[HN Gopher] I know the secret to the quiet mind but wish I'd nev...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       I know the secret to the quiet mind but wish I'd never learned it
        
       Author : danso
       Score  : 138 points
       Date   : 2021-06-18 20:31 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theatlantic.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theatlantic.com)
        
       | peter303 wrote:
       | NPR had a story about a neurologist who had a severe stroke and
       | lost ability to speak or hear language for several months. She
       | said her mind went silent and heard no words.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jill_Bolte_Taylor
        
       | quickthrower2 wrote:
       | I would recommend Taoism type thinking for this person because
       | there needs to be acceptance that this reduced brain capacity (or
       | call it brain rewiring) is the way, while possible and
       | paradoxically trying to fix it at the same time.
       | 
       | If you are super switched on and rely on that smartness as part
       | of your identity that's gonna hurt when it's diminished. And you
       | switch from go getter to helped person.
        
       | DoreenMichele wrote:
       | I enjoyed the wit and sense of humor of this piece. I have a
       | serious medical condition and, yeah, perspective and priorities
       | change after your life gets hit by a truck, whether literally or
       | metaphorically.
       | 
       | It can be hard to convey what that's like and that there are bad
       | things but also sometimes good comes out of it and you can choose
       | to embrace the good parts of it and amplify them while continuing
       | to try to resolve the very real problems you have been left with.
       | 
       | For me, this was a good read.
        
       | pianoben wrote:
       | This headline is like a bad r/nosleep title. Someday, somehow, I
       | hope we move past this dumb clickbait style.
        
         | ta988 wrote:
         | Or we should just get past the FOMO and let some stuff
         | unclicked and focus on things interesting for us.
        
           | pianoben wrote:
           | Personally I got over that _long_ ago; the style itself just
           | irks me to see. I left Facebook to get away from attention-
           | economy junk and am sad to see it show up here.
        
         | adamrezich wrote:
         | the attention economy demands it, as long as it reigns supreme
         | we'll never be free from this dumb shit
        
           | doggodaddo78 wrote:
           | I think we need more obsessive and honest curation of titles.
           | 
           | Perhaps a "launch a title change vote" feature so the
           | community can fix it.
        
           | tyingq wrote:
           | It's not really new. https://www.google.com/search?q=yellow+j
           | ournalism+headlines&...
        
             | blowski wrote:
             | Exactly! While most click bait has interesting titles, not
             | all interesting titles are clickbait. So many people seem
             | to want headlines to be merely an 80 character summary of
             | the article. That's fine on articles of news - "so and so
             | has died", "Country declares war on Country Y". Or in
             | tutorials. But in pieces of writing we are reading mostly
             | for leisure there's no reason for it to have such a matter-
             | of-fact title.
             | 
             | For me clickbait is hyper-sensationalised, usually
             | misleading, and typically the article doesn't deliver what
             | the title says it will. None of those three attributes are
             | true of this title or article.
        
         | oh_sigh wrote:
         | Also misleading...usually when people talk about "quiet mind"
         | they're talking about meditation, not TBIs
        
           | mewpmewp2 wrote:
           | Thought it was obvious that it was meant to be a cheeky type
           | of title.
        
         | doggodaddo78 wrote:
         | You think it's an article on the downsides of excessive
         | patience or zen meditation, but no, TBI.
         | 
         | As a tangent: I learned how to enter a waking ideation / guided
         | daydreaming state associated with sensory deprivation without
         | extreme stimuli removal. It is good for startup ideas (not that
         | they're any good but for generating them), fiction novel
         | outlines, and letting your subconscious out.
         | 
         | Edit since I can't comment below right now:
         | 
         | I'm so sorry, I learned it intuitively by spending days / weeks
         | by myself without human contact or interruptions in a low
         | stimuli environment. Instead of going "crazy," it's possible
         | the mind can entertain and amuse itself. I think this also
         | explains why kids (and adults) in very poor countries have such
         | wild imaginations and are so happy when they have almost
         | nothing. And, where else would magical realism arise if not
         | Colombia?
        
           | ta1234567890 wrote:
           | > As a tangent: I learned how to enter a waking ideation /
           | guided daydreaming state associated with sensory deprivation
           | without extreme stimuli removal.
           | 
           | Awesome. How? Any books/articles/resources that could help?
        
         | Sr_developer wrote:
         | Just think 35 "persons" voted for it. Most probably than not
         | the voting is being heavily manipulated, but still.
        
         | mewpmewp2 wrote:
         | I kind of like this title, it in my view throws shade to all
         | the regurgitated desire to reach the monk/quiet mind status.
         | 
         | And I intuitively guessed it to be about something like that,
         | so didn't consider it to be clickbait per se, and the story was
         | great.
        
         | eric_b wrote:
         | Yeah, I couldn't get very far in to it. Something about the
         | author's tone and writing style was awkward and offputting.
        
           | Tade0 wrote:
           | To me it felt very self-centered. Like that bit about having
           | the worst injury. Was it really worth pointing out?
        
             | mewpmewp2 wrote:
             | Worst injury out of the family, and I'd definitely agree
             | with her. I definitely throughout the story was able to
             | imagine myself being in her position and how dreadful it
             | would be. I think self centered is totally fine, since it's
             | her shitty circumstances that could really happen to
             | anyone.
             | 
             | Losing your intelligence could very well be one of the
             | scariest things.
        
           | robocat wrote:
           | Perhaps due to her head injury - I was surprised at how
           | readable it was and just presumed she had significant help
           | editing it (although that is unclear, perhaps not).
        
           | maydup-nem wrote:
           | On the contrary, I enjoyed it and read the whole thing with
           | interest.
        
           | sergiomattei wrote:
           | I felt like after reading the first paragraph, everything
           | afterwards was just the same, written differently over and
           | over again.
        
       | hownottowrite wrote:
       | My mother died from a traumatic brain injury. She fell down the
       | basement stairs in the middle of the night and smacked her head
       | on the floor. They tried to fix her up at the hospital but as is
       | common with TBI her brain began to swell.
       | 
       | They tried trepanation. It did not work.
       | 
       | She went brain dead. I was half a world away at work. My father
       | made me make the decision. The doctors pulled the plug on her
       | 52nd birthday.
       | 
       | That was 20 years ago this very year.
       | 
       | I do wish they'd put a warning on these types of articles.
        
         | elwell wrote:
         | I'm sorry to hear that; that's so sad.
        
       | Invictus0 wrote:
       | I truly sympathize with this woman--an injury of this nature
       | dramatically alters your perspective on life. I had a small brain
       | injury about 2 months ago; I never got a diagnosis from my high
       | powered neurologist but we suspected it was related to covid.
       | Thankfully I recovered after about a month. The symptoms of brain
       | injury can be incredibly weird. I'm in touch with people who no
       | longer experience emotions; who lost their internal monologue. My
       | weird symptom was that I would get headaches and light
       | sensitivity after sex.
       | 
       | It's interesting. You find out that most of the people you
       | thought cared about you actually don't. You find out that most of
       | the things you cared about don't actually matter. You find out
       | that the neurologists that were supposed to save you are actually
       | just wasting MRI time to write bullshit papers to pad their CV.
       | Even if they wanted to help you, they don't really know anything
       | about the brain, and are dozens of breakthroughs away from
       | getting there, and the few medications at their disposal can't
       | change the reality that neurons don't heal or regenerate, and
       | you'll have to make do with fewer of them. The world moves on
       | without you and it doesn't care if you recover or not. If you
       | were smart, you desperately try to avoid being lumped in with
       | "stupid people", knowing how little respect people have for that
       | population. You realize how much your intelligence factored into
       | your ego and identity. It's not your fault after all. This isn't
       | who you are. It's just an injury. But eventually you come to
       | terms with the fact that your brain really does define who you
       | are, and maybe you accept that or maybe you don't.
        
       | ALittleLight wrote:
       | Reading the author's description of waking up in a hospital bed
       | reminded of when I found myself waking up in one. I felt like I
       | was peeing the bed and was embarrassed about it. I couldn't move
       | or look much, so I was exploring with my hands to "assess the
       | damage" and wondering how I was going to explain wetting the bed
       | as an adult to _whoever_ when I discovered the good and bad news.
       | Good news - I hadn 't wet the bed. Bad news - I had a catheter.
       | 
       | The author's brain injury, of course, is much more unsettling.
       | But, if the old you has died, then it's not coming back. May as
       | well make the best of the new you.
        
       | megablast wrote:
       | Cars are so incredibly destructive to society, in so many ways.
       | But most people are so blase about them.
        
         | viburnum wrote:
         | America has nearly twice the car death rate of Canada (and
         | Canada hardly has substantially better weather or density than
         | America). It's crazy.
        
           | tyingq wrote:
           | The US does rate pretty high in "traffic deaths per 100k
           | people".
           | 
           | But they also lead the world in how much they drive. 8,800
           | kilometers per capita, versus 4,300 in Canada, 7,000 in
           | Germany and less than 1,700 in Japan.
           | 
           | https://usa.streetsblog.org/2018/12/13/why-the-u-s-trails-
           | th...
           | 
           | I'm sure there are other factors, but that would explain most
           | of the difference vs Canada. Twice as much driving means
           | twice as many traffic deaths per capita.
           | 
           | Edit: Yes, I agree the US has work to do either way.
        
             | occz wrote:
             | Seems like something that should be rectified - the
             | entirety of american society should be redesigned to reduce
             | the amount of driving required.
        
               | throwaway4pooxi wrote:
               | Or we should continue to iterate and improve.
               | 
               | You assume all the driving is required, a lot of driving
               | is leisure.
               | 
               | I do agree that cities should stop blowing tax payer
               | money that should be spent on public transportation
               | (looking at you 80 billion cali train)
               | 
               | But I support a fragmented society where towns are
               | connected by highways and interstates and trucks and cars
               | can travel freely.
               | 
               | Most of the disdain for cars come from city slickers
               | burnt by traffic and lack of parking.
               | 
               | It's a scaling problem, not a car problem. Fix your
               | politicians.
        
             | leoedin wrote:
             | But even if you look at road deaths per billion km driven,
             | the US still scores 7.3 - more than twice Norway's 3, or
             | the UK's 3.4, and still a fair bit more than all those
             | other countries.
             | 
             | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffi
             | c...
             | 
             | Yes, the US drives more. But there's also room for
             | improvement compared to the safest countries.
        
         | caconym_ wrote:
         | Does anyone else feel like it's almost always a pickup truck?
         | This article^[1] that I found a while back claims occupants of
         | a car are 2.5 times more likely to die in a collision with a
         | pickup truck than another car.
         | 
         | It's an atrocity, and it's insane to me that it's almost
         | totally absent from the public discourse.
         | 
         | ^[1] https://www.iihs.org/topics/vehicle-size-and-weight
        
           | xvector wrote:
           | There are no reasonable pickup truck safety regulations in
           | the US. Pickup trucks are simply not safe vehicles for other
           | individuals around them. Some are so large that you can't
           | even see small children in front. [0]
           | 
           | The front of most pickup trucks is _literally a flat wall,_
           | whereas most cars and SUVs have to design for potential
           | pedestrian impact and whatnot. If you get hit by a pickup
           | truck you _will_ be pancaked, but if you get hit by a modern
           | car you have a chance of surviving.
           | 
           | You can thank lawmakers acting on the whims of corporate
           | lobbyists for this. [1] It makes my blood boil, how our
           | elected representatives so casually throw away lives of their
           | citizens.
           | 
           | 90% of pickup truck owners don't actually need their pickup
           | trucks, but are allowed to buy and drive these incredibly
           | dangerous vehicles regardless. In turn, this causes an
           | escalating arms race - everyone else feels the need to buy an
           | SUV or other large vehicle. Vehicles get heavier, bigger, and
           | deadlier. The cycle continues.
           | 
           | Part of the issue is that it's part of the self-image of red-
           | blooded American manliness to own a pickup truck. It's
           | ridiculous and childish, but owning a pickup truck is seen as
           | cool and macho throughout large swaths of the country. It
           | will be almost impossible to pass safety regulations against
           | pickup trucks thanks to this population.
           | 
           | [0]: https://www.consumerreports.org/car-safety/the-hidden-
           | danger...
           | 
           | [1]: https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/recips.php?cycle=
           | 2020...
        
         | apozem wrote:
         | They really are. I'm reminded of George Miller, who created and
         | directed the Mad Max movies. Those movies are about how cars
         | are terrifying death machines that shred human bodies. Miller
         | said he was "inspired" after working several years as an ER
         | doctor, seeing the damage firsthand.
        
       | prvc wrote:
       | To de-clickbait this article: the author had a traumatic brain
       | injury which eliminated her racing inner monologue.
        
         | _rpd wrote:
         | perhaps ... which temporarily impaired her executive function.
        
           | Aerroon wrote:
           | It might not be temporary. Doctors told her that it might
           | come back, but it might never be at full power as before.
        
       | ggm wrote:
       | At the other end of the scale, unrelated to severe trauma I truly
       | believe we don't come back from anaesthesia entirely the same. I
       | have no scientific basis for this belief, it's just how I feel
       | about the experience of waking up from anaesthesia twice.
       | 
       | The "who am I" in this article is strong. Who is asking the
       | questions? Is it the same "me" from before time? The other one,
       | knew what parmesan looked like.
        
       | mensetmanusman wrote:
       | A family member last year had a psychotic episode that lasted a
       | couple months where they lost contact with reality and became a
       | different person (undiagnosed schizophrenia).
       | 
       | After their care, they said the hardest thing is understanding
       | who they were, and who they are now (since the medication does
       | change their personality somewhat).
        
       | draw_down wrote:
       | "Sure my family just died in a car wreck but more importantly, it
       | sucks that Donald trump is president"
        
       | antisthenes wrote:
       | It's eerie how accurately she describes some of the symptoms. My
       | injury, about a year ago was less severe, but also resulted in
       | TBI. I think in a way our inner monologue is responsible for our
       | creative side and for our ability to plan things in advance.
       | 
       | What sucks the most (for me) is not being able to judge how bad
       | it actually is:
       | 
       | I don't know how much executive/planning function was lost. I
       | don't know much of my sense of smell was lost (nose/sinus injury)
       | I don't know when, if ever, my creativity will come back. I don't
       | know how bad my short term memory now is, just that it's worse. I
       | don't know if the brain fog is permanent or just a result of what
       | now seems to be constant insomnia. I don't know if people are
       | going to keep expecting me to get back to 100% or if I should
       | tell them to expect less of me now. I struggle for words
       | frequently.
       | 
       | I was planning on taking an IQ test, but what would it tell me if
       | I don't have a baseline pre-injury to compare it to?
       | 
       | People like her have it very tough. TBI sufferers don't really
       | wear it as a badge, and 99.9% of the time they look perfectly
       | functional and normal from the outside.
       | 
       | But the battle we fight inside can sometimes be exhausting and
       | very depressing.
        
       | throwaway205826 wrote:
       | A few years ago I got some kind of brain illness. Doctors were
       | unable to come up with a strong diagnosis, which is apparently
       | quite common for such cases.
       | 
       | One of the effects of the illness was that I essentially became
       | stupid. I couldn't focus on anything (even trivial activities
       | like watching television), I couldn't compose emails, I would get
       | disoriented easily. It was absolutely terrifying not knowing
       | whether or not my mind would come back. At the time, I would have
       | preferred having a disease like cancer because at least I would
       | know what I'm dealing with. Eventually I did start to get better.
       | Like the author, I think I'm probably not quite back to who I was
       | before getting sick.
       | 
       | A couple things I learned from my interaction with the medical
       | system - 1. Like any other industry, 90% of medical "experts" are
       | totally incompetent. 2. The state of diagnostics is pretty
       | abysmal. So much of medicine is completely nonscientific
       | guesswork. Most doctors aren't even aware of the latest
       | diagnostic developments in their own fields. Think about the
       | people you know who learned Java in college and then never
       | learned another programming language; chances are, your doctor is
       | that kind of person.
        
         | hellbannedguy wrote:
         | They do like mentioning The Art Of Medicine when it's not a
         | simple ailment, or treatment failure. And I get it.
         | 
         | It might be the only profession I know of that can still bill
         | though. They make sure they are paid.
         | 
         | I do get the difficulty of the profession. I know most
         | treatments are Placebo cures. It's a weird profession. Or, we
         | still know very little, especially ailments that affect the
         | brain.
        
         | monoideism wrote:
         | > . Like any other industry, 90% of medical "experts" are
         | totally incompetent.
         | 
         | 100% correct. I'm dealing with some serious health issues the
         | past year (multiple worsening chronic conditions, in and out of
         | hospital, lost 30 lbs in 3 months, etc). And yeah, the vast
         | majority of them are idiots who know nothing more than to pull
         | out a (often dangerous) pharma that addresses a single symptom.
         | And forget treatment - I was just hoping for a firm diagnosis.
         | But they hem and haw, and don't seem at all up to date with the
         | latest research. You're on your own.
        
         | codingwageslave wrote:
         | I've been trying to tell people this. It's always met with
         | ridicule
        
         | ashton314 wrote:
         | First, my sincere condolences. That is terrifying.
         | 
         | > Think about the people you know who learned Java in college
         | and then never learned another programming language; chances
         | are, your doctor is that kind of person.
         | 
         | Ooof. That is a really good analogy.
        
         | garenp wrote:
         | Was there anything you did that helped you get better?
        
           | throwaway205826 wrote:
           | Hard to say what actually helped, but two high-impact low-
           | cost behavioral changes I made (and stuck with) were a strict
           | ketogenic diet and regular heavy exercise (mixture of cardio
           | and weight training). Ketogenic diet has a lot going for it -
           | besides being a nice elimination diet (in case your problem
           | is some kind of dietary autoimmune condition or food allergy
           | or something), it also treats a lot of possible metabolic
           | conditions. Exercise as well. I'm sure resting (mentally)
           | helped but I didn't have much choice there - resting was the
           | only activity I could really do, and even that I couldn't do
           | very well.
        
         | skadamou wrote:
         | I'm so sorry this happened to you and I'm glad you are starting
         | to feel at least somewhat back to your old self. I definitely
         | understand where this opinion of docs is coming from as there
         | are definitely some incompetent docs out there but don't you
         | think that your opinion is largely based around an anecdotal
         | experience that is probably pretty abnormal? Medicine as a
         | field is still pretty unscientific in a lot of ways. To me it
         | feels like docs are like alchemists before the discovery of the
         | atom/modern chemistry. They're doing the best they can with the
         | tools at hand but their field has some fundamental gaps in
         | knowledge. Is that really the doctors fault?
         | 
         | That's just my two cents. Obviously this doesn't do much to
         | help folks dealing with poorly understood illnesses but I hope
         | it helps balance out the "all doctors are idiots" opinion that
         | sometimes comes up in threads like this.
        
           | throwaway205826 wrote:
           | > Is that really the doctors fault?
           | 
           | It seemed that most of the doctors I had to deal with were
           | incompetent either because they were lazy or stupid.
           | Realistically maybe they were just overworked, but the effect
           | was the same. I'm not really interested in assigning "fault"
           | here - that's just a factual observation I made.
        
             | nradov wrote:
             | Are you qualified to evaluate competence in that field?
             | What specific criteria did you use?
        
           | lrem wrote:
           | Idiots is the wrong word. They've achieved a state of the art
           | knowledge. An idiot wouldn't get there. The problem is, most
           | of them stopped at that. And state of the art moved on.
        
         | georgeecollins wrote:
         | >> 1. Like any other industry, 90% of medical "experts" are
         | totally incompetent.
         | 
         | I would need data to accept this, not anecdote. There is a
         | tendency for smart people to think they know better than
         | experts.
        
         | StavrosK wrote:
         | Did you also hear a sound like a bass guitar string snapping
         | when this happened?
        
         | rmah wrote:
         | First, I'm so sorry you're going through this illness and hope
         | that you make a full recovery.
         | 
         | But I think that, to some degree, your feelings about the
         | medical profession is a reflection of just how good medicine is
         | these days. People go to the doctor _expecting_ an accurate
         | diagnosis and a treatment or cure. And, to be fair, 80% of the
         | time, that 's what they get. It's hard to overstate just how
         | much of a radical shift in expectations this is.
         | 
         | Just a century ago, a compound fracture could be a death
         | sentence. People randomly got sick a just dropped dead. Going
         | to a doctor _might_ , _maybe_ , if you were _lucky_ , fix what
         | ailed you. Hell, just two centuries ago, doctors as we think of
         | them today simply did not exist. Three centuries ago, people in
         | Europe were routinely bled to balance the humors.
         | 
         | Biological systems are mind-numbingly complex. All the simple
         | stuff has been figured out -- and if they are diseases mostly
         | eradicated. Even so, I think that people's expectations of what
         | doctors do is a bit... off. 99% of doctors are not scientists
         | -- they are human body mechanics. And that means they mostly
         | focus on common problems. Because, you know, they're common.
         | 
         | And neurological conditions are some of the most difficult to
         | diagnose. Imaging techniques like MRI or CT often show no
         | problems. Exploratory surgery is _highly risky_ and also
         | usually have no benefit. To extend the mechanic analogy,
         | imagine going to your mechanic and saying  "my car's GPS system
         | is sluggish. sometimes. What's wrong?" and then expecting them
         | to figure out what's wrong without being able to look "under
         | the hood" of the computer system. All they can is use the GPS
         | system and observe its behavior. That's essentially what
         | neurologists have to do quite often. Tough job.
         | 
         | The good news is that there are doctors who engage in research.
         | And they are, by trial and error, improving the state of the
         | art of medicine. Does this knowledge get propagated to all
         | other doctors rapidly enough? Probably not. But the knowledge
         | dissemination is probably better today than ever before too.
         | Obviously things can be improved. As pretty much anything can
         | be improved. It just doesn't seem very helpful to spout
         | "doctors are idiots" as some other posts seem to do.
        
         | CyberDildonics wrote:
         | It's amazing that you made this name and another, both posting
         | a comment in this thread one minute after creation talking
         | about how great this article is while lots of other people in
         | the thread are calling it terribly written clickbait.
        
           | throw9239393 wrote:
           | I also made a throwaway account to make a comment here. I
           | also said the article was well written. I am an HN regular,
           | but didn't want my medical problem tied to my HN account
           | name.
           | 
           | Is it that odd that we might have polar opposite views on the
           | article? Or that having a somewhat similar experience to the
           | author, that I might view the article differently than you
           | do?
        
             | CyberDildonics wrote:
             | It is odd that you would make two different names just to
             | talk up the article, yes.
        
           | ROARosen wrote:
           | ... Or maybe the commenter is not interested in announcing
           | their medical history under their "real" (nik)name.
        
         | teh_infallible wrote:
         | I honestly believe that the dumbest software developer is
         | smarter than the average doctor.
         | 
         | Look at how they prescribe drugs for the side effects of other
         | drugs. Imagine coding a software patch to fix a bug introduced
         | by another patch.
        
           | the_af wrote:
           | > _Imagine coding a software patch to fix a bug introduced by
           | another patch._
           | 
           | But this is very common! Far from mocking my fellow
           | developers, I'll be the first to admit I've been guilty of
           | this many times.
        
           | mewpmewp2 wrote:
           | What's wrong with prescribing a drug for a side effect of
           | another drug?
           | 
           | If you get cancer, the treatment you get can cause very many
           | side effects which in turn can potentially be alleviated by
           | other type of medicine. What would your suggestion be? Not to
           | treat the patient at all?
        
           | StavrosK wrote:
           | You have no idea how much technical debt there is in the
           | average body. There's much more technical debt in the body
           | than there is technology in the world.
           | 
           | The two systems aren't remotely comparable in complexity.
        
           | DoreenMichele wrote:
           | That's at least partly about how medicine gets monetized.
           | 
           | Imagine a world in which you got paid for patches instead of
           | being paid by the hour. Patches on patches would likely
           | proliferate.
        
           | kevinmgranger wrote:
           | > Imagine coding a software patch to fix a bug introduced by
           | another patch.
           | 
           | This happens all the time.
        
           | JoBrad wrote:
           | This was sarcasm, right? I'm not one of the old-timers by any
           | stretch, but I've seen plenty of code that compensates for
           | workarounds introduced by poor planning or hastily-cobbled
           | code.
        
         | dave_sid wrote:
         | Hey that's me you're talking about! Actually I dabbled a little
         | in Swift to maybe I'm okay.
        
         | thrwawy06182021 wrote:
         | I also am suffering from something similar. I have the working
         | theory it's from extreme burnout but do not know for sure. I
         | would tremendously appreciate if you shared what you found to
         | help?
        
           | throwaway205826 wrote:
           | It's hard to say what actually helped, but I tried a bunch of
           | behavioral changes. Two I've stuck with are significantly
           | increased exercise (half an hour plus of intense exercise
           | every day) and a strict ketogenic diet. Even if they didn't
           | do anything at all for my primary condition, they've resulted
           | in totally orthogonal improvements to my life. A couple
           | months of rest (didn't have much choice there - I couldn't do
           | anything else). I also used nicotine gum as a behavioral
           | reinforcement drug to help "rehabilitate" myself on the way
           | back to health, and THC to help me sleep.
           | 
           | FWIW, I think it's unlikely my problem was burnout - I had a
           | number of viral-characteristic physiological symptoms such as
           | digestive problems, coughing, and heart palpitations, and I
           | would be surprised if they had a purely neurochemical cause -
           | but in either case hopefully some of these behaviors could
           | help.
        
         | cowanon22 wrote:
         | > Like any other industry, 90% of medical "experts" are totally
         | incompetent.
         | 
         | I would guess it's even worse, maybe 1-5% of doctors truly
         | understand the underlying physiology and will holistically look
         | at all of the information. Most doctors I've met use population
         | heuristics and published guidelines, and if you have something
         | rare they just throw stuff at the wall instead of trying to
         | understand it.
        
           | b5n wrote:
           | If you have any questions or attempt to have a discussion
           | most doctors assume a 'where did you go to medical school'
           | mentality, proceed to type your symptoms into an app, and
           | then simply regurgitate the output.
        
         | temikus wrote:
         | I'm sorry to hear this has happened to you and I do hope you're
         | only going to get better.
         | 
         | State of diagnostics is indeed very poor, esp. in a field like
         | Immunology. It took 2 years and 4 doctors to find what was
         | wrong with me and how to treat it. I had to scour medical
         | journals for treatment suggestions and then press on my doctors
         | to try it. Sigh.
        
         | AnIdiotOnTheNet wrote:
         | > 1. Like any other industry, 90% of medical "experts" are
         | totally incompetent.
         | 
         | Yeah, I've come to the same conclusion. When I was a kid it
         | took 2 years to diagnose my, frankly quite textbook,
         | hypothyroidism. Know who first diagnosed it? A friend of my
         | mother's who worked the toll booth at the airport. Her dog had
         | it, you see, so she recognized the symptoms. My mother had to
         | go full Karen mode on a doctor to get them to order the simple
         | blood test that would confirm it.
        
           | lupinglade wrote:
           | Same conclusion here as well.
        
           | throwaway205826 wrote:
           | Yep, if you really want someone to think hard about your
           | condition, a hospital is the wrong place to go. And a lot of
           | doctors will become defensive when they realize you've put
           | more thought into it than they have.
        
           | data_spy wrote:
           | Not sure if true, but whenever I've had a foreign born
           | doctor, they tended to be better in my experience.
        
           | tyingq wrote:
           | Same for me. Slightly bulging neck. Itchy calves. Dry skin.
           | Lethargy. Took years before anyone ran the relatively simple
           | TSH test.
        
           | quickthrower2 wrote:
           | With doctors, you are your own doctor and the doctors you see
           | are subcontractors. First appointment is a job interview.
           | That's the best way to think of it IMO. I guess I'm
           | privileged to have the money to do this.
           | 
           | Google helps you know what it could be, but you need to do a
           | fair bit of research and critical thinking.
           | 
           | Unfortunately if you are sick this is the last thing you want
           | to do!
        
         | fellowniusmonk wrote:
         | While I have no particular position, my brother is a molecular
         | biologist and bioinformatics guy who has been published in
         | nature, featured in NYT, etc. A true scientific nerds nerd, and
         | he endlessly ridiculed the poor science and poor scientific
         | understanding of people on the M.D. track that he interacted
         | with in labs while he was doing research.
         | 
         | I do have this anecdote from deep personal experience though...
         | pediatric cardiologists working at research hospitals are some
         | of the kindest, most compassionate, honest and respectful
         | people I have met. Everyone tends to treat children with
         | condescension and patronization (and I feel safe to extrapolate
         | that toward their views of people in general), but those
         | doctors seem to know that as a child you've been weighed... or
         | maybe they just comes from a place of true compassion and pity,
         | people underestimate the importance of compassion, kindness and
         | listening by doctors.. especially as issues become more
         | complex.
         | 
         | I do think AI assistance is going to make a large difference in
         | medical diagnostics work even if reality hasn't caught up with
         | the hype yet.
        
           | gwittel wrote:
           | > poor science and poor scientific understanding of people on
           | the M.D. track
           | 
           | Definitely a thing. At least historically, research is not a
           | big part of a MD program in the US. MD/PhD programs are where
           | its at -- Basically you do a few years of med school, then
           | PhD, then finish MD. Its a very long haul. After which you
           | usually go into Postdoc research or medical residency.
           | 
           | The best doctor I ever had was incredibly perceptive and
           | compassionate. What did she teach in med school? How to work
           | with patients (i.e. bedside manner). She moved on to head
           | palliative care, another area where empathy is key.
           | 
           | Like any other profession doctors span a range of competency.
           | There is an old joke: What do you call the person who
           | finished last in medical school? Doctor.
        
           | blablabla123 wrote:
           | I remember former fellow students telling how they corrected
           | medical students' practical physics internship assignments.
           | Apparently the statistical rigour is much lower. On the other
           | hand, I guess in pure natural sciences you work with much
           | more indirection and have zero results nowadays unless you
           | use a lot of tools. Probably there aren't that many medical
           | conditions that can be treated in-depth based on first
           | principles but I think concluding that whole medical science
           | can be replaced by an AI assistant might be a bit far-
           | fetched. Compassion is probably under-estimated indeed. Some
           | people with serious conditions prefer to be treated at
           | objectively less sophisticated yet less industrialized
           | facilities.
        
             | fellowniusmonk wrote:
             | I also think "concluding that whole medical science can be
             | replaced by an AI assistant" is far fetched. I hope that
             | wasn't what you took away from my comment.
        
           | meheleventyone wrote:
           | It's a bit of a misunderstanding of the role of doctors as
           | well IMO. Apart from a small fraction of them they aren't
           | scientists or researchers and aren't supposed to be. And the
           | human body is complex, problems can arise which can't easily
           | be understood. The expectation that every doctor is House and
           | we'll each get millions of dollar of diagnostics is wrong.
           | There's also a reason why experiments in science require an
           | awful lot of preparation and rigor that doesn't exist in the
           | happenstance of the real world. No AI is going to solve for a
           | lack of information or confounding factors that make
           | understanding what's happened impossible.
           | 
           | I had a heart attack nearly six weeks ago despite being
           | healthy, fit and having no chronic health issues. They kept
           | me in hospital for five days after I got a clot squished by a
           | stent. I've come back negative for basically everything bar
           | some immune disorder tests I'm waiting on the results of. The
           | fact I've not heard probably means those were negative as
           | well. So I got this fatal blood clot and the medical staff
           | absolutely knocked it out of the park in terms of working out
           | what the acute issue was, dealing with it without undue
           | distress (seriously a PCI is magic) and my care and
           | rehabilitation afterwards has been great. But I'll likely
           | never know why it happened.
           | 
           | The other side of that is I end up on a standard cocktail of
           | medication despite having a normal blood pressure, normal
           | cholesterol and so on. Essentially the drug regime seems
           | calibrated for the average heart attack patient which is
           | someone older with chronic problems. I had a rash as a side
           | effect and the doctors swapped a med and I'm fine again. How
           | did they know what to change of the six meds? I guess
           | experience and wider statistical analysis in the medical
           | community. It worked!
        
       | throw9239393 wrote:
       | Really well written, especially considering the author's plight.
       | 
       | Regarding this bit:
       | 
       | > _The day of the accident I had been working on a project to
       | improve how homeless people are placed into shelters. I say out
       | loud, "I don't care about homeless people" to see how it feels.
       | It doesn't ring true; I do care about homeless people. I just
       | don't feel like working._
       | 
       | I wonder if that's directly to do with the brain damage or not. I
       | survived a particularly rough "you're gonna die" type cancer. And
       | I have similar issues with depression, motivation,
       | procrastination, and so on. Which I know sounds counter-
       | intuitive. I survived, and the physical aftermath isn't really
       | bad. So I should be grateful versus depressed, right? I have
       | tried a variety of depression meds over the 5 years that have
       | passed. I really can't tell if any of them work. I suppose partly
       | because I'm not despondent really...just mostly unmotivated. None
       | of them changed that.
       | 
       | Anyhow, just to say that near-death experiences, even without
       | physical damage to the brain, seem to have mental consequences.
        
         | PKop wrote:
         | The book "Tribe: On Homecoming and Belonging" discusses similar
         | dynamics with returning combat troops, and others that have
         | lived through war or extreme challenging scenarios. The
         | surprising finding is it's not the memory of the event that
         | causes PTSD/depression, but returning to "normal" modern,
         | atomized and isolated life of relative peace and stability..
         | and losing the excitement, adrenaline/thrill of events arguably
         | humans have been adapted to thrive in: challenges and
         | struggles, especially alongside a group of people facing same
         | challenge together. Many people have been polled as being
         | happier in for example war time London facing bombing raids,
         | death and destruction, than peacetime after WW2. It's a good
         | read.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | zrail wrote:
         | I survived a not terribly life threatening form of cancer. Two
         | people in my family died of worse forms in that same year.
         | 
         | Things haven't quite been the same since.
        
       | qwerty456127 wrote:
       | > Of all the injuries we suffered, mine is the worst. My brain
       | injury has shaken my confidence in my own personality, my own
       | existence.
       | 
       | I don't exist. That's the secret. This concept took me years to
       | grok but now I know.
        
         | tux1968 wrote:
         | I have good news for you. Ignoring the small chance that you're
         | actually a figment of my imagination, I can confirm you
         | actually do exist.
        
           | sergiomattei wrote:
           | I can confirm your existence and the parent's existence.
        
             | koo6 wrote:
             | I can confirm your non-existence.
        
             | elwell wrote:
             | Your confirmation isn't proof.
        
         | sumnole wrote:
         | I've been thinking that I'm the only one I know for sure
         | 'exists'
        
         | wizzwizz4 wrote:
         | That's not really very useful. Of course you exist! You share
         | sufficiently many properties with other things that we would
         | say "exist" that it is more useful to consider you extant than
         | non-existent.
         | 
         | What you _mean_ might be a more useful, meaningful concept, but
         | what you 've _said_ is kinda nonsense. If you don 't exist, who
         | wrote this comment? I'd be interested if you could elaborate.
        
           | aj3 wrote:
           | They where probably saying that "I" doesn't exist as brain
           | doesn't really work that way and inner voice/narrator is just
           | illusion.
        
           | qwerty456127 wrote:
           | > If you don't exist, who wrote this comment?
           | 
           | The hands. Driven by the chemical phenomena taking place in
           | the brain given the information it had been fed previously.
           | Both the hands and the brain and the memories are mine but
           | not me. The same way my finger is (I won't be less me if I
           | loose it, neither I will if I loose a memory of something,
           | even of my name) and my car is. I am merely the observer of
           | all these but ok, then where this me which "merely is" is
           | then? Nowhere because whatever a thing within my body or
           | personality I could point to is mine. Where will that me go
           | when I die or when the universe collapses into a singularity
           | and booms in a next big bang - nowhere, which is exactly
           | where it is now. Because it doesn't exist.
           | 
           | This is a very rough simplification though (in fact the
           | hands, the memories etc aren't even mine if everything else
           | in the world isn't). I had to digest this for years and
           | observe this, excuse me for some nonsense, from different
           | angles inside the multi-dimensional space of pure non-verbal
           | semantic experiences perception. This can be a long way to
           | develop this ability and I am not sure many are ready to go
           | this way. No, I'm not a heavy psychedelic abuser, nor a new-
           | age loon, nor depressed, nor psychopathic, I am sober,
           | enthusiastic, generally Okay, happy and compassionate and the
           | realization of the above only made me even more of these and
           | helped me through the hard times.
           | 
           | The first step is to observe it (a pure meaning without
           | words) when you know exactly what you want to say but can't
           | recall a proper word in any of the languages you speak.
           | 
           | If I were to seriously rationalize this I would say nobody
           | writes the comment, it is an emergent structure resulting
           | from a very complex fractal system. Whoever is not really
           | into this but feels curious and wants an easy explanation
           | watch the Dr. Sapolsky's lectures on emergence in his
           | behavioral biology course on YouTube.
        
             | antihipocrat wrote:
             | When you say you don't exist are you referring to your
             | sense of self identity? i.e your ego, the feeling that your
             | mind and body and all of your senses, emotions, thoughts
             | and memories are a distinct entity?
             | 
             | This idea is very interesting, and not considered strange
             | in philosophy (ego death) and is also prevalent in
             | Buddhism: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatt%C4%81
        
             | jrsdav wrote:
             | I've found this concept is near impossible to share without
             | sounding, well, like you put it, "a new-age loon".
             | 
             | We haven't really developed a system or language that
             | succinctly expresses the nature of self or experience
             | (well, I only know English. Perhaps other languages lend
             | themselves better). For me, I find the simplest terms to be
             | the most profound way of capturing what you said, but when
             | I say them out loud to someone who hasn't climbed the same
             | "context mountain" I probably sound like someone you would
             | encounter at a drum circle in a public park (which I find
             | nothing to be wrong with, I should add!).
        
         | mypalmike wrote:
         | Can you expand on this a bit?
        
         | brodo wrote:
         | The Buddists call it
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatt%C4%81 Anatta. In
         | psychonautics it's called ego death. It can be frightening, but
         | for me it is a hopeful, unifying and happy idea.
        
       | Aerroon wrote:
       | > _Have I always been bad at finding things? Maybe? There are
       | limits to how well an injured brain can scrutinize an injured
       | brain._
       | 
       | This is something I've worried about ever since I was a teenager.
       | If something happens to my mind, how will I know? The answer I've
       | come up with is that you can't fully know, but my best bet is to
       | "reason on paper".
       | 
       | Externalize the facts and opinions (write them down or say them
       | out loud) and then run logic on them using some explainable
       | algorithm. Basically, do it like we do math: the numbers and
       | figures on paper will allow anyone to continue where you stopped.
       | Even if you forget what you were doing or you can't do large
       | scale abstract reasoning, because you've written it down, you can
       | do it piece by piece.
       | 
       | When I suffered what seemed to have been a "ministroke"
       | (basically a stroke that solves itself) my cognitive abilities
       | were obviously affected. I seemed to operate basically only on
       | short term memory - several seconds at a time. Anything that
       | happened before that seemed to fade from memory. Saying out loud
       | what I wanted to do and then continuously repeating it out loud
       | enabled me to do more complex tasks. Unfortunately, I had no
       | sense of danger from it.
       | 
       | Writing (typing), however, was not really possible. I knew what I
       | wanted to write, but it became "slurred". I hadn't considered
       | that before. I even recognized myself that what I wrote was
       | difficult to decipher, but somehow I just couldn't type out the
       | words correctly.
       | 
       | I still think that reasoning on paper or out loud is your best
       | bet in these situations.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-06-18 23:01 UTC)