it comes with its own cloud sync. Which is extremely | slow and unreliable: if you upload a pdf from a laptop, it might | show up right away, or it might show up tomorrow, there's no way | to tell and no reliable way to force synchronization. | | Or this: the software is super clunky. For example, there's no | direct switching between documents. If you're reading a PDF and | trying to take notes in a separate file (a good idea because it | is also really hard to just get annotations out of a PDF), it | takes a looong time to close the pdf, open the other notebook, | take the note, close the notebook, and reopen the PDF again. | | Honestly, the remarkable experience has soured me on the entire | class of products. I really want to get that color onyx book | thing, but I'm too skeptical. | fancy_pantser wrote: | > For example, there's no direct switching between documents. | | In case you haven't seen it already: | https://github.com/ddvk/remarkable-hacks | | The ddvk hacks are easy to apply and reversible. They add a | bunch of gestures like instantly flipping between documents. | One of my other favorites is a quick swipe gesture to switch to | the last-used tool. | | I don't want to annotate PDFs and then only save the | annotations, but it sounds like biff would help with that if | you don't mind another tool in the chain: | https://github.com/soulisalmed/biff | sydd wrote: | do not get a boox. First they do not publish their kernel | source violating GPL, second the device constantly phones home | to China and third the color display is really clunky: low | contrast, washed out colors and very low DPI (around 160). | | Wait a few generations until color eink tech is fleshed out. | paultopia wrote: | Thank you. Really good to know those things. | amval wrote: | I bought the ReMarkable 2 when it was released. The hardware is | beautiful (as well as the packaging and presentation). The | software was pretty underwhelming, but they seem to be speeding | up and fixing glaring deficiencies. | | For my use case, it's lovely (reading and annotating technical | books and papers, meetings, writing, even the drawing experience | is better than expected). | | Right now there are things that I could imagine myself wanting | but not really _needing_. Maybe plugging in a keyboard would be | appreciated. | | I can really recommend it if you enjoy "thinking" with paper and | writing by hand. I am barely use traditional notebooks anymore. | Plus: it's a very open and hackable device. | rbanffy wrote: | the ghosting of e-paper displays is somewhat reminiscent of paper | magazines, when you see the ink from the other side of the page. | u678u wrote: | Hisense has some eink phablets that look awesome too. | https://goodereader.com/blog/product/hisense-a7-5g-e-ink-sma... | AshamedCaptain wrote: | Wait until the Kaleido 3 color 10'' panels. | Teknoman117 wrote: | With how hackable the remarkables have been (u/rmhacks on Reddit | even booted straight Debian on them), I'm somewhat surprised | there hasn't been an effort to completely replace the stock | firmware with a tailored replacement. | | Maybe that should be my side project... | stakkur wrote: | _" E Ink is easier on the eyes than OLED and iPads and the | like."_ | | This is a popular anecdotal claim, but as far as I know there is | zero research to solidly back it. There is research showing | there's little difference, however. One example: | | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22762257/ | sireat wrote: | I have RM2 and use it less than I would like to. | | RM2 is fine as a note taking device but is suboptimal for | reading. | | As many other have said the Remarkable 2 hardware is impressive | but the default software is weak for basic reading tasks. | | With Koreader RM2 is quite decent. | | Latest RM2 update seems to have bricked Koreader though so I will | have to reinstall it. | | Still, I prefer the original Sony DSP-1 13inch e-reader or even | Kobo 6.8 inch e-reader for long reading sessions. | oblio wrote: | I wonder which will happen faster: | | A) classic displays (LCD/OLED/Mini-LED/Micro-LEDs) reaching a | point where the quality and power consumption are so low as to be | indistinguishable from paper | | B) Color e-ink displays get good enough for interactive use, | movie watching, etc. | | Maybe someone who's an expert in display tech can chime in? My | money's on A) since so much is invested in it. | nicoburns wrote: | I think A is fundamentally impossible. A backlit display is | always going to look different to a reflective surface. | | My money's on C: a new display tech which works similarly to | color E-ink, but isn't actually E-ink. Qualcomm's Mirasol | technology looked amazing for this, but sadly it never made it | into any mainstream products and they've basically shut it down | at this point. | 0-_-0 wrote: | In principle it's possible to measure the ambient light and | set the emitted light to simulate reflected light from paper | so that an OLED looks indistinguishable from paper. Next gen | QLED displays might have the brightness to pull this off even | in bright sunlight. | simias wrote: | If you really want to simulate reflected light you also | have to be able to control the angle of the light that you | emit, and you want to absorb incoming light almost | completely otherwise there'll be a conflict (glare, in | particular). | | I suspect that it might be easier to improve reflective | displays, but I have no expertise in this field so maybe | I'm completely wrong about that. | 0-_-0 wrote: | > If you really want to simulate reflected light you also | have to be able to control the angle of the light that | you emit | | Uniform emission is fine because paper has close to | Lambertian reflectance. "The apparent brightness of a | Lambertian surface to an observer is the same regardless | of the observer's angle of view." [0] | | > and you want to absorb incoming light almost completely | otherwise there'll be a conflict (glare, in particular). | | Or make sure that the display itself has close to | Lambertian reflectance and take into account its color in | the emission calculations. | | [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambertian_reflectance | taneq wrote: | > I think A is fundamentally impossible. A backlit display is | always going to look different to a reflective surface. | | Not all LCDs are backlit. Some are purely reflective or | 'transflective' (eg. the screen used on the old Gameboy.) | That's not to say they look like paper now but it's not 100% | impossible. | | Edit: Also the screen used on the Pebble Time watches looks | reasonably close to a colour print-out with the backlight | off. These are a "memory LCD" made by JDI (although they were | somewhat confusingly marketed as "e-paper" despite being an | LCD.) | [deleted] | bryanrasmussen wrote: | >A) classic displays (LCD/OLED/Mini-LED/Micro-LEDs) reaching a | point where the quality and power consumption as so low as to | be indistinguishable from paper | | I thought in relation to eye strain and ability to read in | sunlight the quality would be theoretically impossible to ever | be indistinguishable? | robinsoh wrote: | I work in the display industry. My take is neither will happen. | Lets start with B. | | > B) Color e-ink displays get good enough for interactive use, | movie watching, etc. | | There is no commercially sold genuine color e-ink today. | Kaleido is a grayscale e-ink with a color filter laminated on | top. Kaleido Plus is just the same with a light guide. | | E Ink did show off a genuine color display back in 2018 called | Advanced Color and marketed as "Gallery". But it would take 30s | to display an image and it was 32 colors or 16 colors. Not | 16-bit color. I mean only 16 colors. E Ink tried to get the | industry to buy in and start making products using this | technology but nobody really signed on. They revamped their | production to then start producing 7 color panels in much | smaller sizes like 5" for signage. I heard that hasn't hit the | numbers they needed to even cover their RnD costs. I doubt it | will be a commercial success. | | When you say "good enough for movie watching", I'll say that'll | never ever happen with electrophoresis. You can't violate | physics. Either a pigment particle moves slowly and stably or | it moves fast and is unstable. You'll never be able to get | both. That's why newer technologies by various startups like | ClearInk sacrifice the bi-stability in order to get fast video | speeds. But look at the market response, the market isn't | exactly embracing that either. Venture capitalists aren't | exactly eager to fund the billions needed to create new display | tech when they could invest in some new internet services | startup or AI/ML startup instead. | | As for A), these are all emissive technologies. They will by | their physics always be distinguishable from paper. As to | whether you'll care or not, that is something I can't predict. | gnicholas wrote: | What do you think of ACEP v2? | | https://goodereader.com/blog/e-paper/e-ink-has-developed- | ace... | kalleboo wrote: | > _these are all emissive technologies_ | | LCD doesn't have to be emissive. Black-and-white LCDs are | most often not. It's unlikely but not impossible for there to | be some breakthrough in colors LCDs | gdubya wrote: | TL;DR: no, because physics! :) | gego wrote: | I did buy the little ( boox poke 3) and the big boox note air, | mainly to do some reading and drawing on the go. | | What I also used it for during the lockdown was to switch it for | the tablets my kids use to control their screen time (not so much | fun in black and white) while allowing them to listen to music | and audio books... | | I like this trend also because I observe myself using the device | different than my mobile or tablet... I am just starting out but | I think it definitely has a niche to fill. | rvz wrote: | I was interested in purchasing a ReMarkable tablet last year then | realised the ReMarkable 2 just released months ago and was very | surprised that to see that they still don't have a color e-ink | version. | | Until then, I am skipping it since I don't think it is worth the | price. | | Downvoters: So I disagreed with the HN hivemind with a point I | made about saving money for a better version and now I get | downvoted for wrongthink? So somehow, this device is worth $400 | to spend on a 32 bit machine with 8 GB of space and 1 GB of RAM? | | That is more like spending $400 on an over powered Raspberry Pi 2 | just to read ebooks. (In black and white). You also might as well | buy the latest iPad then. | CandyFace wrote: | Why you would be surprised baffles me. There are only a few | e-ink tablets with color and they're all small and expensive. | Setting that aside, they're not focusing (that much) on e-book | comic reading, their focus is note taking, drawing and pdf | reading. I use mine to do all three things and it works | excellent, couldn't be happier. The remarkable is expensive no | doubt but it's a much better device at what it does than an | ipad or any other tablet for that matter if you ask me. | | I can't comment on the other tablets mentioned her as I haven't | used anything else but ipad previously and now the remarkable | 1. gen. | teorema wrote: | I love eink devices but got turned off by the first couple of | generations because they always underdelivered with PDF display, | which seemed like a central use case to me. I should be able to | open a random graphics-heavy PDF and have it display perfectly | (ignoring color) and in a reasonable amount of time for an eink | device to be worth it to me. | | This has made me want to revisit them but I don't think I'd want | to purchase one without being able to stress test in person. | gspr wrote: | I understand that. I gotta say I was blown away with how well | the RM2 handles complex PDFs. | | Edit: As a stress test, I just opened the most complex PDF I | had on my computer - | http://mirrors.ctan.org/graphics/pgf/base/doc/pgfmanual.pdf . I | think it works really well on the RM2. The gradients in some of | the fancier features look ugly, but other than that everything | is quite readable, and flipping pages is quite spiffy (I know | some ordinary computer PDF readers sometimes have noticable | loading times for certain pages in this document). | efficax wrote: | The latest kindles are great with pdfs, that was my main use | for them in grad school. I haven't tried the newer eink tablets | though | tluyben2 wrote: | I use the Boox with papers (so almost only PDFs) on the | internal reader and on Android readers; it works really well. | In the end I keep using the internal reader because it has | split view for me to scribble notes next to every page. | Disclaimer: I am older with glasses but not reading glasses; I | read fine with incredibly small fonts; I prefer it that way. So | YMMV but for me and for PDFs it is an ideal device for sure. If | the built-in reader is not good enough, you just get one from | the Play Store; there are enough very good ones there. | ducleonctor wrote: | Using a HLTE202N to type this, that phone has changed how I view | the web on mobile. | | Textual information is perceived more clearly and less | noisy/biased due to E Ink screen. | | Great for navigation under sunlight and lasts very long with | backlight disabled. | | It's always a small shock to temporarily use a regular | Android/iPhone, so noisy and glaring in my eyes. | | Wouldn't want to switch back to an OLED phone. Only reason would | be color video/photo viewing. | codethief wrote: | > Later this month I'll take a look at Supernote which already | has a enthusiastic community and promises to have a rich API for | 3rd parties to explore and expand. | | I tried the Remarkable 2 for a month but ended up returning it | and ordering the Supernote A5X instead - I couldn't be happier! | Its main advantages (IMO): | | - The Supernote acts as a regular USB mass storage device, so | syncing files (w/o resorting to the cloud) is not as hard as with | the RM2 (which serves a really buggy web interface over USB, | pretending to be an ethernet device). Sure, the RM2 gives you SSH | access but that doesn't help much because it's using a shitty | proprietary file system, so you can't just scp your documents but | need to convert them first. | | - The Supernote comes with much better PDF reading and annotation | capabilities. (The RM2 has pretty much none.) | | - The Supernote's soft non-glass surface is more comfortable for | long writing sessions - writing on it feels like writing with a | gel pen. Plus you'll never need to replace your pen tips as | they're made from ceramic. | | - The Supernote A5X is running Android instead of a barebones | Linux system, meaning that it comes with more features out of the | box and it'll be much easier to extend it in the future when | Ratta opens up their platform. (Sure, you can "hack" your RM2 but | the chances that the next official update will then completely | brick your device are rather high - /r/RemarkableTablet/ is full | of these stories.) | | - The company behind the Supernote actually values the | community's input, see https://www.reddit.com/r/Supernote | dhucerbin wrote: | I learned that 9-10 inches is to small to annotate pdfs so I | decided against remarkable or supernote a5. To be honest, most | science-y documents I read by the computer, because I try to | use knowledge right away in some notebook and/or repl. | | But then I noticed that I also read substantial amount of soft | skill/self help/popscience books and they're easily obtainable | in epubs. I pulled te trigger and bought supernote a6x. It size | is perfect. I can read and annotate on the go, I can jot during | coffee breaks. I take notes on the meetings and then I can put | supernote on the stand beside monitor and see bullet | points/todo lists for this day. | | Supernote support and community is very helpful and constant | upgrades take user requests into account. | michaelmior wrote: | Thanks for sharing. I got the reMarkable 1 pretty early and | I've been debating ordering the reMarkable 2. I've heard almost | exclusively good things about it, but right now I'm happy | enough with the original device. I hadn't heard of Supernote | until seeing this comment, but it's definitely something to | keep an eye on when I think about upgrading. | | I'm not sure what you mean when you say the RM2 has "pretty | much none" when it comes to PDF reading and annotation | capabilities. That's pretty much exclusively what I use my RM1 | device for and it works great. | | EDIT: Wow. Looked at the A5X and for the price compared to the | RM2, it's very enticing. (Once you throw in the folio and the | pen for the RM2, the A5X is comparable if not cheaper.) Since | my old Kindle Keyboard died a while back, I haven't replaced | it. Looks like the A5X can also read Kindle books which is a | huge draw for me. Do you know if there's any API that allows me | to write my own utilities to sync with the A5X? Specifically, I | want to be able to send PDFs to the device programmatically | that will be eventually synced the next time I use it. | boudin wrote: | I don't use those features but currently you can sync it | using Ratta's own cloud (which is optional by the way, no | obligation to create an account), dropbox or email. Otherwise | you can copy files via USB. There's no APIs that i know off | and currently the device is not hackable so there's no | alternative software. | michaelmior wrote: | Thanks! Syncing via Dropbox would not be my first choice, | but probably sufficient for my use case. I'll definitely | have to keep an eye on this :) | codethief wrote: | > I'm not sure what you mean when you say the RM2 has "pretty | much none" when it comes to PDF reading and annotation | capabilities. | | Well, all you can basically do is scribble within a PDF. The | RM2 doesn't offer proper PDFs annotations and it doesn't even | come close to the Supernote in terms of other useful features | like bookmarking, digests, etc. | | > EDIT: Wow. Looked at the A5X and for the price compared to | the RM2, it's very enticing. | | Yup, exactly. It seems more expensive upon first sight but | it's actually a pretty good deal. | | > Do you know if there's any API that allows me to write my | own utilities to sync with the A5X? Specifically, I want to | be able to send PDFs to the device programmatically that will | be eventually synced the next time I use it. | | This is exactly what I'm waiting for, too! My hope is that | once they open up their platform I'll be able to install the | Syncthing Android app and sync my Supernote with all my other | devices over WiFi. | michaelmior wrote: | > RM2 doesn't offer proper PDFs annotations | | This is true and I don't really mind that personally | although having read up a bit more on the Supernote, the | annotations it generates do seem much nicer. | | > it's actually a pretty good deal | | Pricing seems about the same really. Especially when you | consider the bundle of table, folio, and pen together for | each. I was disappointed to see that the standard Supernote | pen does not include an eraser and the LAMY pen which does | lacks the ceramic tip and instead requires replacing nibs | just like the reMarkable pen. | gpm wrote: | > Sure, you can "hack" your RM2 but the chances that the next | official update will then completely brick your device are | rather high - /r/RemarkableTablet/ is full of these stories | | No... they're approximately 0. | | The next update will wipe out your modifications, everything | outside of the home directory is wiped, but the device will | still work. | | People bricking their devices are people actively doing things | that brick their devices, not updates coming along and bricking | them later. | teruakohatu wrote: | How is it better than the remarkable? | codethief wrote: | I updated my post! :) | fossuser wrote: | Interesting - thanks for writing up the differences. | | For me, lack of android is more of a feature for this kind of | device. | clvx wrote: | I would like remarkable 2 or any of these devices to be used as a | pen tablet in an easy way with the different OS. It would make | much easier drawing diagrams while working in a presentation. | Even better if they at some point can be hooked to some kind of | software for collaboration editing. How I see myself using it. | Prepping diagrams early in the morning, pulling that on the | computer, keep editing while presenting to my coworkers, let my | coworkers add any other information(even better using their own | devices). | CosmicShadow wrote: | I'm always super intrigued by the reMarkable 2, but I think it's | because it paints an image of the type of person I think it'd be | cool to be, someone who can just write down notes and draw stuff | with a really cool, slim device. Someone who carries around | moleskines and uses them, instead of just buying so many of them | in different shapes and leaving them in a drawer packed to the | brim with notebooks. | | The problem keeps coming back to the fact that I'm absolutely not | the type of person who wants to carry that thing around | everywhere and who likes or is good at hand writing or drawing. I | realize I won't base all my life and processes around this one | device that is also supposedly hard to get info off of easily | into things like OneNote. If I was somewhere without a computer, | then I wouldn't be carrying this big tablet on me. I've bought | enough tablets and laptops with writable screens and MS surfaces | over the years to know that I still never drew or took notes with | the pen, but I still keep buying them hoping I will. | | The thing is still so cool and I want it, but maybe I'll wait for | version 3 or 4 and extra disposable income that will go to waste | on it! | lifeisstillgood wrote: | I have put Working Copy (a git client with a half decent editor | - ie it does not do autocorrection) on my phone and if the | moment strikes I put a note into one or two books that I | Promise To Publish Real Soon now. | | was out jogging today and had a thought and popped it in. is in | gthub right now so i think of it as safe. | | But yes. I completely understand - i too want to be one of | those people. | | in fact watching this i thought there is a market for business | pads - that look like your are taking notes and updating | tickets not thumbing thorugh facebook in a meeting. | | Slap a specialised JIRA client on this and I think you have a | package winner. | eloisant wrote: | I'm actually using my moleskine quite a bit, but it's | frustrating because everything is chronological, all mixed up. | I'm not using it enough to justify having different ones for | all activities. And when it's full and I get a new one I never | have have my older one at hand, it stays at home. | | So this kind of tablet looks really nice... | | The reason I prefer to write on my moleskin rather than my | laptop is because if I have my laptop, I get distracted and I | do stuff I'm not supposed to. | | Additionally I find it rude to be on your laptop when you're in | a meeting, because people might think you're doing other stuff, | and also because having your screen between you and other | people creates a kind of "barrier". | ChuckMcM wrote: | I've got a ReMarkable 2 and love it. I also have written and | sketched in notebooks so there is that habit. But a couple of | things in your comment made me say "hmm". | | This stood out _"... and who likes or is good at hand writing | or drawing. "_ | | Over the years many folks have seen me writing in my notebook | and said, "Wow I wish I could make notes like that." It | motivated me for a time to carry around copies of pages from my | early notebook notes which compare unfavorably to cro-magnon | cave drawings :-). I would explain to them they are written for | an audience of one (me) and serve to help me recall details | that I might otherwise forget, so there isn't anyone judging or | evaluating them. At the same time, the more you write and draw, | you tend to get more capable (this is especially true if you're | somewhat self critical of your own results). | | So I would agree that something like the ReMarkable is a big | chunk of change to spend on something you don't feel you would | use, but consider that a 5 pack of quadrule or lined | composition notebooks is a couple of dollars/euros when school | starts and can be thrown away. A stack of those, a variety of | writing instruments (I like 1mm gel pens or the BIC 4 color | pens, but others like mechanical pencils or roller ball type | pens) And be intentional about writing things down for a few | weeks (the various habit books suggest six as a minimum number | of weeks but its an experiment right?) | | Then at the end of your experiment go back and review your | notebook(s) and compare your awareness and "presence" in that | time with a time where you were not taking notes. | | My guess is that either you will say, "this is a good thing, I | should do this more" or you will say "interesting but not my | cup of tea." Either way, you have a good understanding of | yourself and how note taking and notebooks fit into your life. | At which point the decision to buy something expensive or not | has the backing of your lived experience of whether or not you | find it useful. | 99_00 wrote: | >instead of just buying so many of them in different shapes and | leaving them in a drawer packed to the brim with notebooks. | | That was me until I started bullet journaling. My notebook | becomes whatever I need at the time. Todo list, calendar, | journal. Flexibility with structure. | edmundsauto wrote: | This is pretty accurate, from someone who just got one as a | gift. They are useful devices, however your criticism is spot | on. | | That said, a couple big advantages I haven't seen advertised: | | - I don't have a dozen notebooks around, just one - easy to | start a new notebook, plus the centralization, is sort of an | "organized by default" mode - I can't take notes on my | computer, so it's either this or paper - distraction free is | good, and the physicality of the pen and screen is a much | better experience than an iPad | | Your other criticisms are valid and a little too accurate. It's | still a useful device, there's just a bit of a premium price | because of the fancy factors you discussed. | sork_hn wrote: | One of the things I love about mine - I never realized that I | get 'anxiety' about wasting paper or space on paper. Being | able to write and keep a few lines per page has been great. | edmundsauto wrote: | And being able to move text around once you write it! | plutonorm wrote: | You have different selves working at different time scales. | Your problem is that your short term self is winning out | against your long term self. The remedy is to learn to hold | your attention where you want it, so when the short term self | directs your attention to the line of cocaine you can keep it | on the long term goal instead. To get better at directing your | attention... meditate, particularly deeply focusing on a | sensation. Practice practice practice. | d0mine wrote: | You can meditate (it possible that it works for somebody). It | is easier to create an environment where you don't have to | exercise the control most of the time e.g., don't buy/put | cookies on the kitchen table unless you intend to eat them. | Though one doesn't exclude another one. | | Make it easy for your "short-term" self to do the right (from | the "long-term" self point of view) thing. | tomc1985 wrote: | I keep mine at my desk and use it for relatively germaine note- | taking and ideation... | | Why you gotta be a hipster about it? | jmspring wrote: | I'm in no way cool or carry moleskins, but for some dumb reason | I thought doing a second Masters in an area unrelated to | anything I do - my first is in computer engineering, this new | one is GeoEngineering - would be a good idea. I'm someone that | needs to write thoughts and notes on paper and then construct a | doc around such. I have a Remarkable2 and it was great for note | taking, it was also great for hand writing out some advanced | math courses / problems I had to revisit. | | In some classes where we used Excel, I would do a mix of an | iPad Pro (with pencil) and on the computer excel. | | I like the simplicity of the Remarkable2, but it doesn't handle | all my needs, but it does many. | jamra wrote: | There is a book called Visual Thinking by Williemien Brand | which goes over drawing basic things. I love it because the | author did amazing research into how to draw things with the | least effort. I use it to supplement my notes. | | The beautiful part of the remarkable 2 is that you can erase | and redraw. You can also copy and paste. When making diagrams, | the arrows will look identical. Recently, they added zooming | in. | | I used to take notes on paper. I bought thick, quality paper. I | used a nice Japanese made fountain pen. I loved taking notes | that way. I still miss parts of it. | | When I started, my writing was not very beautiful, but I used a | couple of cheats that helped. I write in all caps and I write | quite small so that there is some padding above and below my | letters. I write slowly so as to have consistent lettering. | Even if they are imperfect, they look consistent. The focus | should be on letter spacing. | | Before covid, people used to come up to my desk and say it was | the most beautiful writing they have ever seen. It wasn't, but | the techniques do work. | | As far as the feel of the notebook. I let my kids play with it. | They love it. | ed_elliott_asc wrote: | I bought one and work from home and it suits me really well. | | I have never been more organised, I used to scribble notes on | random bits of paper that would get lost - now o can refer back | to meetings weeks ago. | DenisM wrote: | Put a stack of 3x4 index cards in you back pocket, and write | thing down as needed. In the evening, (eg when you pull | keys/wallet out of the pocket) review the cards briefly and | toss the used once into trash unless you really need to keep | one. | | This is a low-commitment device that still achieves half the | benefits of _really_ writing things down. | fastball wrote: | Shameless plug, but if you like note-taking on index cards | but are still looking for a slightly more digital solution to | the problem, we've[1] built an online note-taking platform | that is based around digital markdown note-cards, which is a | bit different from most other digital solutions which are | usually document or bullet-list based. I realize that many on | HN want to "own" their data a little more than you typically | expect of a cloud-platform, but you owning your notes is very | important to us which is why we've spelled it out in our | T&Cs[2] and why we have a publicly-accessible API[3] for | maximum flexibility. | | [1] https://supernotes.app | | [2] https://supernotes.app/terms/ | | [3] https://api.supernotes.app/docs/swagger | fencepost wrote: | This got some discussion as the "Hipster PDA" some years back | (originally 2004 from Merlin Mann), along with some low-cost | options to simplify managing it - multicolor cards, bullet | journal rules, cutting out card-sized pieces of plastic from | a cheap folder to make a "cover" and of course various sizes | of binder clips. | | I found a medium to large binder clip to work better than | hole punching and a ring - you can't just open it up and use | it while standing, but it holds together better and easier to | add/remove cards. | | A big advantage of this over journals (Moleskine, Field | Notes, etc) is that there's no mental block of "I don't want | to write something stupid or trivial in my journal/notebook." | jrm4 wrote: | If you want something _slightly_ more techy; the ONLY app | that I absolutely cannot live without is Blitzmail on Android | (I believe there 's an Apple equivalent?) | | It's simply an an ultra-simplified one destination email | client. | | One button on your homescreen opens up a little text input | window. Hit send, and it emails yourself. That's it, and it | has been absolutely life changing, I've retained _so much_ | and simplified so many things. Ideas, scheduling, notes, etc. | disruptthelaw wrote: | What is your workflow to process all the emails to | yourself? | hypertele-Xii wrote: | I use Telegram to take notes on my phone. You can "message | yourself", they changed it to "saved messages" but it's | essentially just you chatting with yourself. Each message | is a note, beginning with "Topic :", e.g. "Game design :". | | Then about once a month I copy paste the whole chat into a | text file on my workstation PC, date and archive it, and | clear the chat. Telegram includes the exact time and date | of each message in the paste, and my consistent "tagging" | of the notes with the topic means that I can | programmatically parse the text files later to organize | them, maybe on my website. | | After years of note-taking in various forms, I find that I | rarely actually need to peruse my notes archive. It's the | act of taking notes itself which helps with retention of | ideas. | smusamashah wrote: | There should be card size rugged reMarkable mini to put in | pocket and take notes anywhere. | fragmede wrote: | Not to make it personal but: Do you do this? How do you find | it? It's a simple and alluring solution plus I've been | looking at the remarkable2, but this answer sounds like doing | the dishes. I like a empty kitchen sink, but I honestly pay | someone to come in twice week to have that, because the low- | rent solution of just doing the dishes is beyond me. I'm | never going to sit down and review the cards, and then the | benefits of going _digital_. Globally instantly accessible by | others, indexed, impossible to lose, etc. | DenisM wrote: | Off and on. Started on it again just yesterday, hence my | comment. | | >I'm never going to sit down and review the cards | | Well, don't sit down then. Standing up flip through the | cards you filled during the day and toss them into garbage, | unless one is really important. You're strictly better off | than writing down nothing at all during the day, which is | the default state for most people. | eloisant wrote: | But what kind of things to you write? | BlueDingo wrote: | I do this. Todo items that pop into my head, little notes | about ongoing projects. Things I want to remember or | process but aren't an immediate task. | | Later in the day when I pull them out, many do get | trashed. Lots of Todo items never make it to my digital | Todo list because my brain processed them mostly in the | background during the day. I find the physical nature of | the cards means I can't avoid that processing step. The | times I revert back to digital first, my notes end up | everywhere (I input them in the fastest way, rather than | finding the right place) and immediately begin rotting | because now I have remember and force myself to condense | and organize rather than it occurring naturally. | nemosaltat wrote: | When I was in the Navy I carried a little memoranda pad in my | left breast pocket. I'd take notes each day, at the beginning | of each new day, I'd carry any necessary information from the | previous day to the next page and then fold the previous page | along the diagonal, alternating the folds right and left each | day. | | The effects of pulling out a notepad and jotting notes are | markedly different than pulling out a phone or tablet- | especially in a conversation or meeting. IME a phone signals | disengagement, while a notepad signals the opposite. When I | pulled out my pad, I could see body language and word choices | change almost immediately. If it was a positive or neutral | conversation, people tended to show appreciation for my | interest in what was being said. If it was a negative | interaction, people started to be much more careful about | what they were saying. | | Now I carry an attache case and use larger, more professional | looking, notebooks. Even in the age of Zoom, I angle my | camera to ensure it's obvious I'm taking notes. Sure, it's an | extra step to digitize the important stuff, but I think it's | worth it. | redsummer wrote: | What's the state of digitizing notes from an image? I mean, | can you convert text and simple diagrams. And maybe just | leave anything more complicated as an image. | | The next macOS can select text in images: | https://appleinsider.com/articles/21/06/07/macos- | montereys-l... | | ... but that's not handwritten text | the_af wrote: | > _The effects of pulling out a notepad and jotting notes | are markedly different than pulling out a phone or tablet- | especially in a conversation or meeting. IME a phone | signals disengagement_ | | This! It matters even if you _are_ paying attention; in | this day and age pulling a phone strongly signals | disengagement. Even if you 're actually the most attentive | note taker, the rest of the attendees don't know this... | and once one person signals disinterest, many will follow. | It's like you're "giving them permission" to stop paying | attention. | NikolaNovak wrote: | I've noticed that early on; 15 years ago, I was keeping | notes on a "feature phone with sliding keyboard". I was | pulled by my manager for being disrespectful after the | meeting; I showed him the notes and demonstrated that I was | by far the most attention / had the best retention / was | most involved in the meeting, but still... the message was | - it looks unprofessional, stop it. | | Thing is: | | * My handwriting sucks (I literally can't read my own; I'm | 42yo - don't tell me to practice / it'll improve, just | don't be that arrogant ignoramus ;). | | * I'll never be organized on paper. Ever. My circles are | potatoes, my lines are squiggles, and everything is all | over the place and disheartening to read (I love | whiteboards but it's a whole other thing, somehow) | | * I love love love my typed notes. I can type fast and | asynchronously while I listen and look at the speaker. I | can search them, retain them, review them, summarize them. | | But I'm aware that I'll always look disengaged on my laptop | compared to somebody with their notebook :-/ | jagger27 wrote: | I wonder if something like old school Graffiti (from Palm | OS) would work for you. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graffiti_(Palm_OS) | NikolaNovak wrote: | I did use Palm devices extensively, and found Graffiti | shockingly intuitive - it took me no time at all to be | fully fluent in it. All the way up to Palm Treo, I loved | them and couldn't figure out why people went Gaga over | iPhone when it came out - I felt that I mostly had that | same thing for years already (I recognize there are | important differences in retrospective, not the least | that iPhone was fashionable and cool to use;) | | I would definitely work better with Graffiti-style input | rather than full writing recognition; but: | | a) I am a dorky minority - pretty much always a negative | focus group for these things :P | | b) even for me it's not ideal and modern lightweight | laptops are a better solution -- I type at speed of | speech these days; I don't think I could ever write / | squiggle that fast. | MivLives wrote: | Does anything modern support this? Does the remarkable? | Because this would be killer for me. I have terrible hand | writing and being able to type without hauling out a | keyboard would be great for notes. | eloisant wrote: | There is an Android keyboard called Graffiti Pro that | does exactly that. | | I don't think there is anything equivalent on the | Remarkable, I think the idea is handwriting then if you | need you can OCR it. | asoneth wrote: | I've noticed that as well -- no matter how engaged | someone is, if there is a screen that they can see but | others can't then it is an information imbalance that is | disruptive to the normal flow of conversation. It's like | hearing half a phone conversation -- your brain works | overtime trying to reconstruct the part it can't see. And | it makes some sense; when I am talking to a person and | they keep glancing at their laptop, phone, or watch it's | exceedingly off-putting and they seem disengaged even in | cases when other evidence indicates they are paying | attention. | | I've similarly noticed that interacting with someone | wearing a bluetooth headset or smart glasses is off- | putting no matter how much they indicate they are paying | attention and not watching or listening to something I | can't see. | | Like you, I prefer to type my notes. I've found that | angling the screen down so that I can't see it either and | then maintaining normal eye contact with everyone makes | the problem mostly go away. Possibly because I'm not | constantly breaking eye contact to furtively glance at a | glowing screen that they can't see. Or possibly because I | wasn't paying as much attention as I felt like I was -- | there is some research that indicates that people who can | see a screen or TV while they are accomplishing a task | often significantly underestimate how much time they | spent looking at it and how much it negatively impacted | their task performance. | NikolaNovak wrote: | Agreed; that one thing, has actually been made easier | with Covid-induced remote work at my project. On Zoom, | people don't know I'm typing furiously - I'm a touch | typer and can do reasonable amount of formatting/bullet | lists without looking down, so I can look at and engage | with and react to person maintaining eye contact while my | fingers do their own thing :). | [deleted] | akiselev wrote: | I haven't had a chance to use the remarkable 2 in an in- | person meeting (covid) but with the stylus/pen and its | shape, it's really obvious that it's not a consumption | device. If it's flat on the conference room table, | everyone in the room with decent eyesight will identify | it as a monochromatic screen for note taking (as long as | the pen is in the picture). Depending on camera angle, | it's also obvious in video chats and easy to screen share | using their app. Other thoughts: | | * Remarkable's handwriting recognition is some of the | best I've seen (but that's a low bar). Works well even on | doctor chicken scratch but it's tied to their cloud | stuff. The calligraphy pen setting helps with the | aesthetics of bad hand writing | | * This is why the remarkable has been a game changer for | me. The pen selection tool allows me to draw an arbitrary | shape and selects all strokes that fall within it. I can | then drag or copy/cut/paste the selection, which I use | all the time to rearrange my diagrams and copy/paste bits | that I draw with a straightedge as a template. The big | missing pieces are shape drawing tools and an infinite | canvas so you can infinite scroll to the sides to keep | drawing but with pinch to zoom, I usually just zoom way | into a page when I open a notebook i know is going to be | huge. Even zoomed out the resolution on the display makes | it really readable (I can barely identify individual | "pixels" with a 10x loupe) | | * If the process of hand drawing/writing/annotating | doesn't appeal to you or help with retention, the | remarkable 2 is a really expensive ebook reader... with | ssh. | behnamoh wrote: | I enjoyed this review of Onyx Note Air by a grad student: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELXnytHZY2c | | It seems Note Air has potential but is not priced well. | You might think reMarkable 2 is also expensive, but with | Note Air you have to buy additional stylus too. The video | above shows how Note Air works with reMarkable 2 Marker | and Staedtler stylus. | | I personally think if latency and price would get solved, | Note Air has much more potential than rM2. I couldn't | believe they actually put a lot of thought into designing | the software that run Note Air, but the guy in the video | explains things in detail. | adhesive_wombat wrote: | If all you want is an ereader with ssh, a Kobo with | Koreader will do that for you. They just run Linux, so | it's quite a fun device for hacking around in. | | Plus Koreader itself is in Lua and is relatively easy to | make changes to. | Foobar8568 wrote: | >My handwriting sucks (I literally can't read my own; I'm | 42yo - don't tell me to practice / it'll improve, just | don't be that arrogant ignoramus ;). | | I am close to 40, 2 - 3 years ago, I re-practiced | handwriting with my daughter who wanted to learn (out of | school) writing. To my surprise, my handwriting did | improve and I was actually surprised by the result | (cursive, I am French), hers was miles ahead of mine but | really I was damn surprised by how effective it was. | | I used to have teachers that refused to correct my copies | because of my handwriting, so it's never too late. | X6S1x6Okd1st wrote: | It'd be interesting to try hooking up some basic storage | to a keyboard and just touch type without having a screen | handy | jodrellblank wrote: | And make sure the keyboard is a chording one, so you | don't have to look while touch-typing, and you get: | https://www.friedmanarchives.com/dataegg/ | georgeecollins wrote: | That's so funny- that makes me think: 2007 (or so) a | manager asked me not to use a Windows Pen Tablet in a | meeting because it wasn't respectful. | | 2011 Every senior manager brings an iPad to meetings and | seem to get distracted. | | 2015 (Tech co) Everybody brings an MacBook Air or a | MacBook pro to every meeting | | 2018 (Entertainment Co) Any electronic device is | considered disrespectful in a meeting, especially phones. | Normal_gaussian wrote: | and this is why I love remote work in a tight team. | Cameras are really only on for standups / outside of team | meetings / coffee breaks. Instead we do _whatever we | think is appropriate_ during meetings. | | I normally make notes on paper and use the computer to | fact check myself and the conversation (where it | matters). It makes everything waay faster. | NikolaNovak wrote: | You missed 2014 - Business Partners bring in their | BlackBerry Passports :-> | moonbug wrote: | still using mine. | throwawayboise wrote: | I think there is a spectrum. |Disengaged | <----------------> Engaged| |Phone Laptop | Pen/Paper| | | So even though your phone had a keyboard, it still | _looked_ like you were texting instead of paying | attention. A small laptop would have probably had a | better reception. But I agree, nothing beats taking notes | on paper as far as giving the _impression_ of being | engaged and attentive. | athenot wrote: | To add to that, with a laptop (tactile keyboard), it's | also easier to type notes while maintaining eye contact. | That goes a long way to show respect and look engaged. | | On a side-note, I do this on video calls too, keeping the | window near where the camera is located so that there is | still eye contact. | tracedddd wrote: | I've found the disorganization of writing is actually a | benefit. I have a remarkable and I put almost everything | in a single organizational notebook. There's no pressure | to do things right, no fretting about space or making | clean shapes, just thought dumps and open notes.. which I | condense down later on a computer if I ever decide I | actually want to "go forward" with an idea. Works for me | given I feel a friction with long term cleanly organized | notes that sometimes inhibits the process altogether. | Johnny555 wrote: | My handwriting sucks too, and much of it is nearly | illegible, but I find that I have much better retention | if I keep written notes rather than typing. | | Even if some of my notes are difficult (or even | impossible) to read, it's still sufficient to help | remember what I felt so notable that I wrote it down. | | I realize that everyone's not the same, but studies have | shown that writing leads to better conceptual recall (but | typing tends to record more information) | _carbyau_ wrote: | My wife's version of a shopping list is a bunch of lines | of "running writing Ws". The typed approximation being | | Wwwwwwwww | | Wwwwwwwww | | ...etc | | At the shops, I have no idea but she knows what she | wrote. | nofunsir wrote: | Exactly what I do. Even made a simple 3x5 holder that is two | pieces of leather riveted on one short edge. If needed, I | pick up colored 3x5s to color code. For example, yellow = my | Home Depot shopping list, or measurements notes. | ip26 wrote: | Great comment that also gets right to the appeal of the | moleskines (and GoPros). Everyone wants to be this person who | is so flooded with genius insight every thought must be | transcribed, or whose athletic prowess is so unmatched every | minute should be recorded. Of course in reality, that's mostly | not how either one works. | | For my part, all my best ideas are incredibly simple, abstract, | and writing it down is both incredibly difficult and also | worthless. Sometimes I doodle to work through an issue, but | that takes little more than a napkin and a crayon. | | All that said I really, really love eink. I could almost buy an | RM2 just to support eink development. | musingsole wrote: | The remarkable tablet allows me to go sit under a tree and | design system diagrams or draw mindmaps. And then recover them | for reference later. It's particularly helpful for work- | thinking. For personal thoughts, having written/drawn them is | often enough to cement them and I'll reference them | months/years later as a novelty. | | But the core of all this is that the sitting-under-a-tree-habit | came after the device. Before, it was a bit of a romantic idea | I'd tried with moleskines, but it didn't really scratch my | itches. | samstave wrote: | You know what would be a dope addition to something like the | remarkable: | | Voice memos, so you can add some audible context to each | diagram | jeremyleach wrote: | Great idea. | nxpnsv wrote: | Are you me, you sound like me. I feel the pain. | CosmicShadow wrote: | They say don't sell a product, sell a lifestyle, a future, | possible version of one's self that they want to be. | | These guys nailed it! | erickhill wrote: | Might I recommend an Apple Newton? ;) | | Small(ish), syncable (bit of a learning curve to do so, but it | is possible), and even comes with a physical keyboard if you | want to really type things out rather than just use a stylus. | | In my experience its OCR software is on-par with the | Remarkable, if not better. | | Good times. | samstave wrote: | Omg, I am the king of moleskin unused notebooks. | | What was awesome though was when my then 3 year old daughter | found one of the moleskins and a pen and did a bunch of | scribbles on every 10 pages or so. | | I truly love that little moleskin. | | I just recently (last week) bought an outdoor log with graph | paper and some other logs.... | | Your comment makes me want to prove you (myself) wrong and | actually use it. | | I've always been impressed with the. Various engineers I have | worked with, like John Blair of nerflix... he is really fn | today keeping a solid tech journal | CosmicShadow wrote: | I literally have this comic on my wall: | https://poorlydrawnstore.com/products/nice-notebook-print | | I also just bought a super mini and thick notebook for $10 | that I haven't used, but was just so cool looking. I still | feel like an idiot for buying it, but maybe I will use it | someday. | deckard1 wrote: | I have a $2 notebook from Muji sitting in my drawer but | it's too nice to write in. It's $2!! | | Japan is on a whole other level with writing and | stationary. Go to a Tokyo Hands or Muji and you'll feel | like the type of person that should be writing constantly. | I can't imagine we would fetishize writing so much if | computers didn't exist. | cstejerean wrote: | That's perfect. That's exactly how I felt about nice | notebooks and that's why the digital version is so much | better for me. The freedom to erase and reorganize removes | that anxiety. | xsmasher wrote: | Voice commands like "Hey Siri, add X to my | [grocery/hardware/project] list" and "Hey Siri, remind me | [tomorrow at 10] to do X" have made me more effective at pretty | much everything. | vogon_laureate wrote: | You described my problem so well. I have aspirations to be the | sort of person that makes stuff like this: | https://www.buzzfeed.com/stephaniecristea/14-study-notes-tha... | | But I don't and I won't because that's just not how I work | however much I'd like to. And that's OK. In fact, it's good to | accept that about one's self. | | Now that I know I have ADHD, I at least have an explanation why | my desire to be something I'm not has always failed, but even | without the diagnosis, we all have our personality quirks that | mean that certain things just won't work for us. It's nice to | have beautiful notebooks to give away as presents for other | people though. :-) | sergiomattei wrote: | Wow, I feel as if I wrote this. This is exactly how I feel: | I've tried doing this many times and always fail at the note | taking thing. | | Lately I'm using Notion though for journaling and I really | enjoy it. I'm keeping up a journaling streak. | cstejerean wrote: | For comparison I rarely use the pen on my iPad Pro. I think | partially because of all the distractions, as soon as I grab my | iPad there's lots of other stuff I could be doing other than | taking notes. And partially because the writing on glass never | felt right. So it's been more of an occasional use when I | really need to sketch something. | | I was on the fence for the RM2 for a while for the same reasons | you mentioned. Would I really use it? | | Well I got it recently after trying a friend's and I've | surprised myself by using it daily. We'll see if the habit | sticks but so far the killer feature for me compared to a | notebook is being able to erase, move text around and insert | pages. | | This makes me much more likely to just start jotting stuff down | without being worried about "wasting" pages in a notebook. | | By the way the device I hear comes with a 30 day trial period | for this very reason. Lots of people don't know whether they | would really use it. So you can order it, find out how it fits | into your life and return it if it doesn't. | CosmicShadow wrote: | I've looked at it seriously a while back when it was on | presale, but it's definitely a heavy chunk of change, | especially since I'm Canadian and have to pay the exchange | rate prices. | | I do like the idea of no distractions and being able to move | stuff around and organize it, unlike with paper, but most of | my life is at home (since I'm self-employed) and I already | have a computer on all 3 floors of my house that I'm usually | at with OneNote and Notepad++ with a ton of tabs on each, so | I'm worried that I'll never really use it unless I want to | sit on the couch and focus, but then will I be wishing I had | all my subsequent notes and such already on OneNote and in my | various notepad++ tabs? What happens when I go back and sit | at my computer for the majority of the day where I do work, | play, research, side businesses etc.? Do I need some stand | and will I just be cross copying notes back and forth? | | Is it something I can comfortably hold and write on while | sitting on a couch, or on some random chair or while leaning | against a wall? Or am I going to be doing weird grips and | being forced to counterbalance my writing on a floating pad | if it's not sitting on a desk? I find writing in a small | notebook way harder if it's not just on a table, so even that | already worries me. Will I get less legible or not be able to | as effectively write on the entire surface area of the device | while holding it if not on a desk or having it setup on my | lap (which may not even be that feasible without some cushion | or stand)? | | A 30 day trial could definitely help me figure this out, but | I'm leaning towards the fact that it probably won't work out, | at least not with the current version and I'm always afraid I | won't commit the time I need to really test it in those first | 30 days, haha! | cstejerean wrote: | The hard back makes it like a clipboard so you could use it | on a couch or sitting anywhere really, but I mostly use it | for writing while at a table or my desk. I'd rather take | notes by hand than type though. Previous attempts to type | notes never worked out for long. Too many distractions on | the computer for me. | | If you're already heavily invested in taking notes in | OneNote then this probably won't help much due to the | overhead required to sync back and forth. | | Getting OneNote on the Remarkable would be awesome though, | I hope this will happen in some future version. | CoolGuySteve wrote: | The writing/drawing/painting experience of the Apple Pencil | would be massively improved if it had a small high resolution | haptic speaker similar to the Switch Joycons or Steam | Controller to emulate different drawing tools and surfaces. | Sanguinaire wrote: | I'm somewhat like you (aspiration-based notebook purchaser), | but I actually did buy a remarkable - both the original and V2. | | Bizarrely, I've ended up using the RM exclusively for work- | related notes, and still keep all my personal ideas in a paper | notebook. Aside from a subconscious desire to work through my | stationery backlog, I have no idea why. | | RM is nice to use and I'd definitely recommend to note-taking | gadget lovers, but the software quality prevents me from | calling it a more general must-buy device. | patrickdavey wrote: | Like you I'd wanted a remarkable but could never justify it. | Then a friend told me about the handshake crypto that was given | away to GitHub users back in 2019 https://handshake.org/claim/ | and how it was worth real money now. | | Anyway, I claimed the coins, transferred them into dollars | (just before the recent crash) and bought a remarkable for | "free". | | Honestly, it's a nice tablet, but, I'm glad I got it for free | ;) | kabdib wrote: | I've used a number of gadgets over the years (starting with an | Apple Newton), and none of my notes on them have survived. | | On the other hand, I've got boxes and boxes of notebooks | (Strathmore sketchpads and Moleskine-equivalents) that will | outlast me -- to say nothing about cloud providers, backup | media or outdated file formats -- unless I suffer a house fire | or natural disaster. | | Notebooks are cheap, and even terrible ones will last decades | with little or no care. You can toss them into backpacks, lend | them, get them (a little) wet, leave them in the sun, sit on | them, forget them at the coffee shop, and even lose them | permanently and basically not worry too much. If I was using a | $400 gadget instead, I'd never carry it to the places I | currently carry paper. My note-taking and scribbling would go | down. I'm not even going to talk about battery capacity | anxiety. | | The gadget-lover in me would probably be happy with one of | these things. My practical side and experience tells me that in | the long run they are more trouble than they're worth. | Johnny555 wrote: | I've been thinking of getting one (or something similar) since | I tend to write short-term notes on stickies and leave them on | my desk or monitor. I haven't found a computer based equivalent | that I like using as much as writing. | | This works well when I'm working 100% at home or at the office, | my notes are where I work, but my company plans to have a | hybrid workplace with employees working from the office 2 or 3 | days a week, now my notes will be scattered between home and | office. (well, worse, the office might move to a "hoteling" | desk format where no one has a permanent desk, so I can't leave | my notes on my desk at work). | | So one of the electronic paper products seems like a good | solution - write my notes in epaper, and I can access them from | work (or vice versa). | | Though they are still pretty expensive so more likely, I'll | just switch to keeping notes in a notebook that I carry back | and forth. | chevill wrote: | >hand writing or drawing. | | A few weeks of practicing 10 minutes a day or so will give you | good handwriting. | | A few weeks of a basic drawing course with a small amount of | practice will give you decent enough skills to get your ideas | down on paper. | | People naturally do the things they like to do. I actually | enjoy the process of writing with fountain pens, calligraphy, | taking notes, etc. Strangely, I also really enjoy the | experience of typing. | | Taking notes and drawing don't make me cool. Carrying a | notebook and a fountain pen made people think I was kind of | eccentric more than anything. Carrying an iPad Pro 12.9 with a | stylus made people think I was a geek. No one was mean about it | or anything, but it definitely doesn't make a person cool. Just | be who you are and do the things you enjoy. | | If you think you would enjoy writing/drawing, put a little bit | of effort into it and you will have pretty good results. | | As far as the e-ink tablets go, I'm hoping the large format | ones become more affordable and more polished. I would love to | have one but the value proposition vs an Ipad is terrible. | Single-purpose devices can frequently be better than a more | generalized device, but in the case of these E-ink tablets the | few things they do (reading, writing, drawing) generally offer | a worse experience than doing that same thing on an Ipad. The | only upsides are battery life and the e-ink screen. | colecut wrote: | I purchased one a couple months ago, and it has definitely | helped to 'become a different person' in that I have found a | joy in both handwriting notes and sketching that I never had | before. | | I downloaded some PDFs on how to sketch, and I can sketch right | there in the PDF along side the examples.. | | The futility of hand-written note taking was always my lack of | organization, but the auto syncing of this really helps in that | department. | | I can't say it is for everyone, but while I was definitely not | the target consumer for this device, I am more that person now | after buying it. I appreciate anything that pushes any of my | time from consumption to production, and this helps me to do | that. | canoebuilder wrote: | Links or recommendations for the sketching PDFs? | colecut wrote: | The book I am using and liking right now is How to Draw: | Sketch and Draw Anything, Anywhere with This Inspiring and | Practical Handbook, by Jake Spicer | JeremyNT wrote: | I have a similar but older device, the Likebook Mars. | | These no-name Chinese Android e-ink tablets are actually really | great devices, when it comes to hardware. Where they fail of | course is the questionable software. I find the Likebook actually | works well enough, but I'm sure it's got untold security issues | that prevent it from being useful for anything serious. | | I don't really understand why there really aren't any reputable | companies in the Android e-ink tablet space, and I also don't | understand why Google themselves seem to have absolutely no | interest in Android for this use case. An e-ink Pixel tablet | seems like it would be a real win. | cainxinth wrote: | > I don't really understand why there really aren't any | reputable companies in the Android e-ink tablet space, and I | also don't understand why Google themselves seem to have | absolutely no interest in Android for this use case. | | Just guessing, but maybe they did the market research and the | audience isn't big enough. After all, e-ink devices are | primarily for consuming large amounts of text, and most | peoples' reading these days is short form, multimedia content | (articles, blogs, lists, slideshows, social media posts, | explainer videos, etc.) which is better suited to existing | phones and tablets. | | I'm still among those who read book-length content, but far | less than I did in years past. I'd say the actual number of | words I read every year has gone up, but the number of 300+ | page books I read has gone down. | | The upside is, I'm much more selective about the books I do | read and mostly only read excellent ones. | pklausler wrote: | I preordered a rM2 and got it last October, and by November it | was in my dead tech drawer. It doesn't come close to the | experience of writing on top-quality blank notebooks with a good | pen, and without a backlight it kind of sucks as an e-reader. | echelon wrote: | > It doesn't come close to the experience of writing on top- | quality blank notebooks with a good pen | | We're all different, and I disagree. It's replaced all of my | notebooks and pens. | | I just wish it had a faster processor so that the UI was | snappier. | mrfusion wrote: | I want one but I don't know what I'd use it for. Weird problem to | have I guess. | res0nat0r wrote: | I'm in the same boat. If I could get Kindle e-books for free | alongside the physical purchase of a book on Amazon, and these | devices could import them I'd be all ears for a new toy to play | with. Alas, two things which will never happen. :( | growt wrote: | You're not alone. I really like ePaper and I like working | outside, but my handwriting is terrible and I'm faster typing | anyway. | wffurr wrote: | Handwriting gets better with practice. You didn't start out | typing fast either; you had to learn and practice. | jcelerier wrote: | my handwriting is also terrible yet this is so incredibly | better than notetaking on computer as soon as you have | graphs, e.g. here's my current page: | https://imgur.com/a/D0m4okF | xanaxagoras wrote: | I don't have any of these note taking e-ink devices but I plan to | get one eventually. I've been aware of both the Book Note and | reMarkable 2 but for whatever reason I've wanted to wait another | few generations and see how products in this space evolve. For | now I have an iPad Pro with paperlike. | | I followed a link at the bottom of this article to a product I'd | never heard of before, Supernote [1], and something there caught | my eye. Namely on the accessories tab, there's a link to a LAMY | Series stylus [2]. For those who haven't heard of LAMY, they're a | pretty big name in the fountain pen world. The page is pretty | light on the details, but AFAIK this is the first ever | collaboration between fountain pen giant & writing tablet. It | even has their iconic pocket clip design... Definitely piqued my | interest. | | Although interestingly, the tip of the Supernote pen that comes | with the A5/A6 series looks more like something that would | produce more of a pen-to-paper feeling with its 0.7mm tip. | | [1] https://www.supernote.com/ [2] | https://www.supernote.com/#/part?id=SP-05 | beefman wrote: | I have a Remarkable2. The hardware is fantastic but the software | is so unbelievably bad I want to throw it in a river every time I | pick it up. | | I also have the original Remarkable, an iPad Pro with Apple | Pencil, a Boogie Board (2011), an iRex iLiad (2007), and I used | Windows 3.1 for Pen Computing back in the '90s. | | The use case I've long wanted to digitize -- quickly working out | problems -- is one I still do on paper. The Remarkable2 hardware | is finally there, but the software makes it useless to me. | mastazi wrote: | In music production, during the 80's and 90's there was a gradual | switch from hardware studio equipment to DAW software, as | computers became more powerful. | | But in recent years, many musicians decided come back to stand- | alone hardware devices, there is even a term for this: it's a | "dawless" setup. | | The most commonly mentioned reason for this is "I want a | distraction free environment", or something along the lines of "I | don't want to create music on the same device where I receive | social media notifications". | | To me, devices like reMarkable are basically responding to the | same need, but in a different field (note taking as opposed to | music production). | | I wonder if this could become a more general trend, where people | at least partially move away from general purpose devices. | noobly wrote: | Opportunities to ask about these devices don't come up very | often, so please help me decide what I want here: | | I want something that allows me to do math problems while laying | down horizontally, mostly before bed. With a book and paper, it's | a mess trying to do this, and I require e-ink. So I need good | support for reading PDFs _and_ writing on screen, which is a | niche apparently. I need split screen functionality or something | like it, so I can have half my screen be scratch paper, and in | the other half I can flip through the text (and I need a | reasonably sized screen to accommodate all this). If I cannot do | this, the device is not usable enough to purchase imo. I have no | desire to take notes, draw or convert my writing to text. It | would be a big plus if it could also read epubs as then I | wouldn't need my current ereader. | | I'm leaning toward the Remarkable 2, mostly due to it shaping up | to be 'hacker friendly' (so I can lean on the community to write | some features) and the writing supposedly feeling real, but I | don't like how expensive the little pencil nubs are and having to | replace them is kind of a drag. I tend to binge research my | options a couple times per year but haven't pulled the trigger | yet. I get frustrated because I feel like I want something so | basic that it should already exist - just a book and scratch | paper in one device, with a screen that doesn't keep me awake at | night or distract me with a web browser. Anyway, last I checked | the Remarkable 2 didn't quite have a splitscreen feature or | anything close enough, so I opted to wait. | | Would appreciate any input, I'm probably going to break down and | buy one this month. | h3ctic wrote: | The remarkable is not able to do split screen (for now). | Instead, you can install the [ddvk | hacks](https://github.com/ddvk/remarkable-hacks) for fast | switching between recent documents and a swipe to the previous | document. | | I'd recommend the remarkable2 as the hacker friendliness makes | quite a difference | noobly wrote: | >fast switching between recent documents | | This is what my research told me last I looked too, thanks | for the confirmation that this is still true. I believe RM | will deliver long term, hacker friendliness goes a long way. | Not sure if it's worth the price atm, but I'll look out for a | cheap used one. I could do so much more critical reading if I | could do it while lying down. | maxrev17 wrote: | I love my rm2 as a mental scratchpad, list maker, PDF reader, | ebook reader etc. Etc. I have a trick, I bought the Lamy pen | compatible with the rm2, and pushed the rm2 pen nib up it, | makes for an awesome writing experience!!!! | noobly wrote: | I am reading the rm2 doesn't reflow pdfs? Has this been a | problem for you? | maxrev17 wrote: | I suppose coming from a Kindle, the screen space increase | for me means I'm not that bothered. For me pdfs are | formatted intentionally - so maybe take my words with a | pinch of salt! | maxrev17 wrote: | Link: https://www.lamy.com/en/emr/?languageRedirect=1&cHash=3 | 7ce4a... | dzogchen wrote: | Can recommend a Onyx Boox Max Lumi. It has a 13 inch screen and | good split screen notes functionality. | | https://imgur.com/a/2CPy5O9 | noobly wrote: | That looks great, 13 inch screen ensures no reflow issues | too. Are you able to flip through the pages with minimal | issues while in split screen mode, or do you have to manually | resize the page each time? Also, it looks like you have this | in 'landscape' mode - is that correct? Awesome feature if so. | Too bad these are still so niche and therefore pricey, $800 | is a painful price point for such a device imo. | Tho85 wrote: | I bought the Onyx Boox Note Air some months ago, and I must say | that I'm really happy with it. Screen refresh is good, there's | almost no ghosting in default mode, and refresh rates are | acceptable. | | There are only two downsides about it: The vendor does not | respect FOSS and does not publish the sources for their modified | Linux kernel, and the device constantly phones home to China. | However, the device can be rooted easily [1], and you can install | a firewall to stop the preloaded apps from phoning home (verified | it with Wireshark). | | [1]: https://blog.tho.ms/hacks/2021/03/27/hacking-onyx-boox- | note-... | andrei_says_ wrote: | Any chance to block this via my router for example? | | Is there an IP list anywhere? | | And, do you know what data they send? | dominotw wrote: | I bought this last year during pandemic. My reading time has | grown exponentially, i couldn't update sure . I like that i can | use play store apps so i use kindle, libby, pocket and oreilly. | hcurtiss wrote: | Man, I don't know. I have the Onyx Poke 3 and I find the | software pretty janky. For instance, in order to install a | dictionary, I have to jump through a whole series of hoops to | download one to a PC and then upload/install it on the tablet. | I could install the Kindle app (after I enable the Google Play | Store), but then I might as well buy a Kindle. In order to | upload epub or pdf documents to the Poke3, I have to interface | through a browser on a page with a very limited interface. They | do not have upload by email, bluetooth, or any other convenient | interface with my phone. All in all, it's just felt like a | half-baked product to me. | Tho85 wrote: | I use Syncthing [1] to do all the syncing, works like a | charm. I have a folder synchronized between my reader, my PC | and my phone, and whenever I need to send a document to the | reader or from the reader to my PC, I just put it into that | folder. | | [1] https://syncthing.net/ | rchaud wrote: | I discovered Syncthing last week, and it's exactly what I | was looking for: a local server that syncs between Device A | and Device B on the same network. No need for a middleman | like Dropbox. | | This is why I'm leaning towards the Note Air. The Kobo | Elipsa is coming out soon but it syncs with Dropbox only. | westpfelia wrote: | Syncthing is maybe my favorite software discovery this | year. It does exactly what I want it to no fuss. I'll shill | for Syncthing all day. | salamandersauce wrote: | You can install a dictionary on the device, they are just | stardict dictionary files...it's literally putting a file in | a folder. They also have some available to download although | mainly focused on Chinese/Russian. | | It runs Android. You can just sync things through the cloud | provider of your choice. Put the Dropbox, OneDrive, NextCloud | etc. app on and just download it from there. | | Most eReaders don't have upload by email just Kindles and | that doesn't let you send a more recent better formats like | KFX or AZW3, just ancient mobi. Ditto Bluetooth. | | And guess what? At least with Android phones "Nearby Share" | works too (although that may require setting up Google Play | Store. | powerapple wrote: | I thinks he is looking for a "kindle" and really should get | a Kindle. I actually own a Kindle and a BOOX Nova 3, they | are two different products, not interchangeable if you are | picky about which is better at doing what. I would have a | E-ink tablet, a Kindle and a iPad depending on the tasks. | andrei_says_ wrote: | Anything you've installed on the nova3 that you use? | | Apart from Kindle, Firefox and safari books online | reader? | | I've found that 3rd party drawing apps don't work well | with the screen. | salamandersauce wrote: | Yeah maybe. I use my Nova 2 as an everything eReader. Run | the Kindle app for Kindle books, Kobo for kobo stuff, | etc. Plus it will do things like Marvel Unlimited, | Tachiyomi that readers from Amazon and Kobo won't. | hcurtiss wrote: | I want a Kindle for DRM free epubs | tluyben2 wrote: | I don't use most of their stuff on it; anything Android works | and that's what I use. However I do like their reader. Never | tried a dictionary installation but the rest is all | resolvable with Android apps I would think; for synching | anything you would use on an android phone works here too; | dropbox, google drive etc. | | The fact it runs Android is vastly better than some custom | software (like Kindle and others) because of this reason. | vinni2 wrote: | I don't like the software on my Onyx boox. It's over engineered | with too many options often not intuitive. Unless you opt in | for their cloud service syncing sucks. I still can't figure out | how to access documents from Dropbox and edit them and sync it | back. | dominotw wrote: | I use google drive from the play store. There is an extra | step to enable play store. | zmk_ wrote: | Try Dropsync [1], you can sync particular folders to your | Drobpox. The sync is bidirectional. There is a similar app | for Google Drive as well. | | [1] https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ttxapps | .dr... | stewbrew wrote: | Is there any information on what data it sends home? Is the | problem the server is in China? My Android phone always phones | home to some US servers. | | P.S. I own a rm2 but I'd be interested in an e-ink android | tablet. | Tho85 wrote: | It's been a while since I looked at it, but here's what I | remember: | | In the UI, you can choose if the device should communicate to | Chinese or US servers. Both of them are available under the | boox.com domain, so I assume they are both controlled by the | Chinese manufacturer. The device uses this to check for | firmware upgrades, to sync notes, for their own book store | and IIRC to send some basic usage statistics. As per firmware | version 3.0 (v3.1 is current), this traffic was only partly | encrypted. | | Besides this, the software seems to include some kind of | Tencent SDK, which tries to contact Chinese servers quite | aggressively, regardless of which setting you choose in the | UI. The traffic is encrypted, so I couldn't figure out what | it does. The servers seem to belong to Tencent's QQ service | [1], so they supposedly use it for their on-device support | feature. However, because the device tries to contact the | servers immediately after startup, I assume it does some kind | of analytics tracking as well. Blocking the service's domains | on the DNS level doesn't work though, as the SDK will start | to contact fixed IP addresses if DNS resolution fails. | | Luckily, all of this traffic can be blocked after rooting and | installing a firewall (see my post above), since all of this | is implemented under Android user ID 1000, which makes it | easy to block in AFWall+. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tencent_QQ | nzmsv wrote: | It doesn't just phone home to China. The company actually | refuses to comply with the GPL because of "anti-China | sentiment" and closed down their support forum when people got | angry (https://www.reddit.com/r/RemarkableTablet/comments/hsyig | m/on...) | echelon wrote: | > The company actually refuses to comply with the GPL because | of "anti-China sentiment" | | Seems like just cause for a multinational import ban. This is | flagrant law breaking and theft. | dspillett wrote: | _> because of "anti-China sentiment"_ | | Because yet another Chinese company flagrantly flouting a | licence is _really_ going to help with that situation... | | I was considering one of their devices. I am now not. | bjornjajayaja wrote: | If it phones home to China count me out. I'll go for the | reMarkable tyvm | | I can just see me working on a brilliant invention (one can | dream , right?) and putting my notes into the note boox, only | to realize it gets patented before me by a Chinese company. | est wrote: | > If it phones home to China count me out. | | About 1 billion Chinese customers think the same like you, | except they refuse products that phone home to USA. | bserge wrote: | As they are free to do. | johnmaguire wrote: | Makes sense? After all, you're crossing legal | jurisdictions. | PaulRobinson wrote: | US (and EU, and indeed everywhere else), companies do not | have as long and detailed a recent track record of IP | theft. | msie wrote: | Don't forget that Facebook and Google steal all sorts of | information about you too. | est wrote: | And that's relevant with customer choice because? | selectodude wrote: | Because people create IP on their tablets. | eloisant wrote: | Because you might be taking work-related notes on your | device that you don't want to be stolen as industrial | spying. | yitchelle wrote: | I know that this is obvious, but worth noting. | | This anxiety is not just China as a destination, but it just | as relevant if it phones home to any company in any | _country_. | tomComb wrote: | I don't agree. Remarkable is based in Norway and I have | more confidence in a Norwegian companies handling of my | data. | Aeolun wrote: | Maybe not _just_ as relevant, but certainly still annoying. | asdwerwasdf wrote: | please get over yourself | tluyben2 wrote: | I am happy with the Boox; it's a great device (hardware + the | reader too) I think and I use it every day. Besides the China | nature (which means what user Tho85 already explained here), I am | a huge fan of the idea more different eReader types. For a lot of | tasks. I often work in bright sunlight and it works really well | while my laptops, including the MacBook m1 will give me a | headache in 15 minutes glaring against the sun; this is just | perfect and powerful enough to be a big screen for another | device. | | Because of this device I now have the weird hallucination of my | perfect device; seems it would be a surface pro x lte (but later | gen; it needs to at last get closer to usable software wise) but | with a color eInk screen. I know they will never make this but | yep, that would be basically my daily driver. The Boox people | could come quite far but they focus on eReaders. | fnord77 wrote: | the price on the reMarkable is a tough sell. I think I'd pay $150 | for something like this (and still feel like I was kinda blowing | money) | varispeed wrote: | I have reMarkable 2 and I think it is brilliant, however it has | one deal breaker that is there is no encryption on the device. If | you lose it, you risk your documents landing in a bad actor | hands. One may say it's the same with actual paper - sure, but | reMarkable 2 can store much more data than a suitcase of | documents. | | Then I have no idea whether documents on their cloud are | encrypted and who has access to it beside myself. | | So reMarkable has become an expensive paperweight. | | I saw some people tried to get encrypted fs working, don't how | well that works though. | | I wrote an email to support about this and I never got any reply. | Says all... | CandyFace wrote: | The latest update includes the ability to open password | protected PDF's https://blog.remarkable.com/software- | update-2-7-small-steps-... | | Might be worth taking a look again | ACS_Solver wrote: | Their cloud is fully optional - you don't have to use the rM | cloud, or even create an account. To me that is itself one of | the killer features of the rM, it works as an offline device | with local storage. | gspr wrote: | I'm a very happy ReMarkable 2 owner. I only wish it had been | available many years ago: maaaan this thing would have saved me | lugging around (and losing!) a gazillion duplicates of papers | with different sets of notes on them during my PhD. I'm an | incredibly disorganized person, and the RM2 has been an absolute | godsend for me. | | Positives: | | * Build quality feels great. | | * Screen is super responsive when writing. And responsive | _enough_ when flipping pages (although I am not familiar with the | state of the art ebook readers). | | * Pen feels really good against the surface. After one day of | getting used to it, it started feeling as natural as paper for | me. | | * Hacker friendly: Tick a box under "settings" and it gives you | the root password, and you just plug in a USB cable and SSH in as | you please. Inside is a pretty standard Busybox-based Linux. All | the cloud gizmos are optional. See also | https://github.com/reHackable/awesome-reMarkable | | * Eternal battery life and perfect viewing angles and everything | else you'd expect from this kind of screen. | | Negatives: | | * I would have like the screen to be just a liiiittle bit bigger. | Some papers on A4 paper with smaller fonts cause me to squint a | little unless I zoom in to crop out the margins (and if the | margins aren't the same on each page, that's annoying). | | * The upselling price of the nice carrying cases and the "fancy" | pen are a bit ridiculous. Thankfully, the fancy pen isn't really | that useful to me, because I prefer the fill-erase mode anyway. | | * I often accidentally hit the power on button when carrying the | thing. | | * I know they're trying to minimize physical buttons, but I would | personally have loved a physical button (preferably on the pen!) | to flip into (fill-)erase mode. | lovelyviking wrote: | I have rM1 and tried many things with it even wrote some software | to run there. Yet the usage is rather limited so far. | | This page contains a list of free software for rM on github: | | https://github.com/reHackable/awesome-reMarkable | | And this amazing guy even made a full alternative GNU/Linux OS | running on rM: | | http://www.davisr.me/projects/parabola-rm/ | | Still I have some unresolved issues. When I say 'unresolved | issues' I mean I tried a few things but didn't found something | comfortable 'enough' to use. I need something that 'just works' | without me dealing with it constantly. | | * How would you sync notes between rM and Mac quickly? | | Of course syncing through their online service/apps is out of the | question due to the privacy. | | * How would you sync quickly books with it? I | know you can connect it directly to a computer and use Web | Interface. It's too slow and not always works. I perhaps works | for one or two books but not very practicle for everyday use. | Besides my new Mac doesn't come with normal usb port (thanks | apple) and dealing with adapter is too much of a headake each | time. | | * How would you read HackerNews on rM1 comfortably? | | * How would you use it as second monitor for Mac to read some web | articles and work? | | I know there is: https://github.com/matteodelabre/vnsee I've | managed to configure it as second screen for linux virtual | machine running on Mac but this is not the same as running it as | second screen to the Mac itself. | | Also since my last model of macbook pro (2016) had successfully | died lately due to the quality of this garbage I had to buy a M1 | model. The virutal machine configured for this purpose was based | on Virtual Box which is if I understand correctly doesn't work | very well on M1 and so far there are no plans to make it work | there. So I am still looking for good alternative option to make | it run at least this way. If you have some advice I would be | happy to hear. | | * What is the 'safest' or 'correct' way to backup the whole rM | and be sure that you can restore it without a danger to brick it | completely. | | * How to connect BT Keyboard and configure it properly. | | * All these 'issues' basically about how to make it usable for | programming. | | If you have any good solutions/ideas about those issues please | share. | colordrops wrote: | There is some 3rd party software for remarkable, but mostly to | enhance the standard operation of the tablet, i.e. reading, | drawing and writing. I really wish a better open source launcher | and more apps were written. I would prefer to check a checkbox | and sync my todos off the tablet rather than write them out then | erase or cross them out them when done. Or use an app for habit | tracking, etc. There's a big underserved market here. I am going | to give a go at building something if I can find the time. | modzu wrote: | adding a different perspective here: we're still comparing 2 | technologies that, to me, are not yet mature enough for the | mainstream. i have both but still use my pen and notebook. why? | firstly, its not quite a joy. they are slow (janky, glitchy | refreshes, latency, etc, depending on your specific device..) for | example changing a page is still jarring. in some lighting the | screens dont look good (grey, low contrast). and sometimes i | reach for the boox, and woops, dead battery. what i thought i | would benefit from the most was having a "single notepad to rule | them all" (i have multiple notebooks for various purposes and | thought it would be cool to just have one device, with the | multiple notebooks inside, and searchable!) well, in some ways | its more convenient, but in others its clearly lacking polish. | its a pain to move a page from one book to another for instance, | or to open up the section i want, so i end up with notes mixed up | sometimes anyway. i cant be as precise as with a real pen, so a | single page in my real book is about 2 on the tablet. etc. | anyway, there werent many dissenting voices here so i thought id | share a dose of reality for anyone with an itch. im very excited | to see what comes in the next generation of both, maybe then ill | finally be able to recommend them | imroot wrote: | My biggest complaint about the ReMarkable is the lack of any | meaningful business management tools -- I love using it, but, I | need to be able to limit sharing, specify a specific SMTP service | to use for sharing pdf files, remotely wipe a device, enforce a | password on the device before storing and sharing notes from a | sensitive meeting amongst my team. | | Outside of that edge case, I love it and it's indispensable and I | use it at least 3 times a day for meetings and other to-do lists | for myself. | zachruss92 wrote: | I pre-ordered the Remarkable 1 and ended up returning it due to | buggy software and the battery life not performing as advertised | (had to recharge literally every day). I pre-ordered the | Remarkable 2 when it came out because it was much more | affordable. | | I've had it since November and have used it virtually every day. | It's light and portable and I think I've charged it three times | since November. They've definitely improved their software a lot | and I love the OSS community around it. | | The only feature I wish it had was full text search on my notes. | But I and willing toive without it as I want a lower tech | solution for note taking that is still portable. | michaelmior wrote: | Interesting. That hasn't been my experience at all with the | reMarkable 1. I do agree the software needed some work, but it | has improved significantly since I first bought it. I have been | debating purchasing the reMarkable 2 and although it looks | great, I think I'm happy enough with the first device to keep | it for now. | markroseman wrote: | Has anything improved recently for RM2 around secure sync to a | LAN? Would like to experiment with one for my psychiatrist wife | to replace her paper chart notes, but anything hitting an | external cloud service is out of the question for patient | information. Sync via cable would be too obtrusive. And I gather | handwriting recognition etc. is done via cloud. | gpm wrote: | There's no official solution, but, | | It's just linux. It has ssh installed (it tells you the | password in the "copyright and licenses" menu, and you can | private keys on the device like normal). It connects to wifi. | You can write a script that runs on the device and periodically | syncs notes somewhere (I have this setup with restic for | backups). | | Handwriting recognition is done by cloud, and, I mean, unless | you want to set up your own software for handwriting | recognition (doesn't sound easy) you would need to give up that | feature (I have)... | pomatic wrote: | DIY handwriting recognition is actually really easy using | Microsofts SaaS offerings. The results are _astonishingly_ | good too - it makes mincemeat of my awful handwriting. | gpm wrote: | That's really interesting actually, thanks for letting me | know! | | Not sure trading out remarkables cloud for microsoft's | cloud is exactly what OP wants though ;) | [deleted] | wuschel wrote: | Is there any solid PDF/epub reader that has a display size of A4 | (8.3 inch x 11.7 inch) and OK scribbling capabilities? | chrisweekly wrote: | I'm really glad I bought my ReMarkable2 (and Marker "Plus"), as | it suits my use case extremely well: replacing stacks of 8.5x11" | graph notepads, while adding digitization / sync, undo/redo, | select/cut/paste/resize/move, (modest) pan/zoom, etc. Battery | life and form factor are great. The writing UX is really | something: low-latency, ~perfect hand detection, and the "feel" | of writing. Yeah, the software's mediocre, but it's gotten | noticeably better since I bought it ~6mo ago. And it's still | early days. The OSS community did wonders for the RM1, and I | expect RM2 to follow suit. It's not a do-anything kind of device | (I absolutely love my Kindle Oasis for reading) but for me it was | easily worth the $. | zaphar wrote: | I have a remarkable 2 as well and It's a fantastic notetaker | and pdf annotation device. One benefit I didn't think about | beforehand but use somewhat frequently is signing documents | while working from home. Just print to pdf, copy to remarkable, | sign, email back to sender. Way easier than printing, signing, | scanning, and then emailing back. | darkwater wrote: | In those cases I usually take the PDF, open it with | LibreOffice and paste over my signature, scanned once upon a | time. Never got any complaints, but it could be easily | discovered for sure. | vinni2 wrote: | I bought Remarkable 2 and returned it sadly. It does one thing | very well which is writing. But not a great tool for reading | PDFs. When I figured pinch to zoom was not possible that was it | for me. It's a really polished tool for wiring but they have a | lot of room to improve for reading experience. | nosianu wrote: | As others have said, pinch to zoom works now. | | Although that only helps to zoom in to one spot, if I were to | try using that to read a page where the font is too small, | having to shift the page left and right while zoomed, it | would be a nightmare to read a document. | | My gripe is I cannot switch the device to show a PDF in | landscape mode. Then at least pretty much all documents' | fonts would be large enough, if I use the height of the | device for the width of the PDF. Then I would only have to | scroll down and only after reading half a page. That would | work well, scrolling left-right-left-right-.... while zoomed | in does not, unless the page has two columns of text so that | I don't have to scroll right-left-.... | | I use my RM2 mostly as epub reader. For the price - I got the | preorder discount - it was the same or even lower as other | pure readers of a similar size. | | The software does have some weaknesses, for example sometimes | I have to edit the epubs and remove some CSS background color | because it ends up black on dark gray (unreadable of course), | or it has set defaults for font, line height and such | settings and I cannot set new defaults so I end up setting | those for each and every document I sync to it anew. Still, | it's acceptable for me, it's just a few (now muscle memory) | clicks. To sync I sometimes have to start the Windows app to | which I added a document a second time before it uploads it | to the cloud server. That too now is a muscle-memory action. | I hope they fix it some day but it's not a deal breaker. | | I did a bit of writing and that just works and feels very | good too. Other than the base use cases the software is very | barebone. As others have pointed out, that's a goal. The | device does everything I expect from it, which is just some | basic writing and the epub reading. I can send webpages to | the device (while it's online) by clicking an extension icon | in the browser, which I do for RoyalRoad chapters, for | example. WebToEpub creates epub files for entire Webnovels, | which have to be uploaded using the Windows app though. | vinni2 wrote: | For me main use case is reading research articles annotate | on it and sync it with my desktop and share it with my | colleagues. Ideally I wanted a bibliography library tool | like mendeley or zotero and keep all my annotations and | notes synced. But that is far from possible on any e-ink | tablet so far I have tried. | Terretta wrote: | I'd pay real money for something like LiquidText | rethought for e-Ink. | jessmartin wrote: | That's interesting, because I read PDFs (and annotate) every | single day. Pinch-to-zoom works great, and it's the best PDF | reader I've experienced. Can't recommend highly enough. | gspr wrote: | Pinch zoom is available in PDFs now. I'm on 2.7, but I | believe it was added in 2.6. It works really well. Of course | it's far slower than on a normal tablet due to the e-ink | screen, but it's definitely fine for me. | vinni2 wrote: | Ok I gave up too early then. Ah well I didn't have | patience. | szszrk wrote: | I think it's actually impressive speed-wise. Not a real | tablet speed but in my case even large, graphics heavy | documents work quite well. | | I'm surprised they pulled this one off. | gspr wrote: | Absolutely. I just added the comment because I've had | some friends who are unfamiliar with e-ink screens | expecting tablet behavior. | | I just refereed a research paper with complex (color!) | graphics on the thing. It was an absolute breeze! | szszrk wrote: | Yeah, I'm on some facebook reMarkable groups and it's | stunning how many people bought it without watching a | single video from manufacturer. They though browser, | video, dropbox/google drive/others will be available, or | that it will integrate with their decade worth of notes | from various services... | | Those tablet e-ink devices does some of that. reMarkable | is just a notepad with very simple cloud sync to their | cloud. | infinitezest wrote: | That's disappointing to hear. I've been on the fence about | way to pick one of these up but I had heard that the reading | experience was sub par. I have yet to find an e-ink tablet | that's attractive enough to spend money on. | auggierose wrote: | I bought it as well and returned it. It is just too small for | reading PDFs comfortably. | sork_hn wrote: | Me too! | szszrk wrote: | I'm using ReMarkable 2 as well and am happy with it, but if I | would just wait for other devices to come up I'd consider boox | nova or something like that for their completely different (and | better) text convertion and so on. | | But still - the device is quite awesome and I tough myself some | drawing. Use it all the time to prototype diagrams and show | architecture. Love it that I can draw some weird system | connections on a diagram, copy and paste, and change some | parts. Then I send a PDF and use it as a flip-book on zoom cals | :) | | Opensource tweaks are pretty good now. Some are actually | obsolete as ReMarkable did nice improvements to zoom and | document links. But most tweaks support RM2 already. | jessmartin wrote: | Same here. I had literally dozens of moleskines that I've been | writing in for nearly 15 years. I'm a huge fan of paper, but | was looking for a solution that allowed me to digitize my note- | taking without giving up the ergonomics of paper. | | As you point out, the "writing UX" was so astonishing, it was | probably the quickest "adoption" of any major tech upgrade for | me. | | I wrote some notes on my experience and the transition from | paper here: https://jessmart.in/articles/remarkable | katabasis wrote: | This is my experience too. I used to keep a stack of notebooks | around, and I never seemed to have the right one on hand. Now I | just have to keep track of one notebook that will never run out | of space. With the most recent updates the e-reading experience | has also gotten much better. | | At this point the only feature I'd say is lacking is some kind | of e-book store integration. I'd like to be able to purchase | books from mainstream publishers to read on the device (it's | sad how few publishers distribute books in non-DRM, plain ePub | files these days). | Grumbledour wrote: | I always think of the remarkable as a really odd device. Hardware | wise, it looks great, but I seldom hear good things about the | software, only that it is "improving" for years now. | | Also, while I think the form factor would be great for a text and | graphics based computing device, they seem to invest as much | energy as possible in playing down the computing angle, so that | instead of having something great to do technical sketching, | email or even interactive notebooks like Jupiter on, you get a | really over engineered piece of paper. | | Now, it's pretty open, which is great, but I am not that | convinced it will necessary remain so, and at that price, buying | it only in the hopes of some people making better software in | their free time always seems like a bigger gamble I like to take. | I accept that for me ~120EUR ereader, but for 5 times the price? | | I really wish they would embrace mobile computing. Combining an | e-ink tablet optimized for text with a moldable operating system | like on the old xerox machines could be so incredibly good. | | By the way, does the hardware allow connecting an external | keyboard? | tluyben2 wrote: | Yeah so you want the Boox with Play Store installed. Then you | have all that stuff. | Grumbledour wrote: | Well, in theory. One could write an app for that I guess. But | the whole complex android stack does not really appeal to me. | Simplicity I think, would also be really important. And I | think openness goes hand in hand with that. | tluyben2 wrote: | Boox is easy to root and the remarkable is open. Not sure | how well the remarkable would work with a keyboard, but my | Boox included a keyboard (it's just a BLE one but it has | good support). On the remarkable at least you should be | able to run some tiny linux distro with a simple as you | want stack. Guess in time we will get something; just not | sure how to make sure it's more open. | whywhywhywhy wrote: | > I accept that for me ~120EUR ereader | | There is no point chasing hardware customers who would only pay | $120 for a device like this. You're never going to be able to | make a sustainable business at that prices and those people are | always going to be comparing your product to Amazon Kindle | prices yet also demanding way beyond that. | | Better to find an audience that is passionate about what you're | building and passionate for a new alternative and willing to | spend the money that can keep your business sustainable. I | understand you'd be more interested if it was Jupiter notebooks | tablet but eInk but that's an even more niche product than note | taking and would therefore cost way more than the current | price. | jonahbenton wrote: | I'm a fan of the remarkable, use v2 every day. My high school | daughter uses my old v1 every day. We both love it. | | But it is absolutely very opinionated- entirely oriented around | hand-writing use cases, specifically those that involve being | away from power and network. So its power budget is low and it | has amazingly robust synchronization. | | You can read and do some other things on it, but that's not | what it solves for. | lovelyviking wrote: | >By the way, does the hardware allow connecting an external | keyboard? | | I know for sure that RM1 hardware does allow you to connect | external keyboard becase I have done it. | | I can't tell about RM2 as I do not have it. | spinningslate wrote: | >I seldom hear good things about the software, only that it is | "improving" for years now. | | I think that depends on what you want out of the device. It's | definitely limited - but, as other posters note, that's an | explicit design choice. A design _goal_ in fact. But what it | does, it does pretty well. I 've had my RM2 for maybe a year | now. And I use it daily. It's become my preferred note-taking & | sketching medium, replacing the paper notepads I've used for | years. | | I don't use it for anything else: but it supports those two use | cases very nicely. It's simple but subtle things that I've | found useful, for example: | | 1. Keeping my notes in folders. 2. Being able to add notes to a | subject (folder), rather than interleaving in a paper book 3. | Being able to move things about when sketching. I'd often get | to the edge of the paper in a notebook and need to cram | something awkwardly. Now, I can just select and move. | | I've tried using a wacom tablet connected to the PC instead, | and much prefer the remarkable. The ergonomics just feel so | much better. | | It's not perfect: live sync can be a bit unreliable, and I'd | prefer the "todo" template to be a bit more app-like (move | items off the list when complete). | | But I can live with those. I like the fact it's focused, | efficient, pleasant to use, and doesn't try to be all things to | all people. | 83457 wrote: | What I can say is it just works. If you keep a notebook, it is | a viable alternative with few drawbacks and many advantages in | my experience. | | They have been very careful and deliberate with their features. | At first it was odd or even frustrating that the capabilities | are limited, but over time I have started to understand their | approach and wanting to align with their goal of being a | focused and distraction free experience. | | It seems like they have little real competition in this niche | they have carved out, so can take the time to slowly but | continuously role out enhancements. It reminds me of how the | iPhone has been limited in overall capabilities compared to | Android but stays more streamlined as enhancements are made. | salamandersauce wrote: | Boox Note Air does through Bluetooth or USB C. It just runs | Android so you can pretty much do whatever. It's literally an | Android Tablet with an eInk screen. | | Remarkable you can hack in keyboard support. They are just | focused on making a good digital notepad. Even their reading | software is sub-par. | throwuxiytayq wrote: | Remarkable is really a device for people who explicitly _don 't | want_ those features. They're betting hard that the market | exists, although it probably isn't as large as the market for | an as-powerful-as-possible general-purpose computing device. | | I've seen it mentioned that someone got an USB keyboard | working, and the device is pretty hackable overall (you can SSH | to root over wifi out of the box!), but I think if you want to | connect an external keyboard then it probably isn't for you | anyway. You can't even type text in documents. | | Disclaimer: reMarkable 2 user, pretty happy with their focus, | but I wish the device was more responsive in some scenarios | (complicated drawings are very slow) and there's certainly many | missing core drawing/writing/reading features. | Grumbledour wrote: | Let me just add that I am not talking about a powerful all | purpose computing device, because I think we pretty much have | this with modern tablets/laptops. | | But I do feel the computing part could be much more utilized | to make taking notes and reading text better. I am thinking | of Hypertext, drawing tools like sketchpad, simple | programming tools etc. | | Not a device that does as much as possible badly, but one | that could really push forward computing and text to get | something more akin to digital paper we have seen for years | in science fiction. | | I don't begrudge people who like the extremely limited use | case it has today, I personally just don't really get it why | I should spend hundreds of dollars on something that I can | pretty much get with a notebook and my smartphone camera. | | On the other hand, this is a general problem these days that | hampers innovation. As hard as hardware seems to be, it is | obviously much easier than software, which is why so many | devices these days fall short. | fouric wrote: | > But I do feel the computing part could be much more | utilized to make taking notes and reading text better. I am | thinking of Hypertext, drawing tools like sketchpad, simple | programming tools etc. | | The problem is that even those "simple" things are a | _massive_ amount of work to get right (where "right" means | bug-free, performant, well-documented (or intuitive - pick | at least one), flexible, and with an ergonomic interface). | Additionally, they're significantly more work than the even | simpler restricted feature-set that the reMarkable | currently offers. | | I believe that the reMarkable developers are shooting for | "quality over quantity" - polishing a small feature-set to | a blinding shine, rather than trying to implement a larger | feature-set poorly - that is, an _intentional trade-off_. I | 'm happy with that trade-off, but I know that others might | not be - in which case, you'll probably get the Android | device that other people in the thread are discussing. | | Also, the reMarkable is open - you can add all these things | yourself, if you're sufficiently motivated. | | > something that I can pretty much get with a notebook | | The reMarkable's features, as limited as they are, are | still _miles_ beyond what a notebook gives you. You have | backup, synchronization, document export (PDF, raster, | SVG), undo /redo, multiple documents, digital storage, | cut/copy/paste, erasing (pen can't be erased, pencil | usually leaves marks and has other problems), multiple | brushes, page reordering, multiple page templates (lined, | grid, music, blank canvas, and more), layers, really good | handwriting recognition, and more. | | Yes, it's light-years behind what we could have - but we're | stuck in the place we're at because of a number of | computing decisions that we made in the past (and continue | to make now) that hamper creativity and flexibility, and | overcoming those choices requires a lot of resources and | the ability to ignore/bypass/counteract a _massive_ amount | of market inertia. The reMarkable team simply doesn 't have | those resources, so they have to make a trade-off - and the | trade-off they made was quality over quantity (of | features). | atatatat wrote: | > you can SSH to root over wifi out of the box! | | Yeah. Let me rush to put that on my main network. | ryanianian wrote: | You have to explicitly turn on SSH access, and each device | has its own unique SSH password which is only accessible | from the device itself. It's not a set of generic | admin/admin creds. | darkwater wrote: | Do you have SSH-exploiting self-replicating worms running | on your main network? | asdf123wtf wrote: | One would hope not, but it makes connecting to less | trusted networks much more risky than it needs to be. And | I'm sure that's something users will regularly do. | | Software updates are infrequent and they certainly aren't | pushing out standalone security errata that I've seen. | asdf123wtf wrote: | Wow, I didn't realize it exposes root ssh over it's wifi | interface. I just tested it and it works. I don't like that | at all. | | The documentation makes it sound like it only exposes ssh | through it's ethernet over USB interface. | marvindanig wrote: | > Hardware wise, it looks great, but I seldom hear good things | about the software, only that it is "improving" for years now. | | It was pretty much DOA for me. Over the years I have | learned/trained my hand to keep away from pen and paper. Well, | mostly. Asking the same limb to now go back into taking notes | by hand or drawing free-hand is a no-go for me. I learned this | the hard way. And yes, laggy software makes it worse. | karpour wrote: | I have a reMarkable 2 for a while now, and I'm super happy with | it. I specifically didn't want an Android device because of the | obsolescence. The reMarkable doesn't run much in the background | and does its job well. | | I bought it to read my IT books, works perfectly. I'm also an | artist, and even though I didn't expect much from the pen, | sketching on it is very fun and I find myself filling a page of | sketches almost every day. | | Having full access to the underlying OS is also a big plus, | even though I didn't do anything with that yet. | ocdtrekkie wrote: | I can tell you my wife absolutely loves her Remarkable 2. I | kinda want one myself now, but am not sure I can justify the | cost for myself because my technology usage is different. | | In her case, the ereader functionality is secondary. She's big | on writing in notebooks and the Remarkable's experience there | justifies the cost. It's really a device for writing, not | reading. | varispeed wrote: | Lack of computer features is refreshing to be honest. You can't | be distracted just like sitting in front of blank page of | paper. | | That being said, a deal breaker for me is lack of encryption. | bipson wrote: | E-Mail and Python notebooks? I don't think they these are the | primary use cases for a "digital paper" device. | | What you consider an "overengineered piece" of paper might be | intentional. Maybe you don't need paper - some people do. | Grumbledour wrote: | But should a more modern, digital paper, not enhance the | human intellect? Why should I not be able to jot down a math | formula that the computer then solves for me? Why cant I draw | a triangle and let it compute the sides? Why not write a | letter to a friend and send it directly to them and also read | their answer on the same device? | | This would be enhancing paper for me. Combining the at this | point pretty natural way of writing on paper with many of the | modern computers amenities. Sure, you might not need all | these, but paper is also cents if you really need "Not | features". Minimalism and focus on core features is fine, but | artificially limitations in this way does not seem to help | remarkable to deliver good software. So what does it achieve? | criddell wrote: | > So what does it achieve? | | Sustainability. The device isn't for everybody. The | constraints are features. | | Sounds like you want something more like an iPad. | dTal wrote: | Except e-ink, and ultra-low-latency pen input, and ssh- | able... | | I think the "interactive paper" vision is very different | from the "ipad" vision. | criddell wrote: | The RM2 pen latency (20 ms) is double the iPad's (9 ms). | | I wouldn't call the RM2 interactive paper. It's digital | paper. Remarkable has focused their device to that niche | and I think that was very smart of them. It's all about | e-ink, crazy battery life, no distractions. I know a lot | of people want more functionality - especially in the | reader area, drawing apps, and calendar functions. So far | Remarkable has managed to stay focused on the core | functionality and I think the longer they can remain | focused, the better off the company is. Every feature | they add is something they have to test and maintain | forever and that's a lot for a small company to do and | still sell the device for about $400 (which is a bargain | IMHO). | | What I'd like to see is a bigger option. It would be nice | to have at least a full A4/letter size screen. It would | make dealing with PDFs a much better experience. | unethical_ban wrote: | I think that as e-ink gets better and better refresh rates, | that having it as a grayscale monitor for things like | textbooks/markup and browsing the web will make sense. Having | an e-ink tablet to browse HN, check email and read the | morning paper sounds pretty nice. I used to get the NYTimes | delivered to my Kindle each morning. | asdf123wtf wrote: | Forget grayscale, E-ink is going color. Early color devices | are on the market already. And there are displays in the | works that are fast enough to render video. | | I'm really looking forward to the future of e-ink displays. | Arainach wrote: | That's not this product. The point to a device like the | Remarkable is that it _can 't_ do those things. I could | have an iPad Pro with a better pen, the full power of | OneNote, etc., but it's way too easy to go get distracted | by HN or email or a news flash. The Remarkable is a _focus_ | device. | dredmorbius wrote: | I picked up the Onyx BOOX Max Lumi, a 13.3" e-ink tablet and | bookreader earlier this year. I'm mostly happy with it. I'm far | happier with it than I have been with my earlier Android devices | (10 years of phone and 6 of tablet use), though the BOOX is in | fact an Android 10 device, though not fully Google-compliant. It | also has 4x the onboard storage of the Remarkable2, at 64 GB | rather than 16 GB (more below). That alone was the convincing | factor for me. | | The display is gorgeous. 1650x2200 pixels at 207 dpi 16 shade | greyscale. It reads wonderfully in direct sunlight, and well | under any interior lighting conditions with the "Frontlight" to | assist. Unlike emissive displays, frontlight + increased room | light _increases_ readability. | | The stock bookreader software ("Neoreader") is good at reading, | less so at organising (more below). Well-processed books directly | rendered from markup can generally be viewed landscape at 2-up, | for a more booklike experience (ePubs of course as well). Even | lower-quality scans of 3-column articles from before the age of | computer typesetting are readable without having to zoom the | page. (Most recently I've been going through the Whole Earth | Catalog's back-editions --- the pasted-in layout, often with | patterned or coloured overlays, is ... almost always ... | readable. It's a good test of bad quality typography.) | | I'd written a bit recently on the fact that tablets are for the | most part _not_ a viable device cateogory, with far too many | design compromises. The notable exceptions being ebook readers, | baby pacifiers, and watching videos. For any other task, a laptop | (even a small and cheap one) is far more capable. See the | following, most of the meat is in my subsequent comments: | https://joindiaspora.com/posts/880e5c403edb013918e1002590d8e... | | My principle uses are as a book/document reader, accessing my | Pocket archive (more below), and some Android use (Web, podcasts, | Termux). I _hadn 't_ expected to use the note-taking feature at | all, but that is actually surprisingly good and habit-forming. | | The BOOX is, of course, a tablet, but it's one with a few | interesting twists. | | - Display: Pixels are cheap, paints are expensive, persistence | costs nothing, viewability _increases_ rather than _decreases_ as | ambient lighting increases, and colours are nonexistent. (There | are colour e-ink devices, performance is middlin ', price is not | ... _too_ outrageous, sizes tend to the smaller.) Contrast is | lower than paper, though it 's good. Video is possible, if far | from optimal. Issues with colour-discrimination can be an issue | in apps and websites. Multiple modes trading increased quality | for faster refresh. Video can be viewed, though it's not pretty. | Line-art and halftone rendering is excellent. | | - Battery: Claim is a month of standbye, a week of normal use. I | am _not_ a normal user, my goal was to not have range-anxiety. I | can go a day or two between charges, and charging is fast (1--2 | hours to full), whilst using the device for much of the day. | _This is more than sufficient and exceeds expectations._ | | - Storage: My goal is to have a portable and _well-organised_ | library (more on the 2nd bit below). I have well over 64 GB in | texts alone, and also use devices for podcasts. I 've already | chewed through most of the capacity of the BOOX (system and apps | also require some space), and would prefer a 128--256 _or larger_ | storage option. The fact that Remarkable2 is limited to 16 GB | _given the pitifully low costs of storage_ , for a device | principally aimed at reading, is ... inexplicable. | | - WiFi: 2.4G & 5G (unsure what specs). Slightly less range than | my earlier tablet, though still adequate and reliable. | | - Bluetooth. Mostly for the optional $35 keyboard, though also | capable of sharing audio to speakers. | | - Touch: Works better than expected. Note-taking in particular is | excellent. The display depth is slightly increased (due to | various layers?), so drawing may be difficult, but for text notes | and rough diagraming, it's actually pretty addictive. | | - Audio: Two speakers and (counter to my initial belief) an | onboard mic. More than sufficient for listening to podcasts. | | - Camera: None. | | - Security: A mixed bag. Device password is only available with | Onyx's Cloud service, which is inexcusable. No device encryption. | I treat the device as largely untrusted. | | - Interface: Usable, with some kinks and personality. Occasional | instances of Engrish / Chinglish. | | - Android: On basis, this was a strike against the device, though | given it's reasonably Google-Free, the Google App store does | _not_ work, and F-Droid offers a useful selection of much-better- | behaved applications, a feature. Access to some Android settings | (e.g., device UUID reset) aren 't provided. The device is | actually a rather better tablet than I'd hoped (which increases | distractions). | | - Stock apps: The bookreader, storage manager, a web browser (re- | badged and e-ink optimised Chromium AFAICT), clock, calendar | (with no alarms!), calculator, and a few other stock apps exist. | Most are specifically designed for e-ink and benefit by this. | Features are fairly spare. | | - Note-taking: Surprisingly good. This wasn't a key interest, but | the ability to simply _write what I want to capture_ , as well as | diagram and annotate freely, makes up for much of the keyboard | lack. | | - Apps: Supposedly the Google App Store can be enabled, though | I've found this doesn't work. I consider this to be a feature. | Instead I rely on F-Droid and APK Mirror to install Fennec Fox, | EinkBro (a browser, more below), Pocket, Termux, a Feeder (RSS), | VLC, Wikipedia, and a _very_ small handful of other apps. | | - EinkBro Browser: (Additional install, not stock.) This is a web | browser specifically engineered for e-ink devices. It features | full-screen immersive mode (no app or device menus), paginated | navigation (fewer paints), a Reader Mode, print-to-PDF, a | verticle-text mode (for Japanese text). It is lacking an | Incognito mode, and some of the features are rough (adblock, JS, | and cookie whitelists can be added, but not edited or | individually removed). For pages which are painful in Fennec Fox, | it's a very handy fallback option. I still principally use Fennec | as a browser. As an exemplar of eink-aware UI/UX, it's excellent. | | - Pocket: Installed via APK Mirror (the F-Droid version is | woefully obsolete). All my standard frustrations exist, though at | least it's available. See: | https://old.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/5x2sfx/pocket_... | (HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19763106) But at least | it's there. | | - Termux: The Linux-environment-on-Android utility lives up to | its reputation of the one Android App That Does Not Completely | And Specifically Suck. It also continues to be periodically | garbage-collected by Android, though that's not Termux's fault. | There's a black-on-white eink display style which suits the BOOX | wonderfully, and "Speed Mode" display seems to work best on text. | The Onyx hardware keyboard does _NOT_ include an "esc" key, | which is quite frustrating for this vim addict. | | I do have some complaints. | | Storage. I'd prefer 128 GB -- 512 GB available -- enough to store | thousands of books _and_ audio episodes, without any concern for | running out of storage. It 's less a factor of "what's | sufficient" and more "why allow a few dollars in cost stand in | the way of sufficient storage?" 512 GB microSD now costs about | $50. I paid more than that for the cover for the device. | | Root. I'd prefer a rootable device. AFAICT the BOOX is not. | | The bookreader and storage utility don't facilitate organising | and managing content. This seems to be a weak point of many ebook | tools. In particular: - I'd like to be able to edit / add | metadata to documents _from within the document itself_ , based | on the Dublin Core metadata + tags. I'm mostly be interested in | title, author, publication, and date, though other fields also | prove useful. Search should be metadata-aware. The storage | utility should also provide for metadata managment. I'm | interested in media / library management tools that integrate | with tablets. | | Android management tools are generally lacking. Onyx's rebranding | of Android removes most of the configuration tools. | | Instability. The device does crash and kill apps from time to | time. That's probably on Android, but increases certain types of | anxiety. Restarting every few days isn't a bad idea. No worse | than any other Android device I've had. But I've rarely had | printed books crash on me. | | Keyboard: Please include "esc" on tablet keyboards. | wastholm wrote: | I bought a Remarkable 2 a month or two ago because I wanted a | cool hackable e-ink Linux computer. But instead I immediately | started using it as an e-book and document reader and note-taking | pad, and nothing else. And, so far at least, that's perfect. | | The screen is beautiful (a bit gray, but the black is really | black so the contrast is still good), the device is thin and | reasonably light, I only have to charge it once a week or so, and | there are absolutely no distractions. I have even rediscovered | the visceral pleasantness of writing by hand. | | I especially like that it's *not* running Android (which I | dislike more with each release). The biggest drawbacks, to me, | are the fragile pen nibs and the inability to just SCP a PDF or | EPUB to the device and have it work (their sync software works | but isn't great). | freeqaz wrote: | You can actually SCP into the device without any modification. | It's under the Copyright section of the device. It'll show you | the default SSH password for your device and then you can drop | files in there. :) | gpm wrote: | You can, but getting the reader to pick up a new pdf involves | | - Setting up a bit of metadata | | - Restarting the system service | | it's not quite as simple as `scp file remarkable:/folder` | flatiron wrote: | i don't haven the device but the above sounds like a 10 | line shell script to me. slap files in a local directory, | execute script, see screen flash on device, items loaded. | gpm wrote: | That sounds about right in terms of complexity. | | Maybe 20, the metadata format is a bit verbose. | | Screen more than flashes, it exits to the entry screen, | navigation state isn't saved. | blumomo wrote: | For me it's much easier to drop files to reMarkable using | RCU [0], works over wifi, too. | | [0] http://www.davisr.me/projects/rcu/ | wastholm wrote: | Sure, you can SCP all the files you want but even if they're | PDFs or EPUBs they won't show up in the interface. (I can't | remember if I actually tried this or if I just read it | somewhere. Maybe it's worth a shot.) | stewbrew wrote: | Since you can connect via ssh to the device you should be able | to use SCP too, shouldn't you? | | I personally prefer to mount the cloud via some fuse-based | solution though. | Abishek_Muthian wrote: | > inability to just SCP a PDF or EPUB to the device | | Do they support document delivery through email like Kindle? | Recently I showcased[1] 'HN to Kindle' here and someone asked | for Remarkable tablet support, But I didn't get an answer | regarding email delivery. | | Update: A quick search on their website says documents can be | emailed out of the device i.e. sharing, But there doesn't seem | to be a way to email content to the device. | | [1]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27483159 | j6m8 wrote: | Yup. That was my main complaint with it, too. I wrote this | package to add email uploads: | | https://github.com/remailable/remailable | | The rM is a delightful product to hack on. | sanderjd wrote: | Man, I got the thing because I _wanted_ to use it as an ebook | and document reader, but it 's totally failed at that for me. I | spent hours working on a decent system for getting books on the | thing and came up empty. I think it would be good for reading | and taking notes on academic papers, but I mostly read books, | and I couldn't figure out how to get most books on there. A lot | of this is Amazon's fault for kindle being a proprietary | format, but a lot of it is also the non-Amazon e-book community | for failing to provide solutions that are as user friendly as | Amazon is. | | Edit: But yeah, I _love_ the hardware. It just isn 't | functional enough for me to use it regularly, which is a | bummer. | gspr wrote: | > the inability to just SCP a PDF or EPUB to the device and | have it work (their sync software works but isn't great). | | Are you aware of the web interface? It's only available over | USB, and requires flipping a switch in the settings. That | interface is so simple that I imagine that an scp replacement | is just an novice-level curl invocation away. | wastholm wrote: | Yes, but the "only over USB" thing is unfortunate so I find | myself mostly using the bundled cloud service, which is | usually something I try to avoid relying on. Some sort of | peer-to-peer sync like Syncthing would be great. | pjerem wrote: | When I had a Remarkable, I installed KOReader on it. It | transforms the e-book experience from "really poor" to "really | power user". | andrei_says_ wrote: | Can you also get kindle on it? | | Nova devices are android so kindle, safari reader, and any | ePub, pdf etc. book are a breeze to install. | neves wrote: | Is it good to read PDFs? | keedon wrote: | Pretty good, and you can make notes & highlight them too | bm1362 wrote: | Frankly no, it doesn't re-flow them so the text will often be | too small. Quite a massive oversight and no one really talks | about it. | noobly wrote: | That is really too bad. Hopefully there's either a larger | device or upgrade soon, I've been waiting a long time for | something like the reMarkable to mature into a product that | fits my needs. | anigbrowl wrote: | That's a legitimate criticism, and one reason I've held off | buying one. I wonder how long it would take to get a screen | size of 13.5" (about the same as US letter paper size, | which is what most pdfs are formatted for). | Loughla wrote: | That is legitimately the one thing I wish was different | about the RM2 - the screen is 1/3 or so smaller than a | regular sheet of paper. If it were 1:1 with a sheet of | paper, I would absolutely love this thing. | eloisant wrote: | There is the Sony Digital Paper DPTS1, but it's very | expensive. | anigbrowl wrote: | I see it's been replaced by the Sony DPT-RP1, though | that's still expensive. At least this is proof it's | possible and creates hope for competitors to emerge. | krastanov wrote: | I am surprised anyone would want reflow in their PDFs (that | is what epub is for). The PDFs I read would be completely | ruined even by minor reflow (e.g. I work with two-column | text with many inline figures and math). PDF inherently as | a format is not meant to have reflow. | | With that context, I love reading PDFs on my remarkable 2. | Zooming and panning also works pretty well (given the slow | refresh rate of e-ink). | ipsum2 wrote: | Reflow is offered by Adobe: | https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2020/09/23/adobe- | unveils-a... | | Unfortunately you have to send the file to their servers, | which is probably a no-go for many. | _ph_ wrote: | Actually you can. The IP address is shown at the bottom of the | copyright notice, you can ssh into the device and once your | have put your ssh keys onto it, just scp onto it (the ip | changes on reboot). Unfortunately, you cannot just copy the | documents, but you have to bundle them with some meta data, it | is pretty trivial to construct, I made a small script, will try | to share it at some time. | flatiron wrote: | you can fix the ip changing on reboot by pegging the MAC to | an IP in your router. if you are also running something like | pi-hole you can give it a local dns entry too, which makes it | even easier to remember. | krastanov wrote: | On my OS at least (ubuntu and probably many others) it can | resolve by hostname (after all that is the whole point of | having hostnames). So I just do `ssh remarkable` without | even having an `.ssh` entry for it. | neilv wrote: | That can work, if your LAN router's DHCP and DNS are set | up to respect the hostname suggested by the client, to | update it in the DNS for the LAN domain, and tell DHCP | clients to use the router for DNS. | | For LAN devices you want to access as a server, I think | it's usually easiest and most reliable to just designate | a permanent IPv4 address for them with your router's DHCP | server, like what OP suggested. | | Your SSH client will probably prefer static IP addresses, | too, for the record-keeping it probably does about which | servers it knows and at what addresses. | nafizh wrote: | Same here. RM2 is probably one of my best investments for | research and learning ever. Only drawback is I cannot read it | without light at night. Would have been perfect if there was a | back light like kindle. | kcartlidge wrote: | I was seriously considering popping over to their site and | ordering an RM2. But no backlight? That's a show-stopper for | me - thanks for mentioning it as I think I just assumed it | would have one given that most eReaders do. | jader201 wrote: | > I have even rediscovered the visceral pleasantness of writing | by hand. | | A bit unrelated, but I've often wondered if I'm in the minority | that hates writing by hand. Compared to typing, I'm much | slower, and it looks terrible -- I print in caps just so that | it's remotely legible. | | I avoid handwriting at all costs, and loath the few times it's | required. | asdff wrote: | It might seem obvious but the less you write the more | illegible your handwriting seems to you. I noticed this | during school. Over summers I would pretty much never have to | handwrite anything, and in august I had all the same gripes | that you do about my slow illegible terrible looking | handwriting. Those kinks would be worked out two weeks into | the school year, after your hand is back in shape from | writing notes 8+ hours a day. | | The other thing about handwriting is that you remember things | better. The act of transmuting something you've heard, put it | into a thought, then taking that thought and stroking out | words on a distinct location on a physical page taps into all | these levels of comprehension and processing that you just | miss if you take the stenographer approach with a keyboard | and transcribe directly what you hear, or even writing | digitally on the exact same 8x10 screen day in day out. I've | fallen asleep in lectures with my hands on the keyboard mid | sentence typing up some note, because the effort required by | your brain is so much smaller and you are not nearly as | engaged as when you are actually stroking out words and in | the background thinking about how to fit relevant information | on a unique 8'x11' sheet of paper. | Nursie wrote: | I'm terrible at it, but I enjoy fountain pens. They make me | slow down enough that it's at least legible, where my biro- | scrawl is very much not. It is hard not to let my brain race | ahead though, as it does when I'm typing. | | Also fountain pens are shiny and you can get all sorts of | inks and accessories! | meristohm wrote: | Have you tried writing with your other hand, if you have it? | Writing with my non-dominant hand is slower and more precise. | It's been twenty-odd years of practice, in part in case I | lose a hand, and it continues to feel like a fun, healthy | challenge. | crussmann wrote: | Over the last years, I felt my handwriting was deteriorating. | I blamed my lack of practice and reliance on computers, and | accepted that. | | But, last year I got glasses. With them, my hand writing | quickly improved. As an aside, I can type a lot faster on a | touch screen now too. Presbyopia snuck up on me somewhere | when I hit 40... | jfb wrote: | I hate my handwriting, but the physical act of longhand | absolutely helps me with retention, so I have a reMarkable. | It's a pretty great device. | musingsole wrote: | Writing text by hand is certainly slower than typing. | | Unless you're filling out a form or writing an essay in | school, handwritten things should use more symbolic language. | Use a shorthand of words and images and arrows and circles | that are meaningful to you. Whether or not someone else (or | even you later) can read it is really a secondary concern. | marshmellman wrote: | Yes, I'm in that minority too. I've always had poor | handwriting and always hated writing by hand. | | After introspecting about it, I realized that, for me, it's | because of low grade stress during handwriting, as my | attention is constantly churned between thinking about the | content and about legibility. | xattt wrote: | I worked in positions that required me to write by hand more | than I had in the last decade. I found that my handwriting | found an equilibrium that balanced speed and legibility after | a while. | | Perhaps consider changing your writing technique? | renewiltord wrote: | My handwriting is fine but I am slow af compared to editing | in a vimlike. Definitely agree with you. None of this writing | stuff appeals to me. | | The drawing maybe. | eloisant wrote: | When I take notes I usually don't limit myself to writing | to lines, I write on the sides, makes arrows, etc... For | this "visual note taking" paper (or e-ink tablet) is way | better. | Aeolun wrote: | I use handwriting for thinking, not writing. I don't really | expect to be able to recover the things I write down more | than 2 weeks after the fact without some extra work. | macintux wrote: | I took the LSAT on a lark about 20 years ago, and at the time | they required an essay written in cursive. Took me a couple | of hours just to reconstruct my distant memories of how to | write cursive, and I hated every minute of the essay itself. | jader201 wrote: | Yes, this exact single moment in my life is often recalled | any time the subject of handwriting in cursive comes up. | | That essay was a complete mess. I was even thinking of that | as I wrote my above post. Hilarious that someone else | mentioned it. | EvanAnderson wrote: | You're not alone. I appreciate that some people enjoy hand- | writing (the act itself, the ergonomics, and all the various | bits of physical ephemera that accompany it-- pens, papers, | etc) but for me typing's sheer efficiency and inherent | machine-readability (not to mention being readable by other | humans) wins every time. | 0_____0 wrote: | I long hated writing, and like you only wrote in block | capitals, until I decided to re-learn to write cursive. | Mostly I wanted to be able to write sweet paper notes to my | lovers that didn't look like a 5th grader wrote them. I've | found that when the process is approached as art, maybe even | meditation, it's far more pleasurable than an act simply | meant to record words on paper. | akiselev wrote: | The Remarkable 2 drawing app also comes with a calligraphy | pen, which does wonders for the readability of many | people's cursive. | xeromal wrote: | Anytime I write in print, I'm slow and janky but cursive | seems to flow out of my hand. By default, it's not very | legible except to me but I actually appreciate how it looks | and it's easy to focus it when writing to someone else. | Cursive definitely flows much easier than print. My only | gripe with writing in general is that writing left handed | excludes me from about 92% of pens that will streak under | my hand. | aidenn0 wrote: | Being left handed, you've probably found this, but the | Zebra Sarasa Dry is what my left handed daughter uses. | It's the only cheapish pen that she likes | clairity wrote: | yes, in cobalt blue, they're perfect. much better than | the pilot g2's that preceded them. | toomuchtodo wrote: | Can you share any resources you used to learn and improve | your writing? My love letters can always be better. | ngngngng wrote: | I worked for about a month a few years back to improve my | writing. I just found an example of handwriting I liked | and would spend time each morning copying individual | characters, then words. Very slowly at first, then it | became natural. My handwriting has slipped since then, | seems to be something you need to keep working at from | time to time. | 0_____0 wrote: | I've done it twice in my adult life. The first time, I | was unhappy with my block capitals, and looked up the | letter form references for architectural block lettering, | and spend a few hours over a week or so just practicing | letter forms. I, in a very literal way, installed a font | in meatspace :) | | Cursive I think is really more just about getting a feel | for the flow of script. There are some technical aspects, | like the letter forms themselves, and the rules of | joining them -- not all letters in a word can or should | be joined, which is obvious to long-time cursive users | but was not to me! | | But mostly it comes down to knowing the letter forms, and | then just _using_ cursive. Write a dear friend a sweet | note. Write a couple pages in your diary on occasion. | Your forms will become clearer and will flow better with | practice. Embellish! Draw huge risers and tails on your | letters and pretend you 're writing in elvish or | something. haha. | hallarempt wrote: | I wooed my wife with my handwritten letters... Thirty years | ago. Of course, these days, I'm also her wife, and my | handwriting isn't so good anymore. But my Remarkable 2, | after the latest software updates is remarkably good. Now I | wish we could reconvene our RPG club from thirty years ago, | because it's the best RPG notes device I've ever used, | better than paper, because it's more flexible. | moelf wrote: | https://twitter.com/KenoFischer/status/1333952722849198084 | xwowsersx wrote: | I have been looking at the Remarkable 2 and other devices in | the category. My use case is taking notes on CS and maths, | which both often require diagrams and other drawings. Can you | speak to how well it works for something like this and how it | compares to note-taking with a pen and paper? | marvindanig wrote: | My experience: iPad with a pencil is much better. But it is a | personal choice in the end, I'd say. | riidom wrote: | I have a ReMarkable 2 as well, and there are zero drawing | tools or alike, if you want some graphical object, you just | draw it. | | You have a multitude of background-guides (lines, grids, | etc.) for easier aligning. | | The only features you have that you don't get with pen&paper | are a layer system and a select tool which you can use for | copy/paste/cut or move parts around. | | Page management is pretty basic, but ok. You have notebooks | which are folders of pages and you can change their order. | noobly wrote: | Are you able to achieve a split-screen-like functionality, | so you can do scratch work while referencing the text? | Groxx wrote: | Unfortunately no. Not even with the 3rd party | modifications. Though there are some full GUI linux | installs iirc. | | It's a common question in the community Discord, and the | official patches have been accelerating and implementing | a lot of long-asked-for features (e.g. pinch to zoom), | but nobody really knows what's on their roadmap. So hard | to say if it'll ever get side-by-side. | noobly wrote: | Hopefully they add open sourcing the whole stack to their | roadmap. That'd be the best thing they can do imo. I'm so | eager for a device like this that I can 100% get behind. | Terretta wrote: | iPad Pro with Apple Pencil ... and the paper texture screen | cover shown here last year. | Loughla wrote: | I use the Remarkable 2 daily. It feels like writing in a | notebook - the screen gives you just a little bit of drag | like a mechanical pencil and paper would. Very good to use. | afandian wrote: | My first thought was "if you can SSH then you can pipe" and, | like magic, you can pipe the wacom device from /dev through SSH | to a computer. | | The result was this: https://gitlab.com/afandian/pipes-and- | paper | | Blog post https://blog.afandian.com/2020/10/pipes-and-paper- | remarkable... | | It's kind of abandonware now, but some others have made some | great forks! | | https://gitlab.com/afandian/pipes-and-paper/-/forks | | https://github.com/flomlo/rm2canvas | owenfi wrote: | This is amazing! | [deleted] | aerique wrote: | I use rMAPI to push and pull stuff from the machine. Not sure | if it works for the rm2 as well. | | Also, it requires storing your stuff on reMarkable's servers | ('cloud'). | | https://github.com/juruen/rmapi | abawany wrote: | I love rmapi and use it often with my rM2. | sabauma wrote: | I find rmapi + fzf to be the easiest way to send ebooks in | my Calibre library to my rM2. | | Its probably possible to create a Calibre addon to do this, | but its already makes syncing pretty easy. | Jedd wrote: | Have you looked at: | | https://github.com/Evidlo/remarkable_syncthing | | I don't have a remarkable, and have therefore not experimented | with this software. But it's the approach I'd prefer if / when | I get a device like this. | wastholm wrote: | I have not but it looks interesting so I will. Thanks! | Deukhoofd wrote: | I bought a Remarkable 2 myself, and I have to say I'm really | happy with it. The built in e-reader was a bit mediocre, but a | quick SSH session and a couple community scripts later and with | just a long swipe across the screen I could access Koreader | whenever I wanted. | base698 wrote: | Link? | d4rkp4ttern wrote: | I have an RM2 and use it a lot but the jagged lines bother me. | I got the Onyx Boox and returned it, the software was just too | clunky and did not have the paper feel, instead felt very | plasticky | mstipetic wrote: | I don't understand how they put so little effort into software | compared to hardware. They raised money recently they should be | able to hire a decent software team, but I'm afraid they'll | start pushing towards subscription only features now | michaelmior wrote: | I only have the reMarkable 1, but I've actually been pretty | happy with the software on the device on the constant | upgrades. What has been really disappointing is the clunky | desktop and mobile apps and the fact that there's no Web app. | Personally I wish they would just abandon the desktop and | mobile apps and build a great Web app that works OK | everywhere. | gspr wrote: | > but I'm afraid they'll start pushing towards subscription | only features now | | Considering the hackability of the device, and how all the | cloud services are opt-in, I don't see how that would do them | any good. | fouric wrote: | "so little effort into software"? Quite the opposite, it | seems like they've put a _lot_ of effort into the software. | Everything "just works" and is _polished_ , unlike almost | every other piece of software I've ever used. | | Don't mistake a lack of advanced features for a lack of | software effort. reMarkable is making an intentional trade- | off - more feature quality, less feature quantity. | | See also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27516894 | Arainach wrote: | I'm all for fewer polished features - but we don't get any | of those. | | Prior to the latest updates I actively regretted my | reMarkable 2 purchase. Now it's back to "a decent device | that I would never recommend anyone pay full price for" | | Let's start with eReading: Hyperlinks in ePub and PDF | didn't work. As such, your table of contents and index are | worthless, you don't have quick access to footnotes, and so | on. They only very recently finally added this in the 2.6 | update. | | If links don't work they must have some way to jump between | pages easily, right? No, wrong again. Jumping to a page | number is 3 clicks deep (pretty sure it was 4 prior to | 1.17): Upper left corner, page overview, "Go to page". You | then have to move from the top of the screen to the bottom | to enter the page number and then back to the top since | they couldn't be bothered to put an enter/OK button with | the other buttons. | | Then there's the controls in general. To switch between | writing utensils, you need the left menu. This covers your | document content and there's no way to just scale the | content into the remaining space. This means that to work | on an entire document you need to be constantly opening and | closing that menu. There's not even a way to have the | button backgrounds be transparent so you can read what's | behind them without interacting. | | Search is very slow. It takes FOREVER to index a book, and | you're given no indication of if it's done. Instead, if I | open a large PDF and search, I will be told that there are | no results rather than that it hasn't finished looking yet. | If I wait 15 seconds, things may magically appear on my | screen unexpectedly. | | eBooks are slow to load, and changing text size requires | you to wait while the entire book is rerendered (losing | your notes in the process since they're image-based rather | than proper annotations) | | This is primarily a drawing/creation device. A basic tool | that would help here is stroke-based erasing. They have | stroke knowledge since Undo supports that, but the eraser | is a clumsy mess that reminds me of the worst cheap | elementary school supplies. | | While we're on basic UX, why is the entire device in "light | mode" except for the settings app which is inverted into | dark mode with no way to change it to a normal UX? | | Those are all off the top of my head. I have a much longer | list of thoughts in a document somewhere. My overall point | is that my expectations a full Android device with fancy | editors. My expectations were an optimized focus/creation | device, but the software lets the hardware down in a bad | way even for their core scenarios of reading, annotating, | and drawing. | fouric wrote: | > I'm all for fewer polished features - but we don't get | any of those. | | I don't think that the rest of your comment substantiates | this. You don't have any arguments that the _core | functionality_ is lacking in some way - everything you | say seems to be about non-core things. | | > Hyperlinks in ePub and PDF didn't work. | | Note the "didn't", and also PDF hyperlinks is not an | "essential" feature for the purpose of the rm2, which is | _writing and annotating_. | | > If links don't work they must have some way to jump | between pages easily, right? | | Not core to writing and annotating. You're looking for a | document-navigation system, which the rm2 is _not_. | | > Search is very slow. | | See previous comment about the rm2 not meant to be a | document-navigation system. | | > eBooks are slow to load, and changing text size | requires you to wait while the entire book is rerendered | (losing your notes in the process since they're image- | based rather than proper annotations) | | This might be the only valid complaint here, although | it's still a non-essential feature. An _essential_ | feature is the ability to _take notes_ , which you can. | | > This is primarily a drawing/creation device. | | That's literally how it's marketed - "Writing, reading, | and visualizing only". | | > A basic tool that would help here is stroke-based | erasing. They have stroke knowledge since Undo supports | that, but the eraser is a clumsy mess that reminds me of | the worst cheap elementary school supplies. | | The eraser tool is perfectly functional. I use it | continually with no problems. Could it be better? Yes, | like almost every piece of software ever written. Is it | "a clumsy mess"? Not even close. | | > While we're on basic UX, why is the entire device in | "light mode" except for the settings app which is | inverted into dark mode with no way to change it to a | normal UX? | | That's a single UX issue, among many things that they got | right, that has little impact on the usability of the | device. | | You neglected to mention how the drawing, cut/copy/paste, | convert-to-text, eraser, templates, and almost every | other feature "just work". You _do_ get all of those | "polished features" - your stretch goals are not core | functionality. | Arainach wrote: | >That's literally how it's marketed - "Writing, reading, | and visualizing only". | | >Not core to writing and annotating. You're looking for a | document-navigation system, which the rm2 is not. | | Document navigation is absolutely a core part of reading. | When I read a book, I page around it because that's how | books work. When I reference a book I've already read, I | want to look in the index or the table of contents and go | there. | | There are 6 things that reMarkable claims the device does | on their homepage. "All your notes, organized and | accessible on all devices" and "Take handwritten notes, | read, and review documents" are two of them. Reading and | searching are core scenarios. | leadingthenet wrote: | I don't personally own a reMarkable, so I have no idea if | this is related to what you're mentioning, but version | 2.7 does seem to have added improved navigation of the | sort you're describing: | https://blog.remarkable.com/software-update-2-7-small- | steps-... | mstipetic wrote: | If a guy could create amazing ux improvements without | access to code [1] and by binary patching I'd assume a vc | funded company could also. I consider this patch to be | essential for my sanity | | [1] https://github.com/ddvk/remarkable-hacks | Deukhoofd wrote: | The software is fine for note taking, and reading and | annotating PDFs, which is what I mostly use it for at work. | The reader does however not feel set up for reading books. | With it being fairly trivial to install Koreader however this | turned into a non-issue to me. | figers wrote: | Onyx Boox Note Air Is extremely fragile. I had mine in a case in | my backpack. Not a scratch on the screen, not a crack anywhere. | The E-ink has crazy lines in it, not sure if it was pressure in | the back pack but be careful. I loved the device, reading and | writing on it was awesome but the company wanted $200 to fix it | plus shipping both ways. Thankfully Amazon made an exception and | I got all my money back. | danShumway wrote: | What's the situation with reMarkable 2's privacy? I'm interested | in it as an extensible Linux device, but part of that would mean | connecting it to a network to take advantage of SSH support. | | Is there a way completely turn off analytics so it _never_ | connects to a remote server at all without my permission? Can I | disable updates without disconnecting it from the network? Or is | there a replacement OS /hack that can disable any data | collection? | | I get nervous around proprietary software, even if it is | extensible. I like that I can SSH onto the device itself, I like | a Linux base, but I want to know that I'm not going to be | fighting with their UI layer for control in the future. | | I guess KoReader exists, but as far as I know from other | e-readers KoReader doesn't actually replace anything, it just | runs automatically after the normal OS has booted. I want the | ability to completely disable any part of the OS that would be | reaching out to a remote server without my permission. | afandian wrote: | It appears as a virtual network device via USB, so it's | completely functional without WiFi. | danShumway wrote: | Sure, but part of the appeal to me is WiFi access. That's | where things like Syncthing or using the device as a handheld | tablet input during meetings would be very powerful. | | I can quarantine everything, but I don't want to quarantine | the device, I want to be able to connect it to WiFi and take | advantage of its networking features while trusting that it | won't send a bunch of data somewhere. | gpm wrote: | > Is there a way completely turn off analytics so it never | connects to a remote server at all without my permission? | | I could be wrong, but I don't think it sends any analytics. I'd | be very surprised if it did for devices not connected to their | cloud service. | | They're covered by the gdpr, and the privacy policy doesn't | mention any... https://support.remarkable.com/hc/en- | us/articles/36000041647... | | If it does you could certainly set up iptable rules to do so... | but that would admittedly be a bit of a pain. | | > Can I disable updates without disconnecting it from the | network? | | Yes, there's a toggle in the UI | | > Or is there a replacement OS/hack that can disable any data | collection? | | Again, not sure if there is any data collection or even | outgoing network traffic if you have the cloud services off. | The hard part of a replacement OS would be controlling the | screen, I don't think anyone has done that. | hinkley wrote: | "I will trim this part out." | | I've often wondered if they always say that, or only in 100% of | the cases where they forgot to trim 'this part' out? | JanisErdmanis wrote: | I own both Remarkable and an the same size android eink tablet | which I ordered on kickstarter. I use my remerkable tablet almost | everywhere from reading and annotating PDFs to making excessively | complex calculations for my PhD and sending them directly to my | supervisour. The best part that I can just lay on the bed while I | do so ;) | | I thought it would be great to read online articles as I read | books on remarkable, check email and etc. so I ordered another | Android eink tablet. It was a great purchasing mistake which I | barely use today. | | The morale is that eink screen is very limited with it's refresh | rate and lack of color making software as significant as | hardware. | sammorrowdrums wrote: | I recently did a review of the RM2 vs Onyx Boox Max Lumi. I still | own them both. | | https://sammorrowdrums.com/e-writers-remarkable-2-v-s ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-06-15 23:00 UTC)