[HN Gopher] Life as a public school teacher in the San Francisco... ___________________________________________________________________ Life as a public school teacher in the San Francisco Bay Area in 2021 Author : rossvor Score : 213 points Date : 2021-06-19 13:49 UTC (9 hours ago) (HTM) web link (adamcadre.ac) (TXT) w3m dump (adamcadre.ac) | DevKoala wrote: | Depressing read honestly. | fallingknife wrote: | > Another initiative headed for mandate status is a school policy | that no assignment can receive a grade of less than 50% | | > And my direct supervisor repeatedly demanded that I pace my | classes for the benefit of the single student in each section who | was struggling the most | | I don't understand school. Why do they do things like this? Who | actually thinks this is a good idea? I've never met anyone who | does. How have we gotten to the point where standards are not | allowed? | brighton36 wrote: | I've never understood school either. Now that I'm 40 years old, | I understand it less. I think there was a generation of adults | who were 'in on the rhetoric' at one point. Telling people that | these are places of education, instead of a kind of reformation | facility, akin to jail. | nerdponx wrote: | I don't get it either. People have learning and thinking | differences, we know that and have known it for years. | Accommodating those differences is important. Living out a | real-life version of Harrison Bergeron is not the only way to | do it. | jimbokun wrote: | > Harrison Bergeron | | Wow, I had never read that before: | | http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html | | This really captures so much of the current thinking around | "equity". | api wrote: | Yeah but a real life version of Harrison Bergeron may be the | cheapest lowest effort easiest to bureaucratize way to do it. | | Actually understanding and then adjusting to differences in | learning style, cultural background, etc. is really hard work | and is really hard to scale. It's an art form not something | that can be mass produced or reduced to a simple set of | rules. | rsj_hn wrote: | The problem is that "learning style" is not a thing. There | are good students and bad students, and there are students | who can understand the material but lack the ability to sit | still. So it's not like if you change "teaching styles" you | will be able to get the slower student the same information | as the faster student. The only way to do that is to do a | disservice to the faster student. | | What you can do, is create tracks so that everyone is | challenged but not put in a hopeless in a situation, and | the disruptive students you need to either expel so their | parents handle them or put them into some kind of separate | environment where they don't prevent others from learning. | | That's going to result in large inequalities in outcomes | because there are large inequalities in how fast students | mature and what their learning capabilities are. Neither of | these things -- student intelligence or student maturity -- | is something that the teachers can influence. | zepto wrote: | > there are students who can understand the material but | lack the ability to sit still | | These students would benefit from a different teaching | style, no? | rsj_hn wrote: | If you define "teaching style" to mean things like being | in the classroom, but that's not the usual definition. | The usual definition is explaining things in different | ways. | | The students around them (who can sit still) would | benefit from not being in the same classroom as students | who are disruptive, obviously. The disruptive students | might benefit from something like shorter classes and | time spent outside doing sports or other physical | activities that don't require sitting. But let's not | pretend that they will learn the same material. They will | learn less material, at least until they mature enough so | that they have more self-control and are able to sit | still, which might not happen before they leave high | school, or it may only happen in their senior year, etc. | Thus you put them into a different high school entirely | or at least a different diploma track. | zepto wrote: | > The usual definition is explaining things in different | ways. | | By that definition, what you say is true, but I haven't | heard anyone keep the definition that narrow for decades. | | Other styles for example, can include things like not | changing subjects every hour, but rather continuing until | the student is ready to change. | mustafa_pasi wrote: | Well, people are funding schools through taxes. Then they | send their kid to school. Then the school decides their kid | is too stupid* to do much, so they get relegated to dumb | class and their future career prospects get nullified. This | is how it works in many countries where schools are | segregated by learning ability. | | I make no judgement on how good or bad it is, but I get why | people would be upset by this system. | | *or has some mental issues like ADHD or whatever, which a lot | of countries do not even recognize as a thing | unishark wrote: | So rather than putting students that learn slowly into | classes that move slowly, you keep them in normal classes | where they drag along lost behind everyone else, and | possibly drag the rest of the class down with them. I don't | see how that is better for anyone involved, unless you | think the credential is all that matters. | treis wrote: | Because in practice concentrating the problem kids into | one class tends not to help them. They get warehoused and | fall further behind before being dumped onto society at | 18. | kyboren wrote: | So instead, let's put them with the high-achievers and | force those high-achievers to do the teacher's job of | tutoring them at the expense of their own educational | opportunity. | | I can see why schools likes it. But it's terrible policy | and hurts the higher-achieving students, who will be the | backbone of our increasingly winner-take-all knowledge- | and services-based economy. | treis wrote: | That's quite the straw man you've built there. | | Nobody is talking about forcing the high achievers to do | the teacher's job. The question is how we allocate the | fixed amount of educational resources we have. You want | us to choose the high achievers so that these early | winners can turn that lead into even greater success | later. Unstated in your post is what happens to those low | achieving students. But it's pretty easy to assume that | they're going to be the losers in the winner take all | economy. | | The other option is to help the low achieving students so | that more of them can participate in that winner take all | economy. I'm not sure how to argue that this latter | option is preferable since it seems so obvious to me that | it's the right choice to make. | thaumasiotes wrote: | > That's quite the straw man you've built there. | | > Nobody is talking about forcing the high achievers to | do the teacher's job. | | On the contrary, people can be quite explicit about this. | treis wrote: | It's not mandating everyone be equal. It's allocating | resources to those that need them most. Which is how I think | we all do our jobs. You spend your time on the systems that | perform poorly, not the ones that are working fine. | jimbokun wrote: | Or do you invest the most resources on the products, | customers, and markets giving you the greatest return? | | Investing in the most talented can give society outsize | returns in terms of innovation, skilled and talented public | servants, captivating art, and scientific discoveries. | fumar wrote: | Do you have examples? | tomp wrote: | Even for people who _do_ have this goal ( "helping those | who need it most") in mind, this reasoning doesn't make any | sense. | | There's only so much resources you can invest into a single | person. Their time is limited, so if their leaning rate is | slow, there's really nothing else that can be done beyond | some point to speed it up. Forrest Gump will never be | Stephen Hawking. | | The reality is that this equity movement is motivated | specifically by pushing down high-performers. They're | _removing_ (or _wasting_ ) resources just so that they | don't get to the top 10-30%. | brianwawok wrote: | No child left behind. | | It's been ruled that it's better that all students get to | 20-80% knowledge then some get 100% and some get 0%. | | Which is why many people choose to go to private schools if you | want to not be limited by this. | rkk3 wrote: | > Which is why many people choose to go to private schools if | you want to not be limited by this. | | Familiar with expensive Private schools Household names send | their kids too in CA. It's generally harder to fail a | student, sometimes explicitly impossible & against school | policy. | WanderPanda wrote: | I don't see the causal relationship between the 100%ers | getting 80% and the 0%ers suddenly getting 20% | orn688 wrote: | If you slow down the pace to help the "zero percenters" and | only cover 80% of the material in the allotted time, the | students who could have handled 100% of the material will | be limited to 80%. And that slowdown still won't be enough | to help the slowest learners much, so they'll still only | learn, say, 20% of the material. | unishark wrote: | also spend lots of class time repeating background | material students should already know. | antihero wrote: | Surely this can be solved by streaming? Here in the UK we had | bottom sets for the kids that were struggling, and top sets | for kids who excelled. This meant that the learning pace | could be tailored for each group. | | Still probably didn't stretch the top set kids as much as | private schools could, which is why I am in favour of | abolishing all private and grammar schools and making the | resources available to those schools available to top set | comprehensive school kids. | | It is wrong that children get educations that don't really | make the most of their brains because they have parents that | couldn't afford it. | | Also, I think the sociological benefits of having pupils from | all backgrounds occupying the same space and learning from | each other as opposed to being segregated is extremely | important. | | So many of the rich people in charge of the country have | absolutely no understanding of poverty because they have not | had the opportunity to grow up around it. | thrower123 wrote: | In former times, European countries could do this, because | you've had a homogenous pool to sort out by ability. | | Attempts to do this in the US produce results that appear | racist. | golemiprague wrote: | The advantage of a private school is not the extra gym | equipment or computer or any other resources, it is the | social class that matter. If you don't pay for private | school you will pay for location. There is no actual | mixing, people just pay more to be around people similar to | themselves and the cost of that will manifest in house | prices instead of school prices. | zepto wrote: | > and making the resources available to those schools | available | | How would you do this? It seems like it's impossible to tax | the group of people who _would have sent their kids to | private school had it been possible_. | | Equally it seems impossible to force the people who would | have chosen teaching careers at private schools to work at | comprehensive schools. | | That, and the fact that one of the 'resources' that private | schools have is flexibility to make decisions outside of | the comprehensive school system. | [deleted] | anm89 wrote: | No one thinks it's a good idea for the students. They think | it's a good idea for their career. | api wrote: | In college a similar phenomenon is grade inflation where | professors mark up grades to look like better professors or | get better student reviews. | cynicalkane wrote: | The system giving these rules is set up so the two are | indistinguishable. Some people can't even tell the | difference. Others can, but they keep quiet so their career | isn't destroyed. | analog31 wrote: | Playing devils advocate for a moment, as grading works right | now, a kid can quickly dig themselves into a hole that they | have no realistic way to get out of, e.g., by utterly bombing | on an exam or missing a few assignments early in the semester. | The motivation for that kid to progress any further is zero, | yet they are imprisoned in the classroom for the duration of | the semester. | | This hits very close to home for me, and I've read countless | comments on HN from people who are successful in life yet angry | and bitter about their K-12 experience. | | I don't know the answer to this, but meanwhile, messing with | the way school works is not exactly messing with success. | siliconc0w wrote: | +1 I saw this a lot with friends who were less interested in | school and would quickly bail on a class once they missed a | test or assignment and I couldn't really blame them. | | For me the point of a Math class is to learn and demonstrate | you understand certain concepts - it isn't to demonstrate | some proxy of 'work ethic' because you sat in a desk | somewhere on a regular schedule. So there should always be an | avenue left open for for the student to learn and demonstrate | the knowledge. | WalterBright wrote: | Caltech did it right. Professors were not allowed to grade | based on attendance. If you could pass the final, you | passed the class. If you could pass the final without even | taking the class, you would get credit (although very, very | few managed that feat!). | | I recall one student who flunked thermo. He filed a | complaint that the Prof had it in for him, hence the F. The | Prof provided evidence that he never did any of the | homework, and flunked the midterm and final. Case | dismissed. The student dropped out. | 6gvONxR4sf7o wrote: | Nothing is going to work while everything is paced by year. | In 7th grade, in the fall you are taught X, so if you miss it | the only solution is to take it next time: next fall with the | next year's 7th graders. | | In an ideal infinitely funded world, if you took 20% longer | to learn X, you'd just go slower, not be left behind. | WalterBright wrote: | > In 7th grade, in the fall you are taught X, so if you | miss it the only solution is to take it next time | | In my experience in elementary school, 3rd grade material | is repeated ad nauseum in 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade. | Plenty of time to get it. (Being an Air Force brat, I | attended 3 different elementary schools, even one in | Germany run by the military. All the same.) | tedd4u wrote: | A great deal of research has gone into just this concept, | often called "mastery-based learning." Sal Khan is one | well-known proponent (look for the requisite TED talk). | jimbokun wrote: | How does a teacher instruct a class where every single | student is learning something different at a given time, | based on their progress up to that point? | Negitivefrags wrote: | I went to a tiny mixed age school and basically each kid | worked on workbooks at their own pace. | | The older kids helped out the younger ones and the | teacher walked around the class and talked to each kid to | help them along with thier work if they got stuck. | | There wasn't any lecture style teaching with the teacher | explaining concepts to the whole class at once. | | We all worked on one subject at a time, but we were all | at different points in it. | | When my family moved and I left that school I was | multiple years ahead of where I was supposed to be in | several subjects and normal school was very boring after | that. | analog31 wrote: | This is a good point, but it highlights the fact that | classroom education is a compromise -- economic and | social -- and not a moral standard. Thus I think we | should at least be conscious of its limitations, even if | we can't immediately do anything about them. | rahimnathwani wrote: | It is hard! | | But the folks making decisions about education in | California (including the authors of the California Math | Framework 2021) believe they'll achieve better outcomes | that way, than they will by grouping students based on | their progress in the subject. | | I heard recently from a 6th grade math teacher who has | students who are 1, 2, 3 and even 4 grades behind. | | Imagine orchestrating a single class in which you're | teaching some children about adding single-digit numbers, | and others about long division. | 6gvONxR4sf7o wrote: | Sorry, I tried to be clear that that scenario is an | unrealistic ideal. Ideal in the sense of a spherical | frictionless student in a vacuum with infinite funding as | well as ideal in the sense of good. In that case one | solution would be more teachers than students. | | Unless/until we figure out a feasible way to make | progress not the same pace for everyone, progress will | have to be the same pace for everyone. | | Colleges have a decent middle ground where if you fail | this quarter, there are decent odds your class will be | offered again before next year, especially for the | earlier classes that really need stricter sequencing. But | that's only really feasible when you have that many | students (not to mention tuition $$$). | ipaddr wrote: | Why do we have grades at all? Every year you progress to the | next year. At the end of high school everyone takes a SAT | test and they go to colleges. | | If you school kept telling you you were doing okay when you | weren't you will do poorly on the sat test or poorly in your | first year and be forced to dropout. | | I think these policies push the unpleasantness to the future | where it is too late to fix it. | jimbokun wrote: | Well, now many are looking to ban the SAT as well. | rcpt wrote: | Also in the name of equity the UCs are now ignoring the SAT | ipaddr wrote: | Doesn't that mean they fail first year instead? | jimmaswell wrote: | This short story shows where we're headed with things | like this: http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html | bushbaba wrote: | You can ban the sat and grades and still measure for | academic rigor. For example those who placed in a state | math competition are likely to have higher academic | abilities. Or those who had an article published in the | news...etc. | | All this does is make grades no longer a measure used. | And allow the wealthy to better position their kids at | the detriment of the middle class. | | California's strive to force outcome hurts the middle | class the most. I just don't get it. | dehrmann wrote: | > You can ban the sat and grades and still measure for | academic rigor | | It's harder to normalize performance across schools | without a standardized test. | | > those who placed in a state math competition are likely | to have higher academic abilities | | That sounds like a state-run math SAT that would have the | same problems. | | > And allow the wealthy to better position their kids at | the detriment of the middle class. | | The upper middle class is where it's actually | interesting. There aren't enough wealthy people for the | SAT to be a driver of mass inequality. They're already | sending their kids to elite private schools, so as long | as the Ivies keep favoring those schools, the status quo | remains. The most important thing you can to to prepare | for the SAT is do lots of practice tests. Those aren't | that expensive. Anyone working class or higher can afford | them. SAT classes help somewhat, but less than being | somewhat familiar with the test. They're moderately | expensive. Tutors are where it's interesting, and that's | in upper middle class territory. | WalterBright wrote: | > The most important thing you can to to prepare for the | SAT is do lots of practice tests. | | Oh phooey. I never prepared for the SATs, and nobody I | knew did, either. (Back in the 70s.) | | Wanna know how to do well on the SATs? Pay attention in | school to readin, ritin, and rithmetic. | | As for SAT prep books, I see them all the time in the | thrift store for a couple bucks. The notion that only the | wealthy have access to them is nonsense. | hellbannedguy wrote: | If I could have skipped high school, and went straight to a | community college, my life might have been different? | | I remember learning everything I should have in high school | in 1 semester at a CC. | | Plus--I found high school painful, and their was so much | wasted time. | | I was expected to work while going to high school, and | remember thinking there's got to be a better way. In school | all day felt like baby sitting, rather than learning. | | I went to three high schools. Two were public, and one | private. | | All a bit different. The private one had way too many kids on | drugs. | | If anyone has a responsible kid who is thinking about | dropping out, certain schools allow kids to go to CC early. | dnndev wrote: | High school should completely be optional. Those who want | to go will benefit from it and those who don't won't be | there to simply make trouble. | | Move the high school teachers to middle school and | elementary for smaller classes. | jollybean wrote: | It's not unreasonable. | | We don't want to fail kids consistently and put these huge | marks in their psyche because they were not 'good at some | thing'. | | HS needs to teach the basics of course, beyond that it should | be encouraged and supported. | | My personal academic inclination didn't even start turning on | seriously until I was very fortunate enough to get into a | good Grad School and the fraternal competition sparked | something I didn't know existed. | | Kicking kids out of school permanently is the best way to | make sure they end up on the streets, rugs, crimes gangs | etc.. | | The funny part of 'On-Campus' suspension is that ... 'On- | Campus' is the smartest thing in the article. Having to | actually show up for school is much worse than not being in | school! So that's a better 'punishment'. Maybe they should be | required to read a book! | | Guys like to focus on projects and applied things, I suggest | 1/2 of high school past age 15 should be applied learning, | projects. Literally anything that people engage with and | learn from. And as a non-athlete, terrible at sports klutz, I | would say 'gym class every day' would be ideal as well. 20% | 'training' type stuff and the rest just fun sports. | professoretc wrote: | > a kid can quickly dig themselves into a hole that they have | no | | > realistic way to get out of, e.g., by utterly bombing on an | exam | | > or missing a few assignments early in the semester. | | You've pretty much hit the nail on the head. The authors of | _Grading For Equity_ spoke at my school and the reasoning | they gave for eliminating 0-grading (i.e., not using 0 as the | lowest possible grade) was because it's basically impossible | to recover from. Ideally, a student who masters the material | by the end of class should get the _same_ grade as one who | masters it at the beginning; being fast or slow shouldn 't | factor into your grade, but with 0-grading, like you say, an | early test or assignment can tank your final grade, even if | your _knowledge_ eventually catches up to what it should be. | dragonwriter wrote: | > . The authors of _Grading For Equity_ spoke at my school | and the reasoning they gave for eliminating 0-grading | (i.e., not using 0 as the lowest possible grade) was | because it's basically impossible to recover from. | | It's easy to recover from if you don't use a stupid method | if aggregation, but that takes actually thinking about what | it is you are trying to measure; for instance, if you grade | by % in each of several competency areas throughout the | year, and have a final grade catehory standards | (cumulative, so you get the highest grade where you've met | all the standards): | | D: median of competency area medians meets minimum | proficiency standard | | C: median score within every competency area meets minimum | passing standard | | B: median of competency area medians meets high proficiency | standard or median in at least one competency area meets | excellence standard | | A: median of competency area medians exceeds excellence | standard | | (standards might be something like passing 70%, high | proficiency 80%, excellence 90%, but the exact numbers | aren't the point.) | | That will give you a measure of overall competence that | isn't particularly sensitive to outlier scores on a single | assignment, even if the assignment has components across | many competency areas. | nugget wrote: | Grades traditionally measure mastery of material on an | externally imposed timeline under some amount of externally | imposed pressure. I support moving to simply measuring | master of material in most cases, but it's important to | recognize that you lose some signal from those other areas. | In real life, sometimes it's better to maximize for mastery | regardless of timeline (within reason) while other times | it's better to maximize for the best job you can do within | a certain fixed amount of time. | listless wrote: | I support this. My kids have had a single zero on occasion | for a missed assignment and it demolished their grade. No | way to recover. This is not a good measurement of whether | you grasp the concepts. It's a good measurement of whether | you made no mistakes in the process. | kpozin wrote: | Seems like the simplest solution is to specify that the | lowest _n_ assignment or quiz grades will be dropped from the | overall grade calculation. I recall taking a few classes in | high school and college with such a policy. | mmarq wrote: | The point of school is not to produce geniuses, but to take a | mass of illiterates and turn them into semi-literate persons, | also giving them time to mature as human beings before they are | allowed into university or work. If an 18 year old person can | read, write, use basic math operations, know a few facts about | the country they live in and speak in a way that doesn't | require their fellow countrymen to use subtitles, we can call | it a success. If they can say what time is it in a foreign | language, they will end up in the school hall of fame. | | As a plus, school may introduce people to topics that may | interest them and then allow them to find their way in life: | from playing an instrument, to gymnastics, to computer | programming. | | Grades are a fixation of the school system and of all those | involved, but they don't measure knowledge accurately. Some | companies may not hire you if you have low marks or studied in | a less than prestigious school/university, but that has not | necessarily anything to do with knowledge and is likely to have | something to do with class segregation. So there's a point in | making them up. | | Vandalism being tolerated is instead a very serious issue the | school should address. | somethingor wrote: | > can read, write, use basic math operations, know a few | facts about the country they live in and speak in a way that | doesn't require his fellow countrymen to use subtitles | | This seems achievable by the 8th grade. | HDMI_Cable wrote: | Yeah, by this metric, school should stop when kids are 12. | rizzom5000 wrote: | It raises the question, what are we getting for our money | (in the US)? | | > In 2017, the United States spent $14,100 per full-time- | equivalent (FTE) student on elementary and secondary | education, which was 37 percent higher than the average | of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development | (OECD) member countries... | https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cmd | shagie wrote: | Part of this is in having schools bearing the brunt of | other failures in society or by having schools be the | ones trying to _solve_ those issues. | | Schools are often the safety net for youths with a wide | range of problems. While schools are the catch all for | such problems, they're more expensive than fixing _other_ | issues like fair wages for the parents of the students | (e.g. having hischoolers needing to get a job to support | the family rather than study for school). | | This high price tag is the result of shifting around | other issues to the place where they're inefficiently | handled. | | --- | | The flip side of this is the "schools are often funded by | property taxes and areas that are able to collect more | taxes are able to spend significantly more per student | even if it doesn't result in a better outcome." Many of | these areas already _have_ good student outcomes and the | money is spent on on... whatever. | | Palo Alto spends $24.5k/student ( https://nces.ed.gov/ccd | /districtsearch/district_detail.asp?I... ). | | Wyoming county schools spends $11.5k ( https://nces.ed.go | v/ccd/districtsearch/district_detail.asp?S... ). | | When looking at those, compare the breakdown of revenue | sources. | | --- | | So, I'll say "no, we're not - but it's not the fault of | the schools." | mmarq wrote: | It does depend on what we mean by read and write. I don't | mean just recognizing letters and being able to reproduce | them. An adult should be able to read and understand an | article from a decent newspaper (say the Financial Times), | and write a 5 line summary. Definitely not all 12 year olds | can to do that and, I'd argue, a large fraction of adults | can't either. | yaitsyaboi wrote: | I think the 50% rule is okay. I get that it's annoying for the | students who tried and got a 55%. But I suspect that the kids | who would get score much less than a 50 are probably the least | engaged and most disruptive. | | If a 50 can keep them statistically in the game, with a chance | of turning it around and passing, that might be worth it. It's | similar logic to not giving life sentences. People with no hope | of a good outcome are harder to deal with. A kid with a 22% | average that you have to deal with for 12 more weeks must be a | nightmare. They have no incentive to try at all, or to let the | class proceed in an orderly wat. | refurb wrote: | You're cheating that kid. They're going to get pushed into | the next grade and fall further behind until they graduate | and can't do basic math. | yaitsyaboi wrote: | I don't think theres a school district in the country that | will advance a kid with a 50% average to the next grade. | Idk if there's some arcane No Child Left Behind provision | about kids who have been stuck for 3 years, but in general | a 50% is a no go. | | And it's not like you can get 50s all year and get a few | 80s and average it out. It takes a lot of really sustained | effort to come back from that. Most kids won't. But at | least it's mathematically possible for more of the year. | csa wrote: | > I don't think theres a school district in the country | that will advance a kid with a 50% average to the next | grade. | | You're half right. | | Most school districts won't let a student with a 50% | average pass. | | That said, teachers will be pressed to give extra points | for participation or extra credit or just to change the | scores to get said kid over a passing level. Some | teachers will do this unprompted just to make sure they | don't have to see the kid next year. | | Not to mention that there will undoubtedly be calls of | some sort of discrimination if failing grades are common | in any given teacher's class. | spangry wrote: | Because standards would hinder "equity" in educational | outcomes. The SF Board of Education recently voted to end | selective admissions for Lowell High School in favour of a | lottery, citing lack of diversity and "pervasive systemic | racism". | | The board positions are elected so these sorts of policies are | presumably what the people of San Francisco want. | mmarq wrote: | I don't know anything about this particular Lowell High | School, but selective admissions at the high school level | achieve excellency by filtering out "bad" students, which are | usually students from disadvantaged backgrounds. If a public | school is of very high quality, selecting 10 year olds at | random is not much less fair than choosing them based on | their grades or extracurricular activities or an essay. | Unless we assume that high grades, extracurricular activities | or essay tutoring are not correlated with family wealth. | | If certain demographics are heavily underrepresented (and I | don't know if it's the case here), either we must assume that | they are less smart (and so produce less "high school | material") or we must acknowledge that there is some form of | discrimination. The latter being almost certainly true, | lotteries and quotas don't look like the dumbest ideas. | yonran wrote: | Did you read the article? Yes, selective admissions filter | out "bad" students including the type of students who don't | care about school who hold back students who do care; the | problems of the article are virtually nonexistent at | Lowell. I don't think Lowell was particularly selective (I | think something like 50% of applicants get in) and there | were plenty of poor students (including myself) who | benefited from an academic public school that does have | both wealthy and non-wealthy students who care about | learning (as opposed to private and suburban schools which | definitely do discriminate on the basis of wealth/income). | | > either we must assume that they are less smart ... or we | must acknowledge that there is some form of discrimination | | The failure of schooling starts much earlier than the | admissions test, and it is wrong to infer from disparities | in test results that the test itself is racist (as the | ringleaders of the SF Board of Education assumed). | mmarq wrote: | > Did you read the article? Yes, selective admissions | filter out "bad" students including the type of students | who don't care about school who hold back students who do | care | | What do we do about these 10 year olds? We assume they | are not "high school" material and we put them in the | school for dumb kids? Do these 10 year old not care about | school because there is something intrinsically wrong | about them and so the school system can't do anything | about it? | | > The failure of schooling starts much earlier than the | admissions test, and it is wrong to infer from | disparities in test results that the test itself is | racist (as the ringleaders of the SF Board of Education | assumed). | | The admission test is not racist per se, but if it | results in, say, blacks not being admitted to an | institution, it exist in a framework that materially | enables racism. We are talking about a high-school, which | enrols 12 year olds to teach them basic trigonometry and | some basic notions of history and literature (in the best | case scenario) and not about Hydra hiring PhD candidates | to build a death ray. When properly motivated, everybody | with a 80+ IQ can succeed in high school, one may argue | that you could pick them at random. | TedDoesntTalk wrote: | > Do these 10 year old not care about school because | there is something intrinsically wrong about them | | Each child, like each adult, has different motivations in | life. Not all children are equally motivated for | schoolwork. | | > The admission test is not racist per se, but if it | results in, say, blacks not being admitted to an | institution, it exist in a framework that materially | enables racism | | No. You need to look at confounding variables, not just | race. It could be that a large percentage of black | children in this area come from poor families and must | therefore work part-time jobs after school instead of | studying. That's just one example of many possibilities. | "Correcting" the problem by putting these children into | this special school does nothing to change their poverty: | they still must work after school and can't study. And | that means they can't keep up with the other children in | this privileged school. Your solution is probably to make | the schoolwork easier and force everyone to suffer the | same fate. My solution is to give that family money so | their high school kid doesn't have to work to help | support his family. | | In reality, your solution is the one that gets chosen | because of the wokeness movement. | tolbish wrote: | What kind of 10 year old is in high school and works a | part time job? | mmarq wrote: | > Each child, like each adult, has different motivations | in life. Not all children are equally motivated for | schoolwork. | | Ok, but you haven't answered my question | | > No. You need to look at confounding variables, not just | race. It could be that a large percentage of black | children in this area come from poor families and must | therefore work part-time jobs after school instead of | studying. That's just one example of many possibilities. | "Correcting" the problem by putting these children into | this special school does nothing to change their poverty: | they still must work after school and can't study. And | that means they can't keep up with the other children in | this privileged school. Your solution is probably to make | the schoolwork easier and force everyone to suffer the | same fate. My solution is to give that family money so | their high school kid doesn't have to work to help | support his family. | | Children not being able to write a good essay when they | are 10 because they have to work, is quite a degenerate | case and I hope it is not the norm for those who are not | admitted at this special school. The majority of 10-year- | old kids, who aren't employed in violation of child | labour laws, are smart enough to attend highschool | without the need to make schoolwork easier. | | > In reality, your solution is the one that gets chosen | because of the wokeness movement. | | This wokeness movement is not something I'm familiar with | or affiliated to. | WalterBright wrote: | If we do not take advantage of the more capable students | because of equity, what will the future be without people | who can do the sorts of things that require highly capable | individuals? | | No iphones, electric cars, or covid vaccines, for example. | | Even the communists realized that when you've got smart | students, take advantage and educate them as best you can. | | The third reich idiotically drove out their best | scientists, who wound up enthusiastically working for the | Allies developing the technology that defeated the reich. | mmarq wrote: | > If we do not take advantage of the more capable | students because of equity, what will the future of the | country be without people who can do the sorts of things | that require highly capable individuals? | | > No iphones, electric cars, or covid vaccines, for | example. | | Do we have any data on the correlation between high- | school admission criteria and inventing the Covid vaccine | or whatever? | | We are not talking about taking advantage of excellence, | which starts to become visible after highschool. We are | talking about 10-year-olds who go to school to be taught | the fundamental theorem of arithmetics. | | > Even the communists realized that when you've got smart | students, take advantage and educate them as best you | can. > The third reich idiotically drove out their best | scientists, who wound up working for the Allies | developing the technology that defeated the reich. | | I don't know what the communists and the nazists have to | do with changing the admission criteria of a high school. | I suppose it's a way of expressing disagreement in | American English? | WalterBright wrote: | > Do we have any data on the correlation between high- | school admission criteria and inventing the Covid vaccine | or whatever? | | Caltech requires good grades as criteria for admission. | Caltech graduates have a disproportionately high | percentage of Nobel prizes. | | https://www.caltech.edu/about/legacy/awards-and- | honors/nobel... | | BTW, I think the mRNA vaccine technology is worthy of a | Nobel Prize. Don't you? | mmarq wrote: | > Caltech requires good grades as criteria for admission. | Caltech graduates have a disproportionately high | percentage of Nobel prizes. | | Caltech requires 10-year-old kids to write essays? | | Again, are we talking about enrolling 10-year-old kids in | highschool or are we talking about hiring | microbiologists? | akomtu wrote: | What's "equity" in this context, btw? Equal outcome? | staticassertion wrote: | Is there any evidence at all that AP classes and high | GPAs leads to success, when controlling for other | variables? | nverno wrote: | GPA should be a result of mastering the material. | Assuming that is roughly the case, if you ever go on to | use any of the skills you were supposed to learn in | school (math, computing, etc) you are asking if having | learned those skills would help you perform those skills? | | I doubt there will ever be a way to satisfactorily | control for other variables when it comes to these sorts | of real-life studies (there is a reason the majority of | social science isn't reproducible[1]) | | [1] https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/7/21/eabd1705 | staticassertion wrote: | So the answer is no. | nverno wrote: | I would lean more towards this is one of those truths | that can be taken as self-evident. But, at the same time | I would be skeptical that any published evidence would | account for the infinitude of confounding factors. | | My guess is it is similar to IQ results - does a good job | weeding out people who know nothing, but does worse | differentiating between students who are satisfactory and | those who are exceptional | staticassertion wrote: | AFAIK there's more evidence supporting that ~B students | are the most successful vs A students. | Talanes wrote: | >GPA should be a result of mastering the material. | | I know that personally my grades don't tend to correlate | with my actual knowledge at all. I've failed things | because I've been bored with them, and I've gotten | perfect grades on things I don't understand at all | outside the tested material. | nverno wrote: | Same, I think this is the assumption that doesn't always | hold up. However, it often does, and how well it does | depends on the teachers and school. | [deleted] | lubujackson wrote: | This kind of narrow thinking is what has caused schools in | SF to suck for everyone. Because Lowell doesn't exist in a | vacuum and the arguments that privileged people have a leg | up doesn't really make a difference - it is similar logic | to burning libraries because some folks can't read. | | So what happens when you dumb down the only decent public | high school for students to aim for? The parents have three | options: send your kid to school where they learn nothing | (maybe get a tutor and self-learn?), send them to a private | high school which costs north of $50k/year in SF (some are | more like $65k... and that is IF you can get in!), or you | move somewhere else. But there has been a country-wide | effort to dumb down public schools combined with softer | discipline (thanks to lawsuit fears), so you might simply | end up at a private school anyway. | | Add this together and you can see how pushing equitable | results by attacking merit-based options only widens class | and economic divides. | Talanes wrote: | >So what happens when you dumb down the only decent | public high school for students to aim for? | | Vast swaths of the country get by without having any | choices in high schools. The idea that need a selection | of different schools with different levels of prestige | and focuses is such an urban entitlement. | mmarq wrote: | > So what happens when you dumb down the only decent | public high school for students to aim for? | | Changing the admission criteria of a highschool is not | akin to burning libraries. | | > So what happens when you dumb down the only decent | public high school for students to aim for? | | Changing the admission criteria of a highschool is not | the same as dumbing it down (whatever that is supposed to | mean). In Europe children are not required to write essay | or complete extracurricular activities to enroll in | highschools or middleschools, and they are not generally | dumber than the Americans. | | > Add this together and you can see how pushing equitable | results by attacking merit-based options only widens | class and economic divides. | | The admission criteria of a highschool do not necessarily | reward merit. They are more likely to reward having been | tutored on how to write highschool admission essays. | rahimnathwani wrote: | There is an effort underway to recall members of the SFBOE: | | https://www.recallsfschoolboard.org/ | | There is a father who has been out every weekend collection | collecting petitions. On one occasion, someone tried to | thwart the attempt by stealing some of the petitions. | | Even though there is clear video evidence and the public has | identified the man, the police haven't arrested him, and SF | politicians have not even mentioned the act. (Folks informed | his employer, and he was fired.) | | I find this situation baffling. | adamredwoods wrote: | I am baffled why they are doing a recall? According to the | site, the main reason states because their kids have not | gone back to school. To me, that's not a good enough reason | for a recall (recalls cost money). Public schools are under | state and county health guidance. | rahimnathwani wrote: | The board could have opened schools months ago, but chose | not to. | | The board opened some schools for a single day at the end | of the school year, just to qualify for state funding to | pay teachers. | | The board spent time (whilst schools were closed) | deciding how to rename schools, something which has zero | impact on educational outcomes. | | The board has a member who made racist remarks on Twitter | and, despite not losing her position, is suing the school | board: https://missionlocal.org/2021/03/alison-collins- | school-board... | | These are other reasons to be dissatisfied. | | More concerning to some people is that becoming a member | of the SFBOE is a common launching point for the SF Board | of Supervisors. | hellbannedguy wrote: | The teachers were worried about Covid. | | Kids weren't vaccinated. | ALittleLight wrote: | Kids don't need to be vaccinated. Adults who are | concerned about it, including teachers, should be. | Keeping schools closed because children aren't vaccinated | is irrational. | dragonwriter wrote: | > Kids don't need to be vaccinated. | | A large unvaccinated reservoir population in constant | contact with the vaccinated population is how you breed | variants that are, e.g., more dangerous to young people | (like Delta already is) and more likely to break through | existing vaccines (which Delta also is, though not | intensely so from the information I've seen.) | saiya-jin wrote: | What the heck are you talking about? Brazil variant for | example is pretty brutal on kids, death is not so | uncommon result. School is one of the worst places for | spreading, since tons of kids lack will/discipline to | behave consistently, and are cramped in various classes. | Once 1 member of household is sick, the chance rest will | get it is pretty high. | | Remote teaching sucks for many reasons for kids and | should be used only when _really_ unavoidable, but to | claim kids are a-OK and shouldn 't be vaccinated ain't | based on science I've read so far. | yonran wrote: | The San Francisco Board of Education have made many | displays of incompetence and malice this past year which | have been covered by both local and national media. | | During the pandemic, the Board of Education announced | that 44 schools were named after oppressors (many were | justified, but the names committee also made numerous | errors) and that principals and families needed to come | up with new names for their schools over Zoom. Board | member Gabriela Lopez defended even the egregious | mistakes, demonstrating that she only cares about | "uplifting" and "holding" people of color but not facts | https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-san-francisco- | ren... Unfortunately, Lopez is not up for recall yet, but | her enablers are. | | Alison Collins led the resolution to remove academic | admissions to San Francisco's magnet high school Lowell | High. But instead of debating the pros and cons of having | a magnet school, she caricatured the school as bed of | "toxic racism" and dismissed the Asian parents who | supported an admissions criteria as "a bunch of racists". | https://twitter.com/sfchronicle/status/131658276095433113 | 6?l... Afterwards, people discovered her previous tweets | stereotyping Asians and her pattern of abusing her power | (https://twitter.com/hknightsf/status/1391039211747172352 | ). When her colleagues selected a different Vice | President, she lashed out with a lawsuit calling her | opponents racists | (https://missionlocal.org/2021/04/alison-collins-strange- | and-...) | | The other board members haven't done anything offensive | but haven't shown any leadership either. They just | enabled the radicals. We don't know exactly why SFUSD | didn't open the schools this year (negotiations were | behind closed doors), but I suspect it has to do with the | board members' extreme deference to the teachers' union | that endorsed them. | | I encourage anyone who is a San Francisco citizen to | print out the recall petitions and mail them in | https://recallsfschoolboard.org/ | | See also this explainer The Case for Recalling the School | Board https://www.engardio.com/blog/school-board-recall- | case | vladvasiliu wrote: | This looks like a classic "what gets measured gets managed". | | If they have objectives like "X% of kids have to graduate", | then either you improve the kids' skills, or you lower the | requirements for graduation. | | For example, in France, the recent governments are extremely | happy of the improvement in baccalaureate's success rate (the | exam at the end of high-school). | | They never talk about the level, but older folks, who sat these | exams a few decades ago, always lament that the courses have | been dumbed down. Of course the government doesn't agree, but | why would it? | Yoric wrote: | For context: "recent governments" == "every government since | 1981", iirc. | CapitalistCartr wrote: | I learned more in two months of USAF Basic Training than any year | of school, maybe any two years. | | As they told us repeatedly, it's a privilege to be here. Although | they had the option to boot us out, no one was, and only one guy | bailed out of 50. | nerdponx wrote: | This sounds like something out of a surrealist novel. | | > consistently use umlauts in place of quotation marks and acute | accent marks in place of apostrophes | | US-International keyboard layout, maybe. Maybe the student | doesn't know what umlauts and acute accents are, so maybe they | think they're valid equivalents to " and '. | fzimmermann89 wrote: | or the text went through latex at some point, which can easily | lead to a"->a. | | letter+quotation mark is a common way to write umlauts... | rjsw wrote: | Is that down to the pupil ? | | Sounds like another MacOS "why not use random unicode | characters that look similar to the one you really want" | feature to me. | underseacables wrote: | This is sad. It reads more as though teachers and school | employees are doing whatever they can to keep/justify their jobs, | but not to improve learning. It is almost as if a teachers first | job is self-preservation. If students can't pass the test, then | the test must be made easier, that way more students can pass and | the teacher doesn't look bad. | MattGaiser wrote: | > It is almost as if a teachers first job is self-preservation. | | That is simply the top priority of most employees. | an_opabinia wrote: | > Most teachers seem to take it as a given that of course half | the class is going to wander in half an hour late during first | period-- it's so early, you know!-- and during fourth period | | I don't know. What does this have to do with keeping teacher's | jobs and not improving learning? Late start is, as far as | "clinical outcomes" can be measured in education, like, the | cheapest win there is. | brandmeyer wrote: | That's an incentive alignment problem. It is the responsibility | of management (state and district admin) to ensure that what is | best for the teacher's career is also what is best for student | education. | underseacables wrote: | But which comes first, the teachers career, or the students | education? I would contend that in the available evidence it | is the former. | Wistar wrote: | Teacher's choice of curriculum and how, and when, subjects | are taught are ever more regimented and regulated. | P0l83q4p1Hw3Ul wrote: | Who's responsibility is it to ensure that what is best for | the management (state and district admin) is also what is | best for student education? | | I'm not too familiar with the details of management here, but | is it even possible for public schools (and other government | operations) to have proper incentives given voters don't care | about results? I suppose "school-choice", which happens to be | vehemently opposed by Democrats, would be the only way. | marcinzm wrote: | Parents who have money and care enough already pick the | schools by simply buying a house in a slightly different | place. Cupertino used to be the hot place for tiger parents | in the bay area to go but I'm not sure if it still is. The | issue is that then the rest of the schools get even worse | which eventually results in bad social issues in 20 years. | The kids from those schools grow up and everyone has to | deal with them. | schoolchoice wrote: | "School-choice" is great for optimizing local maximums at | the expense of just about everyone else. Public education | should focus on the lowest common denominators to maximize | education per tax dollar. It's not the smart people with | lack of opportunity that drag down society, it's the | massive amount of undereducated adults that become | dangerously suceptable to manipulation. | fallingknife wrote: | If you want to maximize education per tax dollar then you | need to separate out the smart kids into their own | schools. Benefits of education are not evenly | distributed. It is heavily weighted towards the right | tail. | JackFr wrote: | Not clear what your argument against school choice is. | | Not sure what you mean by "optimizing local maximums at | the expense of everything else". It almost sounds like an | argument but there's no substance. | | You claim that public education should focus on the | lowest common denominator so we can avoid an underclass | susceptible to manipulation. That's both a weak | justification to purposely damage public education and | condescension shown by elites when poor people don't vote | the way "they should". | mobilefriendly wrote: | School choice is still universal public education. It is | just the government providers of education have to | compete with private providers. | sxg wrote: | That may be true--the system may be better served by | raising the floor on education. But voters are | individuals, and the most passionate are likely the type | of people who prioritize maximizing their own (smart) | kids' opportunities over raising the floor for everyone. | hypersoar wrote: | School vouchers aren't really about aligning incentives. | They're a backdoor to having the public fund the religious | schools comprising a large majority of private schools. | titanomachy wrote: | It's probably a bit more complicated than that... if failure | rates went way up because of COVID, it would probably be an | honest representation of how little students learned, but it | would also screw over a lot of kids and affect their futures. | It's not really their fault that society didn't adapt well. | | I'm not saying they're right to just pass everyone, but it | might not be purely selfish on the part of administrators. | LanceH wrote: | I would say most _teachers_ pass students so hell doesn 't rain | down upon them in the form of administrators, parents, and the | school district/city itself. | [deleted] | Yoric wrote: | Let's rephrase this. | | If you had a choice between: | | a. doing your job as well as you can, then losing it (and being | unemployable forever, quite likely); | | b. doing it somewhat worse, but keeping it (and hopefully | having a chance to help more students). | | What would you do? | | Please blame whoever forced this conundrum on teachers. | Nonsensical bureaucratic decisions like this are the reason for | which I left the profession. | KingMachiavelli wrote: | I thought AP classes and a level of general competitiveness | stopped stuff like this? | | Even if the in person classes are easy to pass, the AP scores | should be consistent with the rest of the country and should make | identifying the relative difficulty between schools pretty easy? | ACT and SAT should also make grade inflated school very easily to | spot. | | I think California has a rule requiring that at least X% of their | students are from California right? Has that shifted the balance | at CA to accepting lower quality students from their own state? | almost_usual wrote: | UC schools no longer consider SAT or ACT for admissions or | scholarships. | | https://admission.universityofcalifornia.edu/admission-requi... | nixpulvis wrote: | > "you're legally required to assign this much homework, so make | sure you do that, only don't, because the kids are overwhelmed". | That too was in keeping with a theme. | | I think the underlying theme is that the parents themselves are | overwhelmed and the schools that were ill-equipped to handle | education before COVID-19 are crumbling. | | If I take this report at face value (which, frankly, I'm tempted | to), it paints an even more broken image of the American school | system than the dumpster fire I had on my wall already. | jl2718 wrote: | Just say no to this garbage. Your kids will only learn how to be | like them. | jdhn wrote: | Stuff like this is why I roll my eyes every time I hear that | schools are underfunded and how we need to give them just a | little more funding, and surely things will get better. If | they're just going to pass students anyways, what's the point of | increasing the funding? | kyboren wrote: | That trope needs to die. California's schools are _not_ | underfunded. California spends a record amount on education[0], | over $18k per child. | | "Reflecting the changes to Proposition 98 funding levels noted | above, total K-12 per-pupil expenditures from all sources are | projected to be $18,837 in 2020-21 and $18,000 in 2021-22--the | highest levels ever (K-12 Education Spending Per Pupil). The | decrease between 2020-21 and 2021-22 reflects the significant | allocation of one-time federal funds in 2020-21." | | [0]: | www.ebudget.ca.gov/2021-22/pdf/BudgetSummary/K-12Education.pdf | mobilefriendly wrote: | As a nation, US inflation adjusted, per-student K-12 spending | has tripled since the 1960s. | TMWNN wrote: | New York City spends more per student than anywhere else in the | US (<https://www.silive.com/news/2019/06/how-much-does-new- | york-c...>). Baltimore, an incredibly poor and run-down city, | spends the third most. #4-6 and #8 are all wealthy suburbs of | Washington DC, but their schools are all far better than those | of Baltimore or NYC on average, despite Baltimore spending | slightly more per student and NYC spending 60-70% more. | bradlys wrote: | I mean, my school where I went could only afford four days a | week. We had so many budget cuts that the school decided the | only way to go forward was to cut the fifth day. This lasted | for years and I don't know if they've ever returned to a normal | schedule. | pydry wrote: | maybe because this isn't the only problem schools have and some | of them absolutely will be fixed by money. | P0l83q4p1Hw3Ul wrote: | Not quite as good as this one: | | https://www.amren.com/features/2020/05/after-twenty-years-wo... | | I'm a bit surprised that the Bay Area, one of the wealthiest | places in the world, has problems with public schools too. | "Public schooling is child abuse" gains more steam every day. | astrange wrote: | California can't fund any of its public schools properly | because of Prop 13. None of the wealthy homeowners care about | this, because they're all too old to have kids in school. | unishark wrote: | Prop 13 protects people who got in early. Median house prices | in SF have been over a million for close to a decade. I'd | think they have plenty enough suckers by now paying five- | figures in property taxes. | astrange wrote: | The problem more applies to poorer places like EPA than SF. | AFAIK the main problem with SF public schools is nobody | wants to use them because they'll assign you to one across | the city. | mistrial9 wrote: | you are utterly wrong here -- public school have gotten, do | get, and will get, massive boatloads of money in most urban | areas of California. There are many layers of money-consumers | in each school system, especially in the Bay Area. | fallingknife wrote: | It's not clear to me how SF, the richest city in the country | with the lowest percentage of children, and that charges an | income tax on residents, doesn't have hands down the best | public schools in the country. | pjscott wrote: | They certainly have money, but money doesn't seem to be the | problem here. None of the things that the article talks | about have any obvious connection with school funding, but | with the culture of the school and how it's run. If the | school's budget doubled tomorrow, for example, they still | wouldn't be able to give a grade less than 50% because they | would still have a policy forbidding it. | | (I went to a tiny rural elementary school located between a | tractor supply store and a goat pen. Three teachers taught | six grades, two grades per classroom. Compared to the SF | schools, it was incredibly under-resourced -- and yet it | was a Good School, academically much higher-performing. I | think about this sometimes when people point at money as | obviously the reason why Johnny can't read.) | P0l83q4p1Hw3Ul wrote: | It's not clear to me how funding plays a leading role in | policies such as "let everyone pass". | astrange wrote: | Don't ask me, I was responding to "one of the wealthiest | places in the world". Though I think schools with rich | enough families attending do have attached foundations and | just ask for charitable donations. | | The easiest way to live in the area as a schoolteacher is | to marry an engineer or someone else with a home, too. | rcpt wrote: | Well, if you're an HJTA fanboy then you can justify any | sickening anti education policy you want by pointing to | "let everyone pass" | P0l83q4p1Hw3Ul wrote: | To be clear I've never heard of HJTA. | | Letting schools continue to suck with the excuse that | they just need more funding is the sickening anti- | education policy. | | Yes, an organization that is shitty due to bad policies | won't improve, and might become worse, when given more | funding. | [deleted] | mediumdeviation wrote: | > American Renaissance (AR or AmRen) is a white supremacist | website and former monthly magazine publication founded and | edited by Jared Taylor. | | > The publication promotes pseudoscientific notions "that | attempt to demonstrate the intellectual and cultural | superiority of whites and publishes articles on the supposed | decline of American society because of integrationist social | policies." | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Renaissance_(magazine... | P0l83q4p1Hw3Ul wrote: | Does that subtract from the value of the article? | | The question one might ask is, "did the author write this | because they're racist, or are they just sharing their | experience and no one else would dare publish it?" | | Given there are multiple ways of verifying the details, I'd | go with "just sharing their experience". | brighton36 wrote: | You can know the enlightenment is over, when you read | summaries like this. When we choose social proximity to | (evil thing) over veracity of content, you can see how | tribalism forms, in lieu of meritocracy. | | The truth is probably racist. That's how the ship goes | down. | geofft wrote: | It's p-hacking for prejudice, though. | | Let's say that there are two races, orange and blue. Alice | is orange and goes to a majority-blue church and gets | mistreated because of her race. Bob is blue and goes to a | majority-orange church and gets mistreated because of his | race. | | Alice and Bob are both upset about their experiences. They | submit articles to "The American Truth," an orange- | supremacist newspaper whose stated mission is to convince | orange people that they'll never be happy in a society | where blue people are treated as equals. Naturally, they | publish Alice's article and not Bob's. | | Carol is orange and goes to a different majority-blue | church and things are totally fine; Dan is blue and goes to | a different majority-orange church and things are also | totally fine. Eve, who is orange, and Mallory, who is blue, | both go to the same church which has a good mix of folks | from the two races, and they love it. "The American Truth" | is of course totally uninterested in hearing any of these | stories. | | If you read "The American Truth," you'll think that there's | a problem with blue people being intolerant, and you won't | be aware of problems with orange people being intolerant, | nor will you be aware that, quite possibly, these are both | exceptional cases and most orange people and blue people | alike are quite tolerant and welcoming and they tend to get | along with each other. | P0l83q4p1Hw3Ul wrote: | I like your explanation, but it seems you're arguing in | favor of reading "The American Truth", since it will give | you both perspectives if you're currently only reading | blue-supremacist newspapers? | | And you'll be fine as long as you recognize the biases on | both sides and verify claims. | geofft wrote: | Not really, because the blue-supremacist newspapers won't | publish any of the other perspectives - they're also | going to say that the blue man cannot survive in a | society with orange people. You won't hear any of the | stories where things are fine. | | The problem with p-hacking is you need to honestly report | the negative results too, not that you need to also find | "statistically significant" results reporting the | opposite effect. | | But yes, if you consciously make an effort to find | extremist sources from all possible points of view (and | in the real world, that's rarely the same as "both points | of view"), and if you make a point of reading them all | critically and skeptically, then that is likely to get | you a more balanced perspective about things on the | margins. Can you find a story about life as a black | teacher in a majority-white school published by a black | supremacist/separatist organization? | [deleted] | hypersoar wrote: | This is a racist screed. The only information available about | that author is that they write for the linked site, a well- | known white supremacist publication. | P0l83q4p1Hw3Ul wrote: | Only 2 articles by the author, so I wouldn't strongly | associate them with the site. | | No information about author, and published on a site like | that because such topics are forbidden, so I wouldn't say | that's a good tool for judging the truthfulness/quality. | | Have to look at the details and see if they align with what | is verifiable. | | Some of the claims can be verified by video footage that is | widely available online. Many people will still dispute those | claims. | vore wrote: | Ignoring the obvious white supremacist dogwhistling | completely littered throughout their article, they | literally allude to the 14 Words at the end! | | > But doing nothing means whites must condemn their own | flesh and blood to the nightmare I've described -- and we | have a duty to protect the future for our children. | P0l83q4p1Hw3Ul wrote: | I don't see how that subtracts from the value of the | claims that can be verified, just ignore biased claims | like any other media. | | I'm not familiar with the idea that it's bad for white | people to want a good future for their children? Seems | quite racist to me. | shoto_io wrote: | _> And the plagiarism detection software was indeed fooled! What | the student didn't realize is that teachers don't need software | to be able to tell the difference between honestly composed | sentences and computer-generated gibberish._ | | Hilarious. | linuxftw wrote: | Wow, lot's to unravel in this one. First, the kids are trying to | skip out on mindless work like book reports. Most of the students | aren't bright enough to fool the teacher in the anecdotes, but | probably there are some that do. | | Next, there's the discipline issue. Yes, they stopped suspending | kids in a lot of places because they realized those kids would | just be left alone at home all day, and the only reason those | kids were at school at all was because it was in some way | convenient for their parents. | | Finally, there's the homework issue. Yes, homeless is pointless | busy work. If something is worth learning, make sure you block | off enough time during classroom hours to teach it, otherwise | most kids aren't going to learn it at all. Yes, the students are | overwhelmed. | | We have millions of kids that are from completely broken homes, | basic needs like food and housing aren't met, and this person is | complaining about book reports? Society is broken. | newbie2020 wrote: | You think homework is useless? That's the main way to learn... | throwaway17_17 wrote: | I don't particularly agree with GP's comment, but homework is | not the main way everyone learns. Maybe some individuals do | learn that way, but others absolutely do not. I personally | did not do a single homework assignment other than a senior | term paper throughout all of high school and still learned | the material presented. I think it's too broad to just assert | that homework == 'way to learn'. | LeegleechN wrote: | Actually doing the material (as opposed to sitting in a | lecture) is the way to learn, but that could be done in | class. | pacbard wrote: | > With half the term remaining, teachers of seniors received a | notification that they would not be allowed to fail students | unless they filled out a form right then and there declaring that | the student was certain to receive an F. | | I think that OP is misconstruing the reasons behind this | notification requirement. This notification has to do more with a | "cover your ass" policy than lowering expectations for seniors. | | The California Education code [1] requires school districts to | develop procedures to notify parents of a failing grade. All the | CA districts that I worked for had some procedures in place for | when and how notify families of failing grades in response to | this law. From a quick search, it seems that SFUSD policies 4.2.5 | [2] and 4.2.6 apply in this case. The policy clearly states that | teachers have to notify parents of grades either 1 or 2 times | during the semester (i.e., mid-semester report cards-if you went | to school in CA you will remember receiving those). | | It seems that OP's school was on a 9-week reporting period, | requiring teachers to notify parents of grades mid-semester and | that their school added a requirement of filling out an | additional form outlining that the student was in danger of | failing the class specifically for seniors (probably because most | families stopped looking at report cards for seniors). This form | is required to be in compliance with the CA ed code as parents | have the right to appeal failing grades and not being notified is | probably an enough reason for the district to change a failing | grade to a passing one in case of a lawsuit/complaint. | | I would imagine that failing a class is more "high stakes" for | seniors than other students, so they have more paperwork involved | for seniors if you want to fail them. Families might be more | "litigious" if a student ends up failing a class required for | graduation. It is simpler to complain to the board/suing that | having to repeat a school year. | | The bottom line is that the CA ed code gives teachers final say | in grades and even the superintendent cannot change a grade | without the teacher's consent. On the other hand, the CA ed code | gives some rights to parents to appeal grades and has some | notifications guidelines so they shouldn't be surprised of | failing grades. OP will be able to fail as many seniors as they | want, but they just have to notify their families that they are | in danger of failing the class at some point before the end of | the semester. At the end of the day, if they have enough evidence | for failing a student (that would stand up during a public board | meeting/lawsuit), notifying the student's family 9 weeks before | the end of the semester shouldn't be too much of a burden. | | Links: | | [1]: | https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio.... | [2]: ]https://www.sfusd.edu/services/know-your-rights/student- | fami... | jessriedel wrote: | > This form is required to be in compliance with the CA ed code | as parents have the right to appeal failing grades and not | being notified is probably an enough reason for the district to | change a failing grade to a passing one in case of a | lawsuit/complaint. | | If this were the reason for the new forms, why would the school | only have teachers fill out the form if the student were | _guaranteed_ to fail? I 'd think the schools would go the | opposite direction and make sure to notify all parents whose | kids _might_ fail. | pacbard wrote: | I dug up SFUSD board policy [1] around failing notifications. | The policy reads: | | "Whenever it becomes evident to a teacher that a student is | in danger of failing a course, the teacher shall arrange a | conference with the student's parent/guardian or send the | parent/guardian a written report. The refusal of the parent | to attend the conference, or to respond to the written | report, shall not preclude failing the pupil at the end of | the grading period. (Education Code 49067)" | | The policy clearly states that the student has to be "in | danger of failing a course" and not "guaranteed to fail a | course". But, if a teacher knows that they might fail a | student, they must notify parents by some reasonable deadline | (again, it seems that OP's school sets it by week 9 of the | semester or by the mid-semester mark). Without this | notification, they might not be able to fail a student | because they weren't in compliance with the CA ed code and | district policy. This becomes even more of an issue when HS | graduation is concerned. | | I don't know if the forms are new or not. The policy was last | updated in 2017 so they are at least 4 years old. What what | is worth, I filled out similar forms when I was a teacher 10 | years ago in another part of CA, so I suspect that they have | been around for longer than that (and the forms were mass | produced on carbon paper slips that seemed printed in the | 70s). I am also wondering if the word "guaranteed" came up in | response to COVID-related changes to grading policies and the | district having implemented a credit/no credit grading | system. | | Links: | | [1] Board policy 5121 cf. 6154 para. 4: https://go.boarddocs. | com/ca/sfusd/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=AKG... | rossdavidh wrote: | So, this seems ludicrous and sad. What I am wondering is whether | or not this is an accurate representation of the real situation | in SFBay area schools? If we have any parents from the SF Bay | area on HN who are sending their kids to public schools, I'd be | interested in hearing their take on this. | amha wrote: | I teach at an elite private school in the Bay. We're a much | better place than the school described here, with kids who like | learning, and administrators who are well-intentioned. But many | of the author's frustrations are, directionally, exactly the | same as what I experience, namely: | | > .. The emails sent to me personally from counselors and | administrators have overwhelmingly broken down along these | lines: such-and-such a student is feeling stressed, so please | excuse her from this set of assignments. This other student | gets nervous about taking tests or giving presentations or | working in groups, so please excuse him from work of those | types. ... my direct supervisor repeatedly demanded that I pace | my classes for the benefit of the single student in each | section who was struggling the most, which quite literally | would have meant putting students who had signed up for | Advanced Placement into a remedial course | bob1029 wrote: | I have 2 close family members working public education in Texas | - one is a principal and another a teacher. Stories like this | are brought up all the time. Something really shitty is going | on with how we are raising a lot of our kids and managing | public school systems. It's not specific to one | state/county/region from what I can tell. | | My brother in particular is desperately trying to get out of | public education. He loves teaching, but they are making it | impossible for anyone to do their jobs effectively. Pay is | shit, especially since work practically doubled overnight, and | you get virtually zero control over the curriculum or policies | in your classroom. | | Then, at the end of the day, some entitled shithead of a parent | thinks their little snowflake was dealt a bad hand and parent- | teacher conferences ensue which further sap whatever life force | remains. | | After hearing about all of this stuff over the years, I cant | help but feel incredibly grateful that I have the kind of | career that I do. Public education has been turned into a | protracted daycare experience with the sole objective of piping | the students into a college debt lifestyle. | mindvirus wrote: | One of the most radical beliefs I have is we should get rid of | private schools, because it lets the people most capable of | forcing change to opt out of an increasingly broken system, and | so it doesn't get fixed. | | Of course I say this as I seriously consider sending my kids to a | private school because of articles like this. | rcpt wrote: | > lets the people most capable of forcing change to opt out of | an increasingly broken system, and so it doesn't get fixed. | | I don't think voting homeowner retirees sitting on fat Prop 13 | tax cuts are going to change their tune because their grandkids | can't go to private school. | bushbaba wrote: | Majority of education budget goes to paying for pensions of | retirees. | | There's no budget shortage. There's a mis use of funds. If | you throw more money into the system we'll just see even | crazier pension packages and administration staff overheads. | mindvirus wrote: | I doubt that these problems are from a lack of funding. | | From a systems point of view though - why would businesses | move to SF if it meant bad schools? The answer right now is | because the leadership can opt out and go into the private | system, but if that wasn't the case, I think there would be a | lot of incentive on the city to fix these problems. | tomjen3 wrote: | Alternatively we should ban public schools and force parents to | send them to a private school, which if the money that would | otherwise have gone to the public school gets sent along with | them isn't very expensive (here in Denmark something like | 80-90% of the money follows the student). | | Then we would have a direct way for parents to improve the | schools their kids attend. | zepto wrote: | > get rid of private schools | | What does that actually mean? It seems like you'd have to ban | homeschooling and severely curtail private tutoring too. | | The idea of the state providing basic schooling so that even | the poorest people start with at least some intellectual | capital and can participate in society seems like and a good | one. | | The idea of the state limiting what education is available to | everyone and making it illegal to try to organize education | outside of its direct authority seems maximally dystopian. | mindvirus wrote: | You're tearing down a straw man friend, I didn't say anything | about tutoring or homeschooling. | | It'd mean the same thing it already means for 90%+ people - | compulsory publicly funded education from 5-17 years old. | DoreenMichele wrote: | Or maybe you don't understand California law. Most | homeschooling families stay legal by registering as a | _private school._ | | Source: I homeschooled my sons in California for several | years and participated on various homeschooling lists at | the time. | zepto wrote: | > You're tearing down a straw man friend, I didn't say | anything about tutoring or homeschooling. | | No straw man involved. I don't think you've thought through | the implications of 'getting rid of private school'. | | The point is that to ban private schools you'd also have to | ban homeschooling. | chrisseaton wrote: | > The point is that to ban private schools you'd also | have to ban homeschooling. | | Why? | | You can homeschool your children if you want. | | They just have to be at state school during state school | hours like anyone else. So you'll have to homeschool in | your own time, like everything else you have to do in | your own time. | | (I'm not in favour of banning private schools, but your | argument doesn't make sense regardless.) | josho wrote: | It's my understanding that private schools play a minor | role in other countries. Those same countries also have | home schools. | | I don't quite understand how restricting a private school | of several hundred students affects a parent teaching | their children at home. | | Clearly rules could be in place to separate those | concerns apart. | stale2002 wrote: | The more likely result of your "solution" is that everyone | simple gets a worse education. | | Things are usually not solved by making things worse for | everyone. | | Instead, the solution, to most problems, is to try to help more | people, instead of trying to stop others from being too good at | educating their children. | rrss wrote: | FYI private schools are not immune to these problems. The | administration of some private schools choose to have similar | policies (accept late work indefinitely, minimum grade of 50%, | etc) at their school. | mindvirus wrote: | Of course, but it is very much up to the parents which | product they want to buy (another problem of private schools | to be sure). There are several that focus on rigorous | academics, language immersion and even world travel. | rkk3 wrote: | They don't necessarily know what is marketing and what they | are buying, and the few truly top schools are selective. | Private school teachers are also paid less & have worse | benefits. It would be great if the private system had it | all figured out but they don't. | amha wrote: | Teacher at an elite SFBay private high school. Can confirm! | verisimilidude wrote: | You're describing Finland. They outlawed private school funding | for exactly the reason you're proposing: to get the wealthiest | and most engaged parents invested in fixing public schools for | all. | | It worked. They have one of the best public education systems | in the world. | staticassertion wrote: | School's so stupid. If you give people a grade and tell them to | maximize it, with no meaningful rewards that they can understand, | they're going to cheat. Duh. I regret not cheating in school, | what a waste of time all of that shit was. | | The teacher is basically like "haha dumb kids, we know you're | cheating" and "if only we could punish students more!". There's a | lot of "the smart kids are suffering because of the dumb kids" | attitude here that I find disgusting. | | > That too was in keeping with a theme. The teacher email I | mentioned above was from one of the conference threads, but the | emails sent to me personally from counselors and administrators | have overwhelmingly broken down along these lines: such-and-such | a student is feeling stressed, so please excuse her from this set | of assignments. This other student gets nervous about taking | tests or giving presentations or working in groups, so please | excuse him from work of those types. | | Oh god, how awful that these students won't get to suffer through | some idiot's assignment that I'm sure would greatly better their | life. | | There's a lot wrong with school but I feel like this teacher | doesn't realize that they're a part of that. | | > Wow, a 100% pass rate! What a successful school! | | Yes, it's cheating. They have an incentive, as your students do, | to 'pass', and so they cheat. | | Give students a place to be during the day while their parents | work. Give them real, meaningful incentives that matter to young | people - money, freedom, social structure, a feeling of | productivity - and align those with learning real, practical | skills, like how to read, write, analyze context, etc. | | Hire non-idiots, pay them more, reduce class sizes. Yeah it'll | cost more, but the obvious economic benefits will offset that. I | can count on one hand how many teachers I had that I respected - | the rest were obvious failures. | um_ya wrote: | I like the school voucher idea a lot. | | Give parents a voucher, as good as cash, for their child and | let them choose the school. | | Private companies will compete for those vouchers, aligning | focus on satisfying the parents and the children, rather than | the government. | crooked-v wrote: | That sounds like a great way to indirectly punish parents who | can't afford commutes for their children, since they get | stuck with whichever schools the wealthier parents pull their | children from. | tastyfreeze wrote: | I cant help but think this is tied to the way government funding | for schools is handled. Schools dont want to lose funding by | having poor performance so the make the performance measures look | better. | mindvirus wrote: | In the balance, from talking to teachers a lot of students are | really struggling this year with COVID lockdowns, and so I wonder | to what extent this is to dampen that. I suspect most will be a | little bit behind next year, and it feels like we will have to | lean into that. | gregimba wrote: | During high school we had had an exchange program with a German | college track high school. My family hosted a student for a month | and then they hosted me in Germany. I was shocked at the | difference in expectations and quality of education compared to | an average American high school. I really wish we offered | something equivalent of their combination Vocational Tech/High | school with industry partnership as a viable career path compared | to the 4 year high school only option I had. | kowlo wrote: | It's sad but it's only going to get worse. UK universities are | already worse. | ivan_ah wrote: | Yeah I remember being very surprised at the undergraduate level | of math/phys at Bristol (I was there for one year on a student | exchange). My classmates (2nd year and 3rd year) had trouble | with basic calculus, because they didn't learn it in high | school, and then their first year courses had to go easy | (superficial) so that not everybody fails. The fact that you | choose which questions to answer on the finals is also weird | (answer any 3 out of 4 questions). | | It doesn't make sense to me that a whole nation skips math | (unless you take math A-levels). | | I talked to a professor and he explained UGRADs are below | level, but then when starting grad school they force everyone | up to international level. He showed me a huge room with grad | student desks and was like "look, we don't let them get out of | here until they learn math properly." | lordnacho wrote: | This school sounds like some sort of weird Kafkaesque punishment | for kids. Everyone is trying to game it: kids who don't want to | write essays, administrators who don't want kids to fail. | Teachers who want kids to both learn stuff and pass. | | Motivate the kids. Show them stuff about the world, and show them | how to find out things for themselves. If you're going to test | them, do it in a way that doesn't destroy all enjoyment of the | subject. Try to get the kids to want to keep learning after they | leave you. | dehrmann wrote: | No one's gaming anything; it's education theater. | rajansaini wrote: | In my experience anyone can be conditioned to love anything, | and inspiring a love for learning _something_ is the only | stable long-term solution. | hintymad wrote: | > And my direct supervisor repeatedly demanded that I pace my | classes for the benefit of the single student in each section who | was struggling the most | | All such effort in the name of equity will hurt the kids whose | families can't afford proper education. Eventually there will be | larger degree of inequity. The best students, namely the future | elites, will be okay, as they will find ways to educate | themselves one way or another. The worst students, those "single | student who struggled most", will be okay too, as they got all | the attention they need. It is unfortunately the students in the | middle, the backbone of our society, who would get hurt, like the | straight-A student reported by NYT who couldn't even pass city | college's math placement tests. Or the intern who just got fired | because he couldn't even understand that finding the values of | two variables needs a system of two independent equations. | pmichaud wrote: | This is terrifying. How representative is this actually? | xyzzyz wrote: | In public school systems of coastal liberal cities? Very | representative. | tastyfreeze wrote: | Im afraid it is widespread. My highschool in Alaska implemented | a graduation competency exam around 2000. Less than half my | class passed what I thought was an easy test. So... they made | next years test easier to meet the desired pass target. | nla wrote: | I would give this 10 votes if I could. Great read! | lightgreen wrote: | You can create 10 accounts if you think you deserve more votes | than others. | fitzie wrote: | if I was a teacher I would give an extra five points on any | handwritten assignment, and an extra ten points if it is cursive. | qihqi wrote: | Too easy to game. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvIvPARVRUQ | [deleted] | dnndev wrote: | Public school is broken and we all know it - in general. | | We need competent administrators, more teachers and smaller | classes. Parents need more time to teach their children what is | not and should not be taught at school. | | Kudos to parents who can afford and decide to be more hands on | with children's education. It is heartbreaking when all a child | has is public school. | Bostonian wrote: | "We need more teachers and smaller classes." | | That would cost more, and reading the blog makes me want to | send less money to the public schools. | dnndev wrote: | Another approach could be: | | High school should be completely optional. Those who want to | go will benefit from it and those who don't won't be there to | make trouble. | | Move the high school teachers to middle school and elementary | for smaller classes. | Bostonian wrote: | For some reason my comment was downvoted. Does the system | portrayed sound like one that is using resources efficiently | to do important things? In some respects the school may doing | harm, teaching students that they can be late and miss | assignments without consequences. In the private sector they | would be fired. | dane-pgp wrote: | If you think that giving less money to struggling public | services is a way to improve those services, then you are | part of the problem. Political opportunists rely on that | line of thinking to put public services into a death | spiral, and their failure becomes a self-fulfilling | prophecy. | Ivdg3 wrote: | No, public school in the United States is broken. They're quite | functional in the majority of the OECD. | | If you are a parent and are in SF this should be a wake up | call. The city is rapidly failing, it's in your best interest | to get out now. | Popegaf wrote: | > They're quite functional in the majority of the OECD. | | Functional isn't what should be aimed for: excellent should | be the mark. Right now, the majority still forces their | students into thought boxes (e.g if you fail maths at school, | you're supposedly balls at engineering for the rest of your | life), pretends that spending 12 years memorizing facts is | the pinnacle of education, employs unmotivated teachers with | below-average salaries, and teaches topics from the last | century. | | My university experience was simply a continuation of | highschool and being treated like a child. Exams we still | about memorizing with no focus on understanding, attendance | was obligatory, tech was sometimes >20 years old, and so on | and so forth. | | Even the systems and curriculums within states (!= country) | can vary pretty heavily. The bologna reform supposedly made | comparing degrees between countries better, but a bachelor in | mechanical engineering may mean something entirely different | in Poland and Spain. | | Better doesn't automatically mean good. | briandear wrote: | Public schools where I live in Texas are great. Much better | than the $33k per year school we had in Silicon Valley. The | places were they seem broken are in big city districts where | certain political factions, specifically teacher unions, get | outsized influence on policy. I saw this up close when I | lived in Jersey City and was considering a run for school | board on Mayor Fulup's slate of candidates. After being | warned about "crossing the unions" and getting into tiffs | with the NAACP representative, I discovered that many of | these groups don't care a lick about education, only money | and power. And it isn't about funding: look at the per pupil | expenditures in DC or New York, and compare them to Austin | suburbs like Leander, or Houston suburbs like the Woodlands. | Those suburban districts spend less than the districts that | perpetually fail. There are policy problems, not financial | ones. | throwaway6734 wrote: | >And it isn't about funding: look at the per pupil | expenditures in DC or New York, and compare them to Austin | suburbs like Leander, or Houston suburbs like the Woodlands | | Spending per pupil can be a deceiving statistic due to the | vastly different needs between poor/middle-class/wealthy | students | robbrown451 wrote: | Are you aware that most of the San Francisco Bay Area is not | actually in the city of San Francisco? | akomtu wrote: | "critical thinking" is what I think parents should teach to | their kids. By that I mean giving cases of deception, | gaslighting, etc. and asking the kid to discern the lie and the | intent of the lie. I don't think schools teach this skill these | days. | ryty wrote: | They punish this skill. I was literally expelled from my high | school during senior year for arguing with a teacher over her | misinterpretation of something stated pretty plainly in the | textbook. The teacher got furious when I stated confidently | that she was wrong, and within about 15 minutes I had been | taken to the principal's office and told to never tell a | teacher that they are wrong, to which I said "even if they | are wrong?" and she expelled me on the spot. The expulsion | was overturned about a week later but it was a terrible week | for me and my parents, and I got pretty behind in my | schoolwork because of it. And to be clear the problem was | that the teacher was saying something different from the | textbook, so this was not a subjective matter, or a question | of knowledge exactly. If she had just said "ignore the | textbook" it would have been fine. | briandear wrote: | It's against their best interests to teach this. Imagine if | they taught critical thinking about the Covid epidemic. The | very logic unions used to keep schools closed would be | unraveled if students and parents were thinking critically. | whatshisface wrote: | I think you are working in the right direction, but you have | to include lies that are believed by the teller, semi-lies | that were honestly conceived but lose their earnestness | through determined avoidance of self-questioning, and even | honest but harmful mistakes. | 11thEarlOfMar wrote: | The only aspect that is not distressing is that there is at least | one public school teacher who can recognize the futility of | trying to simultaneously accommodate students, parents and | administration. | | What educational outcome do these groups expect? | arkh wrote: | > Colleagues from programs where these moves happened earlier | have pointed out what the results have been: kids wind up with | stellar grade point averages and glowing recommendations, get | into top colleges, and... drop out after about three weeks, | saying that they feel like they're years behind everyone else and | don't know what's going on, because they are and they don't. | | There must a good way to describe this "school to life in debt" | pipeline. Doing everything to get young people to go to college | where they'll have to get a loan which the state will gladly | guarantee, the college will take the money and debt collectors | will be happy to setup decades long plans to get some interest | back. | avanai wrote: | The umlauts for quotes thing is really interesting. I don't know | why the author went for "these kids haven't seen enough 'proper' | text" rather than, say "these kids weren't taught typing and | discovered a creative solution that communicates their intent | well." | Skunkleton wrote: | That one left me scratching my head. A physical keyboard has a | key specifically for a quote, and entering an umlaut isn't | straightforward on iOS. International keyboard maybe? | splithalf wrote: | The soft bigotry of different standards is talked about but | rarely is the premise carefully examined. Can there be a single | standard? Maybe the problem is expecting a good essay, composed | in earnest, by a kid that can "barely string a sentence | together." We ought not be surprised when humans act human. | | Maybe we should redefine public education to be a bit more | exclusive, and not shame those that aren't on a college track | into pursuing mentally challenging work for which we are unfit. | Give kids the money that would be spent on their education | (loosely defined) and let them invest it, or spend on vocational | training or seed money to start their own small business. Too | much focus on producing som eidetic notion of the educated | individual. People don't wind up homeless because they weren't | exposed to Shakespeare. Some people will be lucky to attain | enough basic skill to stay afloat. If such a person is able to | fool plagiarism software, maybe that's something to celebrate. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-06-19 23:00 UTC)