[HN Gopher] NIH study offers new evidence of early SARS-CoV-2 in... ___________________________________________________________________ NIH study offers new evidence of early SARS-CoV-2 infections in U.S. Author : infodocket Score : 109 points Date : 2021-06-15 15:35 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.nih.gov) (TXT) w3m dump (www.nih.gov) | splithalf wrote: | I thought I had covid before news of covid even came out. Was | googling "novel pneumonia type illnesses" and reading about | sequelae. I had had close contact with wuhan travelers in late | dec. 2020. Mostly fatigue and headache for a week, then the lung | issues started and lasted a month or more. A few weeks later the | first couple of California cases from China presented at a local | er. Few cared at that point as the politics were inverted early | on due to the travel ban, and also the super bowl and impeachment | vying for the public's attention. | throwawaysea wrote: | There are thousands of travelers flying from China to the US | every single day. It seems obvious that the earliest infections | would be sooner than January 2020. I remain unsurprised by these | new findings, because past conversations around this topic would | always be shut down or dismissed, leading to no serious, balanced | conversation. Common sense and reasonable speculation were met | with vitriol and people tried to claim a moral high road of | "trusting the science". Just like with the lab leak theory not | actually being "debunked", this too is further evidence of how | echo chambers, politics, and groupthink have corrupted discourse. | inglor_cz wrote: | I, too, had a very bad cold in December 2019 and January 2020. | With a lot of exhausting dry cough and no unusual bacteria | cultivated from samples. Five weeks of utter misery. | | But I had regular Covid-19 a year later and the disease felt | completely different. Whatever was running around Central Europe | back then must have been something else. | throwaway4good wrote: | I think it is fairly obvious that this virus could have | circulated considerably earlier than the first confirmed cases in | Wuhan mid November 2020, given its nature of asymptomic spread | and form of disease which easily could be mistaken for something | else. | | The work with blood sample analysis should be done all over the | planet and its range should be broadened to samples earlier than | January 2020. | mmmrtl wrote: | You can estimate the date of the outbreak's origin with | phylodynamics, using the diversity of circulating SARS-CoV-2 | and its mutation rate to estimate the time to most recent | common ancestor (TMRCA) as 27.11.2019 [CI 07.11.2019 - | 11.12.2019]. "Considerably earlier" doesn't fit the evidence | | https://virological.org/t/update-2-evolutionary-epidemiologi... | throwaway4good wrote: | It could have been spreading somewhere else, undetected or | mistaken for something else. | qwerty1234599 wrote: | It's possible that a mutation emerged in november 2019 that | pushed the R number up. A "mild" form of the virus could very | easily have lingered in China/SEA for years. | floxy wrote: | >given its nature of asymptomatic spread | | Does anyone have a pointer to the latest information on | asymptomatic spread? This is the latest thing I've found, and | it doesn't seem to think asymptomatic spreading is likely. | | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w | mrfusion wrote: | Agreed. | | This is the big study, a city wide screening in Wuhan found | not a single documented case: | | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w | | And beyond that this is a meta-analysis of 54 studies showing | near 0 presymptomatic/asymptomatic rate: | | https://alachuachronicle.com/university-of-florida- | researche... | grawprog wrote: | I have been curious. Back in December 2019, myself, my dad, my | boss and some other friends and family all got sick. It lasted | about 3-4 weeks. It was a weird cold. None of us really got that | sick, but we all felt terrible, weak and lethargic, aches and | pains, slightly feverish some days then not other days, a really | bad sore throat to the point where swallowing hurt and not really | a cough, but badly congested lungs. Breathing was hard and it was | hard to clear the congestion. | | It was the length of time that was the most strange and all of us | were sick for pretty much the same length of time. | | It wasn't the flu, if i get sick that long with the flu, I get | fucked up, and colds never last that long for me. This was just | like a month of general shittyness. Even then it took probably | until around the end of January before I felt 'normal.' again. | | We've all sort of speculated half seriously that maybe we had | covid, but never really took it seriously. | rhino369 wrote: | The chances are really low that it was covid. A lot of colds go | around and many last a long time. Millions of Americans had a | cold in December 2019. A handful likely had COVID-19. You are | probably in the former camp. | grawprog wrote: | I agree, that's why I've never really considered it was | covid. It was just coincidental timing and strange symptoms. | It wouldn't be my first 'weird cold'. I haven't even really | thought about it much until I seen the comment thread here. | Seeing other people's stories reminded me of it. It was just | more of an anecdote to add than anything. | AmVess wrote: | There was a nasty flu going around that winter. I got it in | October/November and it very nearly hospitalized me. I was | down for two solid weeks. | | It was too early for C19, but it was brutal nonetheless. | babyshake wrote: | I got a bad flu in early December 2019. Fever, vomiting, | cramping. It does indeed seem like colds and flus have | gotten considerably more nasty in the last decade. | asdff wrote: | You are also a decade older with a less robust immune | system. That's why these statements are hard to qualify, | too many latent variables. | ceejayoz wrote: | Yeah, my son got pneumonia in late 2019. Tested negative | for previous COVID exposure over the summer of 2020; we | certainly wondered prior to that. | SideburnsOfDoom wrote: | > There was a nasty flu going around that winter. | | Yes, it was a bad flu season, with possibly more than one | of the bad cold or flu in the winter of 2019-2020. I was | ill 3 times in the last 3 months of 2019. On the last one I | went to a doctor who basically said "there's a lot of it | about". | | Also, the last cold that I had, was in February 2020. | rhino369 wrote: | My sister got it and had to skip Christmas. Tested positive | for influenza. | arcticbull wrote: | Sounds like a weird cold. There just wasn't very much COVID | around back then. | testplzignore wrote: | Some of the schools around me closed for a day in late January | 2020 to clean due to an influenza outbreak. I thought it was | strange at the time since there was no evident increase in | illness among adults I know. I figure it was a bad strain that | had been lying dormant for a while, so kids had no immunity to | it. It was very specifically stated at the time to be | influenza, as opposed to just higher-than-normal absences due | to non-specific diseases. I think the absence rate was | something like 30%. | 99_00 wrote: | Did you have side effects after your first covid vaccine? | Apparently that's more likely if you've already had covid. | | https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article25066791... | foobarian wrote: | I had almost the exact same experience in late Jan [edit: | 2020], along with most of my coworkers. I did keep wondering if | I had Covid so I got tested, but with a negative result. The | main piece of evidence that speaks against the Covid theory is | any kind of mortality deviation, which didn't occur until later | half of March. | | Anecdotally, over time I heard many other locales, workspaces | and schools experienced a similar "weird cold." It may not have | been Covid but there was certainly a very widespread, and very | unusual cold in the winter of 2019-2020. | ssully wrote: | You had the same experience in late Jan of 2020 or 2021? | foobarian wrote: | Edited-in the year, apologies. It was Jan 2020. | ssully wrote: | Ahh thank you! I am guessing you are outside of the USA. | Our testing pipeline was basically a shit show until the | end of March 2020 [1]. The first CDC kits (The only tests | authorized) didn't start shipping out until the start of | Feb, and they were later determined to be faulty! | | [1]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2020/0 | 4/18/tim... | foobarian wrote: | No, not at all - I am in MA. Note I did not get tested | immediately, I merely wondered about those winter colds | so many of us experienced until the testing became more | available. Then around June I got an antibody test at an | urgent care clinic to put the question to rest. | | Mind you the test could have still been faulty, but the | mortality data ultimately does not show any anomalies in | that time frame and that's a lot harder to explain under | the hypothesis that it was C19. | sneak wrote: | I've heard stories like this from a lot of people in | Dec/Jan/Feb. Many of them carried on in the months that | followed as if they were already in possession of antibodies, | believing that they "already had covid". | | As others have pointed out, there are lots of cold-and-flu | style illnesses endemic in the human population. There are | antibody tests that can tell you reasonably authoritatively, if | you're actually curious. | simonh wrote: | There are many, many different viruses that cause 'the flu' and | the symptoms can vary quite a bit between varieties. | cmbuck wrote: | Have any of you get tested for antibodies? | grawprog wrote: | I never did, i don't think any of us did. One of us ended up | in close proximity however to someone who'd tested positive | for covid, just prior to getting the results of their tests. | This person did not get sick. | | That may or may not mean something or nothing, it's | impossible to say. It's just an observation and nothing | should be made of it unless that person were to ever be | tested properly for anti-bodies and even then, you still | can't draw any conclusions from it. | | Myself at least, I never got sick through the rest of 2020, | just followed the rules and such and didn't worry much, not | because I thought I already had it, but mostly because | there's no point in worrying about something I can't change. | If I ended up with it after still doing the best I could to | avoid situations that bring me into contact with it, then | there's not much I can do except deal with it if it happened. | | I figured being tested when not showing symptoms and having | been following the rules fairly stringently would | unnecessarily put myself in a situation and environment where | I could be exposed for no real reason. | at_a_remove wrote: | I wish I had it on hand, but I have seen it more than once, | including not long after it came out: in October 2019, one of the | 4chan folks, one of the lab geeks, posted that they had seen a | fairly unusual virus come trucking through in the SARS family. I | saw the screenshot posted again around December. | | I would not be even a little shocked if it were kicking around in | early 2019, or even before. Just think of how HIV was skulking | about, smoldering, before really catching on the tinder. | gpcr1949 wrote: | here's the archived 4chan post [0]. The op is sort of | ridiculous and not relevant, but the poster with id pUlkHE7L | post some PCR stuff which is very strange to post at that date | (21 october 2019 if the timestamps are correct). However, SARS- | CoV-2 is 30kb not 35kb. | | [0] https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/230585890/ | mattzito wrote: | Myself and a few friends all got really sick in late february, | early March - in my case it was when they were only giving covid | tests to people who were hospitalized, so there was nothing to do | but hunker down and wait. | | We all assumed it was covid, but once antibody tests became | widely available, we all went and got them - and none of us had | antibodies. I actually got like three different antibody tests | over the span of two months because I couldn't believe I hadn't | had covid. All negative. | | So maybe we just all caught a bad flu bug? It was pretty | upsetting, tbh, that we all were like, "Well, that stunk, but at | least we know we're immune now", only to discover that no indeed | we were not. | p_j_w wrote: | There are plentiful anecdotes (including this very comment | section) of people with similar stories just assuming they had | caught covid early. Yours is the only one I've seen where the | people involved took a rational/science minded approach and | bothered to get tested for antibodies. Your story should be | viewed as a teaching moment about making assumptions for | others. | | >So maybe we just all caught a bad flu bug? | | I think we in the general public have a tendency to | underestimate just how bad the flu is. Tens of thousands of | people die from it every year in the US alone. This in spite of | easy access to vaccines. It's nothing to mess around with. | Fomite wrote: | This. A perennial annoyance among infectious disease | epidemiologists is how not seriously people take influenza. | As noted, it kills tens of thousands of people a year, and | both times I've gotten it, I've felt like I got hit by a bus. | bsder wrote: | > I think we in the general public have a tendency to | underestimate just how bad the flu is. | | Holy hell this. | | I wanted to punch people who were saying "Covid is just like | a bad flu." | | I've had bad flus. "I would kill myself but I can't get out | of bed to do it" is something that goes through your mind. | | Anyone who dismisses something as "just a bad flu" should get | infected with flu for the next 10 flu seasons. That would | teach them. | jeherr wrote: | I had a coworker who got really sick around the same time. He | had the PCR test done and it came back negative. There was | definitely a bad flu going around at the same time as covid was | popping up in the US. | Applejinx wrote: | I could see that. I got absolutely wrecked around the end of | February, in part because I got badly chilled one night and | allowed it to persist (not wanting to go make a fire in the | woodstove when it was already nighttime). I ran a high fever | for days and was totally wiped out, and have always wondered | if it was COVID. | | Ended up just getting vaccinated, now I'll never know. For | what it's worth, the second Moderna dose clobbered me like it | was supposed to, so maybe it was busy making antibodies and I | didn't actually get any immunity from February 2020... | fl0wenol wrote: | Same happened to me, was in public a lot that February, got a | terrible flu that laid me up. Got tested twice (two different | antibodies tests) a few months later and both negative. | | Just a bad coincidence but I suppose I could count myself | lucky. | dahfizz wrote: | Its interesting to me how so many people got a flu during flu | season but they all are convinced they had covid. Good for you | for at least getting an antibody test. | jp42 wrote: | Exactly same experience for me. precisely in late feb, early | march. I could have written this comment without change a word. | npunt wrote: | This was my experience as well. In SF and got symptoms mid Feb, | doctor visit two weeks later concluded pneumonia and gave me | antibiotics, no covid tests available, took 2+ months to | recover. Later got Abbott Architect antibody test and it was | negative, but I'm skeptical of the result. | tomrod wrote: | What is Abbott's false negative rate again? Im remembering | initially it was sort of high, but I don't recall offhand. | lioeters wrote: | > Dr. Francis Collins, director for the National Institutes | of Health (NIH), said the Abbott ID Now machine, which is | used to perform rapid coronavirus tests, has "about a 15% | false negative rate." | | https://edition.cnn.com/us/live-news/us-coronavirus- | update-0... (May 2020) | | EDIT: The above is just one of the search results I found. | There may be more recent (and more accurate) data. | kderbyma wrote: | why is all this 'new information' the same information that was | around last year?....like it's all about a year old.....I was | reading articles about this last year in June... | feral wrote: | So many people, even here, read the article and are like "I knew | I had covid that December, I had the weirdest cold". | | But actually this should make you suspicious of such anecdotes. | | There's just much too many of them for them all to be covid. | | So they really count as evidence that people just get weird colds | and flus. | | And hence that the weird cold you had in November 2019 was just a | weird non-covid cold. | lambda wrote: | Yeah. My problem is that my "really bad cold that lingered" was | in February 2020. | | That is late enough in the timeline, and the testing at that | time was so insufficient, that it's really hard to say. | | I don't recall losing my sense of smell, but I have been | struggling more with concentration issues and depression since | then. Of course, that could also be due to all the stress over | losing a friend to COVID, the lockdown, the political situation | in the US, etc. | | The biggest disappointment for me in the whole COVID response | has been the complete failure of ramping up COVID testing and | doing random testing or testing of those who hadn't traveled to | China. | bigpumpkin wrote: | The CDC's Dr. Thornburg and Josh Denny, chief executive of the | NIH's All of Us program and an author of the latest study, both | said they don't plan to search blood samples earlier than | December 2019, given how few they have found back then. "We've | seen a very low rate of positivity in this time period," [1] | | [1]https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-virus-ranged-from- | illi... | | Why not sample earlier blood and see how far back COVID | originated. | xienze wrote: | > Why not sample earlier blood and see how far back COVID | originated. | | Because if people found out that Covid had been spreading in | the US for months before the "official" starting date of | March 2020, they'd come to realize that they would have never | even realized there was a pandemic going on were it not for | the media attention. | throwawayboise wrote: | I was pretty sure I had COVID in November '20. Everyone else in | my household had it, and we didn't isolate from each other | really stringently. I had a mild sore throat for a couple of | days. Never got tested because I was "quarantined" anyway for | the close contacts. | | Finally I went and got a COVID antibody test to satisfy my | curiosity, which was negative on all factors. | | I have been supplementing vitamin D and zinc since March '20, | but I'm not sure that would have prevented antibody formation | if I was infected. Seems to me it would not, but that's not | based on any really informed judgment. | driverdan wrote: | > I have been supplementing vitamin D and zinc since March | '20, but I'm not sure that would have prevented antibody | formation if I was infected. | | First, there's no scientific basis for doing so. Unless your | diet is deficient of zinc or you're spending months in an | overcast winter environment neither is going to do anything | for you. They certainly won't have any impact on antibody | formation. | dhzizns wrote: | " there's no scientific basis" | | Theres no scientific basis for anything until a proper | study is done. Doesn't mean it isn't true. And consider | that estimates are as high as 50% of scientific papers' | results are false (especially in bio). | | N.B.1: I'm a scientist in a government lab | | N.B. 2: I'm not impugning science, just fellow scientists. | passivate wrote: | > And consider that estimates are as high as 50% of | scientific papers' results are false (especially in bio). | | Source? | teknopaul wrote: | I have seen scientific evidence that Vit D supplimenting | helps. In Spain its prescribed if you get covid. re: | "unless you are deficient": you supliment to ensure you | arent deficient, you are foolish to risk zinc or Vit D | deficiency if you know you have covid. If you plan a fews | days in bed you are (usually) not going to get much sun. | It's foolish to risk deficiency of any vitamin while ill. | andruby wrote: | 42% of the US population has a vitamin D deficiency [0]. In | the HN population, that number might even be higher | (extrapolating my experience with tech workers and the | hours they spend outside). | | I would encourage most people here to have their Vitamin D | levels checked and take supplements, especially in the | winter months. | | [0] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21310306/ | faeyanpiraat wrote: | Most doctors I've met agreed with this. | | Also certain diets could have other deficiencies, like in | my case I almost never eat fish so I add omega3 (DHA). | astrange wrote: | > First, there's no scientific basis for doing so. | | "No scientific basis" doesn't necessarily mean "false", | otherwise you create a world where everything not mandatory | is forbidden. Many doctors do exist in this world; they're | always totally confident even when they're wrong, and they | will tell you to not do things unless it's the specific | thing they want you to do. | nradov wrote: | There is some limited _in vitro_ evidence for zinc as a | treatment. | | https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/ | j... | | The evidence for vitamin D is much stronger including | multiple randomized controlled trials. | | https://vitamin-d-covid.shotwell.ca/ | asdff wrote: | People still have antibodies from 2003 SARS infections, I | don't think you've had COVID. | the-rc wrote: | I was in a study. My IgG titer went up to 960, when I gave | plasma twice, then 7-8 months after the infection it was | below the 80 threshold to be considered positive. The weird | thing was that six months in, I got tested for IgM and I | was positive for that as well, which might been a sign of a | second exposure. I know others in the same study who were | negative a few weeks after being positive. So it might | depend on the person and the test. | abfan1127 wrote: | antibody tests are really hard. his could be a false | negative. further, he could have had it, but without | antibodies. or he might have had something else. | passivate wrote: | >antibody tests are really hard. | | Are you referring to the quantitative side? You can | simply buy the antibody standard and sVNT test kit from | Genscript. You can get a 96 test kit for under $3k. We | have it and it works quite well. | abfan1127 wrote: | the general concept of antibody tests. Antibodies have | serious dilution. Detection is a challenging problem. | Many antibody tests (ex. measles) has a pretty high (in | my unqualified opinion) false negative rate. Its a tough | problem to solve in general. | | a single paper discussing false reports - | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14574997/ | renewiltord wrote: | If he didn't have antibodies then how did he ever | recover? Surely the thing doesn't just burn itself out. | Without anything to fight it, won't it just continually | infect him? | abfan1127 wrote: | some people are recovering through other responses, | including t-cell response, etc. I don't have the academic | experience, the clinic experience, or his specific | medical history, so I can't speak specifically. I do | recall lots of papers at the beginning of Covid talking | about high t-cell responses in patients without a | lingering anti-body response. That all could have been | early science based on poor data as well though. | peter422 wrote: | Based on the information provided it seems highly | unlikely the OP had covid. | | It isn't impossible but the lack of antibodies is just | one further data point. Most people who recover have | positive antibody tests. | nradov wrote: | There are two basic immune systems: innate and adaptive. | In some cases the innate immune system clears the | infection before the adaptive immune system produces | detectible levels of antibodies. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innate_immune_system?wprov= | sfl... | simonh wrote: | I think it's unlikely that's it for someone seriously ill | for an extended period. | renewiltord wrote: | Sorry, I'm aware of that in general. I was wondering in | this case. I suppose that's possible for people who don't | fall sick (I assume that's why low viral load means you | can get exposed and not get sick?) but OP was quite sick. | nradov wrote: | The antibody tests do occasionally come up negative for | patients who had confirmed infections. You might want to get | the Adaptive Biotechnologies T-Detect COVID test which assays | memory T cells. | | https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press- | announcements/coronavi... | ssully wrote: | I just think most people haven't actually had a bad case of the | flu or a respiratory illness before. So people who did around | November/December assume it must have been covid, when they | most likely just caught something that people usually catch | around that time of year. | wearywanderer wrote: | I find that very hard to believe. Who can honestly say they | were never wrecked by a bad flu and coughed up a lung for a | week or two? Certainly I have been, and everybody in my | family has been, and I've certainly seen friends and | coworkers sick as hell before too. Most people know what it | feels like to be very ill. | | If anything, the fevers, coughs and congestion caused by | covid 19 are fairly mild, even though covid is quite lethal. | That's why you have people who are dying of covid but think | they aren't very sick, or even think the virus isn't real at | all. | didibus wrote: | It took 31 years before I ever caught the real flu | (influenza), and not just a cold or stomach flu. And most | people in my family or my friends have never had it. | lottin wrote: | Colds are pretty common, influenza not that much. In my 39 | years of age I typically catch a cold almost every year, | but the flu only once in my entire life. | Scoundreller wrote: | Flu is kinda like COVID: a significant percentage of | infections are without symptoms. | | Lots of estimates, I usually see it as around one-third | of cases having no symptoms: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646474/ | | I'll take a slight leap and guesstimate this means a lot | of flu infections are around the symptom level of a mild | or bad cold as well. | | When you know you have the flu, it's probably the flu, | but it's much harder to self-determine that you don't | have the flu. | wearywanderer wrote: | Influenza is rare? Maybe rare _for you_ if you habitually | get the flu shot twice a year, but even then the efficacy | of the flu shot can be as low as 50%. Influenza is very | common, most people have experienced it. | hilbertseries wrote: | > That's why you have people who are dying of covid but | think they aren't very sick, or even think the virus isn't | real at all. | | Yeah, this is 100 percent not the reason people think covid | isn't real. | wearywanderer wrote: | There are a myriad of reasons why people think covid | isn't real. But for the segment of that population who | think it isn't real _when they are dying of it_ , the | _perceived_ severity of their experienced symptoms is a | big part of it. | dhzizns wrote: | Im in my late 30s and I have never had the flu. Ive had | multiple terrible colds, but no flu. | | The flus not hard to avoid, and might have gone extinct | with the lockdowns | | EDIT: i dont take the flu vaccine | wearywanderer wrote: | > _[Influenza] might have gone extinct with the | lockdowns_ | | I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. | Johnny555 wrote: | _Ive had multiple terrible colds, but no flu._ | | How do you tell the difference between a terrible cold | and flu? Doctors can't tell the difference from symptoms | alone, do you have yourself tested each time you have a | cold? | | _might have gone extinct with the lockdowns_ | | That's not likely, and with fewer people exposed to the | flu and gaining natural immunity, there may even be a big | spike in flu cases if social distancing and mask wearing | are relaxed next flu season. | didibus wrote: | I guess that's a good point, but I think of the flu as | different symptoms, you are really fatigued, you have | brain fog, feel a bit like you are at the brink of death, | have headaches, and you're caughing, maybe with a sore | throat and more difficulty breathing. | | Whereas colds are more congestion with drowsiness. | | But you're totally right, symptoms alone are hard to use | for accurately knowing what you had, there are so many | types of cold virus and bacteria out there too. | | I guess for me, I had never had the symptoms I describe | in the former, until a few years ago I did, which I | thought of as getting the flu. Had it been early 2020, I | might have wondered if it was Covid, given the | description of symptoms. | Scoundreller wrote: | > might have gone extinct with the lockdowns | | This is unlikely as humans aren't the only hosts for | influenza. Almost all can infect birds and most can | infect pigs. Probably some other humans too. And jump | between eachother and humans. | | We might have the same issue with COVID: vaccinating all | humans may not eradicate it if some animals serve as | natural reservoirs (mink maybe? Ferrets?). | 11thEarlOfMar wrote: | A colleague and his wife became 'sicker than we've ever been' | in late December, 2019, within a week of him transiting in the | business lounge in Vancouver airport, on his way to San Jose. | He notes that a passenger flight from Wuhan landed in Vancouver | at the same time and transit passengers from that flight | enjoyed the same buffet. | | His wife was still suffering side effects months later. Their | grade school aged son had a fever for a couple of days. | lamontcg wrote: | "Sicker than you've ever been" isn't a medical diagnosis. | | I got absolutely royally fucked up by influenza and "sicker | than I've ever been in my adult life" -- and I'm 49 -- but it | was Jan 2019 not Dec 2019, so I'm pretty certain it wasn't | COVID. | | Probably 5% of the population every winter gets "sicker than | they've ever been in their adult life" with some horrible | influenza/bronchitis/pneumonia. | | If everyone who got "sicker than they've ever been" in Dec | 2019 were actually sick with COVID then January would have | decimated long term care facilities around the United States. | Instead you can't see any upward trend in excess mortality in | Jan. If anything Jan and Feb were slightly low and the trend | doesn't become apparent until late March. | myfavoritedog wrote: | Right, if those cases were COVID, why wasn't there a mass | outbreak at that time in their area, causing a surge in | hospitalizations? | | When asked, most of the people I've talked to couldn't even | point to other people to whom they spread their mystery | illness. If it was COVID, it would have been far more | contagious and they likely would have hospitalized some of | their elderly relatives with it. | el_benhameen wrote: | While I agree with the general point you and the op are | making, I don't think your specific assertion is correct. | Covid attack rates have exhibited significant overdispersion; | some people infect large numbers of other people, but most | infect one or no other people. Given this, the fact that the | people with these anecdotes didn't infect anyone they know of | is not evidence that they did not have covid (though again, I | do think you're correct that they didn't have it). | mariodiana wrote: | Doesn't the virus spread, primarily, first through so-called | super-spreader venues/events and then within households? If I | read the article correctly, this was 9 individuals out of 24 | thousand. It's plausible that there would be no mass | outbreak. | Izkata wrote: | Yeah, I remember an article a month or so ago that | mentioned SARS-CoV-2 has a higher "clustering" rating than | common cold/flu, which meant a smaller number of people | caused more spreading, and that there wouldn't be a | noticeable outbreak until the virus reached one of these | superspreaders. | simonh wrote: | This is why Italy got absolutely hammered quite early on. | They were very unlucky to get hit by the mother of all | super spreader events. | | Meanwhile it looks like some other countries like France | had a few cases before then, but it died out. | manwe150 wrote: | I think we more specifically know something emerged that was | much more deadly and contagious around January/February. That | does not completely eliminate the possibility that an earlier | variant was present, which might be cross-reactive and might | provide antibodies for some. We've seen that happen multiple | times since then. Knowing if a lab leak was likely could help | clarify this perhaps, since those may be opposing origin | stories. | Izkata wrote: | > I think we more specifically know something emerged that | was much more deadly and contagious around | January/February. | | This is from late last year, an article that attempted to | group the mutations into "L", "G", "S", "O", etc, strains: | https://graphics.reuters.com/HEALTH- | CORONAVIRUS/EVOLUTION/yx... | | You can see where it compares infections to proportion of | strain that they only spiked when "L" disappeared and one | or more of the "G" ones became dominant. There's only 7 | countries listed here, but I think I remember a different | article that had more, and the pattern was pretty | consistent. | myfavoritedog wrote: | We should have seen evidence of a variant in the USA by | now, if an earlier one had existed prior to the main | outbreak. | eindiran wrote: | There have been many variants that emerged in the | US[0][1], but none of them have been significantly more | infectious than the original Wuhan variant (until the | Epsilon variants emerged very recently). Most of the ones | that are more infectious than the Wuhan variant got nuked | by even more infectious variants from elsewhere. I think | perhaps the impression that there haven't been any | variants stems from the fact that none of the big | variants of concern have been from the US, which appears | to have just been luck. | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variants_of_SARS-CoV-2 | | [1] | https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/14/health/coronavirus- | varian... | throwawaycities wrote: | First I have to admit I had flu like symptoms in January, but | being it was the first time in years I had been sick I | decided to test for anti-bodies early on. I was negative for | the anti-bodies. | | >why wasn't there a mass outbreak at that time in their area, | causing a surge in hospitalizations? | | This raises a very big question about placebo effect/mass | delusion. Is it possible media reporting of a pandemic for a | new virus which we have no natural immunity for actually had | an effect of negative health outcomes early on? Realistically | the news alone could be responsible for increased stress, | much less the real threat of uncertain near term economic | instability, and excessive stress is devastating to immune | systems (so potentially there could be a lot of data | available regarding certain bio markers like increased | cortisol across large swaths of the populace following the | news leading to worse health outcomes compared to covid cases | before the media reporting). | | But let's say for example where media ( I suppose backed by | statistics) reported outcomes were better in youth than | elderly been altered (even slightly) simply by reporting that | youth had more severe symptoms and negative outcomes whereas | elderly seemed to be relatively unaffected. | renewiltord wrote: | I was at a party during the COVID-19 crisis and felt "sicker | than I've ever been". Got tests after I'd isolated. No | antibodies. God damn it. Imagine getting that sick with a cold | and then it not even giving you immunity to anything | worthwhile. | nradov wrote: | Well you probably now have some level of immunity to that | particular cold virus. So you're much less likely to have | type of cold again. There are dozens of different viruses | that can cause common cold symptoms. | nend wrote: | There's a lot of confirmation bias in this thread for sure. | | I thought I had COVID around February/March 2020. Roughly a | year ago antibody tests became readily available, so I got one, | and it came back negative. There was a strain of the flu going | around during the winter of 2019-2020 that was not protected | against by the flu vaccine, that I suspect is contributing to a | lot of the confirmation bias (and I'm guessing is what I had at | the time). | | I'm honestly surprised there's so many people in this thread | who think they had COVID but never got the antibody test. | They're cheap and quick, and if you could have confirmed you | had COVID antibodies, at least for me that would have been a | huge stress reliever during the last 12-18 months of pandemic | lockdowns. | throwkeep wrote: | It would be interesting to see how many of those who thought | they had it prior to Feb/March 2020 ended up getting Covid | later, as it would mostly rule those anecdotes out. | EamonnMR wrote: | It's kinda too late now though, since most of those people | are vaccinated now so they'll have antibodies already, right? | majormajor wrote: | My understanding is that the vaccine will create antibodies | for the spike protein (since that's been the thing the | vaccines reproduce to train the immune system on) but not | the nucleocapsid protein. https://www.technologynetworks.co | m/diagnostics/blog/covid-19... | majormajor wrote: | I was one of those "I got something weird in late Feb 2020, | maybe it was an early Covid case!" people, so I got an | antibody test in April or May of last year, when they became | easy to get. Nothing - so yeah, must've just been a weird | cold of some sort. It was strange since it didn't have the | runny nose or head congestion, but was predominantly | breathing/cough related. | TheOtherHobbes wrote: | There was definitely _something_ going around late 2019 | /early 2020. I had it, and so did many people I know. | | But it's very unlikely it was Covid, because Covid is much | more infectious _and_ more deadly than both colds and flu. | | People weren't masking or taking any precautions then, so | Covid would have spread very quickly indeed. And that would | have created an obvious medical emergency, with hospitals | at full capacity and a clear peak in unexpected deaths. | | Relatively minor symptoms, no huge increase in | hospitalisations, and no huge peak in deaths all suggest | Covid wasn't the culprit. | derivagral wrote: | As someone who returned from Shanghai in mid-November with a | light cough that worsened into a diagnosed "upper-respiratory | viral infection" for ~3 weeks of misery on the couch... I wish | I could confirm one way or the other! | lamontcg wrote: | You almost certainly didn't have it. | | In mid-November there could have only been cryptic spread | around Wuhan. That means that maybe at the outside 3,000 | people around Wuhan had the virus at that point (which I'm | likely being generous with that number). Your chances of | having contracted it in Shanghai is low. 3,000 people sounds | like a lot but China has a population of 1.4 billion people. | Your odds are 1-in-500,000 -- and they're much lower given | the geographical separation from Wuhan to Shanghai. | | You had a cold which developed into bronchitis. | | Now if you told me it was mid-January and that you lost your | sense of smell so completely that you couldn't smell food | burning on the stove and when it came back meat taste rancid, | I'd agree you probably had it. | didibus wrote: | I think you can take an antibody test, if you had Covid (and | assuming you didn't get the Covid vaccine or real Covid | later), you should show signs of antibodies. | mardifoufs wrote: | Yes but even assuming he tests positive for antibodies , it | is way more likely that it would be due to a more recent | but completely asymptomatic infection rather than due to a | very very early infection when the only few cases we know | weren't even in the same region. | throwaway4good wrote: | From the linked article: "Of the 24,079 study participants with | blood specimens from January 2 to March 18, 2020, 9 were | seropositive, 7 of whom were seropositive prior to the first | confirmed case in the states of Illinois, Massachusetts, | Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Mississippi." | | So 9 out of 24,079. Assuming the blood sampling is representative | (which it is likely not) and just multiplying up to all 330 mio | Americans. It would mean that 123,000 Americans would have had or | had the virus at that point. | | That sounds like a lot. (And it also sounds it would have been | spreading for a while.) | curiousllama wrote: | > Assuming the blood sampling is representative (which it is | likely not) | | That assumption is, uhm, doing a lot of work there | infamouscow wrote: | > Assuming the blood sampling is representative (which it is | likely not) | | I can't think of anything more anti-science than dismissing | data. | korethr wrote: | I don't think the phrase you quote is intended as a dismissal | of the data. It comes across as an acknowledgement of the | data's limitations, and a caution about what kind of | conclusions can be drawn. During my statistics course in | college, one of the first sections of the course covered | sampling, and the various ways sampling can be done badly, | thereby biasing the sample, and thereby leading to | conclusions about the sampled population that don't reflect | the reality of that population. | | Cautioning against that failure mode strikes me as | intellectually honest, not anti-science. | abfan1127 wrote: | how is he dismissing data? questionable data should be | treated as such... why would a linear extrapolation be a good | fit here? | rzimmerman wrote: | I think they are implying that blood sampling is not a random | sample of people (more likely to be from someone who is | sick), not that it is inaccurate. | Fomite wrote: | Having worked with banked blood sample data before for | influenza research, it's very, very much not representative. | sct202 wrote: | The PDF is at https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance- | article/doi/10.1093/cid... : | | Some details of the positive test collection dates by state: | *Illinois Jan 7, Jan 20, Jan 22, Feb 21, Feb 24 | *Massachusetts Jan 8 *Wisconsin Feb 3 | *Pennsylvania Feb 15 *Mississippi Mar 6 | | 5 were Black, 2 were Latino/Hispanic, 2 were White | | Page 20 shows that there was a lot of unbalance for the states | with samples. Texas for example only had 84 samples processed, | but Illinois had 2,426. | teknopaul wrote: | re:Black, Latino/Hispanic, White. Only in the US is speaking | Spanish considered a race. I had to ask if I was Hispanic. I | speak Spanish, live in Spain but I was told told its just the | official racist term for Mexicans. N. B. there is no reason for | them to even ask if you are or are not. And no, I could not | chose to be Hispanic: its a term assigned to you. Some Spanish | nationals are Hispanic some are not. Some Mexicans are not | Hispanic. It does not matter where you were born or the colour | of your skin. Its _official_ racism, they decide if you are or | are not Hispanic and if they decide you are and you thought you | were not, or vice versa, you can be banned from entry into the | US forever for "lying" on the visa form. | | That is institutional racism taken to the doublethink level. | williesleg wrote: | Fake news from the fakers. | HarryHirsch wrote: | The crucial bit of information is omitted - were these cases | locally acquired or were they imported? Did the NIH follow up on | that? | 99_00 wrote: | The real timeline is most certainly earlier than the official | one. | | https://twitter.com/jenniferatntd/status/1228435515776667649 | WiSaGaN wrote: | It was already reported in Chinese national TV on Dec 31, 2019 | there was pneumonia with unclear reason: | http://app.cctv.com/special/cportal/detail/arti/index.html?i... | felipellrocha wrote: | My mother-in-law got a weird cold at around October where she | lost her sense of smell for a few days. | passivate wrote: | So did my brother in Jan 2021. Turns out it was sinus related | :) | myfavoritedog wrote: | I'm really skeptical of the "I had a bad cough in late 2019, must | have been COVID claims". I saw quite a number of them on social | media last year. It seemed like people were eager to grab some | sort of celebrity or a part of a conspiracy. Some of the people | got really angry with me when I confronted their claims with | skepticism. It's like they felt personally insulted. | | The truth is, people get upper respiratory illnesses quite often. | I had a nasty upper respiratory illness in late 2016 after a trip | to London. I was miserable for weeks. If it had been late 2019, I | could have joined in on the chorus of people claiming to have had | something that "surely might have been COVID". | guilhas wrote: | Last November/December was for me the strangest flu season | ever, coughing and sneezing for abnormally long period, my | coworkers and mother also. And after, in January, I got a | really strange what looked like herpes in the face. Followed by | finger infection which I had never had, which could mean my | immune system was abnormally weak | | So that's that | asdff wrote: | Thats another variable here. People get older and are more | weak over time. Diseases hit you worse in your 30s than in | your 20s. Health conditions also tend to crop up after a | certain age, like heart conditions that you might blame on a | vaccine instead of just you getting older and being | predisposed to this condition. | giarc wrote: | I agree with your comment. When I look at various respiratory | viral dashboards for North America, we had a pretty typical | year in 2019-2020. Therefore all these people likely just had | some viral infection (flu, enterovirus, rhinovirus etc). | | The crazy part is how much that has changed now though. Now if | they said they had a bad cold in 2020-2021 flu season (and | weren't tested), it is almost 100% chance to be COVID. Almost | every other resp virus has disappeared. | wolverine876 wrote: | I have a weird itch on my a-- right now. It is the next | pandemic. | deadite wrote: | April last year, when this whole thing hit, we had people under | throwaway accounts including myself speaking about this on HN, | and as expected we hit a roadblock because anecdotes aren't data | and whatever, so we were downvoted, called conspiracy theorists | and other nonsense. There's ultimately nothing for any of us to | gain in lying that we've been asked, by our doctors, going back | to October of 2019, whether or not we've been to Wuhan (asked | specifically and point blank). | | There's a lot more that we know than we are willing to share | because HN just isn't a good platform for this sort of discussion | anymore. It's too politicized and too many bruised, sensitive | egos that can't handle contrary thinking. So for the rest of you, | you'll have to get used to constantly having to shift and re- | evaluate what you think you "know" and how you feel about a | certain thing today, and the kind of statements and comments | you've made in the past based on events that you think did or did | not happen (because you've been told, and you believe what you're | being told by the big media) when, in fact, it may turn out that | the "truth" was factually incorrect or hidden from you to begin | with. | | Take it however you may, just please don't shoot the messenger. | tolbish wrote: | Here is an example of a thread where we all knew for a fact | that the virus could not have spread as early as it did: | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23459963 | deadite wrote: | Reminds me of this, which is a comically recurring thing on | HN: | | https://slashdot.org/story/01/10/23/1816257/apple- | releases-i... | seoaeu wrote: | Wait, what evidence is there that the virus was spreading in | August 2019? From a quick Google search, this source [0] | published not long ago claims they think earliest it could | possibly have been was mid-October of 2019. | | [0]: https://health.ucsd.edu/news/releases/Pages/2021-03-18-n | ovel... | tolbish wrote: | It spread in the fall of 2019, which is late September, | October, November, and December. That would put it in line | with spreading in the US in December. | javagram wrote: | Hey, that's my post :-D I think it still holds up. The virus | being "present" in the US in December isn't the same as being | spread widely. | | This new NIH survey still offers no reason to doubt the | timeline that the virus emerged around October 2019 in Wuhan | and only became a serious threat in late November/December, | when hospitalizations began to rise and some doctors started | warning of a SARS re-emergence. A widespread COVID-19 | epidemic in Wuhan during August 2019 continues to seem | unlikely to me. | Gibbon1 wrote: | What I remember was people arguing that it was present | earlier where also making the argument that infection was | widespread. And thus the case fatality ratio was 100 times | lower than the 0.7% the Chinese were reporting. | qmmmur wrote: | You sound kind of bruised with a big ego? | nenaan wrote: | Nytimes had articles on it in late dec 2019, and january 2020. | April 2020 is months past my states emergency orders. | deadite wrote: | I agree. But people seemed to not be able to entertain the | thought that doctors were aware something was happening back | in October. In their minds, I think, if the big media did not | have an article on it, then it doesn't exist. This is a | grievous state of affairs for discussions, because it means | NYT and others are effectively the Ministry of Truth for HN. | elorant wrote: | Dude, it's one thing sharing your experience, and a whole | different to assume that doctors knew and are hiding | something. Just because there were scattered cases here and | there doesn't mean that the medical community could | correlate them all and understand what they were dealing | with. | guscost wrote: | Same with anyone who was saying "it's airborne" or "the case | fatality rate is inflated" or "it could have leaked from that | lab". | | And now, behold as the intellectual class attempts to delete | these mistakes from our collective memory. | whydoibother wrote: | Case fatality rate wasn't inflated, it was deflated if | anything. | | And there is still no real evidence of a lab leak, despite | western intelligence continually lying about it. | avs733 wrote: | no one is deleteing anything...they are simply learning, as | science does, and noting that prior knowledge was incorrect. | | That is fundamentally different from people screaming without | evidence. A broken clock is right twice a day, but it is not | an accurate clock at any point. | guscost wrote: | It was a bit tongue-in-cheek, and note the word "attempts". | This one is much too big/high profile to delete, | thankfully. | | The "this is just how to do science" defense is cute, but a | lot people died and will die over it, and in general the | conduct we have seen from formerly-trusted authorities is | inexcusable. Most people are not going to let that gang of | narrow-minded bullies "do science" to them ever again. | avs733 wrote: | a gang of narrow minded bullies? | | This is what we are calling the field that ended polio | and smallpox. | vadansky wrote: | I'm sorry no, this is not "they are simply learning, as | science does" | | People were against this emotionally since Trump suggested | it first and no one wanted to be seen agreeing with him on | something, even though a broken clock can be right twice a | day | avs733 wrote: | I would argue, philosophically, the broken clock isn't | right twice a day. That clock is simply saying the same | thing as people who are right. It's claim about what time | it is has no credibility. | | I have a friend who's Toddler knows that things have | colors but only knows one color - Blue. If the child | calls everything Blue it isn't showing understanding of | the concept, even if the kid responds 'Blue' when asked | what color the sky is. To claim that is 'right' is | projecting my beliefs and knowledge onto the childs. | guscost wrote: | In my opinion you are completely right, but calling this | out makes a lot of people very mad. | avs733 wrote: | I'm not mad, I just have been taught that retcon'ing | evidence to fit a narrative is not the same thing as | science. It doesn't matter how well it fits or evidence, | it should be rejected because the base structure of the | argument fails. | | These people aren't 'right' in the sense that they | figured something out, they screamed about something | without evidence. | | Whatever happens next cannot change that fact. Its | notable that what is happening is the evidence is getting | constantly substituted to fit an explanation not the | explanation emerging from the available evidence. | | It's the boy who cried wolf... | whydoibother wrote: | Stop trying to tie it to your politics. Some people want | real evidence before they scream about things like you | do. It had little to do with Trump. | vadansky wrote: | Wrong because the alternative had no real evidence | either. | throwawaysea wrote: | It absolutely had everything to do with Trump. He was | slated to be the clear winner until two events (COVID-19 | and George Floyd) presented political opportunities. In | an election year, everything becomes about the election. | People wanted to attack Trump at every turn, even when he | suggested reasonable measures like controlling travel, | and equally they wanted to ensure all blame was directed | at Trump rather than the Chinese government or state | governments or elsewhere. | | To address your claim more directly, there was never any | justification to dismiss the lab leak theory, or claim it | was debunked (as many news outlets did), or censor | conversations about it online. This isn't about believing | it is the only possibility, but that it is a likely | possibility that deserves serious attention. The reason | it was instead cloaked in dogmatic terms like "conspiracy | theory" and shutdown outright, is purely because of | politics. There was no "real evidence" to dismiss it as | it was. And guess what - that dismissal also allowed the | Chinese government to avoid a site visit for months, and | even when the WHO visit happened, it was under the terms | of the Chinese government with an untrustworthy outcome. | Those who shutdown the lab leak theory and other such | claims aren't interested in evidence. They're interested | in political opportunism. | whydoibother wrote: | > there was never any justification to dismiss the lab | leak theory | | that isn't how this works. extraordinary claims require | extraordinary evidence. there is zero evidence of a lab | leak besides circumstantial. | | > censor conversations about it online | | they did a poor job of that then, considering all the | very vocal people I had to hear keep talking about it for | the last year. | | >He was slated to be the clear winner until two events | (COVID-19 and George Floyd) | | weird how that works, huh? when you handle crises poorly | -- or downright negligently -- people will hate you and | not vote for you. strange. | throwawaysea wrote: | > extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. | there is zero evidence of a lab leak besides | circumstantial. | | The claim is not exactly extraordinary - you have a lab | with a history of poor controls, performing gain of | function research relating to SARS-like viruses, knowing | that SARS (the first one) had broken out of labs multiple | times. That's not hard evidence, but it is a strong set | of priors that makes the lab leak theory an obvious | candidate for an origin story. It shouldn't be surprising | that there isn't hard evidence when the world hasn't been | allowed a timely and transparent investigation. And why | would China allow such an investigation when there's no | pressure to do so, when people are rushing to their | defense to dismiss the valid lab leak theory as a | "conspiracy theory"? Their work was done for them by news | media and tech giants who institutionalized that | dismissive attitude, again motivated by their own | political biases. You can't have evidence until you take | the speculation seriously and perform the necessary | investigation properly, so I'm not sure how you could for | "extraordinary evidence". | | > weird how that works, huh? | | You're ignoring the point I was making, which was that | the people opposed to Trump were _desperate_ for any way | to attack him, given that he was on a clear path to re- | election. Since this was the only crisis at the time that | they could leverage, they did so (and did so viciously). | That included dismissing any scrutiny directed at China, | even though it was valid. | toast0 wrote: | > People were against this emotionally since Trump | suggested it first and no one wanted to be seen agreeing | with him on something, even though a broken clock can be | right twice a day | | Trump wanted to use some inappropriate names for the | disease and wanted to ban travel for people holding PRC | passports. Neither of those things make sense to do from | a disease control standpoint. If you wanted to ban travel | for people who had been in the area of exposure, that | might make sense, but nation of passport isn't the way; | and after not a whole lot of time, the disease had spread | widely enough that there weren't really many places that | should have been whitelisted. | throwawaysea wrote: | We very regularly associate things with their origin. We | did so almost this entire last year when we talked about | variants of COVID-19. And in the early days of COVID-19, | in China, in their airports, the virus was called "Wuhan | virus" on signage. Those names were also used in news | reports regularly. I agree that something like "kung flu" | is inappropriate, but I don't agree that "China virus" or | "Wuhan virus" are inappropriate, and don't think they | were controversial until they were deemed as such for | what seems like political reasons. | | > wanted to ban travel for people holding PRC passports | | Banning by passport makes some sense. We can't prevent US | citizens from returning to their homes. But we can | prevent others from traveling to the US. It might make | sense to ban all passports except the US for flights | originating from China, but then you end up dragging in | connecting flights through China from other countries. In | terms of a quick, easy to implement measure, that will at | least reduce the number of imported cases, banning travel | based on PRC passports seems logical. | | > the disease had spread widely enough that there weren't | really many places that should have been whitelisted | | Surely, given that we do care about just controlling the | numbers even if it is not perfect (like with "flatten the | curve"), it makes some sense to focus on the epicenter. | jcranmer wrote: | > We can't prevent US citizens from returning to their | homes. | | SCOTUS has ruled that the US does have quarantine powers | for medical emergencies, even for its own citizens. Maybe | a complete ban if poorly orchestrated might run afoul of | the Constitution, but a policy like "all travelers [US | citizen or not] from X region must present at <specific | port of entry>, whereupon they will be transferred to a | quarantine facility for 14 days" would totally be fine. | Note, for example, the way that the quarantine on dogs | because of rabies is being handled. | | > But we can prevent others from traveling to the US. It | might make sense to ban all passports except the US for | flights originating from China, but then you end up | dragging in connecting flights through China from other | countries. | | Why should you exempt people whose only presence was via | connecting flights? This generally involves long layovers | inside of airports, where a large enough fraction is | potentially susceptible to already be concerned about | (due to local people making their flights), and you're | likely to be spending a decent period of time on the | plane with such people as well, too. | [deleted] | [deleted] | throwaway4good wrote: | So what do you see if you examine blood samples further back than | January 2020? | aranazo wrote: | They found covid-19 Antibodies in Italian blood samples from | September 2019. | | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33176598/ | | PCR tests on Spanish sewer water found positive samples even | earlier in 2019. I think the earliest so far French case was in | early December 2019. I hope lots more studies are proceeding. | hef19898 wrote: | That aspect gets largely ignored in any discussion regarding | Covids origin. Impossible to follow those really early cases | up, tracing the infection lines I guess. | reureu wrote: | If you're reading this article and live in the US, you should | really consider enrolling in the All of Us research study: | https://www.joinallofus.org | | It's planned to be a 10 year longitudinal cohort study, where | they're regularly collecting samples and measurements to be used | to try to advance things like precision medicine. Your | contribution can help continue doing studies like this and many | many others :) | dyingkneepad wrote: | In early December 2019 my son in the US West got something that | perfectly matches covid: looked like a cold, it got bad and then | he got better, then two days later is got much worse. So we took | him to the hospital and they concluded he had pneumonia, and also | that it was not the flu. We treated the pneumonia and he got | better and we all moved forward. My other son and wife also got | milder cases, while I was mostly fine (but not 100%). There's no | way to say it was actually covid, but it certainly was not the | Flu due to the exam, and it matches all the covid symptoms. We'll | never know, unless somehow they find the stuff collected by the | hospital and analyze it again. | macksd wrote: | I've heard quite a few stories like this, and anecdata though | it may be, I find it very intriguing. How WOULD we know? There | seems to me to be a pretty consistent timeline: confirmed cases | and rampant spread in other countries, the first confirmed | cases in the US and rampant spread among vulnerable populations | (nursing homes, etc.), and subsequently the overwhelming of | ICUs. Each step seemed to take a few weeks, and progress | consistently. There's a lot of suspicion from some that things | were misreported, and some of that is the typical lies-with- | statistics, etc. but I know enough people who were working in | nursing homes and in ICUs that I personally trust the general | timeline to be reality. | | So what's up with these early possible cases? I wonder how | plausible it is that it there was some early spread of the same | disease, but vulnerable populations were just luckily avoiding | exposure. It really seemed to take off in the US in those | nursing homes. IIRC that's what happened in Seattle, and that's | what happened in my county. THAT'S what wiped out most of our | body count, and that's what initially overwhelmed ICUs. And | that's what raised a lot of awareness, and probably a few self- | diagnosed false positives too. Could genuine COVID cases have | been going around before then and just not getting the | attention, or causing as much damage until that point? | p_j_w wrote: | >How WOULD we know? | | Antibody tests after the fact would reveal whether or not | these were Covid cases. You'd have to be tested before the | antibodies disappeared, though. | jsnell wrote: | No. We have plenty of ways of detecting a large scale Covid | epidemic after the fact, even if it ended up somehow avoiding | all people from the risk groups. Analysis of historical blood | samples for antibodies. Early population-wide antibody tests. | Phylogenetic analysis. Wastewater analysis. | | Think of just how contagious Covid would have been before we | knew about it and started taking precautions. You could only | introduce Covid into a country a few times before it'd | inevitably start a self-sustaining transmission chain. We | have no credible proof of that happening in the west until | 2020. | ds206 wrote: | Isn't that what the study is suggesting though? They are | looking back (like you point out) and finding it earlier | than we all thought? | jsnell wrote: | That is the kind of study they did, yes. And the results | are consistent with commonly accepted timeline, not with | the "I had Covid in October 2019 but they covered it up" | crackpots. | | The prevalence they found is extremely low, less than | 0.05%, despite their samples going all the way back to | Mid-March. Since they did not test on any samples that | are definitely pre-Covid (e.g. early 2019, late 2018), we | can't calibrate their false positive rate. But if we | assume the specificity of the tests was 99% which seems | on the high end for antibody tests, and that the false | positives are uncorrelated, we're already in the region | of false positives feasibly explaining literally all of | their samples. | | The data is just totally inconsistent with any kind of | widespread transmission of Covid in the US in 2019. | toast0 wrote: | How many of your detection mechanisms were actually carried | out? | | I think the most useful measure that was actually carried | out were the handful of places that take samples for flu | surveilance that were able to retest the samples for covid. | Of course, in many places, you can't actually convince a | doctor to take a sample for flu-like illness, so there's no | data. | jsnell wrote: | All of them have been done in practice, of course. | Voloskaya wrote: | > There's no way to say it was actually covid, but it certainly | was not the Flu due to the exam, and it matches all the covid | symptoms | | Many things match those symptoms though, such as other strains | of coronaviruses e.g. HKU1 or NL63, which although rare, were | certainly more prevalent in the US in december 2019 thant SARS- | CoV-2 | bluetwo wrote: | You can get antibody tests now to find out. | negativegate wrote: | If you've also been vaccinated is it possible to distinguish | that? | | Edit: I suppose in this case they could test prior samples, | but if you don't have any, you're out of luck? | mattzito wrote: | I know this! It depends on the antibody test - if you can | get a test for the nucleocapsid antibodies, that will | determine whether you had the disease or not. People who | are vaccinated will test positive for the spike protein, | but will not test positive for the nucleocapsid antibodies, | at least with the vaccines currently available (I believe | there are vaccines in development that target both | proteins, but not yet available). | | Some antibody tests target spike or nucleocapsid, some | target both, so you need to check which tests they are | using and verify what it tests against (or ask your doctor | to order a specific test that checks for the nucleocapsid | antibodies). | | I learned this when I was part of a vaccine study and was | curious to know whether I had gotten the vaccine or the | placebo, and was able to use a spike antibody test to | confirm that I was in the vaccine group. | numpad0 wrote: | I wonder if it's theoretically possible to construct a | historical timeline of immunity development for an | individual by taking multiple tests, sounds like a proper | forensics work than something to do just out of curiosity. | baseballdork wrote: | Donate blood with the red cross and they'll test for | antibodies. I had a miserable flu-like illness over Christmas | '19. It's probably the sickest I had ever been in my life. | When the publicity started blowing up over the pandemic, my | dad suggested that maybe I had caught it while I was | traveling for job interviews in the previous weeks and | months. I eventually donated blood in 2020 and sure enough, I | tested false for antibodies. I've donated twice since, and | the first was negative. Waiting to see what the next one says | since I've been vaccinated. | tkahnoski wrote: | Similar experience but late December/early Jan after a flight. | I got a terrible cough and was laid up for a day and my | youngest got Pneumonia and was notably "our-of-breath" for a | few weeks afterwards. | | So I have always wondered, however this occurred during holiday | gatherings and no one else in the group really got it so I've | kind of written it off as some 'other' less contagious virus. | matthewdgreen wrote: | Did you lose your sense of smell or taste? | | I have dozens of friends who report a terrible cold with many | of these symptoms during the Dec19-Jan20 time period. I had | it myself. What's notable about all these anecdotes is that | not a single one of them remembers experiencing the #1 most | distinctive COVID symptom: losing the sense of smell. Of | course, not every COVID sufferer experiences that, but you'd | think if there was an outbreak of real COVID during that time | we'd have heard a lot of reports of it. Take a look at all | the people reporting being sick back then on this HN thread | alone -- nobody leads with the most distinctive COVID | symptom. | dcolkitt wrote: | I think this is a good argument for the government to start a | program to do an ongoing "serological census". | | On an ongoing basis, take random samples from the population and | freeze their nasal swabs, blood samples, skin shavings, etc. If | there's ever a major disease we need to understand the spread of, | this would give us the data before we're even aware of its | existence. | shalmanese wrote: | That feels like a wonderfully efficient way to generate a | continuously fertile crop of new conspiracy theories. | nexuist wrote: | Here's a simple one: do we really trust a government agency | (or hell, anyone really) to collect intimate and identifiable | data about our bodies all while preserving anonymity and | securing the data from nation state attackers? Do we trust | nameless data scientists to run SQL queries over us that | aren't intended to determine which ones of us will be | smarter, stronger, more violent, etc? Do we trust politicians | that have not yet been elected to office to use this data for | benevolent purposes like our current politicians would (if we | trust our current politicians)? | | Maybe there is some benefit to running such a program, but it | would be outweighed by the vulgar distrust that would fester | inside of concerned populations and spread to non- | controversial parts of the government such as the post office | and the voting process. Concerned populations here are not | just conspiracy nuts; it would include undocumented | immigrants, Black and Hispanic minorities, and probably a | good chunk of Jews. | mrfusion wrote: | With consent. Please say with consent. | newsbinator wrote: | I'm surprised they don't already do that? | giarc wrote: | The chance of it producing any result is incredibly low. | Imagine trying to pin point the start of an outbreak when the | US might have had a handful of cases each month, by randomly | sampling people. You'd basically have to sample 100% of the | population every month to catch a rare event like that. | bhickey wrote: | Run pooled testing on blood donations, sewage or airplane | waste water. | passivate wrote: | How do you develop a storage buffer for things you haven't even | encountered? Also, freezing and thawing is an imperfect process | that can damage cells. Sure we might luck out too.. | | But yeah, like the other poster said, the bill-gates- | corona-5G-mind-control-implant folks are going to have a field | day with that :D | aphextron wrote: | I had the worst cough of my entire life in January 2020. A solid | month of being unable to sleep without massive amounts of Nyquil. | Never had any of the other weird symptoms I can remember though, | so I've always written it off since I live in North Carolina and | we didn't have our first recorded cases until February. But in | retrospect it seems almost impossible that it wasn't COVID. | happytoexplain wrote: | I know a healthy adult who was hospitalized with a bafflingly | terrible flu in December 2019. They lost consciousness and it | was not obvious that they were going to make it. They had just | returned from a business trip to China. Still, it could have | just been their body being unable to cope with a foreign strain | of flu, I suppose. | qqqwerty wrote: | Same, but mid December in SF. It hit our office pretty hard. I | am not sure it was COVID, it could have just been a nasty cold | that happened to sweep through right before COVID hit. But the | timing was definitely odd. | dragonwriter wrote: | > But the timing was definitely odd. | | A nasty cold or flu hitting in the middle of cold and flu | season isn't _that_ odd, as timing goes. | | Sure, in 2020 it's a coincidence that naturally raises the | "was it COVID?" question, but not really odd timing if it | wasn't. | qqqwerty wrote: | The timing was odd because of how severe the cough was. I | have had plenty of colds through out my life, and this was | by far the worst. | asdff wrote: | Another variable is that you are also older with a less | robust immune system than when you've had colds in your | youth. This is why anecdotes are always worthless. You | need statistical power to overcome these latent variables | that could be biasing your conclusions. | ssully wrote: | It's possible you had covid, but I think the odds are | stronger that you just had a different respiratory | illness that was going around at the time. | mattlondon wrote: | Yep. There are readily available tests to see if you have | antibodies so I took one (before vaccination) and sure | enough I did not have any antibodies so likely had not had | covid in the past few months prior. | | Seems like everyone and their aunt had a story about how | they "definitely" had it back at the start. Cough, itchy | eye, nose bleed, aching knee etc - you name it...seemed | like at the time lots of people seemed to want to ascribe | _anything_ to definitely having covid. I am not sure why | this was - doesn 't seem like people do this so much now. | qqqwerty wrote: | In this particular case it was the worst cough I had ever | had by a fairly wide margin. This was definitely not a | case of us having the sniffles and thinking we might have | caught covid. | | And for the record, I don't necessarily think it was | COVID. Just confirming the OP's anecdote that there was | definitely something that was going around at that time. | InitialLastName wrote: | I had one of the flu variants (tested positive for flu) | from 2019-20 in December, followed by a really bad cold | (no tests) in Feb, followed by COVID (confirmed by tested | contacts, an antibody test and a fully checked "weird | COVID symptoms" bingo card) in March. | | 2019-20 was definitely a season for nasty colds/flus, not | just COVID. | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote: | > seemed like at the time lots of people seemed to want | to ascribe anything to definitely having covid. I am not | sure why this was - doesn't seem like people do this so | much now. | | I think the reason back then was that getting Covid was | the only way to build immunity. Thus, if you had had | Covid and recovered, you were better off than if you had | not had Covid. | | The big difference now is that we have a vaccine. You can | be protected from Covid by getting the vaccine, without | having to actually get Covid (Yay for vaccines). | jagger27 wrote: | Did anyone from your office later catch covid? If anyone did, | the lack of immunity would suggest it wasn't. | qqqwerty wrote: | Not that I am aware of. | toast0 wrote: | My immediate family (but not me) got something nasty between | Christmas and New Years. Based on timing, we thought maybe | COVID before it was supposed to have arrived, but symptoms | point more towards whooping cough. | | Thankfully, our local medical professionals who saw my child | and my spouse refused to take any sort of sample, so we'll | never know. Also, they said we were fine to go out after the | fever ended, which doesn't seem consistent with actual | spreading of viruses; yay medical profession. | e40 wrote: | Son at UCSD with 4 i18n roommates (3 China, 1 Korea) in Jan | 2020 after all roommates came back to school from winter break. | Diagnosed as bronchitis and was sick for a few weeks. Had heart | palpitations, too, which was the scary part, but in retrospect | that pretty much nails it as covid for me. | faeyanpiraat wrote: | First time I've seen i18n used like this in the wild. | NoOneNew wrote: | Florida here, first week of February 2020, weirdest damn flu | for me. While it didnt get bad enough for me to go to the | hospital, going to bed and waking up, my heart always felt | "weird". Like it would beat hard enough to feel and sometimes | have a weird rhythm. Which is super abnormal whenever I had a | cold or flu in the past. Mild congestion, which I normally | should be leaking like a faucet and i was always cold. Like, | crazy chills, no fevers and no amount of hot shower could solve | the cold feeling. But hey, it was early Feb, no reason to have | thought it was covid. Went away like one and half weeks later. | No one else around me caught it. | eynsham wrote: | Studies like this suggest that there were Covid-19 infections | in the US before they were first detected; they don't suggest | that they were terribly widespread. Unless flu is vastly less | likely to cause these symptoms than Covid, or it turns out that | the difference in prevalence was much smaller than, at least on | current evidence of the trajectory of the pandemic, is | plausible, 'almost impossible' looks to me like it's rather | understating the odds that it was flu/something else instead of | Covid. | stadium wrote: | Same here. I had pneumonia twice, once in October 2019 which | was probably not covid, then again in February 2020 which I am | almost certain was covid. Someone of my age and general health | should not get pneumonia twice so close together without some | serious underlying condition. The rest of my family got very | ill as well. | | I was more tired than I've ever felt, and my mind and legs were | restless throughout the night and I couldn't sleep despite | being exhausted. Called the on-call doc on the worst night | because I thought I was having a reaction to the strong | antibiotics they prescribed, and they had me take benadryl to | help with the restless legs and insomnia, but it made it worse | because I'm one of those people that gets the opposite of the | intended effect of benadryl. I also lost 2 weeks of work with | each case. | | All the while, the Dr. shrugged it off, and there was no way to | get tested for covid without being hospitalized on your death | bed. | comeonseriously wrote: | We had family visit from the PNW Dec 2019. Me and one of them | caught "something". Whatever it was it kicked my butt from the | last week of Dec to then end of Jan. Theirs lasted just about | as long. I had trouble breathing and had a nasty cough. I only | had a low-grade fever (and that was only for a few days at | first), so I never felt like I should go see my Dr. but | probably should have anyway. | stordoff wrote: | I was rather ill at the end of February 2020 (UK). Bad cough, | full body aches, fatigue, high fever yet feeling chilled at the | same time, and I twice woke up and was shaking enough to throw | my phone across the room when I tried to check the time. It | left me with a lingering question of whether I'd had Covid-19, | particularly as it was just after a trip to London, though it | seemed very unlikely given the low number of confirmed cases. | | I _actually_ got Covid-19 (confirmed PCR) in October 2020, and | was significantly more ill (ICU), so it seems to confirm the | first illness was something else. | newsbinator wrote: | I had something similar in 2017 | docderanged wrote: | yo aphex want to talk like a man or do i have to give out the | information about you and how you have child porn on your | computer? i dont want to get you fired and go to your house man | jsut hit me up in my temp email eponuts2022@gmail.com or im | goign to have to let your boss know and show him all the screen | shots | docderanged wrote: | what is your adress in north carolina i want to see you face to | face since your bitch ass wont let me know whats up over the | internet, fuck you alex , im watchign you man you should go to | jail alex ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-06-15 23:00 UTC)