[HN Gopher] A transistorized shift register box, built in 1965 f... ___________________________________________________________________ A transistorized shift register box, built in 1965 for Apollo testing Author : parsecs Score : 64 points Date : 2021-06-16 17:49 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.righto.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.righto.com) | kens wrote: | Author here for all your questions about obscure Apollo hardware | :-) | jetrink wrote: | Do you think that this device was entirely bespoke or do you | think that the designers adapted another design (perhaps a | commercial product)? | kens wrote: | This device seems specific to its particular task. I wonder | about the strange construction technique of pseudo- | integrated-circuits on mini PCBs. It's hard to imagine that | Control Data would come up with that specifically for this | device. If I come across any other CDC systems that use the | same technique, it will be informative. | neuralRiot wrote: | Probably it was done to save down time in the event of a | failure, if something happened you'd just replace the | affected module instead of the whole test box or to match | certain characteristics, you build several modules and use | the ones with similar parameters. | h2odragon wrote: | Correct me if I'm wrong, but they really did need such extreme | measures against humidity etc then, right? The components we have | today are better sealed, the materials are less likely to be | affected by humidity, etc etc. Years of marginal improvements in | epoxies mostly I think. | kens wrote: | One of the testing documents describes the problems they had | with corrosion, so it was a genuine problem. Part of the | solution was more air conditioning, and the other part was | making the units more resistant to humidity. Keep in mind that | they were on the Florida coast, so there was a lot of humidity | and salt. | anonymousisme wrote: | Perhaps this was the inspiration for Boundary Scan (IEEE-1149.1) | also known as JTAG. | lolc wrote: | What strikes me about a unit like that is how it's just a small | part in an undertaking where thousands of similar components had | to be ready and interoperable within the decade. | kens wrote: | Yes, it's like fractal levels of complexity. This box is a | small part of the system to test a small part of a subsystem | that's a small part of the Moon landing, but even this one | piece is complicated, and had pages and pages of | specifications. | jsrcout wrote: | I always think of building a system of this complexity as | building a pyramid where each block is its own entire | pyramid. | kens wrote: | What you're describing is the fractal Sierpinski pyramid | :-) | | Picture: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sierpinski | _pyramid.p... | mulmen wrote: | In my day job I do data pipeline development and operations. That | involves a bunch of AWS services and some custom wrappers we | developed in-house. I spend a lot of time clicking around in web | interfaces. | | Recently I have fantasized about what it would be like to operate | my environment with something like the ACE control room. | | Need to set a flag on some Spark option? That's literally a | switch. Is something on fire? Look for a flashing red light. Need | to send the output of a task to some other process? That's a | knob. | | I think about this both in terms of literally making a control | panel/room or a web interface equivalent. | | A control room seems like something that needs a lot of | forethought and deep understanding. How would that requirement | along with the difficulty of pushing changes influence the design | of a web interface? | | Recently Ken obtained and shared some of the Roto-Tellite | switches from mission control. Is that the 1960's version of | jQuery? | TedDoesntTalk wrote: | You can forget automation then :) | mulmen wrote: | Why? Apollo was automated. The LEM could land itself. The | control room just... controls. | | Why can't my control room have a "backfill" station that | takes inputs for begin and end date and dispatches that to | the correct system? | KineticLensman wrote: | > The LEM could land itself | | No, really it couldn't. Someone had to reset all those 1201 | alarms while manually hovering it down to a boulder free | site | kens wrote: | To be serious, the Apollo testing was a combination of | manual, semi-automatic, and automatic. You could program | tests into the minicomputer and trigger them with a "start" | button in the control room. The computer would carry out the | steps for the test, check for parameters that were out of | bounds, and display these on a CRT in the control room. | Meanwhile, you could see other parameters on the gauges and | chart recorders. So it was more advanced than you might | expect. | | It replaced a system where you'd radio a guy at the rocket | and tell him to switch things on and off, and he'd tell you | what happened. Needless to say, that was pretty unreliable. | anoncake wrote: | No, you need to build a button pushing robot then. | thehappypm wrote: | You'd love Simulink. | stadium wrote: | Investing in centralized logging and alerting can give you the | raw data for your dashboarding vision. I'd start there. | mulmen wrote: | I already have logs, alerts and dashboards. | | I want a _control panel_. Complete with blinkenlights and | switchgear that goes "click" and has satisfying detents. | ksaj wrote: | I believe the current interest in Arduino, Raspberry Pi | Pico, Mini SAM, and the like is because of an interest in | how things worked when they were simpler and more | mechanical. Especially since they allow for easy cross- | breeding of modern computing with something more analog on | a bread board or pHAT with any sensor configuration you can | imagine. | | It sounds like you would find some comfort in and around | these devices. | dsnuh wrote: | I made a little joke project a while back called | "Keytarnetes" which used a MIDI controller (in this case a | keytar from a Guitar Hero set) to run various actions | against a Kubernetes cluster when you pressed the keys. It | was really simple to hack together in a night using the | mido python library. I basically just had a folder with | shell scripts named after the notes and a process that | polled for new keypresses and executed the script with the | same name when that note that was pressed on the keytar. | Maybe something like that could work for you? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-06-16 23:01 UTC)