[HN Gopher] Critical entities targeted in suspected Chinese cybe... ___________________________________________________________________ Critical entities targeted in suspected Chinese cyber spying Author : shivbhatt Score : 78 points Date : 2021-06-15 13:58 UTC (9 hours ago) (HTM) web link (apnews.com) (TXT) w3m dump (apnews.com) | dang wrote: | All: if you're going to comment on this story please make sure | you're up on the site guidelines and that you're _not_ about to | take the thread into generic political or nationalistic flamewar. | Those things are beyond tedious, inevitably turn ugly, and are | not what HN is for. | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | echelon wrote: | The new cold war is here. The narratives everywhere are starting | to change in support of it, and I wager that the rhetoric is | going to continue to escalate. | | Suddenly "lab leak" isn't racist and isn't implausible. | | Biden is going to go cozy up with Putin, which was at one time | unthinkable. | | Reddit and other social media has drastically shifted tone. | Patriotic voices are upvoted, positive opinions on China | downvoted. | | Supply chains are moving (especially semiconductor supply chains | and critical components). | | One of the things I'm surprised by: Thinkpads are getting | criticism. I was looking to buy a new one the other day and there | was hostility in the forums over China. | | On the other side of the ocean, Chinese propaganda has heated up | too. Yesterday state media supposedly published an image of the | G7 as The Last Supper. | | Those UFO drones are probably either China or the US. | | Where will we be in five years? Is this going to continue | escalating into more than just words? | president wrote: | Is it though? You don't hear about any of the Chinese malign | activities on the mainstream media outside of the lab leak | theory. On most social media you get deranked or chastised for | bringing them up. | [deleted] | AnimalMuppet wrote: | Well, right here in the article we're discussing, we hear | about Chinese hacking (from AP, which is very much mainstream | media). | | Also today, on mainstream media, I saw an article about | Chinese jet fighters and bombers encroaching (yet again) on | Taiwan's airspace. | | So I think that, yes, you _do_ hear about Chinese malign | activities on mainstream media, and not just the lab leak | theory. | ilamont wrote: | The New York City subway hack referenced in the article is | interesting. Unlike the many ransomware attacks targeting public | infrastructure, The New York Times reported that economic | espionage was a possible goal: | | _It is unclear why the M.T.A. was a target of the campaign, but | investigators have several theories. One focuses on China's push | to dominate the multibillion-dollar market for rail cars -- an | effort that could benefit from knowing more about the inner | workings of a transit system that awards lucrative contracts._ | | However, the article also said it's possible "hackers mistakenly | entered the M.T.A.'s system and discovered it was of little | interest, which cybersecurity experts say is not unusual." | | https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/02/nyregion/mta-cyber-attack... | azurezyq wrote: | I feel MTA is pretty badly managed and under-budgeted, | absolutely not ideal for a case study even. | fsflover wrote: | Not sure why the commment by echelon is flagged. I think it's a | reasonable observation: | | _The new cold war is here. The narratives everywhere are | starting to change in support of it, and I wager that the | rhetoric is going to continue to escalate. | | Suddenly "lab leak" isn't racist and isn't implausible. | | Biden is going to go cozy up with Putin, which was at one time | unthinkable. | | Reddit and other social media has drastically shifted tone. | Patriotic voices are upvoted, positive opinions on China | downvoted. | | Supply chains are moving (especially semiconductor supply chains | and critical components). | | One of the things I'm surprised by: Thinkpads are getting | criticism. I was looking to buy a new one the other day and there | was hostility in the forums over China. | | On the other side of the ocean, Chinese propaganda has heated up | too. Yesterday state media supposedly published an image of the | G7 as The Last Supper. | | Those UFO drones are probably either China or the US. | | Where will we be in five years? Is this going to continue | escalating into more than just words? _ | ourlordcaffeine wrote: | Well, I think not all his observations are correct. | | >Patriotic voices are upvoted, positive opinions on China | downvoted. | | Fanboying of the CCP is usually downvoted. Useful or positive | discussions about the country and culture aren't. Americans | being overtly patriotic is still often controversial. | | >Thinkpads are getting criticism. I was looking to buy a new | one the other day and there was hostility in the forums over | China. | | Sure is surprising that people don't want to buy stuff from a | country that is throwing Uighurs in concentration camps, from a | company that I recall was caught red handed putting spyware on | devices they sold. | | Although I think the main reason the comment got flagged is | that it isn't a HN style discussion, but looks more like | someone from reddit getting lost and posting here | dang wrote: | Please don't copy-paste comments on HN, and certainly not to | circumvent flagging. That's abusive. | | If you think a flagged comment shouldn't be flagged, you can | vouch for it (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html#cvouch) | or email us at hn@ycombinator.com. | | In this case the comment was obviously a step into generic | political and nationalistic flamewar and so was correctly | flagged. | [deleted] | atarian wrote: | I wonder if we'll start to see a transition back to | analog/physical access. | randomopining wrote: | China, Russia, Iran, NK, maybe Turkey. Pact to chip away at the | US sphere and take what they can. Classic zero sum. We should set | this straight while we still have a chance. | bmmayer1 wrote: | The long-term operational strategy of the CCP (and probably every | other foreign hostile power) is clear. Backdoor all critical and | vital systems. Keep finger on button. Presumably, our folks at | the NSA are doing the same. This becomes the new MAD doctrine. | magicsmoke wrote: | It's not exactly like MAD because with MAD everyone has an | accurate idea of how many nukes they have and the resulting | destruction if they're exchanged. With cyberattacks you can't | get an accurate idea of how backdoored your systems are, | because if you did you would patch it. As a result, countries | underestimate the damage they would take from retaliation and | are more willing to use their collection of backdoors to create | chaos at key moments. If nuclear MAD leans towards deterrence, | cyberattacks lean towards escalation. | drak0n1c wrote: | There's also the question of attribution. Proxies and | manipulated metadata can misdirect the retaliation onto a | different actor. | 3pt14159 wrote: | Well, kinda. | | The actors have different playbooks. America's is "get in as | quietly and as targeted as possible, and make the damage look | like random equipment failing." Which makes sense. If they | wanted to do value targeting at a wide scale they'd use a | nuke or what have you. The mobility the domain of cyber gives | them is deniability and operational security, not | _capability_ since they can basically bomb anywhere on the | planet in under an hour. The dragnet stuff is done via MITM | attacks or with friendlies like telcom and tech companies. | | With the DPRK it's completely different. They don't have | multiple points of access on the global internet. They don't | have the worlds best military jets or satellites. Sure they | have a few nukes, but they can be intercepted, so getting | access to critical infrastructure is something they would | value in the first minutes of a war with America. | | But I agree with your overall premiss. In cyber you can't get | a _completely accurate_ idea of how backdoored your systems | are. There is more observability here than people give credit | for, because we hack the hackers to figure out their access | levels then monitor the intruded on systems, but ultimately | it 's unknowable just what percentage of our systems are | compromised and even if we could somehow know the degree of | compromization, it wouldn't matter because a previously | unused, wormable 0day could infect whole classes of systems | we thought were secure. | mads wrote: | Not sure why the commment by fsflower quoting echelon is | downvoted. I think he points to reasonable observations by | echelon: | | _The new cold war is here. The narratives everywhere are | starting to change in support of it, and I wager that the | rhetoric is going to continue to escalate. | | Suddenly "lab leak" isn't racist and isn't implausible. | | Biden is going to go cozy up with Putin, which was at one time | unthinkable. | | Reddit and other social media has drastically shifted tone. | Patriotic voices are upvoted, positive opinions on China | downvoted. | | Supply chains are moving (especially semiconductor supply chains | and critical components). | | One of the things I'm surprised by: Thinkpads are getting | criticism. I was looking to buy a new one the other day and there | was hostility in the forums over China. | | On the other side of the ocean, Chinese propaganda has heated up | too. Yesterday state media supposedly published an image of the | G7 as The Last Supper. | | Those UFO drones are probably either China or the US. | | Where will we be in five years? Is this going to continue | escalating into more than just words?_ | lazyeye wrote: | Lab leak isnt plausible? Why is a rare virus appearing in the | population, just down the road from a research facility which | holds these kind of viruses, not plausible? | dang wrote: | Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27521255. | Copy/pasting a copy/pasted comment is beyond abusive. Please | don't do anything like this on HN. | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | m3kw9 wrote: | At this point, can we safely suspect every important system is | compromised at one point or another? | sillysaurusx wrote: | I'm not sure there was ever a time when every important system | wasn't compromised in some way. | AnimalMuppet wrote: | By _at least one_ hostile power. Don 't assume that it's _only_ | one... | TaylorAlexander wrote: | Certainly seems every Intel CPU has been compromised for | decades, right? I've not followed it super closely so maybe | I'm missing something. We don't necessarily have exploits "in | the wild" but someone in secret partnership with Intel could | have gotten access to all kinds of things, it seems. | neonate wrote: | https://archive.is/D3fgS ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-06-15 23:00 UTC)