[HN Gopher] Why wood has gotten so dang expensive
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Why wood has gotten so dang expensive
        
       Author : Whitespace
       Score  : 206 points
       Date   : 2021-06-27 15:11 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (constructionphysics.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (constructionphysics.substack.com)
        
       | praptak wrote:
       | Okay, people stay at home more, so they need more space, so
       | there's demand for construction.
       | 
       | What about the spaces people used to occupy before covid moved
       | them home? Does it drive demand for demolition?
        
         | cpach wrote:
         | I guess people hope to return some day. To public libraries,
         | pubs, restaurants, etc.
        
         | rantwasp wrote:
         | i wish this was a demand and supply thing but I am really
         | afraid this is going to turn out to be inflation. And it's
         | actually all the prices that are going up - we're just talking
         | about wood because we have a good narrative around it.
        
           | Robotbeat wrote:
           | 10 to 20% would be really high inflation but we're talking
           | about like 200 or 300% wood prices. Nah, even if we happen to
           | have higher inflation than any other year in the last
           | century, lumber prices will still fall a lot.
        
           | treis wrote:
           | Lumber prices have tripled for dimensional lumber. It's
           | clearly a short term supply/demand thing and not an inflation
           | thing.
        
             | rantwasp wrote:
             | why not both?
             | 
             | IMHO inflation is real and it's going to bite us hard
        
             | lazide wrote:
             | What people consider 'bad' inflation is too much
             | money/demand chasing constrained supply that can't keep up.
             | 
             | If it is a required/needed good, that causes people to
             | raise the amount they are willing to spend to get what they
             | need. Inflationary spirals happen when this 'infects'
             | enough markets. Everyone is spending all their money
             | chasing an ever harder to get/more expensive set of
             | essentials, and are willing to spend more and more as time
             | goes on as they get more desperate.
             | 
             | Lumber is probably negotiable/non-essential enough it's not
             | likely to kick off an inflationary spiral. Food, rent,
             | transportation, though tend to be key.
        
               | rantwasp wrote:
               | lumber is used in construction. no construction? less
               | housing. less housing? more rent.
        
         | alkonaut wrote:
         | Office rents will probably take a hit in the new normal but I'm
         | guessing everyone now just waits to see what happens.
         | 
         | What's clear is that many of us with two people who will work
         | from home a lot the coming years have at least one room too few
         | and are building extensions. My builder bought a $25k load of
         | materials and left it on my lawn before summer for an extension
         | they'll build in August, because their supplier advertised that
         | prices would increase 50% in July.
        
         | mcguire wrote:
         | Weren't rents in SF falling drastically in the second half of
         | 2020?
        
       | seaorg wrote:
       | Take it from a guy who works in the industry.
       | https://youtu.be/zCvEFXSYFS8
        
       | RickJWagner wrote:
       | I'm a wood working hobbyist.
       | 
       | I used to pay about $3 for an 8 foot 2x4 at the local big-box /
       | lumber store. I looked this week -- $9 for the same lumber!
       | 
       | I'm going to wait for this to blow over before I build anything,
       | I think.
        
       | kevinthew wrote:
       | Great summary and analysis. The context on the cracker shutdowns
       | in February makes it all the more clear. This processing
       | bottleneck has been playing out across the commodities sphere as
       | the 2nd order impacts from COVID play out.
        
       | AtlasBarfed wrote:
       | When will empress tree farming start? it's vields are 2-4x the
       | rate of other woods and supposedly is construction usable?
        
         | avhon1 wrote:
         | That seems unlikely in the U.S., since it's an invasive species
         | that out-competes native trees.
         | 
         | https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/terrestrial/plants/princ...
        
           | Robotbeat wrote:
           | How is that an argument against farms of it? Does Europe not
           | grow maize because it's a New World crop?
        
             | Ryan_Goosling wrote:
             | Seems like a valid argument. I wonder what an
             | environmentalist would have to say, considering a bird can
             | carry seeds away from a farm, right?
        
       | ur-whale wrote:
       | Is this just a US thing or is it global?
        
       | RyanGoosling wrote:
       | Guys, maybe you can help me. Should I buy a house in California
       | in this market? Or will it all crash when the foreclosure ban
       | ends at the end of July???
        
       | mothsonasloth wrote:
       | I am in Scotland and we are struggling for all sorts of
       | materials:
       | 
       | - PIR insulation
       | 
       | - Membranes (DPM, Roof membranes, Vapor check)
       | 
       | - External Cladding (red cedar, siberian larch)
       | 
       | - Concrete
       | 
       | I've had all range of excuses; Covid19, Brexit, Suez Canal and
       | Americans are stealing lumber from Europe.
       | 
       | There are some lumber mills in the Highlands of Scotland that are
       | shipping CLS and other framing timber straight to USA.
        
         | myself248 wrote:
         | > Americans are stealing lumber from Europe
         | 
         | I'm picturing Carmen Sandiego putting a freighter full of
         | lumber in her pocket...
        
       | barnyfried wrote:
       | Land owners in the south are getting squeezed by the mills to the
       | point there's almost no profit in growing trees. Some of them are
       | turning to selling "renewable energy" in the form of wood pellets
       | for "renewable energy" power plants.
       | 
       | In other words, its more profitable to burn trees then sell them
       | to sawmills.
       | 
       | Pretty interesting how I was bag-shamed at the grocery store
       | years ago using paper bags. And now those same people are using
       | paper bags. I guess in the rock paper scissors of woke
       | environmental policy, dolphins always beat trees.
        
       | jjav wrote:
       | Any good source for a graph tracking lumber prices week to week
       | at the retail shelf (as opposed to futures pricing which is easy
       | to find)?
        
       | humbleMouse wrote:
       | This is old news, lumber futures are around 800 dollars now.
        
         | typon wrote:
         | "old news"? That's still double the price compared to 2019
        
           | spamizbad wrote:
           | They're now at 775. They are still declining rapidly.
        
             | simplify wrote:
             | What website do you use to monitor this?
        
               | 0x53 wrote:
               | https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/commodities/lbs
        
               | pjc50 wrote:
               | That looks uncannily like the Bitcoin price chart.
        
               | quickthrowman wrote:
               | The Bitcoin chart looks like the 18th century south sea
               | bubble chart:
               | 
               | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:South-sea-bubble-
               | chart....
               | 
               | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Sea_Company
               | 
               | Bubbles are not a new phenomenon by any means
        
       | beebeepka wrote:
       | "in the US"...
       | 
       | This habit if speaking as if one is the center of the universe is
       | a bit tiring
        
         | selfhoster11 wrote:
         | I understand that this website is SV boy's club, but really I
         | expect something more from an audience that is more
         | cosmopolitan and world-educated than the average.
        
           | echelon wrote:
           | All that vitriol for not adding a clause to make you feel
           | included?
           | 
           | The majority of HN posters are probably in the US.
           | 
           | I don't get upset when articles are posted about the Bay
           | Area, where I don't happen to live.
        
             | publicola1990 wrote:
             | I will make a guess that majority of HN readers are outside
             | the US of A.
        
               | da_big_ghey wrote:
               | No, number are about half split in two:
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26869936
        
               | OJFord wrote:
               | Not GP but that does surprise me too. I would've guessed
               | USA by far the largest single country, but <<50% total.
               | 
               | (dang does say there that's a few years old, so could've
               | changed a bit, but I think I would've guessed the same
               | then too.)
        
             | selfhoster11 wrote:
             | It's not vitriol, it's an objective observation that this
             | website is by and for a specific audience. Perhaps my
             | phrasing is pithy, but that is on purpose.
        
               | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
               | This type of defense is totally disingenuous. You refered
               | to this website as "SV's boys club", and now are arguing
               | you are just being "pithy".
               | 
               | I neither live in SV nor am a boy and that doesn't have
               | any impact on the value I get from this site. The fact
               | that the majority of users are from the US and hence some
               | articles have a US focus is also unsurprising.
        
           | bdcravens wrote:
           | Is it? There's only about 3 million people in SV; Houston or
           | Chicago are larger. While SV may have a disproportionate
           | representation on HN, that area is likely still a small
           | percentage of the users here. (as a single data point, I'm in
           | Houston)
           | 
           | edit: according to dang, about 10%
           | 
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26869936
        
         | kube-system wrote:
         | Lumber price soared globally as well, for the same reasons.
         | COVID was a global thing, after all.
         | 
         | https://m.dw.com/en/demand-for-lumber-soars-in-germany-and-s...
         | 
         | That being said, as the article mentions, most lumber in North
         | America is from _Canada_ , not the US.
        
           | unnah wrote:
           | Also, lumber is traded globally. US buyers have been
           | importing more lumber from Europe during COVID than before. I
           | guess that means that the demand has been higher in the US.
        
           | qwertox wrote:
           | The shortage isn't that much a result from the pandemic and
           | people doing more DIY-projects, but because the US and China
           | (and also Germany, if we talk about local wood) are building
           | a lot of houses. China buys more wood from Germany now that
           | Russia has set an export ban on wood. The only odd thing
           | which I see is that the export ban is supposed to start in
           | January 2022 [1] so I don't understand why China is already
           | starting to buy more wood from Germany.
           | 
           | [1] https://www.margulesgroome.com/publications/russias-
           | proposed...
        
             | kube-system wrote:
             | Those DIY projects, increase in home improvement, and
             | increase in housing demand has been due to the changes in
             | people's consumption patterns because of changes in
             | people's work patterns due to the pandemic.
        
           | oblak wrote:
           | I understand but the article is clearly written with the US
           | in mind. In that sense, adding a few more letters, for
           | context, would've been appreciated.
        
           | jbay808 wrote:
           | Yes, I can confirm that lumber prices in Canada went sky-
           | high.
        
         | syops wrote:
         | If a large enough percentage of users of a site are from a
         | given country then isn't it natural that those users will
         | unconsciously make a corresponding assumption in their posts.
         | This is especially so since for most Americans talk about
         | neighboring countries is low.
        
       | h2odragon wrote:
       | The is from May; prices have fallen quite a bit off peaks I hear
       | and some speculators are now trapped under big loads ordered 2
       | months ago now being delivered.
       | 
       | There's "we bought a sawmill!" ads here in the rural lands now
       | for fresh sawn green pine and oak; which isn't "lumber" yet in
       | any useful sense. I've seen porches being built that won't last
       | the summer.
        
         | pengaru wrote:
         | plywood at my local home depot is still very much at its
         | highest price ever when I checked last week ($135 for a 1-1/8"
         | 4x8 sheet of t&g subfloor)
         | 
         | > There's "we bought a sawmill!" ads here in the rural lands
         | now for fresh sawn green pine and oak; which isn't "lumber" yet
         | in any useful sense. I've seen porches being built that won't
         | last the summer.
         | 
         | The allegedly "kiln dried lumber" home depot has been selling
         | has been criminally wet throughout the last year too. Not only
         | have people been paying through the nose for the stuff, it's
         | been nowhere near ready to use. I had to let boards I bought
         | for building gambrel rafters sit for a month on my covered deck
         | before attempting to cut them to the pattern. And even after
         | that, a bunch of them shrunk another 1/4" from the pattern in
         | the subsequent month of waiting for me to install. Infuriating
         | to pay so much for stuff that isn't even top quality and ready
         | to go. I also had to throw a few away from splitting and
         | twisting during the drying process...
        
           | gotorazor wrote:
           | KD-HT is a pretty standardized, commodity product. I used to
           | work at a lumber yard on their Heat Treat process. I am
           | pretty sure that the lumber I see at Home Depot are the same
           | lumber that I use to work on. It's not like they have their
           | own mills and ovens. They buy the same commodity lumber like
           | everyone else.
           | 
           | TBH, the lumber yard I worked at you to flood. We would have
           | bundled stacks of lumber float all across the yard. We can
           | pretty much take them the next day and ship them to a
           | construction site. KD-HT lumber is pretty good like that.
           | 
           | Now, most of our large customers just have a reasonable
           | expectation of the product. It's wood. It's gonna warp. It's
           | gonna split. It's like most things like fresh fruits, or
           | meat, or leather. There is a lot of variability.
        
           | axaxs wrote:
           | Yeah, prices are still ridiculous. Apparently it takes a
           | couple months for the aforementioned price drops in futures
           | to trickle down. If HD bought it for 100, they ain't gonna
           | sell it for 50 regardless of what sawmills are doing(unless
           | of course forced to with overstock and such).
        
             | sokoloff wrote:
             | If the market-clearing price that their competitors are
             | selling it for is $50, they'll sell it for around $50 or
             | they won't sell it.
        
               | YokoZar wrote:
               | You two are saying the same thing. If they won't sell due
               | to an uncompetitively high price, then they'll have
               | overstock. Then they'll be "forced to" sell lower.
        
               | sokoloff wrote:
               | I'm saying they'll do it even if they're just normally
               | (or even partially) stocked with material. They know
               | their customers are cross-shopping them with other
               | stores, they need to be competitive, and they don't want
               | to lose the rest of the order lines nor train customers
               | that they're not competitively priced.
        
           | rootusrootus wrote:
           | > criminally wet throughout the last year too
           | 
           | That is not a recent thing. Home Depot wood has been dripping
           | wet for many years. It's routine to put a screw into it and
           | have water running past the head as you tighten it. I
           | typically buy 50-100% more than I expect to use on the
           | assumption that a good chunk of it will warp as it dries and
           | become useless.
        
             | pengaru wrote:
             | Most of my big diy home construction projects happened to
             | overlap with the pandemic, and when I described the wet
             | lumber problems to a local with more building experience he
             | was so confident their lumber was properly kiln dried he
             | attacked my ability to measure and cut properly...
             | 
             | I'm not sure if I should feel better or worse about the
             | situation knowing home depot has been doing this long
             | before the pandemic.
        
               | LambdaComplex wrote:
               | I'm pretty sure it's common knowledge that the lumber
               | from the big (blue and orange) box stores is incredibly
               | lacking in quality.
        
               | abakker wrote:
               | That wood from Stimson is the worst ever. I don't think
               | you can buy worse. I've used all sorts in my life and HD
               | consistently has lumber that cannot even be used to start
               | fires until you dry it.
               | 
               | Plywood is fine, but if you need anything you build to
               | last, buy pressure treated at HD, or buy plain lumber
               | somewhere else.
               | 
               | (I bought some 2x4s for a non-permanent project during
               | the pandemic. It was so soft and wet that when I fired a
               | railgun into one of the pieces, the nail went all the way
               | through. That should not happen)
        
               | LambdaComplex wrote:
               | Whenever I go to Lowes, I always like to go by the lumber
               | section (even when I'm not there for lumber) just to see
               | how warped the dimensional lumber is. It's always a
               | depressing experience.
        
             | justinator wrote:
             | Just making sure you're not buying the pressure treated
             | wood?
             | 
             | HD sells pressure treated wood that's then kiln dried
             | (KDAT), if you would like to open up a large line of credit
             | with them.
        
               | rootusrootus wrote:
               | No, just garden variety 2x4x8 kiln-dried studs. Normally
               | a few bucks apiece but going for closer to ten right now.
               | 
               | YMMV, but for people who need actual kiln-dried wood it's
               | usually a better option to go to a real lumber yard.
        
           | xienze wrote:
           | > The allegedly "kiln dried lumber" home depot has been
           | selling has been criminally wet throughout the last year too.
           | 
           | Eh it's always been that way. Warped and with plenty of knots
           | too. It was considered poor quality back when a 2x4 cost
           | $2.50.
        
           | cptskippy wrote:
           | Oddly the good stuff wasn't much affected. I was making a
           | work bench and picked up a 4x8 of red oak plywood for under
           | $60 in May. Not what I would normally use but half the price.
        
             | dugmartin wrote:
             | I was in Home Depot a couple of days ago (in Western
             | Massachusetts). Crappy 19/32 CDX was $85 for a 4x8 sheet.
             | Sitting right next to it was 3/4" oak veneer at $60. I
             | think it would be pretty funny to sheath a house in sort of
             | cabinet grade plywood (it is 7 ply Purebond which usually
             | has a couple of voids per sheet).
        
             | xyzzyz wrote:
             | Yeah, this is strange, especially as red oak plywood is
             | mostly the same thing as normal plywood, the red oak is
             | just a thin veneer on the face. I've been buying cherry
             | lumber recently, and they went from something like $4.50/bf
             | to $6.50/bf here. Significant increase, but not 3-fold.
             | 
             | Now that I think of it, it kinda makes sense: it's not the
             | timber that's gotten more expensive, but the service of
             | milling it. For products from relatively more expensive
             | hardwood timber, milling costs constitute smaller fraction
             | of the final cost, so even if milling costs triple, the
             | final product might only go by 50%.
        
               | munificent wrote:
               | It's more than just that. You can see weird price changes
               | like this because of the limits of substitution.
               | 
               | Imagine you've got a project to build a bookcase. You're
               | using cheaper normal plywood for hidden structural parts
               | and nicer but more expensive red plywood for the stuff
               | people will see. You price the whole thing out.
               | 
               | Then the price of wood skyrockets. To keep the price of
               | the whole project under control, you start cutting costs.
               | You use more of the cheaper plywood for the whole project
               | and decide to skimp on the red oak.
               | 
               | Scale that across many projects and you get a paradoxical
               | result where the cheapest goods in a category go up in
               | price while the better goods don't, because people are
               | subbing out the "cheap" stuff for the good stuff.
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giffen_good
        
               | ethbr0 wrote:
               | FWIW, substitutability is a hard problem with algorithmic
               | pricing, even for relatively stable inventory categories
               | like big box construction retail.
               | 
               | I'd guess (with some insider knowledge) that (1) there
               | wasn't any prebuilt link to adjust substitute pricing &
               | (2) Depot didn't care enough to adjust pricing.
               | 
               | Both Depot and Lowes are in it for volume and long-term,
               | which is why they don't do things like spike generator
               | prices after hurricanes.
        
               | abakker wrote:
               | A friend of mine in CT has problem now in the hardwood
               | supply chain. The issue is that the kiln drying backlog
               | has now caught up with hardwoods as many kilns are full
               | of fir and pine. The supplies of paint grade poplar and
               | soft maple are running quite low now.
        
         | JoeAltmaier wrote:
         | Green sawn wood is usually stacked, and the stack's own weight
         | will hold the boards relatively straight as they dry.
         | 
         | Build something, and the whole structure can bend and curl.
        
         | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
         | It seems like the spectacular boom in home renovation will have
         | to lead to an eventual bust at some point - people generally
         | don't want to do a major renovation that often.
         | 
         | That said, it seems like the huge spike in building materials
         | did a very good thing by making many people postpone
         | renovations until prices come down, which should help smooth
         | out the peak-to-trough chart of building construction.
        
         | bcrosby95 wrote:
         | > There's "we bought a sawmill!" ads here in the rural lands
         | now for fresh sawn green pine and oak; which isn't "lumber" yet
         | in any useful sense. I've seen porches being built that won't
         | last the summer.
         | 
         | I'm curious why this is. Is it the drying stage, or something
         | else?
        
           | alamortsubite wrote:
           | Yes. The wood will twist and bend as it dries.
        
             | monetus wrote:
             | - Which, for those curious, is the the whole idea behind
             | greenwood carpentry.
             | 
             | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_woodworking
             | 
             | Its a shame more of that craft isn't going around. Granted,
             | I'm not sure how a greenwood porch would work.
        
               | jjeaff wrote:
               | Wouldn't work well at all for any construction that isn't
               | using mortise and tenon or some other type of friction
               | fit construction. Can be disastrous for traditional
               | construction where pieces are butted up together and
               | nailed.
        
               | h2odragon wrote:
               | Green white oak, especially, can do some cool stuff. I
               | imagine you could do a porch with lap built and grain
               | matched construction and get a "tensegrity" bonus as
               | stuff dried; but ive never seen that trick done with
               | anything more complicated or smaller than house siding.
        
           | ArkanExplorer wrote:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood_drying
           | 
           | Wood for construction needs to reach an equilibrium moisture
           | point with the outdoor air after its cut.
           | 
           | If its dried outside, it takes months to years to dry,
           | depending on the humidity level and temperature.
           | 
           | The wood is dried because it makes it lighter, and the
           | shrinkage and swelling has already played out during the
           | drying process... instead of when its in place!
        
           | drewzero1 wrote:
           | Yes, wood that is used to build something before it has been
           | dried will warp and curl.
        
           | tastyfreeze wrote:
           | You can build out of green lumber. But, as wood dries it will
           | twist, warp, and crack. If you happen to live somewhere humid
           | building with green wood is an invitation for fungal rot. For
           | both durability and square building it is better to dry the
           | wood first.
        
             | silon42 wrote:
             | I'm sure there's plenty of "almost dry" wood in California.
        
             | rootusrootus wrote:
             | You can frame up houses, but code usually mandates no more
             | than 15-19% moisture before you can close the walls up, for
             | exactly that reason.
        
         | divbzero wrote:
         | It's fascinating how consistently the shortage and glut cycle
         | plays out across a diverse range of commodities. The common
         | elements seem to be an undifferentiated product and some delay
         | in the production cycle. The length of shortage and glut
         | depends on the length of delay, which is exacerbated if
         | production depends on fixed assets that take a long time to
         | build and a long time to wear down ( _e.g._ ships).
        
         | dragontamer wrote:
         | It was clearly a sawmill issue. Lumber was expensive but timber
         | was cheap.
         | 
         | I don't know how to calculate if more sawmills are needed
         | (permanent backlog) or if it's a temporary backlog. I figure
         | that speculation is for the commodity traders and maybe some
         | stock / sawmill speculators.
         | 
         | In practice, guess and check may scale better? But I've also
         | been to towns where the sawmill shut down and destroyed the
         | local economy, so guess and check may be immoral (even if it's
         | somewhat profitable)
        
         | yskchu wrote:
         | Yes it has fallen a lot (nearly 50%) from the May peak:
         | 
         | https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/lumber-...
        
         | dev_tty01 wrote:
         | Yeah, its a shame the article left off what is probably one of
         | the biggest reasons for the price spike. Speculation. 4x price
         | spikes in a relatively stable commodity aren't explained by
         | simple supply/demand economic factors. The article is a couple
         | of months old and we can now see the speculative bubble
         | unwinding.
         | 
         | https://markets.businessinsider.com/commodities/lumber-price
         | 
         | Down 8% two days ago. Down over 50% from the peak. No doubt
         | prices will remain above trend for a while, but 4X is just
         | another case of speculative nonsense over-amplifying the
         | realities.
        
           | asdfasgasdgasdg wrote:
           | Is it speculation or is it hedging? We weren't speculating on
           | toilet paper when it was massively out of supply early in the
           | pandemic. Rather, there was a demand shock, and maybe a bit
           | of a supply shock too. If TP's spot price had been
           | meaningfully allowed to float, I have no doubt that it would
           | have traded at 4x its long term average, even if you had
           | factored in only consumer demand.
           | 
           | All that is to say I don't see compelling evidence here that
           | speculation is the cause of the problem. I can as easily see
           | more benign explanations.
        
             | arcticbull wrote:
             | Is there a meaningful difference between speculation and
             | hedging - besides the intent to take delivery? People
             | hedging with the intent to take delivery are simply
             | speculating that the price would go up. Maybe it makes more
             | sense to separate out along those lines instead.
        
               | asdfasgasdgasdg wrote:
               | Yes, I think there is. Speculation is trading activity
               | with the intent to profit from a change in price. Hedging
               | -- in the sense I'm talking about -- is buying an asset
               | to guard against a change in price or shortage. You can
               | certainly see them as similar things, and in some sense
               | they are, but I think there would be broad agreement that
               | this sort of hedging does not deserve the same scorn that
               | some have for speculators.
               | 
               | Even if the activity is exactly the same, most people
               | tend to feel differently about an activity because of its
               | motivation. The motivation to obtain large profits is
               | held in much less respect than the motivation to guard
               | against personal shortage. Also, corporate behaviors in
               | general get a lower prior amount of esteem than
               | individual and household level behaviors.
               | 
               | We can definitely talk about whether people _ought_ to
               | view these things differently, but there is little
               | question as to whether they currently _do_.
        
               | BurningFrog wrote:
               | This may just be a Russel Conjugation.
               | 
               | https://tomdehnel.com/what-is-russell-conjugation/
        
           | ketamine__ wrote:
           | How does speculation drive the price of lumber up?
        
           | kevin_thibedeau wrote:
           | I'm keeping fingers crossed copper will fall back down. I was
           | pricing out some heavy gauge wire last year for a project and
           | passed because I wasn't ready to work on it. Now I'm kicking
           | myself for not pulling the trigger.
        
           | themodelplumber wrote:
           | Just from a technical perspective, the 1Y chart on that page
           | shows some real promise, for example higher highs and higher
           | lows on multiple time scales.
           | 
           | I'm not terribly interested in lumber but if you want a good
           | price, with that chart it seems like now may be a great time
           | to buy given the current low. It may also be the last time at
           | that price level for a while. (No promises, just what I'd
           | speculate based on the chart)
           | 
           | Edit: To clarify, this comment is mostly registering my
           | surprise. I see no cabal speculation activity, just a big
           | invite for your neighbor to buy some for their active
           | retirement fund at these levels. Think about that as another
           | variable.
        
             | catillac wrote:
             | I can't quite tell if you're either lampshading/mocking
             | speculator thinking or if this is sincere. But the thinking
             | behind the above comment largely seems to be the source of
             | all the problems.
        
               | themodelplumber wrote:
               | Is this thinking _really_ the source of all the problems?
               | 
               | I have to admit I expected to see something idiotic when
               | I clicked through to the link! Like, "pshah, pure
               | speculation!" but instead I am looking at a chart that
               | any broker worth their salt, even a conservative one,
               | might green-light for a client right now, today. So I'm
               | sharing what I'm seeing and no, this doesn't perfectly
               | fit a speculation-cabal mindset.
               | 
               | IOW: This is clearly a price level where your non-cabal
               | types will happily buy in and take a reasonable profit
               | later.
               | 
               | For all we know, the really evil ones could have brought
               | it down to this level. So are we going to pin the blame
               | on those millions of people attempting to prepare for a
               | retirement?
               | 
               | And there's nothing wrong with sharing another
               | perspective, is there, really?
               | 
               | Nobody's even proven, or shown how speculation is the
               | source of the problem. It's just expected that we simply
               | believe that? Speculation could be a side effect for all
               | we really know.
               | 
               | I've been trading technicals for years, and a huge lesson
               | you learn is that everybody has a "why", and everybody
               | has a story, but it always comes late. You then turn
               | around and see the same patterns in nature and start to
               | realize: "Why" can be a terribly unhelpful and misleading
               | direction to take your solutions-oriented mindset.
               | 
               | If you want to cut down on speculation, IMO you need to
               | look into things critically, deeply, and everybody's
               | "why" ought to be first. Was it _really_ speculation? Or
               | are speculators just watching natural patterns unfold and
               | joining the ride?
               | 
               | Metaphorically: Even if it feels amazing to pin the blame
               | on the fox who got into the hen house, do you want to go
               | after every fox in the forest, or maybe understand the
               | fox better--draw the foxes around to another location, or
               | design a hen house with doors on it?
               | 
               | I visited the link with an open mind. But I have
               | experience with charts like that and I can tell you,
               | people will buy here, and the price will very likely go
               | up again. I just think that we can do better, creatively
               | if we want to "solve" the greater lumber issue.
        
               | edoceo wrote:
               | It seems you are working from a theory built around price
               | "anchoring". It's a proven bad model.
        
               | themodelplumber wrote:
               | Nope, not price anchoring. And how do you effectively
               | prove a negative anyway...I see people profiting from
               | models that were long considered voodoo. Always manage
               | risk.
        
               | catillac wrote:
               | Yes, it's clear speculation is the source of much of
               | this, "all" was hyperbole on my part.
        
               | themodelplumber wrote:
               | > fairly clearly speculation is the source of much of
               | this
               | 
               | That's a hand wave. You don't want to open your mind and
               | look at different perspectives, fine. But let's not ever
               | think of such a position as a high-quality one.
        
               | catillac wrote:
               | Okay that seems reasonable.
        
         | punkrex wrote:
         | My FiL works in the industry on large projects, and the word
         | from suppliers is that in Jan, prices should drop 50% from
         | where ever Dec ends up, as there is going to be a ton of
         | supply.
        
       | qwertox wrote:
       | Just today I was listening to a German podcast on this topic
       | ("Warum Bauholz zurzeit knapp und teuer ist") [1]. Main
       | explanation of it having become so expensive in Germany as well
       | is the high demand in the US, China and in Germany itself. Russia
       | has set an export ban on wood, so China is buying more from
       | Germany.
       | 
       | Germany currently has a surplus of wood, yet the prices aren't
       | low. Sawmills are the main benefactors of the current situation,
       | they're processing wood like never before, also because last year
       | a lot of trees were affected by beetles, fungi, storms and the
       | like. So this lower quality wood (which is perfectly fine to use)
       | has been mainly exported. 40% of the processed wood is exported.
       | 
       | Sawmills are buying the trees for cheap due to the surplus that
       | the forest owners (around 96% of the owners own less than 20 ha)
       | are saying that they're now considering to stop selling wood and
       | wait for the fall or next year if they can handle it.
       | 
       | Then again, if they stop selling the wood, the state- or
       | community-owned forest owners (around half of the German forests
       | are privately owned, the other half by the state or communities)
       | might not be able to to pay for the machinery and workers which
       | usually work the entire year around. Also private owners have got
       | together and share machinery and personell which needs to get
       | payed during the entire year. So to some degree they are forced
       | to continue cutting down trees to sell them.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/probleme-der-baubranche-
       | warum...
        
       | cube00 wrote:
       | It was sad to hear the larger construction companies using their
       | buying power to purchase all available stock and store in their
       | warehouses with no assigned jobs. They were pushing smaller
       | construction companies to the wall when they couldn't access any
       | stock for jobs they actually had on.
        
         | sokoloff wrote:
         | If you are a construction company and anticipate a
         | possible/likely disruption in one of your critical raw
         | materials and have the funds to protect your business, what
         | else would you do? It doesn't sound predatory; rather it sounds
         | eminently sensible.
        
           | SQueeeeeL wrote:
           | Tragedy of the Commons is sensible. Businesses exist to
           | maximize their own existence. Must suck to be one of those
           | tiny firms lol
        
         | mathgladiator wrote:
         | It's like the real-life monopoly game being played in real
         | life. Buy up all the houses, don't upgrade them to hotels until
         | you can buy them back.
        
       | aazaa wrote:
       | The article is from May. A lot has happened since then.
       | 
       | This chart of lumber futures gives an idea of the recent past
       | (zoom out 1-5 years for perspective):
       | 
       | https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=CME%3ALBS1!
       | 
       | In a nutshell: a huge advance and now what appears to be a crash
       | (~ -50%) is currently in progress.
       | 
       | The bigger picture is how indicative this compressed boom-bust
       | story is of the future of the surge in US inflation. Lumber is
       | showing us how easy it is for the market to reject ridiculous
       | prices. What's unclear is how low lumber, and other
       | goods/commoditiies that have seen similar booms, can go.
       | 
       | Edit: this links seems to work better
       | 
       | https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/CME-LBS1%21/
        
         | ketamine__ wrote:
         | Chart doesn't load. I'm on Brave. What am I missing?
         | 
         | Downvotes? Really? Eat shit.
        
           | yhoneycomb wrote:
           | Doesn't load for me either (Firefox)
           | 
           | edit: Doesn't even load on Chrome. I think it's just a bad
           | link. Or a bad site.
        
           | aazaa wrote:
           | Odd. I found a better link:
           | https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/CME-LBS1%21/
        
       | GeorgeTirebiter wrote:
       | Why has wood gotten so expensive? It's not like this stuff grows
       | on trees! Oh, wait....
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | SavantIdiot wrote:
       | "Because the storm occurred with very little warning, many
       | factories weren't able to shut down properly, resulting in
       | polymers congealing and solidifying in the equipment"
       | 
       | Wow, I'm surprised there weren't back-up generators if power
       | failure means machine destruction.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-06-27 23:00 UTC)